Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Grade: 1
I. Objectives
How does this lesson connect to the unit plan?
This lesson is the fourth lesson in the unit plan. Students have learned and practiced the previous steps of the QPOE2 model: question, prediction, and observation. In
this lesson, they will review the previous steps and learn about explanation, the next step.
cognitiveR U Ap An E C*
physical
development
socioemotional
R
C
X
X
Common Core standards (or GLCEs if not available in Common Core) addressed:
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.W.1.8
With guidance and support from adults, recall information from experiences or gather information from provided sources to answer a
question.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.1.1.A
Follow agreed-upon rules for discussions (e.g., listening to others with care, speaking one at a time about the topics and texts under
discussion).
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.1.5
Add drawings or other visual displays to descriptions when appropriate to clarify ideas, thoughts, and feelings.
CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.SL.1.6
Produce complete sentences when appropriate to task and situation.
S.IA.00.13 Communicate and present findings of observations.
S.RS.00.11 Demonstrate scientific concepts through various illustrations, performances, models, exhibits, and activities.
(Note: Write as many as needed. Indicate taxonomy levels and connections to applicable national or state standards. If an objective applies to particular learners
write the name(s) of the learner(s) to whom it applies.)
*remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, create
Students have previous knowledge of the first three steps of the QPOE2 model: question, prediction,
and observation. They can recognize and recall the meanings of the vocabulary words at large. They
know how to use scissors, glue sticks, and coloring materials.
Pre-assessment (for learning):
Outline assessment
activities
(applicable to this lesson)
Discussion on the rug of the previous steps; review vocabulary; introduce the concept of explanation,
ask why it is important, and ask if anyone can guess why it would be helpful for scientists to explain
their data.
Formative (for learning):
Students write their explanation of the data on their worksheet before they use it for the craft
Summative (of learning):
I will assess the completion and quality of their explanation statement as part of their craft
What barriers might this
lesson present?
What will it take
neurodevelopmentally,
experientially,
1-19-13
Materials-what materials
(books, handouts, etc) do
you need for this lesson
and are they ready to
use?
Students participate in a
discussion of explanation as
well as create their own
explanation. Students will want
to complete their statement so
they can share it with a partner.
Provide options for self-regulationexpectations, personal skills and
strategies, self-assessment &
reflection
The students will gather on the rug in the beginning, then move to their seats to start the art project
How will your classroom
be set up for this lesson?
III. The Plan
Time
9:30
9:35
9:40
1-19-13
Components
Motivation
(opening/
introduction/
engagement)
Development
(the largest
component or
main body of
the lesson)
Closure
(conclusion,
culmination,
wrap-up)
Your reflection about the lesson, including evidence(s) of student learning and engagement, as well as ideas for improvement
for next time. (Write this after teaching the lesson, if you had a chance to teach it. If you did not teach this lesson, focus on the
process of preparing the lesson.)
Following suit once again, I must say that this lesson didnt go as planned. My discussion during the first part of the lesson was great
I really got the sense that students understand the new vocabulary or are motivated to work through their misunderstanding and
learn with the help of their classmates what these words mean and how weve applied them in our investigation process.
The review at the beginning was just about the only thing that went as planned. Earlier in the morning when I was talked to Mrs.
Sayre and explained to her what I had planned for the day, she told me she had something different in mind. Even though the basics
of the lesson stayed the same, she changed the whole execution. I always seem to run out of time when I work with groups in the
hall, so I had planned to do the whole lesson as a group. I was going to make sure the students finished their explanation (lab coat)
sheets first, and then use it for their craft. Because their written explanations were the main focus of the lesson and would embody
the things that theyve learned, I wanted to make sure they had that first, and then they could work on their art project later.
Mrs. Sayre had a different idea. What really happened was I conducted a short review with the students, explained the craft and had
students fold their explanation sheets, and then took students out in the hallway. I would have much rather done it as a whole class.
While I dont mind working in small groups, I faithfully run out of time to get through all the students, which makes them fall behind
for the next lesson. One student has been pulled out of the classroom so many times that he has less than a full page of his learning
packet complete. Its students like that who I worry about. Mrs. Sayre said shed take care of that particular student, but didnt tell me
how, or if she needed my help in catching him up.
I strongly believe that if wed completed the whole lesson as a whole group together, it wouldve gone much smoother. However,
there was still evidence of some really good learning going on. Im happy to hear the students using their vocabulary words in our
class/small group discussions. Even if a student gets stuck on a word or a concept, I make a point to not answer them myself, but
have them call on another student or ask one of their classmates for help so that they can learn to rely on each other and get the idea
that learning happens together, not individually.
If I could change one thing about the content of this lesson, it would be to simplify the lab coat sheet. I had three key points that I
wanted my first graders to write: what they learned, what their evidence was, and to use the word buoyant. I explained those things
several times and wrote them out, but it still held some students up. In my revision, I would have only an illustration box and lines
with the word prompts written out (I learned that.., My evidence is,). It wasnt a terribly difficult task for students to write
them out, but very time consuming for some, and time that I felt was wasted.
Even if students didnt completely finish writing their explanations, I made sure to talk to each student in the group before I left to
make sure they understood the concept of what happened yesterday. That way, even if they didnt quite get it down on paper, I could
gauge their understanding of the buoyancy of things in saltwater and the things in freshwater.
1-19-13