You are on page 1of 13
fice PITC 4999 Manchanaa lay 0 1 DETAINED UNITED STAPES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW IMMIGRATION COURT BLOOMINGTON MINNESOTA dn Tac Mattes : File No: A Th Removal Proceedings. } The Hon. Immigration Judge Nickerson Next. Fearing: March 19, 2015 at 10:00 AM (Mastex Calendar) MOTION TO RELEASE THE RESPONDENT FROM CUSTODY OR, TN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO REQUEST A BOND HEARING MOTION TO RELEASE THE RESPONDENT FROM CUSTODY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO REQUEST A EOND HEARING espo by and throagk der ty . Lez PLLC, ANUS LAW O% sel, HANS nereby pant Respondent release on pond, er Le sckesule a sond hearing ps y persuanz yo TN § 236la} and ig}. Firsl, che Respondent ts not subject ty removal bec: ups informasicn and belicf he did not comrit the czime wilch crlegeced the Notice to Appear. Second, the Respordent is rot sublect to -enoval because upon information and belief he as not peer viel ony or a crime inv of ar aggravate: diag x: sover, he ack subject s wpon infosnasien and lo mercacery ceceition as defined by Section 236(c} (1) 0 Lne a: mere, Resperdent is eligisie for # Eascshiy Farth Weiver asing orm 7-691, Politica Avyium using Form .-5 and Canceliacion of Removal ler Ceztuin Permanent Reaidents vsing Fosm (2A, al of which we inLend to epare ard file with Soth USCIS ana on or bel ais Eonerehls Gor d furcherrore under TWA $ 249 st ceart app alice, upon information and belief he is act an BRIEF FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Respondent remains cezained at the ¥reeborn Councy HeLention Center Located at 421 South Broadway Averus, t Les, Minnesota §6907 ena immigration aad Caslins Fm Fonece & has agen taformatioa umd heileé pluced a acnainer of Lhe Resgondert. At this tine, ae eks a review of kis custody detertinavier He seeks co be released on bis own rec: de a.ternative bo oe Telease: on @ redieccd pond. ARGUMENTS 1. The Respondent is net subject to removal because upon information and belieZ, he did not commit the crime which tziggerad the Notice to Appear. #, the STA he'd that an alien of the Ace if be wepituds thar Was punishable by a tery ol imprisonme: of at leasl 1 year was, oc the date o! tne commission of tha. crixa, presecl in cre Jaited tes pursuatt to an admission thas ed rol. nore than 5 years earlier s Matha Bdel ALYAZIT, 2b I@N Dec. 397 (BIA 2021). Tn son, rereval proceedings again: Respondent sud tertinated for this reagan Placing =e Ré tin removal pyri edi is oper as iL is coanvary te oz Board of tmmiara.i Rpperls prec dens. TI. Respondent is not subject to removal because upon information and belief he hag act been convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude. The 2A s indicated curpitude rsfers gersently + coneuee that is inherently base, vile, or orevec, and contrary the accopt! rules cf serality erd au ¢8 owed betwoen persons or to society in general. terin llecision 594 iBIA 19991; anes, 19 TeX Bec. 669 {BIA 1saRl; Herr 52 F.4d 238 2 F.3d 919, 921 i8ca S985) (mociog that course 4 erihed moral surpilude ir gencrel tesms as Yet et of baseress er dopeavity contuary we ac coted toral ve heen readily sateqerized as norel turmicade. For oxanple, the proms Coart hae neted that “Lzaud cersisteally oeen regarded as such a contaminating can coucls huve, witout comporent in any crive Lhae ine-uded such crimes witsir the scope ef moval De George, 341 0.8. Hoard hae hold the “evil or malicious inzern is said to oe Malter of AoreucSeming, 1Z les bec. iy, 377 (finding Lkac “crimes ia which evil intert ‘s no mattes hew serious the acn ot erces, da not invo_ve roral turpitude’). 2 a crire invel. In dete-miais nviction ate Wneer waich Lie a rurpitade, the apes: 29 Ish bec. coturred is contecllirg. gee (ROR 1994). TE U whick carpilude recesserity inheres, then, fom immigration P.suoses, che ollense is a crime ‘nvelving norel iuspitude. 0 Shozt, 20 18N Dec. 13€, 137 iBLA 1989). hus, paz-ictlar crime invelves coral tuvpituce is by che s suetttory definition ¢ detesnined by Lhe he odie. courte agree that, be dine volves mora? carpitude, immigration Firs « age in a “categorical” inguiry and ro the statule of vietion ra the 3p 3 of an alien’ crise (The Taira Towa-Lo wey Cenezal, Ne, O7-20LL, slip [36 3) has basically rejected locking kayone 96 jorical approach) . 6 appzoaci, the nos , which Tepke Lo whether cozal tuse Laheres qereval naluce ef @ crive; and provebd. ch, waick asks wt necessarily Lnheres in ell cases Lhat have a prokability 07 being prose Ts X Bos. 68 2008! The Taité Circuit cxazines ne least culpable ang under the slatuce and gees who ner that coaduch woule aor, Tn vis case, this dees ner qualify ae e CIML by the elemenl ol intent is xis Lag, 30th BIA ard Lhe whird Clreuit ize intent ises and Jeev-Louis atsorrey General, _ Tr vorelusioa, a veadieg of the relevant stavuie quoted aoove does ast suppert a ading of mors! turpitude according ta the 2car¢ of Immigration Aopeals ard 7 circuit staneard. Upstzu of justice defined by this Federal Stature is net a ex 7 me Lhat is inherennly « y iovelve an evil III. Respondent should be releaged from Custedy under INA § 236 because he is not a flight risk or a danger to the commend ty. Lnser TNR $2368, a being removable ne tp infortation ard heief the Resp: not barred Lor immigration 901d subjec Therefoze, the vrovisione of IEA $236 (x) control th’s vase. Bee equ, 22 Tay Dee. 1107 (Bon sons with criminal who are nsitasr found to o¢ a wigs Lo national sec! cily ner subject ce rardalory B CPR § 286.7 fo) deleation 2 2 enillea ce release anc iB), 1236.1 ¢5} which prov. y release indiviaaal whe car amnene ger to properly ex persona, and appear any Euture procesdiry Li11-13 (RIA 1399), the resperden> is npon infermeLion ans now subject Lo maadstory detention aader 236 [el 11 MR. 3 discussed svove, ang belie sonmis a crime Lnvony yon assuming arguénds that che Resnond involves moral turpituce, Lhe Resp: suoiest .¢ nannatery detention. n detoemining whether co cole: detained tizen, <2 Cour. should cors‘der Lie wouwliizen’s laced aw y tics, tanner ef encry aca -eugth of time in Lhe ted ftaces, onploymens or lack of We eat, crimina cd, evidence of cehebi lit ica, hislory sf prio- n criminal proceedings, menbers ip in community dons, ard finance la. ability to post bond. See, Pate, 13 8M Jac. u commaiiuy in the united che zosp ndert wants to be releaecd or bond so > L ke cua wors, take care of his mily, and take an ac.ive role ng these rowoval processings ane the impact Lhe he on his family. b. Respondent does not pose a danger to society. Phe Sesveadent has uven infoemaci 4 and o: had any olher tzowste wi evner bhan these reced lings. 2 generally lived in the Uaited Steves for 4 nunber wilheat ing! dert In eddittoa, tre Responien does no: have any ties Le -orrortat and/or any arti-goverrment group. ving member of Respondent Ls an up! Mevsever, Resporcens’s family is zeady, willing ana ~ a bond, if necessary. IV. Petitions and Eligibility for Relief a above, cpon ad belief sligible Ler 2 Ha rousing Form I- ation of Forr T-s84, ard Car 2s Reylun asirg seas using Korn 49%, ul and file hoth prepus. pie Court on om delure the next court serance, ana tarthermore under LNA § 240(%) (al because weow inlermation and belief he is nol aa aggravalea fell cuuritued a ceive ot moral carpituce. CONCT.USTON ts thas this tes WHEREFORE, Resoondert respes cL release 2espondert. o1 ais own recognizance cr ta a reduced bond arount detern‘ned in the Court's the altemal!ve, that chia Cacrt s Heerollon, 97 i. seed hearing at which esnoudest » searsel, to larkher er: these potnts. Dated: 3A19/2915 New York, KY {ally suonizced, Kahal Manchands, Mecchanta law Office pine Li State Streel, Suite 4999 ch, New vork 19994 {2i2) $68-BEDd Fax: {212} 968-B692 DHS Chie! Counsel Counsel Rieko ‘lerzy Whipple Federal Bui, Fecers] uc, Suite 185 t Vding, Minnesota 55111 United States Dapartment of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Tmmigration Court Bloomington Minnesota ! & Nuke ORDER OF THE IMMIGRATION JUDGE Jpon consicerelion oF the Respordent’s MOVLOK TO RELRAS? THN RPSPONDERT TROM CJSIODY OR, IN TE Abieare KONG, if Le ITERBY O20kRKID That Lie ce 7 TO REQUEST BON 2 oa ba 7 GRANTED / £9) DENIZD beesu et Une motion not oppose the a response to the wotion nas not bees hike sourt. 1 geod has been escablish nie with Lhe morion, ig aslinely cevion(s) for relief -wu. Lo ousl comply with the DY bioweletes Date Richerson Ton “Siage Persona Servi lien’ s accy/s CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE T, Rahal Manchends, served a 2 The Responce Lor Rona sr, in the 2 Sthedale a Uowd Kearing and any atzected L Soense, © Building, 1 Fecers! ling, Minneseta of this 1, siskop Henry Suite 2 flak Rahal Mane

You might also like