ATENEO eJEEP

a shuttle service program that promotes

campus mobility and sustainability

Overall Claim

The Ateneo electric

jeepney has a positive
impact but still needs to
improve its inconsistent
implementation and
partial accessibility.

Criterion 1:

IMPACT
Administration
Community
Environment

Secondary Source
efficient
easier

to maintain
economical to run
(Meralco)

Administration
eases

traffic congestion
conserves the environment
provides an inclusive incampus transportation
system

Beneficiary
overall

a pleasant ride
convenient for drop-off
opts faster modes of
transportation

Criterion 1:

IMPACT
an

efficient and economical

thrust towards campus
sustainability and mobility
not the top choice

Criterion 2:

IMPLEMENTATION
Regulation
Promotion

Secondary Source
makes

a full turn-around in
20 minutes with 5-minute
intervals between trips
drop-off/pick-up at 15
seconds only
(Ateneo adopts new shuttle sytem, 2013)

Administration
inconsistent

travel schedule
drivers manually record the
passenger count and time of
arrival at each stop

Beneficiary
information

is not welldisseminated
lengthy travel time

Criterion 2:

IMPLEMENTATION
with

clear objectives and

guidelines
susceptible and inconsistent
regulation
not known to the community

Criterion 3:

ACCESSIBILITY
Availability
Accommodation

Secondary Source
supplements

the rerouting
and helps motorists with
multiple destinations on
campus (Tolentino, 2013)

Administration
rush

hours special
strategic stops
limited seating capacity

Beneficiary
hassle-free

boarding
some origins/destinations
are too distant from stops

Criterion 2:

ACCESSIBILITY
strategic

operational hours
and locations
neglects some members of
the community

Conclusion

The Ateneo electric

jeepney has a positive
impact but still needs to
improve its inconsistent
implementation and
partial accessibility.

Recommendations

less

travel time
assessment of stops
main terminal