MARYLAND:

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY

BRETT KIMBERLIN,
Plaintiff
v.

Case No. 403868V

NATIONAL BLOGGERS CLUB, ET AL.,

Defendants

DEFENDANT WALKERS SUPPLEMENT TO HIS OPPOSITION TO THE

PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STAY THIS COURTS DECISION
OF JANUARY 12, 2016 (DKT. NO. 155)
NOW COMES Defendant Aaron J. Walker, Esq., and files this Supplement to his
Opposition to the Plaintiffs Motion to Stay this Courts Decision of January 12, 2016 (Dkt. No.
155)1 and states the following:
1. On January 19, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a motion to stay this Courts January 12, 2016, granting a
dismissal and partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 155).
2. In that motion, the Plaintiff asked this Court to stay the partial summary judgment until the Court
of Special Appeals had a chance to rule on his appeal of Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., No. 380966V
(Md. Mont. Co. Cir. Ct. 2013).2 For instance, in his conclusion, the Plaintiff makes the following
request for relief: Wherefore, Plaintiff moves this Court to stay its January 12, 2016 Order [sic]
until the Court of Special Appeals rules on Kimberlin v. Walker, supra.
3. As of February 2, 2016, that request is now moot. Attached as Exhibit A is a copy of the
unreported opinion in the Court of Special Appeals affirming this Courts decision in Kimberlin
1 Mr. Walker has simultaneously filed a motion for leave to file this supplement.
2 The appeal is styled as Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., Sept. Term 2014 Nos. 1553 and 2099, Sept.
Term 2015 No. 365 (Md. App. 2016).

v. Walker, et al. in its entirety, cited solely because it is relevant under the doctrine of... res
judicata, Md. Rule 1-104(b), and not as precedent or persuasive authority. This Court can
determine it is authentic by examining the unreported opinions listed the Court of Special
Appeals website. The unreported opinions page can be found here: http://www.courts.state.md
.us/appellate/unreportedopinions/201602unreported.html. Further, the specific opinion can be
downloaded

directly

from

this

address:

http://www.courts.state.md.us/appellate/

unreportedopinions/2016/1553s14.pdf. However, the print out of the opinion is given to this

Court for its convenience.
4. Therefore, with the Court of Special Appeals having ruled in Mr. Walkers favor, the Plaintiffs
motion for a stay is now moot, providing an additional reason to deny that motion for a stay.

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff's motion to stay or reconsider this Courts January 12, 2016, order
should be denied on its merits or because it is moot, and this Court should grant any other relief
that is just and equitable.

Wednesday, February 03, 2016

Respectfully submitted,

Aaron J. Walker, Esq.

Va Bar# 48882
[redacted]
Manassas, Virginia 20109
(703) [redacted]
AaronJW72@gmail.com

VERIFICATION
I, Aaron Walker, solemnly affirm under the penalties of perjury that the contents of the
foregoing paper are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief and that all
attached exhibits are true and correct copies of the originals.

Dated:

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on the
day of
, 2016, I served copies of this
document on Brett Kimberlin at [redacted], Bethesda, Maryland 20817, via U. S. Mail and on the
following co-Defendants via email: William Hoge via Patrick Ostronic; DB Capital Strategies,
Dan Backer, Esq. via Dan Backer, Esq.; and Lee Stranahan, pro se.