This document discusses sperm retrieval techniques for different types of azoospermia:
1) Obstructive azoospermia is caused by physical blockages and has near 100% successful sperm retrieval rates using techniques like PESA.
2) Nonobstructive azoospermia is caused by deficient sperm production and has variable retrieval rates depending on the technique and individual factors like testicular histology.
3) Micro-TESE has higher retrieval success compared to conventional TESE or TESA for nonobstructive azoospermia cases. PESA is effective for obstructive azoospermia while TESA can be used after failed PESA attempts.
This document discusses sperm retrieval techniques for different types of azoospermia:
1) Obstructive azoospermia is caused by physical blockages and has near 100% successful sperm retrieval rates using techniques like PESA.
2) Nonobstructive azoospermia is caused by deficient sperm production and has variable retrieval rates depending on the technique and individual factors like testicular histology.
3) Micro-TESE has higher retrieval success compared to conventional TESE or TESA for nonobstructive azoospermia cases. PESA is effective for obstructive azoospermia while TESA can be used after failed PESA attempts.
This document discusses sperm retrieval techniques for different types of azoospermia:
1) Obstructive azoospermia is caused by physical blockages and has near 100% successful sperm retrieval rates using techniques like PESA.
2) Nonobstructive azoospermia is caused by deficient sperm production and has variable retrieval rates depending on the technique and individual factors like testicular histology.
3) Micro-TESE has higher retrieval success compared to conventional TESE or TESA for nonobstructive azoospermia cases. PESA is effective for obstructive azoospermia while TESA can be used after failed PESA attempts.
Which of the following is correct with regard to azoospermia:
a) obstructive azoospermia (OA) have normal spermatogenesis and a mechanical block somewhere between the epididymis and the ejaculatory duct. Common causes of OA include vasectomy, postinfectious diseases and congenital conditions. b) nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) have extremely deficient or absent sperm production within the testicles. Common causes of NOA include cryptorchidism, orquitis, radio/chemotherapy, use of gonadotoxic medication and steroids, and genetic origin. c) nonobstructive azoospermia have retrieval rates dependent on the method of collection. Testicular histopathology results and Ychromosome microdeletion testing are useful tools to predict the likelihood of sperm retrieval. d) obstructive azoospermia have virtually 100% successful retrievals. Retrieval rates and ICSI outcomes are neither dependent on the method of collection nor on the origin of sperm for ICSI (epididymal or testicular) e) All of the above
MCQ 2 Sperm Retrieval Techniques
The following techniques can be used to retrieve sperm in men with
nonobstructive azoospermia: a) PESA (percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration). b) Micro-TESE (microdissection testicular sperm extraction). c) TESA (testicular sperm aspiration). d) Conventional TESE (testicular sperm extraction) using single or multiple biopsies.
MCQ 3 Sperm Retrieval Techniques
The following statements apply to sperm retrieval techniques:
a) Micro-TESE yields higher sperm retrieval success rates than conventional TESE or TESA. b) PESA is a fast, effective and safe method to retrieve sperm in obstructive azoospermia. Expertise in microsurgery is required for PESA. c) TESA is safe and effective in cases of failed PESA. No expertise in microsurgery is required for TESA. d) MESA is indicated in obstructive azoospermia. Sperm retrieval rates are comparable to PESA although higher sperm number is obtained.
MCQ 4 Sperm Retrieval Techniques
Overall, sperm retrieval success and pregnancy rates by ICSI (using
retrieved sperm) in men with obstructive (OA) and nonobstructive (NOA) azoospermia are: a) 50% and 30%, 70% and 25%, respectively. b) >90% and 40%, 50-60% and 25%, respectively. c) 50% and 30%, respectively, and rates are not dependent on the type of azoospermia being obstructive or nonobstructive. d) 100% and 50% in OA men with vasectomy, and 0% in NOA men with testicular histology showing germ cell aplasia (Sertoli cell-only).