Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Construction
and Building
MATERIALS
www.elsevier.com/locate/conbuildmat
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a laboratory study of evaluating the fatigue characteristics of hot-mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures using
dierent testing methods. In this study, the fatigue performance of HMA mixtures was evaluated with the Superpave indirect tension
(IDT) tests and beam fatigue test. The HMA mixtures containing 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% of recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) were
plant prepared with one source of aggregate, limestone, and one type of binder, PG 6422. The fatigue properties tested included indirect
tensile strength (ITS), failure strain, toughness index (TI), resilient modulus, DCSEf, energy ratio, plateau value, and load cycles to failure. The results from this study indicated that both Superpave IDT and beam fatigue tests agreed with each other in ranking the fatigue
resistance of mixtures when proper procedures were followed.
2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Hot-mix asphalt; Fatigue; Dissipated energy; Indirect tensile strength
1. Introduction
Fatigue cracking is one of the three major distresses
(fatigue cracking, low temperature cracking, and rutting)
of exible pavements. Fatigue cracking is mainly caused
by repeated trac loading and it can lead to signicant
reduction in the serviceability of exible pavements. The
cracking resistance of hot-mix asphalt (HMA) mixtures is
directly related to the fatigue performance of exible pavements. Therefore, the laboratory characterization of the
fatigue behavior of HMA mixtures has been a topic of
intensive study for many years.
Many laboratory testing methods are available to characterize the fatigue behavior of HMA mixtures. Probably
the one that possesses the most similar stress condition to
HMA eld mixtures under trac loading is the repeated
exural test (also called beam fatigue test) [1]. This test
was developed under SHRP-A-003A to evaluate the fatigue
*
0950-0618/$ - see front matter 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.04.019
1324
into damage. This PV can be used to characterize the fatigue life of HMA mixtures. For a strain-controlled test, the
lower the PV, the longer the fatigue life for a specic HMA
mixture [4].
Since the 1970s, fracture mechanics theory has been
used to analyze the fatigue behavior in HMA mixtures
[5]. In recent years, comprehensive laboratory and eld
studies were conducted by Roque et al. at the University
of Florida to characterize the crack growth rate of HMA
mixtures using the Superpave indirect tension (IDT) tests
[68]. They used the three Superpave IDT tests (IDT
strength test, resilient modulus test, and creep test) and
developed a viscoelastic fracture mechanics-based crack
growth law for HMA mixtures. In addition, they introduced two thresholds, the dissipated creep strain energy
(DCSE) limit and the fracture energy (FE) limit, to account
for the crack development and propagation in HMA mixtures. When these two thresholds are not exceeded, only
healable micro-damage occurs. Non-healable macro-damage appears unless one of the thresholds is exceeded. This
suggests that the higher the values of DCSE or FE, the
longer the fatigue life of HMA mixtures [7].
In addition to the traditional fatigue approach and fracture mechanics approach, damage mechanics is also
applied to HMA mixtures to characterize their fatigue
behavior. Kim et al. developed a fatigue model for HMA
mixtures using the elasticviscoelastic correspondence principle and continuum damage mechanics [9,10]. This model
has been successfully used to predict the fatigue life of
HMA mixtures with multiple rest periods based on the
materials viscoelastic properties, loading conditions, and
damage and micro-damage healing characteristics.
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare
the fatigue performance of HMA mixtures based on the
results of dierent laboratory fatigue testing. In this study,
HMA mixtures were plant prepared with one source of
coarse aggregate (limestone), four percentages of recycled
asphalt pavement (RAP) (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%), and
one asphalt binder (PG 6422). The fatigue properties of
HMA mixtures were evaluated using the Superpave IDT
tests and beam fatigue test.
2. Laboratory experiments
Table 1
Asphalt binder properties
Binder status
Binder test
Original binder
Rotational viscosity at
0.52
135 C, Pa s
70 C 0.78
DSR, G*/sin d,
kPa
64 C 1.63
RTFO aged
binder
Specication
3 Pa s max
1.00 kPa min
70 C 1.66
64 C 3.54
3725
238
0.310
6422
Table 2
Properties of aggregates
Sieve
size
Limestone Drock
No. 10
screening
Natural
sand
Manufactured
sand
5/800
1/200
3/800
#4
#8
#30
#50
#100
#200
100%
97%
70%
21%
7%
4%
3%
2.0%
1.8%
100%
100%
100%
92%
61%
29%
21%
20.0%
16.0%
100%
100%
100%
98%
93%
63%
13%
2.0%
1.0%
100%
100%
100%
99%
82%
28%
17%
9.0%
5.0%
Gsb
2.524
2.424
2.501
2.476
2.1. Materials
100
Percent Passing (%)
DSR, G*/sin d,
kPa
Test
results
80
60
Aggregate
40
RAP
20
Design Envelope
Maximum Density Line
0
0
2
3
Sieve Size (0.45 Power)
1325
where,
MR
P GL
DH t D C cmpl
MR = resilient modulus;
P = maximum load;
GL = gage length;
DH = horizontal deformation;
t = thickness of specimen;
D = diameter of specimen;
Ccmpl = nondimensional creep compliance factor,
Ccmpl = 0.6354(X/Y)1 0.332;
(X/Y) = ratio of horizontal to vertical deformation.
DH t D C cmpl
P GL
Mixture
Asphalt content
from RAP (%)
0 % RAP added
10 % RAP added
20 % RAP added
30 % RAP added
0
0.55
1.11
1.66
5.5
4.45
3.89
3.34
AC (%)
Gmm
Gmb
Air voids
VMA
Stability (kN)
Flow (mm)
5.0
2.456
2.356
4.0
16
11.6
2.77
Table 4
Volumetric properties of mixture
Table 3
Asphalt contribution from RAP and virgin asphalt for the mixtures
m2:98 D1
A
1326
2 P C sx
ptD
where,
St = indirect tensile strength;
P = failure load;
Csx = horizontal stress correction factor;
Csx = 0.948 0.01114 (t/D) 0.2693 m + 1.436 (t/
D) m;
m = Poissons ratio, m = 0.1 + 1.480 (X/Y)2 0.778
(t/D)2 (X/Y)2; and
t, D, and (X/Y) are the same as described above.
TI
Ae Ap
e ep
ITS Normalized
Toughness index (TI), a parameter describing the toughening characteristics in the post-peak region, was also calculated from the indirect tensile test results. Fig. 3 presents
an example of normalized indirect tensile stress and strain
curve. A dimensionless indirect tensile toughness index, TI
is dened as follows:
0.8
0.6
0.4
Ap
0.2
where,
0
TI = toughness index;
Ae = area under the normalized stressstrain curve up to
strain e;
Strain
Fig. 3. An example of normalized IDT curve for TI calculation.
ER
St
MR
DCSEf
EE
0
FE
DCSEf
DCSEmin
1327
ef
Se de
1
EE S t ef e0
2
10
11
1328
5.000E+05
4.000E+05
3.000E+05
2.000E+05
1.000E+05
0.000E+00
100
50,100
100,100
150,100
200,100
250,100
Loading Cycles
Fig. 6. Flexural stiness versus loading cycles.
RDEC
II
III
a 1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Load cycles
0%
30%
b 2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0%
10%
20%
30%
RAP content
1.0
0.8
IDT TI
20%
RAP content
Fig. 7. Typical RDEC plot with three behavior zones (after [2]).
and cumulative dissipated energy. Fig. 6 represents a typical stiness versus load cycle plot using an automated fatigue software.
For the beam fatigue test, fatigue life is traditionally
dened as the number of cycles corresponding to a 50%
reduction in initial stiness and initial stiness was measured at the 50th load cycle (AASHTO T321-03). Recently,
Carpenter et al. proposed to use RDEC to determine the
fatigue life [24]. Fig. 7 presents a typical RDEC plot. As
seen from Fig. 7, the curve can be divided into three dierent zones. RDEC value decreases with the load cycle in
zone 1. RDEC value is approximately constant in zone 2,
representing a period where there is a constant percent of
input energy turned into damage. In zone 3, RDEC value
increases with the load cycle, indicating that more and
more input energy are turned into damage and ultimately
the mixture loses the load carrying capability.
10%
0.6
0.4
0.2
Fig. 8 presents the strengths, failure strains, and toughness index (TI) values from the IDT strength test. It can be
seen that mixtures containing higher percentages of RAP
exhibited higher indirect tensile strength (ITS), lower strain
at peak-load, and lower toughness index than the control
0.0
0%
10%
20%
30%
RAP content
Fig. 8. Results from IDT strength test. (a) IDT strength, (b) IDT failure
strain, and (c) IDT TI.
Energy Ratio
1329
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
0%
10%
20%
30%
RAP content
Fig. 11. Energy ratios from Superpave IDT tests.
MR (GPa)
0
0%
10%
20%
3.00
2.50
30%
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
RAP content
0%
10%
20%
RAP content
0%
10%
DCSEf (kJ/m3)
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
140000
120000
30%
100000
80000
60000
40000
20000
0
0.0
0%
10%
20%
30%
20%
30%
RAP content
RAP content
Fig. 10. DCSEf results.
Fig. 12. Results from beam fatigue test. (a) Plateau value and (b) load
cycles to failure.
1330
The results presented in this paper were only the preliminary ndings of a more complete study. Further studies would be needed before the relevant testing methods
can be recommended to evaluate the fatigue performance of HMA mixtures.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the nancial
support from the Tennessee Department of Transportation. Thanks are also due to Mr. William Gibbons and
Mr. Chun-Yip Chan who helped prepare testing specimens.
References
[1] Roberts FL, Kandhal PS, Brown ER, Lee D-Y, Kennedy TW. Hot
mix asphalt materials, mixture design, and construction. Lanham,
Maryland: NAPA Education Foundation; 1996.
[2] Carpenter SH, Ghuzlan K, Shen S. Fatigue endurance limit for
highway and airport pavements. Transportation research record, vol.
1832. Washington DC: National Research Council; 2003. p. 131138.
[3] Ghuzlan K, Carpenter SH. Energy-derived/damage-based failure
criteria for fatigue testing. Transportation research record, vol. 1723.
Washington DC: National Research Council; 2000. p. 141149.
[4] Shen S, Carpenter SH. Application of dissipated energy concept in
fatigue endurance limit testing. Transportation research record, vol.
1929. Washington DC: National Research Council; 2005. p. 165173.
[5] Majidzadeh K, Kaumann EM, Saraf CL. Analysis of fatigue of
paving mixtures from the fracture mechanics viewpoint. ASTM Spec
Tech Publ 1971;508:6784.
[6] Roque R, Zhang Z, Sankar B. Determination of crack growth rate
parameters of asphalt mixtures using the Superpave IDT. J Assoc
Asphalt Paving Technol 1999;68:40433.
[7] Roque R, Birgisson B, Sangpetngam B, Zhang Z. Hot mix asphalt
fracture mechanics: a fundamental crack growth law for asphalt
mixtures. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol 2002;71:81627.
[8] Zhang Z, Roque R, Birgisson B, Sangpetngam B. Identication and
verication of a suitable crack growth law. J Assoc Asphalt Paving
Technol 2001;70:20641.
[9] Kim YR, Little DL, Benson F. Chemical and mechanical evaluation
on healing mechanism of asphalt concrete. J Assoc Asphalt Paving
Technol 1990;59:24076.
[10] Kim YR, Lee H-J, Little DL. Fatigue characterization of asphalt
concrete using viscoelasticity and continuum damage theory. J Assoc
Asphalt Paving Technol 1997;66:52069.
[11] TDOT. Standard specication for road and bridge construction, the
Tennessee Department of Transportation, Nashville, TN, March,
1995.
[12] Roque R, Buttlar WG. The development of a measurement and
analysis system to accurately determine asphalt concrete properties
using the indirect tensile mode. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol
1992;61:30432.
[13] Buttlar WG, Roque R. Experimental development and evaluation of
the new SHRP measurement and analysis system for indirect tensile
testing at low temperature. Transportation research record, vol. 1454.
Washington DC: National Research Council; 1994. p. 163171.
[14] Roque R, Birgisson B, Drakos C, Dietrich B. Development and eld
evaluation of energy-based criteria for top-down cracking performance of hot mix asphalt. J Assoc Asphalt Paving Technol
2004;73:22960.
[15] Huang B, Kingery III WR, Zhang Z. Laboratory study of fatigue
characteristics of HMA mixtures containing RAP. In: International
symposium on design and construction of long lasting asphalt
pavements, Auburn, 2004. p. 50122.