Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by
Nickesha Senior
308003276
Email:
nickesha.seniorwhynn@open.uwi.edu
Student ID:
308003276
University:
eTutor& Course
Coordinator :
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
2
Table of Contents
Needs Assessment 4
Goals .4
Objectives .4
Target Audience ...4
Purpose of the Needs Assessment.5
Optimals ...5
Actuals .5
Causes ..6
Feelings ....7
Solutions ..8
Hypothesis ...8
Source of Information .9
Methods ..9
Technique 1 9
Technique 2 9
Use of Information to Design Workshop9
Task Analysis .9
Performance Objectives .10
Assessments ...11
Learner/Contextual Analysis .11
Instructional Strategies ..12
Reflection ..12
References .15
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
4
Needs Assessment
Goals
The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate the need for skills training for a group of teachers
and to create a unit of instruction to provide the necessary training in the areas of need. The
various curriculums, the present skills of each teacher as well as the available resources for
training will be assessed to satisfy the requirements of the intended programme.
Objectives
At the end of this assessment the instructional designer should be able to identify:
any lack of skill the teachers at the Excellence Centre have in meeting the demands of the
skills
if the desired learning outcomes are being achieved by the students for each curriculum
The assessment will also help in ascertaining which skills teachers already possess that need
sharpening.
Target Audience
The Institute is very small and thus employs only three teachers full-time and one teacher parttime. The part-time teacher is responsible for teaching English Language while the full-time
teachers focus on mathematics and science. There is also an intern who deals with the accounts
and billing as well as a part-time sales manager. The assessment will be done for the three fulltime teachers; two (2) undergraduate teachers and one (1) graduate teacher at the Excellence
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
Centre Institute who are preparing students to meet the requirements of the K-12 Algebra I and II
specifications, GCSE O and A level examinations as well as the CSEC examinations.
Purpose of the needs assessment
Optimals
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
Teachers are of the opinion that they need to get more time to familiarize themselves with
the syllabi
The hours of work are too much for the teachers to get time to focus on developing their
skills
The teachers are of the opinion that one day off (Sunday) is not sufficient for them to be
fully prepared for all lessons. Preparation time takes away from family time.
Considering that students are entitled to individual attention the teachers feel
overwhelmed when one teacher is faced with five students within the same session
expecting individual attention.
Solutions
Training of staff on using instructional tools such as the graphing calculator
Get more instructional materials such as computers, graphing calculator as well as a
better arrangement of the facility
Training and discussions to allow staff to become familiar with each syllabi
Considering the student-teacher ratio more specialists need to be hired
The working hours need to be revised given more time for teachers to prepare for their
lessons
Teachers should be offered other incentives for getting tasks done on time, well and they
go above and beyond the call of duty.
Monthly professional development days will be instituted to enhance the teachers
understanding and presentation of various topics in the different syllabi
Hypotheses
Based on observation it is seen that:
There is a lack of training in various situations and with specifically the American based
syllabus
There is a need for the familiarity of the syllabi especially the American syllabus
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
Source of information
The information needed will be gathered from the teachers themselves as they are the ones
directly affected by the situation. They would have first-hand knowledge as to all the processes
that take place and what areas need improvement. They are aware of the areas of each syllabus
that are most difficult for them to handle and why.
Methods
Technique 1: Participant observation (See Appendix A for details on participant observation)
Example of Observation Instrument(See Appendix A1 for the example of the instrument)
Technique 2: Personal interview (See Appendix B for details on personal interview)
Example of Personal Interview Instrument(See Appendix B1 for the example of the instrument)
Use of Information to design workshop
The information gathered will help in identifying the challenges of the company and thus give an
idea as to what issues need to be addressed by the workshop. It will also aid in giving ideas as to
possible ways of addressing the issues and the best way of structuring the workshop. It will help
in identifying the skills of the workers that can be utilized in the workshops.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
9
Task Analysis
After engaging in a two day training workshop the participants will demonstrate the use
of the graphing calculator to do operations and calculations in the K-12 syllabus without
assistance and with at least 90% accuracy.
Enabling/Specific Objectives:
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
10
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
11
Learner/Contextual Analysis
This section comes before instruction and the main purposes are to motivate and prepare
participants to learn cognitively, (Tessmer& Richey, 1997). (See Appendix F for the
Learner/Contextual analysis for this unit of instruction).
Instructional Strategies
The First Principles of instruction from David Merrill were very significant in the
completion of this section of the unit. It sought to bring about the activation of the participants
prior knowledge, allowing them to demonstrate what is being learned, also to apply what is
learned and integrate it into their everyday lives. Various methods were used in this section to
include a PowerPoint lesson (See Appendix G), Advanced Organizers (See Appendix H) and
Analogies (See Appendix I). The PowerPoint presentation gives the details of the lesson and
shows how each instructional strategy will be incorporated in the lesson. These strategies such as
organizers and analogies help in tying the pieces of the lesson together as well as enhancing the
presentation.
Reflection
The target audience of this unit of instruction comprised of three trained, degreed
teachers of the Excellence Centre. These teachers have a mandate of preparing students to meet
the requirements of the K-12 Algebra I and II specifications, GCSE O and A level examinations
as well as the CSEC examinations. These teachers are old school and thus are not proficient in
using a graphing calculator to meet the demands of especially the K-12 Algebra I and II
specifications. For this reason,the aim was to engage these teachers in hands-on learning where
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
12
they would get a firsthand experience in constructing their general understanding. The lesson
included games, advanced organizers and analogies. It incorporated various analyses such as task
analyses and learner/contextual analysis.
At the beginning participants were allowed to express themselves thus helping to activate
their prior knowledge. They were engaged in a lucky dip whilst a comparative organizer was
used to link their prior knowledge to what is to be learnt. Then some analogies were made to give
them an understanding of what matrices really are and how they can apply to real life. From
there they watched a video as well as viewed demonstrations from the instructor.A graphic
organizer was used to help in summarizing the concepts learnt on the importance of the order of
matrices in adding, subtracting and multiplying. They were then assessed on the use of the
calculator. They were allowed to demonstrate their understanding of the topic by instructing their
peers. After which a general assessment was done.
For the most part it was an effective lesson. Participants were able to effectively use the
calculator at the end of the workshop. The objectives were attainable and the participants were
fully engaged. One of the areas I would have improved is to have more technological tools
readily available. Using the groups to provide feedback was a welcomed idea however I believe
with more time we would have made it even more meaningful. Through the help of my peer
group I now have a better understanding of the elements of a needs assessment and the
significance of items such as the optimals, actuals, causes, feelings and solutions. These are areas
that were used in guiding the designer in choosing the task that is of utmost importance in being
addressed. I gained an appreciation in being systematic in designing units. It allows for clarity
not only for the designer but the members of the team who might refer to the document.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
The introduction to task analysis was clear, interesting and turned out to be fun. I have
always been writing objectives a certain way, but now I see the significance of sections such as
the criteria. It adds clarity to the objective and makes it easier when writing a rubric and
developing assessment items.The learner/contextual analysis were relatively straight forward
however the instructional strategies took a lot more investigation. All these are things that I
would have done in teacher training however under different contexts and sometimes in less
detail. Overall this course was relevant, interesting and worth the experience.
13
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
14
References
Glynn, S. (1995). Conceptual Bridges: Using Analogies to Explain Scientific Concepts. Science
Teacher, 62(9), 24-27.
Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., &Hannum, W. H. (1998). Task analysis methods for instructional
design.Routledge.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational technology research and
development, 50(3), 43-59.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., &Kalman, H. (2010). Designing effective
instruction.John Wiley & Sons.
Rossett, A. (1995). Needs Assessment.In Anglin, G. J. (Ed). Instructional technology: Past,
present, and future, p.183-196. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.
Tessmer, M., & Richey, R. C. (1997).The role of context in learning and instructional
design. Educational technology research and development, 45(2), 85-115.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
15
Appendix
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
16
Probable Response Rate; Risks:The response will be immediate upon observation. After the
month is finished then the final result of each observation will be compiled into a final
document. The possible risks could be observer bias and many assumptions made based on what
occurs during observation. Also considering that the participants will not be aware that an
observation is taking place the observer will not be making notes, therefore details might not be
completely reliable at times.
Buy In/ Persuasion Potential:This is not very necessary in this situation as the participants are
open to improving their skills and the processes of the institute.
Diversity of Opinions Sought:Not applicable in this situation.
Product/Results:A report will be generated at the end of the observation period.
Problem/Situation Complexity:The ratio of teachers to students is a concern, therefore
observation might overlap. Varying syllabi are done on the same days at the same time by the
same teachers.
Objectivity of Data:This is going to vary based on the workload that the teacher under
observation might have during the time of observation.Availability of instructional material will
also affect how much a teacher might be able to achieve in a given lesson.
Advantages:This method will allow the observer to get firsthand knowledge of the processes that
take place in the institute as well as the skills and challenges the teachers face. This method is
non-threatening to the normal processes of the business and will not affect teachers
performance.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
17
Disadvantages:The teacher to student ratio might affect how much can be observed in one lesson
as well as it might limit the amount that a teacher can get covered. A lot of the observation will
be based on the observers opinion and therefore it might not be very reliable.
Appendix A1: Observation Instrument
Curriculum :
Date:
Observer:
Instructor:
Instructions: Evaluate the overall performance of a teacher in the delivery of each curriculum
by rating each of the behaviours below. Use these results to determine the needs for skills
training, curriculum development and/or increase in instructional material.
Rating Scale:
C Consistency and competency in an area under observation. As well
as the necessary resources are available. Very Good performance.
I improvement needed in the stated areas or instructional materials
needed. Poor performance.
G Generally well done there is room for improvement. Average
performance.
Work Behaviours/ Skills/ Curriculum Knowledge
Demonstrates confidence in presenting the topic being taught
Teacher is adequately prepared for the lesson
Teacher has all the instructional material needed for demonstrations
The teacher refers to books, handouts, YouTube, general internet
The teacher has knowledge of the curriculum being used, is able to do
C
C
C
C
C
I
I
I
I
I
G
G
G
G
G
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
18
Statement of Purpose:Questions will be asked to ascertain what lack of skills, challenges and the
needed instructional material for the Excellence Centre. These interviews will provide
information on the feelings of the teachers and for them to provide personal solutions based on
their concerns. This method will allow them to be more open to conversation and thus share their
ideas on solving any problems identified.
Information sought:See optimals, actuals, causes, feelings and solutions
Group size: This will comprise of one interviewer and one interviewee.
Procedure:The interviewer in preparation for the interview will refer to the purpose of the needs
assessment and prepare questions that are directly related to the information needed. The
teachers will be the ones who will be interviewed.It will be clearly communicated that the
interview is not a way of critiquing the business but to ascertain their opinion on the processes of
the institute. The interviewer will try to ask questions that will not undermine or be too
suggestive to the interviewee. These questions will be asked based on the actuals and optimals.
Anonymity/ Confidentiality:This is not likely in this situation as all participants are known and
will be aware of the interview beforehand.
Development Cost/ Ease:There is no interview cost as the interviews will be done during the
lunch break for three days. The interview instrument will be easy to develop. Research will be
done to find out the days that are most appropriate for each teacher. Since the interviewer is
familiar with the setting it should make both parties feel more at ease.
Administration cost/ Ease:It is a very small institute therefore it will not take a lot of time to do
the interviews. This will not incur any cost.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
19
Scoring/ Analysis Cost/ Ease:The interviews will be completed within one week.
Probable Response Rate; Risks:The response will be immediate upon the interviewee answering
the questions. After all the interviews are finished the final result will be compiled into a final
document. The possible risks could be some participants might be afraid to state certain
challenges within the institute as they might be fearful of the director hearing their opinions. This
will be eliminated however as any challenges or concerns given will be recorded anonymously.
As well as room has to be made for any diversions from the questions or topic at hand.
Buy In/ Persuasion Potential:A polite and courteous personality will help in making the
interviewer more persuasive and thus make the interviewee more open to discussion. The
director will also be interviewed therefore he will be able to make decisions based on any
challenges or lack of skills noted.
Diversity of Opinions Sought:Opinions will be sought from the three persons directly involved
in the institute. Each person has his or her own challenges and concerns and will be able to give
their ideas of how to minimize those challenges.
Problem/Situation Complexity:Questions will be stated in a way to prevent misunderstanding
and to allow the interviewees to share their views. Since it is a face to face setting there will be
very little room for misunderstanding as any such occurrence can be dealt with immediately.
Product/Results:At the end of each interview we will do a recap of the main points. Also at that
point the interviewee will be directly asked if there is any other thing that he or she would like to
share or clarify. The use of the information will be shared so they are clear about the anonymity
of their responses and that further action will be taken to address the issues or challenges.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
20
Objectivity of Data:The data will be very objective as there will be no prejudice and all party
will be treated with respect and fairly.
Advantages:This method allows the interviewer to get firsthand knowledge as to the processes of
the institute and the feelings of the workers. Solutions can also be deduced from these
interviews.
Disadvantages:Interviews might take longer than anticipated. The interviews can take various
turns not in keeping with the plan outlined.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
difficult?
7. How would you propose to make those difficult tasks easier?
8. What aspect of each curriculum do you find to be challenging? Why?
9. How do you suggest these challenges be minimized?
10. What instructional material do you think will aid in making the day to day processes
easier?
21
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
22
Criticality
Universality
Frequency
Standardization
Difficulty
Total
40 pts
10 pts
10 pts
10 pts
30 pts
100 pts
TASKS
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
30
10
10
10
25
85
This is an
important topic
especially in
algebra I and II.
Majority of the
topics involve
the use of
directed numbers
hence the points
awarded.
35
30
83
This is an
essential skill to
the K-12
syllabus
however the
processes that
these perform
can be done
Notes
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
23
effectively
without its use
hence the low
frequency
rating.
35
25
81
The K-12
syllabus is not
the most
commonly used
at the institution
however it is the
most
comprehensive.
Therefore it is
rated heavily
across the board.
20
20
53
This is a topic
that is of
importance in
the GCSE
syllabus. We do
not have a large
amount of
students doing
this programme
hence the low
rating. However
it is an important
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
24
to the syllabus.
40
10
30
93
This is a very
important topic
in all syllabi at
the institute
hence the high
critical rating.
Algebra II
encompasses a
wider area of the
topic than the
other
programmes.
10
25
50
This is a topic in
the CSEC and
K-12 syllabi
however not
having a good
grasp of it does
not affect the
other aspects of
the syllabus.
30
30
78
This is a topic
that is essential
to the GCSE and
K-12 syllabus.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
25
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
26
Appendix C2: Procedural Analysis
Procedural Analysis
LEVEL II
1. Turn on the calculator
1.1 Identify the type of calculator
1.2 Check that it is functioning properly
2. Select the mode from the menu
2.1 Identify the mode key
3. Enter each matrix one at a time
3.1 Click the matrix button
3.2 Enter the dimensions of the matrix
4. Choose the operation needed
4.1 add and subtract matrices
4.2 multiply matrices
5. Use matrices on the graphing to solve simultaneous equations using the Inverse Method
or the Guass-Jordan Elimination Method
5.1 Solve simultaneous equations using the Inverse Method
5.2 Solve simultaneous equations using the Guass-Jordan Elimination Method
LEVEL III
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
27
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
5.2.2
5.2.3
5.2.4
5.2.5
5.2.6
5.2.7
28
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
29
Appendix C3: Flowchart
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
30
Appendix C4: Prerequisite Analysis
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
31
Appendix D: Rubric
Terminal/General Objective:
After engaging in a two day training workshop the participants will demonstrate the use of the graphing calculator to do operations and calculations in the K-12 syllabus
without assistance and with at least 90% accuracy.
Using a graphing calculator - Assessment Rubric (4 marks each)
Item
Exceeds Expectations
4
The participant is able
Meets Expectations
sequence. The
accuracy without
explanation is
The explanation is
understandable and
mostly understandable
easily followed.
assistance
2. Demonstrate
plottinggraphs using a
Limited Expectations
Below Expectations
1
The participant is only able
0
The participant is not able
at giving a sequence. No
explanation given.
3
2
The participant is able to The participant is able to
multiplying two
is difficult to understand
easily.
The participant is only able
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
graphing calculator
correctly without
assistance.
3. Solve systems of
effectively and
correctly.
32
for example linear.
graphing calculator.
one method.
use of graphing
calculator without
assistance.
4. Read answers produced
by the graphing
calculator correctly
information on
without assistance.
the necessary
necessary information on
information on
polynomials. The
Elimination method.
Guass-Jordan elimination
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
from the Gauss-Jordan
Jordan elimination
elimination method.
errors.
33
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
34
Objective 1: To identify the keys on the graphing calculator used for graphing, solving matrices and trigonometric questions accurately without assistance
1. You need to solve a question using the Guass-Jordan Elimination method. With the use of the graphing calculator investigate which of the following steps will help you in
finding the RREF button in this method?
a. Go to Math, select the MATRX from the matrix menu, go right to select ALPHA B to select rref
b. Go to MATRX to access the matrix menu go right to access the math menu then ALPHA B to select rref
c. Go to Mode, select MATRX to select the matrix menu, go right select ALPHA B to select rref
d. Go to ALPHA select B to select rref
Objective 2: To perform various calculations in matrices, trigonometry and functions using the graphing calculator without errors independently
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
35
2. Your class is planning to make some wooden picture frames for fathers day. The frame will be cut out of a piece of wood; however the area of the frame should be 30cm2.
The inner part of the frame is 6 cm wide and 10cm long. What would be the width x of the actual wood frame? Use a graphing calculator to find your answer rounded off to
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
36
a.
b.
c.
d.
Objective 3: To solve given questions using the graphing calculator with 90% accuracy without assistance.
4. You have decided to take a school trip. You inquire about the prices for teachers and students. You are told that 3 teachers and 20 students cost $150 while 12 teachers and
50 students cost $450. Using the inverse method on your graphing calculator find the cost for a teacher's ticket and a students ticket.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
a.
b.
c.
d.
37
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
38
Appendix F: Learner/Contextual Analysis Worksheet
-2
Greatly impedes
-1
Slightly impedes
+1 Slightly facilitates
+2 Greatly facilitates
The effects are in bold.
Orienting Context
Learner Factors
-2
-2
-2
-2
-1
-1
-1
-1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+2
+2
+2
+2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-1 +1 +2
-1 +1 +2
-1 +1 +2
-1 +1 +2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
Instructional Context
Learner Factors
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+2
+2
+2
+2
+2
+2
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
All trained teachers have training and experience
Increase skills of using graphing calculators
There is some familiarity with the content or prerequisites of it
39
-2 -1 +1 +2
-2 -1 +1 +2
-2 -1 +1 +2
-2
-2
-2
-2
-1
-1
-1
-1
+1
+1
+1
+1
+2
+2
+2
+2
Organizational Factors
The workshop is going to be a bit costly because of the lack of resources -2 -1 +1 +2
Transfer Context
Learner Factors
Participants will be able to better explain the processes to their students -2 -1 +1 +2
There information from the workshop will be applied in the administration of lessons on a
regular basis
Teachers confidence level will be increased in many concepts
-2 -1 +1 +2
-2 -1 +1 +2
Organizational Factors
The workshop will help in improving the reputation of the institute in offering these areas
-2 -1 +1 +2
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
40
This will be another area that can be advertised as being offered by the institution -2 -1
+1 +2
There will be more clients accepted who are studying under the K-12 system.
+1 +2
Revenue will be increased
-2 -1 +1 +2
-2 -1
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
41
Appendix G: PowerPoint Lesson
Slide 1
Slide 2
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
Slide 3
Slide 4
42
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
Slide 5
Slide 6
43
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
44
Appendix H: Advanced Organizers
Advanced Organizers
New Material
Matrix addition, subtraction
and multiplication using a
graphing calculator
Organizer Topic
Differences and similarities in
adding, subtracting and
multiplying matrices.
Type of Organizer
Comparative
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
45
Discuss the importance of the order in manipulating matrices that is, adding, subtracting and multiplying. Wh
Manipulating
Matrices
Manipulating
Matrices
Multiplication
Subtraction
Addition
The columns in the first must match the rows in the second
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
46
Appendix I: Analogies
Analogies
Appendix I1: Analogy 1
An analogy can be drawn between a scoring table of a sports tournament and a matrix.
Description of a matrix
Scoring table
compared with
(Analog)
Format of a Matrix
(Target)
Table
rectangular array
Cells
elements
Team
Win
Barcelona
Real
Madrid
5
3
Los
e
4
4
Dra
w
3
5
Table
Matrix
Pictorial representation
Differences
Tables most often have lines separating each row and column. The elements of a matrix
are not bounded by lines.
Tables are enclosed in a box however matrices are surrounded by square brackets or
parentheses.
In tables the rows and the columns might not always be of the same length nor does the
number of rows on one side have to match the rows on the other. However these are
features of the matrix.
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
47
Rows/
Width
Sky scraper
(Analog)
Columns/height
compared with
Matrix
(Target)
Differences
In a sky scraper the windows are of the same size and type however with a matrix each
element does not have to be the same size or type of number.
A sky scraper can start out with equal amount of windows at the bottom but can reduce as
it goes to the top. With a matrix it maintains a rectangular shape so the numbers of
elements in the rows and columns throughout are consistent.