Professional Documents
Culture Documents
U.S.DepartmentofTransportation
FederalHighwayAdministration
1200NewJerseyAvenue,SE
Washington,DC20590
2023664000
FederalHighwayAdministrationResearchandTechnology
Coordinating,Developing,andDeliveringHighwayTransportation
Innovations
SearchResearch&Technology
Thisreportisanarchivedpublicationandmaycontaindatedtechnical,contact,andlinkinformation
FederalHighwayAdministration>Publications>ResearchPublications>Safety>98057>HumanFactorsDesignGuidelines
forAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO)
PublicationNumber:FHWARD98057
HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvanced
TravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)and
CommercialVehicleOperations(CVO)
CHAPTER4:GENERALGUIDELINESFORADVANCED
TRAVELERINFORMATIONSYSTEM(ATIS)CONTROLS
ThischapterprovideshumanfactorsdesignguidelinesrelevanttothecontrolsassociatedwithATIS
devices.ATIScontrolsrepresenttheprimarymeansbywhichthedriverinteractswiththesystemand,
therefore,theirdesigniscriticaltosuccessfuluseofATISdevices.Thefollowingdesigntopicsare
includedinthischapter:
MANUALCONTROLS
SelectionofControlType
ControlMovementCompatibility
ControlCoding
SelectionofKeyboardsforATISDevices
ProvidingDestinationPreviewCapability
OTHER
DesignofSpeechBasedControls
SELECTIONOFCONTROLTYPE
Introduction:Selectionofcontroltypereferstotheapparatusbywhichthedrivermakescontrolinputs
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
1/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
(i.e.,pushbuttons,pushpullknobs,rotaryknobs(discreteandcontinuous),levers,slides,
thumbwheels,toggleswitches,orrockerswitches).Selectionofappropriatecontroltypesisimportant
todecisionsregardingcontrollocation,becausesomecontroltypesaremoresuitedtoparticular
locations,and,conversely,particularlocationsareidealforcertaintypesofcontrols.
DesignGuidelines***
Thetablesbelowprovidesasummaryofthesuggestedcontroltypeswithrespectto
variousdesignandhumancomputerinterfacecharacteristics.Recommendationsfor
controlselectionsfromthevarioushumanfactorssourcesareingoodagreement(see
References1,2,3,and4).
ControlFunction
SuggestedControlType
Selectionbetweentwoalternativesor
discretepositionse.g.,on/off.
Toggleswitch,twopositionstalk,push
pullknob,pushbutton,orrockerswitch.
Selectionamongthreeormorealternatives
ordiscretepositionse.g.,modesof
operationforclimatecontrols.
Slide,multipurposestalk,discreterotary
knob,threepositiontoggleorrocker
switch,pushbuttons(forthreealternatives
only),keypad,ortouchscreen.
Preciseadjustmente.g.,radiovolume.
Continuousrotaryknoborthumbwheel.
Grossadjustmente.g.,intermittent
windshieldwiper.
Continuousrotaryknob,lever,ortouch
screen.
Largeforceapplicatione.g.,columntilt.
Lever.
ExpectedControlLocation
SuggestedControlType
Panel
Toggleswitch,rotaryknob,pushpullknob,
thumbwheel,slide,pushbutton,rocker
switch,touchscreen,orkeypad.
Stalk
Rotaryonendorinmiddleofstalk,push
buttononendofstalk,orsmallslide.
Pod
Pushbuttonorthumbwheel.
Steeringwheel,side
Stalkorlever.
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
2/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
Steeringwheel,front
Pushbutton.
ControlTaskRequirement
SuggestedControlType
Blindoperation
Toggleswitch,rockerswitch,discrete
rotaryknob,orkeypad.
Tactilefeedback
Toggleswitch,rockerswitch,pushtolock
pushbutton,slidewithdetents,discrete
rotaryknob,orkeypad.
Visualidentificationofcontrolposition
Toggleswitch,rotary,slide,orlever.
Easycheckreadinginanarrayofcontrols
Toggleswitch,rotary,slide,orlever.
Fastactuation
Toggleswitch,twopositionstalk,rocker
switch,orpushbutton.
SupportingRationale:Controlsvarynotonlyintermsoftheirfunctions,applications,andmethodsof
operations,butalsowithrespecttosuchcharacteristicsastheirrelativespacerequirements,the
likelihoodofaccidentalactivation,andtheeasewithwhichthepositionofthecontrolcanbeidentified.
Thesecharacteristicsshouldbeconsideredwhendeterminingthemethodofoperationandcontroltype
forsecondaryautomotivecontrols.
SpecialDesignConsiderations:Selectionofacontroltypeisaniterativeprocess,involvingtrade
offsbetweenavarietyofcompetingdesignconcerns.Inparticular,controlselectionrequiresan
analysisofthefollowingdrivervehiclesystemconsiderations(adaptedfromReference1):(1)the
functionofthecontrol,(2)thedesiredlocationofthecontrol,(3)therequirementofthecontroltask,(4)
thevehicleenvironment,and(5)theconsequenceofdrivererror.
CrossReferences:
ControlMovementCompatibility
ControlCoding
KeyReferences:
1.Chapanis,A.,&Kinkade,R.G.(1972).Designofcontrols.InH.P.VanCott&R.G.
Kinkade(Eds.),Humanengineeringguidetoequipmentdesign(rev.ed.)(pp.345379).
Washington,DC:U.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice.
2.Boff,K.R.,&Lincoln,J.E.(Eds.).(1988).Engineeringdatacompendium:Human
perceptionandperformance.WrightPattersonAirForceBase,OH:Armstrong
AerospaceMedicalResearchLaboratory.
3.Woodson,D.E.,&Conover,D.W.(1964).Humanengineeringguideforequipment
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
3/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
designers.Berkeley,CA:UniversityofCaliforniaPress.
4.MILSTD1472D.(1989).Humanengineeringdesigncriteriaformilitarysystems,
equipmentandfacilities.Washington,DC:U.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice.
*Primarilyexpertjudgement
**Expertjudgementwithsupportingempiricaldata
***Empiricaldatawithsupportingexpertjudgement
****Primarilyempiricaldata
Top
CONTROLMOVEMENTCOMPATIBILITY
Introduction:Controlmovementcompatibilityreferstotheexpectedrelationshipsbetweencontrol
actuationmovementsandthecorrespondingmovementsorchangesinthesystembeingcontrolled.
Makingcontrolmovementsconsistentwiththedriver'sexpectationscandecreasereactiontimes,
learningtimes,andcontrolerrors,andincreasedriversatisfactionwiththevehicle'scontrols.
DesignGuidelines***
Controlmovementsshouldcorrespondtotheexpectationsoftheuser.Seetable
belowforrecommendedcontrolmovementtosystemfunctionrelationships.
Expectationsforuptoincreaseareprobablystrongerthanthoseforclockwise
toincrease.
RecommendedControlMovementtoSystemFunctionRelationship
SystemFunction
ControlMovement
On
Up,right,forward,pull
Off
Down,left,rearward,push
Right
Clockwise,right
Left
Counterclockwise,left
Up
Up,rearward
Down
Down,forward
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
4/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
Increase
Up,right,forward,clockwise
Decrease
Down,left,rearward,counterclockwise
SupportingRationale:Thecontrolmovementtosystemfunctionrelationshipsarerecommended
basedonareviewofseveraldifferenthumanfactorssources(seeReferences1and2).Theoptimum
directionofmovementforagivencontroldependsonanumberoffactors,including:(1)thepositionof
theoperatorrelativetothecontrol,(2)thepositionanddirectionofmovementofanyassociated
display,(3)thechangeresultingfromthecontrolmovement,and(4)thecontrolmovementto
systemfunctionrelationshipsforothercontrolsthatthedriveruses.
SpecialDesignConsiderations:AccordingtoReference3,itmaybenecessarytoviolateone
compatibilityrelationshipinordertotakeadvantageofanotheroneinthedesignofasystem.An
exampleofthisistherotarystalkcontrol.Inordertoincreasesomeparameterusingthelefthand
stalk,thecontrolmustberotateduporcounterclockwise.Althoughupisthecorrectmovementfor
increasingasystemfunction,counterclockwiseisnot.Therefore,thedesignermustdeterminewhichof
thedriver'sexpectationsisstrongerorwhichcanbeviolatedwithoutaffectingthedriver'sabilityto
effectivelyusethesystem.
CrossReferences:
SelectionofControlType
ControlCoding
KeyReferences:
1.Chapanis,A.,&Kinkade,R.G.(1972).Designofcontrols.InH.P.VanCott&R.G.
Kinkade(Eds.),Humanengineeringguidetoequipmentdesign(rev.ed.)(pp.345379).
Washington,DC:U.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice.
2.Sanders,M.S.,&McCormick,E.J.(1993).Humanfactorsinengineeringanddesign
(5thed.)NewYork:McGrawHill.
3.Rogers,S.P.,&Campbell,J.L.(1991).Guidelinesforautomobilehandcontrollocations
andactuationsbasedupondriverexpectanciesandergonomicprinciples(TR9471).
SantaBarbara,CA:AnacapaSciences,Inc.
*Primarilyexpertjudgement
**Expertjudgementwithsupportingempiricaldata
***Empiricaldatawithsupportingexpertjudgement
****Primarilyempiricaldata
Top
CONTROLCODING
Introduction:Controlcodingreferstothedesigncharacteristicsofcontrolsthatservetoidentifythe
controlortoidentifytherelationshipbetweenthecontrolandthefunctiontobecontrolled.Proper
codingofcontrolswillincreasetheprobabilitythatthecontrolswillbequicklyandaccuratelylocatedby
drivers,thusreducingtheeyesoffroadtime.
DesignGuidelines***
Useoneormoreofthefollowingdesigncharacteristicstoidentifycontrols:
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
5/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
LocationCoding:Inordertoensurediscriminableanduniquecontrollocations,
controlsmustbeseparatedbydistancesthataresufficienttoavoidconfusion
amongpositions(seetablebelowentitled"RecommendedMinimumControl
SeparationDistances").
ShapeCoding:Thisismosteffectivewhenusedincombinationwithlocation
coding.Errorsinthedriver'shandpositionareindicatedbythefeelofthecontrol.
SizeCoding:Thisismosteffectivewhenusedincombinationwithlocationcoding.
Asmanyastwoorthreesizescanbeusedtodiscriminatecontrols.Ingeneral,
sizecodingismosteffectiveifthediameteroftheoutermostcontrolis1/2"(1.27
cm)largerthanthenextclosestcontrolonthestalk.
RecommendedMinimumControlSeparation1Distances
Push
Buttons
(No
Array)
Push
Button
Arrays
Rocker
Switches
Toggle
Switches
Thumb
Wheels
Discrete
Rotary
Controls
Continuous
Rotary
Controls
0.5in
2.0in
0.5in
0.5in
0.5in
0.5in
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
(5.08
cm)
(1.27cm)
(1.27cm)
(1.27
cm)
(1.27
cm)
(1.27cm)
(NoArray)
Push
Button
Arrays
2.0in
(5.08
cm)
2.0in
(5.08
cm)
1.5in
(3.81cm)
1.5in
(3.81cm)
1.5in
(3.81
cm)
2.0in
(5.08
cm)
2.0in
(5.08cm)
Rocker
Switches
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
1.5in
(3.81
cm)
0.5in
(1.27cm)
0.75in
(1.91cm)
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
0.5in
(1.27cm)
Toggle
Switches
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
1.5in
(3.81
cm)
0.75in
(1.91cm)
0.75in
(1.91cm)
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
0.75in
(1.91
cm)
0.75in
(1.91cm)
Thumb
Wheels
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
1.5in
(3.81
cm)
0.5in
(1.27cm)
0.5in
(1.27cm)
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
0.75in
(1.91
cm)
0.75in
(1.91cm)
Discrete
Rotary
Controls
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
2.0in
(5.08
cm)
0.5in
(1.27cm)
0.75in
(1.91cm)
0.75in
(1.91
cm)
1.0in
(2.54
cm)
1.0in
(2.54cm)
Continuous
Rotary
Controls
0.5in
(1.27
cm)
2.0in
(5.08
cm)
0.5in
(1.27cm)
0.75in
(1.91cm)
0.75in
(1.91
cm)
1.0in
(2.54
cm)
1.0in
(2.54cm)
ntrol
Push
Buttons
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
6/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
1Separationismeasuredbetweentheoutermostadjacentedges.
SupportingRationale:Severalsources(seeReference1and2)haveprovidedrecommendationsfor
minimumdistancesbetweencontrols.Mostoftheserecommendationshavebeendevelopedfor
applicationinenvironmentsotherthanautomobiles.However,theyprovidehelpfulinformationregarding
locationcodingandavoidanceofinadvertentactivationofadjacentcontrols.
Shapecodingisaneffectivewaytoincreasetheidentifiabilityofcontrolsandismostoftenusedon
rotaryknobs.Moststandardhumanfactorsreferencesprovidegraphicsshowingknobshapesthatare
rarelyconfusedwithoneanother.SeeReference3forsomeoftheseknobdesigns.
Sizecodingismostappropriatewhengangedcontrolsareused(i.e.,twoormoreknobsmountedon
concentricshafts).Differentknobdiametersmustbeusedifthegangedcontrolsaretobe
discriminablefromoneanother.Inautomobiles,forexample,volumeandtonecontrolsontheradio
systemareoftenganged.SuggestionsfordifferentknobdimensionscanbefoundinReferences2and
4.
Therearethreemethodsoftexturecodingthatarerarelyconfusedwithoneanother:smooth,fluted
(horizontallines),andknurled(crisscrosspattern).However,differentmethodsandamountsofeither
flutingorknurlingmaybeconfusedwitheachother.
SpecialDesignConsiderations:Becausedriversaremostoftenoperatinginvehiclecontrolswithout
takingtheireyesofftheroadway,itisimportantthattheybeaseasytolocateandactivateas
possible.Codingcanbeextremelyhelpfulforaccomplishingthis.However,insituationswheregloves
areused,redundantcodingusingcolorsandlabelsmaybecomenecessary.
CrossReferences:
SelectionofControlType
ControlMovementCompatibility
KeyReferences:
1.NuclearRegulatoryCommission.(1981).Guidelinesforcontrolroomdesignreviews
(NUREG0700).Washington,DC:U.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice.
2.Boff,K.R.,&Lincoln,J.E.(Eds.).(1988).Engineeringdatacompendium:Human
perceptionandperformance.WrightPattersonAirForceBase,OH:Armstrong
AerospaceMedicalResearchLaboratory.
3.Hunt,D.P.(1953).Thecodingofaircraftcontrols(TechnicalReport53221).Wright
PattersonAirForceBase,OH:WrightAirDevelopmentCenter.
4.MILSTD1472D.(1989).Humanengineeringdesigncriteriaformilitarysystems,
equipment,andfacilities.Washington,DC:U.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice.
*Primarilyexpertjudgement
**Expertjudgementwithsupportingempiricaldata
***Empiricaldatawithsupportingexpertjudgement
****Primarilyempiricaldata
Top
SELECTIONOFKEYBOARDSFORATISDEVICES
Introduction:SelectionofkeyboardsforATISdevicesreferstotradeoffsandheuristicsassociated
withfixedfunctionvs.variablefunctionkeyboards.AsdiscussedinReference1,examplesofafixed
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
7/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
functionkeyboardincludecashregisterterminalsandhandheldcalculatorsexamplesofavariable
functionkeyboardincludekeyboardsforvideogameswithdifferentcontrolsfordifferentgames,shifted
keysofcomputerkeyboards,and,ingeneral,"soft"keysthatcanbechangedviasoftwarecontrol.
DesignGuidelines**(FromReference1)
Usefixedfunctionkeyboardswhen:
Usevariablefunctionkeyboardswhen:
Onesetoffunctionsisfrequently
employed
Severalsubsetsoffunctionsare
frequentlyused
Functionsmustbeexecuted
quickly
Pacingofentriesisnotforced
Correctfunctionselectionis
critical
Sophisticatedpromptingandfeedback
areavailable
AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofFixedandVariableFunctionKeyboards(fromReference1)
FixedFunctionKeyboards
Advantages
Simplicityofoperation
Fewerkeys
Functionisevidentfromkey
Lessvisualsearch
Minimalsoftwaresupport
Lessarm/handmovement
Logicalkeygrouping
Canbemodifiedbysoftware
changes
Numerousfunctionsrequire
numerouskeys
Increasedfunctionselectiontime
Disadvantages
Frequentvisualsearch
Frequentarm/handmovement
Changesrequirehardware
modification
VariableFunctionKeyboards
Decreasedclarityofkeylabeling
Increasedpromptingandfeedback
requirements
Increasedtrainingrequirements
SupportingRationale:Theguidelinesprovidedabovereflectareviewandanalysisoffixedvs.
variablefunctionkeyboardsreportedinReference1.Theyreflectcommonusageofbothfixedand
variablefunctionkeyboards,aswellasgeneralheuristicsfortheirselection.
SpecialDesignConsiderations:ItmaybedesirabletodesignATISdevicessothattheyincludeboth
fixedandvariablefunctionkeyboardelements.FunctionsthatarecommonacrossATIStaskssuch
as"Enter"or"Back"or"On/Off"mightbestbeaccomplishedbyusingdedicated,fixedfunction(or
"hard")controls.Functionsthatinvolveselectingfromamongalternativesthatvaryfromtasktotask
(selectionof:systemfunctions,mapscale,travelmode,etc.)mightbebestaccomplishedbyusing
nondedicated,variablefunction(or"soft")controls.
Also,whilemanydevicescanprovidethedriverwiththeabilitytocommunicatewithanATIS(e.g.,
touchscreens,speechcontrols,trackballs,pushbuttons),keyboardsarebestfortasksthatinvolve
greatamountsoftextinput,suchasenteringaddressesforRoutingandNavigationapplicationsor
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
8/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
enteringpreferencesandservicesselectioninformationforMotoristServicesapplications.
CrossReferences:
SelectionofControlType
KeyReferences:
1.Greenstein,J.S.,&Arnaut,L.Y.(1987).Chapter11.4:Humanfactorsaspectsofmanual
computerinputdevices.InG.Salvendy(Ed.),Handbookofhumanfactors(pp.1450
1489).NewYork:J.Wiley&Sons,Inc.
*Primarilyexpertjudgement
**Expertjudgementwithsupportingempiricaldata
***Empiricaldatawithsupportingexpertjudgement
****Primarilyempiricaldata
Top
DESIGNOFSPEECHBASEDCONTROLS
Introduction:Designofspeechbasedcontrolsreferstosystemsthatrecognizehumanspeechand
treatspeechcommandsasinputstotheATISsystem.AsdiscussedinReference1,automatic
speechrecognition(ASR)systemsmaybecharacterizedwithrespecttothreesetsofdesign
characteristics.First,speakerdependentsystemsrecognizespeechfromonlyonespeakerthathas
beencalibratedtothesystemspeakerindependentsystemscanrecognizespeechfrommany
speakers.Second,isolatedwordrecognitionsystemsrequirethatspeakersprovideapauseorgap
betweenwordsinamessagecontinuousspeechrecognitionsystemsdonotrequireanypause
betweenwords.Third,ASRsystemsvarywithrespecttothesizeofthevocabularythatthey
recognize.
DesignGuidelines**
Speechcontrolsshouldbeusedtoaidcomplextasksthatinvolvehighcognitive,
visual,and/ormanualrequirements.
VocabularysetsforASRsystemsshouldbefamiliartodriversandshouldavoid
usingsimilarsoundingwordsorphrases.
Driversshouldbeprovidedwithimmediatefeedbackoftherecognitionresultsor
thesystem'sresponsetothespeechinput.
IssuestoConsiderWhenDesigningASRSystems
TaskRelatedIssues
EnvironmentRelatedIssues
SingleversusDual
Task
ExternalNoise(e.g.,
traffic,roadnoise)
Workload
InternalNoise(e.g.,
entertainmentsystem,
conversation)
HeadMovement
Requirements
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
OperatorRelated
Issues
Age
Articulation
RegionalAccents
LevelofTraining
9/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
DrivingSituation
(e.g.,effectsof
stress)
Vibration
Gender
Acceleration/Deceleration
Gforces
Requirementsfor
Feedback
Vocabulary
Requirements
SupportingRationale:Reference2providesconsiderablediscussionofissuesandresearchrelatedto
speechcontrolstheguidelinespresentedabovehavebeenadaptedfromdesignprinciplespresentedin
Reference2and,toalesserextent,Reference1.Theguidelinespresentedabovereflectlimited
experienceintheuseofspeechasacontroldevicefromtwotechnicaldomains:(1)militaryinformation
systemsandflightcontrol,and(2)thetelecommunicationsfield.Casestudiesandanecdotalresults
fromseveralapplicationsofspeechcontrolscanbefoundinReferences1and2.Althoughvarious
commercialspeechrecognitionsystemshavebeendevelopedforautomotiveapplications,published
empiricalresultsarefewandhavenotalwaysprovidedconsistentdesignguidance.
SpecialDesignConsiderations:AsnotedinReference2,keyissuesinthedesignand
implementationofASRsystemsinclude:
Recognitionaccuracy:Loweraccuracieswillreducesystemperformanceanduseracceptance.
Backgroundnoise:Ambientnoise(traffic,radio,speechdisplays)caninterferewithASRsystem
performance.
Speechvariability:Humanspeechvariesconsiderablywithrespecttovolume,frequency,pitch,
andtoneunderdifferentconditions.Speechvariabilitycancontributetoreducedrecognitionof
speech.
Taskselection:Selectionoftasksforwhichspeechshouldbeusedmustreflecttask
characteristicsandaclearunderstandingofthetradeoffsassociatedwithusingspeech
controlsvs.manualcontrols.
CrossReferences:
ATISDesignforSpecialPopulations
KeyReferences:
1.McMillan,G.R.,Eggleston,R.G.,&Anderson,T.R.(1997).Nonconventionalcontrols.
InG.Salvendy(Ed.),Handbookofhumanfactorsandergonomics(pp.729771).New
York:J.Wiley&Sons.
2.Simpson,C.A.,McCauley,M.E.,Roland,E.F.,Ruth,J.C.,&Williges,B.H.(1987).
Speechcontrolsanddisplays.InG.Salvendy(Ed.),Handbookofhumanfactors(pp.
549574).NewYork:J.Wiley&Sons.
*Primarilyexpertjudgement
**Expertjudgementwithsupportingempiricaldata
***Empiricaldatawithsupportingexpertjudgement
****Primarilyempiricaldata
Top
PROVIDINGDESTINATIONPREVIEWCAPABILITY
Introduction:Providingdestinationpreviewcapabilityreferstoprovidingtheuserwiththecapabilityto
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
10/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
recenter(slew)themapandtochangetherangescale(magnification)toenablefullpreviewofroute
details.Theuserofanelectronicmapdisplayingrouteinformationmaydesiretopreviewtheorigin,
destination,oranysegmentoftheroute.Thesystemdesignshould,however,distinguishclearly
betweenarecenteredmapmode(i.e.,vehicleincenterofdisplay)andthenormaldisplaymode(i.e.,
vehiclemovesrelativetostationarymap)showingcurrentpositionoftheuser/vehicle.Failuretoclearly
distinguishbetweenthesetwomodescanresultinconfusionaboutcurrentlocation.
DesignGuidelines**
AllowATISuserstopreviewadetaileddepictionofthedestinationorotherkeynodesor
segmentsofaplannedroute.Thiscapabilitycanbeprovidedbythecombinationofamap
recentering(slew)functionandamapscale(magnification)function.
Function
Description
ExampleImplementation
MapSlew/Recenter
MapScaleControl
CarinCenterofDisplay,
GeographicDefinition,
DefinitionofMapSegment
Touchscreen,orJoystick,or
Trackball
MapModeStatusIndicator
orLockOut
ControlofX,YScalingin
Miles/Kilometers
CautionWhenNotVehicle
Centered
MultistageToggleButtonor
Knob,UpandDownArrows
IndicatorLight,Recenter
ButtonorFunctionAvailable
OnlyWhenStopped
GrandViewofLongRouteDetailedViewofOneNodeRecentered
ImportantNote:ThemapdisplaydepictedaboveisprovidedsolelytoaugmentthisDesignGuidelinebyillustratinggeneral
designprinciples.Itmaynotbesuitableforyourimmediateapplicationwithoutmodification.
SupportingRationale:AsdescribedinReference1,theutilityofelectronicmapsismultipliedby
incorporatingthecombinationofamapscalecontrolandrecenterfunction.Thecombinationofscale
controlandarecenteringfunctionenablestheusertopreviewanyareaofthemapingreaterdetail.The
usercanhaveaAhighleveloverviewofalongrouteoracloserlookatmoredetailedfeaturespertinent
toturns,areasofpotentialnavigationerrors,thedestination,orotherareasofinterest.Withthe
magnifiedview,themapmustberecenteredtoachieveadetailedviewofamoredistantmaplocation.
SpecialDesignConsiderations:Invehiclenavigationdisplaystypicallydepictthevehiclenearthe
centerofthedisplayscreen.Whentheuserrecentersthemap,thevehiclesymbolwillnolongerbein
thenormallocationrelativetothescreen.Thiscanleadtouserconfusionaboutcurrentvehicle
location,particularlyiftheuser=sattentionisturnedelsewhereafterrecentering.Thebenefitsderived
fromempoweringuserstorecenterthemapmustbeweighedagainstthepotentialfor
misinterpretationsofcurrentlocation.Protectionagainstthistypeoferrorcanbedesignedintothe
systembydisplayingacautionindicatororbylockingouttherecenterfunctionwhenthevehicleisin
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
11/12
3/9/2016 Chapter4HumanFactorsDesignGuidelinesforAdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS)andCommercialVehicleOperations(CVO),FH
motion.Ifusersareallowedtosleworrecenterthemapwhileinmotion,asimpleonebuttonreturnto
thenormal,uservehiclecenteredmodeisrecommended.Amodethatallowsthevehicletoalways
remaininthecenterofthescreenmayalsobeprovided.
CrossReferences:
SelectionofControlType
ControlMovementCompatibility
KeyReferences:
1.Clarke,D.L.,McCauley,M.E.,Sharkey,T.J.,Dingus,T.A.,&Lee,J.D.(1996).
Developmentofhumanfactorsguidelinesforadvancedtravelerinformationsystemsand
commercialvehicleoperations:Comparablesystemsanalysis.Washington,DC:Federal
HighwayAdministration(FHWARD95197).
*Primarilyexpertjudgement
**Expertjudgementwithsupportingempiricaldata
***Empiricaldatawithsupportingexpertjudgement
****Primarilyempiricaldata
Top
FHWARD98057
Previous|TableofContents|Next
PageOwner:OfficeofResearch,Development,andTechnology,OfficeofSafety,RDT
ScheduledUpdate:ArchiveNoUpdate
TechnicalIssues:TFHRC.WebMaster@dot.gov
Topics:research,safety
Keywords:Research,Safety,AdvancedTravelerInformationSystems(ATIS),CommercialVehicleOperators(CVO)
Guidelines,HumanFactors,IntelligentTransportationSystems(ITS),InVehicleInformationSystems(IVIS),Motorist
ServicesGuidelines,RoutingandNavigationGuidelines,Safety/WarningGuidelines,AugmentedSignageInformation
Guidelines.
Updated:03/08/2016
UnitedStatesDepartmentofTransportationFederalHighwayAdministration
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/98057/ch04.cfm#control
12/12