Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
Extra-judicial killings in Bangladesh happen in different names. Popularly it is crossfire,
encounter, gunfight, shoot to death, tortured to death and, many others; death in custody, by
name of sickness, heart attack, or suicide seem more safe and relatively easy for law
enforcing agencies to hide killings. Death by heart attack in custody has becoming another
phenomenon in extra judicial killings in Bangladesh.
2. Death of Akramuzzaman Raja Miah: An Extrajudicial killing?
Akramuzzaman Raja Miah (55), president of Ward No 31 of Khulna City Unit of Bangladesh
Jaamat i- Islami, died in custody on 12 October 2015 night by heart attack. He was produced
before court on same day morning and denied bail, brought back in jail in good health, felt pain
in heart at evening, died in Khulna Medical College Hospital at night, according to Khulna Jail
Authority. Raja Miah was arrested by police on 27 September 2015 from his locality Azad Master
Road of the city while he was greeting people on Eid with two of his fellow Nasiruddin Mollah
and Kabir Hossain Nazmul. Later he was shown arrest under section 25B of the Special Power
Act, 1974, a widely known black law of the country, which has no option of bail, and allows
preventive detention and extend the power of the police to detain and interrogate suspects in
the name of State security. Raja Miahs family informed media that the case was false and
fabricated. Khulna District Jail Super Kamrul Islam said, Raja Miah may have been died from
mental obsession as he was arrested in non-bailable section.1
Jamaat-e-Islami in a statement claimed that Raja Miah was arrested and detained by
government unjustly, and negligence and lack of proper treatment paved the way of his
custodial death.2
The death of Akramuzzaman Raja Miah apparently seems like a normal death in custody. But
considering many previous cases, there is lot to believe that Raja Miahs case is an extrajudicial
killing.
3. Omar Siraj killed Extrajudicially in RAB Custody
Omar Sijraj, an assistant director of University Grand Commission (UGC), who had been
arrested by Rapid Action Battalion (RAB)-4 on September 18, 2015, for his suspected link with
question paper leakage, died on 1 October 2015 under RAB custody. RAB demands he died in
heart attack.
1
http://goo.gl/OBnQdO
2
http://jamaat-e-islami.org/details.php?artid=MjMyNjc=
6
http://bdnews24.com/politics/2015/05/03/bnp-alleges-negligent-death-of-its-leader-nasir-uddin-ahmed-pintu
7
http://www.thedailystar.net/chased-by-cops-al-leader-dies-of-heart-attack-14959
8
http://bdnews24.com/bangladesh/2015/01/30/a-52-year-old-man-dies-of-heart-failure-during-rab-raid
6. Statistics
As per Odhikars documentation, in 2010, a total of 109 persons died in custody. 29 died
custodial deaths in reported extrajudicial killings, 05 persons died in crossfire while in custody
of RAB, 02 were allegedly tortured to death while in custody of RAB; 01 person died in crossfire,
20 were to death in police custody while one person was shot dead by police custody. In 2010 15
BDR9 jawans died while in custody. One person committed suicide while in RAB custody,
another one also committed suicide in court custody; 02 persons died in police station and 01
person died in court custody under unknown circumstances. 60 persons also died in Jail
custody.10
Persons Tortured to Death (2009-2013)11
subjected
to
sexual
violence.
The
mutiny,
believed
to
be
triggered
by
long-standing
grievances
of
the
lower-ranking
guards,
broke
out
during
the
BDRs
annual
celebrations
on
February
25,
2009,
at
its
central
Dhaka
headquarters
in
Pilkhana
Barracks.
The
newly
elected
government
led
by
Prime
Minister
Sheikh
Hasina
chose
to
negotiate
a
settlement
rather
than
send
in
a
heavily
armed
response,
as
demanded
by
the
army,
to
quell
the
mutiny.
thousands of suspects. Family members of detainees and the media soon reported allegations of
torture and custodial deaths.13
Reports quickly emerged of severe torture of those detained and a high number of custodial
deaths. A study conducted by Odhikar, a leading and reputable human rights NGO based in
Dhaka, states that at least 47 BDR personnel died while in custody.[62] While some died of
natural causes, many appear to have died from torture. Odhikar conducted its own fact-finding
into these cases, and interviewed family members and consulted medical documentation when
available in each of these cases. 14 Here goes some fact finding reports:
Case of Habildar Mohiudin Ahmed
Habildar Mohiudin Ahmed was stationed at Halishore BDR barracks in Chittagong at the time
of the mutiny. His family lived in rented quarters in Dhaka near Gate 5 of the Pilkhana barracks.
His wife and children say they heard the commotion when the firing broke out. They called
Ahmed, who said things were fine in Halishore, but advised them to go to her maternal home in
Noakhali with the children.15
Ahmed continued working at Halishore barracks until he was arrested on March 22. His wife
Dolly learned of his arrest only by talking to people present during his arrest. They told her that
he had been taken by RAB-7, but no one could tell her where he had been taken. She went to
BDR headquarters, the police, and Dhaka Central jail, but she was unable to obtain information
about him. Dolly tried to reach Ahmed on his two mobile phones, but both phones were
switched off. Dolly recounted to Human Rights Watch how she found out where Ahmed was:
A neighbor told me on May 4 at night that there was a news item on TV saying Ahmed was in the
hospital, and maybe I should go. Then at midnight, about an hour later, I heard on the news that
he had died of a heart attack. I didnt know what to believe so we rushed to the hospital, and
found him dead.
According to Dolly, Ahmed had been in good health until his arrest. When she and her brothers
went to Dhaka Medical College to collect his body, she said it looked terribly bruised. Her
brother, who looked at the body more closely, said that the back area by the hip was completely
black and blue, and there were severe lacerations on the legs and his upper back.
According to his family, a post mortem report from Dhaka Medical College stated that Ahmed
had been beaten on the lower half of his body. The family filed an unlawful death case with the
13
https://www.hrw.org/news/2012/07/04/bangladesh-torture-deaths-jailed-mutiny-suspects
14
The
Fear
Never
Leaves
Me|
Torture,
Custodial
Deaths,
and
Unfair
Trials
after
the
2009
Mutiny
of
the
Bangladesh
police. According to his family, the police investigation stated that Ahmeds body had been
found near New Market on May 4, and that he had died of a heart attack.16
Case of Mohammad Abdul Rahim
Rahim, a DAD in the Signals Sector at Pilkhana barracks, was on duty the morning of the
mutiny, organizing the arms and ammunition show for the celebrations. His family heard the
firing when the mutiny started but was unable to reach Rahim until later that afternoon. His son
managed to talk to him briefly on the phone: My father couldnt talk for long, he just said that
he wasnt in a good situation, and that if he managed to remain alive, he would meet us
somewhere outside the barracks. He said just get out, get out. His family managed to leave the
barracks the next day, when the home minister negotiated safe passage out for the army and
others stranded inside the compound.
His family did not hear from Rahim for a few days, but they did briefly see him on the TV news
when some BDR DADs were taken to negotiate with the prime minister. Rahim later told his
family that he had been arrested directly after that, and taken for interrogation by the DGFI and
Military Intelligence. He also said that at one point he had been taken to RAB-1 or RAB-2, he
wasnt sure. He did not tell his family details about his treatment, but described sleep
deprivation, and being forced to give a statement under pressure and threats. Rahim was
transferred to Dhaka Central Jail in March 2009, where he remained until his death in custody
on July 29, 2010. His son used to visit him regularly in prison, and described those visits:
My father was trying to hide from me what had happened to him, but I saw he had trouble
walking, he was almost staggering, couldnt stand. Some of the other detainees told me he was in
terrible pain, and I should bring some painkillers. Rahims family said he had been in good
health prior to this time.17
A post-mortem report indicated that Rahim had died of a heart attack. A police investigation
came to the same conclusion, but the final police report is not yet public. A human rights
observer from Ain-O-Sailish Kendra, who saw Rahims body, said Rahim looked like he weighed
no more than 40 kilograms at the time of his death and that there appeared to be torture marks
on his body.18
8. Obligations of Bangladesh
Torture in the custody of law enforcement agencies during remand is not only a criminal offence
but also a serious violation of human rights. Article 35(5) of the Constitution says that No one
shall be subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment. The High Court
Division of the Supreme Court in 2003 in the matter of BLAST vs. Bangladesh gave 15 directives
regarding interrogation in remand31 and in 2013, the Parliament passed the Torture and
16
Human
Rights
Watch
interview
with
Mazada
Akhter
Dolly,
Dhaka,
September
24,
2011
and
Human
Rights
Watch
interview
with
Fatima
Tujhura,
Dhaka,
September
24,
2011.
17
Human
Rights
Watch
interview
with
Abdul
Barek,
Dhaka,
June
6,
2011.
18
Human
Rights
Watch
interview
with
officials
of
Ain
o
Shalish
Kendra,
Dhaka,
June
6,
2011
Custodial Death (Prevention) Act. However, the directives of the High Court Division and the
law are violated. When anyone is arrested, it is now perceived that person will be physically or
mentally tortured.
Bangladesh is a State Party to the UN Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), but it has failed to submit its report on torture for
the fourth time at the UN Committee Against Torture. Furthermore it has, till 2013, violated its
international commitments by refusing to ensure compensation of victims. In Bangladesh, the
culture of impunity is deeply rooted in the criminal justice system. Successive Governments
have failed to investigate acts amounting to torture, prosecute the perpetrators and punish
them, while victims cannot get the compensation they deserve. Moreover, Bangladesh has put a
reservation to Article 14 of the Convention against Torture regarding compensating the victims.
Without a proper independent system to investigate such violations, without withdrawing the
reservation from CAT and with the present weak criminal justice system, torture is being
continuously practiced by law enforcement agencies, which are protected by the culture of
impunity. The Government seems reluctant to take measures to put an end to custodial violence
and contributes in this way to the perpetration of human rights violations.
9. Conclusion
The issue of custodial death is a major indicator on where a country stands in the index of rule of
law, the fundamental foundation of a democratic society. The AL-led government did not keep
that commitment. Therefore, it has been under pressure on the issue from human rights
organisation at home and abroad because custodial deaths in its regime, instead of going away,
continued with new twists. The victims of custodial deaths were no longer the alleged criminals;
those opposing the government politically also became victims that encouraged the lawenforcement agencies to carry on with their despicable acts with impunity. These agencies also
added new dimensions to their activities by placing themselves, with indulgence of the
government, above the law. In the aftermath of the BDR killings of 2009, nearly 60 of the
accused died in custody. The authorities had said they had died of heart attack. All those who
died were members of a fighting force and therefore no sensible person believed in what the
authorities had said. No sane person in the country and abroad believed in the explanation of
the authorities on custodial deaths.
The country witnessed a spate of killings at the hands of the law-enforcement agencies leading
to the January 05, 2014, elections. By then, these agencies had already been given de facto
immunity with custodial deaths/enforced disappearances and "cross-fire" deaths. These
agencies were given further encouragement to commit custodial and extra-judicial killings and
enforced disappearances because the government told them those actions were against
terrorists. That, of course, was no justification for their actions. By the time the January 05
elections were held the law-enforcement agencies seemed to have the power to do pretty much
what they wanted, particularly with those who differed with the government.19
19
http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/2014/08/03/48238