Professional Documents
Culture Documents
7.95
Sword Beach
NEW COLLECTORS ALWAYS WELCOME PLEASE CALL FOR FREE BROCHURE PACK
With our extensive galleries in Buckinghamshire, California and Normandy we are one of the worlds
foremost specialists in Military and Aviation Art. Please call or see our website for details of our vast range
by the worlds foremost Military Artists. We would be delighted to welcome you at any of our locations,
where you can browse with no obligation in a relaxed and informal environment.
Verville Battery
Stonewall Brigade
INTRODUCTION
Providing a fitting memorial to the 7th Armoured Division, who were stationed in Thetford Forest between January and May 1944 while they prepared for the
invasion of Normandy, this Cromwell IV, nick-named Little Audrey, stands on a plinth alongside the A1065 road in Norfolk, north of Mundford. The Cromwell was
one of the best British tanks of the period, and provided much of the tank strength of the British Army in Normandy. (Simon Thomson)
The War Archives
Mechanised Warfare
British Cruiser Tanks of World War 2
Editor Pat Ware. Design and layout Rob Terry. Scanning assistant Lizzie Ware. Image restoration Paul Sanderson.
Picture credits All photographs from the Warehouse Archive unless otherwise credited.
Published by Kelsey Publishing Group, Cudham Tithe Barn, Berrys Hill, Cudham, Kent TN16 3AG. Telephone 01959 541444. Fax 01959 541400. www.kelsey.co.uk
Printed by William Gibbons & Sons Ltd, Willenhall, West Midlands.
2014 All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is forbidden except with prior permission in writing from the publisher. The publisher cannot accept responsibility for errors in articles or advertisements.
The views expressed are not necessarily those of the Editor or Publisher. ISBN 978-1-909786-31-8
INTRODUCTION
THE DESIGN OF BRITISH TANKS TO 1945
The first tanks appeared on the battlefield in September 1916 but nobody was really sure what to do with them.
By 1939, British tank doctrine called for two types of tank... cruiser tanks that were designed to break through
enemy lines, and infantry tanks, designed to support advancing foot soldiers.
10 CRUISER TANK MK I
Cheap to build, and simple to operate, the Vickers cruiser tank Mk I of 1937 replaced existing medium tanks.
Originally intended as an infantry tank, the Vickers cruiser tank Mk II evolved into an improved and up-armoured
version of the earlier Mk I.
Under the direction of Lieutenant-Colonel G Martel, the cruiser tanks Mk III, IV and IVA were the first to employ
the patented Christie suspension that allowed tanks to travel at high speeds across country.
Officially designated cruiser tank Mk V, the Covenanter was the first British tank to be given a name.
Unfortunately it proved to be unreliable and prone to over-heating.
The Crusader was described as a heavy cruiser and was constructed using as many components as possible of the
earlier Covenanter... but was no more reliable.
12
Like the Crusader II, the Cavalier was armed with a 6-pounder (57mm) main gun, but the addditional weight of
armour proved too much for the automotive components, and the tank was both slow and unreliable.
The Rolls-Royce Meteor powered Cromwell was possibly the first British tank design of the war that that did not
prove to be disappointing. More than 4,000 examples were constructed.
58 COMET
Based on the Cromwell, but mounting a more-powerful 17-pounder (76.2mm) gun, the Comet was fast, wellprotected and hard-hitting... sadly it arrived too late to affect the outcome of the war.
Based broadly on the hull and turret of the Cavalier, the Centaur was designed to allow subsequent upgrading
once Rolls-Royce Meteor engines were available in quantity.
70 CHALLENGER
With its big 17-pounder (76.2mm) gun, the Challenger was an attempt at coming up with a design that could
defeat the heavily-armoured German tanks. A lack of adequate development meant that problems with the
handling and suspension were never resolved.
74 CENTURION
The Centurion was the best British tank of World War 2... unfortunately, it was not completed in time to see any
action. Nevertheless, the Centurion remained in production for 20 years and proved enormously successful.
14
For almost the entire duration of the conflict, British industry was unable to manufacture sufficient numbers of
tanks, and thousands were supplied by the USA in the form of the M3 Lee/Grant and the M4 Sherman.
88 HEAVY TANKS
Since the mid-1930s, British tank doctrine had called for a mix of medium and light tanks, with the former
described either as cruisers or infantry tanks. Light tanks were largely discontinued after 1940 but, as German
tanks grew ever more monstrous, it seemed that the age of the heavy tank was not over.
Despite the, inevitably muddled tank policy of the immediate post-war years, the most successful British tank
of the period was the Centurion, which had started life being described as a cruiser... but the appearance of the
massive Soviet IS-3 was seen as something of a game-changer, resulting in the development of the Conqueror
heavy tank.
Contents
24
30
70
44
46
83
94
58
Dating from 1917, the Renault FT-17 was the first tank to feature a revolving
turret and was, perhaps, more representative of future tank development than
the heavy British machines. Removable tail skids aided trench-crossing
performance.
The medium Mk II was similar to the earlier Mk I, but featured thicker armour, up
from 6.5mm to 8mm, armoured suspension skirts and improved accessibility to
the engine. Some of these tanks were still in use as training aids as late as 1941.
Designed as a possible replacement for the medium Mk II, the A6 medium tank
often described as the 16-tonner was designed by Vickers-Armstrong in
1928. The 3-pounder (47mm) main gun was retained, and there were machine
guns in small, auxiliary forward turrets. Three prototypes were built A6E1,
A6E2 and A6E3 before the project was abandoned.
In 1930, even before trials on the 16-tonner had been completed, three more
prototypes, this time described as tank, medium, Mk III were constructed by
Vickers-Armstrong. Fabricated using what was described as cement tank armour
(CTA), with a thickness of 10mm, the Mk III was armed with the usual 3-pounder
(47mm) main gun, together with three Vickers machine guns, one installed
co-axially with the main gun. Again, just three examples were constructed.
The A6 was followed by yet another experimental design, now designated A7,
again with three examples constructed. A7E1 and A7E2 were powered by an
eight-cylinder air-cooled Armstrong-Siddeley engine, whilst E3 used twin AEC
diesels. The main gun was the 3-pounder (47mm) weapon that had been used in
earlier medium tanks and there were two Vickers machine guns, one of which
was in a ball mount at the front of the hull.
With the A6, the sixteen-tonner and the A7 all proving way too costly, it was obvious
that a cheaper medium tank was required. It finally appeared, in the form of the cruiser
tank Mk I, in 1936, signalling the beginning of a line of development that would
continue to the Centurion. However, there were still one or two blind alleys to be
explored and one of these was the experimental A14E1 heavy cruiser of 1938. There
was no series production, but lessons were learned that could be put into practice later.
Dating from 1938, the A16 was another dead-end design that was used to
investigate transmission and steering systems. It was effectively a development
of the A13 Covenanter (cruiser tank Mk V) with heavy-duty Christie suspension,
and a Merritt-Brown controlled differential steering system. Like the A6 and the
A14, there were also twin forward turrets.
Strategic thinking of the period recognised that a medium tank was not always
the most appropriate tool for the job and War Office doctrine called for a mix of
medium and light tanks, with the design of the latter based on the Carden-Loyd
Mk VII. Entering service with the British Army in 1929 as the light tank Mk I, the
vehicle was operated by a crew of two and was armed with a single Vickers
machine gun.
The final development of the light tank series, the Mk VI, came into service in
1936 and was widely used during the early years of World War 2, with three
subsequent variants (Mk VIA, Mk VIB and Mk VICC).
Light tank Mk VIA, recognisable by the multi-sided cupola, being loaded onto a
six-wheeled truck during some kind of public demonstration. Note the coil
spring Horstman suspension system.
10
CRUISER TANK Mk I
The cruiser tank Mk I was designed by
Sir John Carden of Vickers-Armstrong in
1934 to meet a General Staff Requirement
for a medium tank of simple design and
relatively low cost that could replace the
medium tank Mks I and II.
The design, which was designated A9 by
the Department of Tank Design, was based
on work that had been carried out by
Vickers for the cancelled medium tank Mk
III (A6), and the tank went into limited
production in 1937. A total of just 125
examples were constructed, 50 by Vickers
and 75 by Harland and Wolff, before it was
superseded by the improved cruiser Mk II.
The boat-shaped hull, which was
constructed from riveted armour plate, had
a maximum thickness of armoured
protection of 14mm at the front (hull and
turret), and a minimum of 6mm, giving a
combat weight of 28,728 lb (13,058kg). The
Designed by Sir John Carden of VickersArmstrong, the A9 was the first tank to be
described as a cruiser and was armed with either
a 2-pounder (40mm) main gun or, for the close
support role, with a 3.7in mortar. Power came
from an AEC A179 six-cylinder engine.
Production started in 1937, and just 125
examples were constructed, but the type saw
some action in France and the Middle East.
CRUISER TANK Mk I
Cruiser Mk I photographed from the
side. This example, which is clearly
operating in the desert, has been
fitted with extended sand skirts.
Above: Photographed in France in May 1940, this knockedout cruiser Mk I belonged to the British 1st Armoured
Division.
Right: Cruiser tank Mk I photographed in action in the
Middle East. Note the twin Vickers machine guns carried in
twin auxiliary turrets flanking the opened drivers hatch.
11
12
across country.
The 2-pounder (40mm) main gun of the A9
was retained, together with the co-axial
0.303in Vickers machine gun, but the auxiliary
turrets were deleted. In the Mk IIA variant,
which appeared in 1940 after just 13
examples had been built, the mount for the
main gun was redesigned, and the co-axial
Vickers machine gun was replaced by a Besa
7.92mm machine gun, with a second gun of
this type mounted in the nose, alongside the
driver. As with the A9, there was also a
close-support variant (cruiser Mk IIA CS)
armed with a 3.7in howitzer and two 7.92mm
Besa machine guns. By removing the third
machine gun, it was possible to reduce the
crew to five men, consisting of commander,
gunner, loader, driver, and hull machine
gunner.
The basic automotive details and
suspension were identical to the cruiser Mk I,
13
14
Rear view of the A13E2 prototype showing the twin exhaust systems of the Nuffield Liberty V12 aero
engine, the characteristic large-diameter road wheels, and the curious flat track sections.
15
16
The cruiser Mk IV was used by the 1st Armoured Division in France, where this example was photographed busy demolishing a house, as well as in Libya. The type
had an excellent top speed, but was not particularly reliable.
17
Wonderful period cut-away illustration of the medium Mk IV from the rear, showing the position of the Liberty V12 aero engine and the accommodation provided for the four-
ided for the four-man crew. Note the German armoured car pushed into the ditch as the Tommies sweep by.
The major change between the Mk III and the Mk IV (A13 Mk II) lay in the design of the turret, which, on the Mk IV and the subsequent Mk IVA, had additional armour and featured under-cut sides. Initially, the arm
des. Initially, the armaments were unchanged, but the Mk IVA had a 7.92mm Besa machine gun in place of the previous Vickers.
22
23
24
25
26
27
The angle of this photograph emphasises the low profile of the Covenanter hull, achieved through the use of a
horizontally-opposed engine.
The cooling problems meant that the Covenanter was never really satisfactory as a gun tank, but the chassis
was also developed for use as a bridgelayer. Here, the 30-foot (9.15m) long scissor bridge is raised on the
hydraulic ram ready to be launched across the gap.
28
30
The pilot model for the A16 Crusader (cruiser tank Mk VI) was completed in March 1940, with a total number
of 5,300 tanks manufactured once production got underway. The pilot model suffered from overheating,
inadequate ventilation and problems with the gearchange.
31
32
33
34
Period coloured
postcard showing a
Crusader I at speed.
35
Crusader I being towed by an experimental 6x6 modification of the Scammell R100 Pioneer. Normally equipped with a 6x4 drive-line, this particular Scammell
variant was intended for use as a heavy artillery tractor.
36
Below: The anti-aircraft variant of the Crusader was produced in four versions,
with either a single 40mm Bofors gun or twin 20mm Oerlikon cannons; a
training version was also produced with triple Oerlikon cannons. The
photograph shows the Crusader III, AA (anti-aircraft) Mk II with a new turret
carrying twin Oerlikon cannons.
37
42
BOOK CLUB
To order call 08454 504920
2
13.49 RRP 17.99
7
13.49 RRP 17.99
10
11
12
12.74 RRP 16.99
25%
5
5.99 RRP 7.99
9
9.74 RRP 12.99
14
13
12.74 RRP 16.99
Name of book
RRP
Sub price
BOOK CLUB
ORDER COUPON
Postage* Total
____
13.49
______
______
____
14.99
11.24
______
______
____
3. Bedford at War
16.95
12.71
______
______
____
7.99
5.99
______
______
____
8.99
6.74
______
______
____
17.99
13.49
______
______
____
18.99
14.24
______
______
____
12.99
9.74
______
______
____
10.50
7.87
______
______
____
9.99
7.49
______
______
____
16.99
12.74
______
______
____
16.99
12.74
______
______
____
16.99
12.74
______
______
____
19.99
14.99
______
______
GRAND TOTAL
______
*POSTAGE: Postage rate per book: UK 2.00 Europe: 4.00 ROW 7.00
Maestro only
Card Number:
Security no:
Maestro issue:
Valid from:
Expiry date:
Card holder:
Signature:
Title: _____ First name: ________________ Surname:
Address:
Postcode:____________________ Tel:
Email:
Subscriber no:
Kelsey Publishing Group Ltd uses a Multi Layered Privacy Notice giving you brief details about how we
would like to use your personal information. For full details visit www.cmvmag.co.uk or call 01959
543524. If you have any questions please ask as submitting your data indicates your consent, until you
choose otherwise, that we and our partners may contact you about products and services that will be
of relevance to you via direct mail, phone, email and SMS. You can opt-out at ANY time via email data.
controller@kelseypb.co.uk or 01959 543524.
Fill in the coupon above and post to: Classic Military Vehicle Book Dept, Freepost RSXY-XXGK-EUYS, Market Harborough, LE16 9EF
Tel: 08454 504920 International Tel: 00 44 1959 542864 Fax: 01858 469 804
44
Retaining the Liberty V12 aero engine, the Nuffield-designed Cavalier (A24, or cruiser tank Mk VII) was similar to the Crusader, but with heavier
armour. Like the Crusader III, the Cavalier mounted a 6-pounder (57mm) main gun, but the additional weight of armour had a negative effect on
performance. Just 500 were built with many converted to the observation post (OP) or armoured recovery (ARV) role.
45
46
Similar in appearance to the original Centaur, Cromwell I mounted a 6-pounder (57mm) main gun and was
protected by a maximum of 76mm of frontal armour.
Rear three-quarter view of one of the development Cromwells (A27M, or cruiser tank Mk VIII) produced in 1942. The Cromwell was designed by the Birmingham Carriage
& Wagon Company, in conjunction with Rolls-Royce, and, although always inferior to the heavier German tanks, was one of the best British tanks of World War 2.
47
48
49
50
51
52
Below: Cromwell VII was a reworked Cromwell IV, with the 75mm gun, that had
been up-armoured with an additional 25mm of appliqu armour welded to the
front of the hull. Wider tracks were also fitted and the suspension was improved
to cope with the increased weight.
53
The Cromwell remained in service into the post-war period. This chart was one of a series produced as part of an AFV Recognition Handbook in 1952; the
document included similar data for the major British, American and Soviet tanks in use at the time.
54
DTD diagram showing the thicknesses of welded plate used in the construction of the Cromwell hull.
55
56
57
Department of Tank Design (DTD) drawing showing outline dimensions for what was described as Comet I... although, there never was a Comet II or subsequent variant.
nt variant.
DTD diagram showing the thicknesses of welded plate used in the construction of the, all-welded, Cromwell hull.
62
COMET
Fast and reliable, the Rolls-Royce
Meteor-engined A34 Comet was the
most successful wartime iteration of the
British heavy cruiser tank concept and,
with its 77mm main gun and maximum
101mm of frontal armour, was almost a
match for the formidable German Tiger
and Panther tanks. The design work was
carried out by Leyland Motors, with the
pilot model completed by February 1944.
Many detail improvements were made
before production started in late 1944,
and, although it was based on the
Cromwell, the Comet was virtually a
brand-new tank.
Perhaps, the most significant change,
compared to the Cromwell, was the
adoption of a compact version of the
17-pounder (76.2mm) gun that had been
used to such effect in the Sherman Firefly.
Designed by Vickers-Armstrong, and
described as the Vickers HV (high
COMET
63
A34 P1.MS pilot model viewed from the right-hand side. Note how the 77mm
gun requires a completely-new design of cast turret.
By the time the Comet entered production, so many changes and improvements
had been made that it was virtually a new tank. Most noticeable of these was
the stronger suspension with the addition of four track-return rollers.
Comets were all produced by Leyland at their factory in Lancashire, with total
production amounting to 1,186 vehicles.
64
Sectional view through the Comet showing the driving compartment
at the front, the turret and fighting compartment in the centre, and
the engine and transmission located at the rear.
Liberally draped with camouflage netting, this Comet demonstrates the length of the barrel
on the hard-hitting 77mm gun.
COMET
Cresting a small rise, this Comet demonstrates the weakness of most armoured
fighting vehicles... the relative lack of protection to the armoured floor, which,
in this case, is just 14mm thick. Any experienced tank commander would avoid
exposing the belly of his tank to the enemy.
DTD drawing showing the arrangement of the Rolls-Royce Meteor V12 engine, the David Brown
five-speed gearbox and the controlled-differential system as installed in the engine compartment
of the Comet hull.
Comet TYI 499 (previously with the British post-war registration 16ZR26) was
the last of the eight Comets supplied to the Irish Army. Here, Lieutenant Kelly
demonstrates the finer points of the machine to a group of trainee officers.
(Colin Stone)
65
66
Head-on view of the Centaur I with the original 6-pounder (57mm) gun; in the Centaur III variant, this was
replaced by a more-powerful 75mm gun; a 7.92mm Besa machine gun can be seen to the right of the main
gun, with a similar weapon in a ball mount in the hull.
67
Above: High-level rear three-quarter view of a Centaur I showing the flat rear deck and the air outlet from
the engine compartment. Note the prominent counterweight on the business end of the gun barrel.
68
69
70
CHALLENGER
Experience gained during encounters
with German Panzers in the first three years of
the war had indicated that most British, and
for that matter American, tanks were
effectively out-gunned. The A30 Challenger
was an early attempt at producing a British
heavy cruiser tank with increased penetrating
power that could meet the German tanks on
their own terms. By utilising a lengthened and
widened Cromwell hull, together with a new,
larger turret, it was possible to mount the new
Ordnance quick-firing (OQF) high-velocity
17-pounder (76.2mm) gun, together with a
co-axial 0.30in Browning machine gun.
Birmingham Railway Carriage & Wagon
Company undertook the redesign of the
Cromwell hull, lengthening it sufficiently to
require an extra road wheel, whilst Stothert &
Pitt provided the huge, angular cast turret.
Elsewhere, Cromwell components were used
wherever possible and the Challenger, which
weighed a massive 72,800 lb (33,090kg), was
powered by the Rolls-Royce Meteor engine
driving through a David Brown five-speed
gearbox. The frontal armour of the turret on
the pilot model was a maximum of 102mm,
although this was subsequently reduced to
63mm in an attempt at keeping the weight
under control, with a maximum of 30mm on
the hull.
The inadequacies of British tank guns
became apparent during the campaign
in the Western Desert in 1941 and the
A30 Challenger was an attempt to get
around this problem without resorting
to designing yet another brand new
tank. It consisted essentially of a
lengthened A27M chassis on which was
mounted a new, cast turret carrying a
17-pounder (76.2mm) gun.
The A30 was never successful, and just 200 were constructed. The additional weight placed too much of a
load on the suspension and the sheer height of the turret must have presented a tempting target.
Nevertheless, Challengers were used in northwest Europe in 1944.
CHALLENGER
71
72
View of the breech of the 17-pounder (76.2mm) gun from inside the
turret... the breech components appear to be manufactured from
timber, which would suggest that this is the development vehicle
produced by Birmingham Railway Carriage & Wagon Company.
CHALLENGER
73
The pilot model for the A30 Avenger was produced by Leyland Motors, who were design parents for the A27 series, in 1944, and an order for 230 vehicles was placed
that same year, with deliveries arriving from 1946... too late to affect the outcome of the war.
Even with the curious mild-steel canopy in place, the low, open-topped turret meant that the Avenger was almost two feet (610mm) lower than the Challenger. In
this shot, the turret is traversed to the rear, showing the large counterweight.
74
CENTURION
The fact that design work for the A41
Centurion heavy cruiser tank later to be
described as a medium gun tank started
in 1943 should firmly establish its
credentials as a World War 2 tank, despite a
career that did not really get underway
until 1946. Designed by the Department of
Tank Design under Sir Claude Gibb, the
Centurion was a response to a War Office
request for a new universal tank.
Significant improvements were called for
in the key areas of firepower, mobility and
protection, as well as in reliability and
durability, and the Centurion was also the
first British tank to be designed without
regard to the maximum weight and
dimensional restrictions that had
previously been imposed by adhering to
the railway loading gauge.
AEC Limited was appointed as the
design parent with work getting underway
on a heavy cruiser variant, designated
Centurion Mk I, and intended to mount the
17-pounder (76.2mm) gun that had proved
capable of defeating the heavier German
tanks of the period. A mock-up appeared
in May 1944, featuring a welded boat-
CENTURION
75
Another view of pilot vehicle number 1, showing the cast turret carrying the 17-pounder (76.2mm) main gun, with a 20mm Polsten cannon in a co-axial mount. The
sloped armour at the front of the hull was a first for a British tank, and was intended to be able to withstand German 88mm rounds.
76
The Centurion I was produced at the Royal Ordnance Factories (ROF) at Barnbow, Nottingham and Woolwich; Centurion II was produced at ROF Barnbow and at
Vickers-Armstrong.
Fighting Vehicles
Development Department
(FVDD) drawing showing the
outline dimensions for the
Centurion I and IV.
CENTURION
Rear view of the first Centurion I pilot vehicle showing the rear turret escape hatch fitted to pilot vehicles 1-10.
77
FVDD stowage sketch for the interior of the turret and the left-hand hull front of Centurion II.
FVDD drawing showing the exterior front and left-hand side stowage arrangements for Centurion II.
78
FVDD diagram showing plate thicknesses for the hull and turret of Centurions I and IV.
83
84
Above: British Army M3 Grant photographed in North Africa in 1942. The M3 was in
front-line service with the British between 1942 and about March 1944 and played
a significant role in the fighting at El Alamein. (US Department of Defense)
Above: Designed for a crew of six, the first version of the M3 had a riveted hull...
a manufacturing technique that was also still being used for British tanks at
the time There were five subsequent variants (M3A1 thru M3A5), with
differences in the method of construction riveted, cast or welded hull and in
the engine. Not all were supplied to the British. (US Department of Defense)
85
With a pilot model constructed by the Lima Locomotive Works in February 1941, the M4 Sherman was a replacement for the earlier M3 Lee/Grant. Although the
lower part of the hull and the automotive arrangements were derived from the M3, the 75mm gun was now mounted in a rotating turret. This example is a
Ford-built M4A3, but the tank was also built by nine other companies, with both cast- and welded-hull versions produced. (Ford Motor Company)
Sectional drawing of the GM-built Sherman M4A2, which was powered by a pair of water-cooled Detroit Diesel 6-71 truck engines operating through a common
transmission. Other engines included the Ford GAA V8, Chrysler A-57 30-cylinder multi-bank, and a Wright or Continental R-975 air-cooled radial; there was also an
experimental Caterpillar air-cooled radial diesel.
86
Above: The original 75mm gun was eventually superseded by a 76mm weapon that,
unfortunately, proved to be little better. There was also a Sherman close-support variant
equipped with a 105mm howitzer. The photograph shows this variant, in M4A3 guise, in British
Army service. (Tank Museum)
Left: Whilst the US Armys nomenclature for Shermans is complex enough, the British Army
decided it would be a good idea to rename them all... thus the M4 became Sherman I, Hybrid I, IB
or IBY, the M4A1 was referred to as the Sherman II, IIA, etc, the M4A2 was described as Sherman
III, or IIIAY... and so on. This training pamphlet covers the Sherman III.
Almost 50,000 Shermans were constructed between
1942 and 1945 and, alongside service with the US and
British Armies, the type was used by all of the Allies,
including these examples operated by the Free French.
(US Department of Defense)
87
88
HEAVY TANKS
The production of heavy tanks had
ended in 1918, with all subsequent designs
described, initially, as medium and light
tanks. The light tank had also fallen from
favour by 1940, by which time, British Army
tanks were being described as either
cruiser or infantry tanks. However, when
Britain had declared war on Germany in
1939 many feared a return to trench
warfare, realising that, if this were the case,
then heavy tanks, with the emphasis on
their trench-crossing performance, would
be required once again. As things turned
out, World War 2 was essentially a war of
movement... but, nevertheless, this didnt
stop the War Office from commissioning a
real old-fashioned heavy tank.
In February 1940, Sir Albert Stern, who
had been involved in designing tanks
during World War I, assembled a team of
his former associates and set about
designing a tank capable of operating
across the shattered ground that had been
typical of the Western Front. Dubbed TOG
meaning the old gang the first
prototype, TOG I, was produced by William
Foster & Company, and was ready for trials
in October 1940. Featuring un-sprung
wrap-around tracks, the tank was powered
by a 600bhp Paxman-Ricardo 12-cylinder
diesel engine, driving a pair of generators
that fed power to electric motors, giving
the machine a maximum speed of 8.5mph
(14km/h). It had originally been planned to
incorporate sponson-mounted guns but,
when the prototype appeared, these had
been replaced by the turret of a Matilda II
infantry tank mounting a 2-pounder
(40mm) main gun, together with a hull-
Named TOG for the old gang design team who produced it, TOG I was a heavy tank intended for fighting in
the typical trench conditions that had prevailed on the Western Front during World War I. In its original
form, there was a 77mm gun in the nose, with a turret-mounted 2-pounder (40mm) borrowed, in its
entirety, from the A12 Matilda infantry tank; side sponsons were also intended to house a pair of 2-pounder
(40mm) guns. The drive system was originally diesel-electric using a Paxman-Ricardo V12 engine coupled to
a pair of generators and electric motors.
mounted 17-pounder (76.2mm). TOG 1
became TOG IA when it was subsequently
fitted with a hydraulic drive system.
A second prototype, TOG II, appeared in
March 1941, using the original dieselelectric drive system, but with lower tracks.
TOG II initially carried a square turret
mounting a 6-pounder (57mm gun), but
this was subsequently replaced by the
Stothert & Pitt turret intended for the
Challenger, with a 17-pounder (76.2mm)
gun. A planned TOG IIR, which would have
been shorter and equipped with torsionbar suspension, was never completed...
TOG II had lowered tracks, and mounted a much larger turret which carried
a 6-pounder (57mm) gun; it was also intended that there would be side
sponsons, but, as with TOG I, these were never completed.
HEAVY TANKS
89
Based on a widened and strengthened A27M Cromwell hull, the A33 heavy assault tank or Excelsior was
constructed in 1943. The track and suspension system used on the first example to be built was a version of
that used on the American M6 heavy tank; the second vehicle used a strengthened Cromwell-type
suspension.
90
Just two pilot vehicles for the A33 project were constructed and there was no series production. The project was abandoned in 1944.
Although it was originally envisaged
that a 6-pounder (57mm) would be
used, by the time the prototypes
appeared this had been superseded by
a 75mm gun, together with two
7.92mm Besa macine guns, one
installed co-axially in the turret.
HEAVY TANKS
The A39 Tortoise was a heavy assault tank although these days it would be considered a self-propelled gun designed to take on the biggest German
tanks and tank destroyers. The hull consisted of a one-piece huge casting, with the gun carried in a ball mount at the front; power came from a
Rolls-Royce Meteor engine and the machine rode on 16 pairs of bogies either side. This wooden mock-up was produced in 1943/44.
91
92
HEAVY TANKS
93
94
95
In August 1945, with the war in Europe over, contracts were issued for 100 examples of the A41* Centurion Mk
I with the 17-pounder (76.2mm) gun in a rolled-steel turret, and 100 examples of the A41A Centurion Mk 2
with a cast turret. The photograph shows the first production A41* at the Royal Ordnance Factory, Woolwich.
96
Designed to be able to wade into deep water, the Centurion beach armoured
recovery vehicle (BARV) replaced a similar vehicle based on the M4 Sherman,
and was intended to keep beaches clear of disabled vehicles during amphibious
assaults.
The Centurion hull, in both Mk 3 and Mk 5 configuration, was also used as the basis of a bridgelayer, mounting a Class 80 bridge, tank, number 6. Consisting of
parallel trackways, the 52ft (15.86m) long bridge was deployed by means of hydraulics driven by an auxiliary engine.
97
Whilst the details of the Conqueror project were being finalised, the FV221 Caernarvon appeared, using the Conqueror hull onto which was mounted a Centurion turret.
98
The abandoned FV200 project was used as the basis for the FV214 Conqueror heavy gun tank. Intended as a response to the appearance of the Soviet IS-3 tank, the
Conqueror mounted a 120mm gun; the maximum thickness of armour on the welded hull was 178mm.
FV3802 was a self-propelled gun that used a shortened version of the Centurion chassis, mounting a 25-pounder (87.6mm) gun in an armoured box-like
superstructure. The vehicle was prototyped, but never put into production.
3.99
WWW.CMVMAG.CO.UK
FREE CMV APP AND SAMPLE ISSUE
A 12 ISSUE SUBSCRIPTION IS ONLY 28.99
AVAILABLE ON THE APP STORE AND POCKETMAGS.COM
7.95
AVAILABLE NOW
AT WHSMITHS OR AS A
DIGITAL DOWNLOAD
SEARCH WAR ARCHIVES