The Canadian Jewish Congress, the CCLA, and the Limits of Expression argue that there can be no legitimate grounds for prohibiting non-violent ideas. In their own ways, both organizations provided much of the intellectual capital for a fundamental yet unresolved debate that all liberal democracies must grapple with. Whether free expression can justifiably be limited when the ideas promoted are deemed to be so offensive that they are inimical to the core of the free society.
The Canadian Jewish Congress, the CCLA, and the Limits of Expression argue that there can be no legitimate grounds for prohibiting non-violent ideas. In their own ways, both organizations provided much of the intellectual capital for a fundamental yet unresolved debate that all liberal democracies must grapple with. Whether free expression can justifiably be limited when the ideas promoted are deemed to be so offensive that they are inimical to the core of the free society.
The Canadian Jewish Congress, the CCLA, and the Limits of Expression argue that there can be no legitimate grounds for prohibiting non-violent ideas. In their own ways, both organizations provided much of the intellectual capital for a fundamental yet unresolved debate that all liberal democracies must grapple with. Whether free expression can justifiably be limited when the ideas promoted are deemed to be so offensive that they are inimical to the core of the free society.