Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-4-
ﺏ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼ ﹸﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼ ﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﳏﻤـ ﺪ
ﷲﺭ ﹺ
ﺍﳊﻤﺪِ
ﺃﻓﻀ ﹺﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟﹶﻤﲔ.
ﺍﻟﻠـــﻬﻢ...
ﺡ
ﺏ ﻫٰﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻤ ﹺﻞ ﻛﻠﱠﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻭ ﹺ
ﺻ ﹾﻞ ﺛﻮﺍ
ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﹶﺒﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺃﹶﻭ
ﺤﻤﻮ ﺩ ﻭ ﻣ ﻨ ﻪ ﹺﺇﻟﹶﻰ ﹸﻛ ﹺﻞّ
ﷲ ﺍﹾﻟ ﻤ
ﺻ ﹾﻔ ﻮ ﺓ ﺍﹾﻟ ﻮﺟﻮ ﺩ ﺳﹺﻴّﺪﻱ ﺭﺳﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺍ ِ
ﲔ
ﺴ ﻠ ﻤ
ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﹶﻰ ،ﻭﹺﺇﻟﹶﻰ ﻣﺸﺎﹺﻳﺨﻲ ،ﹸﺛﻢ ﹺﺇﻟﹶﻰ ﹸﻛ ﹺﻞّ ﺍﹾﻟ ﻤ
ﹶﺃ ﻭﻟﻴﺎ ِﺀ ﺍ ِ
ﺖ ﺍﻷﺭﺽﹺ ،ﺀﺍﻣﲔ ﻋﺴﻰ ﺃ ﹾﻥ ﻳ ﻨ ﹶﻔ ﻌﻬﻢ ﰲ
ﺤ
ﺽ ﻭﺗ
ﻕ ﺍ َﻷ ﺭ ﹺ
ﻓﻮ
ﺖ ﹸﻛﻞﱠ ﺷـ ﻰﺀٍ،
ﺍﹾﻟ ﹶﻘ ﺒ ﹺﺮ ﻭﻳ ﻮ ﻡ ﺍﹾﻟ ﻌ ﺮﺽﹺ ،ﻳﺎ ﻣ ﻦ ﺭ ﺣ ﻤﺘ ﻪ ﻭ ﺳ ﻌ
ﺴﺒﹺﻲ ﻣ ﻦ ﹸﻛ ﹺﻞّ ﺷ ﻰﺀٍ ،ﻭﹶﺃﺧـﺺ ﻣـ ﻨﻬﻢ ﺷـ ﻴﺨﻲ
ﺖ ﺣ
ﻭﺃﻧ
ﻀ ﹺﻞ
ﺐ ﺍﹾﻟ ﹶﻔ
ﻱ ﺳ ﹾﻠﻄﹶﺎ ﹶﻥ ﻋ ﹶﻠﻤﺎ ِﺀ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎ ﻥ ﺻﺎ ﺣ
ﻭ ﺳﹺﻴّﺪﻱ ﻭﻣﻮﻻ
ﷲ...
ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﺍ ِ
-5-
ﲔ ﻭﹸﺃﻣ ﹰﺔ
ﻱ ﺍﻟﺼـﺎﳊ
ﺖ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﻗﺪ ﻛﻨ
ﺕ ﺍ ُﻷ ﻣ ﻢ
ﺖ ﻟ ﻌﺰﺗﻬﺎ ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺎ
ﻀ ﻌ
ﺧ
ﺲﱄ
ﻳﺎ ﺳﹺﻴّﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﺎ ﹸﻥ ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﻙ ﻟﻴ
ﺕ ﻣ ﻊ ﺍﳋ ﺪ ﻡ
ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻮﻓﺎ ُﺀ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ﹶﳌﻤﺎ
ﲑ ﻣﻠﹾﺆﻫﺎ
ﻳﺎ ﺻﻔﺤ ﹰﺔ ﺑﻴﻀـﺎ َﺀ ﺧـ
ﻣﻜﻨﻮﻧ ﹰﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟ ﹸﻄ ﻬ ﹺﺮ ﺗﻐﺸﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﻟﹺﻨ ﻌ ﻢ
ﺖ ﺎ
ﻳﺎ ﻛﻌـﺒ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﻌـﻠ ﹺﻢ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻃﺎ ﹶﻓ
ﳊﺮﻡ
ﻛـ ﱡﻞ ﺍﻷ ﺩﻟﹼـ ﺔ ﻳﺎ ﹶﻟ ﹶﺬﻳﺎ ﻙ ﺍ ﹶ
ﷲ ﺍﻟﺮﺀﻭﻑ
ﺧﺎﺩ ﻡ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺍﻟﻔﻘ ﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ِ
ﳎﺪﻱ ﻏﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ
-6-
ّ 3
ٍ ٍ
َ َ
-8-
َ ُ
ﺃﻋﻮﺫ ﺑﺎﷲِ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻴﻊِ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﻢِ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻄﺎﻥِ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻴﻢ
ﺽ
ﷲ ﺧ ﹺﲑ ﺍﻷﲰﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻤ ﺪ ﷲ ﻣـﻞ َﺀ ﻛـ ّﹺﻞ ﺃﺭ ﹴ
ﺑﺴﻢﹺ ﺍ ِ
ﺲ ﺍﻷﻧﺒﻴﺎﺀ،
ﻭﲰﺎﺀ ،ﻭ ﻣ ﹾﻞ َﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻼ ﹸﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼ ﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﴰ ﹺ
ﻀ ﻌﻔﺎﺀ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﳊ ّﹺﻖ ﻓﺄﻧﻌﻢ ﲟﺎ
ﺚ ﺍﻟ
ﻣﻠﺠﺄ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﺮﺍ ِﺀ ﻭ ﻣﻐﻴ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺑﻌﺪ:
ﻕ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫ ﹺﻞ
ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳ ﺰ ﹺﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺜﹰﺎ ﻣﺒﺘﹶﻠﻴ ﻦ ﺑ ﻔ ﺮ ﹴ
ﻕ ﺗﺒ ﻄ ﹸﻞ ﺍﻷﺩﻟ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤ ﹶﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ
ﺍﻟﻀﻼﻝ ،ﻭﱂ ﺗﺰﻝ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔ ﺮ
ﺖ
ﻛ ّﹺﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﻭﺗﻄﻌ ﻦ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺩﻻﻟ ﹰﺔ ﻭﻣﻌﲎ ،ﻭﺗﻤ ﻌ ﻦ ﰲ ﺭ ّﺩ ﺛﺎﺑـ
ﺖ
ﺚ ﺳﻨﺪﺍ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻨﺎ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﻮ ﺩ ﻋﻦ ﹶﻏﹺﻴّﻬـﺎ ،ﺇﺫ ﻛﺎﻧـ
ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳ
ﺨ ﺮ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟـﺪﻳ ﹺﻦ ﻣـﻦ
ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺳ
ﻉ ﻭﹺﺭ ﺩ ﹺﺭﹺﻳّﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻟﻜ ﻦ ﺍ َ
ﺍﻟﺒﺪ
ﻳﺪﺍﻓﻌﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﲔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊ ّﹺﻖ ﺇﱃ ﻳﻮ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣ ﺔ ﻇـﺎﻫﺮﻳﻦ،
-9-
ﻻ ﻳﻀﺮﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎ ﹸﻝ ﺍﳌﺒﻄﻠﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﺗﺄﻭﻳ ﹸﻞ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﲔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﻴﻞ
ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻷﺋﻤ ﺔ ﺍﳌﺘﻘ ﺪّﻣﲔ:
ﺏ
ﺏ ﻭ ﺣﺴﺎ
ﺚ ﺭﺟﺎ ﹲﻝ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮ ﹶﻥ ﺑ ﻪﻭﻟﻠﺪﻭﺍﻭﻳ ﹺﻦ ﹸﻛﺘﺎ
ﻭﻟﻠﺤﺪﻳ
ﻭﻣﻦ ﲨﻠ ﺔ ﺍﻷﺩﻟ ﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺴﺘ ﺪ ﱡﻝ ﺎ ﺃﻫ ﹸﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨ ﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﻮﺍ ﹺﺯ
ﻑ
ﺚ ﻳﻌﺮ
ﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﻓﺎﺗﻪ ،ﺣﺪﻳ ﹲ
ﻧﺪﺍ ِﺀ ﺍﻟﻨ ّﹺ
ﺚ
ﺚ " ﺧ ﺪ ﹺﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﹺﺟ ﹺﻞ" ﺃﻭ ﺣﺪﻳ
ﺚ "ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ" ﺃﻭ ﺣﺪﻳ
ﲝﺪﻳ
"ﻳﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ" ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺈﺳﻨﺎ ﺩ ﺻﺤﻴ ﹴﺢ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﹺﻪ "ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ" ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺳـﻔﻴﺎ ﹸﻥ
ﻕ – ﺃﻱ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ -ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟـﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑـ ﹺﻦ
ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﺕ ﹺﺭ ﺟ ﹸﻞ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋ ﻤ ﺮ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺭ ﺟ ﹲﻞ ﺍﺫ ﹸﻛﺮ
ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ) :ﺧ ﺪ ﺭ
ﻚ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ "ﻳﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ"(.
ﺱ ﺇﻟﻴ
ﹶﺃ ﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﹺ
ﺚ ﺻﺤﻴ ﺢ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎ ﺩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﺳﻨﺎ ﺩ ﰲ ﺻـﺤﻴ ﹺﺢ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺪﻳ ﹲ
ﺐ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺇﱃ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺭﺟ ﹴ
ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ :ﺃﺧﱪﻧﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺳـﻔﻴﺎﻥ
ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ.
- 10 -
ﻭﻣﻌﻨﺎﻩ :ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﲰﻌﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ
ﻋﻦ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ )ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ( ﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ .ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﺃﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ.
ﺚ ﺧ ﺪ ﹺﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﹺﺟ ﹺﻞ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ،ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴ ﹴﻢ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻹﻣـﺎ ﻡ
ﻓﺤﺪﻳ ﹸ
ﺍﻟﻔﻀ ﹸﻞ ﺑ ﻦ ﺩﻛﹶﲔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘ ﹸﺔ ﺍﳉﺒﻞﹸ ،ﻭﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹸﻥ ﺟﺰﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺜـﻮﺭﻱ
ﺐ ﺍﳌﺬﻫﺐﹺ ،ﻭﻋﺎﺩ ﹸﺓ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺃﰊ ﻧﻌـﻴﻢ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﺻﺎﺣ
ﻳﻤﻴ ﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﺎﻧﲔ ،ﻓﻴﻘﻮﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ )ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹸﻥ( ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ
ﻋﻴﻴﻨ ﹶﺔ )ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ( ﺃﻭ ﻳﺴﻤﻴﻪ )ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺑ ﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨ ﹶﺔ( ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﻗـﻊ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻋﺪ ﺓ ﻣﻮﺍﺿ ﻊ ﰲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻓﺤﻴﺚ ﻳﻄﻠـ ﻖ
ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹶﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ.
- 11 -
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻭﹶﺃﺑﻬﻢ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﹶﻛ ﻮﻛﻴـ ﹴﻊ
ﰊ ﻭﺃﰊ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳﺎ ّﹺ
ﻭﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣﻬﺪ ّﹴ
ﺕ
ﺴﺒﻜ ّﹺﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺎ
ﻆ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺍﻟ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺷﻴ ﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺆﺍ ﹴﻝ ﻭ ﺭﺩﻩ: ﺏ ﺍ ﳌ ﺰ ّﹺ
ﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﰲ ﺫﻛ ﹺﺮ ﺟﻮﺍ ﹺ
ﻱ
ﻕ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹸﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍ ﹺ
ﺺ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻭﻷﻧﻪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨـﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﺧ
ﺴﺒﻪ ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﹰﺓ ﻳﻨﺴﺒﻪ ﻭﺗﺎﺭﺓ ﻻ ﻳﻨـﺴﺒﻪ ﻳﻨ
ﲔ ﻻ ﻳﻨﺴﺒﻪ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺘﻔ ﻲ ﺑﻜﻮﹺﻧ ﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺷﻴ ﹴﺦ ﱂ ﻭﺣ
ﻳﺮ ﹺﻭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻓﻴﻜﺘﻔﻲ ﺑﺬﻟﻚ ﲤﻴﻴﺰﺍ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﻷﻛﺜ ﺮ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻳﻜﺘﻔ ﻲ ﺑﺸﻬﺮﺗﻪ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﺼﺎﺻﻪ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺟﺎﺭﻳـ ﹲﺔ ﰲ
ﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺳ ﻤﻴﻴﻦ ﺃﻭ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺳ ﻤﻴﺎﻥ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻏﺎﻟ ﹺ
ﻱ
ﺴ ﻤﻴﺎ ﻥ ﺍﻟﻘﹶﺮﻳﻨﺎ ﻥ ﻳﺸﺘﺮﻛﺎ ﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺧﺬ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﹶـﺮ ﹺﻭ ّﹺ
ﻭﺍﻟ
ﺡ ﺃﻭﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻳﺪ ﺭ ﻙ ﺑﺎﻟﺘـﺴﻤﻴ ﺔ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻻﺻـﻄﻼ ﹺ
ﺹ ﺃﻭ ﻣﻌﺮﻓ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍ ﺓ ﺍﳌﻜﺜﺮﻳﻦ ﻋـﻦ ﺃﺣـﺪﻫﻢ ﺩﻭ ﹶﻥ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﺼﺎ ﹺ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮﹺ ،ﻭﻣﺜ ﹸﻞ ﻗﻮﻟﻬﻤﺎ ﺗﻔﺼﻴ ﹸﻞ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔـﺘﺢ
- 12 -
ﻼ ﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗ ﻪ:
ﻭﻻ ﺑﺄﺱ ﺑﺈﻳﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻛﺎﻣ ﹰ
- 13 -
ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ )ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ( ﻓﺤﺬﻑ ﻟﻔﻆ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻟـﻪ
ﺃﹸﺭﺍﻩ ﻭﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﻭﺃﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﻀﻢ ﺍﳍﻤﺰﺓ ﺃﻱ ﺃﻇﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴ ﹴﻢ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻦ
ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺶ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﻴﺎﻧﲔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻤـﺶ ،ﻟﻜـﻦ ﺳـﻔﻴﺎ ﹶﻥ
ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮ ﺭ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﺟﺰﻣﺎ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺖ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻴ ﺰ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳌﹸﻬ ﻤﻠﹶﲔ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹸﻥ ﻭﺍﷲ
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭﺃﻳ
ﺍﳌﻮﻓﻖ.
ﺏﻱ ﻧﻔـﺴِﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩ ﹺ ﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ّﹺ ﻭﻣﺜﺎ ﹸﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻃﻼ ﹺ
ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﻗﻮﻟﹸﻪ :ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﻋـﻦ
ﻋﻄﺎﺀ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺋﺐ ....ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚﹶ ،ﻭﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﻟﻌﺒـﺪﻱ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺷﻴ ﺦ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ
ﺐ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻭﻻ ﺬﻳﺒﻪ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺬﻳ ﹺ
ﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺷـﻒ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮ ﹺ
ﷲ ﳏﻤ ﺪ ﺑـﻦﱐ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍ ِﺴﻤﻌﺎ ﱡ
ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍ ﻥ ﻭﻻ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﹺﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟ
ﻱ ﻭﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ
ﻛﺜ ﹴﲑ ﺍﻟ ﻌﺒﺪﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺛﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮﺓ ﲰﻊ ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭ
ﷲ ﺑ ﻦ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻙ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰﳊﺠﺎﺝ ﻭﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴ ﹶﻞ ﻭﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍ ِ
ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺍ ﹶ
- 14 -
ﻭﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻟﻠﺤﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﻟﻌﻴﲏ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳏﻤ ﺪ ﺑ ﻦ ﻛﺜ ﹴﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺑﻦ
ﻒ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺮﺡ ﺍﻟﻘـﺴﻄﻼﱐ ﰲ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻓﻮﻫﻢ ﺃﻭ ﲢﺮﻳ
ﺇﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻐﲑﻩ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﺜـﻮﺭﻱ ﺑﻌﻴﻨـﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺿـﻌﲔ،
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺟﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﻨـﻪ ﰲ
ﻱ
ﻱ ﺍﻟﺒﺼﺮ ﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺪ
ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺮﻳﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ :ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍ ِ
ﻱ ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻤﺶ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺝ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭ ّﹺ
ﺃﺧﻮ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺃﺧﺮ
ﻓﺎﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭ ﹸﺓ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻓﺈﺎ "ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻭﺷـﻌﺒﺔ" ﺃﻭ "ﻋـﻦ
ﺏ ﺍﻷﻭ ﹸﻝ ﻹﺭﺍﺩﺗ ﻪ ﺫﻛ ﺮ ﺍﻟﺜـﺎﱐ
ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺶ" ﻭﺍﻷﻗﺮ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ .ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﷲ ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﻮﻥ.
ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ :ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﹶﻗﺒﻴﺼ ﹸﺔ ﻗـﺎﻝ
ﱀ ....ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹸﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻬﻴ ﹺﻞ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺻﺎ ﹴ
ﻱ
ﻓﻘﺒﻴﺼ ﹸﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﱂ ﺗﺬﻛﹶﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﺜـﻮﺭ ّﹺ
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﻐﲑﺍ ﺟﺪﺍ.
ﲔ ﻭﻳﺮﻳ ﺪ
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻄﻠﻘﻪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴ ﹴﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﻀ ﹸﻞ ﺑﻦ ﺩ ﹶﻛ ﹴ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ،ﻭﰲ ﻛ ّﹺﻞ ﺣﺎ ﹴﻝ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺒ ﹶﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴ ﹶﻞ ﻋ ﹺﻦ
ﻁ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻃﻠ ﹲﺔ ﰲ ﻛ ّﹺﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ. ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ﻓﺪﻋﻮﻯ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ
- 15 -
ﺕ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻪ ﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋـﺪ ﺓ
ﺏ ﻭﺍﺳ ﻊ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺮ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺴﻤﺎ ﻟﻠﺒﺎﺏ.
ﻭ ﺣ
- 16 -
ﲔ ﻣﻦ ﻇﹸﻠﻤﻬﻢ ﻳﺘﻤﺴﻜﻮﻥ ﺑﻜ ّﹺﻞ ﻃﻌ ﹴﻦ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺍﻓـ ﻖ
ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔ
ﷲ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣﺔ.
ﻣﺸ ﺮﺑﻬﻢ ﻧﺴﺄ ﹸﻝ ﺍ َ
ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺼ ﹸﺔ ﺻﺤﻴﺤ ﹰﺔ ﻭﻳﻈﻬ ﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻋـﺎﻙ
ﷲ ﺑﻘﻠﻴ ﹴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻤ ﻌ ﹺﻦ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﺳﺄﻗﻮﻟﹸﻪ:
ﺍُ
ﻱ ﻫﻲ
ﲔ ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﺍﻟ ﺪﻭ ﹺﺭ ّﹺ
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭ ﹸﺓ ﲝﺮﻭﻓﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﹺﺦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣ ﻌ ﹴ
ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ:
ﺕ
ﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮ ﻭﻭﻧﻪ )ﺧـ ﺪ ﺭ
ﲰﻌﺖ ﳛﲕ ﻳﻘﻮ ﹸﻝ :ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﹸ
ﻕ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟـﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑـ ﹺﻦ ﹺﺭ ﺟ ﹸﻞ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤ ﺮ( ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﺳﻌ ﺪ.
ﻗﻴﻞ ﻟﻴﺤﲕ :ﻣﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻻ ﺃﺩﺭﻱ
ﺱ ﺳﻌﻴ ﺪ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻌ ﺪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎ
ﺷ
ﻓﻬﺎﺗﺎﻥ ﲨﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﱠﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴ ﹸﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﺄﻧ ﹶﻔ ﹲﺔ ﻻ ﺗﻌﱡﻠ ﻖ ﳍـﺎ
ﺑﺎﻷُﻭﱃ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮ ﺩ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﻣـﻮﱃ
ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫ ﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳ ﹺﺦ ﻓﻈﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪﺍ
ﻓﺠﻤﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺗﲔ ﻭﺩﻟﻴﻠﹸﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﱄ:
ﺖ ﻓﻌﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ
ﲔ :ﻗﻠ
ﻗﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻣ ّﹺﻲ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﹺﺦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣﻌ ﹴ
- 17 -
ﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﺍ ﹶﳌ ﺪﹺﻧﻲ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻭﻫ ﹴ
ﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ:
ﻻ ﺃﻋﺮﻓﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﻣ ﹺﻞ :ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑـ ﻦ ﺳـﻌ ﺪ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋ ﺪ ّﹴ
ﺍﳌﻘﻌ ﺪ ﻣﺪﻳﲏ
ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻠ ّﹴﻲ ﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺜﻤﺎ ﹸﻥ ﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌﻴ ﺪ )ﺍﻟـﺪﺍﺭﻣﻲ(
ﲔ :ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻨـﻪ
ﺖ :ﻟﻴﺤﲕ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣﻌ ﹴ
ﻗﻠ
ﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻟﹸﻪ؟ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻻ ﺃﻋﺮﻓﻪ.
ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻭﻫ ﹴ
ﻱ – ﻓﻘــﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﺑــ ﹺﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺸـﻴﺦ – ﺃﻱ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻋﺪ ّﹴ
ﲔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟـﺤﻜﺎﻳ ﺔ ﺇ ﹼﻥ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑـ ﻦ ﺳـﻌ ﺪ ﻻ ﻣ ـﻌ ﹴ
ﺐﲔ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻭﻫ ﹴ ﺃﻋﺮﻓﻪ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻣﻌ ﹴ
ﺐ ﻓﻨﻌﻢ ،ﻭﺇ ﹾﻥ ﻛﺎ ﹶﻥ ﻗﻮﻟﹸﻪ ﻳﺮﻭﻱﺃﻱ ﺃﻥ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹶﻪ ﻳﺮﻭﻳﻪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻭﻫ ﹴ
ﺐ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻓﻼ ﺷﻰ َﺀ ﻷﻥ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺳـﻌ ﺪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻭﻫ ﹴ
ﻱ ﻭﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹶﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼ ﻡ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﺪﻱ، ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮ
ﺐ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﺔ.ﻱ ﻋﻨ ﻪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻭﻫ ﹴ ﺚ ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮ ّﹺ
ﺃﻱ ﻭﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﺣﺪﻳ ﹶ
- 18 -
ﺑﲏ ﳐﺰﻭﻡ ....ﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻣﻲ ﻋﻦ ﳛﲕ ﺑﻦ
ﻣﻌﲔ ﻻ ﺃﻋﺮﻓﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﲔ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭ ﳜ ﻪ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ ﻭﻫـﻢ
ﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣﻌ ﹴﻓﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ّﹺ
ﻂ ﻷﻣﻮ ﹴﺭ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ:ﻭﻋﺪ ﻡ ﺿﺒ
ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻣﻲ ﺳﺄﻟﹶﻪ ﺑﻨﻔﺴِﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑـ ﹺﻦ ﺳـﻌ ﺪ
ﻱ ﻳﻨﻘﹸﻞ ﺑـﺪﻟﻴ ﹺﻞ ﻗﻮﻟـﻪ) :ﻗﻴـﻞ ﲏ ،ﺑﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ﺍﳌﻘﻌ ﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﻳ ّﹺ
ﺕ ﲰﺎ ﻋ ﻪ ﳍﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻟـﻮ ﻛـﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺤﲕ( ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴ ﹸﻞ ﻋﺪ ﹺﻡ ﺛﺒﻮ
ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻌﺮﻑ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﳌﻘﻌ ﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﲏ ،ﻓﺎﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﺮﻑ ﺑﻌـ ﺪ
ﲔ ﺳﺌ ﹶﻞ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﻓﻈﻨﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻣﻌ ﹴ
ﻒ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎ ُﺀ
ﻓﺠﻤﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﰲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﱠﻟ
ﲔ ﻣﺘﻌ ّﺪﺩﻳﻦ ﻓـﺄﻛﺜ ﺮ ﰲ ﺃﻭﻫﺎﻡ ﺍﳉﻤ ﹺﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﻱ ﺍﳉﻤ ﹺﻊ ﺑ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻔﺮﻳ ﹺﻖ ﺑﲔ ﻭﺍﺣ ﺪ ﲜﻌﻠ ﻪ ﺃﻛﺜ ﺮ.
ﻚ ﺍﻟﻌﺒـﺎﺱ
ﲰ ﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣ ﺮ )ﺷ
ﻱﰲﺍ ﻚ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭ ّﹺ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺷ
ﻂ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺌﻠﺔ.ﺳﻌﻴ ﺪ ﺃﻡ ﺳﻌ ﺪ( ﺩﻟﻴ ﹲﻞ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺪ ﹺﻡ ﺿﺒ
ﲔ ﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤ ﺮ ﺑﺪﻟﻴ ﹺﻞ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ:ﻭ ﻣﻔﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﺮﻓ ﹸﺔ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣﻌ ﹴ
ﺕ ﹺﺭ ﺟ ﹸﻞ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤ ﺮ( ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺑـﻮ
ﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺮ ﻭﻭﻧﻪ ) ﺧ ﺪ ﺭ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﹸ
- 19 -
ﻕ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺩﻟﻴ ﹸﻞ ﻣﻌﺮﻓـ ﺔ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﳊﻘﹶﺖ ﺎ ﺗﻠﻚ ﷲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺎ ﹸﻥ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻫ ﻢ ﻓﹸﺄ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻜ ﻦ ﻭﺍ ُ
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭ ﹸﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺇﳕﺎ ﰲ ﺣ ّﹺﻖ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﺍﳌﻘﻌ ﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﲏ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺃﺑـﻮ
ﺝ.
ﺣﻤﻴ ﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﺮ
- 20 -
ﲔ ﻳﻮﺭ ﺩ ﺍﺣﺘﻤـﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺃﻥ
ﺏ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣ ﻌ ﹴ
ﻣﻮﱃ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺟﻮﺍ
ﻕ ﻗﻮ ﹶﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ،ﺭﺍﺟﻊ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻳﺼ ّﺪ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺪﻭﺭﻱ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻑ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﻳﺪ،
ﻉ ﺑﺈﺷﺮﺍ
ﺏ ﻣﻄﺒﻮ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ
ﻭﻫﻢ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻳﻜﹺﺒّﺮﻭ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻷﲰﺎ َﺀ ﺣﱴ ﻛﺄﻧﻚ ﺗﻈ ﻦ ﺃﻧـﻚ ﺃﻣـﺎ ﻡ
ﻱ.
ﺷﻴ ﹺﺦ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ّﹺ
ﺝ
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﶈ ّﻘ ﻖ ﻏ ﲑ ﳏ ّﻘ ﹴﻖ ﻭﻛﺄﻧﻪ ﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﳜﺮ
ﻣﻦ ﺭﺃﺳﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺧﻠﻂ ﲣﻠﻴﻄﹰﺎ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﺎ ﻓﺎﺿﺤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻛﺪﺗﻪ
ﻟﻚ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻋﺎ ﻙ ﺍﷲ ،ﻓﺈﻢ ﳛ ﹺﺮّﻓﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﺰ ﹺﻭّﺭﻭ ﹶﻥ ﻋ ﻤﺪﺍ ﻭﺧﻄﹰﺄ ﻟ ﻘﹼﻠ ﺔ
ﷲ ﻣﻦ ﺟﻬﻠﻬـﻢ، ﺻﺪﻗﻬﻢ ﻭﺣ ﻈّﻬﻢ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ،ﺃﺭﺍﺣﻨﺎ ﺍ ُ
ﻒ
ﻂ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻜﺬﺏ ،ﻓﻜﻴ ﻓﻤﺜﻞﹸ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌﻠ ﹺﻖ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻳﻬﺬﻱ ﻭﺍﺧﺘﻠ ﹶ
ﱐ ﰒ ﺧﺘﻤﻬـﺎ ﺟﻌ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛ ﹶﺔ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ،ﻓﺠﺎ َﺀ ﺑﺎﻷﻭ ﹺﻝ ﻭﺟﻌﻠﹶﻪ ﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﹶ
ﺑﻌﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩﻧﺎ ﻓﺠﻤ ﻊ ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﺑﻴﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓـﺼﺎﺭ
ﺏ
ﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺎ ﹺ ﻚ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳌﺸﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﻞ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻀﺤ
ﻚ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺷﺮﺍﻑ، )ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﻳﺪ( ﻗﺪ ﺃﻫﻠ
ﻒ
ﻳﻈ ﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻌّﻠ ﻖ ﺯﺧﺮﻓ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﻼ ﹺﻡ ﻏ ﲑ ﻣﻜﺸﻮﻓﺔ ،ﻭﻳـﺴﺘﺨ
ﺑﺄﻫ ﹺﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ﹺﻢ ﻭﺃﻋﻤﺎﺭﹺﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﻀﻮﻫﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻗﻴ ﹺﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﻘﻴـﻖﹺ،
- 21 -
ﻒ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻠﻤـﺎ ِﺀ
ﺨ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﺒﺎﺭﻙ ) :ﻣ ﹺﻦ ﺍﺳﺘ
ﺖ ﺀﺍ ﺧ ﺮﺗﻪ( ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴﺎﺫ ﺑﺎﷲ ،ﻓﻌﺠﺒﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺷ ﺪ ﺟﺮﺃﺗﻪ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺫﻫﺒ
ﺍﻟﻜﺬﺏ ،ﻧﺴﺄ ﹸﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣ ﹶﺔ ﻭﺣﺴ ﻦ ﺍﳋﺘﺎﻡ.
ﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﺮﻳ ﹺﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺌﻠ ﺔ ﺑﻔﻀﻠ ﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻭﻛﺮﻣﻪ ﻭﺍﳊﻤ ﺪ ِ
ﷲ
ﺖ ﻭﹶﻟﻜـ ﻦ ﺍ َ
ﺖ ﹺﺇ ﹾﺫ ﺭ ﻣﻴـ
ﺗﺒﺎﺭ ﻙ ﻛ ﱡﻞ ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ ﲞﻠ ﻘ ﻪ ) ﻭﻣﺎ ﺭ ﻣﻴ
ﺭﻣﻰ(.
- 22 -
ﺍﻟﻨﻘ ﹶﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﰲ ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺑﺄ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣ ﹶﺔ ﻣﻐﻠﻄﺎﻱ ﲢﺼ ﹸﻞ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻭﻫﺎ ﻡ ﻭﺍﺑـ ﻦ
ﺕ ﻫﻴﻬﺎﺕ ،ﻧﻌﻢ ﻗﺪ ﳚﺪ ﺍﳌﺨـﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﻬﻴﻬﺎ
ﻆ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻓﻠـﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﰲ ﻣﺸﺎ ﳜﻬﹺﻢ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟ ﻌﹶﻠ ﻢ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﺑﺬﺍﻙ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﻓ ﹺﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻘّﻠ ﺪ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﻰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴ ﹸﻞ ﻋﻠﻴ ﻪ ﻗﻮﻟﹸﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣ ﺔ
ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ:
ﺏ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ
ﺏ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼ ﹺﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺘﺎ ﹺ
ﺖ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ ﹺ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻔﻌ
ﺐ
ﲨ ﻌﻪ ﺍ ِﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﻣ ﹸﺔ ﻋﻼ ُﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻳ ﹺﻦ ﻣﻐﻠﻄﺎﻱ ﻋﻠـﻰ ـﺬﻳ ﹺ
ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎ ﹺﻝ ﻣﻊ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ ﳑـﺎ ﻳﻨﻘﻠﹸـﻪ ﻭﺇﳕـﺎ
ﺖ ﺍﻷﺻﻮ ﹶﻝ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻋﺰﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻘ ﹶﻞ
ﺖ ﺑﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺟﻠ ﺔ ﻭﻛﺸﻔ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻨ
ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺟﻠﺔ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻭﺍﻓﻖ ﹶﺃﺛﺒﺘ ﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳ ﻦ ﹶﺃ ﻫ ﻤﻠﺘﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺍﺪﻣﺖ ﺷﺒﻬﺘﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺎﻃ ﹺﻞ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎ ﻥ ﻣـﻦ ﺷـﻴ ﹺﺦ
ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮﹴ ،ﹶﻟﻴﺘﻬﻢ ﻳﻔﻘﻬﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻭﻳﻌﺘﺮﻓﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻭﻟﻮ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻮ ﺓ
ﺱ
ﺶ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﹺ
ﺲ ﻣﻨﺎ ،ﻭﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺍﻟ ﺪّﻳ ﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﹺﻨ ﺪ ﺇﱃ ﻏ ّﹺ
ﺸﻨﺎ ﻓﻠﻴ
ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻏ
ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊ ّﹺﻖ ﻭﺍﳍﺪﻯ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎ ﺓ.
ﻁ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﹲﺓ ﻣﺎ ﻋ ﹺﻬﺪﺕ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ
ﷲ ﺷﺮﻭ ﹲ
ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻭﺍ ِ
- 23 -
ﻱ
ﻁ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻮّﺛ ﻖ ﺍﻟـﺮﺍﻭ
ﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳ ﹺﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞﹸ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﳌﺸﺘ ﺮ ﹸ
ﻭﺍﳉﺮ ﹺ
ﻉ
ﻁ ﳐﺘـ ﺮ
ﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟـﺸﺮ ﹸ ﺏ ﺍﳉﺮ ﹺ ﻑ ﺑﺄﺳﺒﺎ ﹺﻋﺎ ﹺﺭ
ﷲ ﺍﻟﺮ ﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻷﻧـﻪ ﺤ ﻖ ﻭﺍ ِ ﺙ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺎ ﻡ ﻟﻪ ﻭﺯ ﹲﻥ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺴﺘ
ﺤ ﺪ ﹲ
ﻣ
ﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌـﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻁ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺬﺍﺟﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺍﳋﻮ ﻏﺎﻳ ﹲﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﻮ
ﻑ
ﻣﻦ ﺗﺸﻮﻳﺸﻬﻢ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﹶﺃ ﻭﻟﹶﻰ ﺑﺎﻹﳘﺎﻝ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻛ ّﹴﻞ ﺗـﺼ ﺮ
ﻑ ﻭﻳﻨﺎﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻣﺜﺎﻟﹸﻪ:
ﻅ ﻣﻌﺮﻭ ﺍﳊﻔﹼﺎ
ﻆ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﳊ ّﹺﻖ ﺍﻹﺷـﺒﻴﻠ ﻲ ﰲ )ﺃﺑﻮ ﹶﻛﺒﺸ ﹶﺔ( ﱂ ﻳﻌ ﹺﺮﻓﹾﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﻆ ﺍﻟﻜﺒ ﲑ ﺍﺑ ﻦ
ﺃﺣﻜﺎﻣﻪ ﻭﺑﻨﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﻪ ﳎﻬﻮ ﹲﻝ ﻓ ﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﺍﻟﻘﻄﹼﺎﻥ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ:
ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﺛ ﹶﻘ ﹲﺔ ﻭﺛﹼ ﹶﻘ ﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﹸﻮ ﻓﻲ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑﻨﻪ ،ﺫﻛـﺮﻩ
ﺍﳌﻨﺘﺠﺎﱄ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﺃﻗﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺗﺘﺒﻌﺎﺗﻪ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻜﻮﰲ ﻫﻮ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﺑ ﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ
ﻅ ﻟﻪ ﺗـﺎﺭﻳ ﺦ ﻛـﺒ ﲑ ﰲ ﳊﻔﱠﺎ
ﷲ ﺍﻟ ﻌﺠﻠﻲ ،ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺘﺠﺎﱄ ﻣﻦ ﺍ ﹸ ﺍِ
ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎ ﹺﻝ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ.
- 25 -
ﻭﻣﺜ ﹸﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻘﹸﻬﻢ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ "ﺛﻘﺔ" ﻭ"ﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﻓﻼﻥ" ﺣﻴﺚ
ﻧﺴﺒﻮﺍ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ ﻳ ﻔ ﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻬ ﺪﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻘﻮﻳ ﹸﻞ
ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻣﺎ ﱂ ﻳ ﹸﻘﻞ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﻛﺜ ﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻛﺮ "ﻫﻮ ﺛﻘـ ﹲﺔ ﻭﺛﹼﻘـﻪ
ﻓﻼﻥ" ﰲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻓﻔﻲ ﺗﻌﺠﻴﻞ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﻌ ﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ
ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌﺎﱐ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺛﻘﺔ ﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﳛﲕ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻘﹶﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻢ ﻗﺒﻠﻪ ﻭﺛﻘﻮﻩ ،ﻓﻤﻦ
ﺃﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﺀﻭﺍ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﺓ ﺍﳉﺪﻳﺪﺓ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍ ﳌﺰﻱ ﰲ ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴـﻊ ﺑـﻦ
ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﺍﳊﻨﻔﻲ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﺛﻘﺔ ﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻭﳛـﲕ ﺑـﻦ
ﻣﻌﲔ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﱯ ﻟﻜﻼﻣﻪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﹺﻪ "ﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﻴﺎ ﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﺇﻗﺮﺍ ﺭ ﺍﻟﺬﻫ ّﹺ
ﺍﻟﻮﻫ ﹺﻢ ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻬﺎ ﹺﻡ" ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﱡﻪ ﺻﻨﻴ ﻊ ﺍﳊﻔﱠﺎﻅ ﻭﻟﻦ ﲡ ﺪ ﺃﺣـﺪﺍ
ﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳ ﹺﻞ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ "ﺛﻘﺔ" ﻭﺑﲔ ﻗﻮﻟﻪﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ِﺀ ﺍﳉﺮ ﹺ
ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ "ﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﻓﻼﻥ".
ﻱ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺣﻜـﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺑﻌﺔ :ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺭﺍ ﻙ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺰ ّﹺ
ﺖ :ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ
ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻪ "ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ" ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﻠ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﺛﻘﺔ.
- 26 -
ﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺓ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻘﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍ ﺩ
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻧ
ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺒﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﻮﺛﻴﻖ.
ﻁ ﻗﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﳏﺎﻭﻟ ﺔ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ :ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﲟﺎ ﻣ ﺮ ﺳﻘﻮ ﹸ
ﻟﻠﺘﺸﻜﻴﻚ ﺑﺘﻮﺛﻴﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﻟﻪ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﺧﺸﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﹶﻪ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻟﹸﻪ "ﺃﺧﺸﻰ" ﺩﻟﻴ ﹸﻞ
ﻒ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﳏﺎﻭﻟ ﹲﺔ ﻻ ﻭﺯ ﹶﻥ ﳍﺎ ﻛﺎﻟﺬﻱ ﳛـﺎﻭ ﹸﻝ ﺇﺯﺍﻟـ ﹶﺔ ﺿﻌ
ﻒ ﺍﻟﺸﻚ ﻭﻫﻴﻬﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﳐﻄﺌﹰﺎ ﲔ ﺑﺄﺿﻌ ﺍﻟﻴﻘ ﹺ
ﺖ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭ ﹶﺓ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻏﺎﻳـ ﹲﺔ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﺳﺎﻫﻴﺎ ﳌﺎ ﻛﺮﺭ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠ
ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻗﻴ ﹺﻖ ﻷﻧ ﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﱐ ﻣﻮﱃ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺛﻘ ﹲﺔ ﻣـﻦﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﺍﳌﺪ ُﹺ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ ،ﻭﳛﺘﻤﻞ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ.
)ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ ﻭﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﻪ( ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺳـﻌﺪ
ﺝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﻤﻴﺪ ﺍﳌﺪﱐ ﺍﳌﻘﻌﺪ ﻣﻮﱃ ﺑـﲏ ﳐـﺰﻭ ﹴﻡ ﻭﺛﻘـﻪ ﺍﻷﻋﺮ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ.
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ ﻣﻮﱃ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻛﻮﰲ
ﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
- 27 -
ﲔ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﲏ ﻣﻮﱃ ﺑﲏ ﹾﳐﺰﻭ ﹴﻡ ﻭﺑـﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷـ ّﹺﻲ ﻓﺸﺘﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺑ
ﰲ ﻣﻮﱃ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻮ ّﹺ
ﻟﻘﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺳﺎﺑ ﻘ ﻪ "ﻭﻟﻌﻠﱠﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ" ﻓـﺪ ﱠﻝ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻒ ﻳﺮﻳ ﺪ ﺃﻥ ﳚﻌ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛ ﹶﺔ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪﺍ
ﲢﻘﻴ ﻘﻪ ،ﺇﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟ
ﻭﺍﷲ ﺣﺴﻴﺒﻪ.
ﹸﺛ ﻢ ﺃﱂ ﻳﻮّﺛ ﹾﻘ ﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺛﹼﻘﻪ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻡ ﻣﻌﺘﺒ ﺮ ﻣﺘـﺸ ّﺪﺩ،
ﻑ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ.
ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﻐﻀﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﻄﺮ
ﺼﻔﹰﺎ ﳏﺎﻓﻈﹰﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻣﺎﻧ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﻴﺔ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋ ﹸﻞ ﻣﻨ
ﺍﻟﱵ ﺳﻴﺴﺄ ﹸﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻮ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣ ﺔ ﹶﻟﻤﺎ ﻓﺎﺗﻪ ﺃﻥ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﺗﻌﻤـ ﺪ
ﺖ"
ﺍﻻﺳﺘﺪﺭﺍ ﻙ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍ ﳌ ﹺﺰّﻱ ﰲ ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻗﻠـ
ﻭﳌﺎ ﻛﺮﺭ ﺣﻜﺎﻳ ﹶﺔ ﺗﻮﺛﻴ ﹺﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ.
ﻓﺎﺋﺪ ﹲﺓ :ﻗﺪ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻗﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﻆ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹺﺮ ﰲ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ
ﺐ ﻋﻠﻴ ﻪ ﰲ "ﲢﺮﻳﺮ
ﻼ ﺑﺪﻭ ﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﺭﺍ ﻙ ﺃﻭ ﺗﻌﻘﻴ ﹴﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﻣﻬ ﻤ ﹰ
ﰲ
ﺐ" :ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷ ﻲ ﺍﻟﻜـﻮ ﱡ
ﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳ ﹺ ﺗﻘﺮﻳ ﹺ
ﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺗـﺄﻟﻴﻒ ﺑـﺸﺎﺭ ﻋـﻮﺍﺩ ﻭﺛﱠﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋ ﻲ .ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ
ﺼﻠﹸﲏ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺑ ﹲﺔ -ﻭﺷﻌﻴﺐ ﺍﻷﺭﻧـﺆﻭﻁ – ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ – ﻭﻻ ﺗ
ﺐ ﺍﻷﻟﺒـﺎﱐ -ﻣـﻊ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻏﲑ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺩﺭ ﺃﺭﻧﺎﺅﻭﻁ ﺻﺎﺣ ﹺ
- 28 -
ﺃﺧﻄﺎ ٍﺀ ﻓﻴﻪ ﱂ ﺃﺗﺘﺒﻌﻬﺎ ﻛﻠﱠﻬﺎ – ﻭﺍﳊ ﻖ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ – ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺎﺋـﺪ ﹸﺓ
ﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻨـﺎ ِﺀ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻘ ﹺﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻗﻮﺍ ﹺﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎ ِﺀ ﻭﺗﻘﺮﻳ ﹺ
ﺍﻟﺒﺤﺚ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻛﻼ ﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﳛﺘﺎﺝ ﺇﱃ ﲢﺮﻳـ ﹴﺮ ﻭﺃﺭﻯ ﰲ
ﺕ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻼ ﻭﺍﺳﺘﺪﺭﺍﻛﺎ ﻑ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﲢﺎﻣ ﹰ ﺏ ﻋﺪ ﻡ ﺇﻧﺼﺎ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ ﹺ
ﺖ ﲡﻌﻠﹸـﻚ ﺖ ﺃﻡ ﹶﺃﺑﻴ
ﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﺷﺌ ﺃﻣ ﹺﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨ
ﺚﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻜﻤﻪ ﺟﺮﺣﺎ ﻭﺗﻌﺪﻳﻼﹰ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺮﺩﻭ ﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﹸ ﰲﺷ
ﺕ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣـﺎ ﻳﻨﻜﹶـ ﺮ ﺏ ﺗﺸﻮﺑ ﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍ
ﺍﻹﲨﺎﻝﹸ ،ﻭﻣﻘ ّﺪ ﻣ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ ﹺ
ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﻗﺪ ﻻ ﻳﻼ ﺣﻈﹸﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﺾ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ.
ﺼ ﺮ ﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ:
ﻣﺜﺎ ﹲﻝ ﳐﺘ
ﻆ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺿﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺷﺪﺍﺩ :ﻛﻮﰲ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ.
ﺏ :ﺑﻞ ﳎﻬﻮ ﹲﻝ ﺗﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ
ﻑ ﺍﻹﺿﺮﺍ ﹺ
ﻓﻘﺎﻻ ﲝﺮ
ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﻋﺒﻴ ﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﻌﻲ ،ﻭﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﻭﺣـﺪﻩ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ ،ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺃﺩﺧﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
- 29 -
ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺣ ﺪ ﻭﹸﻗﹺﺒﻠﹶﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻻﻋﺘﺒﺎ ﹴﺭ ﺀﺍﺧﺮ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ:
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺳﺔ :ﻣﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳـﺚ ﺇﻻ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﻴـﻞ ،ﻭﱂ
ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺘ ﺮ ﻙ ﺣﺪﻳﹸﺜﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺟﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻻﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻠﻔـﻆ:
ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ،ﺣﻴﺚ ﻳﺘﺎﺑﻊ ﻭﺇﻻ ﻓﹶﻠّﹺﻴ ﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ.
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺳﻌﺔ :ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺮ ﹺﻭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻏ ﲑ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻭﱂ ﻳ ﻮﺛﱠﻖ،
ﻭﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺍﻹﺷﺎﺭﺓ ﺑﻠﻔﻆ ﳎﻬﻮﻝ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺝ ﻟﻪ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻪ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺘﻮﺛﻴﻖ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﳐﺮ
ﺽ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ.
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺸﻰ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﹶﻭﻓﹶﻰ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻌﻼ ﻡ ﺍﻻﻋﺘﺮﺍ
ﺐ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ،ﻭﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﻃﹼﺄ ﺏ ﻛﺜ ﲑ ﰲ ﻛﺘ ﹺ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺆﻻ ِﺀ ﺿﺮ
ﺤﺤﻮﺍ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺜﹶﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﻞ ﺧﻔ ﻲ ﺻ ﻏ ﲑ ﻭﺍﺣ ﺪ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻟﻠﻨﺴﺎﺋ ّﹺﻲ ﻭ
ﻱ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻊ ﺳﻜﻮﺗﻪ ،ﰒ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣـﺎ ﹴﰎ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﺫﻛ ﺮ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ّﹺ
ﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳ ﹺﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺳﻜﻮﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻧﺎﻓ ﻊ ﻟﻪ ﺑﻼ ﺷـﻚ ،ﰒ ﺍﳉﺮ ﹺ
ﱯ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺗـﺼﺤﻴ ﹺﺢ ﺗﺼﺤﻴ ﺢ ﺍﳊﺎﻛ ﹺﻢ ﳊﺪﻳﺜ ﻪ ﰒ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻫ ّﹺ
ﱯ ﻧﻔﺴِﻪﻱ ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻫ ﹺ
ﺕ ﺍﳌ ﺰ ّﹺﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ) :ﺻﺤﻴﺢ( ،ﰒ ﺳﻜﻮ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺷﻒ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺛﻴ ﹺﻖ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ،ﻓﻸﻱ ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺿـﺎ
- 30 -
ﺤ ﹺﺮّﻳ ﻪ ﻭﻫـﻲ
ﻆ ﺮ ﺩ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ" :ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ" ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺗ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﻋﺒﺎﺭ ﹸﺓ ﺗﻌﺪﻳ ﹴﻞ ﺧﻔﻴﻔ ﹲﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻻ ﳜﻔﹶﻰ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﻯ ﺑﻐﲑﹺﻩ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻗﺒﻠﹶﻪ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﻫ ﹶﻞ ﻟﻮﱠﺛﻘﹶﻪ.
ﻒ ﺇﻟﻴ ﻪ ﻗﻮ ﹶﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﺎﻭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺿﻴ ﹺﺢ ﺍﻷﺑﻬﺮ ﺿ
ﻭﺃ
ﺷﺎﺭﺣﺎ ﻛﻼ ﻡ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺍﳌﻠ ّﻘ ﹺﻦ ﰲ ﻣﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺮ ﹺﻭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻭﺍﺣـ ﺪ ﻣـﺎ
ﻧﺼﻪ:
ﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺒ ﹸﺔ ﻗـﻮ ﹸﻝﻭﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑ ﺔ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﻣﻤﺎ ﺗﺜﺒ
ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌ ّﹺﻲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ،ﻭﰲ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﻋﺪ ﻡ ﺯﻭﺍ ﹺﻝ ﺟﻬﺎﻟ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻋﻨﻪ،
ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺎ ﺭ ﺧﻼﻓﹶﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻓﻘﹶﺒﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﻷﺋﻤ ﺔ ﻟﻪ "ﻭﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﻤﺪ ﹸﺓ" ﺷﻰ ٌﺀ ﺯﺍﺋ ﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍ ﺩ
ﺤ ﺢ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﻛ ﻢ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹶﻪ ﻭﻭﺍﻓﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﺭﺍ ﹴﻭ ﻭﺍﺣ ﺪ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻ
ﻟﻤﺎ ﻇ ﻬ ﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺒ ﻄ ﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ:
ﻱ ﺑ ﻦ ﺧﺰﳝ ﹶﺔ ﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﻤـ ﺮ
ﺴ ّﹺﺮ
ﱀ ﺛﻨﺎ ﺍﻟ
ﺃﺧﱪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤ ﺪ ﺑ ﻦ ﺻﺎ ﹴ
ﺙ ﺛﻨﺎ ﺃﰊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻋـﻦ ﺺ ﺑﻦ ﻏﻴﺎ
ﺑ ﻦ ﺣﻔ ﹺ
ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺷﺪﺍﺩ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻳﺰﻳ ﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﺘﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ :
ﺚ
ﲰﻌﺖ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ...ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﹶ
- 31 -
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺣﺪﺛﹶﻨﺎﻩ ﻋﻠ ﻲ ﺑﻦ ﲪﺸﺎ ﺩ ﺍﻟﻌﺪﻝ ﺛﻨﺎ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴﻞ ﺑﻦ
ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺮﺯﻭﻕ ﺃﻧﺎ ﺷـﻌﺒﺔ ﺃﺧـﱪﱐ
ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻛﻬﻴﻞ ﻋﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻳﺰﻳﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻴﻪ
ﺚ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺷﺘﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﺎﻥ .....ﺍﳊـﺪﻳ ﹶ
ﳓﻮﻩ.
ﺐ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺭﺟ ﹲﻞ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﻜﺜﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻮﺟـ ﺪ ﰲ ﻛﺘـ ﹺ
ﻂ ﻓﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﺨﺸﻰ
ﻀﺒ ﹶ
ﺙﻓ
ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎ ﹺﻝ ﺭﺍ ﹴﻭ ﻟﻪ ﻏ ﲑ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺣ ﺪ ﹶ
ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﺿﺒﻄﻪ ﻭﻗﹶﺒﻮﻟﻬﻢ ﻟﻪ.
- 33 -
ﻚ ﺇﻻ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎ ًﺀ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻛﻢ ﻋﺎﻟ ﹴﻢ ﺃﺧ ﱠﻞ ﺑﺸﺮ ﻃ ﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺘﺒ ﺮ ﺫﻟ
ﺡ ﰲ ﺷﺮ ﻃﻪ ،ﻓﺘﻨﺒﻪ ﺭﲪﻚ ﺍﷲ. ﺩﻭ ﹶﻥ ﻗﺪ ﹴ
ﺐ
ﻆ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳ ﹺ
ﺾ ﻣﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻋﻨ ﺪ ﺫﻛ ﹺﺮ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﰒ ﺣﺼﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﺎﻗ
"ﻋﻮﺳﺠ ﹶﺔ ﺍﳌﻜﻲ" ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ "ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭ" ﻓﻘﺎﻻ:
ﺴ ﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ،ﺗﻔ ﺮ ﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻋﻤـﺮﻭ ﻕﺣ ﺑﻞ ﺻﺪﻭ
ﻱ ﻭﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒـﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺑ ﻦ ﺩﻳﻨﺎﺭ ،ﻭﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺯﺭﻋ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯ
ﺴ ﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹶﻪ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻗـﺎﻝ ﺃﺑـﻮ ﺣـﺎ ﹴﰎ
ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ ﻭﺣ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ :ﻟﻴﺲ ﲟﺸﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨـﺎﺭﻱ ﱂ ﻳـﺼ ﺢ
ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹸﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﷲ ،ﺃﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﺳﻮﺃ ﺣـﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ ﻧﺎﺷﺪﺗﻜﻤﺎ ﺍ َ
ﺏﺍﻋﺘﺮﺿﺘﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﻋﻨﻪ "ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ" ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ ﹺ
ﺚ ﺳﹺﻴّﺪﻱ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﻉ ﺑﺒﹺﻴّﻨ ﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺪﻳ
ﻛﻮﱐ ﺣ ﹶﻜﻤﺎ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺩﻓﺎ
ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻋﻦ ﺃﻣﲑ ﺍﳌﺆﻣﻨﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ
ﺾ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﺎ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﺎ" ،ﻓﻮﻗﻌﺘﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﻠﺘﻤﺎ ﻋﻨﻪ "ﺗﻨﺎﻗ
ﻆ
ﻣﺎ ﻷﺟﻠﻪ ﺃﻟﱠﻔﺘﻤﺎ ﲢﺮﻳﺮﻛﻤﺎ ﻭﺃﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﺩﻋﻲ ﻋﺼﻤ ﹶﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﺐ ﺍﻟـﺸﺮﻳﻌ ﺔ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻷﺣ ﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺻﺎﺣ ﹺ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﻼﻡ ،ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺃﺩﻋﻲ ﻋﺼﻤﺘﻪ ﻭﻟﻪ ﻛـﻼ ﻡ ﻏـ ﲑ
- 34 -
ﳏﻤﻮ ﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘ ﹺﺢ ﰲ ﻗﺼ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻐﺮﺍﻧﻴﻖﹺ ،ﻟﻜ ﻦ ﺍﻷﻣ ﺮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺣﺼﻞ
ﺽ ﰲ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﳌﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﻭﺗﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﻟﻜﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿﻲ ﻋﻴﺎ
ﺍﳌﺴﺎﻟﻚ:
ﺻﺢ ﻭﻗﻴﺎ ﺳﻪ
ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﻋﻠ ﻢ ﺑﺎ ُﻷﺻﻮ ﹺﻝ ﻛﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺍﺳﺘ ﻨﺒﺎ ﹸﻃﻪ ﺃ
ﺱ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺃ ﺣﻖ ،ﻭﺇﻻ ﻓﻤﱴ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﱠﺖ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻷﺻﻮ ﹺﻝ ﻗـﺎ
ﻑ ﻫﺎ ﹴﺭ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﺃﻱ ﻓﺎﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ،
ﺍﻏﺘﺮﺍ ﹴﺭ ،ﻭﺑﻨﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﻔﺎ ﺟ ﺮ
ﻁ.
ﻑ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﹺﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﻮ
ﻑ ﺍﳍﺎ ﺭ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻄﺮ
ﳉ ﺮ
ﻭﺍ ﹸ
ﺖ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺻﺤﻴ ﺢ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﺭﺍ ﺩ ﺇﺩﺧﺎ ﹶﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴ ﹺﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠ ّﹺﻲ، ﻗﻠ
ﻆ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻓ ﻄﻨـﺎ ﺺ ﺃﻋﻠ ﻢ ﻭﺃﺣﻔ ﹶ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹸﻥ ﺍﻟﺸﺨ
ﻓﻴﻔﻮﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﻟﻴ ﹸﻞ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻷﺩﻟﺔﹸ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻌﺮﻓ ﹸﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻤﻘﻬـﺎ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺱ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻳ ﹸﺔ -ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻈﻬ ﺮ ﺐ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗ ﺔ -ﻭﺃﺑ ﻌ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﹺ
ﻣﺮﺍﺗ
ﻁ ﺫﻛﺎﺋﻪ ،ﻭﺫﺍ ﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻷﻋﻈ ﻢ ﺃﺑﻮ ﳌﹶﻦ ﺩﻭﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻟﻔﺮ
ﺣﻨﻴﻔ ﹶﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻛﺎﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﻨﺒ ﹴﻞ ﺭﺿﻲ
ﻆ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﱂ ﻳﻜ ﻦ ﺃﺣ ﺪ ﻳﺠﺎﺭﻳـ ﻪ ﰲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺣﻔ
ﺕ ﺍﷲ ﺭﺿـﻲ ﺍﷲ ﺝ ﺍﻷﺣﻜﺎﻡﹺ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺀﺍﻳ ﹰﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺀﺍﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍ ﹺ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤ ﺔ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌ ﺔ ﻛﻠّﻬﻢ ﺀﺍﻣﲔ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﺐ،
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺳﺎﺀﱐ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺮﺃﺗﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘ ﺪّﻣ ﺔ ﲢﺮﻳ ﹺﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳـ ﹺ
- 35 -
ﻁ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻏﲑﹺﳘﺎ ﻣﻤﻦ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻫ ﹲﻞ ﳍﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻨﻌ ﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮ
ﻼ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎ ﹴﰎ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺻﺪﻗﹰﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻻ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﻧﻘ ﹰ
ﺼﺘ ﻪ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺧﱪ ﺓ ﺍﻷﺋﻤ ﺔ ﺍﳉﻬﺎﺑﺬ ﺓ ﰲ ﻧﻘ ﺪﻱﰲﻗ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯ ّﹺ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ:
ﻒﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﳓﻦ ﺭﺯﹺﻗﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻬﻴﹸﺄ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺨ ﱪ ﻙ ﻛﻴ
ﺚ ﻣﻨ ﹶﻜ ﺮ ﺇﻻ ﲟﺎ ﺚ ﻛﺬﺏ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺪﻳ ﹲ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ َﹶ
ﻧﻌﺮﻓﻪ.
ﻓﻌﻘﱠﺒﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ :ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠ ﹸﺔ ﻫﻲ ﺍﳌﺮﺣﻠ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻷﻛﺜ ﺮ
ﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞﹺ ،ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺒ ﻊ
ﺃﻫﻤﻴ ﹰﺔ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳ ﹺﺦ ﺍﳉﺮ ﹺ
ﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ،ﺇﺫ ﻳﺘﻌﻴ ﻦ ﲨ ﻊ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻬﹺﻢ
ﺍﻟﻴﻮﻡ ،ﻻ ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺨﺘ ﹶﻠ
ﻭﺩﺭﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪ ﺓ ﺃﻭﺟﻪ:
ﰒ ﻭﺿﻌﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋ ﺪ ﻟﻠﺠﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻦ.
ﻭﱂ ﺃﺟ ﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃ ﻲ ﻋﻦ
ﺝ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﰲ ﻣﻌﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﹺﻨﻌﻢ:
ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺎ ﹺ
ﻑ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻧﻴ ﺪ ﻭﺍﻟ ﻌﹶﻠ ﹶﻞ ﻭﺃﲰﺎ َﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎ ﹺﻝ
ﺙ ﻣﻦ ﻋ ﺮ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﶈ ّﺪ ﹸ
ﻆ ﻣﻊ ﺫﻟﻚ ﲨﻠ ﹰﺔ ﻣـﺴﺘﻜﺜﹶﺮ ﹰﺓ ﻣـﻦ ﱄ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺯﻝﹶ ،ﻭﺣ ﻔ ﹶﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎ ﹶ
ﺐ ﺍﻟﺴﺘ ﹶﺔ ﻭﻣﺴﻨ ﺪ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﺑ ﻦ ﺣﻨﺒ ﹴﻞ ﻭﺳـﻨ ﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﻮﻥ ،ﻭﲰ ﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘ
- 36 -
ﻒ ﺟـﺰ ٍﺀ
ﺿ ﻢ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﺪ ﹺﺭ ﺃﻟ
ﱐﻭ
ﺠ ﻢ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍ ّﹺ
ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻬﻘ ّﹺﻲ ﻭﻣﻌ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺟﺰﺍ ِﺀ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﻴ ﺔ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻗ ﱡﻞ ﺩﺭﺟﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺳـﻤﻊ ﻣـﺎ
ﺥ ﻭﺗﻜﱠﻠ ﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟ ﻌﹶﻠ ﹺﻞ
ﻕ ﻭﺩﺍ ﺭ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮ ﹺ
ﺐ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﺎ
ﺫﻛﺮﻧﺎﻩ ﻭﻛﺘ
ﺕ ﺍ ﹸﳌﺤـ ﺪّﺛﲔ ،ﰒ ﻭﺍﻟ ﻮﻓﹶﻴﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺎﻧﻴ ﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺃﻭ ﹺﻝ ﺩﺭﺟـﺎ
ﷲ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺎ َﺀ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﺀ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰﻳﺰﻳ ﺪ ﺍ ُ
ﷲ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣ ﹶﺔ -ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﲡﻮﻳ ﹺﺰ
ﻓﻌﺒﺎﺭﺗﻬﻤﺎ -ﻧﺴﺄ ﹸﻝ ﺍ َ
ﺡ
ﻅ ﻭ ﹶﺫﻭﹺﻱ ﺩﺭﺟ ﺔ ﺍﻻﺟﺘـﻬﺎ ﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳉـﺮ ﹺ ﳊﻔﹼﺎ
ﺻﺔ ﺑﺎ ﹸ
ﻣﺮﺗﺒ ﺔ ﺧﺎ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳ ﹺﻞ ﺣﻴﺚ ﻗﺎﻻ "ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺗﺘﺒ ﻊ ﺍﻟﻴﻮ ﻡ " ﺃﻱ
ﻣﻘﺎﻟ ﹸﺔ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎ ﹴﰎ " ﳓﻦ ﺭﺯﹺﻗﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﺎ ﻻ ﻳﺘﻬﻴﹸﺄ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺨـ ﱪ ﻙ
ﺚ ﻣﻨ ﹶﻜ ﺮ
ﺚ ﻛﺬﺏ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺪﻳ ﹲ ﻒ ﻋﻠﻤﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ َﹶ ﻛﻴ
ﺇﻻ ﲟﺎ ﻧﻌﺮﻓﹸﻪ".
ﺑﻞ ﺻﺮﺣﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﻣ ﺔ ﺑﺄﻤﺎ "ﺍﺟﺘﻬﺪﺍ" ﻓﻘﺎﻻ" :ﻟﻘـﺪ
ﻒ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ" ،ﻓﺄﻗﻮﻝ ﻭﺍ ُ
ﷲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ: ﺍﺟﺘ ﻬﺪﻧﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺨﺘ ﹶﻠ
ﺐ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻴﻮ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻴﻮ ﻡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻛ ﱪ ﻣﻨﻜﻤﺎ ﺑﻜﺜ ﹴﲑ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻴ ﺦ ﺷﻌﻴ
ﺃﻧﺎ ﻭﺃﻧﺘﻤﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﻗﹶﻨﺎ ﻭﻣﻦ ﲢﺘﻨﺎ ﺩﻭﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮ ﻡ ﺩﻭﻧﻬـﺎ
ﺸ ﺮ ﻣـﺎ ﺫﻛـ ﺮ ﻩ ﺼ ﹶﻞ ﺃﺣﺪﻧﺎ ﻋـ
ﺽ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑﻌﺔﹸ ،ﻭﻫﻞ ﺣ ﺍﻷﺭ
ﺙ ،ﺣﱴ ﺗﺄﺗﻴﺎ ﺕ ﺍﳌﹸﺤ ّﺪ
ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃ ﻲ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜ ّﹺﻲ ﰲ ﺃﹸﻭﱃ ﺩﺭﺟﺎ
- 37 -
ﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭ ﺓ ﻋﻈﻴﻤ ﺔ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳ ﹺﺢ ﲜﻮﺍ ﹺﺯ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺩ ﻟﻜﻤﺎ ﻭﻟﻐﲑﹺﻛﻤﺎ
ﺱ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﲎ ﻛﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎ ﹴﰎ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻼ ﻗﻠﺘﻢ ﻟﻠﻨﺎ ﹺ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ،ﻭ ﻫ ﹼ
ﺴ ﻪ
ﺡ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﻘﺼﻮ ﺩ ﰲ ﻧﻔـ ِ ﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﻨﻘ ﺪ ﰲ ﺍﺘ ﹺﻬ ﺪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ
ﺚ ﻭ ﻋﹶﻠﻠﻪ ﻭﺃﻳﻦ
ﻕ ﺍﳌ ﹼﻄﻠ ﹺﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ
ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺣ ّﹺﻖ ﺍﳌﺎﻫﺮﹺ ﺍﳊﺎﺫ ﹺ
ﺃﻧﺘﻤﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺮﺗﺒ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻤﺔ ،ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻣﺮﺗﺒ ﹲﺔ ﻻ ﲡﻮ ﺯ ﻷﺣـ ﺪ
ﻣﻨﺎ ﻗﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﺒﺘﻮﺗﺎ.
ﺺ ﻋﻦ ﻗـﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺍﳊـﺎﻓﻆ: ﺚ ﺍﻟﺸﺨ ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﹶﻓﻌﻼ ﻗﺪ ﻳﺒﺤ ﹸ
ﻼ ﻓﻼ ﹺﳚﺪﻩ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺘﺒ ﹺﻊ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹸﻥﺖ ﻭﺛﹼﻘ ﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥﹶ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻗﻠ
ﺴ ﹺﺦ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺑﲔ ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ،ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻻ ﰲ ﺗﺮﲨ ﺔ ﺭﺍﻓ ﹺﻊ ﻧﻘﺼﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﺖ :ﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ( ﻣﺎ ﻧﺼﻪ:
ﻆ )ﻗﻠ
ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﹸﺃﺳﻴ ﺪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻗﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﺑﻞ ﳎﻬﻮ ﹲﻝ ﻭﱂ ﻳ ﻮّﺛﻘﹾﻪ ﺃﺣﺪ ،ﺗﻔ ﺮ ﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺟﻌﻔـ ﺮ
ﺐ:ﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳ ﹺ
ﷲ ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﰲ ﺬﻳ ﹺ ﺑ ﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍ ِ
ﺕ .ﻗﻠﻨﺎ:ﱂ ﳒﺪﻩ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺫﻛ ﺮ ﻩ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒﺎ ﹶﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎ
ﱯ ﺑﻨﻔﻴﹺﻪ
ﺖ ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻔ ﺮ ﺩ ﻓﻜﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻷﻟﻴ ﻖ ﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺘﺒﹺﻌﺎ ﺍﻟﺬﻫ
ﻗﻠ
ﻋﻠﻤﻪ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﺃﺩﺭﺍﻫﻤﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻛﻤـﺎ ﻗـﺎﻝ ﺍﺑـ ﻦ
ﺖ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺟﻌﻔ ﹺﺮ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﹼﺎﻥ ،ﻭﻋﺒﺎﺭ ﹸﺓ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ :ﻣﺎ ﻋﻠﻤ
ﷲ ﻭﺍﻟ ﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍ ِ
- 38 -
ﻱ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺛﻴ ﻖ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺒﺎ ﹶﻥ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧﻘﻠﹶﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﺎﻭ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﻔ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻠﻄﻴﻔ ﺔ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ :ﺫﻛﺮ ﻩ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒﺎ ﹶﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻫﻮ
ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻥ ﻧﻘﻼ ﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺗﻮﺛﻴ ﹺﻖ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺒﺎ ﹶﻥ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻘﺒ ﹸﻞ ﻗﻮ ﹸﻝ ﻗﺎﺋ ﹴﻞ
"ﻟﻌﻠﱠﻪ" ﻗﹼﻠ ﺪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﺩﺍ ﱞﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺟﺰ ﻣ ﻪ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ
ﺐ ﳌﻌﺮﻓ ﺔ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ،ﰒ ﻧﺒ ﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧ ﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺟﺎ ﹺﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳ ﹺ
ﻱ
ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻟﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﹰﺔ ﻭﻻ ﳜﻔﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟـﺴﺨﺎﻭ
ﺕﻚ ﰲ ﻛﻮﹺﻧ ﻪ ﺃﺧ ﹶﺬ ﺛﻘـﺎ ﻆ ﻟﻠﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﳎﺘ ﹺﻬ ﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﻻ ﺷ ﺣﺎﻓ ﹲ
ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺒﺎ ﹶﻥ ﰲ ﲨﻠ ﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺣﺼﻠﻪ ﰲ ﻋﻠﻮ ﹺﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﻣﺜﻠﺘﻪ
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻭﻗﺎﺹ ﺍﻟﺰﻫﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷـﻲ،
ﻋﺪﺍﺩﻩ ﰲ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﳌﺪﻳﻨﺔ ،ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺃﻳﻮﺏ ﺍﻷﻧـﺼﺎﺭﻱ،
ﻭﻋﻨﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ،ﻗﺎﻟـﻪ ﺍﺑـ ﻦ ﺣﺒـﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺛﺎﻧﻴـ ﺔ
ﺛﻘﺎﺗﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴ ﺔ ﺑﻌـ ﺪ ﺍﻟـﺼﺤﺎﺑ ﺔ ﻭﻫـﻢ
ﺍﻷُﻭﱃ.
ﻓﻬﺬﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﺎ ﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﹶﲔ ﺛﻘﺘﲔ ﻳﺜﺒﺘﺎ ﻥ ﺗﻮﺛﻴ ﻖ ﺍﺑـ ﹺﻦ
ﲔ
ﺺ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻮﺟﻮ ﺩ ﺑـ ﺣﺒﺎ ﹶﻥ ﻭﻳﺸﲑﺍ ﻥ ﲝﺴﺐ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺇﱃ ﻧﻘ ﹴ
- 39 -
ﺃﻳﺪﻳﻨﺎ ﻛﺤﺎ ﹺﻝ ﻣﺴﻨ ﺪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﻭﻏﲑﹺﻩ ،ﻭﻳﻘـﻀﻴﺎ ﻥ ﻻﺑـ ﹺﻦ
ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﹺﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺇﻧﻜﺎ ﺭﳘﺎ ﻣﻨ ﹶﻜ ﺮ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺍﻛﺘﻔﹶﻴﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ
"ﱂ ﳒﺪﻩ" ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﳌﹰﺎ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﳌﹸﻨ ﹶﻜ ﺮ ﺟ ﺰﻣﻬﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﻔﻲﹺ ،ﻭﺃﻧـﻰ
ﺽ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺘﻬ ﺪ ﻭﻟﻮ ﺑﻠﻐﺖ ﻛﺘﺒـ ﻪ ﻋﻨـﺎ ﹶﻥ ﻟﻠﻤﻘّﻠ ﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻌﺘﺮ
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﺀ.
ﺱ ﱂ ﻳﺒﻠﹸـﻎ ﻣﺮﺗﺒـ ﹶﺔ ﲔ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﹺ
ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭﻱ ﻣﻊ ﺟﻼﹶﻟﺘ ﻪ ﺑ
ﺐ ﺃﻥ ﺏ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻟﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﻌ ﺔ ﺍ ﻃّﻼﻋـﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳌـﺬﻫ ﹺ ﺍﻷﺻﺤﺎ ﹺ
ﺝ ﻭﺟﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌﻲ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺑﻠ ﹶﻎ ﻳﺴﺘﺨﺮ
ﻒ ﻋﻨـﺪﻩ، ﻑ ﺣﺪﻩ ﻓﻮﹶﻗ ﻣﺮﺗﺒ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺟﻴ ﹺﺢ ﻓﺤﺴﺐ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻋ ﺮ
ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻔﺎ ﺩ ﻭﺃﻓﺎﺩ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭ ﹸﺓ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻴ ﺦ ﺷﻌﻴﺐ.
ﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜ ﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ:
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭ
ﺤ ﹺﺮّ ﻭﺟﻬﻲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎ ﻣﺴ ﻪ ﹶﻗ ﺪ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﺍﻭﹺﻱ
ﻋﺴﻰ ﹶﺃﹺﻧّﻲ ﹶﺃ ﻣﺲ ﹺﺑ
ﺐ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﻧﻜﺎ ﺭ ﺣ ﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺤﺬﻳ ﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭ ﺓ ﺑﺴﺒ ﹺ
ﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻼ ﻓﺮ
ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ،ﻷﻥ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎ ﹺﻝ ﺟﺮﺣﺎ ﻭﺗﻌﺪﻳ ﹰ
ﺚ ﻗﹶﺒﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻭ ﺭﺩﺍ ،ﻭﻛﻼ ﺍﻷﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻟـﻴﺲ ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳ
ﱐ ﺷ ﹶﻄﺤﺎﺗﻪ
ﺐ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ -ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎ ّﹺ ﳍﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻞ ﺃﻧﻜﺮﻧﺎ – ﻭﺷﻌﻴ
- 40 -
ﱐ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﹲﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺯﻳﻐﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻧﺬﹶﺭ
ﺇﻻ ﻷﺟ ﹺﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎ ﱠ
ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻟﻠﻄﻌ ﹺﻦ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺑﺄﻗﺴﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻷﺭﺑﻌ ﺔ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻮﺍﻓ ﻖ ﻫﻮﺍﻩ.
ﺐ ﻭﻻ ﻑ ﺷ ﻌﻴﺒﺎ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻼ ﹺﻝ ﲢﻘﻴ ﹺﻖ ﺍﻟﻜﺘ ﹺ ﻭﺃﻧﺎ ﻻ ﺃﻋﺮ
ﲔ ﺍﻟﻈ ّﹺﻦ ،ﻭﻻ ﱄ ﻣﺄﺧ ﹲﺬ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺌﻠ ﺔ ﻳﺴﻌﲏ ﺳﻮﻯ ﲢﺴ ﹺ
ﺖ
ﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺩ ﻫﺬﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻴﺤ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻋﻴ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺟﺒ ﹸﺔ ﳌﺎ ﺗﻜﻠﻤ
ﺕ
ﺖ ﻗﺪ ﺃﺳﺄ ﻼ ﻭﺃﺭﺟﻮ ﱄ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺍﳋ ﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺪﺍﺩ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﻨ ﺃﺻ ﹰ
ﷲ
ﻕ ﺍﳊ ّﺪ ﺍﳉﺎﺋ ﹺﺰ ﺷﺮﻋﺎ ﻓـﺈﱐ ﺃﺳـﺘﻐﻔ ﺮ ﺍ َ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼ ﹺﻡ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻮ
ﺏ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﹺﺑ ﻮ ﺳ ﻌﻲ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣ ّﺬ ﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﻭﺃﺗﻮ
ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃﻠﺔ.
ﺏ "ﻣﻨﺎﻗـﺸﺔ ﺕ ﻟﺘﻠﻤﻴ ﺬﻩ ﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺪﺳﻲ ﻛﺘﺎ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺮﺃ
ﲔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼ ﺓ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺴﻮﺍﺭﻱ" ﺭ ﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﻢ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻗﻮﻳﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺰ ﻡ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎﹺﻧّﹺﻴ
ﺏ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺤ ﻤ ﺪ ﻋﻠﻴ ﻪ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﺧﺸﻰ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹶﻥ ﺣﺼ ﹶﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﺩ
ﺚ ﲣﺮﻳ ﺞ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳـﺚ ،ﻓﻘـﺪ ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﹸ ﺼ ﹴ
ﻉ ﺗﻌ
ﻟﻪ ﻧﻮ
ﺚ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺍﺳﺘﺪ ﱠﻝ ﺎ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎﻧﻴﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻭﺑﻴ ﻦ ﺿﻌﻔﹶﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪﺍ ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﹶ
ﺗﻠ ﻮ ﺍﻵ ﺧﺮﹺ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺬﻛ ﺮ ﻣﺴﺌﻠ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻘ ﹺﻮّﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﻋﺘـﻀﺎ ﺩ ﻭﱂ
ﺚ ﻳﺘﻘـﻮﻯ ﺑﺘﻌـﺪﺩ ﺖ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻣﻌﻠﻮ ﻡ ﻭﻣﻘ ﺮ ﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﹶ
ﻳﻠﺘ ﻔ
ﻼ ﻟﻠﺨﺼ ﹺﻢ ﻻ ﻧﺄﺧ ﹸﺬ ﺑ ﻪ ﻓﻌﻠﻴﻨﺎ ﺚ ﺩﻟﻴ ﹰﺍﻟ ﹸﻄ ﺮﻕﹺ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﹸ
- 41 -
ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋ ﺪ ﺷﺌﻨﺎ ﺃﻡ ﺃﺑﻴﻨﺎ ﻟﻨﺴﻠ ﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻳﻮ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻴﺎﻣـﺔ،
ﺚ ﻣﺮﺩﻭﺩﺍ ﻣﻬﻤـﺎ ﻛﺜـﺮﺕ ﻃﺮﻗـ ﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﹸﻮ ﹸﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﹸ
ﻉ ﻭﺍﳌﺼﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﺥ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻟﻺﲨﺎ ﹺ ﻛﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮ ﹺ
ﻱ ﺃﻣﺜﻠ ﹲﺔ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ،
ﺍﳌﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺑﻐ ﹺﲑ ﻩ ﻣﻊ ﻭﺟﻮ ﺩ ﻩ ﻭﰲ ﺳﻨﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬ ّﹺ
ﺐ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻳﺘﻔﺎﺧ ﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳋﺼ ﻢ ﻣﻊ ﺇﻛﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻟﺘﺠﻨﺒﹺﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﺘ ﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﺴ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ.
ﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺃﻇـﻦ، ﺃﻣﺎ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﻋﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺑﻐﺪﺍﺩ
ﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻋ ﻤﻠﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣ ﺔ ﺳﻴ ﹺﺮ ﺃﻋﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼ ِﺀ ﻭﻗﺪﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳ
ﲔ
ﻉ ﺍﻟﺴّﹺﻴ ﺪ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﺎﻋ ّﹺﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟ ﻌﹶﻠ ﻤ ﹺ
ﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﺗﺒﺎ
ﷲ ﺳﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻈـﻴﻢ ،ﻓﻘـﺪ ﻭﺍﻟ ﻌ ﹾﻠﻤﲔ ﺳﻠﻄﺎ ﻥ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺭﻓﲔ ﻗﺪﺱ ﺍ ُ
ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺞ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﻋﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺘﺒﻪ ﻫـﻮ
ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨ ﺪ ﻧﻔﺴِﻪ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﺍﻋﺘﱪﻫﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺎﺭﻗﲔ ﻣـﻦ
ﺏ ﺃﺣﻮﺍ ﹴﻝ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻧﻴﺔ.
ﺍﻟﺪﻳ ﹺﻦ ﺃﺻﺤﺎ
ﺡ
ﺺ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻳﻔ ﺮ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺸﺎ ﹴﺭ ﺷﻨﻴ ﻊ ﻭﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﹲﺓ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨ ّﹺ
ﺎ ﻗﻠﻴ ﹸﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮﹺ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪ ﱠﻝ ﺑﻜﻼﻣﻪ "ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎﺡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻏﺪﺓ"
ﰲ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻜﻤﻴﻞ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﺪﺍﻓ ﻊ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟـﺬﻫﱯ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﺪ ﹲﻝ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻣﺎﻧﺔ ﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﻋﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﻻ
- 42 -
ﺡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻏﺪﺓ" ،ﻭﺧﺎﺻ ﹰﺔ ﺍﻷﺧ ﲑ ﻷﻧـﻪ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻣﻦ "ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺎ ﹺ
ﱯ ﰲ ﺳـ ﹺﲑ ﺃﻋـﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺺ ﻛﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻫ ّﹺﻉ ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺔ ﺗﺎﻣ ﺔ ﺑﻨ ّﹺ ﺍﻃﻼ ﹴ
ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀِ ،ﻟﻜﻨﻪ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻳﻜﻔﻴ ﻪ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻐ ﹼﻞ ﻛﻼ ﻡ ﺑـﺸﺎﺭ ﻋـﻮﺍﺩ
ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ،ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺑ ﺮﹶﺃ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻤ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻱ ﻭﺃﻧـﻪ
ﺐ
ﺐ ﺍﻟـﺼﻮﻓﻴ ﹶﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻐـﻀ ﻀ ﳎﺮ ﺩ ﻧﺎﻗ ﹴﻞ ﻻ ﻏﲑ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﻐـ
ﺏ
ﷲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎ ﹴ ﺕﺍَﷲ ﺍﻟﺴﻼﻣ ﹶﺔ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺪﹺﻳّﲔ ﻧﺴﺄ ﹸﻝ ﺍ َ
ﺝ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﻋﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻭﻣﺎ ﷲ ﺃﺭ ﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺘﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﺼ ﹴﻞ ﺑﺈﺫ ﻥ ﺍ ِ
ﱯ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻓﺴﺎ ﺩ ﻭﺿﺮ ﹴﺭ ﻭﺑﻬﺘﺎ ﻥ ﻭﺧﻄﺮﹴ ،ﻭﺃﻓّﹺﻨ ﺪ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻛﻼ ﻡ ﺍﻟﺬﻫ ّﹺ
ﷲ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻴ ﻊ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻗـﺪ ﺃﲰﻴﺘـﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﱪﻫﺎ ﻥ ﺍﳉﻠ ّﹺﻲ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎ َﺀ ﺍ ُ
ﻉ ﻋـﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﺎﻋﻴـ ﺔ ﻭﺍﻟـﺼﻮﻓﻴ ﺔ
ﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎ ﹺ
)ﻧﺼ
ﺍﻷﺳﻴﺎﺩ(.
ﻣﺜﺎ ﹲﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﺧﻄﺎﺋﻬﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﺍﺿﺤﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ:
ﱯﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺰ ِﺀ ﺍﻷﻭ ﹺﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺳﻴ ﹺﺮ ﺃﻋﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻟﻨـﺒﻼ ِﺀ ﻟﻠـﺬﻫ ّﹺ
ﺚ ﺍﳉﺰ ِﺀ ﺍﻷﻭ ﹺﻝ ﺏ ﻋﻠﻴ ﻪ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺷﻌﻴﺒﺎ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﺘﺨﺮﻳ ﹺﺞ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳ
ﻭﻣﻜﺘﻮ
ﻕ ﺍﳋﻤـ ﹺﺮ ﰲ ﺗﺮﲨ ﺔ ﺳّﹺﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﺧﺎﻟ ﺪ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴ ﺪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﹺﺯ ّﹺ
ﻼ" ﻣﺎ ﻧﺼﻪ ﻣﻦ ﲣـﺮﻳ ﹺﺞ ﺐ ﻋﺴ ﹰ "ﺍﻟﻠﻬ ﻢ ﺍﺟﻌ ﹾﻠﻪ ﻋﺴﻼﹰ ،ﻓﺎﻧ ﹶﻘﹶﻠ
ﺚ: ﺍﳊﺪﻳ
- 43 -
ﻆ ﰲ "ﺍﻹﺻﺎﺑﺔ" ﺇﱃ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﲔ،
ﺴﺒﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﻧ
ﻭﺇﱃ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟـﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺈﺳـﻨﺎ ﺩ
ﺻﺤﻴ ﹴﺢ ،ﻋﻦ ﺧﻴﺜﻤﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ "...ﻭﺍﻧﻈﹸـﺮ "ﺍﻹﺻـﺎﺑﺔ" ﻓﻔﻴﻬـﺎ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺘﺎﻥ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻆ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺑـ ﹺﻦ ﺖ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻏ ﲑ ﺻﺤﻴﺢﹴ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻨ
ﺴﺒ ﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ ﻗﻠ
ﻆ ﲝﺮﻭﻓﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻹﺻﺎﺑ ﺔ:
ﺳﻌﺪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻋﺒﺎﺭ ﹸﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﺴﻔﺮ ﳌﺎ ﻗﹶـ ﺪ ﻡ ﺲ ﺑ ﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻳﻮﻧ
ﺿ ﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺭﺍﺣﺘ ﻪ ﰒ ﺳ ﻤﻰ
ﺴ ّﹴﻢ ﻓﻮ
ﳊ ﺮ ﹶﺓ ﹸﺃﺗ ﻲ ﹺﺑ
ﺧﺎﻟ ﺪ ﺑ ﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴ ﺪ ﺍ ﹶ
ﻀ ﺮﻩ .ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺑﻦ ﺳـﻌﺪ ﻣـﻦ
ﻭ ﺷ ﹺﺮﺑﻪ ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳ
ﻭﺟﻬﲔ ﺀﺍ ﺧﺮﻳﻦ.
ﺢ ﻋﻦ ﺧﻴﹶﺜﻤ ﹶﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ
ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﺈﺳﻨﺎ ﺩ ﺻﺤﻴ ﹴ
ﹸﺃﺗ ﻲ ﺧﺎﻟ ﺪ ﺑ ﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻴ ﺪ ﹺﺑ ﺮ ﺟ ﹴﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﹺﺯﻕ ﺧ ﻤ ﹴﺮ ،ﻓﻘﺎ ﹶﻝ :ﺍﻟﻠـ ﻬﻢ
ﻼ .ﻭﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﻟﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﺟ ﻪ ﻣ ﺮ
ﺴﹰ
ﻼ ﻓﺼﺎ ﺭ ﻋ
ﺴﹰ
ﺍ ﺟ ﻌ ﹾﻠ ﻪ ﻋ
ﻕ ﲬ ﹴﺮ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺧ ﱞﻞ ،ﻗـﺎﻝ ﺭﺟ ﹲﻞ ﲞﺎﻟ ﺪ ﻭﻣﻌﻪ ﹺﺯ
ﻼ ،ﻓﻨﻈﺮﻭﺍ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺧ ﱞﻞ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺧ ﻤ ﺮﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﷲ ﺧ ﺟ ﻌﹶﻠﻪ ﺍ ُ
ﷲ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴ ﹸﻞ ﺑ ﻦ ﺃﰊﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ :ﺃﺧﱪﻧﺎ ﳏﻤ ﺪ ﺑ ﻦ ﻋﺒﻴ ﺪ ﺍ ِ
- 44 -
ﺧﺎﻟ ﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺯﻳﺎ ﺩ ﻣﻮﹶﻟﻰ ﺀﺍ ﹺﻝ ﺧﺎﻟ ﺪ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺧﺎﻟ ﺪ ﻋﻨ ﺪ ﻣﻮﺗـ ﻪ ...
ﺍﱁ.
ﺴﺒﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﺫﻟﻚﻆ ﱂ ﻳﻨ ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻓﺎﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﻍ ﳍﻤﺎ ﻒ ﻳﺴﻮ ﹸ
ﺴ ﻢ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﺩﺭﻱ ﻛﻴ ﺚ ﺀﺍﺧ ﺮ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺑﹺﻪ ﺍﻟ ﺣﺪﻳ ﹲ
ﻕﺍﻻﺟﺘﻬﺎ ﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎ ﹺﻝ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺒﺬﹸﻝ ﺃﺣﺪﳘﺎ ﺟﻬﺪﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﻈ ﹺﺮ ﻓﻮ
ﺕ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ
ﻉ ﺇﱃ ﻃﺒﻘﺎ ﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻮ
ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭ ﺓ ﺑﺴﻄ ﹺﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺘﻜﱠﻠ
ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﻟﻴﺘﺒﻴ ﻦ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺃﺧﻄﹶﺄ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﺃﺧ ﹶﻄﺌﹸﻮﺍ ﻣﻌـﻪ ﻭﺇ ﹾﻥ
ﺏ ﺃﺧ ﹶﻄﺌﹸﻮﺍ ﻭﺣﺪﻫﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻠ ﻢ ﺃﻣﺎﻧ ﹲﺔ ﺃﻋﻈﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﺻﺎ
ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﻢ.
ﻭ ﻋ ﻮﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺑﺪﻱ ٍﺀ ،ﻓﻘﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺫﺍ ﻙ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑـ ﹺﻦ
ﺺ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠـ ﹴﺮ ﺳﻌ ﺪ "ﺃﺧﺸﻰ" ﻗﺪ ﺯﺍﻝ ﻭﻇﻬﺮ ﺑﻄﻼﻧﻪ ﺑﺘﻨﺼﻴ ﹺ
ﻭﺳﺄﻧﻘ ﹸﻞ ﻛﻼﻣﻪ ﲝﺮﻭﻓﻪ:
)ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ( ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑـ ﻦ ﺳـﻌ ﺪ
ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺷﻲ ﻛﻮﰲ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻻﻩ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ.
ﻭﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺮ ﻭﺃﺑـﻮ
ﰲ ﻭﲪـﺎﺩ ﺑـﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻕ ﺍﻟﻜـﻮ ﱡ
ﺷﻴﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
- 45 -
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ.
ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﺛﻘﺔ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﲝﺮﻭﻓﻪ
ﻚ ﻫﻮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻮ ﺃﺭﺍ ﺩ ﺍﺑ ﻦ
ﻒ ﺳﻮ ِﺀ ﻧﻴ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋ ﹺﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺸﻜﻴ
ﻭﻛﺸ
ﺖ :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﺛﻘﺔ،
ﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﹶﻪ ﳌﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻗﻠ
ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭ
ﻱ ﻟـﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺣﺎﺟﺔ ﺑﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﻘﻞ ﺗﻮﺛﻴ ﻖ ﺍﳌ ﺰ ّﹺ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋ ﹺﻲّ ﻧﻔﺴِﻪ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻖ ﺍﳌﺰﻱ ﻟﻪ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ :ﻗﻠﺖ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﺛﻘﺔ .ﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻻ ﺣﺸﻮ ،ﻭﻫﻞ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﰲ ﺭﺃﻳﹺﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟﺔ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﻐﻔﻠـ ﺔ
ﻭﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ﺓ ﺣﱴ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﺛﻘﺔ(
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﺛﻘﺔ؟ ﺣﺎﺷﺎﻩ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺣﺴﺎﺑﻬﻢ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ.
ﻓﺎﳌﺴﺌﻠﺔﹸ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺳﻮ َﺀ ﻓﻬ ﹴﻢ ﺑﻞ ﺳﻮ ُﺀ ﻧﻴ ﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴـﺎﺫ
ﺾ ﺻﺎﺭ ﻳ ﻌ ﺪ ﻛـ ﱠﻞﺑﺎﷲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﻮﺱ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺼﻴﺒ ﹸﺔ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻌ
ﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻌ ﹺﻦ ﲝ ﹴﻖ ﻭﺑﺒﺎﻃ ﹴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺬﻛﺎﺀِ ،ﻓﻴﺆﺩﻱ ﺏ ﻣﻦ ﺿﺮﻭ ﹺ ﺿﺮ ﹴ
ﺺ
ﺺ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴ ﹶﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺗﻨﻘﻴ ﹺ ﻢ ﺍﻷﻣ ﺮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻘﻴ ﹺ
- 46 -
ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﻋﻠ ّﹴﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺴﻼ ﻡ ﰲ ﳏﺎﻭﻻﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺮ ﺩ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓـﻀﻲ
ﺑﻜ ّﹺﻞ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻇﻠ ﻢ ﻭﺧﻴﺎﻧ ﹲﺔ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫـﻮ ﺟﻠـﻲ،
ﻭﺍﻟﺴﺎﻋ ﹸﺔ ﺀﺍﺗﻴ ﹲﺔ ﻻ ﺭﻳﺐ ،ﻧﺴﺄﻟﹸﻚ ﺍﻟﺴﺘ ﺮ ﺍﳉﻤﻴ ﹶﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺭﲪٰﻦ.
ﻭﺍﻷﺩﻫﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﺣﺎﻭ ﹶﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﻜﻴﻚ ﺑﻘﻮﻟ ﻪ:
ﺐ– ﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬـﺬﻳ ﹺ
)ﻭﱂ ﻳﺬ ﹸﻛ ﹺﺮ ﺍﳋﺰﺭﺟ ﻲ ﰲ ﺧﻼﺻ ﺔ ﺗـﺬﻫﻴ ﹺ
ﺐ ﻟﻠﺬﻫﱯ – ﺣﻜﺎﻳ ﹶﺔ ﺗﻮﺛﻴ ﹺﻖ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﻟﻪ(.
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺬﻫﻴ
ﷲ ﺑﺪﺍ ِﺀ ﺍﻟﻄﻌ ﹺﻦ ﺑﻐ ﹺﲑ ﺣـ ّﹴﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴـﺎﺫ
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺑﺘﻼﻩ ﺍ ُ
ﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬـﺬﻳﺐ ،ﻭﺃﻳـ ﻦ ﺐ ﺑﺘﻬـﺬﻳ ﹺ ﺑﺎﷲ ،ﻓﻤﺎ ﻋﻼﻗ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺬﻫﻴ ﹺ
ﻉ ﻭﺍﳊﻔﻆ ،ﻫـﺬﻩ ﺍﳋﺮﺯﺟ ﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﰲ ﺳﻌ ﺔ ﺍ ﻻﻃﹼﻼ ﹺ
ﲔ ﺍﺑﺘ ﺪﻋﻬﺎ ﻫـﺆﻻ ِﺀﷲ ﻗﻮﺍﻋ ﺪ ﻣﻨ ﹶﻜ ﺮ ﹲﺓ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﹲﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤ
ﻭﺍ ِ
ﺼﺮﺍﺠ ﺔ ﳏﺎﺭﺑ ﺔ ﺍﻟﹺﺒﺪﻉ ،ﻓﻜﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻛﻤﻦ ﺑﲎ ﻗﺼﺮﺍ ﻭﻫﺪﻡ ﻣـ ﲝ
ﷲ
ﻭﺣﺴﺎﺑﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣـﺮﺍ ﻡ ﻣـﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒـﺎﺋ ﹺﺮ ﻭﺍ ُ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ.
ﻭﻫﻞ ﻳﺴﺘﻄﻴﻊ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﳜﱪﻧﺎ ﳌﺎﺫﺍ ﺍﻗﺘـﺼﺮ ﺍﳊـﺎﻓﻆ ﰲ
ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻓﺎﻉ ﻋﻦ ﺑﺸﲑ ﺑﻦ ﻃﻠﺤﺔ "ﻭﺛﹼﻘﻪ
ﲏ ﰲ ﺇﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻘـﻮﻝ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ" ،ﰒ ﻭﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﳊﺴﻴ
ﻣﺴﺘﺪ ﹺﺭﻛﹰﺎ :ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺄﺱ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
- 47 -
ﲏ ﺑﺄﻥ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ،
ﻓﻬﻞ ﺳﲑ ﺩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺴﻴ ّﹺ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺍﷲ ﹶﻟﻤﻦ ﺍﻷﻋﺎﺟﻴﺐ.
ﺗﻨﺒﻴ ﻪ :ﻭﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼ ﹺﻡ ﻟﻠﺬﻫﱯ :ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ
ﷲ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋ ﻤ ﹺﺮﻭ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺍﻟﻌـﺎﺹ ،ﺭﻭﻯ
ﰲ ﻣﻮﱃ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍ ِ
ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻜﻮ ﱡ
ﻋﻦ ﻣﻮﻻﻩ ﻭﻋﻦ ﺃﺧﻴ ﻪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻋﻨﻪ :ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﻕ،
ﻭﲪﺎﺩ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺷﻴﺒﺔ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﻑ
ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎﰎ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺧﻄﹲﺄ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ،ﻣﻊ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ
ﻳﺴﲑ ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎﰎ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻐﺮﻳﺐ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﺐ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﱃ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ،ﻓﺘﻨﺒﻪ، ﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳ ﹺ
ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﰲ ﺗﺬﻫﻴ ﹺ
ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ
ﷲ ﺻﺤﻴ ﺢ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﻠـﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻓﺎﻹﺳﻨﺎ ﺩ ﺍﻷﻭ ﹸﻝ ﲝﻤﺪ ﺍ ِ
ﻑ ﻣﺎ ﻳ ﺪﻋﻴﻪ ﻧﻔﺎ ﹸﺓ ﺍﻟﺘﻮ ّﺳ ﹺﻞ ﻫﺪﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﷲ ﺀﺍﻣﲔ.
ﺧﻼ
ﺢ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ
ﻃﺮﻳ ﻖ ﺀﺍﺧ ﺮ ﺻﺤﻴ
- 48 -
ﻋﻤﻦ ﲰﻊ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺧ ﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺟﻠﹸﻪ ﻓﻘﻴ ﹶﻞ :ﺍ ﹾﺫ ﹸﻛ ﺮ ﺃﺣﺐ
ﺱ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻳﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ(.
ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﹺ
ﲑ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳـﺤﺎﻕ
ﺲ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺯﻫ
ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻳﻮﻧ
ﺖ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻋﻤـ ﺮ ﻓﺨـ ﺪﺭﺕ
ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ :ﺟﺌ
ﺼﺒﻬﺎ ﻗﻠـﺖ:
ﺭﺟﻠﹸﻪ .ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﻣﺎ ﻟ ﹺﺮ ﺟﻠﻚ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﺟﺘﻤﻊ ﻋ
ﻉ( ﺃﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻳﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ،ﻓﺒﺴﻄﻬﺎ(.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
)ﹸﺍ ﺩ
ﻛﻼ ﻡ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺍﳊﺮﰊ
ﲔ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳـ ﺔ
ﺖ ﻓﻴﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎ ﻥ ﺇﳉﺎ ﻡ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔ
ﻗﻠ
ﰊّ ﻟ ﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼ ﹺﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﺲﹺ،
ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴ ﻢ ﺍﳊﺮ ﹺ
ﻓﻬﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﹲﺔ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﺔ ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ.
ﺗﻨﺒﻴ ﻪ :ﺍﹾﻟﻤﺨﺎﻟﻔﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻛﻌﺎﺩﺗﻬﹺﻢ ﻃﻌﻨﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺯﻫ ﹴﲑ ﺑﺄﻧـﻪ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﻃﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺟﻬ ﹲﻞ
ﻭ ﻏﺶ ﻟﻠﻤﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻹﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻭﺿﻌﻮ ﻩ ﻭﺗـﺼﻮﺭﻭ ﻩ
ﺯﺍﻝ ﲟﻮﺍﻓﻘﺔ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺯﻫﲑ ﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻁ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﲤﺴﻜﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻨﻌﻨ ﹸﺔ ﺯﺍﺋﻠ ﹲﺔ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ،
- 49 -
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻪ ﺻﻐﺎﺭ ﻃﻠﺒﺔ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﺗﻠﻘﱠﻮﻩ ﻣـﻦ ﺃﻫﻠـﻪ
ﻑ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ،ﻓﻘﻮﳍﻢ ﻣﺮﺩﻭ ﺩ ﻓﺎﺿﺢ.
ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ ،ﲞﻼ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻄﻨﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳊﺮﰊ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺗﺒـ ﻊ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺯﻫﲑ ﻟﺒﻴﺎ ﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑـ ﻦ ﺳـﻌﺪ
ﻣﻮﱃ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻭﻣﺜ ﹸﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺎ ﹺﻡ ﻻ ﻳﻀﺮ
ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﺀ ﻣﺴﻤﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺀﺍﺧﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣـﺎ ﻡ
ﻕ
ﺶ ﻭﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﺲ ﺛﻼﺛ ﺔ :ﺍﻷﻋﻤ ﹺ
ﺷﻌﺒ ﹸﺔ :ﻗﺪ ﻛﻔﻴﺘﻜﻢ ﺗﺪﻟﻴ
ﻭﻗﺘﺎﺩﺓ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﻓﺎﻹﺳﻨﺎ ﺩ ﲝﻤﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺮ
ﻁ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﺒﺮ. َ
ﺲ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻓﺪﻝﻭﻗﺪ ﺃ ﻣﻨﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ ﺗﺪﻟﻴ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﲰﻌﻪ ﳑﻦ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺍﻟﻘﺼ ﹶﺔ ﻭﷲ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺔ.
ﻓﺎﺋﺪ ﹲﺓ :ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺍﳊﺮ ّﹺ
ﰊ ﻋﻦ ﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻟـﻴﺲ ﻓﻴﻬـﺎ
ﺱ" ،ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻬﺎ ﺣـﱴ ﻻ ﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﹺ"ﺇﻟﻴﻚ" ﺇﳕﺎ ﻟﻔﻈﹸﻬﺎ "ﺍﺫﻛﺮ ﺃﺣ
ﻳﺮﻭﻳﻬﺎ ﺃﺣ ﺪ ﻋﻦ ﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻭﻳﺰﻳ ﺪ "ﺇﻟﻴﻚ" ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻤﺎ ﹺﻝ
ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﻑ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳊﺮﰊ ﺟﻴ ﺪ ﺟﻠﻴ ﹲﻞ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﺘﻨﺎ ﻷﻧـﻪ ﻭﺗﺼﺮ
ﺻﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﳌﺴﺘﺨﺮﺝ ﻳﺰﻳﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﺷـﻜﺎﻻﺕ ﺣـﻮﻝ
ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﻹﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻟﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﺃﺫﻛﺮ ﺑﻌـﻀﺎ
- 50 -
ﺕ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻫﻲ ﻛﻤﺴﺌﻠﺘﻨﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻜﺖ ﻣﻦ ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﺮﺟﺎ
ﺍﻟﻮﻓﻴﺔ ﻟﻠﱪﻫﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺎﻋ ّﹺﻲ ﺗﻠﻤﻴ ﺬ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﻂﻒ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴ ﹺﺢ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﳐـﺘﻠ ﻓﻤﻨﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻣﺼﻨ
ﺚ ﻣﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻫﺬ ﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﻗﺒـ ﹶﻞ ﻚ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﻉ ﺫﻟ
ﻭﱂ ﻳﺒﻴﻦ ﻫﻞ ﲰﺎ
ﺝ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺗﺼﺮﳛﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺑـﺄﻥ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﺃﻭ ﺑﻌﺪﻩ؟ ﻓﻴﺒﻴﻨ ﻪ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﺮ
ﻳﺮﻭﻳ ﻪ ﻋﻨ ﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳ ﹺﻖ ﻣ ﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺴﻤ ﻊ ﻣﻨ ﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻗﺒ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻻﺧـﺘﻼﻁ،
ﺲ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻨﻌﻨﺔ ،ﻓﲑﻭﻳ ﻪﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﹶﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻭﻯ ﰲ "ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴ ﹺﺢ" ﻋﻦ ﻣﺪّﻟ ﹴ
ﻉ ﻓﻬﺎﺗﺎ ﻥ ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺗﺎﻥ ﺟﻠﻴﻠﺘﺎﻥ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺼﺮﻳ ﹺﺢ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎ ﹺ
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨ ﹺﺮ
ﻚ ﻏ ﲑ ﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴ ﹺﺢ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟ ﻒ ﰲ ﺻﺤ ﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺭ ﹺﻭ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻧﺘﻮﻗ
ﻱ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺴﻠ ﹴﻢ ﺃﻧ ﻪ ﲔ ﻭﻧﻘﻮ ﹸﻝ :ﻟﻮﱂ ﻳﻄﹼﻠﻊ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﹸﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ﻣﺒ ﹴ
ﺲ ﲰ ﻊ ﱂ ﻳﺨﺮﹺﺟﺎ ﻩ.ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨ ﻪ ﻗﺒ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻁ ،ﻭﹶﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺍﳌﺪﻟ
ﻱ ﻋﻦ ﻣﺒﻬ ﹴﻢ ﻛﺄﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﻓـﻼ ﹲﻥ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﺃﹶﻥ ﻳﺮﻭ
ﺃﻭ ﺭﺟ ﹲﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻓﻼ ﹲﻥ ﻭﻏﲑ ﻩ ﺃﻭ ﻏ ﲑ ﻭﺍﺣ ﺪ ﺃﻭ ﳓ ﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻌﻴﻨـ ﻪ
ﺝ.
ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨﺮ
ﻱ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻬ ﻤ ﹴﻞ ﳓ ﻮ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﳏﻤ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻏ ﹺﲑ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﺃﹶﻥ ﻳﺮﻭ
ﺫﻛ ﹺﺮ ﻣﺎ ﳝﻴﺰ ﻩ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑ ﻩ ﻣ ﻦ ﺍﶈ ﻤﺪﻳ ﻦ ﻭﻳﻜﻮ ﹸﻥ ﰲ ﻣﺸﺎﻳ ﹺﺦ ﻣ ﻦ
ﻚ ﻣــﻦ ﻳــﺸﺎﺭﻛ ﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺳــﻢﹺ ،ﻓﻴﻤﻴــﺰ ﻩ ﺭﻭﺍ ﻩ ﻛــﺬﻟ
- 51 -
ﺐ
ﺝ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻧﺎﻓﻊ ﺟ ﺪﺍ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﹸﻪ ﰲ ﺗـﺪﺭﻳ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﺨ ﹺﺮ
ﺕ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﳏﻠﱠﻬﺎ.ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻱ ﻭﻏﲑﹺﻩ ،ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﺍ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻋﺪ ﻡ ﻭﺭﻭ ﺩ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﻣﺴﻤﻰ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻓﻴﺤﺘﻤﻞ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ ،ﺇﻣﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﱂ ﳛﻔﻆ ﺍﲰﻪ ﻭﺇﻣـﺎ
ﻷﻧﻪ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﻜﺜﺮﺓ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﲰﻌﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑﻦ
ﺳﻌﺪ ﻭﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ،ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﺍﻟﻜﻼﻡ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻣﻔﺼﻼ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ.
ﺚ ﻇﹸﻠﻤﺎ ﲟﺎ ﻻ ﳛﻖ ﳍـﻢ ﻭﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﹶ
ﻭﻟﻴﺴﻮﺍ ﺃﻫﻠﹶﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺮﺍﻡ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﺎﺋ ﹺﺮ ﺍ ﻤ ﹺﻊ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺎ ﺩﻋﻮﺍ
ﻒ ﻷﺟ ﹺﻞ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺿﻌﻴ
ﺲ
ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻂ ﺑﺂﺧﺮ ﺓ ﺃﻱ ﰲ ﺀﺍﺧﺮ ﺃﻣﺮﹺﻩ ﻭﻋﻤﺮﻩ ،ﻭﺃﻧـﻪ ﻣـﺪّﻟ
ﻑ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻣﺮ.ﻣﻌﺮﻭ
ﺏ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﲟﺴﺎﺋﻞﹶ ،ﻣﻨﻬﺎ:
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺮﺩﻭ ﺩ ﻭﺍﳉﻮﺍ
ﺃﻥ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﺛﻘﺔ ﺣﺠﺔ ﺑﻼ
ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ،ﻣﻦ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﻮﻓﺔ ﻭﺃﺛﺒﺎﻢ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻧـﻪ ﺷـﺎﺥ
ﻭﻧﺴ ﻲ ﻭﱂ ﳜﺘﻠﻂ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
- 52 -
ﻭﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ "ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ﺍﳌﺘﻜﻠﱠﻢ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﲟﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺐ ﺍﻟـﺮﺩ"
ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ:
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ )ﻉ( ﺛﻘﺔ ﺗﻐﲑ
ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﻮﺗﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟ ﻜﺒﺮ ﻭﺳﺎﺀ ﺣﻔﻈﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﻭﺭﻣﺰ ﻟﻪ ﲝـﺮﻑ
)ﻉ( ﺃﻱ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹶﻪ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﻋﺔ.
ﻭﺳﻠﹼﻢ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﰲ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃـﻪ ﻗـﺎﻝ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ:
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌ ﻲ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻂ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻭﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻥ ﲰﺎﻉ
ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻂ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﺑـﻮ ﻳﻌﻠـﻰ
ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻠ ﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻣﻮ ﺭ:
ﺃﺣ ﺪﻫﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺷﺎﺥ
ﻭﻧﺴ ﻲ ﻭﱂ ﳜﺘﻠﻂ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻭﻗﺪ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻭﻗـﺪ
ﺗﻐﲑ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ.
ﻉ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨ ﹶﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﻒ ﺫﻛ ﺮ ﻛﻮ ﹶﻥ ﲰﺎ ﹺ
ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻬﺎ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﳌﺼﻨ
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻂ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺮﻳﺾ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺴﻦ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫ ﹺﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ﹺﻢ
- 53 -
ﺃﺧﺬ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻻﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺻﺮﳛﺎ ﰱ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻗـﺎﻝ
ﻳﻌﻘﻮﺏ ﺍﻟﻔﺴﻮﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﺛﻨﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﰱ ﺍﳌﺴﺠﺪ
ﺴﻮﻱ :ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺛﺎﻟﺚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟ ﹶﻔ
ﻗﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻂ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﻮﻩ ﻣﻊ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻻﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ
ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻗﻲ.
ﺏ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﻁ ﺍﳌﻨﺴﻮ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ ﹸ
ﻆ ﺍﳉﻠﻴـ ﹸﻞ
ﺑﻪ ،ﺑﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎ ُﺀ ﳏﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳ ﹺﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺋ ﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻄﲔ:
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺳﻌﻴ ﺪ ﺻﻼ
ﻁ ﺃﰊ
ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌﺘﱪ ﺃﺣ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﺋﻤ ﺔ ﻣﺎ ﹸﺫﻛﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺧـﺘﻼ
ﻂ
ﻕ ،ﺍﺣﺘﺠﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﻠ ﹰﻘﺎ ﻭﺫﻟﻚ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ ﳜﺘﻠ ﹾ
ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﰲ ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ ﻣﻦ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪِ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺴﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﺴ ﻢ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻄﲔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺋ ﻲ ﻫﻢ :ﻣﻦ ﱂ
ﻂ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺘﻪ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻟ ﻘﺼﺮ
ﺤﱠﺐ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻪ ﺿﻌ ﹰﻔﺎ ﺃﺻﻼ ﻭﱂ ﻳ
ﻳﻮ ﹺﺟ
ﻁ ﻭﻗﻠﺘﻪ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﻷﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺮﻭ ﺷﻴﹰﺌﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ، ﻣﺪ ﺓ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ
ﻓﺴﻠﻢ ﺣﺪﻳﹸﺜﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻢ.
- 54 -
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻮﻃ ﻲ ﰲ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻱ:
)ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ( ﻋﻤﺮﻭ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ )ﺍﻟـﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ(
ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻂ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻭﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺷﺎﺥ ﻭﻧـﺴﻲ ﻭﱂ
ﳜﺘﻠﻂ )ﻭﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﲰﺎﻉ( ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ )ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃـﻪ(
ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﳋﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﱂ ﳜﺮﺝ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﺨﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻨـﻪ
ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻐﲑ ﻗﻠﻴﻼ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍ ِﻹﺑﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔﻴﺎﺡ ﻣـﻦ ﻋﻠـﻮ ﹺﻡ ﺍﺑـ ﹺﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺡ:
ﺐ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻼ ﹶﻃﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺷﺎﺥ ﻭﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﱂﻭﺃﻧﻜﺮ ﺻﺎﺣ
ﳜﺘﻠﻂ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻭﻗﺪ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺳﻔﻴﺎ ﹸﻥ ﺑ ﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨـﺔ ﻭﻗـﺪ ﺗﻐـﲑ
ﻗﻠﻴﻼ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺗﻨﺒﻴ ﻪ) :ﺍﻹﺑﻨﺎﺳﻲ( ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻤﻲ ﰲ ﺫﻳﻞ ﹸﻟ
ﺐ ﺍﻟﻠﹸﺒﺎﺏ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ
ﺱ
ﺝ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﻭ ﹺ
ﺺ ﰲ ﺗﺎ ﹺ ﺑﻔﺘﺢ ﺍﳍﻤﺰﺓ ﻧﺴﺒﺔ ﺇﱃ ﻗﺮﻳ ﺔ ﲟﺼﺮ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻧ
ﺑﺄﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻜﺴﺮ ﻭﺃﺻﻠﻬﺎ ﺇﺑﻨﻬﺲ.
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﻳﻘﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺴﺎﻫ ﹸﻞ ﰲ ﻣﺜ ﹺﻞ ﻫـﺬﺍ ،ﻛـﺎﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﻢ ﰲ
"ﺍﻟﻘﹶﺴﻄﻼﱐ" ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
- 55 -
ﻓﻜﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﻯ ﻓﺎﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻤﻠﻮﺍ ﺑﺪﻋﻮﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ﺑـﻞ
ﻆ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺋﻲ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞﺍﺣﺘﺠﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﻻ ﻳﻀ ﺮ ﻓﻤﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﻗﺪ ﺯﺍﻟﺖ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ
ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﳑﻦ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﻭﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻮﺍﺋﺪ:
ﻁ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻟﺜﺒﻮﺎ
ﺍﻷﻭﱃ :ﺍﻧﺘﻔﺎ ُﺀ ﺧﺸﻴ ﺔ ﺍﻻﺧﺘﻼ
ﻋﻨﻪ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺩﻋﻮﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ،ﻓﺒ ﹶﻄﻠﹶﺖ ﺃﻭﱃ ﺣﺠ ﹺﺞ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ.
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺘ ﹶﺔ ﺗﺼﺤﻴ ﺢ ﻟﻠﺮﻭﺍﻳﺎﺕ
ﻉ ﻣﻦ ﻗﻴﻞ ﺇﻧﻪ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ﻷﺎ ﺩﻟﺖ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﲰﺎ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺿﺒﻄﻪ ﻭﺬﺍ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻟـﺸﻚ ﻭﺗـﺼﲑ
ﻛﻐﲑﻫﺎ ﺻﺤﻴﺤ ﹰﺔ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻ ﺎ ،ﻛﻤﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻳﺘﻘﻮﻯ
ﺑﺎﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻟﺬﺍﺗﻪ ﻓﲑﺗﻘﻲ ﻭﻳﺼﲑ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺎ ﻟﻐﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻭﻣﻊ
ﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺩﺏ ﺍﳌﻔﺮﺩ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﺔ ﻷﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ّﹺ
ﻗﺪ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ،ﻓﺒ ﹶﻄﻠﹶﺖ ﺛﺎﱐ ﺣﺠ ﹺﺞ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ.
ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﻣﻦ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ
ﺛﻘﺔ ﺿﺎﺑﻄﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﰲ ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ:
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻼ ُﺀ ﺑﻦ ﺳﺎﱂ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺶ ﻳﺘﻌﺠﺐ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻔـﻆ
ﻕ ﻟﺮﺟﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ.
ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
- 56 -
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜﺔ :ﺃﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺬﻛ ﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺪﻟﻴﺴِﻪ ﻓﻤﺮﺩﻭﺩ ﺑﺄﻣﺮﻳﻦ:
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﺃﻧﻪ ﺛﺒﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ:
ﻕ ﻭﻗﺘـﺎﺩﺓﹶ،
ﺶ ﻭﺃﰊ ﺇﺳـﺤﺎ ﺲ ﺛﻼﺛﺔ ﺍﻷﻋﻤ ﹺ ﻛﻔﻴﺘﻜﻢ ﺗﺪﻟﻴ
ﺚ ﺣﺠ ﹺﺞ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ.
ﻓﺒ ﹶﻄﻠﹶﺖ ﺛﺎﻟ ﹸ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ :ﻗﻠﺖ ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﺓ ﺣـﺴﻨ ﹲﺔ ﰲ
ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺍﻟﺜﻼﺛﺔ ﺃﺎ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺟﺎﺀﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﺩﻟﺖ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻉ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻌﻨﻌﻨﺔ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻗﻮﻟﹸﻪ :ﻣﻌﻨﻌﻨ ﹰﺔ ﺃﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻫﺎ ﺑﻠﻔﻆ "ﻋﻦ" ﻭﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻳﺘﻤﺴﻚ
ﻉ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭ ﺩ ﺍﻹﻣـﺎ ﻡ
ﺎ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﲝﺠﺔ ﻋﺪ ﹺﻡ ﺗﺼﺮﳛ ﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﺴﻤﺎ ﹺ
ﺲ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ.ﺷﻌﺒ ﹸﺔ ﺷﺒ ﻬﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺗﺪﻟﻴ
ﺲ
ﺲ ﻳ ﺮ ﺩ ﺇﲨﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺇﱃ ﺃﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﳘﺎ :ﺗـﺪﻟﻴ
ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴ
ﺲ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎ ﺩ ﺫﻛﺮﳘﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﻴ ﹸﻘﻮﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺗﻔﺼﻴ ﹴﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮﺥ ﻭﺗﺪﻟﻴ
ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ:
ﺦ ﻭﺃ ﹾﻥ
ﻁ ﻟﻠﺸﻴ ﹺﺍﻷﻭ ﹸﻝ ﺍﻹﺳﻘـﺎ ﹸ
ﻱ ﻋﻤﻦ ﻓﻮ ﹶﻗ ﻪ ﺑ ﻌ ﻦ ﻭﺃﻥ
ﻳﺮﻭ
ﻒ
ﺼ
ﻭﺍﻟﺜﺎ ﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺴ ﻘ ﹸﻄ ﻪ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳ
ﻑ
ﺃﻭﺻﺎﻓﹶـ ﻪ ﲟﺎ ﺑ ﻪ ﻻ ﻳﻨﻌ ﹺﺮ
- 57 -
ﻉ ﺍﻷﻭ ﹸﻝ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣ ﹾﺬﻓﹸﻪ ﺍﻟﺸﻴ ﺦ ﺍﻟـﺬﻱ ﲰـﻊ ﻣﻨـﻪ ﻓﺎﻟﻨﻮ
ﻑ "ﺑﺸﺮﻁ ﻋﻠـ ﹺﻢ ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺷﻴﺨﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﶈﺬﻭ
ﻼ ﺧﻔﻴﺎ.
ﺍﻟﹸﻠ ﻘ ﻲ" ﺃﻣﺎ ﺇﻥ ﱂ ﻳﻠﻘﹶﻪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻋﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻓﻴﺼ ﲑ ﻣﺮ ﺳ ﹰ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺃﺑـﻲ ﺇﺳﺤـﺎﻕ ﻋـﻦ ﻋﺒــ ﺪ
ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﻷﻥ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌ ﺪ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨـﻪ
ﺃﺭﺑﻌ ﹲﺔ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻫﻢ:
ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺮ ،ﻭﲪﺎﺩ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺳـﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺃﺑـﻮ
ﰲ ،ﻭﺃﺑـﻮ ﺇﺳـﺤﺎﻕ
ﻕ ﺍﻟﻜﻮ ﱡ
ﺷﻴﺒﺔ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ.
ﺖ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻣﻨﺼﻮ ﺭ ﺑ ﻦ ﺍﳌﻌﺘﻤﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺛﻘﺔ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳ
ﻕ ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﹲﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﱂ ﺃﺟ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻛ ﺮ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋـﻦ ﻷﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﻣﻨﺼﻮ ﹴﺭ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘﺎﺕ ،ﺇﳕﺎ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻨـﺼﻮ ﺭ ﻋـﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ،ﰒ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﻣﻨﺼﻮ ﹴﺭ ﺍﻟﻄﺒﻘ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﲰﻌﺖ ﻣـﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﻱ
ﻕ ﻭﺍﻟﺜـﻮﺭ ّﹺﺲ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳـﺤﺎ
ﻕ ﻛﺈﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴ ﹶﻞ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻳﻮﻧ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﺶ ﻭﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻴﻴﻨﺔ.ﻭﺍﻷﻋﻤ ﹺ
- 58 -
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﲪﺎﺩ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﻷﰊ ﺇﺳـﺤﺎﻕ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻻ ﻟﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ
ﺴﻴﺮ :ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻮ ﺑـﺎﳌﻜﺜﺮ
ﻓﻘﻪ ﻗﻠﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺍﻟ ِ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ،ﻻﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﺕ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻕ ﱂ ﻳﺮﻭ ﻋﻨﻪ
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺷﻴﺒﺔ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺮ ﹺﻭ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺷﻴﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ.
ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻻ ﻭﺟ ﻪ ﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﺴﻪ ﺇﺫﻥ ﲝﻤـﺪ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﻋﺒـﺪ
ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻜﺜﺮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺑﻞ ﻫـﻮ ﻗﻠﻴـﻞ
ﺲ ﻟﺪﻟﱠﺲ ﻋﻦ ﻏـﲑﹺﻩ ﺃﻱ
ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻓﻠﻮ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴ
ﻟﻜﺎﻥ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻤﻦ ﲰﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﺒ ﺪ
ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺑ ﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﻣ ﻦ ﺍﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﻳﻦ.
ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﹸ
ﺚ ﺍﻹﲨﺎ ﹸﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ،ﻗﺪ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹸﻥ ﻫﻨـﺎﻙ
ﺭﺍ ﹴﻭ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺟﻞﹴ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﻻ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﻧﻪ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻗﻠﻴـ ﹲﻞ ﺟـﺪﺍ،
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﺧ ﹸﻞ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻻﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹺﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻠ ﹺﻲّ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻔﻴ ﺪﻧﺎ ﺷـﻴﺌﹰﺎ
ﺖ
ﻫﻨﺎ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﻘﺎ ﻡ ﻧﻔ ﹴﻲ ﻭﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ،ﻭﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺎﻟﲔ :ﺇﻥ ﻛﻨـ
ﻼ ﻓﺎﻟﺼﺤﺔ ،ﺃﻭ ﻣ ﺪ ﻋﻴﺎ ﻓﺎﻟﺪﻟﻴﻞ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﻗﺎﻋـﺪ ﹲﺓ ﻣﻘـﺮﺭ ﹲﺓﻧﺎﻗ ﹰ
- 59 -
ﲡﺪﻫﺎ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻷﺻﻮ ﹺﻝ ﻭﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﳉـﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﳌﻨـﺎﻇﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺍﷲ
ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﻭﻳﻜﻔﻲ ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﺣﺼﺮﹺﻫﻢ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﺜﻼﺛ ﺔ
ﺴ ﻪﻏ ﹺﲑ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ :ﻗﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﺬﺍ ﳐ ﺮ ﺟ ﻪ ﺳﻮﺍ ٌﺀ ﺩﹼﻟ
ﺃﻡ ﻻ ،ﻓﺰﺍﻟﺖ ﺷﺒﻬ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﺲ.
ﻉ
ﺕ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ ﲰﺎ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﱡﻪ ﺩﻭ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻼ ﹺﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺇﺛﺒﺎ
ﺚ ﺩﻭ ﹶﻥ ﺗﺪﻟﻴﺲ.
ﻕ ﻟﻠﺤﺪﻳ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﻒ ﺍﻟـﺮﺍﻭﻱ،ﺲ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻟﻪ ﺃﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﺿـﻌ ﻭﺗﺪﻟﻴ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻋﻠﻮ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻌﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺇﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺇﺫ ﻻ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﺪﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ ﻟﻠﺘﺪﻟﻴﺲ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺗﺪﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮﺥ ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﺃﻥ ﻳﺼﻒ ﺷﻴﺨﻪ ﺑﻮﺻﻒ ﻻ ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﺮﻳﺪ ﺑـﺬﻟﻚ ﺇﻣـﺎ
ﺍﻹﻛﺜﺎ ﺭ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﲝﻴﺚ ﻳﻈﻬ ﺮ ﺗﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﻟﺸﻴﻮﺥ ﻭﻳﻜـﻮﻥ ﰲ
ﺍﳊﻘﻴﻘﺔ ﺷﻴﺨﺎ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍ ،ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻐﲑ ﻭﺻﻔﻪ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ ﺿـﻌﻔﻪ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺛﻘﺔ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻴﻈﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﹴﻭ ﺀﺍﺧﺮ ،ﺃﻭ ﺑﺴﺒﺐ
ﺻ ﻐﺮﹺﻩ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻉ ﻗﻄﻌﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻘﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ.
- 60 -
ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲢﺮﻳﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺎ ﻳﺰﻭﻝ ﻛﻞ
ﺇﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺗﺪﻟﻴﺲ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ.
ﻓﺎﺋﺪﺓ ﻣﻬﻤﺔ:
ﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﻗﻮﺍﻋ ﺪ ﰲ ﻋﻠ ﹺﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺗﺬﻛﹶﺮ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ
ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﺀﺍﺕ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻣﺮ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻔـﻦ،
ﺲ ﺍﻷﻋﻤﺶ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻟﻜﻦ ﻳﺴﺘﺜﲎ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣـﺎ ﻓﻤﺜﻼ ﺗﺪﻟﻴ
ﻱ ﻭﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﲔ ﻓﻴﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻉﹺ، ﺃﺛﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ
ﺥ
ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺺ ﺣﺎﻓﻆ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤﺘﻪ ،ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺴﺘﺜﲎ ﰲ ﺷﻴﻮ ﹴ
ﻟﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ :ﻣﱴ ﻗﺎﻝ "ﻋﻦ" ﺗﻄـﺮﻕ ﺇﱃ
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴﺲ ﺇﻻ ﰲ ﺷﻴﻮﺥ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ :ﻛـﺈﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ،
ﻭﺃﰊ ﻭﺍﺋﻞ ،ﻭﺃﰊ ﺻﺎﱀ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻥ ،ﻓﺈﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘـﻪ ﻋـﻦ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﺼﻨﻒ ﳏﻤﻮﻟﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻻﺗﺼﺎﻝ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺍﻟ
- 61 -
ﷲ ﻣﺼﻴﺒ ﹲﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻦ ﻓﻘﺪ ﲡﺮﺃ ﻣـﻦ ﻭﻣﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻭﺍ ِ
ﻒ ،ﻓﻴﻨﻈـ ﺮﺾ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴ ﹺﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻀﻌﻴ ﻗﺮﺃ ﺑﻌ
ﻼ ﻓﲑﻯ ﺃﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻱ ﻣـﺪّﻟﺲ ،ﻓـﲑ ﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﲔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﻋﻮﻯ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ﺍﳌﺴﻜ
ﻼ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨـﻪ ﺣـﺪﻳﺜﹰﺎ ﺃﻭ ﻋﻦ ﻓﻼ ﻥ ﻻ ﻳﺪّﻟﺲ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺣﺪﻳﺜﲔ ،ﺃﻭ ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﻧﻔﺴِﻪ ﻏ ﲑ ﻣﺸﻬﻮ ﹴﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﺑﻞ ﻗـﺪ
ﻳﻜﻮ ﹸﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺃﺷﻬ ﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍ ﺓ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺭﺍﺩﺕ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹶﻪ
ﺲ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﷲ
ﺗﺄﰐ ﺇﱃ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳌﺪﻟّﺲ ،ﻓﺄﻧﻰ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺪﻟﻴ
ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﺼﻴﺒﺔ.
ﻓﻔﺮﻕ ﻛﺒﲑ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﺓ ﻋﻤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺑﲔ ﻣﺎ ﻳـﺴﺘﺜﲎ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺄﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ – ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻠﹼﻤﻨﺎ ﺗﻨـ ﺰﻻ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻠﻂ –
ﻆ
ﻆ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺋ ﻲ ﻭﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸﻓﻴﺴﺘﺜﲎ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﺪﳘﺎ ﺍﺑـﻦ ﺍﻟﻜﻴـﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﺍﻛـﺐ
ﺍﻟﻨﲑﺍﺕ:
ﺠﻠﻲ ﻭﺃﺑـﻮ ﺣـﺎ ﹴﰎ
ﺃﻃﻠﻖ ﳛﲕ ﺑ ﻦ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋ ﻲ ﻭﺍﻟ ﻌ
ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺘﻮﺛﻴﻘﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
- 62 -
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩ ﰲ ﺃﺋﻤﺔ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ ﻭﺣﻔﺎﻇﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺛﺒـﺖ
ﲝﻤﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺣﺎ ﹴﻝ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﳍﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃﻪ ﻭﻫﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ،ﻓـﺪﻋﻮﻯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻃـﻪ
ﺑﺎﻃﻠ ﹲﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ.
ﺶ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﹸﺔ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﻨ ﹴ
ﺏ ﻋﻤ ﹺﻞ
ﺴﻨ ّﹺﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎ ﹺ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺍﻟ
ﺍﻟﻴﻮ ﹺﻡ ﻭﺍﻟﻠﻴﻠ ﺔ:
ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺧﺎﻟﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺮﺫﹶﻋﻲ ﺛﻨـﺎ ﺣﺎﺟـﺐ ﺑـﻦ
ﻕ
ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺛﻨﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ ﺛﻨﺎ ﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴ ﹸﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻛﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑـﻦ ﻋﻤـﺮ
ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻓﺨﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺟﻠﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻟﻪ ﺭﺟﻞ :ﺍﺫﻛـﺮ
ﺃﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ.
ﻂ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻘﺎﻝ( ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺸﹶ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻓﻘﺎﻡ ﻓﻜﺄﳕﺎ ﻧ
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﻴﺔ ﻻ ﻳﻨـﺰﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺗﺒﺔ
ﺐ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﺜﻘـﺔ
ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺿﻌﻔﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ ﲝﺎﺟ ﹺ
ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﰒ ﲟﺤﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻗـﺴﺎﱐ ﻭﺃﰊ ﺇﺳـﺤﺎﻕ
- 63 -
ﻭﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﱄ:
ﺐ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﺛﻘ ﹲﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺳـﲑ ﺃﻋـﻼﻡ ﺣﺎﺟ
ﺍﻟﻨﺒﻼﺀ :ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﻟﺮﺣﺎﻝ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹰﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻋـﻦ
ﺾ ﻛﻌﺒـﺪ ﳘﻪ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﻔﺮ ﺩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻌ ﹺ
ﻭﻛﻴﻊ ﻓﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻗﻄﲏ ﺑﻮ
ﺍﻴﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺭﻭﺍﺩ ﺑﺄﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻻ ﻳﺮﻭﻳﻬﺎ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺍﻗـ ﻊ ﰲ
ﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﺓ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﹰـﺎ ﻭﻗـﺎﻝ ﺍﻟـﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺃﻏﻠ ﹺ
ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺷﻒ :ﺛﻘﺔ ،ﻓﻼ ﻳﺼﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﺑﻌﺒﺎﺭﺓ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ :ﺻـﺪﻭﻕ
ﺙ ﻓﻴﺨﻄﺊﹸ ،ﺇﳕـﺎﺐ ﳑﻦ ﳛ ّﺪ ﹸﺖ ﺃﻋﺠ ﻳ ﹺﻬﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﲔ :ﻟﺴ
ﺙ ﻓﻴﺼﻴﺐ ،ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻪ :ﻣﻦ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺃﻧـﻪ ﺐ ﳑﻦ ﳛ ّﺪ ﹸ
ﺍﻟﻌﺠ
ﺙ ﻭﻻ ﳜﻄ ﹸﺊ ﻓﻬﻮ ﻛﺬﹼﺍﺏ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺻﺤﺢ ﻟﻪ ﺷﻴﺨﻬﻢ ﳛ ّﺪ ﹸ
ﺚ ﰲ ﺳﻨﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ،ﻓﺴﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈﻴﻢ، ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎﱐ ﲬﺴﺔﹶ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﹶ
ﻫﺆﻻ ِﺀ ﲨﺎﻋ ﹲﺔ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻴﻬﻢ ﻭﺍﺣ ﺪ ﺃﻫ ﹲﻞ ﻟﻠﺘﺼﺤﻴ ﹺﺢ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻀﻌﻴﻒ.
- 64 -
ﺍﻟﻮﺳﻄﻰ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺩﻭﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺫﻟـﻚ ،ﺑـﻞ
ﺻﺤﺢ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ.
ﺐ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺬﻛ ﺮ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺿ ﻌﻔﹶﻪ
ﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﻟﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠ ﹺ
ﲔ ﻟﻪ ،ﻭﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩ ﹸﺓ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺟﺪﻳـﺪ ﹰﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﻭﻥ ﺫﻛ ﹺﺮ ﺍﳌﻌ ﺪّﻟ
ﻓﻄﺎﳌﺎ ﻓﻌﻠﻮﺍ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﺸﻰﺀ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﺪﻱ :ﶈﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺍ َﻷﻭﺯﺍﻋ ّﹺﻲ ﻭﻋﻦ
ﺱ.
ﺚ ﺻﺎﳊ ﹲﺔ ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﺑﺄ
ﻏﲑﻩ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﹸ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ :ﻻ ﺑﺄﺱ ﺑﻪ.
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺑﻞ ﺍﺣﺘﺞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻪ ﰲ ﻋﺪﺓ
ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ،ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﰲ ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﺳﺤﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻫﺎﻧﺊ ،ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﺳﺤﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻫﺎﻧﺊ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﱄ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺘﺎﺏ ﺣﺪﺛﲏ ﳏﻤﺪ
ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻗﺴﺎﱐ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺳﺤﻴﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻫﺎﻧﺊ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﳚﺎﻟﺲ
ﺍﻻﻭﺯﺍﻋ ﻲ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺛﻘﺔً.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺚ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻪ ﻷﻥ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﳌـﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳊـﺪﻳ
ﺍﺣﺘ ﺞ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻋﺘﻤﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻖ ﺭﺟﻞﹴ ،ﻭﺗﻮﺛﻴ ﻖ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻻ
ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻓﺪ ﹼﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺛﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻧﻌﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻼ.
- 65 -
ﻭﺃﻭﺳﻂ ﺍﻷﻗﻮﺍﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺣﻜﺎﻫﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﰲ
ﺍﻟﺘﻘﺮﻳﺐ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﺪﻭﻕ ﻛﺜﲑ ﺍﳋﻄﺄ .ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺨـﺎﺭﻱ:
ﻛﺎﻥ ﳛﲕ ﺑ ﻦ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻳﺴﻲ ُﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺃﻱ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﳛﲕ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻌﲔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳌﺘﺸﺪﺩﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫـﻮ
ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎﰎ :ﻗﻠﺖ ﻷﰊ ﺯﺭﻋـ ﹶﺔ :ﳏﻤـ ﺪ ﺑـﻦ
ﺐ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﻗﺎﻝ ﳏﻤ ﺪ ﺑـﻦ
ﺐ ﻭﻋﻠ ﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺎﺻ ﹴﻢ ﺃﻳﻬﻤﺎ ﺃﺣ
ﻣﺼﻌ ﹴ
ﻣﺼﻌﺐ.
ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﻟﻪ ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ ﰲ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﺭﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﳏﻤـﺪ ﺑـﻦ
ﻣﺼﻌﺐ ﺛﻘﺔ ،ﰒ ﺻﺤﺢ ﻟﻪ ﻋﺪﺓ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻓﺨﺎﻟﻔﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ
ﺗﻠﺨﻴﺼﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻔﻪ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣﺮ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﺎ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻔﺎ ﺧﻔﻴﻔﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﻣ ﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﺗﻔﺼﻴﻠﹸﻪ ﺇﻥ ﺷـﺎﺀ
ﺍﷲ.
ﺚ ﺍﻻﺻـﻄﻔﺎﺀ
ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﺯﺍﻋﻲ ﺣﺪﻳ ﹶ
ﺶ ﺑﲏ ﻫﺎﺷﻢ ﻭﺍﺻﻄﻔﺎﱐ ﻣﻦ ﺑـﲏﻭﻓﻴﻪ :ﻭﺍﺻﻄﻔﻰ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺮﻳ ﹴ
ﻫﺎﺷ ﹴﻢ.
- 66 -
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ
ﱐ ﻭﺍﺣﺘﺞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑـ ﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴـﺔ
ﻭﺻﺤﺢ ﻟﻪ ﺷﻴﺨﻬﻢ ﺍﻷﻟﺒﺎ ﱡ
ﺇﻣﺎﻣﻬﻢ ﻭﺃﻗ ﺮ ﺗﺼﺤﻴ ﺢ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ.
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﻣﻐﻠﹶﻄﺎﻱ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺳﻨﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﻪ ﻋـﻦ
ﺣﺪﻳﺚ:
ﻑ ﰲ ﺣﺎﻝ "ﻛﺜ ﹴﲑ" ﻓﺈﻧـﻪ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺣﺴﻦ ،ﻟﻼﺧﺘﻼ
ﻱ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹰﺎ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﳑﻦ ﺻﺤﺢ ﻟﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬ
ﻒ
ﻕ ﳜﻄ ﹸﺊ ،ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠـ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹸﻪ ﺣﺴ ﻦ ﺻﺪﻭ
ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺜﻠﹸﻪ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹸﻥ ﺣﺪﻳﺜﹸﻪ ﺣﺴﻨﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﻻﺣﻘﹰﺎ ﺑـﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ،
ﻓﻤﱴ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﻓﻖ ﻏﲑﻩ ﺯﺍﻝ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻒ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﺋﻤـﺔ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻭﻻ ﺟﺪﺍﻝ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻻ ﻓﺮﻕ ﺑﲔ ﻛﻮﻧﹺﻪ ﻭﺍﻓ ﻖ ﻏﲑﻩ
ﰲ ﺍﳌﺘﺎﺑﻌﺎﺕ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﻮﺍﻫﺪ.
ﺨ ّﹺﺮﺟـﺎ:
ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻤﻲ ﰲ ﳎﻤﻊ ﺍﻟﺰﻭﺍﺋﺪ ﻣ
ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻦ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﻞ ﻭﻫـﻮ ﺳـﻴﺊ
ﺍﳊﻔﻆ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻣﺬﻱ :ﺻﺪﻭﻕ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﻜﻠﻢ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺑﻌﺾ ﺃﻫـﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﻭﲰﻌﺖ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺇﲰﺎﻋﻴـﻞ -ﻳﻌـﲏ
ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ -ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻛﺎﻥ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺒﻞ ﻭﺇﺳـﺤﺎﻕ ﺑـﻦ
- 67 -
ﺇﺑﺮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻭﺍﳊﻤﻴﺪﻱ ﳛﺘﺠﻮﻥ ﲝﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻘﻴـﻞ .ﻗﻠـﺖ:
)ﻓﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺣﺴﻦ( ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ :ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﻳﻌﻠﻰ ﻭﺍﻟﻄـﱪﺍﱐ
ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﻀﻞ ﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﻝ :ﳜﻄﺊ ﻭﺿﻌﻔﻪ
ﲨﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﳍﻴﻌﺔ )ﻓﺎﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺣﺴﻦ(.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﲔ ﻣﺎ ﳓﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ،ﻓﻬﻨﺎ ﻻ ﻳﻨـﺰﻝﻗﻠﺖ ﻭﷲ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﻋ
ﳊﺴﻦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻝ ﻟﺜﺒﻮﺕ ﺣﻔﻈﻪ ﳌﺎ ﺭﻭﻯ ،ﻭﻻ ﺃﺭﺍﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍ ﹸ
ﺇﻻ ﺿﺒﻄﻪ ﺑﻜﻞ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺇﺫ ﻗﺪ ﺻﺮﺡ ﺑﺎﻟﺘﺤﺪﻳﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺇﺳﺮﺍﺋﻴﻞ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻻ ﳏﺎﻟﺔ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻢ ﻟﻠﻬﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳ ﹺﻖ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﺳـﻠﻤ ﹶﺔ ﺑـﻦ ﹸﻛﻬﻴـﻞ،
ﻭﺑﺎﻟﺒﺪﻳﻬﺔ ﻻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﳏﻤﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺑـﻦ
ﻛﹸﻬﻴﻞ ،ﻓﺮﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻣﻀﺒﻮﻃﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳑﺎ ﻳﺪﻝ ﺑﻘﻠﻴ ﹺﻞ
ﺍﻟﻨﻈﺮ ﺑﻌﲔ ﺍﻹﻧﺼﺎﻑ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻮﻧﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺇﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ
ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ.
- 68 -
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻌ ﹰﺔ ﺗﻐﻨﻴﻨﺎ ﻋﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﻔـﺼﻴﻞ،
ﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ.
ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻨـﺰﻝ ﺇﻥ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﻜﻮﻧﻪ ﳐﻄﺌﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴـﺜﻢ
ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻋﺮﻓﻨﺎ ﳐﺮﺟﻪ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﻋﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺑﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ،ﻭﷲ ﺍﳊﻤ ﺪ ﻭﺍﳌﻨﺔ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻓﻬﻮ ﺛﻘﺔ ﺑﻼ ﺭﻳﺐ ،ﻓـﺴﻴﺄﺗﻴﻚ ﺭ ﺩ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎ ِﺀ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﻢ ﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨـﻬﻤﺎ
ﻭﺣﺞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻓﻘﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻋﻦ
ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﰊ ﺣﻨﻈﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺳﺘﺮﻯ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻘـﻪ
ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻴﻈ ﹺﻬ ﺮ ﺟﻬ ﹶﻞ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﺍﳋﺎﺋﻀﲔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻢ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﻻ ﻫﺪﻯ ،ﻭﺳﺘﺮﻯ ﻛﻴﻒ ﺧﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺃﻣﺎﻧ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ﹺﻢ
ﻱ ﻟﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ ﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩ ّﹺ
ﻭﺍﻗﺘﺼﺮﻭﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﲡﻬﻴ ﹺﻞ ﺍﳋﻄﻴ ﹺ
ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ.
ﻆﻻ
ﺐ ﲨﺎﻋ ﹲﺔ ﳑﻦ ﻟﻴﺴﻮﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻫ ﹺﻞ ﺍﳊﻔـ
ﻭﻗﱠﻠ ﺪ ﺍﳋﻄﻴ
ﺣﺎﺟ ﹶﺔ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺇﱃ ﺫﻛﺮﹺﻫﻢ.
ﻭﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳـﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟـﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﻭﺳﻠﻤ ﹸﺔ ﺑﻦ ﹸﻛ ﻬﻴ ﹴﻞ ،ﻭﺷﻌﺒﺔ – ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑﺖ -ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ
- 69 -
ﺳﺘﺮﺍ ﻩ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ.
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎﰎ :ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﺍﻟﻨﺨﻌـﻲ ﻛـﻮﰲ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ،ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍ ﹶﳍﻤـﺪﺍﱐ –ﺃﻱ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ -ﻭﺳﻠﻤ ﹸﺔ ﺑ ﻦ ﹸﻛﻬﻴ ﹴﻞ ﲰﻌﺖ ﺃﰊ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﲏ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺆﺗﻠﻒ ﻭﺍﳌﺨﺘﻠﻒ :ﺍﳍﻴـﺜﻢ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻗﻄ
ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻨﻈﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﺣﺪﺙ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺑـﻦ
ﻛﻬﻴﻞ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻓﺎﺑﺘﺪﺍ ًﺀ ﻫﻮ ﻟﻴﺲ ﳎﻬﻮ ﹶﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﲔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﲤﺴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﻮﻥ
ﺃﺧﺬﹰﺍ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺇﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺮﻭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﺑﻮ
ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ،ﻓﻬﺬﺍ ﺧﻄﺄ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﻭﳍﺬﺍ ﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻤﺎﺀ
ﺾ ﺍﳌﺨﺘﺼﺮﻳﻦ ﳌﻘﺪﻣ ﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺡ ﺣـﺬﻑ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺒﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺑﻌ
ﺶ ﳑﻦ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳـﺤﺎﻕ
ﺍﺳ ﻢ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﻨ ﹴ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ.
ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ :ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﰲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﳌﻐﻴﺚ :ﻭﻛـﺬﻟﻚ
ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻛﻬﻴﻞ ،ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺑـﻮ
ﺣﺎﰎ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯﻱ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
- 70 -
ﻭﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺍﳌﻠ ﻘّﻦ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﳌﻘﹺﻨﻊ:
ﻭﺫﻛﺮ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺮﻭ "ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ"
ﻏ ﲑ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻳـﻀﺎ
ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﻬﻴﻞ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ ﰲ ﻣﻌﺮﻓ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑ ﺔ :ﺣﻨﻈﻠ ﹸﺔ ﺑـ ﻦ
ﱯ
ﺐ ﺍﻟـﻨ ّﹺ ﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﻤﻴﻤ ﻲ ﻛﺎﺗ ﺻﻴ ﻔ ّﹺﻲ ﺍﻷﺳﻴﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴ ﹺﻊ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ﺮﱠﻗ ﹺﻊ ﺑ ﹺﻦ
ﺻﻴﻔﻲ .ﺭﻭﻯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺃﺧﻲ ﹶﺃﻛﹶﺜ ﻢ ﺑ ﹺﻦ
ﺨ ﹺﲑ ﻭﺍﳌﺮﻗ ﻊ ﺑ ﻦ ﺻﻴﻔ ّﹴﻲﺸ ّ
ﻱ ﻭﻳﺰﻳ ﺪ ﺑ ﻦ ﺍﻟ
ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻋﺜﻤﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ ﻬﺪ
ﻭﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﻢ ﺑ ﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻨﻈﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﻨﻈﻠـ ﹸﺔ ﺑـﻦ
ﻱ )ﻭﳚﻮﺯ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍ ُﻷ ﺳﹺﻴّﺪﻱ( ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﹸﻛﺘـﺎﺏ
ﺭﺑﻴﻌ ﹶﺔ ﺍ ُﻷﺳﻴﺪ
ﺍﻟﻮﺣﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨﻒ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﻭﺍﺑـﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﺷﻴﺒﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺗﺘﺒﻌـﺖ ﻣﺮﻭﻳﺎﺗـﻪ
ﻓﻮﺟﺪﺗﻪ ﺷﺪﻳ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻀﺒﻂ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺑﻀﺒﻂ ﺗﺎﻡ ،ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻪ:
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍﱐ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻌﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ :ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻲ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒـﺪ
ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺣﺬﻳﻔﺔ ﺛﻨﺎ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻛﻬﻴـﻞ
- 71 -
"ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ" :ﻋﻦ ﺣﻨﻈﻠﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻓﻜﻨـﺎ
ﺖ ﻓﺄﺗﻴﺖ ﺃﻫﻠﻲ ﻓﻀﺤﻜﺖ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﻓﻮﻗﻊ ﰲ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻋﲔ ﻓﺨﺮﺟ
ﻧﻔﺴﻲ ﺷﻰﺀ ﻓﻠﻘﻴﺖ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺭﲪﻪ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﺇﱐ ﻧﺎﻓﻘـﺖ
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻭﻣﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ؟ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ :ﻛﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﺬﻛﺮ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﻭﻛﻨﺎ ﻛﹶﺄﻧﺎ ﺭﺃﻱ ﻋﲔ ﻓﺄﺗﻴﺖ ﺃﻫﻠﻲ
ﻓﻀﺤﻜﺖ ﻣﻌﻬﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺇﻧﺎ ﻟﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﺄﺗﻴﺖ ﺍﻟـﻨﱯ
ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﺬﻛﺮﺕ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻳﺎ ﺣﻨﻈﻠﺔ ﻟـﻮ
ﻛﻨﺘﻢ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺃﻫﻠﻴﻜﻢ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻟﺼﺎﻓﺤﺘﻜﻢ ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻜﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻓﺮﺷﻜﻢ ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻄﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻨﻈﻠﺔ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺳﺎﻋﺔ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺃﲪﺪ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻋﺜﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻨﻬـﺪﻱ
ﻋﻦ ﺣﻨﻈﻠﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺎﺗﺐ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﻛﻨﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﺬﻛﺮﻧﺎ ﺍﳉﻨﺔ
ﻱ ﻋﲔ ﻓﺄﺗﻴﺖ ﺃﻫﻠﻲ ﻭﻭﻟﺪﻱ ﻓﻀﺤﻜﺖ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ ﺣﱴ ﻛﺄﻧﺎ ﺭﺃ
ﻭﻟﻌﺒﺖ ﻭﺫﻛﺮﺕ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻓﺨﺮﺟﺖ ﻓﻠﻘﻴﺖ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺑﻜـﺮ
ﺖ ﻧﺎﻓﻘﺖ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺇﻧﺎ ﻟﻨﻔﻌﻠﻪ ﻓﺄﺗﻴﺖ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻓﻘﻠﺖ ﻧﺎﻓﻘ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﺬﻛﺮﺕ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻟﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻨﻈﻠﺔ ﻟـﻮ ﻛﻨـﺘﻢ
- 72 -
ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﻥ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﻮﻧﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ ﻟﺼﺎﻓﺤﺘﻜﻢ ﺍﳌﻼﺋﻜـﺔ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻓﺮﺷﻜﻢ ﺃﻭ ﰲ ﻃﺮﻗﻜﻢ -ﺃﻭ ﻛﻠﻤ ﹰﺔ ﳓﻮ ﻫﺬﺍ -ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ﻗـﺎﻝ
ﻫﻮ ﻳﻌﲏ ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻨﻈﻠﺔ ﺳﺎﻋﺔ ﻭﺳﺎﻋﺔ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻠﻤ ﹶﺔ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻛﻬﻴ ﹴﻞ ﻋﻦ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ :ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭ
ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻋﻦ ﺣﻨﻈﻠ ﹶﺔ ﳓ ﻮﻩ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﹸﻪ ﰲ ـﺬﻳﺐ
ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎ ﹺﻝ ﻟﻠ ﻤﺰﻱ.
ﺕ ﺃﺧـﺮﻯ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﲝﻤﺪ ﺍﷲ ﺿﺒﻂ ﺗﺎﻡ ،ﻭﻫﻨﺎﻙ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎ
ﺗﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﺎ ﹺﻝ ﺿﺒﻄﻪ ،ﻛﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤ ﺮ ﰲ ﺍﳊـﺞ:
ﺖ ﺍﻷﻋ ﺰ ﺍﻷﻛﺮﻡ( .ﻭﻗﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺒﻪ
ﻚ ﺃﻧ
ﺏ ﺍﻏ ﻔ ﺮ ﻭﺍﺭﺣ ﻢ ﺇﻧ
)ﺭ ّﹺ
ﺃﻫ ﹸﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ﹺﻢ ﻛﺎﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌ ّﹺﻲ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻟﻤﺎ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻋـﻦ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﻋﻤﺮ.
ﻆ ﻣ ﻐﻠﹶﻄﺎﻱ )ﻭﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﻣ ﻐﻠﹾﻄـﺎﻱ( ﰲ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﹼﻣ ﹸﺔ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﺷﺮﺡ ﺳﻨﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﻪ:
ﺚ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤ ﺮ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮ ﺭ ﰲ ﻣﺴﻨ ﺪ ﺍﻟـﺴﺮﺍﺝ ﺑـﺴﻨ ﺪ
ﺣﺪﻳ ﹸ
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﻨﺎ ﻧﺼﻠﻲ ﻣﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺀﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ
ﻓﺠﺎﺀ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻓﺪﺧﻞ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺍﷲ ﺃﻛﱪ ،ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ
- 73 -
ﷲ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻭﺳﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺑﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﺃﺻﻴﻼ ،ﻓﻠﻤﺎ ﻗﻀﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺀﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻣﻦ ﺻﺎﺣﺐ ﻛﻼﻡ ﻛـﺬﺍ
ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ :ﺃﻧﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻋﺠﺒﺖ ﳍﺎ ﻓﺘﺤﺖ ﳍﺎ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺏ
ﱯ
ﺖ ﺍﻟـﻨ
ﺍﻟﺴﻤﻮﺍﺕ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ :ﻓﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﺘﻬﻦ ﻣﻨﺬ ﲰﻌـ
ﺻﻠﹼﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺀﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺫﻟﻚ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨﻔﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳـﺤﺎﻕ
ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺭﺃﻯ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺇﱃ ﺟﻨﺒﻪ
ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺃﻛﱪ ،ﺍﷲ ﺃﻛﱪ ﻛﺒﲑﺍ ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﻛﺜﲑﺍ ﻭﺳـﺒﺤﺎﻥ
ﱄ ﻭﺃﺣـﺴ ﻦﺐ ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ ﺇ ﹼ
ﻚ ﺃﺣ
ﺍﷲ ﺑﻜﺮﺓ ﻭﺃﺻﻴﻼ ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﺟ ﻌ ﹾﻠ
ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺪﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺿﺒﻄﻪ ﻭﻣﻼﺯﻣﺘﻪ ﻟﻪ ﲟﻌﲎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ
ﺴﺎ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﳑﻦ ﺭﺀﺍﻩ ﻣﺮﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺣﻀﺮ ﻟﻪ ﳎﻠ
ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﺞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﲰﻌﻪ ﻳﻠﱯ ﻛﻤﺎ ﰲ
ﻒ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺷﻴﺒﺔ ،ﻭﺳﺄﻟﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﺒﻴﺔ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻣﺼﻨ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺮ.
ﻭﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻭﺛﻘﻪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒﺎ ﹶﻥ ﰲ ﺛﻘﺎﺗـﻪ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ:
)ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﻴﺶ( ﺍﻟﻨﺨﻌﻲ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ،ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ
- 74 -
ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﳍﻤﺪﺍﱐ ﻭﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻛﻬﻴﻞ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺴ ﹴﺦ ﻻ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﻫـﺬﺍ
ﻒ ﻧ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﺮﺍﻩ ﲢﺮﻳ
ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻟﻺﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ) :ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑـﻦ
ﺣﺒﻴﺶ( ﺍﻟﻨﺨﻌﻲ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﳍﻤﺪﺍﱐ ﻭﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﻦ
ﻛﻬﻴﻞ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺍ ﻥ :ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﻢ ﺑ ﻦﻭﻗﺎ ﹶﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﻣﺴﻠ ﻢ ﰲ ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺮﺩﺍ
ﻕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌ ﻲ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳـ ﺔ ﺣﺒﻴﺶ .ﺫ ﹶﻛ ﺮﻩ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺩ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﻕ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻛﻤـﺎ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻏﲑ ﺻﺤﻴ ﹴﺢ ﰲ ﺗﻔ ﺮ ﺩ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﻋﻠﻤﺖ.
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴﻒ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺥ ﻛﻤﺎ
ﻳﻈﻬﺮ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﻴﺶ ﻭﻻ ﻟﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺃﺑﺪﺍ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠـﻢ
ﺐ ﻷﻥﰲ ﺃﻱ ﺯﻣﻦ ﺣﺼﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘـﺼﺤﻴﻒ ﻟﻜﻨـﻪ ﻋﺠﻴـ
ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﻋﻼ َﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻐﻠﻄﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺳﻨﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﻪ:
ﲔ-ﰲ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻧﻌﻴﻢ – ﺃﻱ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻔﻀ ﹸﻞ ﺑ ﻦ ﺩﻛـ ﹴ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ )ﺑﺴﻨﺪ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ( ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺍﻟـﺒﺴﱵ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺹ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
- 75 -
ﱄ ﻭﺃﺣﺴ ﻦ ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ
ﺐ ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ ﺇ ﹼ
ﻚ ﺃﺣ
ﻋﻤﺮ ﻣﻮﻗﻮﻓﺎ :ﺍﻟﻠﻬﻢ ﺍﺟ ﻌ ﹾﻠ
ﻋﻨﺪﻱ.
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻭﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨﻒ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﻭﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺷﻴﺒﺔ ﻋﻦ
ﺾ
ﺐ ﰲ ﺑﻌ ﹺﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣﺮ ،ﻭﻣﺎ ﹸﻛﺘ
ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺦﹺ ﻣﻦ ﺷﺮﺡ ﻣﻐﻠﻄﺎﻱ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣﺎﺟ ﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺣﺒـﻴﺶ
ﺖ
ﺡ ﳐﻄﻮﻃﹰـﺎ ﻭﺭﺃﻳـ ﺖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﹺ
ﻓﻐﲑ ﺻﺤﻴ ﹴﺢ ﻷﱐ ﺍﻃﹼﻠﻌ
ﻂ )ﺣﯩﺲ( ،ﻓﺼﺤﻔﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻗﻞﹸ،
ﻛﻠﻤ ﹶﺔ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺑ ﹰﺔ ﺑﻐ ﹺﲑ ﻧﻘ
ﺏ ﺻﻮﺭ ﹰﺓ ﻋﻨـﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺀﺍﻓـ ﹸﺔ
ﷲ ﰲ ﺀﺍﺧ ﹺﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎ ﹺ
ﻭﺳﺘﺮﻯ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍ ِ
ﺐ ﻧﺴﺎﺧﻬﺎ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ.
ﺍﻟﻜﺘ ﹺ
ﻭﻭﺟﺪﺕ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﺍﻟﻴﻤﺎﱐ – ﻭﻫﻮ ﻋﻈﻴ ﻢ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻋﻨﺪ
ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ -ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻛﺬﺍ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺻﻠﲔ ﻭﺍﻟﺜﻘـﺎﺕ ﻭﺍﻟـﺬﻱ ﰲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎﰎ )ﺣﻨﺶ( ﻭﰲ ﻟﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ) :ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ
ﻕ
ﺣﺴﻦ( ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﻳﺔ ﱂ ﻳﺮ ﹺﻭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻏﲑ ﺃﰊ ﺍﺳﺤﺎ
ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻴﻌ ّﹺﻲ .ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍﺏ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ )ﺣﻨﺶ( ﻻﻧﻪ ﺫﻛـﺮﻩ ﺑﻌـﺪ
)ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﲪﺎﺩ( ﻭﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﻳﺔ )ﺣﻨﺶ( ﻓﻬﻮ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺟﺢ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺖ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﻟﺴﺎ ﹸﻥ ﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍ ﻥ ﻓﻔﻲ ﻧﺴﺨ ﺔ ﻫﻜﺬﺍ ،ﻭﰲ ﻧﺴﺨﺔ
ﻗﻠ
- 76 -
ﻒ "ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ" ﳍﺬﺍ ﺣﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﻟﻴﻤـﺎﱐ
ﺟﻴﺪﺓ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﲢﺮﻳ
ﺕ ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻠﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺧﻄﺄ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺥ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺀ ﺑﺎﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ
ﺇﺛﺒﺎ
ﺣﺴﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﲪﺎﺩ ،ﻭﺣﺮﻑ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻥ )ﺣﻨـ( ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﳌﻴﻢ
)ﲪـ( ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﻒ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻮﻫ ﻢ ﻣـﻦ
ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﰲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﲰـﻪ ﻗـﺎﻝ:
ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺃﺗﻰ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﺀ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺮﺍﺭ ﲟﻬﻤـﻼﺕ
ﺑﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺍﳋﺼﺎﺋﺺ ،ﻭﰲ ﺃﻣﺎﱄ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺩ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ
ﻋﺮﺍﺭ ﺃﻭ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻑﱯ ﺍﻟﻌﺼﺮ" ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺮ ﺐ ﺃﻢ ﻳﺼﻔﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ "ﺫﻫ ﻭﻋﺠﻴ
ﺴ ﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ "ﺍﳌﻨﻔﺮﺩﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺣﺪﺍﻥ" ﻟﻺﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﻣﺴﻠﻢﹴ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﺤـ ِ
ﲔ ﺯﻳـﺎﺩﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﻈ ﺮ ﰲ ﻓﺘﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻫﻮ ﰲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎ ﻭ ﹺﻝ ﺍﳌﺒﺘﺪﺋ
ﻕ ﱂ ﻳﻨﻔﺮ ﺩ ﻑ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺇﺳﺤﺎ ﲔ ﺍﳌﺘﻤ ﹺﺮّﺳﲔ ،ﻭﻻ ﻳﻌﺮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﻨﺘﻬ
ﻑ ﻓﺎﳌﺼﻴﺒ ﹸﺔ ﺃﻛ ﱪ ،ﻭﻋﺠﺒﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ،ﻭﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻌﺮ
ﺴﻌﻪ ﺤ ﺮ ﰲ "ﺍﻟﺘﻨﻜﻴﻞ" ،ﻭﻫﻮ ﻧﺎﻗ ﹲﻞ ﻭﻻ ﻳ ﻟﻪ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳ ﺪﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺒ
ﻼ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺕ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎﻥ ﺇﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻨﻘ ﹸﻞ ﻛﻼﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻃ ﹰ ﺍﻟﺴﻜﻮ
ﺚ ﻗﻄﺮﺓ.ﺃﻭ ﹸﻝ ﺗﻨﻜﻴ ﹴﻞ ﻟﻪ ﻭﷲ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﺷﺌﻮ ﹲﻥ ﻭﺃﻭ ﹸﻝ ﺍﻟﻐﻴ
- 77 -
ﻆ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎﺩ ﻓﺎﺋﺪ ﹲﺓ ﻭﻫﻲ ﻭﰲ ﺇﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﺖ
ﺕ ﲰﺎﻋﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﺇﻗﺮﺍ ﺭ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻷﻧﻪ ﺳـﻜ ﺇﺛﺒﺎ
ﻋﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﳑﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﻃﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﻓﻼ ﺗﻨـﺰﻝ ﻋﻨـﺪﻩ
ﻋﻦ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﺒﻮﺕ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻖ ﺀﺍﺧﺮ ﻳﺴﺘﻔﺎﺩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ،
ﻭﻟﻌﻠﹼﻨﺎ ﻟﻮ ﺍﻃﹼﻠﻌﻨﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻱ ﻷَﺛﺒﺘﻨﺎ ﺭﺍﻭﻳﺎ ﺀﺍﺧﺮ ﻋـﻦ
ﻀﻌﻒ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﹶﺔ.
ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛﻼ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﺎ ﺩ ﻏ ﲑ ﻣﺴﱠﻠ ﹴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﹶﻟ
ﻭﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ ﻧﻘﻠﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳋﻄﻴـﺐ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺎﻳـﺔ،
ﺐ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ) :ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ( ،ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠـﺮ
ﻭﺍﳋﻄﻴ
ﻗﻄﻌﺎ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋ ﹸﻞ:
ﻆ ﻣﻐﻠﻄﺎﻱ ﺑﺈﺳﻨﺎ ﺩ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺗـﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﻹﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ.
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻖ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ
ﻭﻣﻨﻬﺎ :ﺗﺼﺪﻳ ﻖ ﻟﻘﻮﱄ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﻠﺘﻪ ﺗﻔﻘﱡﻬﺎ ﺗﺒﻌﺎ ﻟﻠﻘﻮﺍﻋـﺪ
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺜﻴﺔ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳎﺎﻝ ﻟﻠﺘﺪﻟﻴﺲ ﻫﻨﺎ ،ﻷﻧﻪ ﻻ ﺭﺍﻭﻱ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺃﺑﻮ
- 78 -
ﻕ ﻭﺳﻠﻤ ﹸﺔ ﺑ ﻦ ﹸﻛﻬﻴ ﹴﻞ ﻭﻻ ﺳﺒﻴﻞ ﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻗﺴﺎﱐ ﻋﻦ
ﺇﺳﺤﺎ
ﺍﺑﻦ ﻛﻬﻴﻞ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﱡﻪ ﻟﻦ ﲡﺪﻩ ﳎﻤﻮﻋﺎ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻈﺎﹺﻧّـﻪ
ﷲ ﺗﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﲨﻌﻬﺎ ﻫﻨﺎ ﲝﻤ ﺪ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳـﺰ ﹾﻝ ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺴﺮ ﺍ ِ
ﺃﻫ ﹸﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨ ﺔ ﺃﺷﺎﻋﺮ ﹰﺓ ﻭﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳ ﺪﻳ ﹰﺔ ﻧﺎﺻﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮ ﹺﻡ ﻭﻣﺤ ﹺﺮّﺭﻳﻬـﺎ
ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻭﻫﻞ ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﰐ ﺃﻣ ﺮ ﺍ ِ
ﷲ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺄ ﹶ ﻃﺎﺋﻔ ﹰﺔ ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﹰﺓ ﺑﺈﺫ ﻥ ﺍ ِ
ﱐ ﺍﳌﺘﻌـ ﺪّﻱ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﺎ ﻥ ﻳﻌﺘ ﻤ ﺪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛـﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻷﻟﺒـﺎ ّﹺ
ﺚ ﺭﺍﻛﺒﺎ ﻣ ﻄﻴ ﹶﺔ ﺟﻬﻠﻪ .
ﺍﻷﺣﺎﺩﻳ
- 80 -
ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺳﺔ :ﻃﺒﻘﺔ ﻋﺎﺻﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺴﺔ – ﻭﻫﻢ ﺻﻐﺎﺭ
ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ -ﻟﻜﻦ ﱂ ﻳﺜﺒﺖ ﳍﻢ ﻟﻘﺎﺀ ﺃﺣﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟـﺼﺤﺎﺑﺔ
ﻛﺎﺑﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺞ.
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺼﲑﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﰲ ﺻﺪﻭﻕ
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺩﺳﺔ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻕ ﻫﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎ ﹺﺭ ﺣﺎ ﹺﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺗﻌﲏ
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﺻﺪﻭ
ﺺ ﺃﻣﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ: ﺃﻧﻪ ﺛﻘﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻳﺘﻠﺨ
ﺍﻷﻭﻝ :ﻣﺎ ﻣ ﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺪ ﹺﻡ ﺫﻛ ﹺﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘ ﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟـﺼﺤﺎﺑ ﺔ ﺇﻻ
ﻱ :ﻳﺸﺒ ﻪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹶﻥ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺮﺍﺳﻴﻞ )ﻭﺟﻌـﻞ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻨﻌﻨﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳌ ﺰ
ﻆ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ
ﺭﻣﺰﻩ "ﻣﺪ" ﺃﻱ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻴﻞ ﺃﰊ ﺩﺍﻭﺩ( ﻭﺃﻗﺮﻩ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ ﹸ
ﰲ ﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ.
ﻂ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻨﺴ ﹺﺦ ﺃﻭ ﻫﻮ
ﺤﻔﹶﺖ ﺃﻭ ﺣﺼ ﹶﻞ ﺳﻘ ﹲ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﱐ :ﺃﺎ
ﺻ ّ
ﲔ
ﺶ ﻭﺑـ ﺶ ﻭﺣﺒﻴ ﹴ
ﺶ ﻭﺣﻨﻴ ﹴ ﻭﻫ ﻢ ﺣﺎﺻ ﹲﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻤ ﹺﻊ ﺑﲔ ﺣﻨ ﹴ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﻋﺎﺩ ﹰﺓ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺒﻴﺐﹴ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ
ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻳﻜﺘﺒﻮﻥ ﺑﻄﺮﻳﻘ ﺔ ﻳﺴ ﻬ ﹸﻞ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺘـﺼﺤﻴﻒ،
ﻂ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫـﻮ ﺍﳊـﺎ ﹸﻝ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺰﻣﻦ ﺍﻷﻭﻝ ﺗﻨﻘﻴ ﹲ
- 81 -
ﻼ
ﻑ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻵ ﹶﻥ ،ﻓﺘﻘﺮﺃ ﻣـﺜ ﹰ
ﺍﻵ ﹶﻥ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﺷﻜ ﹸﻞ ﺍﳊﺮﻭ
ﰲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺧ ﻄّﻬﻢ) :ﺍﺳـﯩﺮ ﻭﺳﻼﺭ( ﺑﻐﲑ
ﻧﻘﻂ ،ﻭﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺃﺎ )ﺍﺳـﺮ ﻭﺳﻼﺭ( ﺃﻭ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺮﺳـ ﻢ ﻻ
ﻣﻌﲎ ﻟﻪ ﻻ ﰲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﻄﻬﺎﺭ ﺓ ﻭﻻ ﰲ ﻏﲑﹺﻩ ،ﻭﺑﻌـﺪ ﺍﻟﻨﻈـﺮ
ﻭﺍﳌﻘﺎﺭﻧﺔ ﻇﻬﺮ ﺃﺎ )ﺍﺛﻨﺘﲔ ﻭﺛﻼﺙ( ،ﻭﻋﻠـﻰ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﻓﻘـﺲ
ﻂ ﻭﻻ ﺃﻟﻒ( ﻛﻤﺎ ﺗﻜﺘﺐ " ﺳ ﹾﻔﻴﻦ ﻭﺭﲪٰـﻦ"
)ﺳﻔﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻧﻘ
ﺗﻈﻬﺮ ﻟﻚ )ﲰﯩـﺮ ﺃﻭ ﺳﻔﯩــﺮ( ﻭﻋﻠـﻰ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﻓﻜﻠﻤـﺔ
ﻂ ﻣﺜﻠﻬﺎ ،ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﻜﺘﺒﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺀ )ﺣﯩـﺲ ﻭﺣﺒﻴﺐ( ﺑﻐ ﹺ
ﲑ ﻧﻘ
ﻛﺎﻟﺮﺍﺀ )ﺣﺒﯩﲑ( ﻭﺗﺼﺤﻴ ﹸﻔﻬﺎ )ﺣﺒﻴﺲ( ﻭﻫﻲ ﺣﺒﻴﺶ ﺑﻐﲑ
ﻧﻘﻂ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ،ﻓﺘﺸﺎﺑﻬﻬﻤﺎ ﺷـﺪﻳ ﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘـﺼﺤﻴﻒ
ﻓﻴﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﻏﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻬﻮﻟﺔ ،ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﻫﺬﺍ ﳌﺎ ﺻﺤﻔﱡﻮﺍ )ﺣﻨﺶ ﺇﱃ
ﺣﺒﻴﺶ(.
ﻒ ﺑﺄﺷ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻭﻗﺼ ﹸﺔ
ﺐ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﻗﻊ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴ ﻭﻻ ﻋﺠ
ﻒ ﻣـﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﹲﺓ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺻﺎﱀ "ﺟﺰﺭﺓ" ﻣﻦ ﺃﺋﻤ ﺔ ﺍﻟـﺴﻠ
ﺤﻔﹶﻬﺎ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺳﺒﺒﻬﺎ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺮﹶﺃ "ﺧ ﺮ ﺯﺓ" ﻓـﺼ
ﻑ ﺑﻪ )ﺻﺎﱀ ﺟـﺰﺭﺓ( ،ﻭﻛـﺬﺍ "ﺟ ﺰﺭﺓ" ﻭﺻﺎﺭ ﻟﻘﺒﺎ ﻟﻪ ﻳﻌﺮ
- 82 -
ﱄ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﻣﻦ ﺻﺎﻡ ﺭﻣﻀﺎ ﹶﻥﻆ ﺃﰊ ﺑﻜ ﹴﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻮ ّﹺ
ﻒ ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﺗﺼﺤﻴ
ﻭﺃﺗﺒﻌﻪ ﺷﻴﺌﹰﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻮﺍﻝ( ﺇﳕﺎ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ )ﻭﺃﺗﺒﻌـﻪ ﺳـﺘﺎ ﻣـﻦ
ﺷﻮﺍﻝ(.
ﺐ ﺗﺼﺤﻴﻒ ﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺃﻥ ﺃﺣﺪﻫﻢ ﺃﺭﺍﺩ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻜﺘ ﻭﺃﻋﺠ
ﺐ ﻓﻘـﺎﻝ
ﻒ "ﹸﺃﺑ ﻲ" ﺃﻱ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻛﻌ ﹴ
ﺤ
ﻆ ﹸﻏﻨﺪﺭ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺻ
ﺍﳊﺎﻓ
ﺤﻔﹶﻪ ﻏﻨـﺰﺓ ،ﻓﺴﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﻟـﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻤـﺎ ﹸﻝ "ﹶﺃﺑﹺﻲ" ،ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﺻ
ﺗﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﻭﺗﻌﺎﱃ.
ﺚ ﺑﻌﻴﹺﻨﻪ ﺃﻭﺿـ ﺢ
ﻒ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ
ﻭﻣﺎ ﳓ ﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺼﺤﻴ
ﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤـ ﺮ ﺭﺿـﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨـﻬﻤﺎ:ﺑﻴﺎ ﻥ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ،ﻓﺎﳌﺮﻭ
)ﻭﺃﺧﺸﻰ ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ( ﻭﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟـﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﰲ ﻣـﺼﻨﻔﻪ:
ﺕ ﺇﱃ ﺭﺳﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﻠﻤـﺘﲔ )ﻭﺃﺣﺴ ﻦ ﺷﻰ ٍﺀ ﻋﻨﺪﻱ( ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺖ ﺍﻟﺘﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺑﲔ ﺃﺧﺸﻰ ﻭﺃﺣﺴﻦ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺘﺒﻨﺎﳘﺎ ﺑﻐﲑ ﻧﻘـﻂ ﺭﺃﻳ
ﻫﻜﺬﺍ) :ﺃﺣﺴﻰ ﻭ ﺃﺣـﺴﻦ( ﻟﻌﺮﻓﺖ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎ ﻣﺪﻯ ﺳﻬﻮﻟ ﺔ
ﺍﻷﻣﺮ.
ﺍﳍﻴـﺜﻢ،
ِ ﺚ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺷﻴﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﹶ
ﺖ
ﺶ ﻻ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﺭﺃﻳ
ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ﺃﻱ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﻨ ﹴ
- 83 -
ﺐ ﺍﻟـﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﺙ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﺎ ﹺﺭ ﺍﳍﻨﺪﻳ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﻴ ﹺﺦ ﺣﺒﻴ ﹺ
ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﺼﺮﻳ ﺢ ﳏ ّﺪ
ﻕ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ :ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﻒ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍ ﹺﺍﻷﻋﻈﻤ ّﹺﻲ ﰲ ﲢﻘﻴﻘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺼﻨ
ﺏ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﻢ ﺑ ﻦ
ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺷﻴﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺧﻄﹲﺄ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍ
ﺶ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ. ﺣﻨ ﹴ
ﺗﻨﺒﻴ ﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ:ﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﺍ ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﹶﺔ ﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻟﺴﺒ ﹴ
ﺐ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ
ﺍﻷﺳﺒﺎﺏ ﺍﻟﱵ ﻗﺎﳍﺎ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﹼﺎﻥ:
ﺙ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺏ ﺭﻭﺍ ﺓ ﺍﶈـ ّﺪ
ﺠ ﹺﺮ ﻋﺎﺩ ﹸﺓ ﺍﶈ ﺪّﺛﲔ ﺑﺎﺳـﺘﻴﻌﺎ ﹺ
ﱂ ﺗ
ﺫﻛﺮﻭﻩ ،ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺇﻣﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﻬﺮ ﺑﺎﻷﺧﺬ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻭ
ﺴﺮﺍ
ﻣﻦ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺗﻔﺨﻴﻢ ﻟﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﺘﻴـ ِّ
ﻣ ﻤ ﻜﻨﺎ ،ﻓﻠﻴﺲ ﻳﻨﺒﻐﻲ ﳌﻦ ﻧﻈﺮ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺐ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺃﻯ ﻣـﺜﻼ
ﺃﺑﺎ ﻛﺒﺸﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﻠﻮﱄ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻄﻴﺔ ،ﺃﻥ ﻳﻈﻦ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﱂ ﻳﺮ ﹺﻭ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻏﲑﻩ ،ﺑﻞ ﻗﺪ ﻳﻮﺟﺪ ﻣﻤﻦ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻨـﻪ ﲨﺎﻋـ ﹲﺔ
ﺳﻮﻯ ﻣﻦ ﹸﺫﻛﺮ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌﺘﺮﺽ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ.
ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻓﻠﻌﻠﹼﻪ ﻟﻨﺪﻭ ﹺﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻌﱠﻠ ﻪ ﻟﻈﹺﻨّﻬﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ
ﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﻴﺐ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻄﱠﻠﻊ ﺃﺣ ﺪ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ
ﻒ ﺇﱃ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﻗﻠـ ﹶﺔ ﺿ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ،ﻭﺃ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ،ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻜﻤﺎ ﹶﻝ ِ
ﻉ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﺎ ﹺﻝ ﻛﺜ ﹴﲑ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺮﻭﺍ ﺓ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺳ ﻌ ﺔ ﺍ ﻃّﻼﻋﻬـﻢ ﺍﻻ ﻃّﻼ ﹺ
- 84 -
ﺶ ﻓﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺍﷲ
ﻕ ﻣﺜﺎ ﹴﻝ ﻫﻮ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨ ﹴ
ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ،ﻭﺃﺻﺪ
ﺐ ﻋﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﻪ. ﺐ ﻏﺮﻳ ﺴ ﺮ ﲨ ﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻋﺠﻴ
ﻳ
ﺚ
ﺖ ﻟﻴ ﹶ
ﻭﻣﺜﺎ ﹸﻝ ﻣﺎ ﳓ ﻦ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﺃﺣ ﺪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻋﻠﻤ
ﻱ ﻏـ ﲑ ﺃﰊ ﺃﲪـ ﺪ ﺑ ﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺳﻠﻴ ﹴﻢ ﺭﺍﻭﻳﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺮ ّﹺ
ﺍﳊﺎﻛﻢ.
ﻭﻳﺆّﹺﻳﺪﻩ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﻪ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﻭﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺃﰊ ﺷﻴﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻋﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ
ﻣﺼ ﺮﺣﺎ ﺑﺎﲰﻪ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﻢ.
ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ :ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻘﺪﻳ ﹺﺮ ﻛﻮ ﻥ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﹺﻢ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺒﻴ ﹴ
ﺐ ﲰ ﻊ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻋﻤ ﺮ
ﺶ ﺛﻘ ﹰﺔ ﻭﻳﻘ ﹺﻮّﻱ
ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻓﺬﻟﻚ ﻳﺰﻳ ﺪ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﻢ ﺑ ﻦ ﺣﻨ ﹴ
ﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻟﺪﻻﻟﺘﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻤﺎ ﹺﻝ ﺿﺒﻄﻪ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳛﺘـﺎ
ﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺕ ﲰﺎ ﻋ ﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤ ﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ،ﻓﻴﺤﺘـﺎ ﺇﺛﺒﺎ
ﺼّﻬﻢ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻋﻨﻌ ﻦ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑ ﺔ ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺗﻪ ﻑﻧ ﺺ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼ ﻧ ّﹴ
ﻱ ﻭﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻴﻞ. ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺍﳌ ﺰ ّﹺ
ﺖ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻘﻴﻴﺪ ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻀﺎﺡ ﻟﻠﻌﺮﺍﻗﻲ ﺃﻥ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﻢ ﺑ ﻦ
ﻭﺭﺃﻳ
ﺣﻨﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺳﻠﻤﺔ ﺑﻦ ﹸﻛﻬﻴ ﹴﻞ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎﰎ،
- 85 -
ﻣﻊ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣـﻨﺶ ﺭﺩﺍ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﺼّﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﰲ ﺷﺮﺣﻪ ﺍﳋﻄﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺒﻐﺪﺍﺩﻱ ،ﻣﻊ ﻧ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻟﻔﻴﺘﻪ ،ﻓﺴﺒﺤﺎﻥ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘـﺼﺤﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﻓﻬـﻲ
ﻋﺠﻴﺒ ﹲﺔ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺸﺨﺺ ،ﻭﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﷲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳﺮﺍﺕ،
ﺐ ﻧﺴﺎﺧﻬﺎ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﻴﻞ ﻗﺪﳝﺎ :ﺀﺍﻓ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘ ﹺ
ﺐ
ﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺒﻴﺤ ﺔ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﳌﺜﲑ ﺓ ﻟﻠﻌﺠ ﹺ
ﺾ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴﻔﺎ
ﻓﺎﺋﺪ ﹲﺓ ﰲ ﺑﻌ ﹺ
ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﻊ ﺗﻔﺼﻴ ﹴﻞ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ:
ﺕ ﺍﳌﻀﺤﻜ ﺔ ﺍﳌﺒﻜﻴ ﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳﺘﻪ ﰲ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺠﻴﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺼﺤﻴﻔﺎ
ﺕ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻮﻣ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻘﻮﻧﻴ ﺔ ﻋﻨﺪ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ:
ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﳐﻄﻮﻃﺎ
ﺚ ﻋﺪﻩ
ﻭﺫﻱ ﻣ ﻦ ﹾﺍﻗﺴﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ
ﻭﻛـ ﱡﻞ ﻭﺍﺣـ ﺪ ﺃﺗـﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺪﻩ
ﻓﺼﺤﻔﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳ ﺦ :ﻭﹶﻗ ﱠﻞ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﺍﱐ ﻭﺣﺪ ﹲﺓ.
ﻭﻻ ﺃﺩﺭﻱ ﻫﻞ ﻳﻌﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻜﺘﺒﻪ ﺃﻡ ﻣـﺎﺫﺍ ،ﻓﻘـﺪ
ﺐ ﰲ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻪ ﻫﻮ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﺖ ﰲ ﻛﻮﻧﹺﻪ ﻋﺮﺑﻴﺎ ﻭﺃ ﻭ ﹶﻝ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺘ
ﺷﻜﻜ
ﱳ ،ﺃﻭ ﳓﻦ ﱂ ﻧﺴﺘﻄﻊ ﺃﻥ ﻧﺪﺭ ﻙ ﻛﹸﻨ ﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺩﻩ ﻓﻤﺎ ﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﺳﻴﺜﲑ ﺍﳌ
ﻚ ﻭﳚﻌﻠﻚ ﺗﺘﺮﺩ ﺩ ﰲ ﺍﳊﻜ ﹺﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠﻤﺎﺀ ﺍﻟﻠﻐﺔ.ﻋﺠﺒ
- 86 -
ﻒ ﻗﻮ ﹶﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻘﻮﱐ:
ﺤ
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻ
ﺢ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﺼ ﹾﻞ
ﺃﻭﻟﹸﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴ
ﺇﺳﻨﺎ ﺩ ﻩ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺸﺬﹼﱠ ﺃﻭ ﻳﻌﻞﹼ
ﺴ ﹺﻞ
ﺸ ﺪﺍ ﻭﻳﻌ ِ
ﻓﺤﺪﺙ ﻭﻻ ﺣﺮﺝ ﻓﻘﺪ ﺟﻌﻠﻬﺎ :ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺩ ﹸﺓ ﻭﱂ ﻳ
ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺩ ﹸﺓ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭﺩ ﹸﺓ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﺮﺓﹸ ،ﻓﻜﺄﻧﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫـﺬﺍ ﺃﺭﺍ ﺩ ﺃﻥ
ﺚ ﻓﻠـﻢ ﺍﻟﺒﻌﲑ ﻧﺎ ﺩ ﹲﺓ ﻭﺻﺎﺣﺒﺎ ﻩ ﱂ ﻳﺸﺪﺍﻫﺎ ﻓﺸﺮﺩﺕ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟ ﹸ
ﻳﻌﺴِﻞ ﺃﻱ ﱂ ﻳﺴﺮﻉ ﰲ ﻃﻠﺒﹺﻬﺎ ﻭﻟﻌﻠﻪ ﺣﺰﻧﺎ ﻋﻠﻴﻬـﺎ ﱂ ﻳﻌـﺪ
ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺘﺼﺮﻑ.
ﻓﻼ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻭﻻ ﻗﻮﺓ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎﷲ ﺍﻟﻌﻠـ ّﹺﻲ ﺍﻟﻌﻈـﻴ ﹺﻢ ،ﻓﻬـﺬﻩ
ﺚ ﻭﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺟﺰﺀًﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴﺎ ﺓ ﺍﳊﻴـﻮﺍ ﻥ ﺍﳌﻨﻈﻮﻣ ﹸﺔ ﰲ ﻋﻠ ﹺﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ
ﻱ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﹼﻢ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺎﺑ ﹶﺔ ﻋﻠﻰﺍﻟﻜﱪﻯ ﻟﻠ ﺪﻣﲑ
ﺐ
ﻳ ﺪ ﺃﺣ ﺪ ﺭﻋﺎ ﺓ ﺍﻹﺑﻞ ،ﻭﺳﻴﺄﰐ ﰲ ﺀﺍﺧﺮ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻔﺎﺋﺪ ﺓ ﺳـﺒ
ﺷﺮﺣﻲ ﳍﺎ ﻭﲣﺮﳚﹺﻬﺎ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ.
ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﻗﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻘﻮﱐ:
ﻣﺘﺮﻭﻛﹸﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺍﺣ ﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺩ
ﻭﺃﲨﻌﻮﺍ ﻟﻀﻌ ﻔ ﻪ ﻓ ﻬﻮ ﻛ ﺮﺩْ
- 87 -
ﺠﻤﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻔ ﹸﺔ
ﺤﻓﺼﺤﻔﻪ ﻗﺎﺋﻼ :ﻭﹶﻟ
ﺚ( ،ﻭﻟﻮ ﺩﺭﻯ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﻐ ﺔ )ﺃﻛﹶﻠﻮﱐ ﺍﻟﱪﺍﻏﻴ ﹸ
ﻒ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻟﺘﹶﻠﺤﺠﻢ ﳋﺠ ﹶﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺴِﻪ ،ﻓـﺈ ﹼﻥ ﺃﺻـﻠﹶﻬﺎ ﺤ ﺍﳌﺼ ّ
ﻉ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﻰ ِﺀ ،ﻓﻬﻞ
ﺖ ﺍﳍﺎ ُﺀ ﺣﺎﺀً ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻠﻬﺠﻢ ﺍﻟﻮﻟﻮ ﺍﻟﺘﻠﻬﺠﻢ ﹸﻗﻠﺒ
ﺃﺭﺍ ﺩ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻔﺎ َﺀ ﺃﹸﻭﻟﻌﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﻭﺍﻳ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﺃﻡ ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ
ﺝ ﺇﱃ ﺗﺮﲨﺎﻥ. ﻣﺎﺫﺍ ﻳﺮﻳ ﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﺈﻥ ﺗﺮﲨﺎﻧﻪ ﳛﺘﺎ
ﰒ ﺧﺘﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﻴﻘﻮﱐ:
ﻭﻗﺪ ﺃﺗﺖ ﻛﺎﳉﻮﻫ ﹺﺮ ﺍﳌﻜﻨﻮ ﻥ
ﲰﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﻣ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻴ ﹸﻘﻮﱐ
ﺖ ﻛﻤﺎ ﳉﻮﻫ ﹺﺮ ﺍﻟﻜﹸﻨﻮﻥ.
ﻓﺼﺤﻔﻬﺎ :ﻭﻗ ﺪﺍ ﺗ
ﺸ ﻖ ﰲ ﺍﻟـﺼﺨﺮ ﺓ، ﺖ ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﺍﻟ
ﻭﺍﻟﻘ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺸ ﻖ ﹸﻃﻮﻻﹰ ،ﻭﺍﻟﺘ
ﺕ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺟﻌﻠﲏ ﺃﻧﻈ ﺮ ﺐ ﺍﳌﺼﺎﺩﻓﺎ ﷲ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺠﻴ ﹺ ﻭﺇ ﱠﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﺍ ِ
ﻭﺃﺗﻌﺠﺐ ،ﻓﻬﻞ ﻫﻮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺟ ﺔ ﻣﻦ ﺍﳉﻬ ﹺﻞ ﺃﻡ ﻋﺎ ﹲﱂ ﰲ
ﺴ ﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠ ﹺﻢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺷﻴﺌﺎ ،ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺣـﺎ ﹴﻝ ﺍﻟﻠﻐ ﺔ ﻻ ﻳﺤ ِ
ﻓﻬﻮ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺇﻣﺎﻡ ﻋﺎ ﹲﱂ ﳎﻨﻮﻥ ﺃﻭ ﺟﺎﻫ ﹲﻞ ﻣﻐﺒﻮﻥ ،ﳓ ﻤ ﺪ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠـﻰ
ﻧﻌﻤ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ.
- 88 -
ﷲ ﺑﻜـﺜ ﹴﲑ ﻣـﻦ ﺖ ﻛ ﱠﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﻓﻼ ﺗﻐﺘ ﺮ ﺭﻋﺎ ﻙ ﺍ ُ ﻓﺈﺫﺍ ﺭﺃﻳ
ﱄﻅ ﻭﳏـﺎﻭﻻﺗﻬﻢ ﱠ ﺕ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ ﻭﺗﻼﻋﺒﺎﺗﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﻷﻟﻔـﺎ ﲢﺎﻳﻼ
ﺹ ﺣﱴ ﻻ ﻳﺴﻠّﻤﻮﺍ ﻟﻠﺨﺼﻢ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳏﻘـﺎ، ﻕ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ﹺ ﺃﻋﻨﺎ ﹺ
ﻼ ﲡ ﺪ ﺍﺑ ﻦ
ﻭﺳﻮﺍ ٌﺀ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺃﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻭﻉ ،ﻓﺈﻧﻚ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺗﻴﻤﻴ ﹶﺔ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺑﺄ ﹼﻥ "ﺃﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺇﻟﻴﻚ ﺑﻨﺒﹺﻴّﻚ" ﺃﻱ ﺑﺪﻋﺎ ِﺀ ﻧﺒﹺﻴّﻚ ،ﻫﺬﺍ
ﻉ ﻟﻠﺮﺟـﻞ ﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﱂ ﻳﺪ ﺍﶈﺘﺎ ﹸﻝ ﻳﻌﻠ ﻢ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺍﻟﻨ
ﷲ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺧﺒـﺚ ﺑﻞ ﻋﹼﻠﻤﻪ ﻛﻴﻒ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﻫﻮ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﺀً ،ﻗﺒﺢ ﺍ ُ
ﲢﺎﻳﻼﺗﻪ ﺍﳌﻜﺸﻮﻓ ﹶﺔ ،ﳛ ﹺﺮّﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺑﺪﻋﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴ ﹺﲑ ﻭﻳﺘﺮ ﻙ ﻗﻮﻝ
ﻋﺜﻤﺎ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﺭﻣ ّﹺﻲ ﺍﳌﺸّﹺﺒ ﻪ )ﻟﻮ ﺷﺎﺀ ﺍﷲ ﻻﺳﺘﻘ ﺮ ﻋﻠـﻰ ﻇﻬـ ﹺﺮ
ﺵ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ( ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﹺﻩ ﺑﻌﻮﺿ ﺔ ﻓﺎﺳﺘﻘﻠﹼﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻪ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻋﺮ ﹴ
ﺵ ﻭﻳﻨــﺰ ﹸﻝ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺪ ﱡﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﺰﻋ ﻢ ﺃﻥ ﻣﻌﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ﹺ
ﺇﱃ ﲰﺎ ِﺀ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺰﺍﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﺮﺵ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴﺎﺫ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻣـﻦ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻔ ﹺﺮ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻴ ﹺﻊ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺛﻨﻴ ﺔ ﺍﶈﻀ ﺔ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺪﺭﻱ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﺴ ﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ
ﻳﻌﺒﺪ "ﻣﻄﹼﺎﻃﹰﺎ" ﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺭﺓ ﺍﻟﺸﻨﻴﻌ ﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴﺎﺫ ﺑﺎﷲ ،ﻭﺍﻹﺳﻼ ﻡ
ﺟﺎ َﺀ ﶈﺎﺭﺑ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻨﻴﺔ ،ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺟﻌ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟﻮﺛﻨﻴ ﹶﺔ ﺇﺳﻼﻣﺎ ﳏﻀﺎ ،ﻗﺎﺗﻞ
ﻚ ﺑﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ ﺗﺮﻯ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﰊ ﺍﷲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﺘﺠﺴﻴ ﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﺛﻨﻴﺔﹶ ،ﻭﻟﻌﻠ
"ﺻﻴ ﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺳﻨﺢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺯﻭﺍ ﹺﻝ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﺡ" ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﺎﺷﻴ ﹲﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷـﺮﺡ
- 89 -
ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﲨﺎﻋ ﹶﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗﺼﻴﺪ ﺓ "ﻏﺮﺍﻣﻲ ﺻـﺤﻴﺢ" ﻛﻴـﻒ
ﺕ ﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋﺪ ﺓ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻤـﻲ
ﺖ ﺗﻮﺟﻴ ﻪ ﺇﺣﺪﻯ ﺍﻟﻌﺒﺎﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﻭﻟ
ﺑﺄﺻ ﹺﻞ ﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤ ﺔ ،ﻓﺮﺍﺟﻌﻪ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﻣﻔﻴـﺪ ﺑـﺈﺫﻥ ﺍﷲ،
ﺏ ﰲ ﺍﺳﻢ "ﺍﳍﻴـﺜﻢ ﺑـﻦ ﺲ ﲢﺮﻳ ﹺﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﻮﺍ ﹺ
ﻭﺍﻋﺮﻑ ﻗﺪ ﺭ ﻧﻔﻴ ﹺ
ﺣﻨﺶ" ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﻢ.
ﻭﻛﻤﺎ ﻇﻬﺮ ﻟﻚ ﻓﺎﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﺛﻘﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺃﻳـﺖ
ﺡ ﻭﻻ ﺗﻌﺪﻳ ﹲﻞ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋـﻦ ﻭﻟﻮ ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﺑﺄﻧﻪ ﱂ ﻳﺮﺩ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺟﺮ
ﺡ ﺣ ﺞ ﻣ ﻊ ﺳﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤ ﺮ ﺭﺿﻲ
ﺍﺛﻨﺎ ﻥ ﻭﻇﺎﻫ ﺮ ﺃﻣﺮﹺﻩ ﺍﻟﺼﻼ
ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺻﻠﻰ ﻣﻌﻪ ﻭﺃﺧﺬ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ ،ﻭﺭﻭﺍﻳﺎﺗﻪ ﺗﺸﻬﺪ
ﺑﺘﻤﺎﻡ ﺿﺒﻄﻪ ﻓﻤﺎﺫﺍ ﺑﻘﻲ ﳍﻢ ﻏ ﲑ ﺍﳌﻜﺎﺑﺮﺓ ،ﻭﺧـﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺃﻥ
ﻱ ﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﻭﱂ ﳚﺮﺣﻪ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﻘﻮﻳ ﹲﺔ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ
ﻟﻪ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎﰎ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ:
ﺑﺎﺏ ﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺔ ﻋﻦ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳌﻄﻌﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺃﺎ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﻪ
ﻭﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﻄﻌﻮﻥ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺎ ﻻ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﻪ
ﺕ
ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﺄﻟﺖ ﺍﰊ ﻋﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘـﺎ
ﻒ
ﻀﻌ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺟ ﹴﻞ ﻏ ﹺﲑ ﺛﻘ ﺔ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻳﻪ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻓﺎ ﺑﺎﻟ
ﱂ ﺗﻘ ّﹺﻮﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ،ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳎﻬﻮ ﹰﻻ ﻧ ﹶﻔ ﻌﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻳ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﺜﻘ ﺔ ﻋﻨﻪ.
- 90 -
ﺖ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺯ ﺭ ﻋ ﹶﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻳـ ﺔ
ﺣﺪﺛﻨﺎ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﲪٰ ﹺﻦ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺳﺄﻟ
ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺟ ﹴﻞ ﳑﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻱ ﺣﺪﻳﹶﺜﻪ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺇﻱ ﹶﻟ ﻌﻤﺮﻱ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺘﻮﺛﻴ ﹺﻖ ﻋﻨﻪ، ﻱ ﻓﻬﻨﺎﻙ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻗﻮ ﺖ :ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ﻗﻠ
ﻱ ﺍﻟﱵ ﺟﺰﻡ ـﺎ ﺃﻱ ﻓﺄﻫ ﹸﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ﹺﻢ ﻳﻌﺮﻓﻮ ﹶﻥ ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻴ ﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ّﹺ
ﺖ
ﺤ ﺃﺗﻰ ﺎ ﺑﺼﻴﻐﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻭ ﹶﺫﻛﹶﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻭ ﺣﻜﹶﻰ ﺻﺤﻴﺤ ﹲﺔ ﺻ
ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻮﻻ ﺫﻟﻚ ﳌﺎ ﺟﺰﻡ ﺎ ،ﻗﻠﺖ ﻭﻳﺪ ﱡﻝ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻗ ﻮ ﺓ ﺍﻟﻘـﻮ ﹺﻝ
ﺑﺘﻘﻮﻳ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻭﻱ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳﻜﺖ ﻋﻨﻪ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭ ﳜ ﻪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﳜـﻪ
ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﻊ ﺑ ﻦ ﻣﻨﺬﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻴﻪ( .ﻭﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺟﺮﺣـﺎ ،ﰒ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ) :ﻗﻮﹸﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ :ﻭ ﻣﻦ
ﺨ ﺮﺟﺎ( ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟ ﺮﺑﻴ ﻊ ﺑ ﻦ ﺧﹶﺜﻴﻢ :ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ
ﺠ ﻌ ﹾﻞ ﹶﻟ ﻪ ﻣ
ﷲ ﻳ
ﻳﺘ ﹺﻖ ﺍ َ
ﻣﺎ ﺿﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ.
ﺼ ﻐ ﺮ،
ﻗﻮﻟﻪ :ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﻊ ﺑﻦ ﺧﹶﺜﻴﻢ ﲟﻌﺠﻤﺔ ﻭﻣﺜﱠﻠﹶﺜﺔ ﻣـ
ﱐ ﻭﺍﺑـ ﻦ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ) :ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﺿﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ( ﻭﺻﻠﻪ ﺍﻟﻄﱪﺍ ﱡ
ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎ ﹴﰎ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳ ﹺﻖ ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴ ﹺﻊ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻣﻨﺬ ﹴﺭ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻴﻪ ﻋـﻦ
ﺠ ﻌ ﹾﻞ ﹶﻟ ﻪ
ﷲ ﻳ
ﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﻊ ﺑﻦ ﺧﺜﻴﻢ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﻗﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺘ ﹺﻖ ﺍ َ
ﺨ ﺮﺟﺎ( ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ،ﻗﺎﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻰﺀ ﺿﺎﻕ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ.
ﻣ
- 91 -
ﺐ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻣﺴﻌﻮﺩ ﺤ ﺻﻭﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﻊ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺎﺑﻌﲔ
ﷲ
ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻟﻪ – ﺃﻱ ﻟﻠﺮﺑﻴﻊ ﺑﻦ ﺧﺜﹶﻴﻢ -ﻟﻮ ﺭﺀﺍ ﻙ ﺭﺳﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍ ِ
ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ َﻷ ﺣﺒﻚ .ﺃﻭﺭﺩ ﺫﻟﻚ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﰲ ﺍﻟ ﺰﻫـ ﺪ
ﺝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺤﲔ ﻭﻏ ﹺﲑﳘﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺑﻴﻊ
ﺨ ﺮ
ﺑﺴﻨ ﺪ ﺟﻴ ﺪ ﻭﺣﺪﻳﺜﻪ ﻣ
ﺨ ﹺﺮﺟﻮﺍ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻟﻜﻦ ﹶﺫ ﹶﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺍﺑـ ﻦ ﺃﰊ
ﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﺬﺭ ﱂ ﻳ
ﺕ
ﺣﺎ ﹴﰎ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﺍ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺟﺮ ﺣﺎ ﻭ ﹶﺫ ﹶﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘـﺎ
ﻭﺃﺑﻮﻩ ﻣﺘﻔﻖ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻘﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺨﺮﻳﺞ ﻋﻨﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛـﻼ ﻡ ﺍﺑـﻦ
ﺣﺠﺮ.
- 92 -
ﻭﻻ ﻧﻈﻦ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﺃﻥ ﳚﺰﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺑﺼﺤﻴﺢ
ﻋﻤﻦ ﺟﺰﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻓﺼ ﺢ ﺫﺍﻙ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﻟﻜ ﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺷﺮ ﻃ ﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﺰ ﻣ ﻪ
ﺨ ﹺﺮﺟﻪ ﰲ ﺻﺤﻴﺤﻪ ،ﻓﺘﻤﺴﻚ ﺎ. ﺤ ﻪ ﲢﺪﻳﺪﺍ ،ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳ
ﰲ ﺻﺤﻴ
-ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻧﻴ ﹸﺔ :ﺗﻮﺛﻴ ﻖ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺠ ﹴﺮ ﻟﻠﺮﺑﻴـﻊ ﺑـﺴﻜﻮﺗ ﻪ ﻋـﻦ
ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﺇﻣﺎ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﻭﺇﻣﺎ ﺣﺴﻦ ،ﻛﻤﺎ
ﺍﻟﺘﺰﻡ ﺫﻟﻚ ﰲ ﻣﻘ ﺪّﻣ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﺘﺢ.
ﻱ ﺍﺣﺘ ﺞ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﺑﻴﻊ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﺬﺭ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﳜـﻪ -ﺍﻟﺜﺎﻟﺜ ﹸﺔ :ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ
ﺸ ﺮﻗﻲ :ﺣﺪﺛﲏ
ﺤﺎ ﻙ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺷ ﺮﺣﹺﺒﻴ ﹶﻞ ﺍ ﳌ
ﺍﻟﻜﺒﲑ ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺗﺮﲨﺔ ﺍﻟﻀ
ﻋﺒﻴﺪ ﻧﺎ ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻄﻴﺔ ﻋﻦ ﺭﺑﻴﻊ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻨﺬﺭ ﻋـﻦ ﺃﺑﻴـﻪ:
ﺭﺣﻠﺖ ﺃﻧﺎ ﻭﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺣﺬﻳﻔﺔ ﻭﺍﻟـﻀﺤﺎﻙ ﺑـﻦ ﺷـﺮﺣﺒﻴﻞ
ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻗﻲ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ ﳛﺘ ﺞ ﺑـﻪ ،ﻓﻬـﻮ
ﻓﺈﻥ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺿﻌﻴﻔﹰﺎ ﻋﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻸ ّﹺ
ﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ.
ﻳﺘﻜﻠ ﻢ ﰲ ﺩﺍﺋﺮ ﺓ ﺍﳉﺮ ﹺ
ﻚ ﺎ ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠﱡﻪ ﻳﺪﻟﱡﻚ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺴ ﺲ ﻓﺘﻤ
ﻓﻬﺬﻩ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻔﺎﺋ ﹺ
ﺶ ﺛﻘﺔ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺍﳌﻮّﻓ ﻖ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺎﻥ.
ﺃﻥ ﺍﳍﻴﺜ ﻢ ﺑ ﻦ ﺣﻨ ﹴ
- 93 -
ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﻣﺜﺎﹸﻟﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﺀ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ﺍﳌﺴﺪﺩ ﰲ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺳـ ّﺪ
ﺏ ﻋﻠ ّﹴﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻟـﺴﻼﻡ :ﺭﻭﺍﻩ ﺍﻟﻄـﱪﺍﱐ ﰲ
ﺏ ﺇﻻ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻷﺑﻮﺍ ﹺ
ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ ﻋﻦ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻭﻗﺎﺹ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺮﻭﻩ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳊﻜـﻢ ﺇﻻ
ﻣﻌﺎﻭﻳﺔ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻴﺴﺮﺓ ﺑﻦ ﺷﺮﻳﺢ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺣﻔﻴـﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺿـﻲ
ﺷﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﻟﻜﻨﺪﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭﻱ ﰲ ﺗﺎﺭﳜﻪ :ﲰﻊ ﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑـﻦ
ﻋﺘﻴﺒﺔ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺟﺮﺣﺎ ﻭﺫﻛﺮﻩ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺣﺒﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺜﻘﺎﺕ.
ﰒ ﺻﺤﺢ ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎ ﺩﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻔـﺘﺢ:
ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺳﻌﺪ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﻭﻗﺎﺹ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻣﺮﻧﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺑﺴﺪ ﺍﻷﺑﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭﻋﺔ ﰲ ﺍﳌﺴﺠﺪ ﻭﺗﺮﻙ ﺑـﺎﺏ
ﻋﻠﻲ .ﺃﺧﺮﺟﻪ ﺃﲪﺪ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺴﺎﺋﻲ ﻭﺇﺳﻨﺎﺩﻩ ﻗﻮﻱ.
ﻭﰲ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻟﻠﻄﱪﺍﱐ ﰲ ﺍﻷﻭﺳﻂ -ﺭﺟﺎﳍﺎ ﺛﻘـﺎﺕ -
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺩﺓ :ﻓﻘﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺳﻮﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺳـﺪﺩﺕ ﺃﺑﻮﺍﺑﻨـﺎ .....
ﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ .ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺣﺠﺮ
ﻱ ﻣﺘﺮﺩ ﺩ ﺑﲔ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴ ﹺﺢ
ﺖ :ﻗﻮﻟﹸﻪ )ﺑﺈﺳﻨﺎﺩ ﻗﻮﻱ( ،ﺍﻟﻘﻮ
ﻗﻠ
ﻭﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﺃﻗﺮﺏ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﰲ ﻋﻠـﻢ
ﻕ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﻠّﻪ ﺇﳕـﺎ ﺫﻛﺮﺗـﻪﺍﳊﺪﻳﺚ ﻭﺍﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﺛﻘﺔ ﻓﻮ
ﻟﻠﻔﺎﺋﺪﺓ.
- 94 -
ﻭﺍﳋﻼﺻﺔ ﺃﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﻗﺴﺎﱐ ﻻ ﺗﻨـﺰﻝ ﻋـﻦ ﺭﺗﺒـﺔ
ﺍﳊﺴﻦ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﻠﺖ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﻢ
ﻭﻫﻨﺎ ﻛﻼ ﻡ ﻣﻔﻴ ﺪ ﻓﻴﻤﺎ ﻳﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﳍﻴﺜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺣﻨﺶ ﻭﳏﻤﺪ
ﺑﻦ ﻣﺼﻌﺐ:
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﻄﺎﻥ ﰲ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻹﻳﻬـﺎﻡ ﺭﺩﺍ
ﺠﻴﺔ" ﻣﺎ ﻧﺼﻪ :ﻛـﺬﺍ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳊﺎﻓﻆ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳊﻖ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺫﻛﺮ " ﺣ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺣﺠﻴ ﹶﺔ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺑﻪ ،ﻭﻟﻴﺲ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻭﺇﳕﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺗﺒﻊ
ﻱ ﺳﺄﻟﻪ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺍﺑﻨﻪ ﻓﻘﺎﻝ" :ﻫﻮ ﺷﻴﺦ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺞ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺣﺎ ﹴﰎ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍ
ﻱ
ﺸ ﺮﻳ ﹺﺢ ﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎ ﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﺋﺪ ّﹺ
ﲝﺪﻳﺜﻪ ،ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺑﺎﻬﻮﻝ ،ﺷﺒﻴ ﻪ ﺑ
ﻭﻫﺒﲑﺓ ﺑﻦ ﻳ ﹺﺮﱘ"
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﰲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺷﺮﻳﺢ :ﺇﻥ ﺷﺮﻳﺢ ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﻨﻌﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻫﺒﲑﺓ ﺑﻦ
ﻳﺮﱘ ﺷﺒﻴﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻬﻮﻟﲔ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺞ ﲝﺪﻳﺜﻬﻤﺎ.
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻏﲑ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ،ﻭ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻠ ﻤﺖ ﺣﺎﻟﹸـﻪ ﰲ ﲪـ ﹺﻞ
ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ﹺﻢ ﻭﲢﺼﻴﻠﻪ ،ﻭﺃﺧﺬ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﻋﻨﻪ ﻭﻧ ﻘﹶﻠﺖ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺳﲑﺗﻪ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻟـ ﹸﺔ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﻼ ﺣﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻋّﹺﺒﺮ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺑﻠﻔﻆ ﻗﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻧﻘ ﹺﻞ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺎﺻﻴ ﹺﻞ ﻣـﻦ
ﺿﺎ ﻭﳓ ﹺﻮ ﺫﻟﻚ ،ﻻ ﻅ ﺍﳌﺼﻄﹶﻠ ﹺﺢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﺜﻘ ﺔ ﻭ ﹺﺭ ﺍﻷﻟﻔﺎ
- 95 -
ﻳﻘﺒﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻓﻴﻪ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﻻ ﳛﺘﺞ ﺑﻪ ﺃﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺃﺷﺒﻪ ﺫﻟـﻚ ﻣـﻦ
ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﺘﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻭﻻ ﺑﺪ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻀﻌ ﹶﻔﻪ ﲝﺠ ﺔ ﻭﻳﺬﻛ ﺮ ﺟﺮﺣـﺎ
ﺴﺮﺍ ﻭﺇﻻ ﱂ ﻳﺴﻤ ﻊ ﻣﻨﻪ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻻ ﻫﻮ ﻭﻻ ﻏ ﲑﻩ ﻛﺬﻟﻚ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻣﻔ
ﻗﺪ ﺟﺮﻯ ﺍﻵﻥ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ -ﺃﻋﲏ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺣﺎ ﹴﰎ -ﱂ ﻳـﺪﻝ ﰲ ﺃﻣـﺮ
ﻫﺆﻻﺀ ﺑﺸﻰ ٍﺀ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻢ ﻟﻴﺴﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﳌﺸﻬﻮﺭﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻟﺸﻬﺮ ﹸﺓ ﺇﺿﺎﻓﻴ ﹲﺔ ﻗﺪ
ﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺮﺟ ﹸﻞ ﻣﺸﻬﻮ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻨ ﺪ ﻗﻮ ﹴﻡ ﻭﻻ ﻳﺸﺘﻬﺮ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺀﺍﺧﺮﻳﻦ.
ﻒ ﻓـﻴﻤﻦ ﱂ ﻧﻌﻢ ﻟﻮ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻟﻨﺎ ﺫﻟﻚ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻟﻔﺎﻅ ﺍﻟﺘـﻀﻌﻴ
ﻳﻌﺮﻑ ﺣﺎﻟﹸﻪ ﲟﺸﺎﻫﺪﺓ ﺃﻭ ﺑﺈﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﳐﹺﺒﺮﹴ ،ﻛﻨﺎ ﻧﻘﺒﻠﻪ ﻣﻨﻪ ﻭﻧﺘﺮﻙ
ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻞ ﻛﻨﺎ ﻧﺘﺮﻙ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻪ ﻟﻠﺠﻬﻞ ﲝﺎﻟﻪ ﻟﻮ ﱂ ﻧـﺴﻤﻊ
ﺫﻟﻚ ﻓﻴﻪ.
ﻓﺤﺠﻴﺔ ﺍﳌﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﻻ ﻳﻠﺘﻔﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺇﱃ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﻗـﺎﻝ" :ﻻ
ﺕ ﲝﺠﺔ ﻓﺈﻧﻪ ﺭﺟﻞ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭ ﻗﺪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﳛﺘﺢ ﺑﻪ" ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﺄ
ﺳﻠﻤ ﹸﺔ ﺑ ﻦ ﹸﻛﻬﻴ ﹴﻞ ﻭﺃﺑﻮ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﳊﻜﻢ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺘﻴﺒﺔ ﺭ ﻭﻭﺍ ﻋﻨـﻪ
ﻋﺪﺓ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳﺚ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﱂ ﻳﻌﻬﺪ ﻣﻨـﻪ ﺧﻄـﺄ ﻭﻻ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﻭﻻ ﻧﻜﺎﺭﺓ.
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﰲ :ﺇﻧﻪ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﰲ ﺗﺎﺑﻌﻲ ﺛﻘـﺔ ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﻛﻨﺪﻱ.
- 96 -
ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﳚﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﰊ ﳏﻤﺪ -ﺑﺎﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﻠﺘ ﺰﻣﻪ ﻓﻴﻤﻦ
ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺇﺫﺍ ﱂ ﻳﺴﻤﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﲡﺮﳛﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳﻘﺒﻠﻪ،
ﻭﻟﻮ ﱂ ﳚﺪ ﺗﻮﺛﻴﻘﻪ.
ﻭﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺳ ﻤ ﻊ ﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺣﺎ ﹴﰎ ﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﲡﺮﳛﺎ ،ﺇﳕﺎ
ﻼ ﲝﺎﻟﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟ ﻢ ﺣﺠﺔ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻞ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﲝﺮﻭﻓﻪ
ﻛﺎﻥ ﺟﻬ ﹰ
ﱯ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺮ ّﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ،ﻭﺍﷲ
ﺽ ﻋﻠﻴ ﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻫ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻭﱂ ﻳﻌﺘﺮ
ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﻢ.
- 98 -
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺑﺎﳊﻔﻆ ﻭﺍﻹﺗﻘﺎﻥ ﻭﺻﺤﺔ ﺍﻟﻜﺘـﺎﺏ ﻣـﻊ
ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﻷﺋﻤﺔ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﰲ ﺍﳉﺮﺡ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﻤـﺎ ﰲ ﺍﳉـﺮﺡ
ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﻭﺍﳌﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻭﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺬﻳﺐ ﻭﻏﲑﻫﺎ.
ﻱ ﻋﻨﻪ:
ﻭﺍﻟﻘﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﺼ ﹸﻞ ﰲ ﻛﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋ ﺪ ّﹴ
ﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﻳﺦ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﺔ ﻭﻣـﻦ ﺍﳌﺨﺘـﺼﲔ
ﺨﻬﻢ )ﻣﺜ ﹺﻞ ﺃﰊ ﺇﺳﺤﺎﻕ ﺍﻟـﺴﺒﻴﻌﻲ(
ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳﺔ ﻋﻦ ﲨﻠﺔ ﻣﺸﺎﹺﻳ
ﻭﺃﰊ ﺣﺼﲔ ﻭﻋﺎﺻﻢ ﺑﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻟﻨﺠﻮﺩ ﻭﻫﻮ ﺻﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻣﻦ
ﻗﺮﺍﺀ ﺃﻫﻞ ﺍﻟﻜﻮﻓﺔ ﻻ ﺑﺄﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺫﺍﻙ ﺃﱐ ﱂ ﺃﺟﺪ ﻟﻪ ﺣـﺪﻳﹰﺜﺎ
ﻣﻨﻜ ﺮﺍ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺛﻘﺔ ﺇﻻ ﺃﻥ ﻳﺮﻭﻱ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺵ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﻨﻪ ﺛﻘـ ﹲﺔ ﻓﺎﻹﺳـﻨﺎ ﺩ
ﺖ :ﻭﺍﺑ ﻦ ﺧﺪﺍ ﹴ
ﻗﻠ
ﺻﺤﻴﺢ.
ﱯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺷﻌﺒ ﹶﺔ ﻣﻘ ﺪ ﻡﻭﺍﻷﻛﺜﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻃ
ﰲ ﺍﻷَﺩﺍ ِﺀ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺣﻔﺺﹴ ،ﻭﻗ ﺪ ﻡ ﺍﻵﺧﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺃﺑـﻮ
ﻉ ﺧﺎﲤـ ﹸﺔ ﱐ ﺣﻔﺼﺎ ﻛﻤﺎ ﺃﻓﺎ ﺩ ﻩ ﺳـّﹺﻴﺪﻧﺎ ﺍﻟـﻀﺒﺎ
ﻋﻤﺮﹴﻭ ﺍﻟﺪﺍ ﱡ
ﺕ ﺍﻟﺴﺒ ﹺﻊ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ﹺﻢ ﻭﻛﺬﺍ ﺃﺧﺬﺎ ﺿﻤ ﻦ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺍ
ﺐ ﺍﻟﻔﻀ ﹺﻞ ﳏﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﻦ ﻣﻨـﺼﻮﺭ ﰒ ﺍﻟﻌﺸ ﹺﺮ ﻋﻦ ﺳﹺﻴّﺪﻱ ﺻﺎﺣ ﹺ
- 99 -
ﻗﺮﻃﺎﻡ ﺟﺰﺍﻩ ﺍﷲ ﻭﺃﺧﺎﻩ ﺍﻟﺸﻴ ﺦ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻀ ﹺﻞ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﻋﲏ ﺧـﲑﺍ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﻀﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻠ ﻲ ﰲ ﺷﺘﻰ ﺍﻟﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﺵ
ﳊﻔﹼﺎﻅ :ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜ ﹴﺮ ﺑـ ﻦ ﻋﻴـﺎ ﹴ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ ﰲ ﺗﺬﻛﺮﺓ ﺍ ﹸ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻘﺪﻭﺓ ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﰒ ﺭﻭﻯ ﻣﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺃﰊ ﻋﻤﺮﻭ
ﺑﻦ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎﻙ ﻧﺎ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﻦ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﳉﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﺎ "ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺑﻦ ﻋﻴـﺎﺵ
ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﺳﺤﺎﻕ" ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺍﻷﺣﻮﺹ ﻋﻦ ﺃﺑﻴﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﺑـﺼﺮ
ﻋﻠ ﻲ ﺭﺳﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺀﺍﻟﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺛﻴﺎﺑﺎ ﺧﻠﹾﻘﺎﻧـﺎ،
ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻟﻚ ﻣﺎﻝﹲ؟ ﻗﻠﺖ :ﻧﻌﻢ ،ﻗﺎﻝ :ﺃﻧﻌﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﻔﺴﻚ ﻛﻤـﺎ
ﺕ ﺑـﻪ
ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻚ ،ﻗﻠﺖ ﺇﻥ ﺭﺟﻼ ﻣﺮ ﰊ ﻓﺄﹶﻗﺮﻳﺘﻪ ﻓﻤﺮﺭ ﺃﻧﻌﻢ ﺍ ُ
ﻓﻠﻢ ﻳ ﹾﻘﺮﹺﱐ ﹶﺃﹶﻓﹶﺄ ﹾﻗﺮﹺﻳﻪ؟ ﻗﺎﻝ :ﻧﻌﻢ .ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻛﻼﻡ
ﺍﻟﺬﻫﱯ.
ﻒ ﻗـ ﺮﻯ
ﺖ ﺍﻟﻀﻴ ﻗﻮﻟﹸﻪ :ﺃﻓﺄﹶﻗﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟ ﻘﺮﻯ ﺗﻘﻮ ﹸﻝ ﹶﻗﺮﻳ
ﺕ
ﺼ ﺮ
ﻑ ﻗﹶـ
ﺕ ﺍﻟﻘﺎ
ﺖ ﺇﹺﻟﻴﻪ ،ﻓﺈﹺﺫﺍ ﻛﺴﺮ ﻭﻗﹶﺮﺍ ًﺀ ﺃﺿﻔﺘﻪ ﻭﺃﹶﺣﺴﻨ
ﺕ "ﻗﹶﺮﺍﺀ" ﻭﻳﺤﻜﻰ "ﻗﺮﺍﺀ" ﺃﻳﻀﺎ ﻋﻦ ﺖ ﻣ ﺪ ﺩ
ﺤ
"ﻗﺮﻯ" ﻭﺇﹺﺫﺍ ﻓﺘ
ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﻜﺴﺎﺋ ّﹺﻲ ،ﻓ ﹶﻘﺮﻯ ﻳﻘﺮﻱ ﻣﺜ ﹸﻞ ﺭﻣﻰ ﻳﺮﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
ﻭﺭﻭﻯ ﻋﺒﺪ ﺍﻟﺮﺯﺍﻕ ﰲ ﻣﺼﻨ ﻔ ﻪ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺃﺧﱪﻧﺎ ﺍﻟﺜﻮﺭﻱ ﻋﻦ
ﻣﻨﺼﻮﺭ ﻋﻦ ﻫﻼﻝ ﺑﻦ ﻳﺴﺎﻑ ﻋﻦ ﺃﰊ ﺷﻌﺒﺔ ﺍﻟﺒﻜﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ:
ﺖ ﺍﺑ ﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﺎﻟﺒﻴﺖ ﻭﻫﻮ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻻ ﺇﻟﻪ ﺇﻻ ﺭﻣﻘ
ﺍﷲ ﻭﺣﺪﻩ ﻻ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﻟﻪ ،ﻟﻪ ﺍﳌﻠﻚ ﻭﻟﻪ ﺍﳊﻤﺪ ﺑﻴﺪﻩ ﺍﳋﲑ ﻭﻫﻮ
ﻋﻠﻰ ﻛﻞ ﺷﻰﺀٍ ﻗﺪﻳﺮ ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺭﺑﻨﺎ ﺀﺍﺗﻨﺎ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺪﻧﻴﺎ ﺣﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﰲ
ﺍﻵﺧﺮﺓ ﺣﺴﻨﺔ ﻭﻗﻨﺎ ﻋﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺭ.
ﺚ ﺍﳌﺴﻨ ﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻣﺸﻬﻮ ﺭ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﹺﻡ ﺃﲪ ﺪ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﻰ ﺃﺣﺎﺩﻳ ﹶ
ﻒ ﺣﺪﻳﺚ ،ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ ﲔ ﺃﻟ ﲔ ﺳﺒﻌﻤﺎﺋ ﺔ ﻭﲬﺴ
ﺑ ﹺ
ﺚ ﺍﻷﺳﺎﻧﻴﺪ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺘﻮ ﹸﻥ ﺍﳌﻘﺒﻮﻟ ﹸﺔ
ﻒ ﺃﻟﻒ ،ﺃﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻴ ﹸ ﳛﻔﻆ ﺃﻟ
ﻓﻨﺤ ﻮ ﲬﺴ ﺔ ﻭﻋﺸﺮﻳ ﻦ ﺃﻟﻔﹰﺎ ﻭﻣﺜﻠﹸﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻀﻌﻴﻔﺔ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺃﻋﻠﻢ.
- 154 -
ﺍﳋﺎﻣﺲ :ﺃ ﱠﻥ ﻟﻔﻈ ﹶﺔ "ﺍﺫﻛﹸﺮ" ﻋﺎ ﻣ ﹲﺔ ﲢﺘ ﻤ ﹸﻞ ﺍﻟﺬﻛ ﺮ ﺍـ ﺮ ﺩ
ﻉ" ﻣﺨﺼﺼ ﹲﺔ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺪﺍﺀِ ،ﻓﻴﺤ ﻤ ﹸﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺪﺍ َﺀ ﻭﻏﲑﳘﺎ ،ﻭﻛﻠﻤ ﹶﺔ "ﺍﺩ
ﺹ ﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﹸﺓ ﺍﳌﻘ ﺮﺭﺓ ﰲ ﺃﺻﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻪ، ﺍﻟﻌﺎ ﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳋﺎ ّﹺ
ﺕﻉ" ﻣﻘﻴ ﺪ ﹲﺓ ﻗﻴـ ﺪ
ﺃﻭ ﻳﻘﺎ ﹸﻝ ﻟﻔﻈ ﹸﺔ "ﺍﺫﻛﺮ" ﻣﻄﹶﻠ ﹶﻘ ﹲﺔ ﻭﻟﻔﻈ ﹸﺔ "ﺍﺩ
ﺍﻟﺬﻛ ﺮ ﺍﳌﻄﹶﻠ ﻖ ﺑﺎﻟﺪﻋﺎﺀ ،ﻭﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﺃﻋﻠ ﻢ ﻭﺃﺣﻜﻢ.
ﺃﻣﺎ ﻗﻮﳍﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴﺎ ﹸﺫ ﺑﺎﷲ ،ﻗﺪ ﻧﺎﺩﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﱯ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ
ﺽ ﺭﰊ ﻭﺭﺑﻚ ﺍﷲ( ﺍﺳـﺘﺪﻻ ﹰﻻﺽ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ) :ﻳﺎ ﺃﺭ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺍﻷﺭ
ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻧﺪﺍﺀ ﻏﲑ ﺍﳊﺎﺿﺮ ﰲ ﻏﲑ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﺎﺛﺔ ،ﻓﻬـﺬﺍ
ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﻣﻨﻬﻢ ،ﺃﻳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳـﻠﻢ
ﺍﳊ ّﹺﻲ ﰲ ﻗﱪﹺﻩ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻻ ﺗﻨﻘﻄﻊ ﺑﺮﻛﺎﺗﻪ ﻛﻨﺪﺍﺀ ﺍﳉﻤﺎﺩﺍﺕ؟ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺖ ﺣﻴﺎ
ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺑﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻪ) :ﻃﺒ
ﻭ ﻣﻴﺘﺎ( ﻳﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﺎﺩﺍﺕ؟ ﺃﻳﻘﺎﺭﻥ ﺑﺎﳉﻤﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻣﻦ ﻗﺎﻟﺖ ﻓﻴﻪ
ﻋﺎﺋﺸﺔ ﺭﺿﻲ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻨﻬﺎ:
ﺾ ﻳﺴﺘﺴﻘﹶﻰ ﺍﹾﻟ ﻐﻤﺎ ﻡ ﹺﺑ ﻮ ﺟ ﹺﻬ ﻪ
ﻭﺃﺑﻴ
ﻸﺭﺍ ﻣ ﹺﻞ
ﺼ ﻤ ﹲﺔ ﻟ َ
ﺭﺑﹺﻴ ﻊ ﺍﹾﻟﻴﺘﺎﻣﻰ ﻋ
ﺡ ﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ
ﺷﻴﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜ ﻲ ﻫﻮ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﻗﺎﻝ ﻓﻴﻪ ﺻﻼ
ﻱ :ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻟ ﻢ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﻣ ﹸﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻫـ ﺪ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺑـ ﺪ
ﺑ ﻦ ﺃﻳﺒﻚ ﺍﻟﺼﻔﺪ
- 163 -
ﻉ ﺍﶈ ّﻘ ﻖ ﺍﳌﺪّﻗ ﻖ ﺍﳌﺘﻔـّﹺﻨ ﻦﻉ ﺍﳋﺎﺷ ﻊ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ ﺳﻚ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﻳ ﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﻮ ﹺﺭ
ﺠ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟ ﹸﻔﻀﻼ ِﺀ ﺍﻟﻌﻼﹼﻣ ﹸﺔ ﺷﻴ ﺦ ﺍﻹﺳﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺣﺒ ﺮ ﺍﻷُﻣ ﺔ ﻗﺪﻭ ﹸﺓ ﺍﻷﺋﻤ ﺔ ﺣ
ﱄ
ﺴ ﺮ ﺍﻟﻔﻘﻴ ﻪ ﺍﻷﺻـﻮ ﱡ ﺙ ﺍﻟ ﺮ ﺣﹶﻠ ﹸﺔ ﺍﳌﻔ ِّ
ﺉ ﺍﶈ ّﺪ ﹸ
ﻕ ﺍﳌﻘﺮ ﻣﻔﱵ ﺍﻟﻔﺮ ﹺ
ﳉ ﺪﻟ ﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﻈﹼﺎ ﺭ ﺟﺎﻣ ﻊ ﺍﻟﻔﻨﻮ ﻥ ﻋﻼﹼﻣـ ﹸﺔ ﺐ ﺍﳌﻨﻄﻘ ﻲ ﺍ ﹶ
ﺍﻟﺒﻠﻴ ﹸﻎ ﺍﻷﺩﻳ
ﺍﻟﺰﻣﺎ ﻥ ﻗﺎﺿﻲ ﺍﻟﻘﹸﻀﺎ ﺓ ﺃﻭﺣ ﺪ ﺍﺘ ﹺﻬﺪﻳ ﻦ ﺗﻘ ﻲ ﺍﻟﺪﻳ ﹺﻦ ﺃﺑﻮ ﺍﳊﺴ ﹺﻦ
ﻱ ﺍﳊـﺎﻛ ﻢ
ﺴﺒ ﻜ ﻲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌ ﻲ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮ
ﳋ ﺰ ﺭ ﹺﺟ ﻲ ﺍﻟ
ﻱﺍﹶ
ﺍﻷﻧﺼﺎﺭ
ﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﺸﺎ ﹺﻡ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﻔﺴ ﲑ ﻓﻴﺎ ﺇﻣﺴﺎ ﻙ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻄﻴﺔﹶ ،ﻭﻭﻗﻮ
ﻉ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﺯ ّﹺ
ﺕ ﻓﻴﺎ ﺑﻌـ ﺪ ﺍﻟـﺪﺍﻧﹺﻲ ،ﻭﺑﺨـ ﹶﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﰲ ﺭ ﹺﺯﻳﺔ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺍﺀﺍ
ﺚ ﻓﻴﺎ ﻫﺰﳝـ ﹶﺔ ﻱ ﺑﺈﺗﻘﺎ ﻥ ﺍﻟﺴﺒ ﹺﻊ ﺍﳌﹶﺜﺎﱐ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳊﺪﻳـ ﹸ ﺍﻟﺴﺨﺎﻭ ّﹺ
ﺐ ﳌﹼﺎ ﺃ ﹾﻥ ﻳﺬﺍ ﻛﺮ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻷﺻﻮ ﹸﻝ ﻓﻴﺎ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﺴﺎﻛﺮ ،ﻭ ﻋ ﻲ ﺍﳋﻄﻴ ﹺ
ﺤﻴﻔﹶﻬـﺎ ﻒ ﺗ
ﻛﹶﻼ ﹶﻝ ﺣ ّﺪ ﺍﻟﺴﻴﻒ ،ﻭﻋﻈﻤ ﹶﺔ ﻓﺨ ﹺﺮ ﺍﻟﺪﻳ ﹺﻦ ﻛﻴـ
ﻚ ﻣـﻦ ﳉﻮﻳﹺﻨ ّﹺﻲ ﰲ ﺃ ﻭ ﹺﻝ ﻣﻬﻠ
ﻉﺍﹸ
ﳊﻴﻒ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘ ﻪ ﻓﻴﺎ ﻭﻗﻮ ﺍﹶ
ﺏ ﻋﹶﻠ ﻤ ﻪ
ﺎﻳ ﺔ ﺍﳌﻄﻠﺐﹺ ،ﻭ ﺟ ﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺍﻓﻌ ّﹺﻲ ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﻜﺴ ﹺﺮ ﺑﻌ ﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎ ﹺ
ﺐ ﰲ ﺍ ﹶﳌ ﹾﺬﻫﺐ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﺍﻟﹸﻤ ﹶﺬ ﻫ ﹺ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻫﻮ ﺑﻌﻴﻨﹺﻪ ﺍﻟﺬﻱ ﺗﻄﺎﻭﻝ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻷﻟﻮﺳـ ﻲ ﻭﺍﺗﻬﻤـﻪ
ﺐ ﺍﻟـﺸﺎﻓﻌ ﹺﻲّ،ﺑﺎﳍﺬﻳﺎ ﻥ ﻭﺭ ﺩّ ﺍﳊ ّﹺﻖ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﻌ ﺪّﻱ ﺣﱴ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺬﻫ ﹺ
ﲏ ﻓﻬـﻮ ﻭﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻜﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺧ ﱠﻄﹶﺄ ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺃﺑﺎ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﱄ ﺍﳉـﻮﻳ
ﻓﻤﺤﺎﺭﺑ ﹸﺔ ﺍﻟﺸﺮ ﻙ ﻛﻠﻤ ﹸﺔ ﺣ ّﹴﻖ ﺃﹸﺭﻳ ﺪ ـﺎ ﺍﻟﺒﺎﻃـﻞﹸ ،ﻷ ﹼﻥ
ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔ ﲑ ﻫﻨﺎ ﻭﻗ ﻊ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ،ﻟﻜﻦ ﺃﲪﺪ ﺑﺎﴰﻴﻞ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻞ
ﱂ ﻳﺪ ﹺﺭ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻛﻔﹼﺮﻫﻢ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﲰـﺎﻫﻢ "ﻣـﺴﻠﻤﲔ"
ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﻟﻪ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮﻝ ،ﻭﷲ ﰲ ﺧﻠﻘﻪ ﺷﺌﻮﻥ.
ﺕ ﺃ ﹼﻥ ﺻـﺎﺣﺒﻬﻢ ﺃﺑـﺎ ﺍﳊـﺴﻦ ﺐ ﺍﳌﻤﻘﻮ ﻭﻣ ﻦ ﺍﻟﻌﺠﻴ ﹺ
ﺏ ﻭﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ" ﺑﺄﻥ ﻟـﻮﺭﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﻟﻨﺪﻭﻱ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﹺﻪ "ﺍﻟﻌﺮ
ﻒ
ﺏ ﻓﺜﺎﺭ ﺍﻟﺸﺮﻳ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻫﻴ ﹶﺔ ﻗﺎﻡ ﺑﺪﻭﺭﹺﻩ ﻓﺄﺷﻌﻞ ﺍﳊﻤﺎﺱ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻌﺮ ﹺ
ﲔ ﰲ ﺍﳊﺠﺎﺯ ﻭﺃﻫ ﹺﻞ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ "ﺍﻹﻣﱪﺍﻃﻮﺭﻳﺔ ﺣﺴ
ﺍﻟﻌﺜﻤﺎﻧﻴﺔ" ،ﻭﱂ ﻳﺬﻛﺮ ﻛﱪﻯ ﺍﳌﻌﺎﺭ ﻙ ﺑﲔ ﺍﳋﻼﻓ ﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﻮﻫﺎﺑﻴﲔ
ﻓﻘﺪ ﺃﺗﻌﺒﻮﺍ ﺍﳋﻼﻓ ﹶﺔ ﻭﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺑﺸﻴﻄﻨﺘﻬﻢ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ "ﻫﺎﻩ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﺸﺮﻛﻮﻥ" ﻭﻳﻘﺘﻠﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﺴﻔﻜﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﺴﺘﺒﻴﺤﻮﻥ ﻭﳚﺎﻫـﺪﻭﻥ
ﰲ ﻗﺘﺎﻝ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻛﲔ ﻋﻨﺪﻫﻢ – ﻭﻫﻢ ﳓﻦ ﺃﻫ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻨﺔ – ﻓﻠﻤﺎﺫﺍ
ﺺ
ﻚ ﻣ ﹶﺬﻣﱵ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﻗ ﹴ
ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺃﺗ ﺘ
ﻱ ﻓﻴﻨﻌﺘﻪ ﺑﺄﻧـﻪ
ﺐ ﻓﻜ ﺮ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﺧ ﹺﲑ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭ
ﰒ ﻳﺴﺘﻘ ﻄ
ﺏ ﻓﻜ ﹴﺮ "ﺍﻹﻣﺎ ﻡ ﺍﺘﻬ ﺪ ﺍّ ﺪ ﺩ" ،ﻭﺃﻣﺜﺎ ﹸﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻛﺜﲑﻭﻥﹶ ،ﺃﺻﺤﺎ
ﺧﻄ ﹴﲑ ﺑﺪﻋﻮﻯ ﺍﻟﻨﻬـﻀ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻔﻜﺮﻳـ ﺔ )ﺍﳌﺎﺳـﻮﻧﻴﺔ( ﻓـﻴ ﻐ ﲑ
ﻑﺚ ﺍﳌﻌﺎ ﹺﺯ ﻒ ﺣﺪﻳ ﹶ ﻱ ﻳﻀ ّﻌ ﻱ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺻﺤﻴ ﹺﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﺨﺎﺭ ّﹺ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺿﺎﻭ
ﻅ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺰ ﹴﻡ ﻭﺃﻧﻪ ﹶﻃ ﻌ ﻦ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪﺍ ﻻﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺣﺰ ﹴﻡ ﻣﻊ ﺇﻧﻜﺎ ﹺﺭ ﺍﳊﻔﺎ
ﺲ ﺍﳌﺮﺃ ﺓ ﺍﻷﺟﻨﺒﻴ ﺔ ﺑﻐـ ﹺﲑ ﻓﻴ ﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺼﺎﺭﺍ ﳌﺬﻫﺒﹺﻪ ﺍﻟﺮﺩﻱﺀ ،ﻭﳚﻴ ﺰ ﳌ
ﺖ ﻭﻳﻮﺍﻓـﻖ ﰲ ﻉ ﺍﻟﺜﺎﺑ ﻕ ﺬﺍ ﺍﻹﲨﺎ ﺣﺎﺋ ﹴﻞ ﻭﻗﺪ ﲰﻌﺘﻪ ،ﻓﻴﺨ ﹺﺮ
ﺏ ﺍﳉﻬ ﹺﻞ ﻭﺍﻟﻔﻠﺴﻔ ﺔ ﺍﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮ ﹶﻥ ﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳ ﹺﺮ( ﺣﺰ ﻫﺬﺍ )ﺣﺰ
– ﻭﻗﺎﳍﺎ ﱄ ﺃﺣ ﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳّﹺﻴﻴﻬﻢ :ﺻﺪﻗﲏ ﻳﺎ ﺃﺧﻲ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﳋﻼﻓ ﺔ
ﺖ ﺃﹾﻟﻔﹰـﺎ ﺐ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺮ ِﺀ ﺷﻰ ٌﺀ ﻻ ﺻﻼ ﹲﺓ ﻭﻻ ﻏﲑﻫﺎ ،ﺳﻜ ﻻﳚ
ﺖ ﺩﻫﺮﺍ ﻭﻧﻄ ﻖ ﻛﻔﺮﺍ ،ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻴﺎﺫ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻣﻦ ﻭﻧﻄ ﻖ ﺧ ﹾﻠﻔﹰﺎ ،ﺑﻞ ﺳﻜ
ﺏ ﺍﻟﺘﺤﺮﻳ ﹺﺮ ﳛﺘﺠﻮ ﹶﻥ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻜﻔﺮﹺ ﺍﻟﺼﺮﻳﺢﹺ ،ﻫﺆﻻ ِﺀ ﲨﺎﻋ ﹸﺔ ﺣﺰ ﹺ
ﺽ ﹶﺃﻗﹶﺎﻣﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻼ ﹶﺓ ﻭﺀَﺍﺗﻮﺍ
ﺑﺎﻵﻳ ﺔ) :ﺍﱠﻟﺬﻳ ﻦ ﹺﺇ ﹾﻥ ﻣ ﱠﻜﻨﺎ ﻫ ﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷ ﺭ ﹺ
ﻑ ﻭﻧ ﻬﻮﺍ ﻋ ﹺﻦ ﺍﹾﻟ ﻤﻨﻜﹶـﺮ( ،ﻭﱂ ﻳـﺪ ﹺﺭ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎ ﹶﺓ ﻭﹶﺃ ﻣﺮﻭﺍ ﺑﹺﺎﹾﻟﻤﻌﺮﻭ
ﻫﺆﻻ ِﺀ ﺍﻟﻀﺎﻟﹼﻮﻥ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻵﻳ ﹶﺔ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻜﻼ ﹺﻡ ﻋﻦ ﺍﳌﺴﻠﻤﲔ ﺇﺫﺍ ﻣ ﹼﻜﻨﻬﻢ
ﷲ ﰲ ﻓﺘ ﹺﺢ ﺍﻟﺒﻼ ﺩ ﻧﺸﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﻹﺳﻼﻡ ،ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻌﲎ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻹﻣﺎﻡ ﺍُ
- 172 -
ﺽ(ﺍﻟﻄﱪﻱ ﰲ ﺗﻔﺴﲑﹺﻩ :ﻭﻳﻌﲏ ﺑﻘﻮﻟﻪ) :ﹺﺇ ﹾﻥ ﻣ ﱠﻜﻨﺎ ﻫ ﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺍﻷ ﺭ ﹺ
ﺇﻥ ﻭ ﱠﻃﻨﺎ ﳍﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻟﺒﻼﺩ ،ﻓﻘﻬﺮﻭﺍ ﺍﳌﺸﺮﻛﲔ ﻭﻏﻠﺒﻮﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﻬﺎ،
ﺏ ﺭﺳﻮ ﹺﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ،ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﺇ ﹾﻥ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺃﺻﺤﺎ
ﺼﺮﻧﺎﻫﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺋﻬﻢ ﻭﻗﻬﺮﻭﺍ ﻣﺸﺮ ﻛﻲ ﻣﻜ ﹶﺔ ،ﺃﻃﺎﻋﻮﺍ ﺍﷲ، ﻧ
ﻓﺄﻗﺎﻣﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ ﲝﺪﻭﺩﻫﺎ) ،ﻭﺀﺍﺗ ﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﺰﻛﺎﺓ( ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﺃﻋﻄﹶـﻮﺍ
ﻑ( ﻳﻘﻮﻝ: ﷲ ﻟﻪ ) ﻭﹶﺃ ﻣﺮﻭﺍ ﹺﺑﺎﹾﻟ ﻤ ﻌﺮﻭ
ﺯﻛﺎ ﹶﺓ ﺃﻣﻮﺍﻟﻬﻢ ﻣﻦ ﺟ ﻌﹶﻠﻬﺎ ﺍ ُ
ﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤ ﹺﻞ ﺑﻄﺎﻋﺘﻪ ﻭﻣﺎ ﻳﻌﺮﹸﻓﻪ ﺃﻫ ﹸﻞ ﺱ ﺇﱃ ﺗﻮﺣﻴ ﺪ ﺍ ِ ﻭ ﺩ ﻋﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ
ﺍﻹﳝﺎ ﻥ ﺑﺎﷲ ) ﻭﻧ ﻬﻮﺍ ﻋ ﹺﻦ ﺍﹾﻟ ﻤﻨ ﹶﻜ ﹺﺮ( ﻳﻘﻮﻝ :ﻭﻧ ﻬﻮﺍ ﻋﻦ ﺍﻟـﺸﺮ ﻙ
ﺻﻴﻪ ،ﺍﻟﺬﻱ – ﺃﻱ ﺍﳌﻨ ﹶﻜ ﺮ -ﻳﻨ ﻜ ﺮﻩ ﺃﻫ ﹸﻞ ﺍﳊ ّﹺﻖ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﻤ ﹺﻞ ﲟﻌﺎ
ﻭﺍﻹﳝﺎ ﻥ ﺑﺎﷲ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ
ﺕ ﺍﻟـﺴّﹺﻴ ﺪ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻗﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺃﻫ ﹺﻞ ﺍﻟﻌﻠ ﹺﻢ ﰲ ﺍﻵﻳﺔ ،ﻭﻋﻨﺪﻣﺎ ﺃﺧﱪ
ﺐ ﺟـﺪﺍ ﷲ ﺗﻌﺠـ ﺕﺍِ ﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺭ ﺣﻤﺎ ﷲ ﺍﳍﺮﺭ ﺍﻟ ﻌﻼﱠﻣ ﹶﺔ ﻋﺒ ﺪ ﺍ ِ
ﻭﻗﺎﻝ ﱄ :ﻗﻞ ﳍﻢ ﺍﻟﺮﺳﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﺑﻘ ﻲ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ
ﷲ ﻟـﻪ ﰲ ﺍﻷﺭﺽﹺ، ﺙ ﻋﺸﺮ ﹶﺓ ﺳﻨ ﹰﺔ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺃﻥ ﳝ ّﻜ ﻦ ﺍ ُ
ﷲ ﺛﻼ ﹶ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ِ
ﺃﱂ ﻳﻜﻦ ﻭﺻﺤﺎﺑﺘﻪ ﻳﻘﻴﻤﻮ ﹶﻥ ﺍﻟﺼﻼﺓ .ﻭﺻ ﺮﺡ ﺑﻜﻔ ﹺﺮ ﻗﺎﺋ ﹺﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ
ﺹ ﻛﻔ ﺮﺏ ﺍﻟﻘﺮﺀﺍﻥ ﻭﻳﺮ ﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺺ ،ﻭﺭ ﺩ ﺍﻟﻨﺼﻮ ﹺ ﺍﻟﻘﻮ ﹺﻝ ﻷﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﺬ
ﻼ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎ
ﷲ ﺍﻟﺸﻴ ﺦ ﺣﺴﻦ ﺍﻟﺒﻨﺎ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺭﺟ ﹰ
ﻭﺭﺣﻢ ﺍ ُ
ﺺ ﻣﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺣﻮﻟﹶﻪ ﻓﻜﺎﻧﻮﺍ ﺃﻛﺜﺮ ﱂ ﻳﺘﻔ ﻖ ﻣﻨﻬﺠﻪ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﰲ ﺍﳋﺎﻟ
ﺍﺭﺗﻴﺎﺣﺎ ﻟﻘﺘﻠﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺃﻋﺪﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻛﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻜﻴﺪ ﹰﺓ ﺩّﹺﺑﺮﺕ
ﺕ ﺃ ﹾﻥ
ﻉ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﻝ) :ﺃﹸﻣﺮ
ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﺭ
ﷲ ﻭﺃﱐ ﺭﺳﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺍﷲ(
ﺱ ﺣﱴ ﻳﺸﻬﺪﻭﺍ ﺃ ﹾﻥ ﻻ ﺇﻟ ﻪ ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺍ ُ
ﺃﻗﺎﺗ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟﻨﺎ
ﻭﺍﳌﺴﺘﻌﺎ ﹸﻥ ﻫﻮ ﺍﷲ.
ﻓﺎﳋﻼﺻ ﹸﺔ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻛ ّﹺﻞ ﻫﺬﺍ ،ﺃﻥ ﻗﻮ ﹶﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻷﻟﻮﺳ ّﹺﻲ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺧ ﹺﺮ
ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﳌﺘﺄﺛ ﹺﺮ ﺑﺎﻟﻔﻜﺮ ﺍﻟﺘﻜﻔﲑﻱ) :ﻭﻫﻞ ﻛﺎﻥ ﻛ ﱡﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺪﺭﺕ
ﺭﺟﻠﹸﻪ ﻳﺴﺘﻐﻴﺚ ﺑﺄﺣﺐ ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﻏﻼﻣﺎ ﺃﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﺃﺓ ﻳﻐﻴﺜﹸـﻪ؟ ﻻ
ﻳﻘﻮ ﹸﻝ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺪﺭ ﻋﻘﻠﹸﻪ( ﻣﺮﺩﻭ ﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺗﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﳌﺎ ﻫـﻮ
ﺴﺒﻲ ﺍﻟـﱵ ﺫﻛﺮﺗﻬـﺎ ﺣﺴ ﻦ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻏﲑ ﻭﺍﻟﺮﺩ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﲟﺴﺌﻠﺔ ﺍﻟ
ﻳﻜﻔﻲ.
ﺐ ﻗﻮ ﹰﻻ ﺳﻠﻴﻤﺎ
ﻓﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺎﺋ ﹴ
ﻭﺀﺍﻓﹶـﺘـ ﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻟﻔﹶﻬ ﹺﻢ ﺍﻟﺴﻘﻴ ﹺﻢ
ﺽ ﻳﻄـ ﺮﹸﺃ
ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﳌﺸﺎﻳ ﺦ ﻳﻘﻮﻟﻮﻥ :ﺍﻟﻔﻬ ﻢ ﻋـ ﺮ
ﺐ ﺍﳊﻖ ﲟﻦ ﻓﻬﻤﻪ ﻳﺰﻭ ﹸﻝ ﻭﻻ ﻳﻄﺮﺃ. ﻭﻳﺰﻭﻝﹸ ،ﻓﻜﻴﻒ ﺑﺎﷲ ﻳﺎ ﻃﺎﻟ
ﺐ
ﰒ ﻟﻴﻌﻠ ﻢ ﺃﻧﻪ ﻟﻴﺲ ﺷﺮﻃﹰﺎ ﻭﻻ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎ ﻻﺯﻣﺎ ﺃﻥ ﻳـﺬﻫ
ﺐ ﺃﻣـﻮ ﹴﺭ
ﺽ ﺍﳌﺎﻧ ﻊ ﻟﻠﻘﺎﺋ ﹺﻞ ﺑﺴﺒ ﹺ
ﺍﳋ ﺪ ﺭ ﰲ ﻛ ّﹺﻞ ﻣﺮﺓ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﻳﻌ ﹺﺮ
ﷲ ﻟﻪ ﲣﻔﻴﻔﺎ ﻟﺴﻴﺌﺎﺗ ﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺭﻓﻌﺎ ﻋﺪﻳﺪ ﺓ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﻴﻪ ﺃﻭ ﺍﺑﺘﻼ ُﺀ ﺍ ِ
ﻟﺪﺭﺟﺎﺗﻪ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﳌﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻟﻪ ﺃﺑﻮ ﻫﺮﻳﺮﺓ ﺃﻧﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ
ﺚ ﺃﻏ ﱪ ﳝ ﺪ ﻳﺪﻳ ﻪ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ) :ﺫ ﹶﻛ ﺮ ﺍﻟﺮﺟ ﹶﻞ ﻳﻄﻴ ﹸﻞ ﺍﻟﺴﻔ ﺮ ﺃﺷﻌ ﹶ
ﺏ ﻭ ﻣﻄ ﻌ ﻤﻪ ﺣﺮﺍ ﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺸ ﺮﺑﻪ ﺣـﺮﺍ ﻡ
ﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺭ
ﺇﱃ ﺍﻟﺴﻤﺎ ِﺀ :ﻳﺎ ﺭ
- 179 -
ﺏ ﻟﺬﻟﻚ( .ﺭﻭﺍﻩ
ﻱ ﺑﺎﳊﺮﺍ ﹺﻡ ﻓﹶﺄﻧﻰ ﻳﺴﺘﺠﺎ
ﺴﻪ ﺣﺮﺍ ﻡ ﻭ ﹸﻏ ﺬ
ﻭ ﻣﻠﺒ
ﻣﺴﻠﻢ
ﻚ
ﷲ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺋ ﹶﻞ ﰲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﹺﻪ ﺍﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ) :ﻭﺇﺫﺍ ﺳﺄﹶﻟ
ﻓﻬﺎ ﻫﻮ ﻳﺪﻋﻮ ﺍ َ
ﺐ ﺩﻋﻮ ﹶﺓ ﺍﻟﺪﺍﻋ ﻲ ﺇﺫﺍ ﺩﻋـﺎ ﻥ(
ﺐ ﺃﹸﺟﻴ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﻱ ﻋﹺﻨّﻲ ﻓﺈﱐ ﻗﺮﻳ
ﺍﻟﺒﻘﺮﺓ .186
ﺐ ﻟﻪ ﺇﻧـﻪ
ﺠ
ﷲ ﻭﱂ ﻳﺴﺘ ﹺﻓﻬﻞ ﻳﻘﺎﻝ ﺑﺄ ﱠﻥ ﻛ ﱠﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺩﻋﺎ ﺍ َ
ﺲ ﻣﺠﻴﺒﺎ ،ﻻ ﻳﻘﻮ ﹸﻝ ﺬﺍ ﺇﻻ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺪﺭ ﻋﻘﻠﹸﻪ ﺃﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻷﻟﻮﺳﻲ.
ﻟﻴ
ﻭﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻘﻮ ﹸﻝ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺧﺪﺭ ﺍﻟﺮﺟﻞ ﺃﻭ ﻏﲑﹺﻫﺎ ﻟﻴﺲ ﻭﺍﺟﺒـﺎ
ﻭﻻ ﺃﺣ ﺪ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﺬﺍ ﺑﻞ ﻫﻮ ﺟﺎﺋ ﺰ ﺇﻥ ﺷﺎ َﺀ ﻧﺎﺩﻯ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺷـﺎﺀ
ﺏ ﺍﳉﺎﻫﻠﻴﺔ
ﺫ ﹶﻛ ﺮ ﻭﺇﻥ ﺷﺎ َﺀ ﺗﺮﻙ ،ﻭﻣﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﻰ ﺃﻥ ﺍﻟﻜ ﱠﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻋﺮ ﹺ
ﺐ
ﻓﻤﻦ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﻢ ﺫﻫﺐ ﻋﻨﻬﻢ ﺍﳋﺪﺭ ﰲ ﻛ ّﹺﻞ ﻣﺮﺓ ﻧﺎﺩﻭﺍ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﺣ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺇﻟﻴﻬﻢ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻛﺬﺏ ﻛﺬﺑﺎ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺎ.
ﺷﺒﻬ ﹲﺔ ﺃﺧﺮﻯ:
ﻗﺎﻟﻮﺍ ﻭﻛﻴﻒ ﺗﺴﺘﺪﻟﻮﻥ ﲝﺪﻳﺚ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﻋﻤـ ﺮ ﺭﺿـﻲ ﺍﷲ
ﻋﻨﻬﻤﺎ ﰲ ﺟﻮﺍﺯ ﺍﻻﺳﺘﻐﺎﺛ ﺔ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﷲ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺳﻠﻢ ﻭﻫـﻮ
ﻣﺬﻛﻮ ﺭ ﰲ ﺍﻵﺩﺍﺏ ﰲ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻘﻮﻝ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺟﻠﹸﻪ.
ﻉ ﺇﺫ ﻓﺈﻥ ﻗﻴ ﹶﻞ ﺇﻧﻪ ﻳﺬﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻠﺴﺎ ﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ،ﻗﻠﻨﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﳑﻨـﻮ
ﺐ ﻭﺧﻄﻮﺭﻩ ﻻ ﻳﺬﻛ ﺮ ﺑﻠﺴﺎﻧﹺﻪ ﺇﻻ ﻭﻗﺪ ﺧﻄ ﺮ ﻟﻪ ﺍﺳ ﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻳﺤ
ﺏ ﻭﺍ ﹺﺭﺩﺍ
ﺇﳕﺎ ﻳﻜﻮ ﹸﻥ ﰲ ﺍﻟﻘﻠﺐﹺ ،ﻓﻘﺪ ﺻﺤﺖ ﺻﻮﺭ ﹸﺓ ﺍﶈﺒـﻮ ﹺ
ﻗﻠﺒﻴﺎ ﻓﺄﺟﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻟﺴﺎﻧﹺﻪ ،ﻓﺘﻨﺒﻪ.
ﻳﻘﺎ ﹸﻝ ﻷﻫ ﹺﻞ ﻫﺬﻩ ﺍﻟﻈﺎﻫﺮﻳ ﺔ ،ﻻ ﻳ ﺰ ﺭ ﺃﺣ ﺪ ﻣﻨﻜﻢ ﺃﻫﹶﻠ ﻪ ﻛ ﱠﻞ
ﺚ ﺍﻟـﻮﺍﺭ ﺩ ﰲ ﻳﻮ ﹴﻡ ﻭﺃﻧﺘﻢ ﻋﻠﻰ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻳﺘﻜﻢ ﻫﺬﻩ ،ﻷ ﹼﻥ ﺍﳊﺪﻳ ﹶ
ﻑ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻫﻮ ) :ﺯ ﺭ ﻏﺒﺎ ﺗ ﺰ ﺩ ﺩ ﺣﺒﺎ(
ﺍﻟﺰﻳﺎﺭ ﺓ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﻼ
ﻱ ﻣﺴﺌﻠ ﹶﺔ ﻛﺮﺍﻫ ﺔ ﺍﻟﻮﺿﻮ ِﺀ ﺑﺎﳌـﺎ ِﺀ ﻉ ﺍﻟﻨﻮﻭ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻭﻗﺪ ﻧﺎ ﺯ
ﺹ ﻭﻫـﻮ ﻣـﻦ ﺙ ﺍﻟ ﱪ ﺲ ﰲ ﺑﻠ ﺪ ﺣﺎ ّﹴﺭ ﺧﺸﻴ ﹶﺔ ﺃ ﹾﻥ ﻳﻮ ﹺﺭ ﹶﺍﳌﹸﺸ ﻤ ﹺ
ﲔ ﺍﳌﺨﺎﻟﻔﲔ
ﻭﺍﻗ ﻊ ﻻ ﺑﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﹺﻧ ﻪ ﺑﻴﻨﻨﺎ ﻭﺑ
ﻚ ﺑﺎﳌﺪﺍ ﺩ
ﺕ ﻭﺟ ﻬ
ﻭﻟﻮ ﺳﻮ ﺩ
ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﷲ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ ﻋﺰ ﻭﺟﻞ) :ﻓﺎﺳﺌﻠﻮﺍ ﺃﻫ ﹶﻞ ﺍﻟ ﺬ ﹾﻛ ﹺﺮ ﺇ ﹾﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﻢ
ﻚ ﻓﹶﻬﻤﺎ ﻭﺻـﺪﻗﹰﺎ ﺴ ﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺬﺍ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔ ِ ﺴ
ﻻ ﺗﻌﻠﻤﻮﻥ( ﻓﺈ ﹾﻥ ﺀﺍﻧ
ﻚ ﺍﳍـﻮﻯ ﻭﺩﻳﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻭ ﺭﻋﺎ ﻭﺇ ﹼﻻ ﻓﻼ ﺗﺘ ﻌ ﻦْ ،ﻭﺇ ﹾﻥ ﻏﻠـﺐ ﻋﻠﻴـ
ﻚ
ﺖ ﺃﻧـ ﺐ ﻓﺒﺎﷲ ﻻ ﺗﺘﻌﺐ ،ﻭﺍﻥ ﻋﺮﻓ ﻭﺍﻟﻌﺼﺒﻴ ﹸﺔ ﻟﺮﺃﻱﹴ ﻭﳌﺬﻫ ﹴ
ﷲ ﻓﹶﺄ ﹺﺭ ﺣﻨﺎ ﻣﻨﻚ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ﻂ ﻣﻬ ﻤ ﹲﻞ ﳊﺪﻭ ﺩ ﺍ ِ
ﺨّﹺﺒ ﹲ
ﻂ ﻣ
ﺨّﻠ ﹲ
ﻣ
ﻭﻗﻮﻟﹸﻪ "ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ" ﺃﻱ ﺇ ﹾﻥ ﻻ ﺗﻔﻌﻞ ﺇﻥ ﺍﻟـﺸﺮﻃﻴﺔ ﻭﻻ
ﺼ ﺮ ﻩ ﺍﷲ( ،ﺃﻱ ﺇ ﹾﻥ ﻻ
ﺼﺮﻭ ﻩ ﻓ ﹶﻘ ﺪ ﻧ
ﺍﻟﻨﺎﻓﻴﺔ ﻛﻘﻮﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﺎﱃ) :ﺇ ﹼﻻ ﺗﻨ
ﺗﻨﺼﺮﻭﻩ ﻓﻘﺪ ﻧﺼﺮﻩ ﺍﷲ.
ﱯ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻟﺴﺒﻌﻤﺎﺋﺔ:
ﰒ ﻗﺎﻝ ﺍﻟﺬﻫ
ﺖﰲ ﻗ ﱠﻞ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺘـﲏ ﺑﺎﻵﺛـﺎ ﹺﺭ ﻭﻣﻌﺮﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﰲ ﻫﺬﺍ ﺍﻟﻮﻗ
ﺏ
ﻕ ﻭﺃﻗﺎﻟﻴﻤﻪ ﹶﻓ ﻐّﻠ ﻖ ﺍﻟﺒﺎ
ﺽ ﻭﻣﻐﺎﺭﺑﹺﻬﺎ ،ﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﺸ ﹺﺮ
ﻕ ﺍﻷﺭ ﹺ
ﻣﺸﺎﺭ ﹺ
ﺏ ﻭﻣﺎ ﺑﻘﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺰﻳﺮ ﺓ ﺍﻷﻧﺪﻟﺲ ﻭﺍﻧﻘﻄ ﻊ ﺍﳋﻄﺎﺏ ،ﻭﺃﻣﺎ ﺍﳌﻐﺮ
ﻓﻨ ﺪ ﺭ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻌﺘﲏ ﺑﺎﻟﺮﻭﺍﻳـ ﺔ ﻛﻤـﺎ ﻳﻨﺒﻐـﻲ ﻓـﻀﻼ ﻋـﻦ
ﺍﻟﺪﺭﺍﻳﺔ.ﺍﻧﺘﻬﻰ ،ﻓﺈﻧﺎ ﷲ ﻭﺇﻧﺎ ﺇﻟﻴﻪ ﺭﺍﺟﻌﻮﻥ.
ِ
َ
َ
ﺼ ﺮ
ﲏ ﺍﻟﺮﺀﻭﻑ ﻋﺒﺪﻩ ﺍﳌﻘ ّ ﻭﻛﺘﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﻟﻔﻘ ﲑ ﺇﱃ ﺭﲪ ﺔ ﺍﷲ ﺍﻟﻐ ّﹺ
ﻱ ﺍﻟﺸﺎﻓﻌ ﻲ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﺎﻋ ﻲ
ﲏ ﺍﻷﺷﻌﺮ ﳎﺪﻱ ﻏﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﳊﺴﻴ
ﺐ ﻭﻋﺎﻣﻠﻪ ﺑﻠﻄﻔﻪ ﺀﺍﻣﲔ ﲝـ ّﹺﻖ ﻏﻔﺮ ﺍﷲ ﻟﻪ ﻭﳌﺸﺎﳜﻪ ﻭﻣﻦ ﺃﺣ
ﷲ ﻭﻋﻠﻰ ﲨﻴ ﹺﻊ ﺇﺧﻮﺍﻧﹺـ ﻪ ﺕﺍِ ﺳّﹺﻴ ﺪ ﺍ ﹸﳌ ﹶﻜ ﻤﻠﲔ ﳏﻤ ﺪ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺻﻠﻮﺍ
ﻍ ﻣﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﻴﻠ ﹶﺔ ﺍﻟﺴﺎﺑ ﹺﻊ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺑﻴ ﹴﻊ ﺍﻵﺧﺮ ﺳﻨﺔ ﲔ ﻭﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﻔﺮﺍ ﹸ ﺍﻟﻨﺒّﹺﻴ
ﷲ ﻋﻠﻴـﻪ ﺃﺯﻛـﻰ ﺏ ﺇﱃ ﺍ ِﺐ ﺍﻷﺣﺒﺎ ﹺ 1430ﻣﻦ ﻫﺠﺮ ﺓ ﺃﺣ ّﹺ
ﺻﻼ ﺓ ﻭﺳﻼ ﹺﻡ ﺍﷲ ،ﻭﺳﻼ ﻡ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺍﳌﺮﺳﻠﲔ ﻭﺍﳊﻤـﺪ ﷲ ﺭﺏ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﳌﲔ
ﻉ ﻋـﻦ
ﺐ ﺍﻷﻭﺗﺎ ﺩ ﰲ ﺍﻟـﺪﻓﺎ ﹺ
ﻭﻳﺘﻠﻮﻩ ﺑﻌﻮﻥ ﺍﷲ )ﻧﺼ
ﺍﻟﺮﻓﺎﻋﻴ ﺔ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴ ﺔ ﺍﻷﺳﻴﺎﺩ(
ﱯّ ﻭﻣـﻦ
ﺕ ﺍﺑ ﹺﻦ ﺗﻴﻤﻴـ ﹶﺔ ﻭﺍﻟـﺬﻫ ﹺ
ﻭﻫﻮ ﺇﺑﻄﺎ ﹲﻝ ﻟﺸﺒﻬﺎ
ﺕ ﺍﻟﺮﻓﺎﻋﻴ ﺔ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻭﺍﻟﺼﻮﻓﻴ ﺔ ﲟﺎ
ﻭﺍﻓﻘﹶﻬﻤﺎ ﺣﻮ ﹶﻝ ﻛﺮﺍﻣﺎ
ﺖ ﻋﻤﻮ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻔﻌﻨـﺎ
ﻳﺸ ﻤ ﹸﻞ ﺃﻭﻟﻴﺎ َﺀ ﺍﻟﺼﺤﺎﺑ ﺔ ﻭﺃﻭﻟﻴﺎ َﺀ ﺃﻫ ﹺﻞ ﺍﻟﺒﻴ
ﺕ ﻧﻔﻴﺴ ﹲﺔ ﻻ ﻳـﺴﺘﻐﲏ ﻋﻨـﻬﺎ
ﺍﷲ ﻢ ﺀﺍﻣﲔ ،ﻭﻓﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻗﺸﺎ
ﺐ ﺣﻖ ﺑﺈﺫ ﻥ ﺍﷲ.
ﻃﺎﻟ