To:

Galactic Apartments LLC (info@shirtsforbernie.com)

Subject:

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86813714 - BERNIE FUCKING

SANDERS - N/A

Sent:

12/16/2015 11:58:02 AM

Sent As:

ECOM108@USPTO.GOV

Attachments: Attachment - 1
Attachment - 2
Attachment - 3
Attachment - 4
Attachment - 5
Attachment - 6
Attachment - 7
Attachment - 8
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANTS TRADEMARK APPLICATION
U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86813714
MARK: BERNIE FUCKING SANDERS

*86813714*

CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:
BLOUNT, PATRICK
GALACTIC APARTMENTS LLC
848 N. RAINBOW BLVD #1800
LAS VEGAS, NV 89107

CLICK HERE TO RESPOND TO THIS

LETTER:
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp

VIEW YOUR APPLICATION FILE

APPLICANT: Galactic Apartments LLC
CORRESPONDENTS REFERENCE/DOCKET
NO:
N/A
CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS:
info@shirtsforbernie.com

OFFICE ACTION
STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER
TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANTS TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO
MUST RECEIVE APPLICANTS COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS
OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 12/16/2015

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS TO MAINTAIN LOWER
FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING
DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus
or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to
Office actions (see TMEP 819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a
valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail
throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. 2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP 819, 820.
TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional
processing fee of $50 per international class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. 2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c),
2.23(c); TMEP 819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may
respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiners amendment by telephone without incurring this
additional fee.
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant
must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. 1062(b); 37 C.F.R. 2.62(a),
2.65(a); TMEP 711, 718.03.
SECTION 2(A) SCANDALOUS REFUSAL
Registration is refused because the applied-for mark, BERNIE FUCKING SANDERS, consists of or
includes immoral or scandalous matter. Trademark Act Section 2(a), 15 U.S.C. 1052(a); see TMEP
1203.01.
The words immoral and scandalous may have somewhat different connotations; however, immoral
matter has been included in the same category as scandalous matter. TMEP 1203.01; see In re
McGinley, 660 F.2d 481, 484 n.6, 211 USPQ 668, 673 n.6 (C.C.P.A. 1981) (Because of the courts
holding that appellants mark was scandalous, it [was] unnecessary to consider whether appellants
mark [was] immoral. [The court] note[d] the dearth of reported trademark decisions in which the term
immoral [had] been directly applied.).
For a mark to be scandalous, the evidence must show that the mark would be considered shocking to
the sense of decency or propriety, giving offense to the conscience or moral feelings, or calling out for
condemnation. In re Fox, 702 F.3d 633, 635, 105 USPQ2d 1247, 1248 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (quoting In re
Mavety Media Grp. Ltd., 33 F.3d 1367, 1371, 31 USPQ2d 1923, 1925 (Fed. Cir. 1994)); see TMEP
1203.01.
A mark is scandalous when the evidence demonstrates that a substantial composite of the general public
(although not necessarily a majority) would consider the mark to be scandalous in the context of
contemporary attitudes and the relevant marketplace. See In re Fox, 702 F.3d at 635, 105 USPQ2d at
1248 (quoting In re Mavety Media Grp. Ltd., 33 F.3d at 1371, 31 USPQ2d at 1925-26); In re The
Boulevard Entmt, Inc. , 334 F.3d 1336, 1340, 67 USPQ2d 1475, 1477 (Fed. Cir. 2003); TMEP 1203.01.
In this case, applicant seeks registration of BERNIE FUCKING SANDERS for Clothing, Artwork.
The applied-for mark contains the term FUCKING. As seen from the attached excerpt taken from
www.macmillandictionary.com, the term fucking is an extremely offensive expression used to
emphasize what you are saying, especially to show anger. Moreover, also see dictionary definition from
Merriam-Webster.com and the American Heritage Dictionary [ahdictionary.com] supporting that the term

fucking is considered obscene or vulgar term. Therefore, the word fucking in the applied-for mark
is scandalous because it is vulgar.
Evidence that a mark is vulgar is sufficient to establish that the mark is scandalous within the meaning of
Trademark Act Section 2(a). In re Fox, 702 F.3d 633, 635, 105 USPQ2d 1247, 1248 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
(citing In re The Boulevard Entmt, Inc. , 334 F.3d 1336, 1340, 67 USPQ2d 1475, 1477 (Fed. Cir. 2003));
see In re Michalko, 110 USPQ2d 1949, 1951 (TTAB 2014); TMEP 1203.01.
The presence of other wording in the mark does not detract from the vulgar and scandalous nature of the
wording FUCKING. Accordingly, registration is refused under Section 2(a) of the Trademark Act. A
mark that is deemed scandalous under Trademark Act Section 2(a) is not registrable on either the
Principal or Supplemental Register. TMEP 1203.01; see 15 U.S.C. 1052(a).
SECTION 2(C) CONSENT REFUSAL
Registration is also refused because the applied-for mark consists of or comprises a name [BERNIE
SANDERS] identifying a particular living individual [Bernie Sanders] whose written consent to register
the mark is not of record. Trademark Act Section 2(c), 15 U.S.C. 1052(c); TMEP 1206; see In re
Nieves & Nieves LLC, 113 USPQ2d 1639, 1649-50 (TTAB 2015); In re Hoefflin, 97 USPQ2d 1174,
1175-76 (TTAB 2010).
For purposes of Section 2(c), a name in a mark identifies a particular living individual if the person
bearing the name will be associated with the mark as used on the goods or services because: (1) the
person is so well known that the public would reasonably assume a connection between the person and
the goods or services; or (2) the individual is publicly connected with the business in which the mark is
used. In re Nieves & Nieves LLC, 113 USPQ2d 1639, 1650 (TTAB 2015); see In re Hoefflin, 97
USPQ2d 1174, 1175-76 (TTAB 2010); Krause v. Krause Publns, Inc. , 76 USPQ2d 1904, 1909-10
(TTAB 2005).
As seen from the attached official campaign website [https://berniesanders.com], Bernie Sanders is a
Senator from Vermont and a Democratic candidate for President of the United States in the 2016 election.
For this reason, he is the subject of frequent media attention and his name is often in the public view. The
use of the name BERNIE SANDERS in the proposed mark would be construed by the public as a
reference to Bernie Sanders. Because his written consent to register the mark is not of record, registration
must be refused pursuant to Section 2(c) of the Trademark Act.
The refusal under Section 2(c) will be withdrawn if applicant provides the following:
(1) A statement that the name shown in the mark identifies Bernie Sanders, a living individual
whose consent is of record; and
(2) A written consent, personally signed by the individual whose name, signature, or portrait
appears in the mark, authorizing applicant to register the identifying matter as a trademark and/or
service mark with the USPTO (e.g., I, Bernie Sanders, consent to the use and registration by
Galactic Apartments LLC of my name as a trademark and/or service mark with the USPTO).
See TMEP 813, 813.01(a), 1206.04(a).
Applicant is advised that the written consent must include a statement of the partys consent to
applicants registration, and not just the use, of the identifying matter as a trademark. See Krause v.
Krause Publns, Inc. , 76 USPQ2d 1904, 1912-13 (TTAB 2005); In re New John Nissen Mannequins, 227
USPQ 569, 571 (TTAB 1985); Reed v. Bakers Engg & Equip. Co. , 100 USPQ 196, 199 (PTO 1954);
TMEP 1206.04(a).
SPECIMEN
Registration is also refused because the specimen is merely a computerized rendering of the applied-for
mark, and thus fails to show the applied-for mark in use in commerce with the goods for each
international class. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. 1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R.
2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); In re Chica, 84 USPQ2d 1845, 1848 (TTAB 2007); TMEP 904, 904.07(a),
1301.04(g)(i). An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the
applied-for mark in use in commerce for each international class of goods identified in the application.

15 U.S.C. 1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. 2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP 904, 904.07(a).

Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, photographs that
show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, and displays associated with the actual goods at their
point of sale. See TMEP 904.03 et seq. Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they
include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to order the
goods. TMEP 904.03(i).
Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international
class:
(1) Submit a different specimen (a verified substitute specimen ) that (a) was in actual use in
commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application and (b) shows the mark in actual use
in commerce for the goods identified in the application.
(2) Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required.
This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements such as providing a
specimen.
For an overview of both response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy either option
online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/specimen.jsp.
PRIOR FILED APPLICATION
The trademark examining attorney has searched the USPTOs database of registered and pending marks
and has found no similar registered marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).
TMEP 704.02; see 15 U.S.C. 1052(d). However, a mark in a prior-filed pending application may
present a bar to registration of applicants mark.

The filing date of pending U.S. Application Serial No. 86770872 precedes applicants filing date. See
attached referenced application. If the mark in the referenced application registers, applicants mark may
be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion between
the two marks. See 15 U.S.C. 1052(d); 37 C.F.R. 2.83; TMEP 1208 et seq. Therefore, upon receipt
of applicants response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final
disposition of the earlier-filed referenced application.
In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing
the issue of the potential conflict between applicants mark and the mark in the referenced application.
Applicants election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicants right to address this
issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.

If applicant responds to the refusal(s), applicant must also respond to the requirement(s) set forth below.
Please note the mere correction of the following will NOT resolve the above-stated refusal[s].
CLASSIFICATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
The identification of goods clothing, artwork is unacceptable as indefinite and identifies goods that are
properly classified in different classes.
The wording clothing in the identification of goods must be clarified because it is too broad and could
include goods in several international classes. See TMEP 1402.01, 1402.03. Examples of acceptable

identifications include the following: clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire in
International Class 9; surgical gowns in International Class 10; pet clothing in International Class
18; and shirts, shorts, and pants in International Class 25. Therefore, applicant must amend the
identification to specify the type of clothing.
If applicants clothing is in International Class 25, applicant may amend the identification to insert the
word namely, after clothing and then list the specific types of clothing items in that class (e.g.,
shirts, pants, coats, dresses).
The wording artwork must be clarified because it is too broad and could include goods in several
international classes. See TMEP 1402.01, 1402.03. Examples of acceptable identifications include the
following: works of art of common metal in int. class 6; framed art prints in int. class 16; works
of art of clay in int. class 19. Therefore, applicant must amend the identification to specify the exact
nature of the artwork.
An applicant may only amend an identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to add to or broaden
the scope of the goods. 37 C.F.R. 2.71(a); see TMEP 1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see
the USPTOs online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual at
http://tess2.uspto.gov/netahtml/tidm.html. See TMEP 1402.04.
The application identifies goods in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all
the requirements below for each international class based on use in commerce under Section 1(a):
(1)

List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive
numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.

(2)

Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee already paid (view the
USPTOs current fee schedule at http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/tm_fee_info.jsp). The
application identifies goods that are classified in at least 2 classes; however, applicant
submitted a fee sufficient for only 1 class. Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the
classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes
covered by the fees already paid.

(3)

Submit verified dates of first use of the mark anywhere and in commerce for each
international class.

(4)

Submit a specimen for each international class. The current specimen is not acceptable for
any international class.
Examples of specimens for goods include tags, labels, instruction manuals, containers, and
photographs that show the mark on the actual goods or packaging, or displays associated with
the actual goods at their point of sale. Webpages may also be specimens for goods when they
include a picture or textual description of the goods associated with the mark and the means to
order the goods.
(5) Submit a verified statement that The specimen was in use in commerce on or in
connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application at least as early as
the filing date of the application.

See 15 U.S.C. 1051(a), 1112; 37 C.F.R. 2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(1), 2.86(a); TMEP 904, 1403.01,
1403.02(c).
For an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(a) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the
requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/multiclass.jsp.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
For this application to proceed toward registration, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or
requirement raised in this Office action. If the action includes a refusal, applicant may provide arguments
and/or evidence as to why the refusal should be withdrawn and the mark should register. Applicant may
also have other options for responding to a refusal and should consider such options carefully. To respond
to requirements and certain refusal response options, applicant should set forth in writing the required
changes or statements.
If applicant does not respond to this Office action within six months of the issue/mailing date, or responds
by expressly abandoning the application, the application process will end, the trademark will fail to
register, and the application fee will not be refunded. See 15 U.S.C. 1062(b); 37 C.F.R. 2.65(a),
2.68(a), 2.209(a); TMEP 405.04, 718.01, 718.02. Where the application has been abandoned for
failure to respond to an Office action, applicants only option would be to file a timely petition to revive
the application, which, if granted, would allow the application to return to active status. See 37 C.F.R.
2.66; TMEP 1714. There is a $100 fee for such petitions. See 37 C.F.R. 2.6, 2.66(b)(1).
ASSISTANCE
If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark
examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record;
however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not
extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. 2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP 304.01-.02,
709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation
pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney
may not provide legal advice or statements about applicants rights. See TMEP 705.02, 709.06.

/Karen K. Bush/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 108
571-272-9136
Karen.Bush@uspto.gov
TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Go to http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp. Please
wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System
(TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online
forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned
trademark examining attorney. E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office
actions; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by e-mail.
All informal e-mail communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official
application record.

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE: It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or
someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint
applicants). If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.
PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION: To ensure that applicant does
not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months
using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.uspto.gov/. Please keep
a copy of the TSDR status screen. If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the
Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call
1-800-786-9199. For more information on checking status, see
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/process/status/.
TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS: Use the TEAS form at
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

To:

Galactic Apartments LLC (info@shirtsforbernie.com)

Subject:

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 86813714 - BERNIE FUCKING

SANDERS - N/A

Sent:

12/16/2015 11:58:04 AM

Sent As:

ECOM108@USPTO.GOV

Attachments:

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION
USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED
ON 12/16/2015 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 86813714
Your trademark application has been reviewed. The trademark examining attorney assigned by the
USPTO to your application has written an official letter to which you must respond. Please follow these
steps:
(1) READ THE LETTER by clicking on this link or going to http://tsdr.uspto.gov/, entering your U.S.
application serial number, and clicking on Documents.
The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the
application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.
(2) RESPOND WITHIN 6 MONTHS (or sooner if specified in the Office action), calculated from
12/16/2015, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form located at
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.
Do NOT hit Reply to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the
USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.
(3) QUESTIONS about the contents of the Office action itself should be directed to the trademark
examining attorney who reviewed your application, identified below.
/Karen K. Bush/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 108
571-272-9136
Karen.Bush@uspto.gov

WARNING
Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the
ABANDONMENT of your application. For more information regarding abandonment, see
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.
PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION: Private
companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to
mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations. These companies often use names that closely resemble
the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document. Many solicitations
require that you pay fees.
Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you
are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation. All
official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain @uspto.gov. For more information on
how
to
handle
private
company
solicitations,
see
http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.