Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pole-Zero Cancellation
K (s z)
T ( s)
2
( s p3 )( s as b)
Example 1
24.542
T1 ( s ) 2
s 4s 24.542
245.42
T2 ( s )
s 10 s 2 4s 24.542
73.626
T3 ( s )
s 3 s 2 4s 24.542
Example 1.
Example 2
26.25( s 4)
C1 ( s )
s ( s 3.5)( s 5)( S 6)
26.25( s 4)
C2 ( s )
s ( s 4.01)( s 5)( S 6)
s ( s 5) ( s 6) ( s 3.5)
0.87
5.3
4.4
0.033
C2 ( s)
s
( s 5) ( s 6) ( s 4.01)
Review
Second Order System
Specification
s1, 2 n n 2 1
cos
Review
Second Order System
Specification
cos
Tp
d
cos
1
4
Ts
n
Tp
max
max
Underdamped system
within specs
max
max
max
max
Imag Axis
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
Real Axis
-3
-2
-1
2 ln 2 (%OS / 100)
A 1.52% overshoot
corresponds to a
damping ratio of 0.8.
Imag Axis
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
Real Axis
-3
-2
-1
Imag Axis
2
0
-2
-4
Second-order
system
approximation
-6
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
Real Axis
-3
-2
-1
Case 1 and 2 yield third poles that are relatively far from the
closed-loop zero. For this two cases there is no pole-zero
cancellation, and the second-order system approximation is not
valid.
In case 3 yield, the third closed-loop pole and the closed-loop
zero are relatively close to each other, and the second-order
system approximation can be considered valid.