Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Flooding
treatments
A. amnicola
Ground
Mound
A. lentiformis
Ground
Mound
Cumulative
mean
%
No
Periodic
Continuous
Cumulative
mean
3.52
3.67
4.37
3.85
3.58
3.75
4.26
3.86
3.23
3.42
3.60
3.41
3.31
3.46
3.54
3.42
3.40 c
3.57 b
3.94 a
+
K content (%) of species.
A. amnicola 3.86 a
A. lentiformis 3.42 b
Mean values followed by different letters are statistically significant at 0.05 P.
Analysis of variance
S.V.
Treatments (T)
Error
Species (S)
TxS
Planting method (M)
TxM
SxM
TxSxM
Error
*
**
N. S
Significant at 0.05 P.
Highly significant at 0.001 P.
Non-significant.
D.F.
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
9
F. value
213.18 *
442.29 **
58.27 *
0.42 N. S
5.78 N. S
0.10 N. S
0.44 N. S
61
4.2
4.2.1
GLASSHOUSE TRIAL:
Shoot elongation of A. amnicola (Fig. 10a) with time course, indicated that
continuously and periodically flooded plants remained depressed throughout the
flooding period, Non-flooded plants showed a linear increase in their shoot
elongation. A. lentiformis (Fig. 10b) also exhibited a similar trend of growth
reduction with time course in shoot elongation of periodically and continuously
flooded plants. No-flooded plants maintained higher plant growth as compared to
flooded plants.
These results agree with findings of Galloway and Davidson (1993) who
reported a reduction in shoot growth of A. amnicola under hypoxic conditions, The
reduced growth under