Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Concrete
producers
are
constantly
faced
with
changing
technology.
Computer
control
are
but
few
of
the
current
technologies
in
the
ever-evolving
concreteproduction industry. At least some things never change: take storage silos, for example.
Thesevertical tanks are about as simple as it gets, right? Dead wrong and dead may prove
thecritical term if a concrete producer or his plant engineer is careless in the design or use of a silo.
It may surprise some that storage silos are not just tanks but, in fact, structures that havefunction
criteria including how the silo is to fill, empty, and store a given bulk product; flowpattern, i.e., mass or
funnel flow; structural geometry comprising the shape and materialsincorporated in silo design; and
how these are affected in full or empty operations and undervaried ambient conditions.
Understanding the material to be stored
A common mistake on the part of concrete plant owners arises from the assumption that acement silo
design can be used for storing any bulk product around the concrete plant. Thefact, however, is that
cement storage design criteria are distinct; it is not safe to assume thatslag, fly ash, silica fume or silica
sand, lime, or other bulk fines can be contained in a silooriginally designed for cement storage.
Producers need to understand the characteristics,properties and flow patterns of any material to be
stored in a silo.
To determine a material property and flow pattern, contacting the material supplier andasking for
complete product data worksheets is recommended. Such measures have becomeincreasingly
important as replacement ingredients in bulk are being added with far greaterfrequency to concrete and
concrete products. Self Compacting Concrete (SCC) and HighPerformance Concrete (HPC), often
calling for various bulk powder or fines additives, arefrequently purchased without consideration of their
respective silo storage requirements. Forinstance, cement is aerated to make it flowable or fluid-like.
Although weighing in some casesas little as 60 percent of certain cements (by volume), fly ash can be
handled much like cement,as the latter has higher design criteria but not always (Figure 1).
Design criteria
Consider, for example, a conical or round silo constructed of steel containing a product that
has a lower friction coefficient (wall friction angle) than a referenced designer's cement on
steel. Assume a producer selects a product, such as fly ash (60-74 lb. per cu. ft.), and placesthe
product in a storage silo without consulting the silo designer. Because the material islighter than the
cement product (85-94 lb. per cu. ft.), the producer presumably feels safe indoing so. A problem,
however, arises in that the cement silo was designed to accommodate theproperties of normal weight
cement. The silo designer, assuming a mass flow discharge of afluidized product that may typify fly ash
as well, was also taking into account a wall frictionangle creating a structural vertical transfer of weight
to the cylinder wall of the silo. With itsround surface area compared to the coarse surface area of
cement, the lighter fly ash has alower friction angle; consequently, a greater amount of the silo product
weight is now creatingpressure on the silo hopper or bottom cone section far greater than specified
in the originaldesign. A complete hopper or cone section failure could result. Should the friction angle
begreater, higher compressive loads will be transferred to the cylinder wall, which might causebuckling
or the silo's collapse (Figure 2).
Thus, informed producers recognizes that avoiding errors in silo use contributes to a saferenvironment
and workplace. Silo failure can be catastrophic to workers and their businesses.Contacting your silo
designer before placing any product in the vessel is always advisable.
Multi-compartment silos
Whenever a conical silo is split into separate compartments, careful design calculations arerequired.
Various design pitfalls must be avoided that can lead to asymmetric pressuresimposed on internal
components, given certain product, ambient and load conditions (wind,rain, snowfall, and seismic).
These pressures can cause uneven emptying and further loadingor pressure peaks. The silo designer
must be knowledgeable regarding inserts involved in aproperly constructed split or multi-sectional
storage silo and their effect in relation to pressurepeaks resulting from erratic flow properties. Stiffening
supports and multiple openings in silohoppers or cone bottoms must be incorporated as needed.
Other considerations are the structural ramifications of a multi-compartment silo, which maybe full on
one side and completely or partially empty on the other(s) under high wind loads orin severe weather
conditions, such as tornado (vacuum conditions) or hurricane (severe upliftand external wind-load
pressures). Even in the absence of pressure peaks due to externaladverse factors, nonuniform
pressures created by eccentric withdraw from multi-compartmentsilos can cause total structural failure.
Designing a multi-compartment silo by splitting asimple, single-compartment storage tank is a recipe
for potential disaster.
The same design criteria apply even more stringently to rectangular or square silos. Placing amassflow product like cement or fly ash into a bin-style silo that may have been designed forfunnel-flow
material properties imagine how sand is drawn down can create an
underdesign situation. If mass flow develops, the pressure may be much greater than designcriteria
would accommodate in a funnel flow bin. Consequences could include silo collapse.While the reverse
situation may occur, the ramifications are not as great. Clearly, if yourstorage bin or silo is designed as
a rectangular structure for bulk powders, it must be fit for thestorage and discharge of mass-flow
products (if that is what you plan to store) and not funnel-flow products.
Temperature considerations
Observing that the belts are not running upon viewing a plant, a concrete producer mayassume the
plant is idle. Yet, the plant is always in motion, especially where storage silos areconcerned. Silos are
like huge sails when subjected to wind loads; they deflect, sway, and evenrotate. However, the silo
moves differently depending on how full or how empty it is at agiven time. Think of the silo's movement
relative to its contents as comparable to the positionof the sail to the wind the effect is that great.
The variables are seemingly inexhaustible, butcertainly, load combinations for wind and uplift in silos
that are full, partially full, and emptyare important design criteria. Empty silos, for example, are not
necessarily creating lower loads.
Picture a cool evening about ten o'clock on a Saturday. A fully exposed silo (any shape) hasbeen
standing in the sun all day long. Now, consider that the plant is idle, and the silo is nearlyfull, having
been partially filled last at two o'clock on the previous afternoon. Suddenly, ahuge implosion occurs;
cement (or any given powder) rains down on everything. Fortunately,all plant personnel had left the
yard for the weekend.
What could have happened? The scenario described here actually occurred and was caused by
something silo design engineers refer to as thermal ratcheting (Figure 3, page 24).
During daylight hours as the ambient temperature rises, the silo enlarges mostly incircumference. The
degree of expansion is determined by the specified hoop strength,i.e.,tensile wall strength, and/or by
incidental geometries, that is, the shape of the silo and theexistence of rigid areas in the structure. The
stored material at rest is allowed to settle as thewall expands. When night comes and the temperature
drops, the silo wall contracts. The nearfull silo cannot push the material back up the silo wall without a
substantial increase in tensilestresses. This thermal ratcheting effect is compounded for every day the
temperature rises, asthe sun warms the silo, followed by a cool night when a near-full silo sits idle. For
this reason,bolted construction silos are often welded on the interior after assembly, and rivets and
boltsmust meet exacting specifications. Clearly, in the case of a silo of bolted-construction design,the
entire structure is only as good as the fasteners used and the personnel who areresponsible for
tightening them.
Scribd
Upload a Document
Search Documents
Explore
Sign Up
|
Log In
/ 26
There are two primary and distinct types of flow of solids in hoppers, mass flow and
funnel flow.There is also a special case that is a combination of these two flows called
expanded flow.These flows get their names from the way in which solids move in the
hoppers.The characteristics and differences between the flows are depicted in Figure 101.
The primary difference between mass and funnel flow is that in mass flow all of thematerial in the bin is
in motion, though not necessarily all with the same velocity.Infunnel flow only a core of material in the
center above the hopper outlet is in motionwhile material next to the walls is stationary (stagnant).
Hoppers come in a variety of shapes and designs, not just conical.Figure 10-2 shows
some of the more common designs found for mass flow hoppers.Also, a variety of
designs are possible for funnel flow hoppers, shown in Figure 10-3.
* Other references that give a good summary on this topic include:
1.J. Bridgwater and A.M. Scott, Flow of Solids in Bunkers, in Handbook of
Fluids in Motion, N.P. Cheremisinoff and R. Gupta eds., Butterworth, Ann Arbor,
chapter 31, 807-846, 1983.
2.R. Holdich, Fundamentals of Particle Technology, Midland, Loughborough, UK,
2002.
3.M. Rhodes, Principles of Powder Technology, Wiley, New York, 1990.
10-1
Dp
L
p
(E) WEDGE
(F) PYRAMID
(A) CONICAL HOPPER
Da
(B) SQUARE OPENING
(C) CHISEL
Figure 10-2.Common designs for mass flow hoppers.
10-2
FLOW IS TOO SLOW.The material does not exit from the hopper fast
enough to feed follow on processes.
long period of time the particles tend to rearrange themselves so that they become
more tightly packed together.This effect is referred to as Dense Packing by Foust in
the bed porosity in Figure 4-5.The consolidated materials are more difficult to flow
and tend to bridge or rat hole.
FUNNEL FLOW
ADVANTAGES
Rat holing
Segregation
First-in = Last-out
Mineral Bridges
Chemical reactions
Partial melting
Binder hardening
PreviousNext
1.
p.
p.
p.
2.
p.
p.
p.
3.
p.
p.
p.
4.
p.
p.
p.
5.
p.
p.
p.
6.
p.
p.
p.
7.
p.
p.
p.
8.
p.
p.
p.
9.
p.
p.
p.
10.
p.
p.
p.
11.
p.
p.
p.
12.
p.
p.
p.
13.
p.
p.
p.
14.
p.
p.
p.
15.
p.
p.
p.
16.
p.
p.
PreviousNext
1.
30 p.
26 p.
10 p.
2.
31 p.
12 p.
27 p.
3.
31 p.
38 p.
23 p.
4.
23 p.
25 p.
29 p.
5.
36 p.
36 p.
19 p.
6.
20 p.
20 p.
24 p.
7.
15 p.
17 p.
26 p.
8.
10 p.
31 p.
12 p.
9.
27 p.
Recent Readcasters
Add a Comment
Upload a Document
Search Documents
Follow Us!
scribd.com/scribd
twitter.com/scribd
facebook.com/scribd
About
Press
Blog
Partners
Scribd 101
Web Stuff
Scribd Store
Support
FAQ
Developers / API
Jobs
Terms
Copyright
Privacy