Pakistan Academy of Marketing Journal

2016, Vol. 01, No. 1, 1827.

Factors Influencing Individual Investor Behavior: The Case Of The Karachi Stock
Exchange (KSE)
1 Abdul Rauf Kashif, 2 Madiha Afzal &3 Mohsin Younis
1,3 Iqra University Islamabad Campus
2 M.com Student, Allama Iqbal Open University Islamabad Pakistan
Email: kashifrauf365@gmail.com

Abstract
The problem statement for this paper is to identify the impact of expected risk, expected return, and investment experience on
investment behavior. The objective of this study is: To decide the effect of Investment Experience of individual speculator on his
venture choice. To look at the impact of Investment data of individual financial specialist on his venture choice. To Examine the effect
of Risk Perception on the speculation choice of individual speculator. The results show that all hypotheses are accepted with
acceptable significant level.
Key Words: Risk Tolerance, Asset Allocation, Cognitive abilities & Personality

1.

Introduction

Money related masters are absolutely solid and oversee such choices that are, are risk tackling the grounds that they basically need to assemble their wealth
(Neumann and Morgenstern, 1947). According to utility theory solitary examiners select the portfolio that grows their typical utility measured in expected
return while decreases the perils or setbacks. The study on money related speculation does not consider the monetary pro's decisions. Maybe it focuses on
macroeconomic models that extend the mass business part direct (Nagy and Obenberger 1994). On the other hand, in view of the nonattendance of the
information and their investigative limits, the budgetary pros are constrained to be prudent, since beside of the learning they store and experience they have
is all confined. (Hoffmann, Eije, and Jager, 2006). Behavioral cash is a study which has lit up the piece of behavioral parts of endeavor decisions. In
behavioral asset, financial markets are poor down using models which are less tight than those given by Neumann and Morgenstern (1947).
Behavioral cash focuses on how examiners disentangle and grabs the information to take wander decisions. It moreover takes a gander at the theorist conduct
which prompts distinctive business segment irregularities. It is a rapidly creating field which focuses on the behavior of cash related experts cerebrum
research (Merikas, Andreas, George, and Prasad, 2004; Al-Tamimi, 2006). Various examination focuses on have been coordinated on the behavior and
portfolio execution of institutional theorists before (Venter, 2006; Prowse, 1990; Nagy and Obenberger, 1994; Baker and Haslem, 1974). Solitary money
related authorities take an enthusiasm for the offer buying in order to exchange framework and offering unmistakable stocks and it is fundamental to
perceive diverse fiscal and behavioral motivations that impact their purchasing decisions. This study is an attempt to give understanding into the behavior of
individual budgetary experts i.e. which figures sway them to purchase stocks.
To begin with study that was driven in Karachi, Pakistan is about the Pakistani Investor's behavior. It gave an information to individual neighborhood
monetary masters; hypothesis specialists/coordinators and associations recorded in Karachi stock exchange. The understanding of behavioral technique for
theorists is key for organizing cash related endeavors since it will help them to use their frameworks with their clients. The master theory, which oversees
retail client, may unite key parts while tending to individual money related expert concerns. Also, associations can make their future game plans and
frameworks by focusing on these components which attract money related masters and affect them to contribute.

2.

Literature Review

The hypothesis of the individual speculators was initially showed up in 1970. Moreover, Lease, Lewellen, and Schlarbaum (1974) founds that the
demographic qualities, venture system designs, data sources, resource possessions, market states of mind and discernments, of the individual financial
specialist.
In 1974 Haslem found that financial specialists were of two distinct sorts. Speculators who offered significance to profits were more seasoned, females, and
hazard unwilling and did not look for an expansive increment in the estimation of their stock. On the other hand, the second sort worried with capital
thankfulness were willing to give up current profits for future value appreciation.
Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) found that trade cost of securities redirect all straightforwardly open information with the objective that it is hard to
effectively achieve sporadic returns using such information (Winsen, 1976). Winsen (1976) focused on whether the surge of information was joined with the
theorist direct or not. The revelations maintained the conflict that budgetary authorities in a couple firms confound and/or misuse certain uninhibitedly open
data things which realizes their behavior not being an adequate limit of the surge of information coming in the offer exchanging framework. Falk and
Matulich (1976) examined the relationship between some individual characteristics of a get-together of theorists and a social affair of endeavor advocates,
and the level of risk attributed by them to diverse sorts of financial hypotheses.
Bread cook, Hargrove, Haslem (1977) found the relationship in the middle of danger and all out return is certain yet lesser than the relationship in the middle
of danger. It is found diminished by the negative threat benefit relationship. Moreover, benefits and capital appreciation together totals to whole return thusly
the region of a positive threat total returns relationship even after negative risk benefits suggests that the positive relationship amidst peril and expected that
entry shows up would as a result of the impact of capital gratefulness in monetary master goals of total return. Likewise it implies that lower danger
speculators look for high profits while higher danger financial specialists look for higher capital gratefulness in development stocks. Barnwell described
individual speculators as having a place with two extremes-dynamic or aloof in her way of life examination.
Warren, Stevens, and McConkey (1990), found that demographics are being used to utilized to fragment the business sector for money related and monetary
administrations however way of life attributes help in distinguishing individual speculator's budgetary needs all the more exactly. Way of life measurements
additionally helps in separating between the financial specialists ventures, for example, stocks and bonds. The investigation uncovered that those
speculators who has little ventures they for the most part focused on the stocks in securities which can be depicted as volunteers though, those financial
specialists who had overwhelming speculations cannot get included in any group association and agreeing.

Pakistan Academy of Marketing

Pakistan Academy of Marketing Journal

The expanding of age the hazard avoidance additionally diminishes. Moreover later 65 of retirement age, hazard avoidance increments with the expansion of
age (Riley and Chow, 1992). Furthermore, Nagy and Obenberger (1994) focused on the factors that are also included in the individual stock financial
specialist impact furthermore analyzed the riches augmentation criteria which are imperative to the speculators .despite the fact that financial specialists pick
their own particular technique for criteria of stocks.
Al-Tamimi (2006) looked into variables were from the corporate profit, stock attractiveness, government possessions, making of money related markets, and
get rich speedy. The slightest impacting component were confronted in worldwide money related markets. Element examination made 5 components:
impartial data, bookkeeping data, advocate suggestion, mental self-view/firm-picture fortuitous event, and individual budgetary desires. Sevil, Sen, and
Yalama (2007) went for comprehension the choice procedures of little speculators exchanging Istanbul stock trade and found that financial specialists are not
totally levelheaded as saw by customary fund hypotheses.
Numerous analysts have examined the venture conduct and attempted to improve the comprehension of individuals overseeing interests in diverse ways. On
the off chance that we experience the accessible writing, it is primarily individual attributes that impact speculation choice making. The way of mental
variables and people's conduct at the season of speculation choice making is under examination. Different mental elements like convictions, inclinations, and
mental predispositions have been found.
The reason for this study is to decide how the individual venture is influenced by the level of information a financial specialist has about diverse speculation
instrument, learning of the relationship in the middle of danger and return alongside the learning of organization's execution investigation strategy and
portfolio administration systems.
The fundamental explanation behind picking Karachi for exploration is that; Karachi is the development shaft of Pakistan and is a living arrangement of
around one corer populace and around 70 percent of financial specialists. In any case, since most recent four years there has been watched a clear change in
financial specialists' inclinations about speculations, as lawfulness circumstance is basic to pull in any outside and nearby interest in Pakistan all in all and
Karachi specifically. Political and large scale efficient insecurity make speculation environment less helpful for financial specialists and proceed with
deterioration of Pakistani coin has made interest in worldwide exchange less successive. Power and fuel emergencies have made the mechanical execution
hopeless that drive the financial specialists to move to neighboring nation like Bangladesh.
The problem statement for this paper is to identify the impact of expected risk, expected return, and investment experience on investment behavior.
The objective of this study is:

To decide the effect of Investment Experience of individual speculator on his venture choice.

To look at the impact of Investment data of individual financial specialist on his venture choice.

To Examine the effect of Risk Perception on the speculation choice of individual speculator.

2.1. Investment Experience

In the choice making procedure of the speculators, experience is essential. Speculator assesses and buy budgetary items by concentrating on their experience.
Financial specialist's experience gives them the familiarity with danger so they can evaluate chance adequately (Harrison, 2003). Henceforth, speculator
indicated positive criticism in exchanging when their past data is in time arrangement. In any case, logical data avoid from it (Muradoglu, 2002). Along these
lines, financial specialists that had higher experience in regards to their speculation choices contain abnormal state of danger resilience that prompts contain
a high unsafe portfolio. Then again, financial specialists that had lower speculation experience with respect to their venture choices contain low level of
danger resilience that prompts contain less dangerous portfolio (Corter and Yuh-Jia, 2006).
The way in which individuals get information about danger of venture items might influence how well they appreciate hazard and affect the danger they are
willing to acknowledge. The choice making writing recognizes two on a very basic level particular routes in which individuals find out about danger
"portrayal versus experience". Choices from portrayal depend on unequivocally expressed probabilities connected with results. Choices as a matter of fact
depend on examining conceivable results, implying that the hidden probabilities must be judged or surmised taking into account the watched proof (Hadar
and Fox 2009; Hau et.al, 2008). At the point when a tenderfoot financial specialist will settle on a choice of a venture, he might have a larger number of
inclinations than that of master speculator. Subsequently, experienced financial specialist can switch or lessen the choice making predispositions, these
inclinations incorporates overweighting of uncommon occasions as portrayed by prospect hypothesis (Barron and Erev, 2003).
At the point when data about danger is gained through experience, the related probabilities with results are whether obscure or they are unequivocally
expressed. The master speculators must take in either through criticism from past venture choices or through experience examining that is before settling on
a decision individuals must be permitted to test conceivable results. The choice to put resources into the share trading system is not made in view of the
likelihood rather; their instinct about the allure of the share trading system gets from their valuation for how it has performed before. Given indistinguishable
hidden likelihood dispersions, choices in view of portrayal and experience can be generously diverse, especially for choices that include uncommon
occasions. Hertwig, Barron, Weber, and Erev (2004) exhibit that choices in view of numerical depictions of results and their related probabilities vary
essentially from choices in view of experience, in which probabilities are found out through pushing catches to test conceivable results.
In venture choice making, state of mind varieties may to some degree impact the choices concerning resources designation. For instance, on the off chance
that we contrast individuals in an unbiased state of mind and the general population in a decent mind-set is liable to settle on a more idealistic venture choice.
Likewise individuals with a negative state of mind be prone to be extra critical when they evaluate their ventures. Financial specialists' state of mind likewise
influences the decision of choice. Besides, this is valuable for choice making (Lucey and Dowling, 2005). Notwithstanding, individuals, who are sometimes
incite by this foundation, may allow short lived variables, similar to temperament, to impact the autonomous choices. Along these lines, Lucey and Dowling
(2005) found that this strategy is normally connected with extreme choices including vulnerability and hazard.
The past progressive danger taking knowledge lead to generally safe recognition for the future venture Reed and (Storrud-Barnes, 2010). Doran and Wright
(2010) explained the amid venture choices making financial specialists intensely transferring on past speculation experience. At the point when speculators
have fruitful venture experience (exceptional yield and low difference consequently) then they dearth to expand their interest in that specific stock and
predicted future prizes are absolutely connected with the late gotten. The financial specialists are intrigued to reinvest in the stock that give advantage

www.paom.org.pk

Abdul Rauf Kashif, Madiha Afzal & Mohsin Younis

marked down in past as opposed to endure misfortune. Moreover, if the stock is sold and after that its cost diminished in the business sector the financial
specialist feel delight (Odean, Strahilevitz, and Barber, 2004). They report two sorts of practices that are disappointment and delight. The speculator feels
lament on the off chance that he comes to realize that after sold out, stock cost has expanded so they feel selling so as to misgive being less fortunate stocks.
While he feels delight on the off chance that he come to realize that the stock quality declined subsequent to auctioning so he feels better off offering them
rather to hold it. Odean et al., (2004) found that because of restricted intellectual capacity of financial specialists to process data speculators want to
repurchase/reinvest the stock they already sold for benefit instead of misfortune.
Ability in venture builds the inclination to target standards or behavioral viewpoint over the subjective standards. In this way amid speculation choice, there
is distinction in the middle of experienced and gullible financial specialists on the inclinations on strategies. East, Wright, and Vanhuele (2008) proposes that
more experienced speculators depend more on states of mind and saw behavioral control while the less master persons depend on subjective standards.
Besides, the hazardous designations are noticeable in both the experience examining and chance reenactment conditions. Concerning as, danger allotment
will increments, with diminished danger discernment, expanded trust in the hazardous asset, and a lower estimation of the likelihood of a misfortune,
(Kaufmann, Weber, and Haisley, 2012).

2.2. Investment Information

Speculator's choice making conduct additionally relies on upon the data. Consequently, nature of the data likewise affected the choice making, if the data
could without much of a stretch and rapidly assess and prepare then choice making turn out to be relatively simple (Lee, Chungb, and Kang, 2008). However
all speculator assess data diversely as per their positive, negative, successive and consolidated data impact. Financial specialist gave more weight to negative
data when it is give at the same time as opposed to consecutively. In addition, fledgling dealers utilize more psychological inclination as contrast with
educated financial specialists. Consequently, carelessness and good faith are extra types of inclination. In extra, Bondt and Thaler (1985) observed that
people more transfer all alone experience. Consequently, because of this biasness people settled on inappropriate choices with restricted data (Shefrin and
Statman, 1994). In extra carelessness, predisposition, and hopefulness were prompting misfortunes. Henceforth, because of their inclination that they have
extra ability they rate over their own particular appraisal capacity (Kahneman and Riepe, 1998). Financial specialist's choice making likewise affected by the
business sector effectiveness, despite the fact that market is wasteful yet speculator could put resources into it by considering that it is productive, in light of
the fact that time and assets could, oblige (Doran and Wright, 2010). In this manner data accessible on time and contain validness it diminish the danger
observation (Wang, Shi, and Fan, 2006). Besides, financial specialist gives more weight to latest data instead of past data (Bondt and Thaler, 1985).
We examine financial specialists' exchanging conduct, especially their adapting to essential stuns in resource esteem, contingent upon individual contrasts in
the affectability of two fundamental neurophysiological frameworksthe Behavioral Approach System (BAS), the 'main thrust' of human conduct, and the
Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS), its 'slowing mechanism'. We find that distinctions in BAS and BIS affectability influence exchanging both "ordinary"
and stun exchanging situations: under typical exchanging conditions, people with a more delicate BAS are more dynamic merchants, lean toward more
hazardous portfolios, and create higher individual general benefits. (Muehlfeld, Weitzel, and Witteloostuijn, 2013)
Hazard and Return on money related resources intensely hand-off on financial state of the nation, business and particular association. The effect of economy
blast or retreat is not same for every one of the commercial ventures in the economy. For instance, in monetary retreat, sustenance industry does very little
endure as contrast with development industry. Monetary blast/subsidence data helps in determination of specific money related resources accessible in the
business sector. In financial blast speculator makes dangerous venture (okay observation) and requests significant yields. While in subsidence financial
specialists are hesitant to contribute cash in light of the fact that they feel it more dangerous while the arrival is low. Data about organization, industry, and
economy is not an end itself the examination give valuable learning out of data. Data can be valuable just when the wellspring of beginning is real and
handling of data is simple (Wang, Shi, and Fan, 2006; Lee, Chungb, and Kang, 2008). Data significance additionally relies on upon speculator's perspective
about business sector. On the off chance that financial specialist trusts that market is exceedingly effective they exchange inactively. There is no need of data
handling on the grounds that market itself mirror the all data accessible and conform costs in like manner. Considers demonstrated that market is less
effective and financial specialist process data to acquire above normal returns or attempt to beat the business sector (Doran and Wright, 2010). In this way,
we can say that data assumes a crucial part in evaluating the danger discernment and return desire

2.3. Risk Perception

Hazard observation implies how much a financial specialist knows from the danger, and the familiarity with danger improve through the investigation of
data that is accessible. Besides (Jordan and Kaas, 2002), discovered distinctive sorts of danger, it included drawback hazard, upside hazard, instability,
equivocalness. Subsequently, in any monetary choice financial specialist assess all part of dangers. Henceforth, all financial specialist carry on in an
unexpected way.
The evaluation of the measure of danger ordinarily includes an impression of the circumstance, which implies that there is some comprehension of the goal
reality. In any case, discernment is a procedure that portrays approaches to interface with the venture environment in which speculator settles on choice.
Collaboration generally comprises of data with respect to money related business sector or investigator sentiments. Moreover, Simon (1986) depicts that
there is not every one of the financial specialists have the same maturity level, mental level to prepare the data accessible to them. Moreover, because of
constrained preparing capacity speculators use heuristics (accessibility, representativeness, tying down, fortification learning and so on) to disentangle the
intricate venture choices (Kahneman and Tversky, 1979, 1998). Besides, chance recognition is additionally affected by how the data is offered which is
called surrounding impact.
Speculators take choices considering saw as opposed to real hazard like standard deviation or beta. Henceforth, Alderfer and Harold Bierman, (1970) it is
depicted that the view of danger is not an part of specialized danger figuring, beta, the standard deviation, or fluctuation rather it is an instinctive idea of
danger is likelihood of misfortune.It has been all around reported that the identical investor is willing to take distinctive measures of danger in diverse
connections, e.g. physical dangers versus money related dangers.

Pakistan Academy of Marketing Journal

2.4. Investment Decision

To examine changes in risky choice, risk perception, and risk preference as the function of prior task success or failure, a decision environment is required
that allows for repeated decision making and has a set of choice alternatives that is sufficiently large to manipulate objective risk characteristics. Choice
alternatives should be described on several dimensions that can be requested at wish, to make the task realistic and interesting as well as providing for a way
to test our hypotheses about changes in information acquisition and processing style as a function of outcome feedback. Finally, the out- comes of the
decisions need to be manipulate able to result in a "success" or "failure" series without giving the impression that they are rigged. The decision environment
selected as satisfying these requirements was a personal-computer based financial investment task. Participants were told that they were piloting a new stock
market simulation program and filled out an evaluation questionnaire about the simulation software at the end of the experiment. The cover story asked them
to come to two investment sessions on different days, so that they would have enough experience with the simulation to evaluate it. At the beginning of each
session, investors were provided with an endowment of funds. For each of several investment periods within a session, their task was to choose be- tween six
investment alternatives. Standard financial performance information about each stock could be obtained on request, one dimension at a time.
When investors indicated that they had sufficient information about all alternatives that they wished to consider, they were asked to invest all or some of
their current assets (endowment plus previous wins minus previous losses) into one stock alternative. The computer program kept track of their information
acquisition (i.e., the type and sequence of their information selections) and their final investment selections. Participants received information about the
performance of their selected stock and the other (non-selected) stocks at the end of the current investment period, before making another investment
decision for the next investment period. In the "success" session, feedback over the set of ten investment periods was largely positive for the selected stock
and negative for non-selected stocks; feedback over the set of ten investment periods during the "failure" session was the opposite. Investors took part in
both sessions of the simulation so that the effect of success and failure could be assessed within-subjects, with the order of sessions counterbalanced.
As mentioned earlier, we selected the prior out- come history manipulation for its documented effects on choice. Differences in choice between the two
sessions were necessary to test our hypotheses about the root of such changes in either risk perception and/or risk preference. Some difference between the
stock se- lection in the two sessions could be expected as the result of objective differences in recent stock performance that were the unavoidable byproduct of our success vs. failure manipulation. In addition however, there is a sizable literature on the overreaction of investors in financial markets (e.g.,
DeBondt and Thaler 1990, M. Weber and Camerer 1992) which predicted that we should see even larger differences in stock choices than were objectively
justifiable.
As also discussed above, one of the main hypotheses of this paper are those situational variables affect risk perception rather than inherent risk preference.
In Experiment 1, risk perception was found to be different for risky prospects with positive outcomes than for the equivalent risky prospects with negative
outcomes. In this experiment, we hypothesized that the manipulation of prior outcome history, another situational variable, would also affect risk perception.
Based on the results of Experiment 1 and Weber & Bottom (1989), we hypothesized that the perceived risk attitude of a given investor would be the same in
the two sessions, i.e., that risk preference as a stable personality trait would not be affected by prior outcome history.

Conceptual Framework/ Model

Investment
Experience
H1
Investment
Information

H2

Investment
Decision

H3
Risk
Perception

Hypotheses

3.

H1 Investment experience has been significant on stock Market

H2 Investment information has been significant on stock Market
H3 Risk perception has been significant on stock Market

Research Methodology

This part clarifies the systems or steps that would be utilized to inspect the relationship between the concerned variables. It talks about the populace and test,
measures and instrument and strategies.

3.1. Population
The principal securities exchange in Pakistan was built up in 1947 and later on, different markets were created in 1974 and 1997. An assortment of money
related securities exchanged these business sectors that incorporates conventional and favored shares, redeemable, prospects, and corporate securities. A
standout amongst the most widely recognized exchanging is the exchanging of conventional shares. Speculators with diverse individual portfolios offer and
purchase these monetary items keeping in mind the end goal to acquire a benefit. This postulation plans to break down the conduct of financial specialists

www.paom.org.pk

Abdul Rauf Kashif, Madiha Afzal & Mohsin Younis

when they are settling on choices about speculations particularly those ventures, which include high hazard. This study is attempted in the nation, Pakistan
and tries to inspect the financial specialist's conduct as indicated by the created hypothetical system. With this point of view, every one of the financial
specialists of Pakistan go under the number of inhabitants in this study.

3.2. Population bifurcation

Financial specialists exchanging the securities exchanges are not all same. These are further sorted into two classifications; singular financial specialists and
institutional (corporate) speculators. The attributes of individual financial specialists are not the same as those of institutional. Institutional financial
specialists are for the most part benefits arranges, establishments and so on. Shapira and Venezia (2001) found that individual speculators don't exchange
intermittently because of the different elements. Subsequently, the exchanging conduct of individual financial specialist is not at all like the corporate
speculators (Covat et al., 2005). The center of this study is on the conduct of individual financial specialists of Pakistan.

3.3. Sample
Not all the individual investors are trading in similar financial products. Individual investors are dealing in a variety of products, which are trading in the
stock exchange markets. Sample attempts to represent the target sample of the study. The target sample of the current study is the investors of Islamabad
who are dealing in stocks of the firms, futures, and mutual funds as well. Purchasing of stocks means to buy the shares of the specific firm and buying of
mutual fund means to buy the group of stocks and bonds of different companies. Investors having experience of purchasing these risky securities are the
target sample (Tseng & Yang, 2011). As the investors of Islamabad city, do not have the predetermined chance to be selected as the subjects so the nonprobability sampling design would be used in this thesis. Particularly, in non-probability sampling, the convenience sampling technique would be used.
Convenience sampling approach provides the facility to select those elements of the population, which are conveniently available and accessible. The
investors of Islamabad city are the convenient elements of the population.

3.4. Sampling Techniques

As we realize that the specimen considered to speak to the objective example of the study. Moreover, at whatever point a little size of populace which speaks
to the entire populace and demonstrates the photo of the entire specimen is known as testing edge (Alan Bryman, 2007). In this way, the specimen of
populace has been picked when a bunch of persons or units in a populace are chosen to contribute in a study (Alan Bryman, 2007). The comfort examining
procedure is utilized for this study. Thus speculators from Islamabad and ISE financial specialists are considered as target test. Since it is similarly simple to
approach the Islamabad city financial specialists than that of Lahore and Karachi urban areas speculators that is the reason it is called comfort testing or nonlikelihood inspecting. This kind of inspecting permits every single member to contribute proportional to research process.

3.5. Sample Size

The example size was 300 respondents which imply that 300 polls were appropriated among the Islamabad Stock Exchange (ISE) financial specialists,
administration science understudies and some different speculators.

4.

Instruments and Measures

4.1. Instruments
With the motivation behind appraisal of individual financial specialists' practices and states of mind in term of choice making amid a dangerous prospect,
overview instrument was produced from the writing. The poll is recovered from the writing of two studies (Chou, Huang, and Hsu, 2010 and Byrne, 2005),
which can be isolated into two fundamental parts. The main piece of that poll is with respect to demographic data while the second a portion of the survey
has the inquiries regarding to diverse free variables of the concentrate, for example, hazard discernment, venture data, past speculation experience, and the
dependent variable expected return. The poll measured on a five point liker scale.
The study began with a short guideline of what to think about and how the overview functioned was produced to direct the respondents while noting the
review. These money related included both securities exchange financial specialists (ISE) and, business and Administration College understudies, who have
enough learning about venture. The report was created all together that the respondents utilized a 5-guide Likert-scale toward react forty-nine things about
distinctive traits.

4.2. Measures
4.2.1.

Risk Perception

The danger recognition is the means by which consider danger which shows the level of danger you are feeling amid an occasion in your own particular
subjective inclination. Sitkin and Weingart (1995), states that hazard affinity and observation are the go between in danger practices of vulnerability choice
making.
The people encouraged to pick one of five most suitable choices as indicated by their characteristics (Alan Bryman, 2007).Furthermore, 1-5 number qualities
were utilized as a part of that scale where "1" signified, "exceptionally unsafe", 2 implied, " moderate dangerous", 3 implied, " Don't Know", 4 implied "
Low Risk, and 5 implied, " Risk Free".

4.2.2.

Investment Information

Data segment evaluated the weight financial specialist provided for the data about risk among speculation choice and the degree. This area included 6 things
which are scaled as, 1 signified, "Exceedingly Important", while 5 signified, "Un-critical".

4.2.3.

Investment Behaviors

Venture practices comprise on three things and coded as, "1= Increase Investment", "2= Status Quo", "3= Neither Increase nor Decrease", 4= Decrease
Investment, "5= Withdraw Investment.

4.2.4.

Investment Experience

Speculation Experience comprise on three things. Reactions are coded as, "1=Very Successful", "2= Successful", "3= Neither fruitful nor unsuccessful", 4=
unsuccessful, "5= Completely unsuccessful".

4.2.5.

Data Collection

The present proposition depends on essential information gathering from the individual speculators. Information would gather from the individual financial
specialists by utilizing a survey. Singular speculators would be chosen in view of their involvement in purchasing hazardous ventures including stocks,

Pakistan Academy of Marketing Journal

common assets, and prospects. Experienced speculators would more likely to comprehend the survey and finish precisely and it has been obvious from the
pilot study led by Tseng and Yang (2011). Surveys would circulate among speculators through email. A percentage of the polls would manage through direct
association with the financial specialists in the event that where speculators need help to comprehend the survey.

4.2.6.

Procedures

The overview instrument (poll) would by and by disperse among 395 individual financial specialists of Islamabad who are as of now exchanging Islamabad
Stock Exchange, ISE. The concerned financial specialists would recognize through the individual gatherings with speculators, by their own profile of
experience and through reference. Every one of the inquiries would portray to the financial specialists before giving them polls so they could without much
of a stretch see everything and fill likewise. The present study would utilize the unwavering quality, variability, and component examination of the
instruments created. Test of this study would breaking point to the main financial specialists of Islamabad. In this way, the helpful examining methodology
would be utilized. In the wake of gathering the reaction of financial specialists, measurable tests would apply to break down the relationship between free
(counsel looking for data, computerized data, heuristics and hazard avoidance) and ward variable (hazardous choice making conduct) regarding the directing
variable (pay).

4.2.7.

Pilot Testing

Pilot testing is the appraisal in little scale before directing the real overview. It perceives the challenges, which might happen amid the estimation and
examination of dependability and legitimacy of the survey. The specimen populace of this study is the individual financial specialists of Islamabad city who
bargains in stocks, fates, and shared assets. Out of the aggregate surveys, just some of them would dispense for minimal number of concerned financial
specialists to finish the polls for pilot testing.

4.2.8.

Reliability Analysis

Unwavering quality investigation would use to ensure that the size of instrument is always measuring the builds of the survey. The consistency exists
between the different estimations of a variable (Hair et al., 1998) to the degree is the unwavering quality of instrument. It mirrors the consistency in the
discoveries of the study. The most recognized measure of dependability is the inside consistency of the scale. It is gained by the utilization of Cronbach's
alpha. The estimations of Cronbach alpha reaches from zero to 1. On the off chance that the estimation of Cronbach alpha coefficient is more like 1.0 then it
demonstrates the more prominent interior dependability of the things of the scale. The instrument of this study has adjusted from the writing and the
unwavering quality of the things of survey was tried before by utilizing the comparable information accumulation method with 55 financial specialists of
Taiwan. Out of 55 instruments, seven were repetitive on account of the unpracticed speculators. The estimations of Cronbach alpha were worthy (Nunnally
and Bernstein, 1994) with the most extreme quality being computerized data seek at any rate quality being immediate speculation slant at 0.729 (Tseng and
Yang, 2011). These unwavering quality investigation results have taken from the study directed in Taiwan. This dependability examination would do again
in the connection of Pakistan on the grounds that the estimations of Cronbach alpha may fluctuate in Pakistan. After these examinations, factual devices
would apply to decide the relationship among variables.

5.

Results And Discussions

5.1. Reliability
The dependability of estimation scale, Cronbach's Alpha, was utilized as a part of this study and the unwavering quality aftereffect of aggregate scale was
0.653. Along these lines the scale utilized as a part of this study was viewed as worthy. The unwavering quality was likewise checked of every variable
independently as well, and these were gone from 0.695 to 0.805 and henceforth these reliabilities are additionally satisfactory.
To start with variable danger inclination having absolute six things and demonstrated the Cronbach's Alpha 0.805. Second variable named hazard recognition
have two measurements, Information nature and data controllability. Every measurement has five things each demonstrated Cronbach's Alpha qualities 0.729
and 0.736 separately. Third variable return desire having four things had Cronbach's Alpha worth 0.732. Fourth variable data message or hopeful cynical
data has three measurements which are data significance (6 things), data fulfillment (4 things) and asymmetry data (7 things). These measurements
demonstrated Cronbach's Alpha qualities 0.797, 0.695 and 0.773 individually. Fifth variable was speculation conduct comprises of two variables, venture
execution (3 things) and reinvestment goal (3 things) demonstrated Cronbach's Alpha qualities 0.737 and 0.724 separately. In this manner, these outcomes
confirm interior consistency among things of every variable (Field, 2006). Henceforth, the review poll is dependable for analyzing.

5.2. Regression Analysis

Variables are tried through relapse investigation on an individual premise rather than entire model fit. SPSS 17.0 windows variant was utilized to run the
investigations. The outcomes show positive or negative critical connections between free variable (s) and dependent variable (s). Besides, a few results
uncover immaterial connections between autonomous variable (s) and dependent variable (s).
A few results are huge (sig<.05) which acknowledge the speculation while others are immaterial (sig>.05) and they dismiss the theories. Then, some huge
results show positive relationship (positive beta) between variables whiles other show negative relationship (negative beta) between the variables. In this
way, we test the theory through relapse investigation.
The coefficient of determination (R2) is utilized in the system of measurable models. The fundamental motivation behind R2 is the conjecture of up and
coming results on the premise of other interrelated data. The coefficient of determination is regularly seen as a number somewhere around 0 and 1.0. These
qualities clarify how well a relapse line fits an arrangement of information. Moreover, when the estimation of R2 close to 1.0 demonstrates that a relapse line
fits the information well. While a R2 closer to 0 demonstrates a relapse line does not fit the figures exceptionally well. It is the rate of variability in an
information set that is considered by the measurable model (Steel, 1960).
H1: Investment Experience has positive noteworthy effect on Investment Decision.
Venture encounter additionally demonstrates the huge association with Investment Decision having coefficient of relapse 0.019, significance level .022, beta
is - 0.138 and t-quality is - 2.299. variables are tried through relapse investigation on an individual premise rather than entire model fit. SPSS 17.0 windows
variant was utilized to run the investigations. The outcomes show positive or negative critical connections between free variable (s) and dependent variable
(s). Besides, a few results uncover immaterial connections between autonomous variable (s) and dependent variable (s). The significance level confirms the
significant impact of investment experience on investment decision.

www.paom.org.pk

Abdul Rauf Kashif, Madiha Afzal & Mohsin Younis

A few results are huge (sig<.05) which acknowledge the speculation while others are immaterial (sig>.05) and they dismiss the theories. Then, some huge
results show positive relationship (positive beta) between variables whiles other show negative relationship (negative beta) between the variables. In this
way, we test the theory through relapse investigation.
The coefficient of determination (R2) is utilized in the system of measurable models. The fundamental motivation behind R2 is the conjecture of up and
coming results on the premise of other interrelated data. The coefficient of determination is regularly seen as a number somewhere around 0 and 1.0. These
qualities clarify how well a relapse line fits an arrangement of information. Moreover, when the estimation of R2 close to 1.0 demonstrates that a relapse line
fits the information well. While a R2 closer to 0 demonstrates a relapse line does not fit the figures exceptionally well. It is the rate of variability in an
information set that is considered by the measurable model (Steel, 1960).
Investment experience additionally demonstrates the huge association with Investment Decision having coefficient of relapse 0.019, essentialness level .022,
and beta is - 0.138 and t-quality is - 2.299.
H2: Investment Information has critical effect on Investment Decision. (Acknowledged)
Speculation Information affect fundamentally on Investment Decision with coefficients of relapse 0 .068. This demonstrates 6.8 % variety in the Investment
Decision can be clarified by variety in Investment Information, while some other variable are reasons for remaining change. The significant level is .000,
beta is .183. The outcomes show beta of 0.183 between Investment Information and Investment Behavior which implies a positive relationship between them.
Hypothesis is accepted because significant level is less than 0.05.
H3: Risk Perception has huge effect on Investment Decision.
Hazard Perception demonstrates the huge association with Investment Decision having coefficient of relapse 0.028, centrality level .006, and beta is - 0.257.
The Investment Decision can be change by 2.8% with the adjustment in Risk Perception.

6.

Conclusion

In this report elements affecting the individual speculator's conduct were inspected. Quantitative examination was led to decide the relationship between
fancied logical and reaction variables. There were five free variables including; monetary proficiency, high experience, utilization of book keeping data,
significance of breaking down budgetary explanations and age that may influence the speculation choice of any person. Five distinctive ward variables were
browsed the poll to reach to any conclusion they were; danger taking, inclination interest in shares (unsafe speculation), hazard avoidance, data asymmetry
and offers speculation. The acquired result for speculation 1,( that says that monetary education and hazard taking are in positive connection), demonstrates
that as the money related education of a man builds his danger taking capacity increments, as investigating money related articulations pieces of information
the financial specialists which organization can give better capital addition. However speculation identified with experience and penchant to hazard says that
they are in backwards connection that is as speculators' experience will expand he will put resources into less unsafe instruments; they may altered stores or
high pay profit stocks. Concentrate additionally demonstrates factually that bookkeeping data and hazard avoidance are in direct relationship, that is
alongside experience as individual's bookkeeping data builds he wants to put resources into less hazardous ventures, it might be financial specialist
acknowledges to get lower yet is not prepared to endure colossal misfortune. Normally seniority individuals on the other hand the resigned individuals are
found with this idea. Overview insights demonstrate high reaction who say that data asymmetry prompts unfavorable choice of ventures. To conquer this
issue theory was tried whose outcomes say that data asymmetry can be lower by breaking down more money related explanations. The more and subtle
element speculator will ponder the monetary proclamations of the fancied organization better will be his speculation choice. Investigation of connection in
the middle of age and inclination interest in shares demonstrates that both are in positive connection however not culminate positive. As the age of a
financial specialist builds he might want to put resources into shares yet it's redundant that he put resources into shares with the intension of getting the
capital increase, as expressed over that old subjects are danger disinclined so they can picked stocks as their inclination ventures due to high profit payout.
At last it was reasoned that monetary proficiency and bookkeeping data helps financial specialists in bringing down data asymmetry and permits financial
specialists to put resources into dangerous instruments. In any case, as age and encounter increment financial specialists inclination changes to less
hazardous speculations, it doesn't imply that speculator does not like to put resources into offers, he will however with the intension of getting profit return
instead of capital increase.
Recommendations
The significant data about any choices taken by the administrative bodies must be given the pertinent data to speculators and different partners.
Administrative body must counsel with other admonitory boards of trustees of intrigued parties, similar to stock trades, council of business and industry
while making any changes. The significant data of securities and review reports of each organization be kept with the goal that straightforwardness might
exist in the business sector. Administrative bodies ought to find a way to elevate shared asset speculation to settle the business sector for long run. Most
critical however not the minimum is that Government of Pakistan ought to pay its full consideration regarding settle the business sector as outside direct
speculation to a great extent reliant on it.

References
1.

Ajzen. (1985). From intentions to actions; A theory of planned behaviors. 11-39.

2.
3.
4.

Alan Bryman, E. B. (2007). Business Research Methods. In E. B. Alan Bryman, Business Research Methods (p. 786). Oxford University Press.
Alderfer, C. P., & Harold Bierman, J. (1970). Choices with Risk: Beyond the Mean and Variance. Journal of Business, 341353.
Alleyne, P., & Broome, T. (. (2010). An exploratory study of factors influencing investment decisions Paper presented at the Central Bank of
Barbados.
Althaus, C. E. (2005). A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk. Risk Analysis 25, 567588.

5.

Pakistan Academy of Marketing Journal

6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.

25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.

Arrow, K. (1970). Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing.

Barron, G., & Erev, I. (2003). Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. Journal of
Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 215-233.
Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. H. (1999). Risk Aversion or Myopia? Choices in Repeated Gambles and Retirement Investments. Management Science,
45(3), 364381.
Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992, Oct). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades.
Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992 1026.
Blais, A.-R., & Webber, E. U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations. Judgment and Decision
Making, 3347.
Bondt, W. F., & Thaler, R. (1985). 24. . M. W., & Thaler H.R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact. The Journal of Finance, 11(3), 793-807.
Bondt, W. P. (1993). Betting on trends: Intuitive forecasts of financial risk and return. International Journal of Forecasting, 9(3), 355371.
Bromiley, P., & Curley, S. P. (1992). Individual Differences in Risk Taking. Yates, J. Frank (Ed), (1992). Risk-taking behavior.Wiley series in
human performance and cognition, 87132.
Busenits, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in
strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing.
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between Entrepreneursv and Managers in Large Organizations: Biases and Heuristics in
Strategic Decision-Making. Journal of BusinessVenturing, 930.
Busenitz, L. W., & Barney, J. B. (1997). Differences between Entrepreneursv and Managers in Large Organizations: Biases and Heuristics in
Strategic Decision-Making, :. Journal of BusinessVenturing, 12, 930.
Byrne, K. (2005). How do consumers evaluate risk in financial products. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 10(1), 21-36.
Byrne, K. (2005). How do consumers evaluate risk in financial products. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 10(1), 21-36.
Byrne, K. (2005). How do consumers evaluate risk in financial products. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 10(1), 21-36.
Byrne, K. (2005). How do consumers evaluate risk in financial products? Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 10(1), 21-36.
Byrne, K. (2005). How do consumers evaluate risk in financial products? Journal of Financial Services Marketing,, 10(1), 21-36.
Chen, H., & Volpe, R. P. (1998). An Analysis of Personal Financial Literacy among College Students. Financial Services Review, 7(2), 107-128.
Chen, H., & Volpe, R. P. (1998). An Analysis of Personal Financial Literacy among College Students. Financial Services Review, 7 (2), 107128.Chen, S.-H., & Chun-h. (n.d.).
Chen, S.-H., & Tsai, c.-H. (2011). Investment Preference, Risk Perception, and Portfolio Choices under Different Socio-Economic Status: Some
Experimental Evidences from Individual Investors. Nanhua University - Institute of Financial Management . Chiayi 622, Taiwan: Nanhua
University - Institute of Financial Management.
Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2007). Reinforcement Learning and Savings Behavior. Journal of Finance, 64(6), 2515
2534.
Chou, S.-R., Huang, G.-L., & Hsu, a. H.-L. (2010). Investor Attitudes and Behavior towards Inherent Risk and Potential Returns in Financial
Products. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics(44), 1450-2887.
Chou, S.-R., Huang, G.-L., & Hsu, H.-L. (2010). Investor Attitudes and Behavior towards Inherent Risk and Potential Returns in Financial
Products. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 44, 1450-2887.
Cohn, R. A., Lewellen, W. G., Lease, R. C., & Schlarbum, G. G. (1975). Individual Investor Risk Aversion and investment Portfolio
Composition. Journal of Finance, 20(3), 605-620.
Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1988). 14. Cooper, A., Woo, C., and Dunkelberg, W., (). Entrepreneurs Perceived Chances for Success. Journal of
Business Venturing, 3(2), 97108.
Corter, J. E., & Yuh-Jia, C. (2006). Do Investment Risk Tolerance Attitudes Predict Portfolio Risk. Journal of Business & Psychology, 20(3),
369-381.
dake, K. (1991). Myths and Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 2137.
Davey, G. (2000). Risk tolerance, risk profiling and the financial planning process, ProQuest,.
Dean, W. R., & Thompson, P. B. (1996). The Varieties of Risk, University of Alberta.
Diacon, S., & Hasseldine, J. (2005). Framing Effects and Risk Perception: The Effect of Prior Performance Presentation Format on Investment
Fund Choice.
Dominits, J., & Manski, C. F. (2011). Measuring and Interpreting Expectations of Equity Returns. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 26(3), 35270.
Doran, & Wright, D. R. (2010). Confidence, opinions of market efficiency, and investment behavior of finance professors. 13(1), 174-195.
Doran, J. S., R.Peterson, D., & Wright, C. (2010). Confidence, Opinions of market efficiency, and investment behavior of finance professors.
Journal of Financial market, 13(1), 174-195.
Droms, W. G., & Steven N. Strauss. (2003). Assessing Risk Tolerance for Asset Allocation. Journal of Financial Planning, 16(3), 72-77.
Du, N., & Budescu, D. V. (2005). The Effects of Imprecise Probabilities and Outcomes in Evaluating Investment Options. Management Science,
51(12), 1791-1803.
East, R. (1993). Investment Decisions and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14(2), 337-375.
East, R., Wright, M., & Vanhuele, M. (2008). Consumer Behavior: Applications in Marketing.
Eekhoudt, L., Gollier, C., & Schlesinger, H. (1996). Changes in BackgroundRisk and Risk Taking Behavior. Econometrica, 64(3), 683689.
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Market: A review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 383-417.
Fellner, G., & Maciejovsky, B. (2007). Risk Attitude and Market Behavior: Evidence from Experimental Asset Markets. Journal of Economic
Psychology, 28(3), 338-350.
Fishbein, M. &. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading. Retrieved from
http://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
Galbraith, J. (1993). A Short History of Financial Euphoria. New York: Whittle Books in association with Viking.
Ganzach, Y. (2000). Judging Risk and Return of Financial Assets. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(3), 353-370.
Ganzach, Y., Ellis, S., Pazy, A., & Ricci-Siag, T. (2008). On the perception and operationalization of risk perception. Judgment and Decision
Making, 3(4), 317324.
Gerrans, P., Faff, R. W., & Harnett, N. (2012). Individual Financial Risk Tolerance and the Global Financial Crisis. SSRN.
Gollier, C. (2000). What Does the Classical Theory Have to Say About Portfolio Choice? In Household Portfolios, .
Grable, J. E., & Lytton, R. H. (1999). Assessing Financial Risk Tolerance: Do Demographic. Socioeconomic and Attitudinal Factors Work.
Journal of the FRHD/FERM, Divisions of AAFCS.
Gregory, C. (2004). Modern Portfolio theory and Behavioral Finance. The Journal of Wealth Management, 16-22.

www.paom.org.pk

Abdul Rauf Kashif, Madiha Afzal & Mohsin Younis

53. Guiso, L., Jappelli, T., & Terlizzese, D. (1996). Income risk, borrowing constraints and portfolio choice. American Economic Review, 86(1),
158-172.
54. Gustave, l. B. (1896). The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind. London.
55. Hadar, L., & Fox, C. R. (2009). Information asymmetry in decision from description versus decision from experience. Judgment and Decision
Making, 4(4), 317-325.
56. Haliassos, M., & Bertaut, C. C. (1995). Why do so few hold stocks. Economic Journa, 1110-1129.
57. Hammad, J. D., Houston, D. B., & Melander, E. R. (1967). Determinants of household life insurance premium expenditures: An empirical
investigation. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 64, 397-408.
58. Harrison, T. (2003). Understanding the behavior of financial services consumers: A research agenda. Journal of Financial Services Marketing,
8(1), 6-9.
59. Hartog, J., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Jonker, N. (2002). Linking measured risk aversion to individual characteristics. Kykolos, 55(1), 3-26.
60. Hau, R., Pleskac, T. J., Kiefer, J., & Hertwig, R. (2008). The description-experience gap in risky choice: the role of sample size and experienced
probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(5), 493- 518.
61. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions From Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice.
62. J, M. R., G, D., & J, G. (2005). Insights on Measuring Risk Tolerance from Psychology and Psychometrics Journal of Financial Planning. 18(4),
68-76.
63. Jacobs, B. I., & Levy, K. N. (1996). Residual Risk. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 22(3), 10-16.
64. Jordan, J., & Kaas, K. P. (2002). Advertising in the mutual fund business: The role of judgmental heuristics in private investors evaluation of
risk and return. Journal of financial Services Marketing, 7(2), 129-40.
65. Kahneman, A. T. (1974, Sep 27). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. J store , Vol. 185(4157), 1124-1131. Retrieved from
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-8075%2819740927%293%3A185%3A4157%3C1124%3AJUUHAB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M
66. Kahneman, D., & Riepe, M. W. (1998). Aspects of investor psychology. Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 52-65.
67. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory, An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263292.
68. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk,. Econometrica, 47(2), 263292.
69. Kaufmann, C., Weber, M., & Haisley, E. C. (2012). The Role of Experience Sampling and Graphical Displays on one's Investment Risk Appetite
and Comprehension. SSRN eLibrary.
70. Kaustia, M., & upfer, S. K. (2008). Do investors overweight personal experience. Evidence from IPO subscriptions. Journal of Finance, 63(6),
26792702.
71. Kimball, M. S. (1993). Standard Risk Aversion. Econometrica, 61(3), 589611.
72. Klos, A., Weber, E. U., & Weber, M. (2005). Investment Decisions and Time Horizon: Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Repeated Gambles.
Management Science, 51, 1777 1790.
73. Kuhn, K. M., & Budescu, D. V. (1996). The Relative Importance of Probabilities, Outcomes and Vagueness in Hazard Risks Decisions.
Organisation Behaviour Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 301-317.
74. Lee, K. C., Chungb, N., & Kang, I. (2008). Understanding individual investor's behavior with financial information disclosed on the web sites.
27(3), 219-227.
75. Leea, K. C., Chungb, N., & Kang, I. (2008). Understanding individual investor's behavior with financial information disclosed on the web sites.
27(1), 219-227.
76. Leon Fistinger, S. H. (1956). When Prophecy Fails. University of minnesota press.
77. Levy, B. I. (1996). Residual Risk. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 22(3), 10-16.
78. Loewenstein, G. (2000). Emotions in Economic Theory and Economic Behavior. The American Economic Review, 90(2), 426-432.
79. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as Feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286.
80. Lucey, B. M., & Dowling, M. (2005). The Role of Feelings in Investor Decision Making. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(2), 211-237.
81. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2006). Financial Literacy and Retirement Preparedness: Evidence and Implications for Financial Education
Programs.
82. Malkiel, B. G. (2003). The efficient market hypothesis and its critics. TheJournal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 5982.
83. Malmendier, U., & Nagel, S. (2007). Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk-Taking?
84. Muehlfeld, K., Weitzel, U., & Witteloostuijn, A. v. (2013). Fight or freeze? Individual differences in investors motivational systems and trading
in experimental asset markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 195-209.
85. Muradoglu, G. (2002). Portfolio managers and novices forecasts of risk and return. Are there predictable forecast errors. Journal of Forecasting,
6(21), 395416.
86. Muradoglu, G. (n.d.). Portfolio managers and novices forecasts of risk and return. Are there predictable forecast errors. Journal of Forecasting,
21(6), 395416.
87. Muradoglu, G., Salih, A., & Mercan, M. (2005). A Behavioral Approach to Efficient Portfolio Formation. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(4),
202-212.
88. Odean, T., Strahilevitz, M., & Barber, B. M. (2004). Once burned, twice shy: How nave learning and counterfactuals affect the repurchase of
stocks previously sold.
89. Olsen, R. A. (1997). Investment risk: The experts perspective. Financial Analysis Journal, 53(2), 6266.
90. Oppe, S. (1988). The Concept of Risk: A Decision Theoretic Approach. Ergonomics 31, 435440.
91. P.Alderfer, C., & Bierman, H. (1970). Choices with Risk: Beyond the Mean and Variance. Journal of Business, 341353.
92. Palich, L. E., & Bagby, D. R. (1995). Using Cognitive Theory to Explain Entrepreneurial Risk-Taking. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 425438.
93. Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large. Econometrica, 32(1-2), 122.
94. Pratt, J. W., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (1987). Proper Risk Aversion. Econometrica, 55(1), 143154.
95. Quattlebaum, O. M. (1988). Loss aversion: The key to determining individual risk. The Journal of Financial Planning, 1(1), 66.
96. Reed, R., & Storrud-Barnes, S. F. (2010). Uncertainty, risk, and real options: who wins, who loses. Management Decision, 48(7), 1080-1089.
97. Ricciardi, v., & Simon, H. K. (2000). What is Behavioral Finance. Business, Education and Technology Journal, 2(2), 1-9.
98. Ritter, J. R. (2003). Behavior Finance. Pacific-Basin Finance Journa, 11(4), 429-437.
99. Ronay, R., & Kim, D.-Y. (2006). Gender differences in explicit and implicit risk attitudes. A socially facilitated phenomenon. British Journal of
Social Psychology, 45(2), 397-419.

Pakistan Academy of Marketing Journal

100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.

Selden, G. C. (1912). Psychology of the Stock Market: Human Impulses Lead To Speculative Disasters.
Sewell, M. (2001). Behavioural Finance.
Shefrin, H., & Statman, M. (1994). Behavioral Capital Asset Pricing Theory. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29(3), 323-349.
Shiller, R. J. (1999). human behavior and the effeciency of finincial system. 1c, 1305-1334.
Sitkin, S. B., & Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9-39.
Sitkin, S. B., & Weingart, L. R. (1995). Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and
propensity. Academy of ManagementJourna, 38(6), 1573-1582.
Statman, M. (2004). Normal Investors, Then and Now.
Statman, M. (2005). Normal Investors Then and Now. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(3), 31-37.
Statman, M. (2005). Normal Investors Then and Now. Financial Analysts Journal, 61 (3), 31-37.
Steel, R. G. ( 1960). Principles and Procedures of Statistics. . the journal of nuitrition, 187-287.
Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39-60.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series, 83(4157). 185(4157), 1124-1131.
Tversky, D. K. (1973, July). ON THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PREDICTION. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, and Oregon Research
Institute, VOL. 80( No. 4).
Wang, X. L., Shi, K., & Fan, H. X. (2006). Psychological mechanisms of investors in Chinese Stock Markets. Journal of Economic Psycholog,
27(6), 762780.
Weber, E. U., Blais, A.-R., & Betz, N. E. (2002). A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale.Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk. Journal of
Behavioral Decision Making, 263-290.
Weber, E. U., Shafir, S., & Blais, A.-R. (2004). Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals. Risk as variance or coefficient of
variation. Psychological Review, 111(2), 430-445.
Yao, R., & Curl, A. L. (2011). Do Market Returns Influence Risk Tolerance? Evidence from Panel Data. Journal of Family and Economic Issues .
32(3), 532-544.
Yao, R., & Hanna, S. (2005). The effect of gender and marital status on financial risk tolerance. Journal of Personal Finance, 4(1), 66-85.
Zaleskiewicz, T. (2001). Zaleskiewicz, T. (2001). Beyond risk seeking and risk aversion: Personality and the dual nature of economic risk taking.
Zhong, L. X., & Xiao, J. J. (1995). Determinants of family bond and stock holdings. Financial Counseling and Planning, 6, 107-114.
Hoffmann, A. O.I., Eije, von .J. H., & Jager, W. (2006). Individual Investors Needs and Conformity Behavior: An Empirical Investigation in The
Netherlands.

www.paom.org.pk