PTE Essays with Solution.

Pros and Cons of extreme/adventure sports.

OR
Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you
support them or not.
Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, popularity of extreme sports has continued to grow over the
last decade. People would like to do some dangerous sports like scuba diving,
bungee jumping, bull fighting,etc in many countries. I am inclined to believe that
these sports are in fact dangerous and they should not be promoted (my opinion in
intro). This essay will discuss some advantages and disadvantages of adventure
sports before giving appropriate conclusion.
Agree (In favor)
On one hand, people who are in favor
of adventurous sports claim, the risktaking sports help in the development
of self-confidence and independence
of a person. For instance, by
successfully facing up the challenges
of adventurous sports like rockclimbing, young people overcome with
their fears. Specifically, going through
a dangerous experience gives them the
courage to face the hurdles of their
daily life (explaining example).
Furthermore, there is a lot of fame and
money involved in these sports.
Performers get attention by doing
stunts on motorcycles and jumping
from tall buildings. In addition, playing
such sports may considered as the
symbol of manpower and something
of gaining prestige in society.

Disagree(Not in Favor)
On the other hand, opponents of extreme
sports say that, being a extreme
sportsmen is very risky and dangerous. If a
rope breaks while bungee jumping, for
example, a participant will be seriously
injured or even die. Also, equipment
needed for these sports are very
expensive, many people cannot purchase
them which eventually increases the chance
of the tragedy. Above all, youngsters who
gravitate towards these types of sports
could not concentrate on their studies, due
to which, they were not able to complete
their studies and hence not able to get
lucrative jobs.

Conclusion:

To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, we can say that
adventure sports have many impressive benefits including problem-solving, selfconfidence and teamwork. However, it is recommended that these sports should be
tried under proper guidance and supervision. The government should provide
adequate knowledge about these sports to athletes so that they can protect
themselves from its dangers.

Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you
support them or not.
Originally Posted by maxngo
I wrote this as a Take side essay:
Extreme sports such as parachuting, bungee-jumping and scuba-diving have
burgeoned ( increase rapidly) to become popular activities today. Some people think
that they are good sports for a stronger personality, while others argue they are very
dangerous and harmful. I am inclined to believe that these sports are in fact
dangerous and they should not be promoted(taking side in intro). The following
paragraphs will analyze their inevitable (unavoidable) dangers and suggest other better
sports for people to participate.
First of all, extreme sports are dangerous and risky (main point 1). These forms of
sports generate high levels of risks and there are always chances of unfortunate events
that will happen (describing point 1). For example, there have been a number of
youngsters who died from participating in scuba-diving in Texas. (example for point 1).
Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale University in 2014 has found nearly
4000 cases of injuries from extreme sports in the USA alone.(support example 1)
Second of all, there are a variety of other forms of sports that are just as exhilarating
and interesting as extreme sports for people to play (main point 2). They not only are
safer but also bring to players a feeling of relaxation and entertainment (describing point
2). As an example, sports such as tennis, football and horse-racing are tremendously
fun to play and also safe (example for point 2).
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that extreme sports are
indeed dangerous and there are many other safer types of sports that people should
participate in instead. It is expected that people take cognizance of this fact and further,
the governments must establish guidelines to educate people about the
aforementioned.

Pros and Cons of extreme/adventure sports.

OR

Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you
support them or not.

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, the popularity of extreme sports have continually increasing
from last few decades. These days in many countries people like to play skydiving,
bungee jumping, bull fighting, and etc rather than going for traditional sports.
Considering this, some analyst argue that people should not play these sports, while
others opine it helps people to increase their confidence. This essay will discuss some
advantages and disadvantages of adventure sports before giving an appropriate
conclusion.
Agree (In favor)

Disagree(Not in Favor)

To begin, most people are keen to play

extreme sports for many reasons.
Perhaps the fundamental reason is
that, people want to overcome fear
against certain things. For example,
bungee jumping, a sport which people
leap off from several hundred metres
high with just a rope tied to their feet,
requires a great deal of courage.
Another important reason is that, these
sports tend to be highly stimulating. It
is often a good way to relieve anxiety
and tension which come from various
aspects. Furthermore, a lot of fame
and money is involved in these sports.
Players easily come in the limelight
by doing stunts on motorcycles and
jumping from tall buildings which
eventually make celebrities. Above all,
playing these games person becomes
physically and mentally fit due to
which he or she can live his or her life
in a healthy way.

On the other hand, opponents of extreme

sports say that, these sports are very
dangerous which may cause lifethreatening threat. For instance, if a rope
tears while bungee jumping, a participant
will be seriously injured or even die. In
addition, equipment needed for these
sports are very expensive, sometimes a
person cannot purchase them which
increases the chance of tragedy.
Furthermore, youngsters who gravitate
toward these types of sports do not
concentrate on their studies, due to which
they are not able to get lucrative jobs.

Conclusion:
To sum up, we can say that adventure sports have many impressive benefits including
problem solving, self-confidence and team-work. However, it is recommended that
these sports should be tried under proper guidance and supervision of a guard.
Government must take appropriate steps to educate people so that tragedies can be
decreased.

Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change

can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree.
(Written by someone)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Climate has been changing since past many years owing to innumerable reasons(intro
line). Some people are thinking that the governments should make changes at the
upper level to protect atmosphere, while others argue that individuals are responsible to
take initiative towards environment change and their impact. I am inclined to believe that
both government and individual are equally have to take part in order to stop polluting
environment (opinion in intro). The following paragraphs will analyse the impact and
reason, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

First of all, people are making huge amount of carbon dioxide emission every days
(main point 1). Thus, individual have to understand the ramifications are arising in many
forms( explaining point 1). For example, because of tremendous amount carbon
dioxide emission, temperature is increasing day by day, melting polar ice and rising
sea level, which will draw to drastic consequences in the globe (example for point 1). As
a result, individuals should establish strategies, and have to work in direction to control
environmental pollution.

Second of all, the governments are in high command, and they can build phenomenon
to diminish pollution issue, which is rising since past era. Environment pollution has
sparked the controversy over the potential effect of this trend on marketing, advertising
and fossil fuel in the recent time just because of governments are lagging behind to
sustain environment. As an example, studies shown that Indian population rising, and
pollution also ameliorating, though, government has taken only 45 corrective decisions
in last three decades.

In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propound the view that every person is equally
responsible as government, and both have to work together to develop pollution free
society for the generation. It is expected that people take cognisance of education and
further, the government should establish the guidelines to reduce pollution.

Environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems? Who do u

think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the government's, organization or
each individual?
Intro:
An essential problem of the 21st century is world pollution which is increasing at an
alarming rate which leads to a moot question who is responsible for this?. Some
people argue that, it is the prime responsibility of the government and big
organizations, while others opine it is an individual responsibility. I personally believe
that, both higher authority and each citizen have to take part equally to protect the
environment. The following paragraphs will analyse the impact and reason, and thus
will lead to a logical conclusion.
Government/
Organization Role
On one hand, the government could
certainly(surely) make more efforts to
reduce air pollution(Main Point 1). Higher
administration can introduce stringent
laws on factories and public, so that gas
emissions from factories and vehicles
which lead to global warming can be
reduced.
Furthermore, the government could also
impose green taxes on drivers and
airline companies (suggestion 2).
Moreover, corporate houses should start
inventing technology which does not
cause pollution to our environment.
For example, in Japan, manufacturing
plants are encouraged to use solar, wind
or water power.

Individual Role
On the other hand, individuals can also
contribute to reducing the carbon
contents from the air (Main Point 2) by
many ways. Firstly, people can prefer
public transportation rather than using
their own private vehicle. For instance,
people can use trains or buses to
commute. This not only helps to save
our fossil fuel but also helps to reduce
the surface temperature of the earth. In
addition, individuals should be
encouraged to stop the use of plastic
bags and prefer paper bags. As a
result, individuals should establish
strategies, and have to work in the
direction to control environmental
pollution.

Environment and pollution (Written by Someone)

No one can overlay the fact that the planet we live on is a serious
threat. Humans are responsible for a variety of environmental
problems, but we can also take steps to reduce the damage that

we are causing to the planet. This essay will discuss

environmental problems and the measures that governments and
individuals can take to address these problems.
The environment is afflicted by two main reasons, i.e. air pollution
and waste. Firstly, rapid industrialization has led to massive
deforestation. Secondly urbanization of rural areas to support
industries has augmented the emission of CO2 leading to Global
Warming, which may have devastating effect on planet in
future. As human population increases, we are also producing
ever greater quantities of waste which contaminates the earth
and pollutes rivers and oceans.
Government, corporations and individuals should work in close
proximity to reduce the impact of this issue. Government can
design and implement strict laws against air polluters. Companies
should produce recyclable and eco-friendly products. As an
individual, we should move towards adapting organic lifestyle.
In a nutshell, we are the reason for this mess and we need to take
measures collectively to live in harmony with nature. Hence
governments and individuals must play their part in looking after
the environment.

Climate change and about the roles that Government, Corporate and Individuals
can play to improve it. (Written by someone)
The global climate has been changing drastically since past decades owing to
numerous reasons and human activities. Some activists believe that environment
change is occurring due to global warming, while others says that lack of the
governments and individuals concentration leads to various atmospheric changes. I am
inclined to believe that both the government and individuals are equally responsible for
causes and their control. The following paragraphs will analyse the potential causes,
underlying responsible authorities, and their measures.

Firstly, global warming is a prime reasons for the environment change. Also, the
global warming leads to rise in temperature, melting polar ice, and thus, increasing sea
levels. This is happening because of the arduous human activities; for example,

people are driving their personal car every day for commuting, which emitting lots of
carbon dioxide in the environment, and using fossil fuel.

Second, the governments and individuals have to take care of the climate in which they
are living in. The governments should run campaigns, and individual have to follow
and promote these adverts awareness into the societies. As an example, the USA
government, organising green seminars every six month in order to think, research
and provide optimal solutions to save environment, and US citizens are actively
becoming members of this seminar clubs.

In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, global warming is a
major concern for the nations for the climate change. Thus, both states and folks both
have to participate actively in this movement of environment change. It is expected that
cognisance of this education and further, the governments should establish climate
change guidelines to educate people.

Packaged Food
Intro:
Over-packaging of food products has become a trend in today's competitive world.
Producers are trying to attract consumers with an attractive packaging of their
products. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opinion that
consumers should avoid over packaged products, while others consider consumers
should buy over packaged products. This essay will give assertion(opinion) on both
sides of the contention(dispute) before delivering plausible conclusion.
Packaging should be done
Should not be
done

On one hand, there are reasonable

arguments in favor of over-packaging from
manufacturer. They say, it helps them
increase the durability, safety and freshness
of products. For instance, the shelf life of
products increase significantly when they
are packed in several layers aluminium foil
and superior plastic. Specifically, this
prevent an item from microbes and other
dust particles while transiting the
products. Furthermore, attractive
packaging could be a significant factor for
selling of the product more in the competitive
market. Thus, the manufacturer's reason for
over packing products seems liable.

On the other hand, people who are

against to over-packaging claims, the
cost of the material use to pack an
item is actually added to the product.
For instance, pills and tablets are
found to be packed in much bigger
and colorful strips than needed which
eventually increases the drug cost.
Moreover, the manufacturers often
use non-disposable wrappers like
plastic which are harmful for our
environmental. In addition, small
amount of real products are often
presented in a large container or
packet and the customers are being
deceived(cheat) by the packet size.
Lastly, the chemical used for
packing can be at bad ailment for
health.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, extra packaging of products has a
detrimental effect on our environment. I personally believe that, consumers,
producers, and sellers have a collective role to avoid over-packaged products
to solve the negative effects. It is also recommended that a government should
spread the awareness among the users about the drawbacks of over packaging.
Do you think that place where person grew has an influence on his
accomplishments? Explain with example. Region affects successful people?

Intro:
It is conspicuous that, the environment where a person grew has a significant impact
on his or her mind. Considering this, some people argue that success of an individual
depends upon the environment in which he has grown up, while others opine
surroundings doesnt affect . However, in my opinion, native places environment is
only one factor and a persons attitude, capability and determination also play a
pivotal role in achieving a success. The following paragraph will discuss both sides
and offer an appropriate conclusion.
Regions affect successful person
On one hand, environment plays an

Regions do not affect successful

person
On the other hand, other factors also play

important role in inculcating many

traits in a person. An individual learns
many qualities such as language
development, leadership, and social skills
from his or her surroundings. For
instance, Mahatma Gandhi a famous
Indian leader received most of his
leadership skills from people with whom
he spent his childhood time. In addition,
individuals who acquired good guidance
from their family and school teachers in
their young age, easily accomplish their
goals and target more easily in the later
part of their life.

a significant role in influence a person. An

individual who has a strong
determination and focussed mind can
overcome problems in the path of his or
her goal. For instance, Amitabh Bachhan,
a famous Indian actor who was rejected
when he gave his first audition proved
himself because of his strong willpower.
Furthermore, there are many people in
our society who took birth in a very poor
family but because of their hard work they
able to change their situation and become
rich.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, only native environment may not be
behind an individuals success. There are a lot of other factors that take an
individual towards success.

Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness
and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion?

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, television is one of the most important inventions of the
21st century. It helps us to see events that take place hundreds and thousands of
kilometers away from us. Some people argue that TV becomes an indispensable part
of our life, while other analysts think opposite to this. I intent to believe that, television
has a pivotal role in our life. Following paragraphs will assert both sides and deliver
appropriate conclusion.
Advantages of TV

Disadvantages of TV

To begin, television helps us to make our

life more creative. It provides a wide
range of channels like tourism, travel,
foods, lifestyle, news, and many more,
the information broadcasted in these
channels is so useful that it helps people
to increase their mental horizon.
Moreover, news and discovery
programmes can help to make young
people more aware of surroundings. For
instance, by watching discovery channel
students could learn lots of things which
may help them in their studies. Also,
retired persons who are mostly free can
pass their time by watching television.
Thus, television helps every age group in
different ways.

On the other hand, television has some

disadvantages too. Firstly, staring at
televisions screen for a long period can
be harmful to the eyes and the nerves.
Moreover, children who watch action
serials or movies are more aggressive
and start losing their control from
themselves. For instance, in 2010 in
America, around 20% of juvenile crime
made by those children who watch
regularly fighting movies or programmes.
Lastly, students waste their time in front
of a television for hours and that really
affects on their academic results.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, TV is a great medium of getting knowledge
and to enhance our mental horizon. But, it should be noted that excess of every thing
is bad. I believe, we should use this device properly to reduce its side-effects.
Government must take initiative to educate people about its drawbacks.

Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to
take any decisions. Discuss

Intro:
Innovations and new ideas are very important for companies to be able to remain as a
part of the competition. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opinion
that employees suggestions should be considered in companies, while other opines it
is the sole responsibility of the management team. I am inclined to believe that
employees suggestions must be considered by organizations. Both sides will be
critiqued before the reasoned conclusion is found.
Should TAKE suggestions
On the one hand, higher authorities
should consider employees suggestions.

Should NOT TAKE suggestions.

On the other hand, people who advocate
that only management should take

It is a fact that people working in the

particular area know the ins and outs of
the processes more deeply than others.
For example, a person who operates
machines in production plant knows better
how the efficiency of the company can be
increased effectively. Furthermore,
involving employees also saves money
and time of the organisation.
Specifically, companies who involve their
employees in taking decisions do not
depend on experts or outsourcing
which eventually save companys
resources. Moreover, the engagement of
employees in decision making creates a
very positive impression and inspires
them to work better. The employees start
feeling as part of the company and their
output significantly increases.

decisions claims, employees may give

advice in which they have their
personal benefit, which could be
harmful to the company. For instance,
workers can give advice to the
management to reduce the working
hours. In addition, taking suggestions
from everyone would only lead to
chaos. If selected people are in the
board of decision they can easily reach to
the solution without any dilemma.

Conclusion:
To sum up, I pen down by saying that, an organization can only flourish well where
its employees are given the freedom to innovate and rewarded for the same. Top level
management should be smart enough to judge its plausibility of implementation,
as the final decision has to be taken by them.

Celebrities (Written by someone)

Today, many youngsters follow celebrities like sports stars and film stars as
their role models. This can be seen all over social media. It is disagreed to
follow them and this will be considered by taking into account immoral acts
of sports personalities and derogatory roles played by film stars.
To begin with, recently many cases have been published of athletes using
illegal power boosters like drugs or steroids. This impacts negatively on
the minds of his/her follower. For an instance, Lance Armstrong, winner of
several Tour de France races, was found guilty of using performance
enhancing drugs. Hence, youngsters should be discouraged to follow such
sports star.
Secondly, film stars only show their facade to public and not their real life. It
is also seen glamorous film stars playing derogatory roles in movies. For an
instance, Sanjay Dutt, an Indian actor has played roles of mafia or villain,
taking drugs, robbing banks and living a lavish lifestyle. This sets a bad

example for adolescents. Also, he has been found guilty in the court of law,
for some illegal activity. This exemplifies that such film stars should not be a
role model. Youngsters admiration of these personalities should not be
supported.
On the other hand, we also see celebrities doing charity and have
inspirational talent to showcase. This analysis proves that all successful
celebrities may not be role models.
In a nutshell, youngsters should not follow this jazzy personality blindly. It is
recommended to teach youth to follow virtuous characters.
Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u
support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)

Intro:
Today, many youngsters follow celebrities like sports stars and film stars as their role
models.
or
It is irrefutable to say that, professional sports stars and film stars, nowadays,
have become famous public figures to millions of people around the world, especially
the young people. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opinion that
these stars should become a role model for young people, while others consider that
they should not be. I am inclined to believe that, following a good role model will be
beneficial for adolescents. This essay will assert both sides of the statement and
deliver reasonable conclusion.
Agree (Follow them)

Disagree (do not follow

them)

To begin, there are many benefits of

making celebrities as a role model.
Firstly, there are many sports
personalities who are actively
participating in social activities like
helping poor children to study and
creating awareness on protecting
national heritage. These things definitely
stand as motivation to the young
generation. Secondly, some famous
entertainment stars deliver very
meaningful movies which involve lots of
creativity, this helps children to think like
them. For instance, Aamir Khan, an
Indian actor, acted various roles in
movies which can motivate children to
become like him.

On the contrary, seeing stars as role

models also have a number of downsides.
First of all, youngsters start getting
inspired from their negative roles and
imitating the same act at home or in
streets can have a severe impact on the
society. Moreover, celebrities are often
found in smoking advertisements,
charged with drugs and other criminal
activities, youth following their path can
result in the destruction of ethical values
of a society. For instance, Sanjay Dutt,
Bollywood Actor is well known for his roles
as a villain, his terrorist acts in different
movies have given rise to violence and
crime in streets of Mumbai. All these were
committed by adolescents for thrill and
adventure.
On the other hand, seeing sports stars as
role models also has a number of
downsides.First of all, regardless of the
role of performing in matches and games,
athletes have no moral sparks or
admirable lifestyles for children to follow.
For instance, some popular sports stars
may have money, fame and appear
prominently on covers of numerous
magazines but this doesnt mean that the
youth should worship them as a hero
outside the stadiums, so if you are
particularly keen on their moral guidance
and a perfect way of studying, you are
amazingly mistaken. Secondly,
relationship between athletes and kids
are just similar as celebrities with fans,
their appearance in public and in front of
reporters is usually just an outer shell in
order to blur away many scandals and bad
sides. However, these cannot be
compared to its good sides.

Conclusion:
In summary, the entertainment industry caters different types of celebrities that could
set out negative or positive effects to young people. I believe, if adolescent follows

well- mannered celebrity it would helpful for him to become more successful in his
life.

Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's

performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a
satisfactory way to do this.
The examination system has long been a serious bone of contention in our society.
Many opine that this can be done only by continual assessment of their assignments
and project work. On the other hand, people are in favojr of formal examination. The
following paragraphs will analyse the inevitable reasons and examples, and thus, will
lead to a logical conclusion.
Agree (Formal
Examination)

Disagree (Formal Examination)/

Assessment

To start, there are two main benefits of

formal examination. Firstly, in this
system, all students get an equal
opportunity to show their caliber. In
this system, all students get the same
amount of time to give an exam, which
eventually helps teachers to filter
bright students from average children.
Secondly, the examination that are
taken in educational institutes are
conducted in the presence of an
invigilator. This will help to check the
grasping power of the student. For
instance, students have to give
answers without any help of books or a
person, because of this, the memory
of students can be tested on real time
basis.

On the other hand, continual assessment

helps to judge those students who are slow
in studies and do not give their best output
in time constrained exam. For example,
lower age group children under 8 years get
normally confused and not able to perform
well when their exam is conducted under
restricted time.
(In addition, the outcome depends on
various factors such as whether the
examination is conducted in a conducive
atmosphere, whether the student is healthy
during the time of the examination and also
the students mood.)Furthermore, a single
examination may not cover the scope of
the subject completely especially in broad
subjects such as medicine and law.
On the other hand, this assessment style
is vulnerable to cheating, fraud and
human error. Students' use variety of
methods to cheat and they may move
above their peers. Furthermore, often
exams get rescheduled because of paper
leak. Many students' send their papers to
re-check and bribe the examiners if they are
not happy with the mark.

Conclude:

To conclude, I pen down saying that, it is evident that both continual assessment and
formal examinations are effective in different ways, but they also have some
weaknesses. I believe, depending on student ability, the evaluation procedure should
be selected. Faculty of institutes and schools must be well trained so that, they can
apply holistic approach for students development.

Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. you opinion. good or
bad?(Written by someone)
---------------A consumerism trend is growing drastically, and popularity of shopping
malls is increasing because of ample of convenient and comfortable
reasons. Some people believe that this boosting fever of shopping mall
ruining the sales of small retailers in the open market while others argue
that shopping malls are advance great development. The following
paragraphs will analyse the inevitable reasons and examples, and thus, will
lead to a logical conclusion.
Firstly, the conspicuous reason is that shopping malls are collection of
small retailers at one place with having all facilities such as restaurants,
entertainments, variety of item options available. Also, shopping malls are
easy to access because it has huge free or minimal fee parking
available, which makes customer or visitor visit far easy. For example,
Westfield is a very popular shopping mall in all around Australia, which
convey all these facilities at minimal effort and price as compared other
shops.
Secondly, Shopping malls are located near to the central district in
every suburb, which provides great option visit place. As an example,
people are tend to visit shopping malls for fun, get together, entertainments
and more. Thus, shopping malls are becoming very popular in terms of
meeting place for innumerable reasons. In addition, many shopping malls
always having huge discount sales every end of the month, which
attract many customers those are going to local market and paying high
price for the same item.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, shopping
malls are extremely convenient, easy to access, and providing large set of
item ranges to buy for consumers. Thus, it can be said that shopping malls
are great development into todays era.

Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss
with appropriate examples.

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, world has become a global village. A great number of
international shopping malls are opening their branches in almost all cities of the
world. Considering this, there are some analysts who hold an opine that large
shopping malls are replacing small shops, while others argue that malls are vital for
economic development. The following paragraphs will describe both sides of the
statement before deducing a reasonable conclusion.
In Favour of Malls
To begin, there are many reasons for
people to believe that large shopping
malls are important for society. Firstly,
these giant malls offer various kinds
of shops at one place. Due to which,
people can easily purchase things
under one roof. Secondly, these
shopping malls are monitored by
security guards, hence visitors feel
comfortable when they walk around
the malls. For example, security
cameras are placed at different angles
and at different locations for tight
surveillance.

Against Malls
On the other hand, these shopping malls
have some drawbacks also. These days
more and more people choose to go to
large shopping malls, due to which the sales
of small shops are going down. As a
consequence, many of these shops owners
have to close their business or have to
reduce the number of employees. In
addition, heavy discounts are offered by
malls in festival seasons which also gravitate
more buyers and divert their attention
towards traditional and small shops. For
instance, around 50% discounts are given to
customers during christmas time. Thus,
people mostly prefer to buy things from malls
not from local shops.

Conclude:
To recapitulate, I personally believe that, the existence of shopping malls will boost
the economic growth of the city. But, many people still depend on small shops for their
livelihood. So it is the government task to make some strict regulations about this
issue.

Some people think that technology improves the quality of life whereas others
feel that creates new problems that threaten the quality of life. Discuss both these
views and suggest your opinion?
or
Talk about the pros/ cons of this era as is full of daily inventions.

Intro:
Science and technology have great influence on human life since their inception
(establishment). A lot of technological advancements have been taking place day by
day, and which are conspicuously affecting people's life. Considering this, some
analysts argue that technology is improving our life, while, others think it is creating
problems. This essay focuses on some pros and cons of technological advancements
and asserts the appropriate conclusion.
Pros of technology in this Era
To begin, technology has made our life
very comfortable. It is clear that
computers these days are so efficient and
easy to use for people that they become
a part of their life. People can do
everything on computers which save their
time and effort. Furthermore, with the
advent of electronic communication
world has become a global village. For
instance, VOIP technology helps people
to do face-to-face conversation with their
kin and kith anytime. Moreover,
technology enhances the students
interest and intimacy towards their
studies. They can watch recorded video
tutorials to clear their concepts in any
field. Also, medical discoveries occur at
a much more rapid rate; thanks to
machines and computers that aid in the
research process and allow for more
intense educational research into medical
matters.

Cons
On the other hand, technology also brings
some threats to people. Firstly, the
inventions of weapons especially
nuclear war gadgets are extremely
dangerous for the existence of the
entire life forms on the Earth. Secondly,
an increased use of motor vehicles
causes the contamination of the
environment which eventually causes
certain problems such as rise in a
surface temperature and global
warming. Lastly, companies that depend
heavily on computer systems to conduct
business can come to a virtual
standstill if the system breaks down.

Conclusion:
In a conclusion, I pen down saying that, the advantages of technologies outweigh
disadvantages. However, as every garden has some weeds, higher authorities must
take appropriate steps to reduce its negative effects.

Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society
in general.
or
In the past 100 years, there have been many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes and
computers. What do you think is the most important of them? Why? Greatest invention in
the last 100 years, medicine, science or technology?

Intro:
Science and technology have great influence in human life since their inception
(establishment). A lot of technological advancements have been taken place till now,
but in this century, computers are considered as the most revolutionary invention
for the development of human beings. This essay will talk about some of the
advantages and disadvantages of computers before delivering plausible conclusion.
Benefits
To begin, there are many aspects of
computers. Firstly, these days computers
are very efficient and easy to use that
they become a part of everyones life.
People can do everything on computers
which save their time and effort.
Secondly, information technology has
made our world as a global village. For
instance, skype, the computer
application helps people to do face to
face conversation with their kin and kith
anytime. Thirdly, it enhances the
students interest and intimacy
towards their studies. They can watch
recorded video tutorials to clear their
concepts in any field. Lastly, the
computer helps us to manipulate stored
information, due to which we do not
need to rewrite whole paper because
of any mistake.

Drawbacks
On the other hand, it is argued that due to
more dependency on computers
nowadays, life has become more
complicated. Overuse of computer not
only causes strain on eyes which lead to
poor eyesight but also affects people's
health and causes several diseases. For
instance, according to the recent research,
around 40% of American children are
suffering from obesity and the root
cause of this is they spend on an average
4 hours per day in front of the computer. In
addition, children are too much addicted
to computer games that they are
becoming more introvert.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, computer is the most wonderful gift of our life.
It made our life more easy and comfortable. Government must take initiatives to
educate people about its negative effects so that everyone can get maximum benefit
from these inventions.

Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had
some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?
or
Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and
cons impacts.

Intro:
Information technology has brought the world closer together and made it a global
village. Now, we can not only share an information quickly and efficiently, but we can
also bring down barriers of linguistic and geographic boundaries. This essay will
discuss pros and cons of mass communication on individual lives before delivering
conclusion.
In favour
To begin, technology has drastically
changed the way of mass communication.
Now, with the help of smartphones, we
can communicate with anyone around the
globe by simply sending a text message
or sending them an email. In addition, we
can do face-to-face communication with
our kin and kith with the help of video
conferencing. For instance, skype, the
computer application helps us to do video
conferencing with the help of internet. Also,
students can take online coaching
regarding their subjects by sitting at home.
This eventually could save their travelling
time.

Not In Favour
On the other hand, some people believe
that an information revolution has
decreased the privacy of individuals.
From cell phones signals to email
hacking, people are worried about their
private information, which could be
stolen and misused. Furthermore,
traditional culture of many countries is
now changing.To exemplify, youngsters
in Third World countries who watch
Hollywood movies try to copy lifestyle
of people of developed countries, hence,
they stop giving respect to their culture.
Lastly, as information on the internet is
in English language, many other
languages are losing their importance.

Conclude:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, mass communication has tremendous
benefits for all of us. But, we should keep in our mind that every garden has some
weeds, so government should create some laws to handle negative side of mass
communication.

It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a
good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, professional life and married life both have a pivotal role in
our life. An individual cannot live peacefully if there is no synchronization between
these two lives. Considering this, some people argue that getting married prior to
settlement of career is good, while others opine people must complete their academic
path first. This essay will assert both sides of the argument before delivering a
reasonable conclusion.

Agree
To begin, if a person marries in an early
age then he or she has more time to
spend with their loved ones before
they die. Moreover, in developed
countries, mostly parents force their
children to live separately. Specifically, if
these youngsters get married earlier
they get a partner to help them.
Furthermore, girls have many
restrictions in their parents house. But
when they marry they get more freedom
to go out with her husband and enjoy
the life more.

Disagree
On the other hand, there are many
disadvantages if a person marries before
30 years. Firstly, individuals have to take
more responsibilities toward their
family, due to which, they do not get
enough time to study and most of them
leave their study. Secondly, women have
to sacrifice their professional life
because of caring their children and they
have to depend on their husband. Thirdly,
marrying at an early age also increases
the population. For instance, according to
India's 2014 population statistics, it is
proved that people who married in early
age have greater number of children as
compared to those who married in late in
their life. Lastly, as maturity level is low in
youngsters chances of divorce increases.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, marrying late is a better option
than marrying in early age. This makes a person a more responsible and
mature before taking this crucial step.

Some people believe law changes human behaviour. Do you agree/disagree?

Intro:
Laws have a vital role in our society. They are laid by the government and required to
keep the society and country in an order and harmony. Considering this, some people
believe that laws can change human behavior, while others think laws only give
direction to humans so that chaos in society can be prevented. This essay focuses on
both sides of the argument and asserts the appropriate conclusion.
Agree

Disagree

To begin, laws play an essential role

in development of the society. It
helps in smooth functioning of the
nation by governing the behavior of
people. For instance, traffic lights
helps people to travel easily without
creating any chaos.

However, enforcing laws can place limits on

the behavior of people, it really never can
change the human nature which is
immutable. This seems to be a very
plausible(reasonable) point
l
On the other hand, imposing laws has
created a sense of fear among people of
getting punished. For instance, damaging the
historical monuments, books or another
form of art is considered a crime and is
punishable under vandalism law. It infuses a
fear in the public that if they do some illegal
activity, they will be punished. If this fear will
not be there, then the instances of terrorism
and crimes will increase that will make the life
of the members of society unstable and
disturbed. Laws make our lives comfortable.

In conclusion, we can say that rules and regulations can help in controlling the
behaviour that is dangerous. Laws not only help in checking the reckless nature of
people but are necessary for the development of society.

Some people believe that law can change human behavior. Do you
agree / disgree?(Written by someone)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Human behavior is bound with their natural instinct and feelings to others. However,
some people think that human behavior can amend by imposing ample of laws and
regimes, while others argue that behavior cannot be changed using limited laws and
regulations. I am inclined to believe that law only helps to prevent crime and culprit
activities in the human hood, but it is agreed to say that it cannot change human
thinking and behavior at certain times. The following paragraphs will analyse the
inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

First of all, laws are assisting/help in preventing criminal activities in every facet of
human community. Also, law bonds to/ encourage citizens of a country to act in certain
ways by providing a specific list of the rule of codes. For example, a person cannot
murder someone because of criminal act 190, in which he has to face death sentence

by the power of law. As a result, individuals stop pursuing activities which lead to
major and minor offenses, but it cannot change their thoughts.

Second of all, human nature and behavior are inborn qualities, these cannot be
changed at any stage of life span, but indeed, it can be controlled using various
regulations. For example, Darwin has proved by research that humans have been
evolving since past many centuries just only because of their acting, behavior and
feelings. Thus, it is certainly true that none of law can stop acting individuals according
to their desire into the society.

In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, human behavior has
strict relation with predefined laws into the society, though; it does not change their way
of behavior and thinking according to their beliefs.

Parents should be held legally responsible for their childrens acts. What is your
opinion? Support it with personal examples.

It is irrefutable to say that, violence by juveniles has increased in recent years at an

alarming rate in our society. Children are involving themselves in crime and making
our society jeopardize. Considering this, some people opine that parents should be
responsible for their young ones fault, while others argue parents should not be
punished. The following paragraphs will analyze the inevitable reasons, and thus will
lead to a plausible conclusion.
Disagree

Agree

On one hand, parents should not be

blamed for their childrens fault as
the decision to commit the crime is
entirely made by the children.
There are many parents who have
done their best part in the
upbringing of their children so that
their child cannot commit any
offence, yet, their offspring still
succeed in committing the same.
Moreover, mass media is playing
crucial role in making adolescents
aggressive. For example, currently,
there are many violent games and
movies that are being released in the
market. This makes a childs more
violent which could be one of the
reasons for committing the crime.

On the other hand, parents should be held

accountable(responsible) for their childrens
crimes because parents are the first people
that a child gets to know after he or she is
born. It is believed that parents start shaping
the childs moral compass and character
from a very young age. In addition, most of the
children do offense because they were
violently abused by their parents when they
were young. For instance, according to 2013
statistics, in America, most offense were made
by juvenile belongs to a criminal family.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, parents should not be solely blamed and
punished for their childrens actions. Other factors should be taken into account when
deciding on whom to blame. The government must take some prudent steps to
educate children in their schools, so that they do not commit crime.

Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts,
and in what ways this can impact on their reputation.

Intro:
It is conspicuous that, shopping culture has been changed from the last one decade.
More and more companies these days offering lucrative deals to gravitate more
customers toward themselves. Considering this, some people believe that offering
discounts by companies decrease company's brand value, while others opine it helps
to increase organizations revenue. The following paragraphs will analyze the
inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
Disagree
To begin, people who claim discounting
degrades brand value claim that, the profit
margin in the stores will decline as the
goods are sold at reduced prices.
Sometimes, these prices may even be

Agree
On the other hand, offering discounts
increases the customer base of the
organizations. People prefer to do
more shopping during a sale,
discounts encourage people to

below than market value. Furthermore,

giving discounts to customers may
encourage them to ask for it all the time
and if the marketer does not give a best
deal, they may get discouraged and look
at other places for the same. Above all,
discounting can actually hurt organizations
business in the long run. For instance, if a
company is giving discounts on time to
time basis it shows that it has a lack of
confidence on its products and customer
may think that the product is not
trustworthiness.

spend more. Moreover, many

businesses have monthly, quarterly or
yearly sales goals. For instance, if a
business is in danger of missing these
goals, offering discounts can help the
business to meet their sales figures.
Additionally, discounting items enable
you to free up room in stores,
clearing last season's stock, or outdated models. For instance, Reebok,
the clothing company, offers discount
up to 60% during Christmas days. It
helps the company to clear the last
year stock so that new items come on
store shelves.

Conclusion:
To sum up, I would like to say, although discounts decreases the margin of the
company, but it helps customers to buy branded things at reasonable price. Thus,
giving discounts do not decrease brand value of the company but increase customer
base.

Illiterate of 21st century (Written by someone)

The advancement of the contemporary era has literally changed the definition of
literacy. With rapid technological changes, it has become imperative to adapt new skills
and dump the obsolete. It is agreed that to stay relevant to the constantly changing
environment one must not only know how to read and write, but also need to know how
to learn, unlearn and relearn. This essay will discuss compelling reasons to accord the
rubric.
Firstly, innovative inventions is changing the way we do things. For an instance,
computer's Operating Systems started with DOS and recently an upgraded version
-Windows 10 has been released. It was mandatory for an individual to unlearn DOS
and learn and relearn the upgraded versions to stay afloat in the Sea of Changes.
Moreover, to stay relevant with the technology, it has become essential to keep on
learning constantly. The latest innovation in telecom sector - smartphones with
advanced cameras and multi-tasking features lured people to buy it and imposed
them to learn and relearn the new features of the new phones. This exemplifies that
to be known as literate in this century, one must repeatedly update the learning
process.

This analysis proves that to be relevant of this era of regular inventions, embracing the
changes is the mantra of life. In a nutshell, those open to learn, unlearn, and relearn will
be the new literates and it is expected to persist in upcoming decades.
Illiterate of the future would not be one who does not know to read, but people
who do not know how to learn.
or
The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but
those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Agree or Disagree?

Intro:
Learning is an indispensable part of our life. From birth till death, a person grasp new
things and use them in his or her daily life. Considering this, some people argue that a
person who do not know the art of learn, unlearn, and relearn is an illiterate in 21st
century, while others opine this is not mandatory to survive. The following paragraphs
will analyze some inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
Agree
First of all, learning is very important for us to survive in this contemporary era.
Technology is evolving rapidly in many industries and reducing labour drudgery
work. For instance, in manufacturing and agriculture business, labour work is almost
obsoleted and replaced by robots and artificial intelligence. So, a person who has
an urge to grasp new things and not resistant to metamorphosis can survive
easily. In addition, learning also improves persons creativity and imagination. As
a result, this helps a person to invent new things which can help our society to live
properly.
Second of all, many academic researcher
Conclusion:
In conclusion, I would like to say that,

Nowadays, people spend too much time at work, to the extent that, they hardly
have time for their personal life. Discuss.
Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, these days jobs are becoming slavemasters. People are
spending a mammoth part of their day in their offices to meet the cut-throat

competition and neglecting their personal and family life. Considering this, some
analyst opine that this trend is good for our society, while others argue opposite to it. I
am inclined to believe that, work-life balance should be present in an individuals life.
The following paragraphs will analyze the inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a
logical conclusion.
Agree
To begin, there are many reasons why
people do overtime work. Firstly, due to
globalization, employees are facing
competition all around the world,
which instigate(encourage) them to give
their best. Secondly, companies are
creating project deadlines too small
which eventually pressurize employees to
deliver their work in a short time. For
example, multinational companies for their
own profit put more pressure on their
employee for their own profit.

Disagree
On the other hand, long working hours
could affect persons health and
personal relations. To exemplify,
American Health Associates (AHA), finds
that grey matter of software engineers
who sit in front of computers for longer
than 11 hours daily decreases and
causes memory related problems.
Furthermore, another problem with this
set up is the effect it has on a persons
family and social life. When people
spend long hours in the office, they get a
little time to spend with their dear
ones, because of it, children are
deprived of the attention they deserve
from their parents.

Conclusion:
To recapitulate, proper work-life balance is essential to lead a contented life. It is
hoped that, companies arrange their working hours in such a way that employees
also get some time for themselves.

Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive
for their future aspect or have some adverse effects. Agree or disagree?

In the globalized world, studying a foreign language is very helpful to communicate

with other nations people. It is irrefutable to say that, to succeed in the highly
competitive world, a person must be bilingual or multilingual. Some analysts claim
that primary school is the best place for learning another language, while others claim

children should not be forced to learn. The following paragraphs will analyze the
inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
Benefits (Should

Drawbacks (Should not

learn)

learn)

To begin, studying a foreign language in

an early age has many advantages.
Firstly, learning a foreign language is
helpful for the growth of a childs brain.
A study by United Nations, for instance,
has proved that learning any language
other than the natives mother tongue,
activates various parts of the brain,
which eventually make a child intelligent.
Secondly, by studying foreign language, a
child can easily communicate with Alien
Land people and can understand their
culture and lifestyle. Thirdly, knowing a
foreign language will help a child to
express things more clearly as they
have a wider range of vocabulary than
those who start late.

On the other hand, putting excess

pressure on kindergarten pupils to
learn a foreign language have downsides
also. It, indirectly, increases the burden
of a primary school students, due to
which, they will not able to understand
important subjects such as Science
and Mathematics, fundamentally.
Moreover, children may get confused
because of learning many languages at
the same time and this could have a
negative impact on their personality
development. For example, it is claimed
that bilingual children develop the ability
to talk more slowly than monolingual
kids.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the benefits of learning a foreign language in early age are apparently
outweigh the drawbacks. I believe, a person equipped with more languages definitely
help the society to make it more prosperous and flourished.

In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the

opposite as well.
Intro:
It is conspicuous that tourist industry has grown enormously over the last five
decades and people are travelling from one country to another for many reasons.
Considering this, some people opine that tourism has tremendous benefits to the
developing countries that host it, while others argue it has lots of drawbacks. The
following paragraphs will analyze the inevitable reasons, and thus will lead to a logical
conclusion.
Agree

Disagree

To begin, there are significant benefits

that tourism brings to a country. Firstly, a
thriving(flourishing) tourist industry
implies an increasing need for a variety
of services such as hotels, transport,
restaurants, and entertainment. This
eventually results in increase in a
number of jobs being created for people
who lack a college education. Secondly,
tourism also helps to understand the
foreign culture more deeply. For
instance, many tourists go to India
and live there for many years and get
first-hand experience of its culture.
Moreover, tourism is a "Green Industry
and generates a low level of pollution.

On the other hand, there are some

harmful aspects of tourism. A country may
suffer from the loss of their traditional
culture. For instance, youngsters in
Third World nations try to copy a
lifestyle, customs, and language of
tourists. This may vanish their traditional
culture radically. Furthermore, to gravitate
more tourists and profits, the government
are doing deforestation and building
attractive places, because of it, carbon
contents are increasing and causing
much health related problems. In addition,
countries spent major budget to attract
tourist which could be used in other
problems like in research, poverty
etcetera.

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, a nation should seek to develop its tourism
industry because it boosts its economy and improves relationship with other countries.
However, proper rules and regulations must be created by higher authorities to protect
nations environment.

The only thing that interfere with my leaning is my educationEinstein. What does he mean by that? And do you think he is
correct?
Education plays a pivotal role in everyones life by building personality, improving
knowledge and skills. In the traditional education system, the content of syllabus was
very confined and related to only religion, philosophy, metaphysics and scriptural
subjects. This is the reason why Einstein considered education to be the biggest
barrier to his learning. This essay will assert both sides of this statement before
delivering plausible conclusion.
Drawbacks of Education

Benefits of Education

According to Einstein, students who learn

through a formally designed education
system are restricted to their thought
process and they not able to think out
of box. In addition, there are some rigid
rules like age of admission, content and
duration of course which are designed by
government or designated agency such as
school.

On the other hand, schooling is very

important for children as it helps to
enhance their mentality and
creativity. In addition, in contemporary
world education is aided with a variety
of technology which helps students to
understand things fundamentally. For
instance, the internet provides a vast
information which helps learners to
improve their knowledge. Moreover,
these days cut-throat competition is at
its peak, having an adequate
education helps a person to get a
lucrative job.

To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, having appropriate
education has number of benefits. The government and administration must take
some prudent steps to enlighten adolescents about importance of education.

Value added by travel in Education. Is travel a necessary component of education

or not? Will scholar sitting at home have more knowledge?
Education plays a pivotal role in everyones life by building personality, improving
knowledge and skills. ..
The following paragraphs will discuss some inevitable reasons before delivering
plausible conclusion.

On the one hand, travelling helps students in many way. Visiting new places not only
help in broadening scholars mentality but also helps them to understand things
more practically. In addition, reading books or theoretical lectures deliver half
knowledge to students, but travelling clears their doubt and help them to
understand things radically and fundamentally. To exemplify, students are taught in
their classrooms about hills, valleys, lakes, and animals, but travelling provide them
vivid picture of these subjects. Hence, travelling is very important for learners.
On the other hand, with the advent of information and technology, scholars can
visit any place in fraction of second virtually. This not only save their precious time
but also their efforts. For instance, Google maps, an online website has three
dimensional pictures of various places and it is so simple to use that even an

adolescent can access it efficiently. Furthermore, videos of different places are also
available on the internet and scholars can get a feeling that they are actually present
there. Thus, with the help of technology, travelling is not the only option to get a first
hand knowledge.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that, .

Travel to study is over rated, we have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is
travel really required for higher studies? (foreign study)
It is irrefutable to say that, these days more and more students try to get an admission
in foreign universities. Considering this, ., while others opine . I am inclined to
believe that, travelling to study has both advantages and disadvantages. The following
paragraphs discuss some inevitable reasons before delivering plausible conclusion.
Agree
To begin, studying abroad has many
benefits. Firstly, the quality of
education in foreign countries is
excellent. These institutions offer a
wide range of subjects that are not
available in Third World nations. In
addition, studying in these reputed
institutions almost guarantees a job for
the students when they complete their
studies. Moreover, studying in foreign
countries also gives a chance to study
and understand different cultures
which help students to increase their
mental horizon.

Disagree
On the other hand, studying abroad also
has some downsides. Foreign education
costs to people a lot of money, because of
this, many families have to take out all of
their savings or loans to support their
children to go abroad. Furthermore, some
students cannot resist the new
environment, due to this, they either have
to quit their studies or come back to
their respective countries. Also, some
students may lose their focus from their
studies and start gravitating towards
earning more money, which eventually
distract them complete their studies.

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, in the globalized world, studying abroad will
help a students to climb the leader of their career more efficiently, but as we know
that every garden has some weeds, a student must be mature to handle changes
which are connected to this.

The space travel is fantastic these day and they are very fascinate towards its but
there are many environmental problems in our planet we should resolve the
problems or travel space and spend a lot of money.
or
Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by human?

Intro:
It is irrefutable to say that, these days many countries are spending a huge amount of
budget in space exploration. Nations are sending robots and satellites to alien planets
to discover their geographical features. Considering this, there are some people who
advocate that the governments should spend as much money as possible in space
exploration, while others opine this money should be used for some basic needs of
Earth. This essay will put light on both sides of the argument and deliver appropriate
conclusion.
Favour(Do space
research)
To begin, there are few reasons for
continuing to search the outer space.
Firstly, Asteroid mining helps us to fulfill
the needs of various minerals which are
very scarce on our planet. Secondly, there
are some possibilities that we come in
contact with extraterrestrial species
which may be far advance than us in
technology and medicine. For instance, it
may possible that they know the treatment
of AIDS which we do not know presently.
Lastly, as a population of our planet is
increasing at alarming rate, space for
living is becoming lesser, finding an extra
space outside Earth will help us to cater to
this requirement.

Against (Invest on
Earth)
On the other hand, the governments
should spend their budget to support
people of Third World nations. People
of these nations are dying because they
do not have to eat proper diet. For
example, in Africa in a year 2010,
around 45% of children death only
occurred due to malnutrition.
Furthermore, as carbon contents are
increasing in our environment on a daily
basis, administration must use their
resources to find some alternative
fuels which are eco-friendly and help to
save our environment and fossil fuels.

To recapitulate, I pen down saying that, many societal problems could be resolved if
the budget amount is use towards the critical problems of Earth.

In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed. Does a common man suffer from a

groups ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and
examples.
It is conspicuous(clearly visible) that, throughout history, the thinking of a group of
people is impacting the lives of thousands of civilians. Whether it is considered on a
political or social level, a set of decisions of a group explains how a society should
work. I completely agreed that, in the conflict of interest between different countries or
different groups, it is the innocent people who sacrifice their lives.
To begin with, if ones have different ideas and beliefs regarding religion,culture, and
politics than others, it may result in clashes or conflicts. In addition, the situation
becomes more problematic and dangerous when this is between two larger groups
rather than individuals; it refers to as a war of ideas.
First of all, during World War II, a group of countries namely US, UK and China
attacked Japan with explosive atomic bombs destroying the cities of Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, killing more than one lakh civilians. This is a clear example of the decision
laid by a few countries against Japan to surrender to its allies. Though, these
countries achieved victory in their mission but Japanese people are still suffering from
the radioactive radiation effect which resulted in blindness and mental disorders.
Thus, we can say that political ideologies(a system of ideas and ideals) of a group can
drastically harm society.
In addition, September 11 attacks on US by a group of 19 militants, associated with
Islamic extremist group, hijacked four airplanes and killed around 3,000 people by
colliding airplanes into symbolic US landmark. This example clearly shows how the
decision and planning of these terrorist activists took lives of thousands of innocent
people.
To conclude,I restate that conflicts of ideas are inevitable(unavoidable) so individuals
should respect the ideas of others so that this world can be more peaceful and
prosperous.

Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization?

It is irrefutable to say that, these days English is becoming a common language in

every part of the world. It has become an intermediate language between various
countries. Considering this, some people argue that, it will remain a global language,
while other opine it will be replaced by an another language. This essay will give

assertion(opinion) on both sides of the contention(dispute) before deducing

reasonable conclusion.
Agree

Disagree

To begin with, in todays international

business market, English plays a pivotal
role to make the business links with
other international companies. In addition,
this language also provides a sharp edge
to companies in a hard competitive world
to survive. Moreover, English plays a
significant role in technology. This is
because most of the scientist prefer to
write their research papers in English.
For instance, almost all computer
languages like C, C++, Java, and C# are
first written in English language only.
Furthermore, English language helps
students in making their successful
academic career. Students who have a
knowledge of this language can access
information from internet, magazines, and
books which eventually help them to
increase their mentality . Last but not
least, as social networking is
increasing at alarming rate, people who
know English language can easily
communicate with human beings of
foreign land and share information with
them.

On the other hand, with globalization

other languages also trying to grip the
world. For instance, country like China
always promote its mother tongue
chinese and sell its products with chinese
instructions on it. This represents that
they are condemning English language
and promoting their own language. Thus,
in coming years we can say other
languages can overtake English.

To recapitulate, I would like to say that, although lots of languages are emerging in
this world but I believe, English will remain the most preferred language in coming
years.

Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for

public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children
by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which
position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support
your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or
reading.

INTRO:
It is irrefutable to say that, advertising has become an indispensable part of any
corporate businesses. It helps to attract potential customers to expand companys
business. Considering this, many people argue that advertisements should be placed
in schools whereas others opine juvenile mind is certainly not a good idea to promote
commercial business.
AGREE
To begin, advertisements are good source
of funding for the public schools who
always find themselves hard to manage
their financial cash flow. Furthermore,
advertisements targeted to kids such as
toothpaste and shower gel are helpful to
bring awareness to children. For
instance, children may enlighten about the
importance of hygiene and keep
precautions in their mind before eating
something.

DISAGREE
On the other hand, placing
advertisements in schools will distract
juveniles who do not have controlling
power on themselves. School children
might less concentrate on their studies
and more focus on colourful
advertisements because of which their
future will be uncertain as they will not
be able to pass their course easily. For
example, a child who is in the habit of
involving in various advertising
campaigns since childhood, lacks behind
on his or her studies. In the same way,
young pupils will be obsessed with
money and if there is a shortage of
money in any stage of their life while
growing, they might indulge in an
illegal act to achieve money.

Conclude:
To recapitulate, advertisements are efficient and effortless source of money for the
public schools, however, as every garden has some weeds, schools management
must act prudently to monitor continuously students behaviour and choose suitable
advertisements to put inside schools.