Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Impaired swallowing
AMS
Dysphagia
Soft-textured regular diet
Thickened fluids (nectar)
Assess for coughing/chocking during mealtimes
Assess for residual food in mouth after eating
Oral care
Reduce environmental stimuli
High-fowlers during meals
Encourage to chew slowly & thoroughly
4. Impaired tissue integrity
Bilateral Burr hole drainage on
9/29/15 steri-strips on cerebral
incisions
Exploratory Laparotomy, open
cholecystectomy on 10/9/15
abdominal incision/dressing
Redness in groin area bilaterally
Nystatin
2. Acute Pain
Bilateral Burr hole drainage on 9/29/15
Exploratory Laparotomy, open cholecystectomy on
10/9/15
Pain assessments
Offer pain medication
Evaluate effectiveness of pain medication
Tylenol
5. Deficient knowledge
AMS
Dementia
Disorientation, unspecified
Did not report un-witnessed fall to family
Hx of refusal to go to ER for change in
mental & speech status, & dominant hand
weakness
Hx of restraint needs
Desired outcomes
Interventions
Impaired swallowing
Impaired swallowing
1.Patient exhibits ability to safely
1. Assess for coughing or choking
swallow, as evidenced by absence of
during eating and drinking.
aspiration, no evidence of coughing or
2. Assess the ability to swallow a
choking during eating/drinking, no
small amount of water
stasis of food in oral cavity after eating,
3. Assess for residual food in the
and inability to ingest foods/fluid during
mouth after eating
the clinical shift.
4. Remove or reduce any
environmental stimuli
5. Maintain the patient in high
fowlers position with head flexed
slightly during meals.
6. Encourage the patient to chew
thoroughly, eat slowly, and
swallow frequently.
Acute pain
Acute pain
1. Patient will report satisfactory pain
1. Assess pain characteristics
control at a level less than 3 to 4 on a
2. Respond immediately to reports
rating scale of 0 to 10 by the end of the
of pain
clinical shift.
3. Provide rest periods to facilitate
comfort, sleep, and relaxation
4. Anticipate the need for pain relief
5. Give analgesics as ordered
6. Evaluate effectiveness of pain
medication
Impaired physical immobility
Impaired physical immobility
1. Patient is free of complications of
1. Assess the ability to perform ROM
immobility, as evidenced by intact skin,
to all joints
absence of thrombophlebitis, normal
2. Assess skin integrity for signs of
bowel pattern, and clear breath sounds
redness and tissue ischemia
during clinical shift and hospitalization.
especially over bony prominences
3. Provide a safe environment: bed
rails up, bed in down position,
necessary items close by.
4. Perform passive or active ROM
exercised to all extremities.
5. Encourage the appropriate use of
assistive devices
6. Ensure intermittent SCD is in
place and on when patient is in
bed and teach patient of its
purpose
Evaluation
1. The desired outcome of patient exhibits ability to safely swallow, as
evidenced by absence of aspiration, no evidence of coughing or choking
during eating/drinking, no stasis of food in oral cavity after eating, and
inability to ingest foods/fluid during the clinical shift will be measured by
observing and monitoring patient during mealtimes. This outcome was met
because I assessed for coughing and choking during mealtimes, and there
wasnt any; I assessed for the ability to swallow a small amount of thickened
fluid before the patient initiating eating, which he was able to do; I observed
for bulging in the patients cheeks after meals and asked him to open his
mouth to ensure there was no residual food leftover; I ensured the patient
was not too distracted during mealtimes; I maintained his position in highfowlers during mealtimes, and I also encouraged the patient to take his time
eating and chewing his food.
2. The desired outcome of patient will report satisfactory pain control at a
level less than 3 to 4 on a rating scale of 0 to 10 by the end of the clinical
shift will be measured by assessing pain after pain medication
administration. This outcome was met because I anticipated the need for
pain relief, and after the nurse and I did pain assessments, the nurse
responded immediately by administering pain medication. Then, in about an
hour, the effectiveness of the pain medication was evaluated, and the patient
stated that he did not have any pain before we got him ready for discharge. I
also allowed for periods of rest during the clinical day when possible.
3. The desired outcome of patient is free of complications of immobility, as
evidenced by intact skin, absence of thrombophlebitis, normal bowel
pattern, and clear breath sounds during clinical shift and hospitalization can
only be partially met because I can only account for the time I was assigned
to him even though I think I would have been made aware of any of these
complications during this hospitalization. The outcome was met during the
time I was assigned to this patient though because I assessed the ability to
perform ROM on all joints and encouraged active ROM exercises; I assessed
the patients skin and was intact besides under CDI surgical abdominal
dressing and free of redness; I provided a safe environment; I encourages
the use of his walker each time he got out of bed, and I ensured the
intermittent SCDs were on while in bed and explained the purpose of its use.
4. The desired outcome of patients tissues will return to normal structure and
function after two months of being discharged is unable to be evaluated.
However, I could say that is partially met because the interventions of
assessing the condition of the tissue (from what I could see without
removing abdominal dressing), assessing the characteristics of the incision
(could only assess cerebral incisions that has steri-strips on them but unable
to assess under abdominal dressing), assessing for elevate body
temperature, which my patient did not have, and identifying for signs of
scratching or itching, which my patient did not do, were al performed.
However, I did not perform any dressing changes to be able to maintain
sterile technique and also did not administer any antibiotics.
Discharge Plan/Patient Teaching
1. Placement/type of dwelling: Home
2. Support systems: Wife, daughter, & grandson visited patient while I was assigned
to him and were also who patient was discharged to be taken home with.
3. Assistance needed with ADLs: Patient needs continuous supervision because of hx
of falls that have gone un-witnessed and lead to this hospitalization with the
implication of bilateral subdural hematomas. The patients daughter said that the
patient lives with his wife at home, but the wife is also older and apparently unable
to assist patient with ADLS as evidenced by fall history and also as stated by
daughter. The daughter said she would be moving in with the patient, her father, to
assist him with his ADLs at least until he returns to his previous state of health
before the un-witnessed falls. However, I believe the patient will need to have a livein caretaker if plans to live at home and not in a long-term care facility.
4. Equipment needs: Front-wheel walker, possibly a urinal or commode to allow for
patient to use restroom at night without having to get up and walk to bathroom to
help reduce fall risk, good lighting in home, including night lights, possibly fall
alarms of some sort for home if living with caretaker(s) that can be alerted of the
need for assistance, non-skid footwear to wear inside the home, non-skid surfaces to
be applied to bathtubs/showers and possibly a shower chair, needed supplies to
ensure rugs are secured to floors if decide not to remove them from the home if
currently have them, and some kind of alert necklace like Life Alert or something to
be worn at all times in case falls when no one is around and unable to get up.
5. Patient teaching:
a. How the patient prefers to learn: In Japanese but unable to ask him if he
prefers to be told or shown. However, I assume he would prefer to be told
over shown due to possibly decreased eyesight due to old age.
b. Barriers to learning: Primarily Japanese speaking, altered mental status,
dementia, old age.
c.