Series No.

467
May 2015

467
2015 5

METAL MINE

1
2

1
2

1
2

1 430065 2
430065 3 510660

20 cm / s

0. 85
19 cm / s

TD235

1001-1250 2015 -05-07-05

Influence of Slope Excavation of Open Pit Mine on the Existing Tunnel

Wu Liang12

Jin Mu3

Li Leibin3

Zhong Dongwang12

Jiang Pei12

1 College of ScienceWuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhan 430065China

2 Blasting Technological esearch CenterCPCE-WUSTWuhan 430065China
3 China ailway Port and Channel Blasting Projects Engineering Co Ltd Guangzhou 510660China
Abstract

In view of the effect of slope blasting and excavation in an open pit mine on the existing tunnelthe particle vi-

bration velocity control standard of the surrounding rock is determined at 20 cm / swith reference of the relevant standards and
similar domestic engineering experience The particle vibration of tunnel wall under the blast loading is monitoredand an installation scheme for measurement instrument is put forward And the attenuation law of particle vibration at tunnel surrounding
rocks is analyzed The fitting coefficients of the vibration velocity attenuation at horizontal radialhorizontal tangential and vertical peak are 0 85 or above Information feedback in time can contribute to optimizing the blasting parameters Combined with
numerical analysisthe vibration velocity of tunnel surrounding rock and the dynamic stress distribution rule are obtained The
peak value of particle vibration velocity at surrounding rock is 19 cm / swhich verifies the reliability of the estimated explosive
quantity The research provides security for the smooth construction
Keywords

Slope engineeringBlastingBlasting vibrationTunnel engineering

10 a

127. 43 m

1-5

20 30

0. 5 3. 0 m

6-10

2015-02-19

51174147 2014CFB822
51004079
1980

 467

2015 5

3
Fig 3
1
Fig 1

Sensor installation

Engineering layout

115 mm
3 5 m 15 16 m 5 m 4. 2
m 5. 0 5. 5 m90
100 110 kg 290 kg
3

5. 0 t 11 458 m 0. 31 kg / m
3
704. 9 m 16. 25 m / m

Fig 4

3. 4

The arrangement layout of survey points

2
Fig 2

Network layout of blasting hole

3. 1

GB 67222003

20 cm / s

0. 01 cm / s

3. 2

2. 0 m

( )

18 mm
10 cm 10 cm 1. 5 cm

1 /3
v = K Q
r

v cm / s Q

3. 3

4
8

kg r m K

Table 1

2015 5
60. 9 kg

Test results of blasting vibration

3
Table 3

/ cm / s

Maximum single charge under different distances

/ kg

/m

150

43. 48

3. 39

7. 4

8. 86

142

43. 48

4. 2

7. 8

7. 24

148

43. 48

8. 79

7. 86

7. 96

278

43. 48

13. 1

24. 3

24

266

43. 48

8. 86

15

13

128

43. 48

6. 93

8. 48

8. 79

134

43. 48

4. 66

8. 52

5. 07

50

2 639. 5

951. 2

1471. 1

290

43. 48

26. 99

25. 3

15. 8

60

4 561. 0

1 643. 7

2 542. 1

132

43. 48

5. 13

12. 47

6. 16

126

43. 48

6. 07

7. 65

1. 92

138

43. 48

4. 39

7. 08

3. 78

190

43. 48

6. 11

5. 93

4. 56

190

43. 48

6. 23

5. 46

2. 53

278

63. 47

6. 93

150

63. 47

5. 68

5. 53

136

63. 47

3. 6

3. 59

142

63. 47

3. 6

2. 99

278

63. 47

3. 57

3. 48

266

63. 47

2. 76

2. 77

290

63. 47

3. 43

3. 39

138

63. 47

5. 1

4. 91

190

63. 47

8. 79

190

63. 47

7. 26

7. 15

190

63. 47

8. 81

8. 8

134

249. 7

0. 94

0. 65

0. 38

276

249. 7

1. 08

0. 8

0. 63

150

249. 7

0. 77

0. 53

0. 4

142

249. 7

0. 53

0. 63

0. 27

136

249. 7

0. 77

0. 55

0. 47

148

249. 7

0. 51

0. 33

0. 2

278

249. 7

0. 74

0. 55

0. 61

266

249. 7

0. 97

0. 79

0. 58

/m

/ kg

10

21. 1

7. 6

11. 8

20

168. 9

60. 9

94. 2

30

570. 1

205. 5

317. 8

40

1 351. 4

487. 0

753. 2

y
z x

SOLID164
3
2. 5 t / m
40 GPa 0. 3 50

1. 5 MPa 30 GPa 0. 33
3
39 0. 7 MPa 2. 4 t / m
=
0. 04 = 0. 000 3
5

2 2

0. 8
2
Table 2

Blasting vibration attenuation law

( Qr )

1 /3 1. 31

v = 107. 8

0. 85

32

5
Fig 5

Dynamic stress cloud chart at different time

v = 297. 4

( Qr )

0. 95

21

v = 247. 9

( Qr )

4 6

0. 86

32

ABCD

1 /3 1. 66

1 /3 1. 70

20 m
9

 467

2015 5

19 cm / s

6
Fig 6

Investigation points

7
V x V y V z XYZ

0. 65 MPa

1
GB67222003

3

19 cm / s

2000
6 2 6-10

Yang NianhuaLiu Hui Vibration field at tunnel contour induced by

a close-in blastingJ Engineering Blasting
2000
6 2 6-10
2
J
2004
38 2 204-209
Liu GuohuaWang Zhenyu Dynamic response and blast-resistance analysis of a tunnel subjected to blast loadingJ Journal of Zhejiang
University Engineering Science
2004
38 2 204-209
3

2009
34 10 1339-1343
J
Wu LiangZhong Dongwang Effect of tunneling blasting on the existing adjacent tunnel under different conditionsJ Journal of China Coal Society
2009
34 10 1339-1343
4

2013 10 32-35.
Liu MingZhang Changsuo Design and practice of optimizing blas-

Fig 7

7
Particle vibration curve of each investigation point
V x V y V z

V z

Vy
V x
10

ting of double-track railway tunnelJ Metal Mine

2013 10 3235
5

J 201233 1 7983
Meng FanbingLin CongmouZheng Qianget al Influence of expanded four-lane tunnel blasting vibration on new tunnelJ Journal

of Huaqiao University Natural Science

2012
33 1 79-83
6
2013 4 54-56.
J

2015 5
tunnelJ Journal of Water esources and Architectural Engineering
2011
9 2 73-76

Li ChangcunGuo YanhuiWang Changjunet al esearch on the

2012
32 S2 3471-3477
J

slope synthetically control with blasting vibration and displacement

Li NingZhang ChengkeZhou Zhong Influence research of slope

2013 4 54-56
monitoringJ Metal Mine
7
2009
35 5 1399-1402
J

blasting excavation on adjacent existed tunnelJ Chinese Journal

of ock Mechanics and Engineering
2012
32 S2 3471-3477
10

Zhao DongpingWang MingnianJia Lingli esearch on influence of

2012
29 1 110-114
J

excavating road trench slope on adjacent existing tunnelJ ock

Huang ZhiqiangWu Li Effects of blasting vibration on stability of

2009
35 5 1399-1402
and Soil Mechanics
8 J
2011
9 2 73-76

2012
29 1
bedding rock slope at tunnel entranceJ Blasting
110-114

Zhang Hailong Analysis on impact of slope excavation on railway

11