Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Motion For Discovery Ex

    Uploaded by

    robert_johnson_48
    315 views23 pages
    DISCOVERY

    Original Title

    Motion for Discovery Ex

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    DISCOVERY

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    315 views23 pages

    Motion For Discovery Ex

    Uploaded by

    robert_johnson_48
    DISCOVERY

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 23
    AFFIDAVIT OF NOTARY PRESENTMENT Wl EAE Delewarestte —) 1s. ent County 1 nth sy of 2015, forte purpose of vereston, the Uinderigned Notary Pb being cormisoned inthe County and tate noted above do certify tat ohnson Roberts: sppeared before me wth the folowing document sted below. the undersigned Notary, personaly ‘ered that these documents were laced in an envelope and sald by Johnson, Rober ‘They were sort by United sates Post Offs Certfed Mal teclpt number 70142870000172645877 anc oF cous faistawes, anos Cy, 16 (inal Action We, 116 803605 soon nose scurvenr = ane See Tsisrumentwas prepared; 777 ae “atorey-in fact, With he Autograph Twines Date 2 wines Date rected without the UNITED STATES por Tie 28 S.C Section 27461). declare under penalty of pear under the ‘Laws ofthese Unfed Stats of America thatthe foregoing ste and correct ‘Without Prejce unto Rights Reserved in Commerce, UCC 1308 NoTAay ATTACHED Paget of2 Using notary fortis document doesnot consis any adhesion, nor does tate My status in any mann TR pave or notary verison ad isetfcation only and not for entrance into any foreign hiction canowieDoment We dovere Ibs eta oty eeocretct JOS see cr “wo Pe Peay Nae tia whe eed ect uoen mer raved meshes ssn be hie who ame aside win asta ot i rae re chootaSeoiged eh ed hse ody hs spate he seman sete he ame. Iya til eo 1 onmision pes eee Page 20f2 INTHE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY [Tartans | JACKSON COUNTY MISSOURT ‘CLERK OF COURTS, JUDGES, PROCECUTORS, DET: LAUREN WHISTON and. KANSAS CITY POLICE DEPT. FOR THE STATE OF MISSOURI os | ‘aon ROBERT LEE JOHNSON JR ©, ) seater , Ses me Defendants), ) } Criminal Action No. 1516-CRO360S } Document ID #1S-KTFA-6 } Warrant 1S-KTARW.2070 . ) ) ) STATE OF MISSOURI, , 16" CIRCUIT COURT OF ) ) ) ) Phaini), ‘TRUTH AFFIDAVIT ‘THENAI r AND. Le ‘Plain Statement of Facts ‘A matter must be expres toe resolved. In commerce trath is sovereign. Truth exprestd in etorm foram Afidavic An Afdayt no rebutted stands a Trath in commerce: An Affidavit ot ‘butted afer thirty 20) dae, becomes the judgment in commerce. A Truth Affidavit, under ‘commercial la can only be sated: by Teuth Affidavit rebuttal (pont fr point) by payment, by ‘urcement,byreoltion,orby Common Law Rules, bya jury. Page oft Petition 1, Johnson dr, Robert-Lee: (aha: Chaska-Apari Btu: EL-Rey), ex relation, ROBERT LEE JOHNSON JRO, concined withal derivatives thereof, am an Autoshthon-Amerzan (Moo) Indienows, Living Natural Dine Human-Being Manifest in Human Flesh othe Ameria, In Propria Persona, Sat burs (SULJURIS, Lat Of his own eight possessing fll social and civil ight; not under any legal “daily, orthe power of another or gardai. Having capacity tomanage one's own ffir ot under Teel dsb to at fr ones sl. Story, Ag. § 2 Reference Henry Campbell lacks Law Dictionary Rosied eon p 1612) a not om de goer, so an, or any other aia corporate const, Bes oscited in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS and writen by te unclean hands of others Linea Desendent ofthe Autochthonal American Beings am Sovereign (SOVEREIGN. A person, body or ‘tc in which independent and supreme authority is vested chit rlr with supreme power: King ‘ther role with limited power. Reference Henry Campbell Blacks Law Dictionary Rene © clon fpis6t) to thin Land and Preserve ALL of my Rights, and believe that in asordance with my retained Rubsmtve Rights, noting all partes of the Peione's Autctthon-American (Moot) {Adeotiation/Stan) and ha am ot, wil and do ot, waive an alien Rights o due proves ct atnshat any acto be dicated in atau delegated jurisdiction and vene. My Stasis mot emporary ins nature nor terminable by mere wll or agreement were tht partis and the state rc oncrned. {have set (va Cried Union States Mai) Lawful Wait of Discovery/Demand for Dinmlaal eprdng the optioned subject mate appearing “Specialy” and not "General STATUS, Standing, ste or conn, Reynahsy, Pennspvanis il Co 150 Cal 629.89. ‘Glo: Te lea clan of indvial rest of te community. Duryenv. Dury, 46 Idaho 1512269 F987, 988 The righ, dies, capacities and incapaciies which determine a person 10 8 [Bven cass Campb, Austin 137, A ozal ersona lationship, nt terporay in it nature not ‘Ehminableat the mer wl of arts, with which hid persons andthe stat are once. Hole ‘eutacbe Reichsbabn Geelichat, 159 Mis. 830,290 N.S. 181, 19, Halo means estas, ‘snme sins the condition or cramstanse in which on ands with regard to is prope. He p80 in ow counry the people are sovereign and he goverment cannot server i relationship 0 thom ting aay teicitaenship.” Perez. Brownell 386 US. 44,7 8S. Ct $6 21 Ed 24 608 (1958) JURISDICTION JURIDISCTION. tis the authority by which courts and jc officers take cognizance ofan desde ‘aos Board of Tastes of Firemen’ Rel and Pension Fund of City of Maret. Brooks, 179 OKI 600, GF P2846 Morrow v. Corbin, 122 Tex. 553, 62 S.W. 264; env. La Coste, CAL 147 F.2d 591,795; Sheldon v- Powel, 99 Fl. 782,128 So. 258, 263; Brodue v, Broder 83 Ri. 40,167 A 108, 106; Reference Henrs Campbel Blacks Law Ditonay Revised #* edition p. 991 “sition Venue ishereby placed in one Super Cou, prsunt o Anise Seton 2 for The United ‘States Repub andthe several Sates, under the Contin; Article VI, and refimed by obligatory Official Ot. Porsintto Arce, Section Hof the Unite Sates Republic Contin Judicial Authority vested in {he Soprene Cour or lower court which has a “Cried Delegation of Authority Order Fo the record, age 2of 21 ‘on the reco, et the record show, its the obligation ofan implied or alleged Public Ocal to protest the People by stom duty. This i the second format request for you to frward a copy of the 16TH. CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI cerified Delegation of Authority Order ‘confirmed by Congres sa fla formal Discovery Per Article 3 Seton 1 of the American Republic Constitution he 16TH CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI venue Does not hve aration in this ater. ‘Lama Natural Pervn, otto be misconstrued as Corporate Person, who maybe fond to have no Righis to be denied, and Tam not ob addressed in all Capa ltr, which by Lam, such grammar indstes 3 Corporation pe the United Sates Government Printing Office. ‘As socity originates with family, 3 does government. Reference / Source of Law Bouvier Concise encyclopedia of lw Rawles 3° revision pg. 1366 Definition of Government. Soietus Republica Ea AI Maurine [Flag ‘+ SOVEREIGN PEOPLE, The political body consisting ofthe entire mmber of ‘hizens nd qualified electors, who, inher colestive capacity, possess the powers lof sovereignty and exercise thom through thee chosen representatives. Se Sett Sandford, 19 How. 46,15 Ed, 69, Reference Henry Campbell Blacks re Dictionary Revised € eon 1568 + “Sovereignty ise ofcourse not subject aw fortis the author and source ‘aw Vek Wo ¥, Hopkins, 118 US. 3861886) "TAKE NOTICE THAT: pursuant to Constitution of the United States ~ Rule S1. Constitutional Challenge to: Missour Statute 195.211. 3. Any persom who violates or ‘attempts 0 violate this section with respect to any controlled substance except five grams or eof mariana ity of ces Bo Transfer 204 now SOS fee 1-0- t (@) Nonice By A PARTY. A pat tat files a pleading, writen motion, or oer paper drawing nto question the constitutionaliy ofa federal or sate statute must promptly: 1) file «notice of constitutional question stating the question and identifying the paper hat rises it iF (A) a federal statute is quetioned and the parties donot include the United Stats, one of its agencies, or one ofits oficers or employees in an official capacity: or (B) a state state i questioned and the parties donot include the tate, one ofits agencies, ‘orone of ts oficer or employees in an oficial capacity: and {@) serve the notice and paper on the Atlorney General of the United States ia federal statute isquestioned or onthe stat atomey general fa state statute is questioned either by certied for registred mail or by sending to an electronic address designated by the atomey general for this purpose. ()CeericaTiON BY THE CoURT.The court must, under28 U.S.C. §2403, cerify 10 the spproprate atmey general that a tatu has been questioned. (INTERVENTION; Ftvat DECISION ON THE MERITS. Unless the court sets ltr time, the atomey ‘general may intervene within 60 days after the noice is filed or afer the court cers the Pages oft challenge, whichever is earit, Before the ime to intervene expires, the cour may reject the rnstituonal challenge, but may not enter a final judgment holding the statute unconstttiona (G)NoFoarerruRe. A party's failure wo file and serve the notice, or the court failure to certify, thes not forfeit a constitutional claim or defense that is otherwise timely asserted, ‘Until December 31, 2016-Distribution, delivery, manufsetue or production of a controlled substance, violations and atempted violations, penalty "TAKE NOTICE THAT: Pursuant to Constitution of the United States; Rule .1. Constitutional Challenge to; TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, § 242. Deprivation ofrighs under color oft. Deprivation of rights under color of law ‘+ $242. Deprivation of rights under color oflaw Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ‘ordinance, regulation, or custom, wilfully subjects any person in any State, Tertory, ‘Commonwealth, Possesion, or Oletric tothe deprivation of any rights, privileges, oF immunities secured or protected bythe Constitution or laws of the United States, oF tO Giferent punishment, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed forthe punishment of zen, shal ‘be fined under thistle or imprisoned nat more than one year, or both; andi bodily Injury reauts fom the ats committed in lation ofthis section or fsuch acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use ofa dangerous weapon, explosives, or ie, Shall be fined under ths le or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both and if Geath results rom the acts committed i violation ofthis section of such acts include idnapping oran attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit ‘aggravated senal abuse, or an attempt t kl, shall be fined under ths ite, or Imprisoned fr any term of years or for ife, oF both, or may be sentenced to death. For the record, onthe record and lt the record show from where do you derive your ‘tuthorty and jurisdiction in this mater ‘ARGUMENT ‘The 5% Amendment requires that ail persons within the Unites States must be given due proces of the lave and equal protection ofthe law: "No Person shall be deprived of due process of aw”, ‘The Constitution fr the United States of America binds all ulicial officers at Arle 6 wherein it does sy. “This Constitution andthe Laws ofthe United States whic shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all Treaties made, or which shall be made under the ‘tuoi of the United Stats, shall be the Supreme Law ofthe Land, and the Judges of very State shall be bound thereby, anything inthe Constitution or laws of any state to the Contrary, not withstanding, “See Clause 2.” Page of 21 ited States Constitution, Article I, Section I~ The judicial power shall extend to ll eases, in ee and equity. arising under this Consituon, the laws ofthe United Sates, and treaties made, ‘or which shall be made, under their authority-—to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public Iministers and consls;to al cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction: controversies 10 ‘which the United Stats shall be a pary--to controversies between two or more sates~ Benween {state and eitzen of another state:-berween citizen of diferent states;~berween citzens ofthe ame sate claiming lands under grants of dferem states, and between state, or the citizens ‘hereof. and foreign sates, citizens or subjects. In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ‘ministers and consuls, and thase in which state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have ‘rignalJursdetion. In all the other cases before mentioned. the Supreme Court shall have ‘ppeltte jurisdiction, bork as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations {the Congres shall make, The trial of all eres, except in cases of impeachment, sll be by ry and such ria shal be held in the state where te said crimes shall have been committed: but ‘when not commited within any sate the tral shall be at suc place or places asthe Congress ‘may bylaw have directed. ‘A respons is equired three (3) days from recep ofthis Writ of Discovery /Demand for Dismiss {f no copy ofthe Certified Delegation of Authority Order is received within the specified time fame this Affidavit of Fact ~ Writ of Discovery sal stand as Law once again affirming that this court does pot have Jurisdition as per itle Article I, Section Il of the United States Constitution, Further I demand, asi my Constitutional Treaty secured rights, a copy of the ‘Oath of Office", Cath of Ethies, and Bond Number for ANY/ALL state/government officals, employees, Judges, rosccutor, agents, clerks, and anyone who has touched or in anyway involved with this case per Amicle VI ofthe United States Republic Constitution and Article I ofthe Constitution ofthe sate of Missouri. ‘Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved there can be no “rule making” or legislation which would abrogate them.”. “MIRANDA V. ARIZONA, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) 91; 865. Ct 1603, When acting to enforce a statue adits subsequent amendments othe present date, the Judge of the mariclpal courts acting as am administrative ofcer and non judicial ‘capacity courts im administering or enforcing statues do mot act jucially, but merely rministertaly”. Thompson v Smith 154 SE 583 “A judge ceases to sit as a fudical officer because the governing principle of administrative law provides that cow's are prohibited from substiuing their evidence, testimony record, arguments, an rationale for that ofthe agency. Additionally courts are prohibited from subsituing their judgement for that of the agency. Courts in labinistrative issues are prohibited from even listening 10 or hearing arguments, presentations, or rational” ASIS » US 568 F2d, 284 Page Sof 21 ‘Ministerial officers are incompetent to receive grants of judicial power from the legislature, ‘their acts in tempting to exercises such powers are necessarily mules." Burns v Sup Ct. SF, a0 Cal I. Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time” and “Jurisdiction once challenged, cannot be assumed and must be decided.” Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. 495 F 2d 906, 910. ‘Once challenged jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it mus be proved to exis.” Stuck v. Medical Examiners 94 Ca 24 751211 P2d 389. ‘There is no discretion to ignore that ack of jurisdiction.” Jayce . US, 474 F24416, ‘The burden shifts tote court to prove jarisdition.” Rosemond ». Lambert, 469 F2d 416, ‘Criminal law magistrates have no power of ther own and are unable to enforce any ruling V.T.CA., Government Code se. SAI et seq, Davis ¥. Stale, 956 S.W.2d 585 (1997) Basso. UPL, #85 F-24906 ‘Under federal Law, whch applicable tall stats, the US. Supreme Court stated that “Ifacourt is withou authority, ts judgements and orders are regarded as mulities. They are not voidable, but simply void and form no bar to a recovery sought, even prior toa reversal in opposition 10 them. They constitute mo jasification and all persons concerned in executing such judemens or Sentences are considered. in la as trespassers.” Brook %. Yawkey, 200 F. 2d 633; Eliot v. Plersol, Pet, 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328,340 (1828) Acts in excess of judicial authority constitutes misconduct, particularly where a judge deliberately iaregards the requirements of ferme and due process. “Cannon ». Commission on Judicial Qualifications, (1975) 14 Cal. 34 678,694 Forte record on the record, and let the record show from where do you derive your authority ‘and jurisdiction n this matter. ‘Asa matter of record, You Private Foreign For Profit Corportion(s rein want of yet have ‘to lawl juadition to hear, present, orto pass judgement in any mater concerning my affairs Under a quasi-eiminal on-santioned tuna of fren private-law process. Such an acts ae Several penal violations, fraud, and in violation of United States Code of Law, Title 18, ‘Chapter 13, Setions 281,242,245 and 42 USC 1983. “The Constitution of these United States isthe Supreme Law ofthe Land. Any law that s repugnant to the Constitution is nll and void of lav." Marbury v. Madison, § US 137 ‘Your unlawful act of Collusion, olor-of-Law Operations Racketeering and Fraud, in ation {o you making Claims and determinations under assumed Jurisition (hat has not been ‘tablished, necessitated the issuance ofa lawful Writ of Quo Warrant’. Said Averment of Page 6of2 Jursdcton / Quo Warranto, pursuant to Regulation Z, was provided with an alloted time for response which has been ignored, is now in DEFAULT, and stands in Law. ‘any Tribunal (court finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over a person and subjest matter, the case MUST be dismissed, Louisville v. Motiey 211 US 149, 298. CT 42. “The Accuse (Court) Bears the Burden of Prof Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ “Whereas In lght of the foregoing Jurisprudence ‘Stare Decisis’ Supreme Court Decisions, Fact, and Law; and counter othe negative and “colrable” sociable conditions instituted by State Persons ofthe Union States Society, there exits a blatant “WANT OF JURISDICTION” on the part of the Union States Rights Republic (U.S.A), it agents, personnel, contactors, and assigns, ee: ‘+ JURISPRUDENCE, The philosophy oflaw, or the seence which teats ofthe principles ‘ot postive law and legal relations. “The individual may stand upon constitutional rights He is ented to cary on his private ‘busines in his own ay. His power to contracts unlimited, He owes no duy tothe tate ‘rt his neighbors to divulge his business o open his door oan investigation, so far tay tend to ieriminge him. He owes no such duty or the stat, since he rescives ‘othing,therefom, beyond the protection of his life and property. Hi rights are such as ‘xisted bythe Law ofthe Land, ong antecedent tothe organization ofthe state. He ‘es nothing to the public so long ashe does not tespass upon thet rights. “Hale Henkel, 201 US. 43 (1905). ‘+ Where private occupational statute exists, as hee, of which the intent regulation of| private commercial oscupations the particular ageneyenforeing that private statute, shall ot apply ty trickery and deceit, and threat and misepresentation, to persons egulted nd ted, nor should it permit any party to do so, in violation of persons right to stay out ‘of compelled contact, when be fs nota person subject othe statute, unless clearly with its words. State v8 Eberhand , 179 P 833; 246 p24 1011 STATUTE, n, An act of the legislature dectaring, commanding or prohibiting Something particular law enacted and established by the wil ofthe legislative ‘partment of government the written wil ofthe legislature, solemnly expressed Sccoring tothe forms to constitute ithe law ofthe state, Federal Trust Co. v. East Hartford Fire Dist, C.C.A. Conn., 283 . 98 98; In re Van Tassels Will, 19 Mise 478, 196 N.Y.S. 491, 494 Washington v. Dowling, 92 Fla, {61,109 So, $88, $91, Tis words used to designate the written aw in ‘ontradistincton tothe unwriten law. Foster v. Brown, 199 Ga, 444,34 E20 530, 35. See Common Law. Reference Henry Campbell Blacks Law, ‘Distonary Revised & edition p.1S81 ‘Axioms are legally in free under National International Law attending thes issues. And this ‘Amant (Natural Person ~ In Propria Persona) doesnot wave any rights; doesnot transfer power “ratorey: and doesnot wilingly consent o any public teal or hearing in any “colorable* ‘elunal venue or noo-Atcle I, unconstitutional jurisdiction, The Oficial Oats, the ‘Obligations, and the Fiduciary die ofall accuses and bound ‘lsimants'to National Law and Page 7of 23 ‘Order, Civilization Principles fixed in Constitution Law, stil tands! Definition and Trth Still Rules. NON-COMPLIANCE isa Federal and Intemational Law offence. ‘+ International Law ~ The Law of Nations: hose maxims or rules which independent politcal soci or sates observe, o ought o observ, in their conduct ioward one ‘nother, Inierational law embraces the principals that regulate the conduct of states toward eachother, the principals that should regulate the rights and obligations of private partes, arising ou ofthe conduct of states to each other, and the principals that should Fegulat the rights and obligations of private pares, when they ae affected by he separa intemal codes of distinc notes, Ls 7 1936 tn Private International Law Inerational lw which deals with te private relations and ‘ight of persons of different nationalities. Reference Source of Laws Websters 1936 i ak “These ar ules of Law to protect and preserve the People and Rights of the People’ fom being ‘ola. Thus, a wilflnes to ignore this fiduciary duy, and violate the Oath asa Trustee of | the Supreme Law of the Land; wherein the Federal Goverament's authority and His authority fr derived. If this tribunal as relied on prior decisions ofthe Supreme Court, you have the perfot defense for wilfulnes. U.S . bishop, 412 US 46 “The elementary doctrine that the constitutionally ofa legislative acti open to attack only ‘by persons whose rights are affected thereby. applies to statute relating fo administrative ‘agencies, the validity of which may not be called ito question inthe absence of a Showing of substantial arm, actual or impending, toa legally protected interest directly ‘esulting fom the enforcement of the stat.” Board of Trade v. Olson, 262 US 1:29 ‘ALR 2d 105 Upon substantial knowledge, there are no rules of law within the United States Constitution, andthe Missouri Sate Constitation, which derives its authority from the United States Constitution, tha gives the 16TH CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, its ‘Representatives, Assigns, andlor dir Officers immunity tothe Supreme Rules established for the protection ofthe People, Thee i, however, State Decisis that absolutely applies tothe 16TH ‘CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, and its Officers. ASIS v. US, S68 F2d 284, ‘Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE S83. Burns v. Sup Ct, SF, 140 Ca ‘As a Quasi-Criminal Court thi Cour as mere appearance or want of realy. In egal ‘hrascology it indicates that one subject resembles another, with which tis compared, in certain harstcristic, bu tha there are intrinsic and material differences between them. (OF which, tll the moe lawful grounds to produce, forthe record, the physically documented and delegated proof of Jurisdiction over Person(s) and Subject mate). “The Lawful definition of Competent Court is: A cout, ether civil or criminal having awful jurisdiction Page of 21 {In regard to courts of inferior jurisdiction, “if the record doesnot show upon its fee the facts necessary 1 give jurisdiction, they wil be presumed not to have existed.” Norman v.Zieber,3 Or at 202403, {tis reasonably and lawfully Demanded and expected thatthe Private Foreign For Profit Corporate Entity sled asthe 16TH CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI td thee BeneficariesRepresentative andor Assigns styled asthe 16TH CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI Abate these proceedings of Collusion, Color-Of-aw, and ColonO Authority. The Exhibits in this cause are evidence, which by Lav, must be reviewed ‘ond ansoered based on ts contents, Is within My Rights as a Moorish American National to ‘Xpcetso upon submission, and it isthe Oathbound Duty ofthe Officer of the Cour to respond in kind lawfully. However, Amy J. Brgunier, County Adminstrator andthe Private For-Profit Beneficiaries Representatives sled the 16TH CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI and their Representatives andr Assign operating here in Northwest ‘AmexenNoethwest Africa! Noth America appear to refuse their duty. and the Courts duty to Jo oval being Trastes of the United States Consition, who have upon prima facie evidence, ‘wsurped their Osthbound obligations oi. US Supreme Court in US vs Minker. 350 US179 at page 187: “Because of what ‘appears to be alanful command on the surface, many citizens, because of thet respect [forvhat only appears tobe a law, are cunningly coerced into waving ther righ, due 1 ignorance.” ‘Asa matter of Fiduciary Duty, County Administrator and all Officers of this Cour Tribunal ‘ac obligated to protect the Rights of Citizens. Infact, the only reason government isin place is to protect the Rights ofthe Citizen, and for no other reason. To utilize the Court fr anything ‘the than that sin ict Treason. “When judge aets where he o she doesnot have jurisdiction to act, the judge is “engaged in an actor act o of treason” US v Wil 449 US 200,216,101 8 Ct, 471,66 {LEd2nd 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, SLEd 257 aszi) “No state legislator or executive or judicial officer ean war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to suppor i.” Cooper v. Aaron, 388 US. 1,78 S.Ct. 1401 (1958). “Therefore, all requests made tothe Tribunal! Court are/were within the bound of Law, and supports the fundamental purpose of any and all government entities and their obligations othe citizens, The Averment of Jurisiction defines such bounds for this Cour. Ifthe State of ‘Missouri which includes the 16TH CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, "MISSOURI, have established, within their private capacity, and/or in consort with some other Association, establishment, agency, sub-charter or chapter, ee; some additonal rues, regulations, Statutes and ondinances, they must act within the La, and cannot abrogate the Supreme Law of the Land, and mus follow the defines of Article VI and they must acknowledge any and all, ‘supportive Supreme Court Sate Decisis, which in fact, and in Law, applies to them. Page of21 RULE, Anstablshed standard, guide or regulation: a principle o regulation Setup by authority, prescribing or directing ation or forbearance; as, the rules of legalative body, of «compar, court, publi office of the law, of eis. A regulation rade bya cout of justice or poli office with ference tothe conduct of business therein, Reference Henry Campbell Blacks Law Dictionary Revised 4 eition 1436 «© ORDINANCE, A rues established by authority: a permanent rule of action; law of Stute In a more imited sense, the term is used to designate the enaciments of he Tegslative body of a municipal corporation. State v. Swindell, 146Ind. $27, 45 NE. 115,3 LRA. 261, Reference, Law ein p24 “An unconstitutional act no lw; it cones orgs it imposes o tes: fords no protection; it creates no office; tsi legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never ten passe.” Norton v. Shelby County, 118 US. 425 p. 42 “The Declaration of Independence defines the purpose of government as having the sole obligation of securing, preserving, and protecting the rights ofthe People, Therefore as public Servants, the only obligation that government has iso that endeavor which is Obligation and

    You might also like