" "

.
1437

2015


"

"

19 :

"

" (

) - -

. .
2015 / / :

. . .
/ :

2015 /

"

" ( )

.
:

2015 /

( )

"

"

.
" "

"
"
"

"

" "

" "
.

3-1

37-4

10

12

13

18

21

38

83-39

61-39

83-62

: (

132-84

108-84

132-109

212-133

163-133
212-164

216 -213

238-217

1
2

.

.

15
16

16

17

133

134

135

135

136

10

137

11

139

12

140

13

141

14

142

15

144

16

145

17
18

146

148

19

149

20

154

21

156

22

157

23

158

24

159

25

160

26

163

27

164

28
29

165
166

30

167

31

168

32

169


33
34
35
36
37

.
.

.
.

.

170
170
171
172
174

38
39

177

40

178

41

175

180

42

181

43

183

44

184

46

48

45

47

49

50

52

54

51

53

55

185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
195
196

56

58

57

59
60

.
.

61
62

.

.

63

64

197
198
200
201
202
203
204
205
206

65

208

66

209


,


,


, ,


.

,
( )381 ,
:
-1 ,
( )%94.7
(.)%5.3
-2
( )

 () ()
.
-3 , ( )%97.5
(.)%2.5
-4 ( )%93.1
.
-5
, (.)%63.9
-6 ,


.

.






(
).

.




.
( )
: :
:
.
( "
" )
( )

.

:
:

.

:




(.)1





.

( )2

- 1 : 2 1999
.70-69
- 2 :
2009. 452

( )1



.


( )2

:

:
-1
-2

1 - Denis McQuail, McQuails Mass Communication Theory, 6th edition, London,

SAGE Publication, 2010, p117.
- 2 :
2013 1.59
: 2011 .66 :
:
2014 34. 206

-3
-4
-5
-6 (
)
-7

-8 (
)
-9

:

( ) :
-1 (
).
-2
" ".
-3
( ).

-4
( ).
-5
" ".
-6
.
-7
.
-8
.
-9
.
-11
.
-11 (
) .
-12
(
).

:

( )1


:
-1 : :
- ()%32.5
( )2

.

-
.
-2 : :
-
.

- 1 2
2000. 28
- 2 .
http://cosit.gov.iq/ar/component/content/article/58-arabic- 2015 / 9 /12
cat/2013-02-21-09-00-50/452-studies-28

-
.

-
.

:
:
-1 .
-2 .
-3 .
-4 .
-5 .
-6
.
-7 (
) .
-8 .

10

:



(.)1


( )2


.

: :

-1 :


( )3
- 1 2011 .96
- 2
2012 .37
- 3 .206

11

( )41
( )%11.5 ( )21 ( )21

:
- .
- .
- .
- .

-2 :
(Statically package for
) the social science ) (SPSS




:
-1 .
-2 .
-3 ()Cronbachs alpha

12

-4 (.)split half
-5 (.)Spearman-Brown
-6 .
-7 (.)Chi square
-8 (.)Independent Samples T Test
-9 ( .)paired Samples T Test
:
:
-1 :
:
-
.
-

.
-

.

13

-

.
-2 :
:
-
( )29 -15

()1

( )16
.
-
.
-
.

-3 :

2115-2-15 .2115/5/1

- 1 :
7 1
2014. 39
: 2009. 22

14

: :

()48610
( )

()1

()

( )( )2 ( )381

( ) (.)2
- 1
2013 .116

N p1 p
N 1 d2 z2 p1 p

:
:N
:Z ( )0.95 ()1.96
:d ()0.05
:P ()0.50
])n = 48610 * 0.50 (1 0.50) / [48610 1 * {(0.05)2 / (1.96)2] + 0.50 (1 0.50
]= 48610 * 0.50 * 0.50 / [48609 * (0.0025 / 3.841)] + 0.50 * 0.50
]= 48610 *0.25 / [48609 * 0.00065] + 0.25
=12152.5 / 31.59 + 0.25
=12152.5 / 31.84
=381.67
n=381
- 2
16 2015 2.474

M
n 2
S M 1 pq 1
:
:M
: S ( )0.95 0.05 1.96
: P ()0.50
: q ()0.50
n = 48610 / [(0.05 / 1.96)2 * (48610 1) / 0.50 * 0.50] +1
= 48610 / [0.00065 * 48609 / 0.25] +1
= 48610 / 127.3 , n = 381.

15

( )
:


( )15744 ( )%32
( )123 ( ) ()8119
( )%51 ( ) 63 ( )
( )7735 ( )%49 ( )61
( ) 32866 ( )%68( )258 (
) ( )20150 ( )%61 ( )158
( ) ( )12716 ( )%39()111
. ( )1()2
( )1
.

15744

32866

48610

%32

%68

%111

123

258

381

16

( )2
.

8009

%51

63

20150

%61

158

7735

%49

61

12716

%39

111

15744

%111

123

32866

%100

258

( )
( )

( )3(.)4

17

( )3 .

31

31

32

14

31

123

( )4 .

79

79

51

51

258

18

:
-1 :


( )1

( )

( )94.75 (.)

- 1 3
2006. 156
( ) ( ) .
-1. . .
-2. . .
-3.. . .
-4.. . .
-5.. . .
-6.. . .
-7.. . .
-8.. . .
-9.. . .
( ) :

= 100

235
= 94.75 = 100
248

19

-2 :

( ) ( ) :

- :

()381
: :
( )1.82
()

( )1.91 .

( " )"Cronbachs alpha :

) (Cronbachs alpha

( )1
( )381

( ) ( ) = + +1 / ( : )
= 0.82 + 1 / 0.82 + 0.82
= 1.82 / 1.64
= 0.90
- 1
2009 .80

20
()

() ()1.93

.
:





.

:
:
-1

()1

( ) ) (Cronbachs alpha (.)spss
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's

- 1 .

N of Items

Alpha

59

.931

21

( )
( )471
:
-

( )%95
( )%42.6 ( )6-4 .

- ( )%85
.
-
( )%61 .
-
.
-
: .

-2

22
((1

( )512 ( )256
:
-

.
-
.
-
.
- .
- 1
.2014

23

-3 (:(1







( )111 ( )51 ( )25
:
- ()
.
- ()

.
- ( )%81(
)% 72

- 1 :

/ 3 .2015

24

() ()
.
-

.
-
( )%34
( )%33
( ) %29
.
:
:
-1

()1

""Facebook
" "Twitter " "

- 1 /
2014
.2015

25

" "Facebook " "Twitter :
- (-
) ( ).
- ( _)
( _)
.
- ( _)
( _) .

:
-1

()1

- 1 :
3 .2006 1

26

( )285
:
-

(. )%5.37

- ( )%5.3
( )%21
.
-
( )%6.31 (. )%7.32
-
.
-
( )%44 (. )%7.14
-2

()1

- 1 :
.2009 33

27

:
-

-3

(:)1

( F42 ) BBC



- 1 :
( 24 )2012
.2012 3

28

( F24 ) BBC
:
-

- ( )

( )F24 ) )BBC .
- ) (BBC) (F24

(. )%28
- ( )

.
-4

(:)1

- 1
.2012

29

:
-

-
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
-5

(:)1

- 1 :

2 .2014 7

30

( )411
:
-

(.)%69

- .

-
.
- ( )%91
.
-
.

-6

(:)1

- 1 .

31

( )511 :
-

( )%79.42
.

( )%34.73
( )%8.63
.

( )%91.49
( )%83.41 (.)%45.35

( )
.

(:)1
-7

- 1 ()
:
..
.2015

32

( )737
:
-
.
-
.

-
.
- ( )%44
.
- ( )%33
.
- ( )%23
.

33

:
-1 (:)1() Stefanone, et al




( )456 :
-
.
-
.
-
.
- ()32
( )6
.

1 - Michael A. Stefanone et al , The Relationship between Traditional Mass Media and Social
& Media:Reality Television as a Model for Social Network Site Behavior, Journal of Broadcasting
Electronic Media, vol.54, no.3 , 2010.

34

-
( )47.
-2 (:)1() Chao Chen





()
( 31 31 )2111
:
- ( )339
.
- ( )
( )147
( ).
- ( )65 ( )47
( )PTT ( )17 ().
1 - Lin Chao Chen, Convergence of new and old media: new media representation in
traditional news, Chinese Journal of Communication, Vol.6 , No.2 , 2013.

35

- ( ) ( )71
( )Liberty Times ( )68
( )25 .
-
().

-1
.
-2
( ).
-3

.
-4



.

36

-5


.
-6
.

:
:
-1

.
-2


.
-3
.

37

-4

.
-5
.

: :
-1 :
( " "
).
-2 :

( )2115 -2114 .
-3 :
( :
).

39

:



.
-1 :
(( )PC Magazine encyclopedia( :

()1

-


.
-


.
((:


( )

.
1- new media .in PC Magazine encyclopedia.
http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/47936/new-media 2015/1/9

40

))(.)1
( )Webopedia (( :



))(.)2
- : ()Sheridan
(( :

))(.)3
(( :

))(.)4

- 1 :
2014 .47
( )
.
2 - New media. In Webopedia. 2015/1/9
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/N/new_media.html
- 3 2013 .63
4 -Steve jones, Encyclopedia of new media: an Essential Reference to communication
and technology , sage publication ,2002.

41

((:

:
))(.)1
- :
(( :

()
))(.)2
((: " "
" "

: ))(.)3
(( : ()

:
207 2.171
1 - Robert k. Logan, understanding new media: extending Marshall McLuhan, new
York, die deutsche national bibliothek , 2010, p4.
- 2 :
15-13 2011.5
- 3 ( )
2014.53

42

()
))(.)1
(( :
()
))(.)2




: .
(:)3
-1
.
-2
.
- 1
2008 190.8
- 2 .

10-7 2013.4
- 3
2013 .47

43

-3 .
-4
.
-5 .
-6
.







.

44

:
-1 (( : :

))(.)1
-2 (( :


))(.)2
-3 (( :

))(.)3
-4 (( :



))(.)4

- 1 .54
- 2 2010 .7
- 3 2015 .10
- 4 2007 .141

45

-5 ((:


))(.)1
-6 ((:

))(.)2
-7 ((:

))(.)3
-8 (( :


))(.(4



- 1
2011.57
- 2
.169
- 3 2015 .37
- 4 .187

46

.





(.)1




:
-1 :

- 1 2012 .11

47

( )1



(.)2
-2 :



( )

- 1 26 2010 2-1
.444
- 2 :
2011 .14-13

48

-3

()1

( )2


()3

:


.

- 1
2013 93.27
- 2 2013
.147
- 3 :
2007 62.10

 :
-4

49

:



(.)1

( )Richard davis ( )Diana Owen
( ) :
-1 : :


:
) )TV/Radio Talk ( )Talk Show
) )magazine TV news ) (Live Show

- 1 .148

50

:
(.)1
-2 : :





(.)2
-3 : :

- 1 :
20008 .39
-2
.69-68

51

(.)1

(:)2
-1
.
-2 .
-3 :
: .
-4
: .

-1
.7
- 2 :
: .61
2013 20.53
2015 . 20
- .71-70

52

.


:
-1 :





(.)1
-2 :


(.)2

- 1
2009 .28-27
- 2 2011 .21

53

-3 :

()1

-4 : ()



(.)2
-5 :





(.)3

- 1 .56
- 2 2014 .165
- 3 ( ) 2012 - 140
.141

 :
-6

54

:



(.)1

-7

:



(
) (.)2

-8 :


(.)3

- 1 .92-91
- 2
2014 . 241
- 3 2011
.91

55

.
(



)

((1

- 1 8
2009. 32

56

(.)1





(.)2

:

()3

-1
.
-2
.
-3
.

- 1 :
2010 .22
- 2 :
2010 2.48
- 3 .43-42

57

-4
.

()1

( )2

"
"

(.)3

- 1 .45-44
- 2
2015.183
- 3 :
2014 .13

58

()1


(.)2





( )3


( )4

- 1 .27
- 2 2014 .66-62
- 3 2007 .70
- 4
2012.91

59

( )1
(:)2
-1
.
-2

.
:

()3

( )4


- 1
2010 25.34
- 2 2013 .23
- 3 .24
- 4 2011
.223

60

(.)1


(:)2
:

-1

:
(.)Links
-2

.






- 1 2011
.68-67
- 2 " "
2008 .137-136

61

:
(.)1

- 1
2013.67

62

:

:







:
-1 :
(( )PC Magazine encyclopedia(((:




))(.)1
( )

.
1 -Social Networking Site in Encyclopedia PC Magazine. 2015/2/25

63

(( )ODLIS((( :



))(.)1
( )webopedia (( :




))(.)2
-2 :
((:

http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/55316/social-networking-site
( (
) ) University Connecticut Western .
- 1
2013 .49
()
.

2 - Social networking site in webopedia.

2015/2/25
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/social_networking_site.html

64

))(.)1
(( :


))(.)2
(( :

))(.)3
-3 :
( :


))(.)4

1- Eleanor T. Loiacono, Self-Disclosure Behavior on Social Networking Web Sites,

International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2015, p66.
2 - Paul M. Leonardi et al , Enterprise Social Media: Definition, History, and Prospects
for the Study of Social Technologies in Organizations , Journal of Computer-Mediated
Communication, vol.19, no.1, 2013, p2.
3 - Barbara K. Kaye, Between Barack and a Net Place: Motivations for Using Social
Network Sites and Blogs for Political Information, Edited: Zizi Papacharissi, A
Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites, New York,
Routledge, 2011, p 210.
- 4 .207

65

( :

))(.)1
(( :

))(.)2

2
( )





.

- 1
:
2013.330
- 2 2011
.163

66

""john A. Barnes
1954

( )1 1989
( world wide

)web (.)2
1994
( (geocities theglobe.com

(.)3
1995
) )classmates.com
( )4 1997 ) (sixdigrees.com

- 1
72014 2
.225
- 2 2012
.240
- 3
2012 395.155
- 4 :
2013. 104

67

(.)1
1999
2001 ( )2 2002
( )Friendster
2002 ) (google
2002 ))sky rock

(.)3
2003 ( )Myspace
()Friendster
( )Friendster
) (Friendster
( )Myspace

- 1
2013 .135
- 2 2012 .38
- 3 :
2012.114

68

( )Myspace
( )Friendster
(.)1((Friendster
( )Myspace

2004 ( )


( )2 2006



( )profile
(.)3

1 - Danah m.boyd and Nicole B.Ellison , social network sites: definition history and
scholarship, journal of computer-mediated communication ,vol.13,no.1, 2007, pp.216217 .
- 2
2011.205
- 3 :facebook
( )
2012 .62

69

( )1

()1

1 - Danah m.boyd and Nicole B.Ellison , op.cit, p212.

70

2005 (
)

(.)1
2006 (
)
() ( )140

(.)2

( )Instagram 2010


( ) 2012 ()
( )( )3 ( )
- 1
: 2009 - 520
.521
2 - Bellarmine A. Ezumah, College Students Use of Social Media: Site Preferences,
Uses and Gratifications Theory Revisited, International Journal of Business and Social
Science, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2013, p.29.
3 - Danielle Salomon, Moving on from Facebook Using Instagram to connect with
undergraduates and engage in teaching and learning, College & Research Libraries
News vol. 74, no. 8, 2013, p408.

71

( )(.)1
2011 ( )google plus
( )chime.in
( )2


.


:
-1 :



:

- 1 2015/8/7
https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A5%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%BA%D8%
B1%D8%A7%D9%85
- 2 .46

72

(.)1
-2 :



(.)2
-3 :

(.)3
-4 :

(.)4
-5 :

- 1
2014 .98-97
- 2 .158
- 3
29 2013 57.8
- 4 . 8

73

(.)1
-6 :
:
(.)2

:
-1 :
:





(.)3

- 1 .27
- 2 .50
- 3 .211

 :
-2

74

:



( )tributes


: (.)1

-3

:
:
: ( ) library thing

(.)2

-4

:


( )3

- 1
2010 8.11
- 2 2011.51
- 3
2012 2.191

75

( ) LinkedIn
( )150
( )200

(.)1

:
-1

/ :

:

- 1
2012 39.66

76

(.)1
-2

/ :



"" (.)2

-3

:
(.)3

-4

:


(.)4

-5

:
( ) groups

- 1 .211
- 2 :
2013.174
- 3
7 2014 2.288
- 4 .60

77

( )events
(.)1
-6

:





(.)2

- 1

" " 7- 5
2009. 13
- 2 .166

78

-1 :

(.)1
-2 :


(.)2
-3

:

()3

: ()LinkedIn

- 1 2014 .77
- 2 .62
- 3 .51

79

( )%63 (.)1
-4

:


()2

(.)3()Imedix
-5

:



(.)4

-6

:


) ) group

- 1
: 262012 6
.1397
- 2 .37
- 3 :
2014 .176
- 4 .1395

80

( )
()1
:



(.)2
-7

:


(.)3

:
-1 :


- 1
( )2013
.460
- 2
2013. 346
- 3 .71

81

(.)1
-2 :



:
(.)2
-3 :





(.)3
-4 :

- 1 .227
- 2 11
2014.214
- 3 2011
.93

82

(.)1
-5 :







(.)2

-6 :

( )3

- 1 :

2013. 11
- 2
2014 .86-85
- 3 2014 .121

83

( )1







.

-1

2014 .76-75
2015/3/5
/http://repository.nauss.edu.sa/bitstream/handle/123456789/5524320%%
2020%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%
pdf?sequence=2.

 : ( )

:


( )Sender
( )Message ( )Channel
()1()Feed Back
( )Receiver

(.)2
((:


))(.)3
((
))(.)4

- 1 2011 .54
- 2 .142
- 3 2010 .130
- 4 : 1998
.37

84

85

: ( )

(( )1





)(.)2
(

: )( )3

(.)4

- 1 .42
- 2 2 1978 .349
- 3 3 2010
.93
- 4 2 1997 .288

 : ( )

((


))( )1

(.)2

(.)3





- 1 : 13
1984. 85
- 2
1975 8 .4 -3
- 3 1985 .31

86

 : ( )

(.)1

()2

(.(3

( 15 )25

- 1 .91-90
- 2
2010 3. 100
- 3
2011 27 -26. 330

87

 : ( )

( )1
( 15 24)(.)2
( 16 25)
( )3



(.)4

- 1
2012 398
.64
- 2 :
:2017 -2014 2014 .9
. 2015/8/17/http://www.unesco.org/new/ar/social-and-human-sciences/themes/youth
2 2012. 78
2011 .11
- 3 1993
.405 : .325
- 4
2010 4.95

88

 : ( )

( )1



(.)2

(( : ))(.)3
(( :


))(.)4

- 1 .100
- 2 - 2006 .255-254
- 3 .42
- 4 2004 .150-149

89

 : ( )

(( :
))(.)1
(( : ))(.)2
:
(.)3






(.)4

- 1 .102
- 2 2003
.36
- 3 - - .275
- 4 .102

90

 : ( )

(.)1
((
))( )2

(.)3

( )4
: ( )5
( )6

- 1 2 1993
.174
- 2
2010 .108
- 3 .42
- 4 2011 .88
- 5 5
2010. 168
- 6 . . : 2010
.263

91

 : ( )

(.)1


( )2
( )3
( )4



(.)5

:

- 1 : 2007 1816
http://www.ahewar.org/debat/show.art.asp?aid=87696 2015/3/19 :
- 2
4 1985 2.56
- 3 . :
2008 .20
- 4 : 1985
.120
- 5 2005 .29

92

 : ( )

( )1






(.)2

(.)3


- 1 :
2011 14.126
- 2 .226
- 3
2011 .85-84

93

 : ( )

( )1



(:)2
-1 .
-2 .
-3 .
-4 (.)3


( )4

- 1 .2
- 2 .31
- 3 .119
- 4 .328

94

 : ( )

(.)1

(.)2

()3

.
- 1
: " "
2012 .3
- 2 .137
- 3 .100-99

95

 : ( )

-1 .






()1


(.)2





( )3



- 1 2012 .161
- 2
2010 .144
- 3 :
2015 .335

96

 : ( )

(.)1






()2

(.)3

- 1 :
2012.219
- 2 .51-50
- 3
2011 3.5

97

 : ( )

( )1

(.)2




( )%15



(.)3

- 1 2014 11949.9
http://www.alarab.co.uk/?id=11949 2014/3/12 :
- 2 :
.2014 16235
http://albayaniq.com/?p=16235 2015/3/7 :
- 3 .75

98

 : ( )

()1

-
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
-

:
.

- 1
.62-59

99

 : ( )

(.)1

:
(.)2



:

- 1 2006 .26
2 - Jiong Xu, Analysis of Competition between Radio & TV and Network Media,
International Conference on Education Technology and Economic Management
(ICETEM), Beijing, China, Published by Atlantis Press, 2015, pp404-405.

100

 : ( )

(.)1



( )2






(.)3

- 1 :
2008 2 . 93-92
- 2
2013 .104-103
- 3 .188

101

 : ( )

( )BBC


(.)1

( -)





- ()
( )
(.)2

- 1 .166
- 2 :
2011 3.30

102

 : ( )

-2 :




( )1





(.)2





- 1 :
2012 15.53
- 2 :
2013.40

103

 : ( )

()1

-1

.
-2


.
-3



.

- 1 : 2009 . 13-11

104

 : ( )

( )1



( )2 2011

( )3
(.)4

- 1 .100-99
- 2 .112
- 3
2012 .159
- 4 :
.4

105

 : ( )

:
( )1

(.)2



( )3



(.)4


: :

- 1 2008
.79
- 2 :
36 2012 .68
- 3 :
2010 .184
- 4 :
2011 3.23

106

 : ( )

( )1

( )%49.2
( )2
( )%58
(.)3




(.)4

- 1
2014. 74
- 2 :
2005.96
- 3 .80
4 - Stephen D.Reese and Jla Dal (2009): the role of citizen journalism in china's
changing media and social Enveronment.
: .53

107

 : ( )

(.)1



( )2




(.)3

- 1 .11
- 2 .81
- 3 : .48-47

108

 : ( )

( )1 ( )2

()3


(.)4

( )5


- 1 2008 .86
- 2 2003
.2526
3 -Leekyung Kim , Facebook use among students in Sweden :Based on uses and
gratifications theory and Stephensons the play theory of mass communication, Master
Thesis, Media and Communication Studies School of Social and Health Sciences ,
Halmstad University, 2011, p15.
- 4 6 2009
.203
5 - Abd El-Basit Ahmed Hashem ,Uses and gratifications of online advertising a
comparative study between Germany and Egypt, Thesis Doctor, Mass communications
technical university of Ilmenau, 2010,p12.

109

 : ( )

(.)1



( )2
:


(.)3



.

- 1 2012 .169
- 2 2007
.66-65
3 -Leila Karimi et al, Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory to Compare Higher
Education Students Motivation for Using Social Networking Sites: Experiences from
Iran, Malaysia, United Kingdom, and South Africa, Journal of Contemporary
Educational Technology, vol. 5, no.1, 2014, p55.

110

 : ( )

(.)1
1944 ( )
" "

:

(.)2
1945



(.)3

- 1 . - 3 :
1999 .266
- 2 3 2004.272
3 - C. Bernard ,p .lazarsfeld and W. mephee, voting :a study of opinion fornication in a
presidential campaign, Chicago university of Chicago press, 1954,p263.

111

 : ( )

( )wolf and fiske 1949

1959 ( )katz


( )1

(.)2
" "
( )Elihu katz ( )Blumler 1974
()3

( )Stanford, Zillman, Bryant, Riccomini

(.)4

: .173
- 1
2012 .319
- 2 2002 .77-76
- 3 2010
.153
- 4 .69

112

 : ( )

( )1
(.)2


:
-1








(.)3

- 1
2008. 121
- 2 : 2003 .30
- 3 2006
.232

113

 : ( )

-2







(.(1
-3

- 1
2009 .273

114

 : ( )

(.)1
))2

:
-1

.
-2




.

- 1 :

2010 .75-74
- 2
2014 .40-39

115

 : ( )

:
-1 1959-1944 :





( )1

(.(2

- 1 .234
- 2 .285

116

 : ( )

-2 1974 :
()


( )1



( )2


(.)3
-3 1979 :

- 1 .41
- 2 2000
.209
- 3 .337-366

117

 : ( )

( )1


(.)2
-4 1988 :





( )3

(.)4


(:)5

- 1 .76
- 2 .241
- 3 .270
- 4 .326
-5 :

118

119

: ( )

-1
.
-2
.
-3

.
-4
.
-5
.

Stanley J. Baran and Dennis K. Davis, Mass Communication Theory:

Foundations, Ferment, and Future, sixth edition, Boston, Wadsworth cengage
learning, 2010, pp253-254.
.241 2010.299 2013 .71
: - - 2011.146
2011 .65 2014 .179-178

 : ( )

()1

-1
.
-2
.
-3 .

:
-1 :

- 1 :
2003 .255
2009 .158 .282 - .241

120

 : ( )

( )1


( )2
(.)3
-2

()4


(.)5



(.)6

1 - Jay G. Blumler ,The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies, Journal of
communication research, vol.6 , no.1, 1979,p13.
- 2 .160
- 3 .156
- 4 .193
5 - Abd El-Basit Ahmed Hashem, op.cit, pp18-19.
- 6 .184-183

121

 : ( )

-3 :





(.)1
-4

()2

(.)3
-5

( )4
- 1 .78
- 2 .76
- 3 .256-255
- 4 .214

122

 : ( )

(.)1
-6 :

( )2


(.)3



:

1 - Elizabeth M. Perse, and alan m. Roubin, Chronic Loneliness and Television Use ,
Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, vol.34 no.1, Winter 1995,p37.
:
.266
- 2 .24
- 3 2010 . 113

123

 : ( )

-1

(.)1
-2



(.)2
-3

(.(3
-4

(.)4
-5 :

(.)1
- 1
.196
- 2 . - .267-266
- 3 .291
- 4 .118

124

 : ( )

-6

(.)2
-7
(.)3
-8
(.)4
-9
(.(5
-10

(.)6

- 1 .257
- 2
2011 .258
- 3 2013.66
- 4 .86
- 5 .205
6 - Lisa Jane Orchard, personality as a predictor of facebook engagement, thesis of
doctor, University of Wolver Hampton, 2013, p31.

125

 : ( )

(.)1



()2

(.)3

- 1
: 2009
.269
2 - Thomas E. Ruggiero , Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century, Journal
of mass communication and society ,vol.3 , no.1 , 2000, pp28-29.
3 - Robert LaRose and Matthew S. Eastin, A Social Cognitive Theory of Internet Uses
and Gratifications: Toward a New Model of Media Attendance, Journal of Broadcasting
and Electronic Media, vol.48, no.3, 2004, p358.

126

 : ( )

(.)1





(.)2


()3

( )4

- 1 :

2006 26. 81
2 - Aine Dunne et al, Young People's Use of Online Social Networking Sites :a Uses
and Gratifications Perspective ,Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 4 No.
1, 2010, p48.
- 3 2014 .132
4 - Samuel Ebersole, Uses and Gratifications of the Web among Students, Journal of
)Computer-Mediated Communication,vol.6 ,no.1,2000. (On line
2015/ 3/7
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00111.x/full

127

 : ( )

(.)1

( )2



( )3
(:)4
-1

.
-2
.
-3
.
- 1 .120
2 - Yacong Yuan, A Survey Study on Uses and Gratification of Social Networking Sites
in China, thesis Master, Scripps College of Communication, University of Ohio, 2011,
p12.
- 3 .274
- 4 .256-254

128

 : ( )

-4

.
-5 ( )

(.)1




.

: ()2

- 1 .132
2 - Ismail Sheikh Yusuf Dhaha and Abdikarim Barqadle Igale, Facebook Usage among
Somali Youth: A Test of Uses and Gratificaitons Approach, International Journal of
Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2013, p301.

129

 : ( )

(.)1





(.)2

:

(.)3

1 - Uwem Akpan et al, Uses and Gratifications of social networking websites among
youths in Uyo, Nigeria, International Journal of Asian Social Science, vol.3, no.2 ,2013
, p361.
2 - Ghulam Shabir et al, Demographics Differences in Social Networking Sites Use:
What Communication Motives Does it Gratify? , International Journal of Social Work
and Human Services Practice, Vol.2. No.5, 2014, p187.
- 3 :

2012 .39

130

 : ( )

(:)1
-1 :

.
-2 :


.
-3 :



.

1 - Nkosinothando Mpofu and Abiodun Salawu, Investigating the use of social

networking sites and their implications for HIV/Aids communication amongst Rhodes
University students, Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory
and Research, vol. 38, no. 1, 2012, pp111-112.

131

 : ( )

( )

()1

.

- 1 .121-120

132

133

(
)
)(SPSS) (Statically package for the social science
:
-1 : :
.
-2 : :

.
-3 : :

.
-4 : :

.

134

(
)

135

( )
(
)


:

: :
-1 :
( )221 ()%58
( )160 ( )%42 ()381
( . ) 5
( ) 5

221

%58.0

160

%42.0

136
381

%100

-2 :
( )191 ( )%50.1
( )190 ( )%49.9 (.) 6
( )6

191

%50.1

190

%49.9

381

%100

-3 : ( )
( )275 ( )%72.2
( )106 ( )%27.8
( .) 7

137

( ) 7

275

%72.2

106

%27.8

381

%100

-4 : ( )
( )128 ( )%33.6
( )127 ( )%33.3
( )126 ( )%33.1
(. )8
( ) 8

128

%33.6

127

%33.3

126

%33.1

138
381

%100

:
-1 :
()205
()%53.8

""

( )156 ( )%40.9 ""

( )20 ()%5.3
" " ( )%94.7
()%5.2
( .) 9
( ) 9

205

%53.8

156

%40.9

20

%5.3

139
381

%100

-2 :

( )157 ( )%43.5 (
) ( )130
( )%36 ( )
( )50 ( )%13.9
( 3 5) ( )24
( )%6.6 ( )
( .)10
( )10
()

1 3

157

%43.5

130

%36

3 5

50

%13.9

24

%6.6

140
361

%100

-3 :

( ) ( )274 ( )%75.9
( )51 ( )%14.1
( ) ( )35 ( )%9.7
( ).
( )
( )% 0.3
()

( )%85.9 ( )1
()11

( ) ( )381 ( )20 .
- 1
2013 .116

141

( ) 11

274

%75.9

51

%14.1

35

%9.7

%0.3

361

%100

-4

(610 -) ()168
( )%46.5 (10 - )
( )75 ( )%20.8 (123-)
( )56 ( )%15.5 (36-)
( )50 ( )%13.9 (612-)
( )12 ( )%3.3 (
)

142

( )
( )1 (.)12
( )12

(610 -)

168

%46.5

(10 -

75

%20.8

)
(123 -)

56

%15.5

(36 -)

50

%13.9

(612-)

12

%3.3

361

%100

-5 :
( )
( )110 ( )%30.5
- 1 .71

143

( )
( ) ()92
( )%25.5 ( )86 ( )%23.8
( ) ( )73
( )%20.2 ( )

( )
( )13
( ) 13

110

%30.5

92

%25.5

86

%23.8

73

%20.2

361

%100

144

-6 :

(
) ( )183 ( )%50.7
( ) ()98
( )%27.1 ( )71 ( )%19.7
( ).
( )9 ( )%2.5 (
) (
) (
)

( ) (.) 14
( ) 14

183

%50.7

98

%27.1

145

71

%19.7

%2.5

361

%100.0

-7 :

( ) ( )256
( )%70.9 () ( )64
( )%17.7 ( )28 ( )%7.8
() .
( )13 ( )%3.6 (
" ")

( )
. ()15

146

( ) 15

256

%70.9

64

%17.7

28

%7.8

( )

13

%3.6

361

%100

-8 :
(

)
( ) ( )287 ( )%79.5
( )66 ( )%18.3
( ) ( )8 ( )%2.2
( ).

147

( )

()
( ) ( )11
( .)%75.9 ( ) 16
( ) 16

287

%79.5

66

%18.3

%2.2

361

%100

-9 :
(
) ( )
( )340 ( )%34.3
() ( )306 ( )%30.9

148

() ( )113 ( )%11.4
( ) ( )103 ( )%10.4
() ( )102 ( )%10.3 ( )
( )14 ( )%1.4 ( ) ( )9
( )%1 ( ) ( )%0.2 ()
()%0.1
( )
() (
) (

) () ( .)1 ()17
( )17

340

%34.3

306

%30.9

113

%11.4

- 1
.43

149

103

%10.4

102

%10.3

14

%1.4

%1.0

%0.2

%0.1

990

%100

-11 :

( ) ( )72
( )%19.9 ( )
( )70 ( )%19.4 ( )
( )58 ( )%16.1 ( )57
( )%15.8 ()
() ( )38
( )%10.5 () ( )36
( ) : .

150

( )%10 () ( )20
( )%5.8 ( )9 ( )%2.5 ()

. ( )18
( ) 18

72

%19.9

70

%19.4

58

%16.1

57

%15.8

38

%10.5

36

%10.0

21

%5.8

%2.5

361

%100

151

-11 :

( )
( )112 ( )%31 ( )
( )94 ( )%26 ( )74
( )%20.5 (
) ()41
( )%11.4 ( )
() ( )40 ( )%11.1
() ( ) ( .)1()%38.9
()19
( )19

112

%31.0

94

%26.0

- 1 .153

152

74

%20.5

41

%11.4

40

%11.1

361

%100

-12 :

:
-

: ()
( )232 ( )%64.3
() ( )88 ( )%24.4 ()
( )41 (.)%11.3

- : ()
( )220 ( )%60.9
() ( )94 ()%26
() ( )47 (.)%13.1
- : ()
( )206 ( )%57.1

153

() ( )94 ()%26
() ( )61 (.)%16.9
- : ()
( )193
( )%53.5 ()
( )114 ( )%31.6 () ()54
( )%14.9 .
- : ()
( )179 ( )%49.6
() ( )148 ( )%41
() ( )34 (.)%9.4
- : ()
( )177 ( )%49 ()
( )122 ( )%33.8 ()
( )62 (.)%17.2
- : () ( )171
( )%47.4 () ( )118
( )%32.7 () ( )72
(.)%19.9

154

- : ()
( )167 ( )%46.3
() ( )105 ( )%29.1 ()
( )89 (.)%24.6
- : ()
( )158 ( )%43.8 ()
( )130 ( )%36 () ( )73
(.)%20.2
- : () ( )134
( )%37.1 () ( )133
( )%36.8 () ( )94
(.)%26.1
- :
() ( )132 ( )%36.6
() ( )123 ()%34.1
() ( )106 ( )%29.3
.

155

- : ()
( )125 ( )%34.6 () ()
( )118 (.)%32.7
- : () ()207
( )%57.4 () ()82
( )%22.4 () ()73
(.)%20.2

(
) ()
() (
) ( )1 ()
( )
( )
( )2 ( )20

- 1 .19
- Yacong Yuan, Op.cit, p34.

156

( ) 20

232

%64.3

88

%24.4

41

%11.3

220

%60.9

94

%26.0

47

%13.1

206

%57.1

94

%26.0

61

%16.9

193

%53.5

114

%31.6

54

%14.9

179

%49.6

148

%41.0

34

%9.4

177

%49.0

122

%33.8

62

%17.2

171

%47.4

118

%32.7

72

%19.9

167

%46.3

105

%29.1

89

%24.6

158

%43.8

130

%36.0

73

%20.2

133

%36.8

134

%37.1

94

%26.1

132

157
%36.6

123

106 %34.1

%29.3

125

%34.6

118

118 %32.7

%32.7

81

%22.4

73

207 %20.2

%57.4

158

: :
-1 :
( )%60.9
( )220 ()
( )132 ( )%366 ()
( )9 ( )%2.5 .
(.)21
( ) 21

220

%60.9

132

%36.6

%2.5

361

%100

-2 :
( )%44
( )155 ( )

159

( )144 ( )%40.9
( 3 - 1) ( )30 ()%8.5
( 5) ( )23
( )%6.6 ( 5 3) ( )22
( )22

155

%44.0

( ) 3 1

144

%40.9

30

%8.5

( )5 3

23

%6.6

352

%100

-3 :

(611 -) ( )180
( )%51.1 (12 3-)
( ) ( )361 ( )9 ()352

160

( )86 ( )%24.4 (3-

6) ( )52 ( )%14.8 (11 -
) ( )34 ( .)%9.7 (.)23
( )23

(610-)

180

%51.1

(123 -)

86

%24.4

(36-)

52

%14.8

(10 - )

34

%9.7

352

%100

-4 :
( )
( )145 ()%16.4
( ) ( )131
( )%14.9 () ( )125 ()%14.2
( ) ( )98 ( )%11.1

161

( ) ( )93 ( )%10.5
() ( )88 ( )%10 (
) ( )79 ( )%8.9
( ) ( )64 ( )%7.3
( ) ( )59 ( .)%6.7 ()24
( )24

145

%16.4

131

%14.9

125

%14.2

98

%11.1

93

%10.5

88

%10

79

%8.9

64

%7.3

162

59

882

%6.7
%100

-5 :
( )177
( )%30.6 ( )
( )127 ( )%21.9
( ) ()112
( )%19.3 ( )
() ( )103
( )%17.8 ( )60 ( )%10.4
( ) . ( .)25
( ) 25

177

%30.6

127

%21.9

( ) : .

163

112

%19.3

103

%17.8

60

%10.4

579

( ) : .

%100

164

( :

) :

-1 :

( )167 ( )%47.4 ()

( )148 ( )%42 ()
( )37 ( )%10.5 ()
( .)26

165

( )26

167

%47.4

148

%42.1

37

%10.5

352

%100

-2 :


( )220 ( )%62.5
( ) ( )71 ( )%20.2
( )41 ( )%11.6 ( )
( )20 ( )%5.7 (.)27

166

( )27

220

%62.5

71

%20.2

41

%11.6

20

%5.7

352

%100

-3 :
(
) ()
( )179 ( )%50.9
() ( )106 ( )%30.1 ()
( )67 ( )%19 (.)28

167

( )28

179

%50.9

106

%30.1

67

%19

352

%100

-4
:



() ( )225
( )%63.9 ( )127 ( )%36.1



(.)29

168

( )29

225

%63.9

127

%36.1

352

%100

-5 :

( ) ( )92
( )%40.9 ( )
( )39 ( )%17.3 ( )31
( )% 13.8
( ).
( ) ( )27
( )%12 (
) ( )15 ( )%6.7 ( )14

169

( )%6.2 ( )
( )7 ( )%3.1 (
) (.)30
( )30

92

%40.9

39

%17.3

31

%13.8

27

%12

15

%6.7

14

%6.2

%3.1

225

%100

( ) : ( ) .

170

-6 :
(
) ( )175 ( )%49.7

( )114 ( )%32.4
( )63
( )%17.9 . (.)31
( )31

175

%49.7

114

%32.4

63

%17.9

352

%100

-7 :
(
) ()

171

( )197 ( )%56 (
) ( )136 ( )%38.6 ( )
( )19 ( .)%5.4 (.)32
( )32

197

%56

136

%38.6

19

%5.4

352

%100

-8 :

( )177 ( )%50.3 (
)
( )128 ( )%36.4 ( ) ()
( )47 ( .)%13.4 (.)33

172

( )33

177

%50.3

128

%36.4

47

%13.4

352

%100

-9 :

( )
( )165 ( )%54.1 ( )102 ( )%33.4
( ) ( ) ( )38
( .)%12.5 (.)34
( )34

165

%54.1

173

102

%33.4

38

%12.5

305

%100

-11 :
(
) ( )187 ( )%53.1 ()
( )141 ( )%40.1 ()
( )24 ()%6.8
()
( )
(.)35
( )35

187

%53.1

141

%40.1

24

%6.8

174
352

%100

-11 :
(
) ( )157 ( )%47.8
( ) (
) ( )51 ( )%15.6 ( )
( )47 ( )%14.3 ( )43
( )%13.1 ( ) (
) ( )19 ()%5.8
( )11 ( )%3.4 (
) . (.)36
( )36

157

%47.8

51

%15.6

47

%14.3

175

43

%13.1

19

%5.8

11

%3.4

328

%100

-12 :
( )203 ( )%29.9
( )
(
) ( )133 ( )%19.6 ()106
( )%15.7
( ) ( )
( )86 ( )%12.7 (
) ( )60
( )%8.9 ( )29 ( )%4.3
( ) . (.)37

() : ( )328 ( )24 ()
.

176

( )37

203

%29.9

133

%19.6

106

%15.7

86

%12.7

60

%8.9

60

%8.9

29

%4.3

667

%100

:
-13


:

( ) : .

177

- : ( )191 ()%54.3
()
( )162 ( )%46 ()
.

- : () ( )157 ()%44.6
() ( )134
(.)%38.1
- : ( )33 ( )%9.4 ( )
( )27 ( )%7.6

( )
. ()38

( )38

162

%46

191

%54.3

157

%44.6

134

%38.1

178

33

%9.4

27

%7.6

352

%100

352

%100

-14 :

:
- : ()
( )235
( )%66.8 () ( )86
(.)%24.4
- : ( )158 ( )%44.9 ()
()
( )105 (.)%29.8
- : ( )108 ( )%30.7 ( )
( )
( )12 ( .)%3.4 ()39

179

( )39

86

%24.4

235

%66.8

158

%44.9

105

%29.8

108

%30.7

12

%3.4

352

%100

352

%100

-15 :

:
- : ()
( )203 ( )%57.7
( ) ( )143 (.)%40.6

180

- : ( )165 ( )%46.9 ()
()
( )121 (.)%34.3
- : ( )44 ( )%125 ( )
()

( )28 ( .)8 ()40
( )40

203

%57.7

143

%40.6

121

%34.3

165

%46.9

28

%8.0

44

%12.5

352

%100

352

%100

181

-16
:

:
- : ( )148 ( )%42
( )86 ( )%24.4
.
- : ( )164 ( )%46.6
()156
( )%44.3
.
- : ( )110 ( )%31.3
( )40
( )%11.4 . (.)41

182

( )41

148

%42.0

86

%24.4

164

%46.6

156

%44.3

40

%11.4

110

%31.3

352

%100

352

%100

-17 :

:
- :
() ( )233
( )%66.2 ( )36 ( )%10.2 ()
.

183

- : ( )80 ( )%22.7 ()
( )77
( )%21.9 () .
- :
( )239 ( )%67.9 ( )
( )39 ( )%11.1
( ) .
(.)42
( )42

36

%10.2

233

% 66.2

77

%21.9

80

%22.7

239

%67.9

39

%11.1

352

%100

352

%100

184

-18
:
(
) :
-

: ( )168 ( )%47.7
( )65 ( )%18.5
.

- : ( )129 ( )%36.6
() ( )114
( )%32.4 () .
- : ( )158 ( )%44.9
( )70 ( )%19.9

( )%44.9

. (.)43

185

( )43

65

%18.5

168

%47.7

129

%36.6

114

%32.4

158

%44.9

70

%19.9

352

%100

352

%100

186

: :
( :
( ))


( )MxN ( )chi-square
:
- :
( )44

103

53

()%27

()%13.9

113

92

()%29.7

()%24.1

)%3.9( 15 )%1.3( 5

13.76

5.99

187

(( ))
( )MxN ( )chi-square
( )13.76
( )0.05 ( )2 ( )5.99
((
))

- :
( )45

82

74

()%19.4( )%21.5

95

110

()%28.9( )%24.9

14

()%3.7

()%1.6

4.71

5.99

188

((
)) MxN ( )chi-square
( )4.71
( )0.05 ( )2 ( )5.99

((
)).

- :
( )46

119

37

()%9.7( )%31.2

146

59

()%15.5( )%38.3

10

10

()%2.6

()%2.6

275

106

6.30

5.99

189

((
)) ( )MxN ( ) chi-square
( )6.30
( )0.05 ( )2 ( )5.99
((
)).
- :
( )47

66

50

40

()%17.3

()%10.5( )%13.1

54

72

()%14.2

()%20.7( )%18.9

5 )%2.1( 8
()%1.3

79

7
()%1.8

12.15

9.49

190

( )
( )MxN

( )12.15 ( )0.05 ( )4
( ) 9.49
(
).
( :
" ").

" "
( )Independent Samples T- Test
:
- :
( )48

199

0.82

224

359

1.96

178

0.92

191

( )Independent Samples T- Test

( )224 ()0.05
( )359 ( )1.96

( )199
( )1.78
(
).
- :
( )49

196

0.89

212

359

1.96

175

0.78

( )Independent Samples T- Test
( )212

192

( )0.05 ( )359 ( )1.96

( )196
( )1.75
(
).
(( :
( ))
((
( ))
) )MxN ( )chi-square
:
- :
( )50

51

)%3.3( 12

()%14.1

155

127

()%42.9

()%35.2

10

)%1.7( 6

193
14.52

5.99

()%2.8

( ) chi-square
( )14.52 ( )0.05 ( )2
( )5.99
((
)).

- :
( )51

23

40

()%6.4

()%11.1

150

132

()%41.6

()%36.6

9.60

5.99

194

12 )%1.1( 4
()%3.3

((
)) MxN ( ) chi-square
( )9.60
( )0.05 ( )2 ( )5.99

((
)).

- :
( )52

47

16

()%13.0

()%4.4

208

74

()%57.6

()%20.5

1.04

5.99

195

)%1.7( 6 )%2.8( 10

( )MxN ( ) chi-square
( )1.04
( )0.05 ( )2 ( )5.99

((
)).

- :
( )53

18

17

28

()%5.0

()%4.7

()%7.8

97

98

87

()%26.9

()%27.1

()%24.1

5.17

9.49

7 )%1.4( 5
()%1.9

196

4
()%1.1

( ) chi-square
( )5.17 ( )0.05 ( )4
( )9.49
((
)).
(( :
" ")).
((
" "))
( )MxN ( ) chi-square
:

197

- :
( )54

51

23

()%14.1

()%6.4

45

49

()%12.5

()%13.6

22

19

()%6.1

()%5.3

75

37

()%20.8

()%10.2

23

17

()%6.4

()%4.7

11.25

9.49

( )chi-square
( )11.25 ( )0.05 ( )4

198

( )9.49
((
))
- :
( )55

30

44

()%8.3

()%12.2

53

41

()%14.7

()%11.4

20

21

()%5.5

()%5.8

55

57

()%15.2

()%15.8

19

21

()%5.3

()%5.8

4.21

9.49

199

( )chi-square ()4.21
( )0.05 ( )4 ()9.49

((
))
- :
( )56

52

22

()%14.4

()%6.1

71

23

()%19.7

()%6.4

29

12

()%8.0

()%3.3

83
()%23.0

29
()%8.0

0.82

9.49

30

10

()%8.3

()%2.8

200

((
)) ( )MxN ()chi-square
( )0.82
( )0.05 ( )4 ( )9.49

((
)).
- :
( )57

27

19

28

()%7.5

()%5.3

()%7.7

26

40

28

()%7.2

()%11.1

()%7.7

15

19

()%4.2

()%1.9

()%5.3

40

33

39

()%11.1

()%9.1

()%10.8

12

23

)%1.4( 5

()%3.3

()%6.4

201
24.07

15.51

( )chi-square
( )24.07
( )0.05 ( )8 ( )15.51

((
)).

202

: :
(( :
" )).
"
" ()Independent Samples T- Test

:
-1 :
( )58

172

0.86

2.01

350

1.96

190

0.94

( )Independent Samples T- Test

( )2.01 ()0.05
( )350 ( )1.96

203

( )1.90
( )1.72
( ).
-2 :
( )59

181

0.92

050

350

1.96

175

0.83

((
)) ( Independent
)Samples T- Test ( )050
( )0.05 ( )350 ( )1.96


( )181 ( )1.75 ((
)).

204

(( :
))
( )
) )A
:
( ) ( )B
( :
)

( ) A
) (B .
( )60

407

%70.3

172

%29.7

579

%100

( ) A
( )407 ( )%70.3
(

205

) ((
)).

:
:
( :
).

( )Paired sample test

:
( )61

2.47

0.64

2.08

351

1.96

2.37

0.65

206

( )Paired sample test

( )2.08 ( )0.05
( )351 ( )1.96

( )2.47 ( )2.37
.
((
)).
( :
):
( ) 62

2.63

0.55

13.30

351

1.96

1.94

0.74

207

(
)
( )Paired sample test
( )13.30 ( )0.05
( )351 ( )1.96

( )2.63 ( )1.94

.
((
)).
( :
):
( )63

2.28

0.67

4.00

351

1.96

2.50

208

0.64

( )Paired sample t- test

((
)) ( )4.00
( )0.05 ( )351 ( )1.96

( )2.50
( )2.28
.
((
)).
( :
):
( ) 64

1.93

0.74

7.34

351

1.96

209

2.31

0.66

((
))
( )Paired sample t- test
( )7.34 ( )0.05
( )351 ( )1.96

( )2.31
( )1.93 .
((
))

210

( : "
" ):
( )65

2.55

0.69

22.40

351

1.96

1.42

0.67

( )Paired sample t- test

(( " "
))
( )22.40 ( )0.05 ( )351
( )1.96
()2.55
( )1.42
.
(( "
" )).

211

:
(
).
( )66

1.89

0.85

163

351

1.96

179

0.89

((
"
"))
( )Paired sample t-test ()163
( )0.05 ( )351 ()1.96

212

.
((
"
)).

213

:
: :
-1 ( )%94.7

(.)%5.3
-2
( )1.99 (.)1.78
-3
( )1.96
(.)1.75
-4 ( )

() () .
-5 ( )
( ) (.)%75.9
-6 (6 10)
(. )%46.5

214

-7
( )%50.7 .
-8 ( )
( ) (.)%70.9
-9 ( )
.
-11
( ).
: :
-1 ( )%97.5
(.)%2.5
-2 (6 10 )
.
-3
( )1.90 (.)1.72
( -4 )
(.)%16.4
-5 ( )
(.)%30.6

215

: :
-1
( )1.99
(.)1.72
-2
( )1.90
(.)1.78
-3

( )1.96
(.)1.81
-4
(.)%62.5
-5 ( )%93.1
.

-6
( )2.47
( )2.37
.

216

-7
()2.63
( )1.94
.
-8
( )2.50
( )2.28
.
-9

( )2.31 ( )1.93
.
-10
( )2.55
( )1.43 .
-11

.

217

.
: .
-1
.1993
-2
.2008
-3 .2004
-4
.2003
-5 :
.2014
: .
-6
.2012
-7
.2010
-8 :
.2011
-9 :
.2012
-10
.2011
-11
.2008

218

-12 2
.1978
-13
.2013
-14 .2009
-15
.2000
-16
.2009 8
-17
.2013
-18 .2006
-19
.2010
-20
.2011
-21
.2011
-22 :
.2013
-23
.2013
-24 :
.2005

219

-25 :
.2013
-26
.2011
-27
.2011
-28
.2013
-29
.2011
-30
.2015
-31
.2007
-32
.2007
-33
.2013
-34 :
.2013
-35
.2014
-36
.2010

220

-37
.2011
-38 2
.1993
-39 : 2
.1999
-40
.2010
-41
.2003
-42
.2013
-43 :
.2010
-44
.2011
-45
.2009
-46 5
.2010
-47
.2013
-48
.2011

221

-49
.2013
-50 :
.2008
-51 2
.1997
-52
.2014
-53
.2014
-54
.2008
-55
.2011
-56 .2005
-57
:
.2013
-58 ( )
.2012
-59

.1985

-60 6
.2009
-61 :
.2011

222

-62 ( )
.2014
-63
.2014
-64
2015
-65
.2014
-66
.2014
-67 :
.2014
-68 :
.2009
-69
.2011
-70
.2013
-71 :
.1985
-72
.2003
-73 :
.2010


-74

223

.2011
-75 : - -
.2011
-76
.2012
-77 " "
.2008
-78
.2014
-79
.2015
-80
.2015
-81
.2012
-82
.2011
-83 .2014
-84 .2002
-85

.2010

-86
.2012
-87
.2007

224

-88

.2009
-89 : .2009
-90 3
.2004
-91
.2013
-92 -
.2006
-93 3
.2006
-94
.2010
-95
.2012
-96
.2003
-97
.2011
-98
.2009
-99 2
.2000

225

-100
.2006
-101 :
.2015
-102
.2014
-103 3
.2010
-104
.2012
-105 .2014
-106
.2011
-107
.2012
-108
.1998
-109
.2013
-110
.2010
: .
-111 :
.2009

226

: -112
.2012
: . -113
.2008
: . . -114
.2010
: 3 - . -115
.1999
: -116
.2014
. :
117- Abd El-Basit Ahmed Hashem ,Uses and gratifications of online
advertising a comparative study between Germany and Egypt ,
dissertation Doctor, Mass communications technical university of
Ilmenau, 2010.
118- Aine Dunne et al, Young People's Use of Online Social
Networking Sites :a Uses and Gratifications Perspective ,Journal of
Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2010.
119- Barbara K. Kaye, Between Barack and a Net Place: Motivations
for Using Social Network Sites and Blogs for Political Information,
Edited: Zizi Papacharissi, A Networked Self: Identity, Community
and Culture on Social Network Sites, New York, Routledge, 2011.
120- Bellarmine A. Ezumah, College Students Use of Social Media:
Site Preferences, Uses and Gratifications Theory Revisited,

227

International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 4, No. 5,

2013.
121- C. Bernard ,p .lazarsfeld and W. mephee, voting :a study of
opinion fornication in a presidential campaign, Chicago university of
Chicago press, 1954.
122- Danah m.boyd and Nicole B.Ellison , social network sites:
definition history and scholarship, journal of computer-mediated
communication ,vol.13,no.1, 2007.
123- Danielle Salomon, Moving on from Facebook Using Instagram to
connect with undergraduates and engage in teaching and learning,
College & Research Libraries News vol. 74, no. 8, 2013.
124- Denis McQuail, McQuails Mass Communication Theory, 6th
edition, London, SAGE Publication, 2010.
125- Eleanor T. Loiacono, Self-Disclosure Behavior on Social
Networking

Web

Sites,

International

Journal

of

Electronic

Commerce, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2015 .

126- Elizabeth M. Perse, and alan m. Roubin, Chronic Loneliness
and Television Use , Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,
vol.34 no.1, Winter 1995.
127- Ghulam Shabir et al, Demographics Differences in Social
Networking Sites Use: What Communication Motives Does it
Gratify? ,International Journal of Social Work and Human Services
Practice, Vol.2. No.5, 2014.
128- Ismail Sheikh Yusuf Dhaha and Abdikarim Barqadle Igale,
Facebook Usage among Somali Youth: A Test of Uses and

228

Gratificaitons Approach, International Journal of Humanities and

Social Science, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2013.
129- Jay G. Blumler ,The role of theory in uses and gratifications
studies, Journal of communication research, vol.6 , no.1, 1979.
130- Jiong Xu, Analysis of Competition between Radio & TV and
Network Media, International Conference on Education Technology
and Economic Management (ICETEM), Beijing, China, Published by
Atlantis Press, 2015.
131- Leekyung Kim , Facebook use among students in Sweden
:Based on uses and gratifications theory and Stephensons the play
theory of mass communication, Master Thesis, Media and
Communication Studies School of Social and Health Sciences

Halmstad University, 2011.

132- Leila Karimi et al, Applying the Uses and Gratifications Theory
to Compare Higher Education Students Motivation for Using Social
Networking

Sites:

Experiences

from

Iran,

Malaysia,

United

Kingdom, and South Africa, Journal of Contemporary Educational

Technology, vol. 5, no.1, 2014.
133- Lin Chao Chen, Convergence of new and old media: new media
representation

in

traditional

news,

Chinese

Journal

of

Communication, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2013.

134- Lisa Jane Orchard, personality as a predictor of facebook
engagement, thesis of doctor, University of Wolver Hampton, 2013.
135- Michael A. Stefanone et al , The Relationship between
Traditional Mass Media and Social Media:Reality Television as a

229

Model for Social Network Site Behavior, Journal of Broadcasting &

Electronic Media, vol.54, no.3 , 2010.
136- Nkosinothando Mpofu and Abiodun Salawu, Investigating the
use of social networking sites and their implications for HIV/Aids
communication

amongst

Rhodes

University

students,

Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory

and Research, vol. 38, no. 1, 2012.
137- Paul M. Leonardi and other , Enterprise Social Media: Definition,
History, and Prospects for the Study of Social Technologies in
Organizations , Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,
vol.19, no.1, 2013.
138- Robert k. Logan, understanding new media: extending Marshall
McLuhan, new York, die deutsche national bibliothek , 2010.
139- Robert LaRose and Matthew S. Eastin, A Social Cognitive
Theory of Internet Uses and Gratifications: Toward a New Model of
Media Attendance, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,
vol.48, no.3, 2004.
140- Samuel Ebersole, Uses and Gratifications of the Web among
Students, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,vol.6
,no.1,2000.
141- Stanley J. Baran and Dennis K. Davis, Mass Communication
Theory: Foundations, Ferment, and Future, sixth edition, Boston,
Wadsworth cengage learning, 2010.

230

142- Steve jones, Encyclopedia of new media: an Essential

Reference to communication and technology , sage publication
,2002.
143- Thomas E. Ruggiero , Uses and Gratifications Theory in the
21st Century, , Journal of mass communication and society ,vol.3 ,
no.1 , 2000.
144- Uwem Akpan et al, Uses and Gratifications of social networking
among youths in Uyo, Nigeria, International Journal of

websites

Asian Social Science, vol.3, no.2 ,2013.

145- Yacong Yuan, A Survey Study on Uses and Gratification of
Social Networking Sites in China, thesis Master, Scripps College of
Communication, University of Ohio, 2011.
:.
-146 :

3 .2006 1
-147
.2010 8
-148
4.1985 2
-149 :

.2007 62
-150 :
.2010 2

231

-151
:2017 -2014
.2014
-152
7.2014 2
-153
. 2008 190
-154
:
.2006 26
-155
.2014 11
-156
.2012 2
-157
.1975 8
-158
.2013 20
-159
.2013 93
-160
25
.2010
-161 :
.1984 13

232

-162
:
26.2012 6
-163 :
15
.2012
-164
26 .2010 2-1
-165 :

.2009 33
-166 :
.2011 3
-167
.2011 3
-168
.2010 4
-169
.2007 2
-170 :
.2008 2

-171

7.2014 1

233

-172

.2013 1
-173

16.2015 2
-174
.2012 2
-175 :
.2011 14
-176

7.2014 2
-177

.2012 398
-178 :
36 .2012
-179
.2012 395
-180

.2012 39
-181
29 .2013 57

234

-182

.2014 34
-183 :
.2011 3
-184 :

2 .2014 7
-185
.2011 27 -26
-186
:
/ 3 .2015
-187
.2010 3
:.
-188

.2014
-189

( ) .2013
-190

235

" " 7-5 .2009
-191

.2012
-192
:
" "
.2012
-193

10-7 .2013
-194
:
.2009
-195 :
15-13 .2011
-196
:
.2009
-197
( )
.2012

236

-198
:facebook (
) .2012

-199

() :

..
.2015
-200
:
.2013
: .
-201
: 2014
.2015
-202

.2013
-203

.2014
-204
:
.2012

237

-205 :

.2012
-206
:
.2010
-207

.2014
-208
:

.2012
: .
-209 . 2015/8/17
http://www.unesco.org/new/ar/social-and-human/sciences/themes/youth
-210 :
.2007 1816 2015/3/19 :
http://www.ahewar.org/debat/show.art.asp?aid=87696
-211 .
2015 / 9 /12
http://cosit.gov.iq/ar/component/content/article/58 -arabic-cat/201302-21-09-00-50/452-studies-28

238

: -212
.2014 16235
http://albayaniq.com/?p=16235 2015/3/7 :
-213
2014/3/12 : .9 2014 11949
http://www.alarab.co.uk/?id=11949
214- New media. In Webopedia 2015/1/9 .
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/N/new_media.html
215- social networking site in encyclopedia PC Magazine .
2015/2/25
http://www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/55316/social-networking-site
216- Social networking site in webopedia. 2015/2/25
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/social_networking_site.html

 ( )1

/

/

(
)

, ,
.

......

. .

 :
-1 :

-2 :
-3 :
-4 :

:
-1

() .
-2 ( )

1 3 3 5 -3
- (

 -4
(612 -) (123 -) (36 -) (610 -) (10 - ) -5
:
-6
-7
( )

-8

 -9 .

-10

-11
- (

-12

10
11
12
13

:
-13

. -14
3 3 5 5 -15 (
)

-16

( )

- (

-17
( 123 -)
(36-)
(610-)
(10 - )
: :
-18

-19

 -20

-21

-22 ,
)

- (

-23
,:
- (

 -24

-25 ,

-26 ,

-27

-28 ( ) ,
- (

 -29 (
)
-

)
(
-30

-31
-

-32
-

 -33

-34 :

-35
-

Abstract
The study addressed using the youth for social network sites and its
relationship to exposure to television, it describes the challenges faced
by the television in the spread of social network sites, and high numbers
of users and in particular the youth class to which it refers many studies
has the most widely used category for social network sites, the study
aimed to reveal the habits and use patterns of youth for social network
sites and determine the needs and motivations of youth use for those
networks, and learn about the habits and patterns of exposure of youth
for television, in addition to the study examines the competitive
relationship and complementarily between social network sites and
television by identifying the extent of the reflection of the use of such
networks on exposure to television and determine the scope of interest
youth to search for content that produced by the television in social
network sites.
The researcher has used the survey approach, which aims to collect
data from respondents, depending on the form of a questionnaire as a
key tool for data collection, was a multi-stage random sample
application to (381) respondents from high school students in Wasit
province, and the study reached several conclusions, including;
1- Higher for youth to use social network sites, as results showed that
(94.7%) of the respondents use social network sites while those who do
not use accounted for (5.3%).
2- The use of youth head for the social networking site for (Face book),
who was one of the most widely used social networking sites for the

respondents and was followed by site (YouTube) in second Rank and the
site (Twitter) ranked third.
3- Show dense young for television, as results showed that (97.5%) of
the respondents watching television while those who don't watch it
accounted for (2.5%).
4- Emphasize that most of the respondents and their percentage (93.1%)
are looking for television content in the YouTube site.
5- Average interest to respondents about their involvement television
sites on social network sites, it got percentage (63.9%).
6- Not affect the use of social network sites to watching television, it
indicated that the results of statistical correlation relations there is no
statistically significant differences between the rate of youth to use
social network sites and the rate of exposure to television channels.

Republic of Iraq
Ministry of higher education and scientific research
Baghdad University
College of mass communication
Department of TV and Broadcasting journalism

Youth Use For social network sites and

its relationship to exposure for TV
(survey - Study on students of high school in Wasit province as a
sample)

A THESIS
Submitted to the Council of mass communication College,
University of Baghdad In partial fulfillment of the requirements
For the Master degree of TV and Broadcasting journalism
By

Muhaned Hameed Ubaid Altimeemi

Supervised by
Prof. Dr. Wisam Fadhil Radhi

2015 A.D.

Baghdad

1437 A.H.