Nowadays, crime has increased in many countries and there has

been some discussion (debate, controversy) about types of

punishment. Although some people believe that punishments
should be fixed, others think that punishment depends on
the situation.
First of all, there are people who think that fixed punishments are
fair. That means that everyone will understand the consequences
if they commit crimes, because they are equal. Secondly, this
kind of punishment could reduce crime levels, on account of
everybody knowing the results of committing specific crimes,
such as murder, theft or other crimes with serious punishments
like the death penalty. This would make people frightened of
committing these crimes. Finally, having fixed punishments will
help the government or juries with the legal process, due to there
being fewer possible choices to make.
On the other hand, people who believe that punishment is
dependent on the situation might say that desperation can
lead to crime, and that this kind of crime should carry a lesser
punishment. For example, when a homeless person commits a
crime to fulfil their basic needs, they should not be as responsible
as a person who commits a crime for no reason. Also, crimes of
passion should be punished less, because these people are not
under emotional control. Finally, teenagers should be treated
differently because of their minds not being fully developed.
In conclusion, although fixed punishments might make solutions
easier, I believe that punishments should depend on the
circumstances of crimes.