Names: ______Daniel Williams____________ Date: _September 30, 2015__

Deer Dilemma
Modified from Project Wild
Crystal Lake Park is a 850-acre multiple use park in Suburbanville, USA. The park has several soccer
fields, a baseball complex, and a small lake used for fishing and canoeing. There is a nice picnic area
adjacent to the lake. Nature trails exist around the lake, and the upper end of the lake is composed of a
small wetland renowned for its excellent bird watching. Several nature trails exist in the forested portion
of the park, but about 70% of the park is seldom, if ever, entered by park visitors.
The park is bordered on the southern and eastern sides by subdivisions. To the west lies the last
remaining farm in this portion of the country. The Wolfpack River bounds the northern portion of the
area.

Residents of the neighboring subdivisions, along with Charlie Fields, who owns the farm, have
petitioned the local Board of Commissioners to do something about the ever-increasing deer population in
the park. Mr. Fields currently allows hunting on his property but complains that the deer can escape into
the park when the hunting starts. He also claims that very few deer are taken each season by hunters on
his farm. He has received nuisance animal permits in the past that allow him to shoot the deer at night
when they are eating his crops. Mr. Fields does not like this option but feels he must shoot the deer to
protect his farm.
The residents of the local subdivisions have tried everything from fencing to repellants to feeding the deer
to keep them away from their flowers and out of the roads. Many feel that legal control is needed,
although others have moral objections to this idea. Park visitors do not want the deer harmed because
they enjoy seeing the herds of deer grazing on the soccer fields in the evening.

Environmental Science Teaching Resource

Page 1

www.aurumscience.com

The Board of Commissioners has called a public meeting to listen to the concerns of their constituents and
ultimately make a decision concerning this issue. State laws do not prohibit hunting in this park, so a
decision must be made at the local level.

Community Members Attending the Meeting

Charlie Fields
Mr. Fields is the local farmer. His family has farmed this land for three generations, and he plans to pass
the farm along to his children. He grows mostly grain crops on his farm. For the past 5 years, he has
experienced considerable loss from deer eating his crops. Mr. Fields leases the hunting rights on his farm
to a local group of hunters. The hunters have told Mr. Fields that they see very few deer during the
hunting season because they all appear to move into the park. Mr. Fields is frustrated and would like the
county to open the park to hunting in order to reduce the density of deer.
Dorothy Right
Mrs. Right is a local attorney who lives in one of the adjacent subdivisions. Mrs. Right enjoys hiking in
the park during the evening hours with her two children. She is very concerned about the idea of hunting
occurring adjacent to their subdivision and doesnt want any harm to come to her children. Mrs. Right
does not oppose the legal removal of deer from the park; she just wants to be sure things are done safely.
Michael Green
Mr. Green is a resident of the local subdivision and an avid gardener. His roses were once award-winning
and the envy of his friends and neighbors. Now his roses are food for the local deer herd. He is very
upset and has tried several forms of repellants and fences to no avail. Mr. Green hates the deer and sees
no value in their presence. He is supportive of removing all deer from the park.
Bob Stats
Dr. Stats teaches environmental biology at the local university, where he also does research on wildlife
populations and factors that affect population changes. He is familiar with different aspects that can affect
the population growth of animals. This includes birth rates, predation, starvation, emigration,
immigration, and carrying capacity. He is aware of the exponential growth experienced by the deer
population during recent years and consequences of that type of growth, including dieback.
Betty Bumper
Ms. Bumper lives at the end of a country road in an area that is quickly becoming developed with new
housing. Her work schedule demands that she be on the road at sunrise and at dusk when the deer appear
to be the most active. Therefore, she has hit several deer, and her auto insurance has increased
dramatically. She is supportive of whatever means necessary to diminish the deer population.

Environmental Science Teaching Resource

Page 2

www.aurumscience.com

Community Members Attending the Meeting

Virginia Odon
Ms. Odon is a freelance writer for a nature magazine and has a lot of background with local animals and
plants. She understands many aspects of the biology of the deer, including their mating habits, the
number of offspring they have, how they attract each other, their preferred food source, and their most
common predators. She is attending the meeting because she wants to help the council make an informed
opinion on what to do with the deer.
Don Dearlove
Mr. Dearlove is a vegetarian and a member of an animal rights organization that believes that the hunting
of animals for any reason is cruel and unnecessary. He enjoys seeing the deer in the area, but is concerned
about the potential for accidents and the health of the deer herd if they become overpopulated. He feels
that alternative, non-lethal control methods should be used.
Lynn Ranger
Ms. Ranger is a park naturalist who can testify about the reduction in plant diversity in the park due to the
overgrazing of the deer herd. She has documented evidence about some plants that are now endangered
or threatened due to the deer, and feels that some action must be taken to protect the plant life.
John Dodds
Mr. Dodds son contracted Lyme disease last year, and he blames the deer. In researching his sons
disease, he found out that the ticks that spread lyme disease depend on white-tailed deer for successful
reproduction. He is in favor of any means necessary in reducing the deer population.
Brad Arms
Mr. Arms is one of the people who hunt on Charlie Fields land. He believes that the best way to manage
the deer herd is to allow regulated hunting in the park. He also sees this as an opportunity to provide
hunter education to the community. He is willing to pay for the opportunity to hunt in the park and donate
a portion of the meat he harvests to the local food shelter.

Environmental Science Teaching Resource

Page 3

www.aurumscience.com

Preparing for the Meeting

1. Prepare an opening statement that introduces yourself, explains your background, why you are at
the meeting, and why it is important to you that the deer population be controlled.
Hi, my name is John Dodds. I live in the area of these deer. My son has just recently been
diagnosed with lyme disease. I am here to help reduce the deer population so that the ticks causing
the lyme disease wont be able to produce and therefore, no lyme disease in the area.
______________________________________________________________________________
2. Based on your characters background, state your position on how the deer should be controlled.
Include more than one method that you would find acceptable. List the benefits of the control
methods you have in mind.
I believe the deer should be controlled by hunting. The more people hunt the deer, the harder it
will be for ticks to reproduce, no lyme disease, and the overall population would decrease. Another
method would be relocation. We could tranquilize the deer and relocate them to a different area
and still get the same benefits.
3. For each of the other people attending the meeting, predict what their response will be to your
control ideas. Will they support your ideas or argue against them? Try to anticipate the arguments
they will make, so you are better prepared for the meeting.
Individual
Charlie Fields

Support you or Against you?

Supporter

Dorothy Right

Against

Michael Green

Supporter

Bob Stats

Supporter

Betty Bumper

Supporter

Virginia Odon

Supporter

Don Dearlove

Against

Environmental Science Teaching Resource

Page 4

Likely Arguments
Allow hunting on the farm to reduce the
population because its one of the best ways
to reduce it.
Opposed to hunting because it could be
dangerous for her children to be outside
while people are hunting.
Kill all the deer and relocate as many as
possible so his roses wont be eaten
He knows why the population is increasing
and knows how to decrease it
More hunting and relocating is a good idea
because the deer are all over the roads at
night.
Relocating the deer to a specific location
would be the best thing to do.
Killing is the wrong thing to do because it
would harm the animals
www.aurumscience.com

Lynn Ranger

Supporter

Brad Arms

Supporter

Either method would work because it would

save the endangered plant species.
Same view as Charlie Fields because it
would reduce the overall population

4. Prepare a response to any arguments that the individuals at the meeting may bring up against your
idea. For example, Don Dearlove will oppose any lethal control methods.
Dorothy Right is opposed to hunting the deer. The hunting will only be done in the woods. It will
be done away from humans so there will be no danger to anybody going outside. Her kids will still
be able to go outside and be safe, knowing that the deer population is getting under control.
______________________________________________________________________________
5. Write a closing statement. This will be one last opportunity to state your opinion on how the deer
should be controlled, and any reasoning you have behind choosing this method. Remember, you
are trying to persuade the commissioners to adopt your ideas.
Hunting the deer as well as relocating them is the best way to reduce the population. Accidents
will be reduced at night, no more diseases, safer place to live in at night, and plants wont be
eaten. These ways cause no harm to anybody. Deer wont be roaming around subdivisions or
wandering on roads anymore with these methods.
Conclusion
1. After watching this discussion, if you were a completely impartial commissioner, how would
you vote? What method of deer control would you favor, and why?
I would allow hunting as the best way to reduce the population and solve everyones problems for
one main reason. Everything that is born must die at some point. If nothing died, then we would
need more than one earth to hold everyone and everything. The deer need to die in order to reduce
the population. Thats how life was meant to be no matter what people think.

Environmental Science Teaching Resource

Page 5

www.aurumscience.com