Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mahdi Ahmadi
Denton Resident
PhD in Philosophy (University of North Texas)
Master student in Mechanical and Energy Engineering (University of North Texas)
Denton Conundrum
2 years of studying DFW ozone problem at UNT
Statistical analysis
Photochemical simulation
Denton Conundrum
2 years of studying DFW ozone problem at UNT
Statistical analysis
Photochemical simulation
Three large sources of NOX/VOC
Results Scenario B
100% NOx reduction from the coal-fired EGUs
Change in Relative Response Factor (using the 10 highest days) and projected design value
CAMS
Ft. Worth Northwest-C13
Keller-C17
Frisco - C31
Midlothian OFW - C52
Denton Airport South - C56
Arlington - C61
Dallas North - C63
Rockwall - C69
Grapevine - C70
Kaufman - C71
Granbury - C73
Eagle Mt. Lake - C75
Parker County - C76
Cleburne Airport - C77
Midlothian Tower - C94
Dallas Hinton St. - C401
Dallas Exec. Airport - C402
Greenville - C1006
Pilot Point - C1032
2006 DV B (ppb)
89.33
91.00
87.67
77.00
93.33
83.33
85.00
77.67
90.67
74.67
83.00
93.33
87.67
85.00
80.50
81.67
85.00
75.00
81.00
UNT Projection
Scenario B
73.3
74.3
72.5
63.6
75.8
68.8
71.1
65.5
74.3
63.6
67.6
75.2
72.3
69.6
66.4
67.7
70.7
62.5
65.9
0.8120
0.8072
0.8177
0.8114
0.8029
0.8163
0.8278
0.8327
0.8111
0.8298
0.8021
0.8002
0.8180
0.7996
0.8089
0.8190
0.8223
0.8199
0.8069
72.5
73.5
71.7
62.5
74.9
68.0
70.4
64.7
73.5
62.0
66.6
74.7
71.7
68.0
65.1
66.9
69.9
61.5
65.4
Although natural gas EGUs are typically cleaner than coal-fired plant,
but in this case it is not just the matter of volume of emission, it is
also a matter of where the new source of emission is located (whose
air is getting better due to the proposed natural gas EGU?)
Do EPA BenMap analysis to see how the benefits are distributed
The location of the proposed EGU should be chosen carefully with full
consideration of the downwind effects
New air quality monitoring stations/plans are necessary to quantify
the real impacts of the proposed EGU after installation