Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The assignment will assist students in developing a better appreciation in ratio analysis and
interpretation as a tool for evaluating real-world companies. By reading and analysing the
annual reports of publicly-traded companies, students can acquire valuable skills such as
deciphering the various details contained in an accounting report, give informed opinions about
the companys business operations and make recommendations regarding the worthiness of
the business common shares as an investment medium.
Objectives of Project
On successful completion of this project, students will be able to demonstrate the following:
Assess the performance of a business (in terms of profitability and financial stability) by
applying financial ratio analysis.
Make appropriate business decisions with reference to various accounting information
and tools.
Tasks - Methodology
e) Together with the P/E ratio (see appendix for more information), provide justifications
on whether the companys shares are worthy of investment.
f) Submit your findings in a report with a maximum word limit of 1500 words, excluding
references and appendices. The report must be submitted in a softcopy form.
g) Note: ensure that you have at least 5 different sources of information in the appendix.
h) Note 2: Include the companys Income (or P&L) statements and Balance Sheets for the
relevant years in your reports appendix section.
i) Important: Ensure that you quote your sources and refrain from copying. I
conduct plagiarism checks on all assignments submitted. Students caught with
the said offence will face disciplinary action. Ignore this warning at your own
risk.
Submission Requirement
- A 1500-word written report (excluding cover page and references) submitted in softcopy
form to shirmen.tay@taylors.edu.my.
Assessment criteria
Assessment Criteria
Marks %
Group Component
Company Background
5%
Ratio Calculation
10%
Ratio Interpretation
10%
Investment Recommendation
5%
TOTAL
Marking criteria
Please refer to Assessment Rubric on page 3.
30%
Assessment
Criteria (with TGC)
30%
Company
Background
5%
Ratio Calculation
10%
Ratio
Interpretation
10%
Investment
Recommendations
5%
Excellent (10-9)
Good (8-7)
Satisfactory (6-5)
Poor (4-3)
Fail (2 0)
Provides a very
well-organized
and easy-tounderstand
background
history of the
firm.
Provides a
somewhat
organized and
understandable
background
history of the
firm.
Provides a
disorganized and
somewhat hardto-understand
background
history of the
firm.
Background
history of the firm
is presented in a
very disorganized
and difficult-tocomprehend
manner.
All the
calculations
performed are
correct with
reference to the
formulas and
accounting report
data.
There are 7 or
more calculation
mistakes in terms
of misapplication
of formula or
using the wrong
data.
The student
demonstrated
excellent
understanding of
the ratios i.e.
interpreted all the
calculation results
correctly.
The student
demonstrated
good
understanding of
the ratios i.e.
interpreted most
of the calculation
results correctly.
The student
demonstrated
adequate
understanding of
the ratios i.e.
interpreted at
least half of
calculation results
correctly.
The student
demonstrated
poor
understanding of
the ratios and
interpreted a
majority of the
calculation results
incorrectly..
The student
demonstrated
very poor
understanding of
the ratios and
interpreted almost
all of the
calculation results
incorrectly.
The student
provided her
investment
recommendations
based on
excellent
justifications.
The student
provided her
investment
recommendations
based on good
justifications.
The student
provided her
investment
recommendations
based on
mediocre
justifications.
The student
provided her
investment
recommendations
based on poor
justifications.
The student
provided her
investment
recommendations
based on very
poor justifications.