Rpms - Meriam Master Teacher I 2016

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
Region V
DIVISION OF ALBAY
Daraga North District
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHER
June 2015 - March 2016
Name of Employee: MERIAM M. REONAL
Position: Master Teacher I
School: BAGTANG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Name of Rater: NIDA M. BOARAO

Position: Principal I
Date of Review: April 5, 2016
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
Major Final
Outcomes
Key Result Areas

(KRAs)
Professional Growth and
Development 25%
Objectives
Timeline
Take charge of the school reading program, remedial

and/or enrichment program.
Weight per
KRA
Performance Indicators
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Rating
E
T
Ave
4.0
0.400
5.0
0.250
5.0
0.250
Score
5-Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve

proficiency level of at least 4 pupils to at least one step higher in every
quarter.
proficiency level of at least 2 pupils/students to at least one step higher in
every quarter.
10%

proficiency level of at least 3 pupils to at least one step higher in every
quarter.
proficiency level of at least 1 pupils/students to at least one step higher in
every quarter.
1-No evidence of conducting remedial program
Participate in the planning and implementation of

training programs in school, district and division
level.
5-Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the

division level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled
time.
4-Participated in the planning of at least 2 training programs conducted in the

district level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled
time.
5%
3- Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the

district level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled
time.
2-Participated in the planning of at least 2 training program conducted in the
school level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled
time
1-No evidence of participation in planning training programs.
Participate in seminars, workshops, trainings within a June 2015 - March 2016

year (Division, Regional and National)
5-Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers

in an excellent way with documentation
4- Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an
excellent way with documentation
5%
3- Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to

teachers.
2-Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
1-No trainings attended
Conducts at least one action research.
5-Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in

the Division Level Research Conference/Summit
4- Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in

the District Level Research Conference/Summit
5%
3- Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result
in any level of research conference/summit
4.0
0.200
5.0
0.500
4.0
0.400
5.0
0.500
4.0
0.200
2-Proposed an action research.

1-Conceptualize an action research
Instructional Competence 45%
Prepares daily logs and visual aid related to the lesson June 2015 - March 2016
5-100% Prepared daily logs and visual aid related to the lesson
4-84%-99% Prepared daily logs and visual aid related to the lesson
10%
3-68%-83% Prepared daily logs and visual aid related to the lesson
2-52%-67 Prepared daily logs and visual aid related to the lesson
1-51%-below Prepared daily logs and visual aid related to the lesson
Conduct remedial episodes classes for slow learners
5-100% fully conducted remedial classes for slow learners

4-84%-99% aconducted remedial classes for slow learners
10%
3-68%-83% conducted remedial classes for slow learners

2-52%-67 conducted remedial classes for slow learners
1-51%-below conducted remedial classes for slow learners
Carries regular teaching load for grade/subject area.
5- 75%-100% carried teaching loads for grade/subject area

4- 65%-74% Carried teaching loads for grade/subject area
10%
3- 55%-64% Carried teaching loads for grade/subject area.

2- 54%-below Carried teaching loads for grade/subject area.
1- did not materialized
Serve as demonstrator teacher, facilitator or

resource speaker at the school level and or provided
mentoring services to demonstration teachers
5-Excellent execution of the lesson plan and excellent mentoring services

provided to the demonstration teacher
4- Very Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Very Satisfactory
mentoring services provided to the demonstration teacher
5%
3- Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Satisfactory mentoring

services provided to the demonstration teacher
2- Fair execution of the lesson plan and Fair mentoring services provided to
the demonstration teacher.
1- Poor execution of the lesson plan and Poor mentoring services provided to
the demonstration teacher
Interpret test results and utilize
5-100% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period
and submitted before the scheduled time.
4-84%-99% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading
period and submitted before the scheduled time.
5%
3-68%-83% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading
4.0
0.200
4.3
0.108
4.3
0.108
4.3
0.433
4.3
0.433
2-52%-67 of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading
1-51%-below of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading
Observe 100% of the required learning

competencies for the students in every quarter.
5-100% fully attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above

proficiency level.
4-84%-99% attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above
proficiency level.
2.5%
3-68%-83% attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above

proficiency level.
2-52%-67 attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above
proficiency level.
1-51%-below attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above
proficiency level.
Initiate projects and programs that will enhance the

curriculum and its delivery to achieve 75% NAT
performance
5-Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and
achieve 75% in NAT Performance.
4- Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and
achieve 65%-74% in NAT Performance.
2.5%
achieve 55%-64% in NAT Performance.
achieve 54%-below in NAT Performance.
1-the project or program did not materialized
Assist principals in instructional monitoring of teacher June 2015 - March 2016
5-100% Assisted the principals in instructional monitoring of teacher

4-84%-99% Assisted the principals in instructional monitoring of teacher
Instructional Supervision 30%
10%
3-68%-83% oAssisted the principals in instructional monitoring of teacher

2-52%-67 Assisted the principals in instructional monitoring of teacher
1-51%-below Assisted the principals in instructional monitoring of teacher
Conduct mentoring/coaching activities and prepare

instructional material available
5-Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 100% of the teachers and

prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented.
4- Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 84%-99%% of the teachers
and prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented.
10%
3- Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 68%-83% of the teachers and

2- Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 52%-67% of the teachers and
1-no evidence of mentoring/coaching conducted
5-100% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary
technical assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
Guided co-teachers in the performance of duties and June 2015 - March 2016
responsibilities
4-84%-99% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary
5%
3-68%-83% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary
4.7
0.233
4.0
0.200
2-52%-67 of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary
1-51%-below of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary
Check lesson plans of teachers in the assigned

grade/subject area.
5-100% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted
the observation log every end of the month.
4-84%-99% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and
submitted the observation log every end of the month.
5%
3-68%-83% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and

2-52%-67 of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and
1-51%-below of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and
4.417
Over-all Rating of Assessment

Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding
4.500-5.000
Very Satisfactory
3.500-4.499
Satisfactory
2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory
1.500-2.499
Poor
1.000-1.499
MERIAM M. REONAL
MASTER TEACHER I
(Ratee)
NIDA M. BOARAO
Principal I
(Rater)
BEBIANO I. SENTILLAS
Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Athority
Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region V
DIVISION OF ALBAY
Daraga North District
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHER
Name of Employee: MERIAM M. REONAL
Position: Master Teacher I
School: BAGTANG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Name of Rater: NIDA M. BOARAO

Position: Principal I
Date of Review: 4-14-2016
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
Major Final
Outcomes
Key Result Areas

(KRAs)
Instructional
Competence 45%
Objectives
Timeline
Provide technical assistance to teachers to

improve their competencies
Weight per KRA
Performance Indicators
TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Actual Results
Rating
T
Ave
Score
5.0
0.75
4.0
0.40
3.0
0.15
4.7
0.23
4.0
0.20
5-mentored 100% of the teachers in every quarter and submitted the needed evidences on the
last day of the quarter.
4-mentored84%-99% of the of the teachers in every quarter and submitted the needed evidences
on the last day of the quarter.
15%
3-mentored 68%-83% of the teachers in every quarter and submitted the needed evidences on
the last day of the quarter.
2-mentored 52%-67 of the teachers in every quarter and submitted the needed evidences on the
last day of the quarter.
1-mentored 51%-below of the teachers in every quarter and submitted the needed evidences on
the last day of the quarter.
Initiate improvements in instructional programs
5-initiated at least one successful instructional program to 100% of the teachers with full
documentation.
4-initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 84%-99% of the teachers
with full documentation.
10%
1-no evidence of initiating instructional program.
5-lead 100% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with full
documentation.
Lead in the preparation of instructional materials June 2015 - March 2016
4-lead 84%-99%% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year
5%
3-lead 68%-83% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with
full documentation.
2-lead 52%-67% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with
full documentation.
1-no evidence of leading in preparation of instructional program.
Serve as demonstrator teacher, facilitator or

resource speaker at the school level and or
provided mentoring services to demonstration
teachers
5-Excellent execution of the lesson plan and excellent mentoring services provided to the
demonstration teacher
4- Very Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Very Satisfactory mentoring services
provided to the demonstration teacher
5%
3- Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Satisfactory mentoring services provided to the
demonstration teacher
2- Fair execution of the lesson plan and Fair mentoring services provided to the demonstration
teacher.
1- Poor execution of the lesson plan and Poor mentoring services provided to the demonstration
teacher
5-100% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before
the scheduled time.
4-84%-99% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted
before the scheduled time.
5%
5%
3-68%-83% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted
4.0
0.20
4.3
0.11
4.3
0.11
4.3
0.43
4.3
0.43
4.7
0.23
2-52%-67 of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted
1-51%-below of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted
Observe 100% of the required learning

competencies for the students in every quarter.
5-100% fully attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above proficiency level.
4-84%-99% attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above proficiency level.
2.5%
3-68%-83% attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above proficiency level.
2-52%-67 attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above proficiency level.
1-51%-below attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above proficiency level.
Initiate projects and programs that will enhance

the curriculum and its delivery to achieve 75%
NAT performance
5-Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 75% in NAT
Performance.
4- Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 65%-74% in
NAT Performance.
2.5%
3- Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 55%-64% in
NAT Performance.
2- Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 54%-below
in NAT Performance.
1-the project or program did not materialized
Observe teachers every quarter
5-100% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at
the end of the quarter.
4-84%-99% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form
at the end of the quarter.
Instructional Supervision
30%
10%
3-68%-83% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form
2-52%-67 of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form
1-51%-below of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist
form at the end of the quarter.
Conduct mentoring/coaching activities and

prepare instructional material available
5-Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 100% of the teachers and prepared innovative

instructional materials fully documented.
4- Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 84%-99%% of the teachers and prepared

innovative instructional materials fully documented.
10%
3- Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 68%-83% of the teachers and prepared innovative

2- Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 52%-67% of the teachers and prepared innovative
1-no evidence of mentoring/coaching conducted
Guided co-teachers in the performance of duties June 2015 - March 2016

and responsibilities
5-100% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the
carry-over of their duties and functions.
4-84%-99% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in
the carry-over of their duties and functions.
5%
3-68%-83% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in
2-52%-67 of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in
1-51%-below of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance
in the carry-over of their duties and functions.
Check lesson plans of teachers in the assigned

grade/subject area.
5-100% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log
every end of the month.
4-84%-99% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation
log every end of the month.
5%
3-68%-83% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation
4.0
0.20
4.0
0.40
4.0
0.20
4.0
0.20
4.3
0.22
2-52%-67 of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation
1-51%-below of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the
observation log every end of the month.
Conducts at least one action research.
5-Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the Division Level
Research Conference/Summit
4- Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the District Level
Research Conference/Summit
Professional Growth and

Development 25%
10%
3- Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any level of
research conference/summit
2-Proposed an action research.
1-Conceptualize an action research
Take charge of the school reading program,

remedial and/or enrichment program.
5-Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency level of at

least 4 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter.
least 2 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
5%

least 3 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter.
least 1 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter.
1-No evidence of conducting remedial program
Participate in the planning and implementation of June 2015 - March 2016

training programs in school, district and division
level.
5-Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the division level and
submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time.
4-Participated in the planning of at least 2 training programs conducted in the district level and
5%
3- Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the district level and
2-Participated in the planning of at least 2 training program conducted in the school level and
submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time
1-No evidence of participation in planning training programs.
Participate in seminars, workshops, trainings

within a year (Division, Regional and National)
5-Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent way
with documentation
4- Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent way with
documentation
5%
3- Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.

2-Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers.
1-No trainings attended
4.27
Over-all Rating of Assessment

Adjectival Rating Scale
Outstanding
4.500-5.000
Very Satisfactory
3.500-4.499
Satisfactory
2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory
1.500-2.499
Poor
1.000-1.499
MERIAM M. REONAL
MASTER TEACHER I
(Ratee)
NIDA M. BOARAO
Principal I
(Rater)
Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Athority
PART II: COMPETENCIES

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
5 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development.
5 Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes
into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
5 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
5 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through grant chart, checklists, etc.) to
achieve goals.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and other.
Professionalism and Ethics
5 Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and
Ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713).
5 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the
impact of his/her actions and decisions.
5 Maintains a professional image: being trustwothy, regularity of attendance and
punctuality, good grooming and communication.
5 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
5 Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs,
improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness.
Result Focus
5 Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
5 Avoids rework, mistakes and wasted through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
5 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly and consitently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work
in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervisio required.
5 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency.
May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work method to improve performance.
Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently;
or improving quality, customer satisfaction, marale, without setting any specific goal.
Teamwork
5 Willingly does his/her share of resposibility.
5 Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment
across the organization.
5 Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
5 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to
accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
Service Orientation
5 Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
5 Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service
issues and concerns.
5 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women empowerment.
5 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on
DepEd Strategies and directions.
5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures
that will further enhance service delivery.
Innovation
4 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solution. Fosters new
ideas, processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational
efficiency).
4 Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on improving
personal productivity to create higher value and results.
4 Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or
solutions.
4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work
unit and organization.
4 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness
and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
CORE SKILLS
Oral Communication
5 Follows instructions accurately.
5 Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately
5 Uses appropriate medium for the message.
5 Adjust communication style to others.
5 Guides discussions between and among peer
Written Communication
4 Knows the different written business communi
in the Deped
4 Writes routine correspondence/communication
report based on readily available information d
or grammatical error/s (e.g. Memos, minutes,
4 Secures information from required references
notices, instructions) for specefic purposes.
4 Self- edits words, numbers, phonetic notation
4 Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conscien
her written communications.
Computer/ICT Skills
2 Prepares basic compositions (e.g., letters, rep
graphics presentation using Word Processing
3 Identifies different computer parts, turns the co
a given task with acceptable speed and accur
computer peripherals ( e.g. Printers, modems,
2 Prepares simple presentation using Powerpoin
2 Utilizes technologies to: access information to
productivity, assists in conducting research an
and global professional networks.
2 Recommends appropriate and updated techno
and professional practice.
OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
CORE SKILLS
OVERALL RATING
al Communication
llows instructions accurately.
presses self clearly, fluently and articulately.
es appropriate medium for the message.
just communication style to others.
uides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective.
ritten Communication
ows the different written business communication formats used
ites routine correspondence/communications, narrative and desciptive

port based on readily available information data with minimal spelling
grammatical error/s (e.g. Memos, minutes, etc.).
cures information from required references (i.e., Directories, schedules,
tices, instructions) for specefic purposes.
lf- edits words, numbers, phonetic notation and content, if necessary.
monstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conscience and effectiveness in his/
r written communications.
omputer/ICT Skills
epares basic compositions (e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and
aphics presentation using Word Processing and Excel.
entifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on
given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects
mputer peripherals ( e.g. Printers, modems, multimedia projectors, etc).
epares simple presentation using Powerpoint.
lizes technologies to: access information to enhance professional
oductivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local
d global professional networks.
commends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity
d professional practice.
LL COMPETENCY RATINGS
EHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
4.833
3.80
4.318
DepEd RPMS Form for Teachers
PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance results
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives
Rating
Adjectival Rating
4.417
Very Satisfactory
Rater- Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.
Name of Employee
Signature
MERIAM M. REONAL
Name of Superior
Signature
NIDA M. BOARAO
PART IV: DEVELOPMENTAL PLANS

Strengths
Self Management
Developmental Needs
Computer / ICT Skills
Action Plan
(Recommended Developmental
Intervention)
Training Workshop
Timeline
Resources Needed
Year-round
ICT Expert, Fund-Personal, MOOE
Professionalism and Ethics
MERIAM M. REONAL
Master Teacher I
(Ratee)
NIDA M. BOARAO
Principal I
(Approving Authority)
(Rater)
DepEd RPMS Form for Teachers
PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND COACHING FORM

DATE
CRITICAL INCIDENCE DESCRIPTION
OUTPUT
D COACHING FORM
IMPACT ON JOB/
ACTION PLAN
SIGNATURE
(RATER/RATEE)

Rpms - Meriam Master Teacher I 2016

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rpms - Meriam Master Teacher I 2016

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

Name of Rater: NIDA M. BOARAO

Key Result Areas

Take charge of the school reading program, remedial

June 2015 - March 2016

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

5-Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve

3-Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve

Participate in the planning and implementation of

5-Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the

June 2015 - March 2016

4-Participated in the planning of at least 2 training programs conducted in the

3- Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the

Participate in seminars, workshops, trainings within a June 2015 - March 2016

5-Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers

3- Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to

Conducts at least one action research.

5-Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in

June 2015 - March 2016

4- Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in

2-Proposed an action research.

Instructional Competence 45%

Conduct remedial episodes classes for slow learners

June 2015 - March 2016

5-100% fully conducted remedial classes for slow learners

3-68%-83% conducted remedial classes for slow learners

Carries regular teaching load for grade/subject area.

June 2015 - March 2016

5- 75%-100% carried teaching loads for grade/subject area

3- 55%-64% Carried teaching loads for grade/subject area.

Serve as demonstrator teacher, facilitator or

5-Excellent execution of the lesson plan and excellent mentoring services

3- Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Satisfactory mentoring

Interpret test results and utilize

June 2015 - March 2016

Observe 100% of the required learning

June 2015 - March 2016

5-100% fully attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above

3-68%-83% attained/realized learning competencies with 75% and above

Initiate projects and programs that will enhance the

June 2015 - March 2016

Assist principals in instructional monitoring of teacher June 2015 - March 2016

5-100% Assisted the principals in instructional monitoring of teacher

Instructional Supervision 30%

3-68%-83% oAssisted the principals in instructional monitoring of teacher

Conduct mentoring/coaching activities and prepare

June 2015 - March 2016

5-Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 100% of the teachers and

3- Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 68%-83% of the teachers and

Check lesson plans of teachers in the assigned

June 2015 - March 2016

3-68%-83% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and

Over-all Rating of Assessment

Republic of the Philippines

Name of Rater: NIDA M. BOARAO

Key Result Areas

Provide technical assistance to teachers to

June 2015 - March 2016

Weight per KRA

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

Initiate improvements in instructional programs

June 2015 - March 2016

Lead in the preparation of instructional materials June 2015 - March 2016