UNLTED STATE DMI KVYCI Cocuct for THE DEsT REET OF NEM HAM PSHTEE INETED STATES OF AMERTOA Corporate Femin) | TARESDECTION Vv. CHALLENTE DAATEL RILEY Cfeton medle by USA) case * Lor1-cr- (PG-ov- 6 oe oie balling & Speeial appearence, Danie Riley , ack in ee pach 1 Yerios Sugrious representing the Sichién DANTEL 1 Gnd makes this Challenge to te havkrupt torporecion UNTTED TATES GF AMERTOA’s JuriScheton, ard does so pone focre. The Supene Cont of the Undeel States hes stated that a BAiCied process tan net proceed any further Urh'l jurdidictia hes been woven. The Srgceme Court has alse sdatecl ata Sovereign mas actig s hes own Counsel mast have his pleadiags Iberalhy constracd, (1 07Z0r) 70 Comred gage trae Feeritorial jactsdichen of tle Uaitel Stetes is lebined ce section F dlawse MY ot the US conshrtchen ? ES ib toue thet tHeritoriol jurisdiction ts clefiacd ard hmited +0 the Steet of Columbia and all places pugchased by tte consent of the legislature vrhe state in whieh the same Shall be? 3, £5 ct true subject matter jarishiehda ot He Unted Sates 13 cledined 1 article TE section 2 oF the US Constiztctioa 2, Y.Ts ct true subjcet mater jumacestréa iS debined as; all cases ablecting mbassaders, other public. mintvters and eoasels, +o all cases oF adeaitalty and acitine juriichiction, to controversies which He United Shefes shell be a party) te atroversies between fue or more states, between a State andl Citizens of another tafe, bedyrcen citizens of ditterent stetes, and between a state, or rhe Cifivens seve ot aad Foreign stapes, citreras of subjects ? STs it true the UNETED STATES has no Jarstdictin over He sovereign niet Riley, unless he enters The District of Columbia or cae of tt4 beceitoves & Balls under one OF He Subject matter yurtsdtiows ?G. is i+ true tle UNLTED S7TAIES Fas WL (eration 17 Tre ountay er State of NEw tlempehire 7 1. Fs it trae that on Tune 14, 1963 th Secretary of State for the uate of Neu Hampshire offered concurrent JerSdichon te the Usrrety Hetes of Amenice, and tt reFuseclit ? BT db teue Mew Hampshire State saws RSA 1BS:1 reguires the WITED STATES To File He proper paperwank with fhe She db Wen Hampshire efere He UNTIED Stakes cam eperede Wits The Jansclicten ob Meu Hawrosh ied Q rs c+ true phat Me BSA 12316 documentation regurreo/ by (aww, has rever been Filecl with fle Secretory of Stake ob wew Hantpshre by the (wEreD s7mTeEs ? (0. Ps cH frie He UNTTED THAR OF AmERTtA 18a Corporation ? Ts TH true Officers of He Unrteot States of Amerie, lo not have social sturthy dedluctea From their peyghecks ? IR. DS th true employ ees of te conporetion UNETED STAVE OP AMERICA wwe Social Seeurtty deducted From herr poy cheeks 2 13. Ts re true He. Tualger are enployees of re corporation UNETEO TAPES oF AMERICA cant have socien) security decluctee from their foychecles ? oekers $e qwoge in This case) 14. Ds 7} que emphyees of te UNITED STATES are not-aufhor 20! tHe US constitution therefere Hey can not be Anche IT judges ? 1S TT 4rue the UNZDTED STATES VFSTRECT COBRT OP WAN HAMPSATRE not the same as an Uarted States District Court en aeticle TD court ith erimeval Junsdlienon fer HHe IF ervmes, bat a mere adawisteative aihunal withowk any Cemined jurisclicten ? IG. Ds rt true that /tokin’ » UNCED STATES 303US 201, The 5 ome suet Stated an article IT court fs denoted Prom otter district cheeks y the syatex of its spelling ? (LD rt true He defenclant has no signed contracts with Te NITED STATES 0l Ar ERTCA ?We 4S UF HVUL the UNE/EU YHIES OF MHIERL CA Cana wot Claw Kromalous juridicton becouse te etefendaat (S achity Taris Saprous ? (RTS ct drue theck Supreme cutherity IS vested in the Sovererjn ? 26. Ti oh true soveretonty IS vested in the individual people of zach individual fountey on State ? ALTE + true that the UMLTEO STATES oP AMENTCA jllegally reeks @ Gictin of & Sovereign man to try and gain junsdichor ? 22. Ts rh true tHe UNITED STATES oF AMERTCA HWegaly Lilies +h narrhine Flags in the courtrooms clenoted by their gold Frnge avd tasselS, ds rely their jusselictien over all maritiert and clmscelty cases. 23.0: 4 true he Jaw of the land Is Comran lan 7 / a4. Ts rt trac He dedendlant Can ndtobtan a air trial dae ts yeing rated by meritine ew and not Common law, ako re Aeberiderst § iceuser [8 & Fictin whe the tefewdant can never gucstio7 oR Cross fxm We ? 7 As. Ds it not true the UMETED STATES OF AMERLCA IS & Crimes paanizechén controlled by the latanabional bankers theca gh Meir Wegal Fiat money system! Io. Ist true th this Cw&e 13 allowed fo proceed, tke Fudge cold have Comme Hed 4 Crimimal act by alowins jacsdictrrs over te defendant where no jorscictin exits e ; MOTZ0N FOR A PRELLaINARY HPAL Counsel Daaiel Riley tor tHe Defendant makes @ mofren mre prbovany HearingIN GfLON JO RECUSE Counsel Denied Riley makes ris rotting tp the dourt forthe 2 llowing reasoas pct te This case 1S TLS leted and faa! Burbadero 7§ Krowa dor hid teree delerse of He DOS doth as 4 Seolge eve proseenton. The lefendaat can not get « fiir impartial ruling witF Past Dev badoco aehincl The bench is tte dedendants hehe F, 2 Paul Barbalors has a hisdrey of debendrag pedophiles white t dedense afhrney ,radeis po tle cletentlant § behet taal Bark - roloro fs mea feally IN cupeble oF being pair prpartisd Sanist but astead biased dor the URLTED STRTES of RrERECA hecuuse th y ave petlep hile olkgarreas Hey tan britey Po hg bk it Barhackre hoes now cafe sy Their fever. _— 3. le detendant has reason fo belive ful Bacbiolore 1% biased always dora what He proseraters pels bey luc do his recor! of s dae pstead ef weghrigg the Foods and tedfeains # She. arg ucnect € hofs sites Denard _ HAVE BI [107EONS AMSwKeED TAL Counsel Dance Riley Banca orton de be Suprees) Demaiics every Srigle. 7 OAswer el es werthing te Uphetel He delineate ght to Appeo|, Fle cletendaat weil ro accept ang verbal aloo and wilh beep re Phas neFrons uptil tay ALC ANS 6 Oo n weitrng, Mle coaasc/ Lar tle delonrcla nt makes 7's OPINP 19 Keep @ clear Pee recorol of she pladmgs.YUVECED HATES VLIYLEY Comps far THE DVOTRTcr oF pow than pshire ANFIED STATES OP AMER A (Copute biter v. DANTEL RELEY Cuter mode by USA) ; Con NaN Daniel Riley acdtrig’2 sovereign capacity Gaunis Mprisas ) te Fichew YANTEL RILEY, idle dias Douaiey temand, far AtL D seoverable Material entities by law to rhe tlendayt, (actading any Banpy or Roswio material. DEMAND PoR_EVEDENLE Henin The Defenolant demands aw eviclence hearing abter chicosery ) Detovery Seruny CHEF 1.07 -cr-f94-01-06 The deteadant Yemands + Depose; all C3) of the co-conspiraters, the US Parshall SemeslLast-nere seven) ho (tt0,¢Hed the oleberclout of /2/02, pall Prakishals involved) 10 The atenpted Prardler ot 140 clekeuclent 0” - » discovery = PH/ shaler, Manes okhese pearshals will be gina fo fe lout afte discovery 7 dank on Ie fer. /, ; - Lention of Coe defen rarshals whe pertivipeted In [Pe appre ES a fof forpicomonies Tle Q) FRT agente who mrtecroge ted 1% ae Brown's newghh mented ors bfrfor that Yur he defendant Aerranits Je phis cicdlence to be beiey MARK CMM, LUKE LU, EA lor ga the west side of The Top of his doiveway pome usknoun Who coe Lots were heard, Ek Brown ancl Eleive Brown, lourt fo set teeves ane dates aad the place for a oitected, $0 tte defendant can pecpare & Prope dehewse MOTE: The Supreme Court has stated peoph acting as their oval counsel must have ther pladiags lebecally conspreedDATED: 1b/11 Jo? pt By Danie Rdey 2) uNTTEp WATES DSTA rer Court For NEW HAMPSHT RE Robert Kinsella, AusA Hachecl Heredo : Rhibt 1 USA Aterwey mevua] Rhibit 2. NEW Heanpshire 458-123:1 Metter from Secretary of State Khibit 3. Jefer From New tempshive Deputy Secretany of State uhbit 4, letter From USA Seneder Sununu's Liaise n ore: These exhibits are For proof the Uarrey STATE Ls pot wither jt jroisdie tn3 an 6 Tl arin bits gov eatig seamaster OF 64% hem & 15 Auomeys> USAM > Jitle? > Criminal Resouice Mansa! R- by oe pales 664 Territorial Jurisdiction (ofthe sever categorized in 18 US. § 7, Sestien 7[)i he most sigan, and provide: “Theta “special mart an terol juristcin ofthe Unite Sates "as uted in thi ti, inca (2) Any ands reservdor ugar fer the we ofthe Usted Sates, ad under the exclusive of concretion hemaf. or any plceparhased or chews ecqured ty te United Stats by consent of Be lngisanae of he Sate in whic he ane salle, othe erection ofa fry, gene, and cocker, oF er need bing ‘As isreally apparent this subsestion, nd privat second clase, bens sikiag semblance tothe 17h Clause of Atle L Se, fof he Contin, This cise ovis “The Congres shlThare power. To eure excute Lagilatin i al Case watever, ver ech Davis (not eucnding tn Mie agua) a my, be Cetin of parca Sus al he socepare of Congest, become te Seat ofthe Goveramen ofthe United Sates, andto exist ike Authority over ll locas ‘purchased by the Consent ofthe Lele of he Sein which the Same hal be, fr he Erecion of Fors, Magazine, Asenl, dock Yar, and cher neo Bunge (Eoophasi ade) The consitonl erase “econ login ie the equivalent of he sain aprtson Yelverton" Sue Jamar v Drove Contrasting SOzUrs 114, 11 (1557) oxime Surat Traine Ca». Cock, 261 US 67, 652(1930) ‘Unt e dost Cran, had been generally accepted tat whex the Une Ses acued propery sth he corset ofthe suc or any af he enumerted up, ‘acquired xcusve widistion by operation of wand any rtration ef auheriy by the sae, ee tha the ight tcrve civil an etimianl proces, was inoperable. See ‘Surplus Trading Co Cook 281 US. a 652.36. When Drav bel tht nate might sev leis ater pte igh ley eartain exes slong tha cl ot lntefee wih he Unked Stes governmental furtons, it became necessary for Congest anend 18US.C§ 73), by adn the word "ss" te estore cial {radon aver hae pics previously believed io be unde excluve Feder logue jrsction See HR. Rep Ne 023, 76h Cong, 4 Sse | (1940) 8 Rep Ne 1788, "ots Cong, Saas 1 (1940) ravo sso sted thatthe peas "he nef bling” was not be srl construed inclae only mili andnaal sts, but was tobe consried at “eabvacing whatever rctres ore fond W be acer inthe perfomance of he fencson of te Federal Governmest Ste Jamar» Davo Contracting Co. 302 US. at 1143 therefore property embraces courthouses, casts hoses, pest ces el oct nd urs Ce aviation purpose, “Te erctre limitation det 3% however, event the Usted Smite om hldng or smrire and havin juridicoe ver linac fe ehe valid pupae, ach 1s paisa iription oj snes Claus 17 spot the exclusive setod of obuining jursicion. Tue United Sues may ls Gai juadcton by reserving whee ‘overeign els wansered toe sate upon ts ety int te Unive or by cesion of ured afer the Unted Sues has otberwise acquired te pope. See Collin Fonemae Pare Ca, 304 U.S 318, 329-90 (958), James Dayo Contacing Co, 02 U.S at 92; Surpas Tradng Co. ¥. Coat, 81 US aCSSU4, Pat Lamsenvorh RRC, some, 1A US. 525, 526537, 38,599 (188), ‘Tae Unted Stes ay bolder soquite property wits the borders of «Hate wahout cquiing jurisdiction It may acute w land recesary forte performance fits ‘uncon ty purchase oremsneet amin witout the saie's conn. See KoM% Unaed Siar, 91 JS 367, 371,372 (1970 Bat # dees 20tereby Soqu lepieive Ieadion by vine of is properaip. The mogul of jution i depen the onset fot comic furan byte ate. Se hon Caw Tax Comision 3028. 97 (927, lamar © Drove Contacting Ca, 302 US. 11-2 Sat content the exercise of Federal jursdico way be evienced by aspeifeceactnest by gear] canstnusonl or tery provision. Cetin ofjureiin bythe ste ao requres ccepance byte Unites Sates. Se Adams v. United Sates, 319 US. 31 (19), Sarpes Trading Co. Caot, 281 US. H.63132, WRADE 180 e need States hs jursdition ea Foden gusto. So Maton Co. Tax Common, 302 US at 197 rio to Petru 1194, tvs resumed thatthe United Sate coed jection whenever ihe state offered it because the dnaton was deemed beef See Fort Lamenvorh £8. Cov Love, 114U..w 528 Ths presumption vas revered by emctnent ofthe Ac f Feary 1, 194, ceded at 40 US.C. §25%. Tis tate requires, ‘heed of aahrized ole ofthe agen) axguting or holding property He wide sae formal aecepanes of ach justo, exchs> ot paral ase my dene carb," and farther provides tha inthe sbemcy ofeach ling "tal be concosvely presmed thet ouch judicion bas bem cqured” See Adam Und Sa, 319 US 312 istic cor it wos juries 0 yrostoue solders ore commit o an army base pr fing of ecceancepeseibed by stants). The reairement of 40 USC. 6255 can slo be fll by uy fling sesting ste lw. Unced Sizes dohreon 954 F248, 984-85 24 Ci 1953) The eetnet of 40 USC. § 255 id 90 reinaciveyafetunaticton greiouysequred. See Matham v Unied Ser, 215 2 56 4h Cr) ce ened, MBS, 939 (1954), Untod Stes. Heard, 70F. Supp 198,200 (WD Mo, 1967). ‘COMMENT: I summary the United Sates may execs plenary iin jurdicion ve las within suiebordens: A. Wee trserved sich juieition wponenty f teat inte he win B, Where, rior toFetruny 1, 140, it acquired propety fr «purpose enunentedin be Coston withthe coset of the state, © Wet tacquirea propery wheter by purchase, itor eminent domain, and thereat, but por wo Petry 1,140, reeived a cesionofjisicen om the sated Were itacquird the rer, adler eeivedthe sas consent or cession ofjrsicton ater February 1, 140 and has fled the equi acceptace Ocober 1997 Criminal Resource Maman 664 Cxbvb ¢ im ofl 41672007 12:00 Pcede ted tte api eat e223. TITLE IX ACQUISITION OF LANDS BY UNITED STATES; FEDERAL AID CHAPTER 123 JURISDICTION OVER LANDS ACQUIRED; TAX EXEMPTION 123: Coded to United States — justin it ceded tothe United Stes of Amexca overall lands within this state aow or hereafter exclusively coed by the Und States ant wed as sites for post fees custom douse, military air bse, military insalations or ote pub uilings: povided, hat sn aceurate desertion an pln of the lands So owned and ocapie,venfied bythe oath f sons ofcer ofthe Vnted Sutesbaving knowledge oft ets, shall be Med with the seeretary of his ste, and, provided, furs, hat ti ceaion in upon the expres condloa tht the sate of New Hampshire sal ‘tin comsuren jusadton withthe United Stato in aad ove all suc lan, 30 frat al iv aah ‘sisi pocas suing ude the auderty ofthis tte nay be exacted om the eal and ad a ary balding pow or hereafireected heen inthe same way snd-wih the sme eff if hie te had tot been enacted, and that excusivejursiten sll evertto and reves in his ste whenever th ands shall eas tobe the propety ofthe Unie States Sure 1883, 1. PS J: PL 1. RE. RSA 13:1 1995, 254, eff. hune 23, 1955, Ge . New Hampsuire DEPARTMENT oF Srarp Wan, Gardner sree oft ubot P Antone Drpsy Soran of tate September 10,2001 To Tee Haas Thit ip cary dat we are ing i pty ot hetked oar records and do aot finds copy ofthe Vary uly yours, Fah Wiliam 2, Gardae Sexretiry of Sate Eahibit aBao nis New HampsHire DEPARTMENT OF STATE Robert P, Ambrose Senior Deputy Secretary of State David M. Scanlan Deputy Secretary of State M. Gardner ‘Secretary of State January 11, 2007 Mo To: Joe Haas aaa This is to certify thet we have checked our records and do not find 2 copy of the filing required by RSA 123:1. Very truly yours, David M. Scanlan Deputy Secretary of State Exhy bi? 2s State House Room 204, 107 N. Main St,, Concord, N.H. 03301 Phone: 603-271-3242 Fax: 603-271-6316 TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964 wwwarh.gov/eos qrail: elecHons@ror.clat- nh.usJOHN E. SUNUNU premise seer esa came © canner 0 ret House Sunes Canoea BANKING, HOUSING AND URBAN APFAERS COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSFCRTATION Nome nis ames UNITED STATES SENATE. “Masscamanmn, 03105 ox AND spoon 120 ‘ane eee 170 Map Sener rowrscosonic connarres ona ‘anino June 13, 2007 oe occas ‘oxyononen, Mr. Joseph Haas 2 su SE Oe ese PO Box 3842 ‘anata Concord, NH 03302 Dear Mr. Haas, Enclosed is a reply Senator Sununu received from the New Hampshire Department of State regarding his revent inquiry on your behalf In its response, the Department states, “we have checked our records and do not find a copy of the filing required by RSA 123:1.” In order to respond to your inquiry, I have forwarded your request to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts and have asked the Office respond directly to you. Please feel free to contact the Senater with any federal issues you may have in the future. ~ Sincerely, istiana Thornton Constituent/Community Liaison Exhibit F