Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
SEDUCTION
JEAN BAUDRILLARD
Brian Singer
Amin ghazaei
۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ
٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻋﻢ ﻓﻮﻛﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ،
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻻﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺣﺮﻳﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻁ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ :ﻓﺮﺍﺳﻮﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﮊﺭﻓﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻥﺭﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﭘﻮﭺ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ،
ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ "ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ" ﺑﺮﺍﻱ " ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺷﺪﻥ" ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻫﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻫﺮ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺪﺍ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺗﺮﻭﻣﭙﻪ ﻟﻮﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ،
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻭﺭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺍﺗﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮊﺭﻓﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ،ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ
ﻭ ﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺮﻋﻮﺏ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻋﺮﺻﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀﺎ ،ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻫﺮ ﺑﻠﻨﺪﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯﻱ
ﺍﻳﻜﺎﺭﻭﺳﻲ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺧﻄﻲ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺯﺩ .ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎً ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﺯﻩﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﺧﺘﻢ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ
ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ -ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻥ -ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ -ﺧﺪﺍ -ﻣﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺴﺘﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﮔﻲ )ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺟﻢ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ
ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺳﻘﻮﻁﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ
۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺪﺍ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺶ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺗﺨﻄﻲﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺩﻟﻮﺯ ﻣﻲﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺁﺷﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻫﺮﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺟﻲ ﺑﻴﻜﺮﺍﻥ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺗﺨﻄﻲ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﺷﺎﻥ
ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺨﻄﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﺨﻄﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ
ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻥ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻓﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺷﻤﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻱ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﺎﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ .ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻭ
۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻗﺮﻋﻪﻛﺸﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻻﺗﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪﺍﻱ
ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﮔﺮ ﻧﻮﺳﺘﺎﻟﻮﮊﻳﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺎ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻣﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻥ ،ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺳﺎﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ
ﺷﻮﻧﺪﻩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﻫﺮ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺷﻔﺎﻑﻧﻤﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺸﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﻮﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻳﺖﺍﺵ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺖ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺳﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺑﺰﻙ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺯﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺯﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻳﺖﺍﺵ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺬﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺗﻠﺴﻜﻮﭖﻫﺎ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻮﻥ
۱۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﺨﺰﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺠﺎﻡ .ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺸﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﻋﺮﺻﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ،ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻓﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻗﻴﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﻟﻤﭗ ﻭ ﺗﻴﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﻜﺴﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻳﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﻬﺰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺳﻼﺣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻂ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻏﻨﻴﻤﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺳﻮء ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﻮﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺩﻫﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﻮﻧﺪﻩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﮔﺮﻡ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺗﻲ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ
ﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﻴﻨﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻡ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻲ
ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻛﻬﺸﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﺭ
۱۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻱﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺖﺑﺎﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﻣﺎ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺟﺰ
ﻣﺮﮒ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺟﺰ ﭘﻮﭼﻲ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻣﺜﻠﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮﺷﺪﻩ
ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥﻛﻪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ
ﮔﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ،
ﻣﺮﮒ ﺳﻮﮊﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻛﺸﻬﻜﺸﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ )ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ( ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﻮﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻻﺯﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻣﻬﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﺗﻤﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺁﻗﺎﻱ ﻋﻠﻲﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﺤﻮﻻﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻫﺎﻡ ﺷﻬﺮﺟﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻗﻀﺎﻳﻲ
۱۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ
ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﺰﺩ ﺩﻳﻦ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﺏ ﻧﻴﺮﻧﮓ ،ﭼﻪ
ﻋﺸﻖ ،ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺰﻭﻳﺮ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ.
ﻟﻌﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻭ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ«
ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﺷﺮﺍﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ
ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﺣﻴﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺩ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ،
ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺮ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ
ﻗﺮﻥ ﻫﺠﺪﻫﻢ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﻓﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻝﻣﺸﻐﻮﻟﻴﺎﺕ
ﻣﺤﻴﻂﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺑﻮﺭﮊﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻝﻣﺸﻐﻮﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ) .ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻬﺎﻱ
ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ -ﻫﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ
۱۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ( .ﻋﺼﺮ ﺑﻮﺭﮊﻭﺍﺯﻱ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻭﻗﻒ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ،
ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺻﺮﻳﺤﺎً ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﮔﺸﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭﻛﻪ ﻓﻮﻛﻮ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ )ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ،ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ( ﺑﺮ
ﻣﻲﺧﻴﺰﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ،ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻧﻴﻚﺭﻭﺡ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻳﻢ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ،ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎ ،ﭼﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ،ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻣﻲﺟﻮﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻧﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ )ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺵ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ( ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲﺷﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻜﺸﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﻴﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ
ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻱ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻈﻢ
ﺧﺪﺍﻱﮔﻮﻧﻪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻴﺸﻲﻫﺎ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺰﻭﻳﺮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ؛ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ،ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺗﻮﻃﺌﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ .ﻫﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ
ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻓﺮﻭﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
۱٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﻀﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ،ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ
ﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺮﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ
ﻧﻔﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺍﻗﻊ ،ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﺲ ﺯﻥ ﺳﺮﻭﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺩ )ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ( ،ﺧﺸﻦﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻤﻨﺪﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﺣﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ،ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ
ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺧﺮﺩ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺷﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﺑﺎ ﺯﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ
ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻼﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻧﺮﻡ ،ﻣﻮﻧﺚﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﺗﻴﺰﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻳﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ
۱٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻓﺼﻞ ﻳﻜﻢ
ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
۱٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﺪ ،ﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ
ﺣﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﻟﺬﺕ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﺴﺮﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ
ﺍﻱ ،ﻧﻪ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺘﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻲ :ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻫﺪﻑ )ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ( ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻓﺴﺦ ﺷﺒﺢ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪﻱ .ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻬﺎ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺧﻴﺎﻝﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﺶ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
۱۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺒﺢ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺸﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
)ﺑﺎﺭﺕ(
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻠﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﮕﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﺘﻤﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﻲ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻋﺮﻭﺝ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ،
ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﻔﺖ) :ﻓﻘﻂ( ﻳﻚ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﻳﻚ ﻟﻴﺒﻴﺪﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ،
ﻧﺎﻡ ﭘﺪﺭ ،ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﭼﻴﺰﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺑﻲﻧﺸﺎﻥ،
ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻓﺎﻟﻮﺳﻲ ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﺨﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﭘﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
۱۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺻﻔﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ۱ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ :ﭼﻨﺪ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺭﻭﺗﻴﻚ ،ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻉ،
ﺩﻳﻔﺮﺍﻛﺴﻴﻮﻧﻬﺎ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﻟﻴﺒﻴﺪﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺮﺣﺪﺍﺕ ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻥ
ﭘﺎﺭﺍﺩﺍﻳﻢ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺧﻨﺜﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ.
ﺧﻄﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺍﻭﻡ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺘﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺘﺶ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺳﺘﻢ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺑﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺩﻳﺪﻩﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ) .ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﻴﻠﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ( .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﺑﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﮔﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻗﺒﻮﻻﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ )ﺗﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ؟ ﺍﮔﺮ
۱۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺟﻨﺲ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ( ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ﻧﮕﻮﻥﺑﺨﺘﻲ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺷﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻭﺗﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﺯﻥ /ﻣﺮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺘﺎً ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ِ ﻋﻤﺪﻱ ،ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
***
ﺑﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﻲ ﺑﺮﺩ ،ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﺍﺕ )ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ( ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺤﻮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺮﺩ )ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ( .ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻭﺗﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ.
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲ
ﻛﻨﺪ.
۲۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻧﻘﺎﺏ »ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭﻱ« ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﻟﺬﺕ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺪﻥ ،ﻳﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﺍً ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ( ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﺟﻨﺲ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻳﻜﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻞ
ﺳﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ -ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ )ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ،ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭﻟﺬﺗﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭ،
ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺹ ،ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺪﻥ ،ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺟﺰﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺑﻨﺪﻩﻭﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻓﺤﺸﺎ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﻓﻬﻤﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ
۲۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻴﻜﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ) ،(powerﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ
ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺳﺒﻌﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻓﻤﻴﻨﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺮ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ )ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ( ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ )ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ(
ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ »ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ« ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ .ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ »ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ« ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻕ ﻣﻴﻞ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ »ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ« ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ،...
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ...ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﻲ
ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ.
***
ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ :ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﻓﻤﻴﻨﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ )ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺳﻲ ﻣﻤﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ
۲۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
"ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺯﻥ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻓﻌﻠﻴﺖ ﻛﻠﻴﺘﻮﺭﺍﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ
ﻣﻬﺒﻠﻲ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻬﺒﻞ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﺶ
ﻛﻠﻴﺘﻮﺭﻳﺴﻲ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺳﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺪﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻟﻤﺲ ﻓﺮﺝ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻟﺒﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ،ﺗﻜﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻛﻔﻞ
ﻣﻬﺒﻞ ،ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺯﻫﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ".
)ﻟﻮﺳﻲ ﺍﻳﺮﻳﮕﺎﺭﻱ(
ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ؟ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﻥ ،ﺍﺭﻭﺗﻴﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ،ﭼﻨﺪ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺘﻲ
ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﻔﻬﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ :ﺁﻭﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﻱ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻪﺍﺵ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻣﺎ ،ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻧﺎﮔﺮﺍﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻠﻤﺮ ۲ﺗﺎ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﻟﻮﺯ .۳ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻴﻜﻲ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻱ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻪ
ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ
ﺑﺪﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻩﺍﺳﺖ) ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﺪﻥ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ؟( ﻳﺎ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺪﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻣﺎ
ﻗﻄﻌﺎً ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎً
۲۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺟﺎ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻨﻊ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ )ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ( ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲ
ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻮﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﺶ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺯﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺎً ﺟﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺐﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻟﻮﺣﺎﻧﻪﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲﺗﺮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲ
ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺄﻳﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﺴﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ،ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻲ ،ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ..ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ) ،ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ( ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺟﺰ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؟ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻼﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ
۲٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺯﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ » ﻣﻮﻫﻦ« ،ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﻮ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ.
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻛﻼً ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ
ﺳﻄﺢ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺑﻲﻗﻴﺪﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ .ﮊﺍﻥ
ﺭﻳﻮﺭ ۴ﺩﺭ »ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻓﻜﺎﻫﻲ« ،ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ:
»ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻧﻲ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻬﺎ ﻭﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺯ ﺷﮕﻔﺖﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻟﻬﺎﻳﺶ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﻱ
ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺷﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﻟﻬﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻻﻳﻨﺤﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ )ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ( ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﮔﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺮﮔﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ.
۲٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻗﻄﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺘﺰﻟﺰﻝ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ) .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ
ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( ﻗﻄﺐ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﻭﺗﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ ﺳﺎﻻﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺘﻮﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ :ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﭘﻮﺷﻲ ،Transvestism ۵ﻧﻪ
ﻫﻤﻮﺳﻜﺴﻮﺍﻟﻬﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺮﻧﺴﺴﻜﺴﻮﺍﻟﻬﺎ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﭘﻮﺷﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﻳﻠﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻮﺳﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﻣﺮﺳﻮﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﺬﻛﺮ ﺭﺍ
۲٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻧﺚ ﺭﺍ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻳﻚ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﺟﺪﺍ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻊ ﺳﻮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺗﺮﻧﺴﻮﺳﺘﻴﺴﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻣﻲﻭﺭﺯﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻟﻨﺪ ۶ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺷﺎﻥ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺪﺍﻥ
ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﺕﺁﻣﻴﺰ ،ﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻧﻴﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ
»ﻧﻴﻜﻮ« ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺵ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻭﺍﻻﺗﺮ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ) .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﻛﻪ( ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ :ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻏﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺯﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻠﻜﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻥ /ﻏﻴﺮ ﺯﻥ ،ﺗﺎ ﺯﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﺶ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺁﺳﺎﻧﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺯﻥ /ﺯﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻲﻧﻘﺼﻲ
ﺑﻜﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺷﻮﺩ
ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ
۲۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
)ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ( ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺷﮕﻔﺖﺁﻭﺭﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ )ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺮﻧﺴﻮﺳﺘﻴﺴﻢ( ،ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻞ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ.
ﺁﻥ ﺟﺴﺖ .ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻛﻬﻨﻪ ﻧﺎﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﻡ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻼﺋﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﺍﺽ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ
ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﮕﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
parody ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﭘﻮﺷﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪ )ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻫﺠﻮﺁﻣﻴﺰ(
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻫﺠﻮﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻬﺎﻳﺶ .ﻓﺤﺸﺎﻱ ﺗﺮﻧﺴﻮﺳﺘﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎًﻻً ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ
۲۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﭙﻴﮕﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺤﺸﺎﻱ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺠﻮﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺳﻜﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻏﺎﻳﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻭ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺭﻭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ -
ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ(
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻫﺠﻮﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖ ﻛﻴﻨﻪﺗﻮﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
ﺯﻥ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﺗﺠﻬﻴﺰﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﻳﺐﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﺮﻧﺴﻮﺳﺘﻴﺴﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻓﺰﻭﻧﮕﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻬﺎ )ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻧﺴﻮﺳﺘﻴﺴﻢ( ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺑﺎﻃﻞﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺳﺘﻬﺰﺍء ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺁﻭﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ
ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻫﺠﻮﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ
ﺧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻗﺎﻃﻊ ) (acerbicﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﭘﺎﺭﻭﺩﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺰﻟﺖ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﻡ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﻏﺮﺍﻕﺁﻣﻴﺰ ،ﺳﺨﻴﻒ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ( ﺩﻋﻮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺟﺰ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻳﺒﺪ .ﻓﺮﺍ -ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺟﺰ ﻣﺪﻝ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ) .ﺗﺮﻧﺴﻮﺳﺘﻴﺴﻢ( ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ
۲۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ /ﺯﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ /ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ .ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺟﻌﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﺣﺪﺍﺕ ﺗﺼﻨﻊ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ) ،ﻧﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ،ﻧﻪ
ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻪ ﻟﺬﺗﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻟﻴﺒﻴﺪﻭﻳﻲ ﺗﺨﺼﻴﺺ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ( ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ
ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻋﻮﻱﺍﺵ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻲ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﮕﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﻤﻴﻨﻴﺴﺘﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻴﻜﻲ ،ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺭﻭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺿﻤﺤﻼﻝ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻋﺰﻡ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ
ﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﻻﻳﻨﺤﻞ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖﻫﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ) (Makeupﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ :ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ،
ﺭﺍﻩﺣﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﺨﻄﻲ ،ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ِ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪﻱ ﻛﻨﺸﻬﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ :ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﺯﻥ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺎﺣﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺰﻙ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺑﺮﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻱ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻭ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ
۳۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ) .ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ )ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ( ﺑﺮﺭﻭﻱ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ )ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ(ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺯﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ،ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺭﻓﻊ
ﻧﻮﺍﻗﺺ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻻﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ( ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺯﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ :ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭﺵ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻜﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻲ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ .ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ )ﻣﺨﺼﻮﺹ ﺯﻥ( ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻥ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ )ﻧﻴﺰ( ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺯﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﺰﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺯﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺖ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻐﻮ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻟﻐﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﻛﻞ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﭘﺪﺭﺷﺎﻫﻲ ،ﺍﺯ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ
ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﺍﺑﻠﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ،ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺍﺑﮋﮔﻲ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺒﻮﻻﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻧﺎﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻧﺪﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ) ،ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎ
۳۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ( ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺪﻓﻬﻤﻲ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻛﺮﺩﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ،ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻼﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ( ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺭﺏ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺭﺍﺯﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻨﻪ ﺟﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ،ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﭘﺲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﻓﺮﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻜﺎﻣﺎﺕ ،ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺰﻭﻳﺮﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻜﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺳﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺳﺘﺤﻜﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﺎﻓﻮﻕ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ) .ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ( ﺩﺭ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻴﺠﻲ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺍﺱ ﭘﺮﺗﻲ
)ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺮﺩﺑﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ( ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻭﺍﻧﺲ )ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( .ﭘﺲ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﭼﻪ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻣﻀﺤﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﮔﻲ
۳۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ،ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﻧﻤﺎ ،ﭘﺎﺭﺍﻧﻮﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻃﺎﻗﺖ ﻓﺮﺳﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ
ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ )ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﮕﻲ(
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺘﻠﻬﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ"ﺟﺮﺍﺣﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ" ۹ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﻨﺸﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺎﻓﻮﻕ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺁﻟﺖ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﻠﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺣﺴﺎﺩﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻟﻘﺎﺡ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎ ,ﺑﺎ
ﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ
ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ :ﺗﻴﻎ ﺯﻧﻲ ،ﻗﻄﻊ ﻋﻀﻮ )ﺁﻟﺖ(،
ﺩﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺼﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﻧﺪ( ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ,ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﻭﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻱ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻌﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﻭﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺳﺘﻢ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ
۳۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺑﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ
ﺟﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﭼﺮﻧﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﻭﻧﻪ
ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺣﻞ ﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ
ﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺣﻞ ﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ » ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺎﺕ «
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ،
)ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﺳﺘﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻳﻜﺎﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ( ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ,ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﻓﺮﻡ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﻡ ﺧﻄﻲ
ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺮﻡ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﻡ ﻣﺴﻠﻄﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺭﺍﺯﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﭼﺮﺑﺶ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻓﺮﻡ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﺶ ،ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺐ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ،ﺑﻪ
ﻃﻮﺭ ﺭﺍﺯﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻏﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ) .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ( ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ )ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ( ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺳﻮﻡ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ )ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ( ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
***
۳٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ ،ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎﺕ ﺳﺘﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻲﻋﺪﺍﻟﺘﻲ
ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﻧﮋﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺤﺮﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻟﺬﺕ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺣﻘﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ :ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮﻱ ،ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻡ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻲﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ
ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ ،ﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺠﺎﻫﻞ )ﺍﺯ
ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ( ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻲ ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﻧﺎﻣﻴﺪﻩﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ،ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻬﻴﺞﺗﺮ ﻭ
ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ » ﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺣﻮﺍﺱ«۱۱ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻫﺪﻑ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺭﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﭼﺮﺑﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺲ ﮔﻴﺞ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻮﺱﻫﺎ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻪ
ﻣﻴﻞ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩ ﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻟﺬﺕ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻏﺎﺭﺕ
ﺷﺪﺷﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻜﻮﺕ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺯﺩ؟ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻕ ﺑﻲﺣﺴﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻲﺷﺎﻥ ،ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ
۳٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ؟ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﮕﻲ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺠﺮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ،ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﺖ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺭﺍﻩ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ؟ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﺣﻴﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺟﻨﮓ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ )ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﮓ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﻴﺮﻧﺪ( ﻭ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭘﻨﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺴﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ -ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﮕﺮﻱﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
)ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ( ﺭﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭﻳﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﻴﻤﺸﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﻢ .ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺬﺕ
۱۲
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ :ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺟﻮﻳﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ )ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ( ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
ﻛﻴﺮﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ( .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﻨﺸﻲ ،ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ،ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻭ
۳٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺸﺮ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
ﻓﺮﻭ ﺭﻭﺩ.
***
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ، pill ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻗﺮﺻﻬﺎﻱ ﺿﺪ ﺣﺎﻣﻠﮕﻲ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﻖ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺷﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ .ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ) .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺒﺎﺡ
ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ »ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖﺭﻓﺘﻪ«( ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﻣﻲﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵﻫﺎﻱ »ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ« ﻗﺮﺻﻬﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﻠﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﻪ ،ﭘﺰﺷﻜﻲ ،ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻨﺶ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻏﺎﺭﺗﮕﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺭﻫﺎﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻟﺬﺕ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ .ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﻃﻠﺒﻲ،
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﻃﻠﺒﻲ »ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ« ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻘﺪﻭﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ :ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻖﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻌﻮﻅ
ﺍﺑﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﺍﺗﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ) .ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ(.
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺯﻥ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻉ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺸﺶ ،ﻭﻱ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻲ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺵ
ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ،ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﭙﻨﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻫﺎﻧﺖ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻫﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ
۳۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺭﺍﺣﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ )ﺟﻨﺴﻲ( ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﻟﻮﺣﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﻟﻮﺣﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺶ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﻴﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ،
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮﺍﻧﻪ) .ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺁﻥ،
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ(.
ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺮﻫﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺨﻔﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺑﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻴﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻟﺤﻈﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ،ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻚ ﺧﺎﻝﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺒﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺻﻼً .ﺑﺮ ﻋﻜﺲ ﺣﺎﻻﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ -
***
ﺣﻜﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﻭﺭ
ﻫﺮ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ ،ﻫﺮ ﻳﺎﻭﻩﺍﻱ ،ﻫﺮ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﻴﭽﺪ .ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ,ﺣﻖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
۳۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ )ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ،ﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ( ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ :ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ،ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ .ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻔﺮﻁ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻭ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﺮﺯﻩﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺑﺴﻂ ،ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ،ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﺮﺯﻩ
ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻏﺮﺍﻕﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺗﺮﻭﻳﺞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ
ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺍﻗﻴﻠﻢ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ« ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ "ﻃﻌﻨﻪ ﺍﺑﺪﻱ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ" )ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ( ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﮕﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺭﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﭼﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
***
ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻛﻴﻨﻪﺗﻮﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ) .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ( ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ،ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻗﺎﻋﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺟﻼﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ :ﺷﻜﻨﺠﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﻲ ،ﺍﺭﺗﻜﺎﺏ ﻫﺮ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ،ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺳﺮﺩ) .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﺣﻖ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ
۳۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻋﺼﺎﺭﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ )ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﻋﺼﺎﺭﻩ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ )ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ((،
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻓﻦ ﺍﻭﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺪﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻨﻲ ،ﺁﻣﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻳﺤﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﻍ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﮕﺮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ )ﻛﻼً( ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ
)ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺗﺴﻠﻄﺶ ،ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ،ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻭ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ .ﺳﺎﻟﻮ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻱ ،ﺍﺯﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ) .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ِ ﻟﻮﺍﻁﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ )ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ( ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻭﺭﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ:
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮﺍﺱ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ
ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ
***
٤۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻞ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻭ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻼ ﻭ
ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻳﻒ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺎ (.ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﻭ ﭘﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻡ ﻣﻨﻔﻲﺍﺵ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺗﺶ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ :ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﻨﺶ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ،
ﺳﺮﺧﺎﺏ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺮﺍﻕ ﺩﻭﺯﻱ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ) ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ( ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻋﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ )ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﺴﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﻧﺰﺍﻛﺖ( ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ
ﺷﻘﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﭘﺎ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻴﺪﻫﺪ :ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ
ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺒﺨﺸﻴﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻟﺬﺗﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺑﺎﻳﻢ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷﺖ
٤۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ
ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ :se ducere) ،ﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ،ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ( ﻛﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ،ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻮﺱ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺴﻠﻲ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﺴﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﺴﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ،ﻗﻄﻌﻴﺖ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﭙﻨﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻭﺍﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ،ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﻟﻴﺒﺪﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﻧﮓ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻨﮕﺮﻳﻢ ،ﻋﺸﻖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻋﺸﻖ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻏﻨﻴﻤﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻋﺸﻖ .ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ) .ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻬﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ (.ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ :ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻲﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻂ ﻣﻘﺴﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭﺭﺯﻳﺪﻥ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺸﻖ
٤۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻭﺭﺯﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ )ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ( ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺮﮔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ..ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﺳﻜﺲ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ؟ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻴﻞ.
"ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻄﺮﻱ ﺑﻲﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺯﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﻴﻠﺶ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺩ
ﺟﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻱ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﻧﺸﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺄﺧﻴﺮﻱ ،ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻭ
ﻣﺪﺗﺶ ،ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺯﻥ ،ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻜﻨﺪ .ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺭﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻏﻮﺷﻲ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﻣﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ) .ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺯﻥ ،ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ
ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺧﺪﺍﻱﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ( ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺯﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻥ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺳﺒﺐ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺩﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎًﻟﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ...ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻣﻴﻠﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﻧﺪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﭘﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺑﻲﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ“ .
۱۷
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻴﺲ ﺭﻭﺯﺗﺎﻧﮓ -ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﺷﻮﻡ – ﺹ ۱۰۵ - ۱۰۴
ﻭ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺠﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺻﻼً ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺯﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻲ ﺑﺎ »
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ« ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ؟ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ،
ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﻋﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ؟ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
٤۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﮓ ﺣﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻧﻔﻬﺘﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ) .ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭﻱ( ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ.
"ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻣﻲﻭﺭﺯﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻣﻲﻭﺭﺯﻧﺪ )ﻭﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﺍﻓﺴﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﺍﻥ ،ﺳﮕﻬﺎ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎ(
»ﻧﻪ« ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ .ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﮔﻮ ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻱ ﭘﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩﺍﺵ ،ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺣﻘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾ
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻗﻪ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎ » ﻧﻪ« ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﭽﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺣﺘﻤﺎً ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺯﻥ ﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻟﺰﺑﻴﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﺘﻤﺎً ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺩﻭﺭ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺷﺒﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻳﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻂ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ ،ﭘﺲ
ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺑﻮﻫﺎ،
ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﭼﺸﻢ ﭘﻮﺷﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ«.
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻨﺲ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻧﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺷﺒﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ )!(...
ﺑﺪﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻟﺒﻲ ﺣﺼﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾﻫﺎﻱ
ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻮﻟﻮﮊﻳﻜﻲ ...ﺑﻪ ﺳﺘﻮﻩ ﺍﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﻧﺚ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺬﻛﺮ ،ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻟﻎ ﻭ ﺑﭽﻪ ،ﻟﺰﺑﻴﻦﻫﺎ،
ﮔﻲﻫﺎ،ﻫﻢ ﻓﺎﻋﻞ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻔﻌﻮﻝ ﺁﻥ ،ﻫﻢ ﻟﻮﺍﻁ ﮔﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻟﻮﺍﻁ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻨﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ
ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻫﻤﺠﻨﺲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ)ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ( ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﮔﺮﺟﻨﺲﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻟﺴﻴﻦ ﻭ
ﮔﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻞ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺮﻗﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻟﻤﺎﻥ
ﻧﺎﺑﺨﺮﺩﻳﻢ".
ﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺑﺎﻟﻨﺪﻭﻧﺎ ﺑﺎﺭﺑﺎﺭﺍ ﭘﻨﺘﻮﻥ .ﺟﻮﻻﻱ (۱۳)۱۸۱۹۷۸
ﺷﻮﺭﻳﺪﮔﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ،ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ ﻭﻟﺬﺕ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﻧﭽﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺗﺎﻧﮓ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ :ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻣﻮﺯﻧﺪ
٤٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﺍﻗﻠﻴﻢ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻚ ﺭﻣﺰﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ
ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ؟
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺘﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻟﺬﺗﻲ
ﺑﺪﺍﻫﺘﺎ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﻣﺰﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﺎﺕ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ »ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ« ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ» ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ« ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺬﺕﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻬﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﻭﻣﻲﭘﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﻴﻜﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ
ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺑﻲﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺷﺪﻩ
ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ.
ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﻫﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ:
٤٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﻟﻬﻪ ﻋﺸﻖ )ﺍﺭﺱ( ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻛﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
)ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ،ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﺳﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ
ﺧﺎﺹ) ،ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺁﻧﺰﻣﺎﻥ( ،ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﺗﺠﻠﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺭﻭﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ،ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺧﺼﻴﺼﻪ
ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻬﺎﻣﺶ
ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺮﻓﻴﻊ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺘﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ .ﺟﻨﺒﺶ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻬﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﮓ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﻭﺵ
ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻋﺎﻗﺒﺖ ﻣﺼﻴﺒﺖ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ
ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ،ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻲ ﻗﺎﻃﻊ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﻴﺰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﺍﺭﺕ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻔﺶ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﻭﺣﺸﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﮔﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ
٤٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺯﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﻫﺮﺯﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺟﻨﺲ ﻣﻮﻧﺚ( .ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺯﻥ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺿﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﺎ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﻠﺶ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﻭﺳﭙﻴﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﺮﺿﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ -ﭼﻪ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻟﻌﻲ ﺧﻴﺮﻩﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ
ﺑﻠﻌﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﺮﺯﻩﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﭼﺮﺧﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻌﻮﻅﻫﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ) :ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ
ﻛﻢ ﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﮔﺬﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ( :۱۹ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ،
ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻣﺎً ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ،ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ،ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﻭ
ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺻﻔﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ،ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ
ﺗﻨﺎﻭﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻟﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ .ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻤﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﺗﻮﭘﻴﺎﻳﻲ )ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻤﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ -
ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ:
ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ،ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ،ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﻠﻮﺑﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻤﻴﻨﻴﺰﻩ
٤۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﻠﻐﻴﺎﺕ ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺭﺧﺘﺸﻮﻳﻲ
)ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﭘﻮﭺ( ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻄﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ،ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻬﻴﻴﺞ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﻧﻘﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﻤﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ:
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ -ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺩﻻﻟﺘﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺭﻑ -ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﻩ .ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺧﻨﺜﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺷﻜﺎﻓﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻴﻦ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺩﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ؟ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﺘﺮ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺳﻮﺩﮔﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻌﻮﻅﻭﺍﺭﮔﻲ ،ﻋﻤﻮﺩﻳﺖ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ،ﻭﺭﺍﻱ
ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻴﺖ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻟﺠﺎﻡ ﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ »ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭﻱ« ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
٤۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ،ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺭﺧﻮﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻼﺷﻲ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻮﺭﺍﻥ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻞ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
٤۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻳﻮ -ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮ
ﺟﻴﻤﻲ ﻛﻠﻴﻒ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻟﺰﻭﻣﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﻮﻩ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ )ﺑﺘﻮﺍﺭﮔﻲﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻭ (..ﺑﻜﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻳﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﺴﺪﻭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻼﻣﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﺭﻭﻙ )ﺑﺎﺭﻭﻙ( ﺑﺮ ﺩﻻﻟﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ »ﮔﺮﻭﺗﺴﻚ« )ﻫﻨﺮ
٥۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﺎﻏﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﮔﺮﻭﺗﺴﻚ ،ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻛﻮﻫﺴﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ
ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻮﺯﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻗﺒﻼ ﻧﺪﻳﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﻧﻪ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻬﻮﺕﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻫﺮﺯﻩﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻬﻮﺕﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻬﻮﺕﺁﻣﻴﺰ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺎﻟﺒﺪﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﮔﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻥ ،ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﺤﺾﺍﺵ ،ﻭﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﺑﻞ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻜﺲ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ
ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ،
۲۱
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻫﺮﺯﮔﻲ ،ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﺮﺯﮔﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻋﻨﺼﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ،
ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﮕﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺨﻴﻼﺕ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺁﻣﻴﺰ ،ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺑﺎ
٥۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺑﮕﺮ ِ« ﻣﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻩ repressive) ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ» :ﺗﺼﻌﻴﺪﺯﺩﺍﻱ
( ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻩ :ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ desublimation
ﻃﺒﻖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺗﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺘﻤﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻱ
ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﻭ
ﺣﻘﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺿﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ( ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ) .ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻋﺎﻣﻪ ﺗﺴﺮﻱ
ﻧﻴﺎﺑﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ )ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ (lanouvelleﺑﺮ ﮔﻮﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺧﻴﺰﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻜﺲ ،ﻣﻜﺮﺭﺍً ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺑﺮﭼﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻫﻤﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺁﻥ )ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺁﻥ( ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﺒﺰ ﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﺮﻭﻓﻴﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ،ﺩﻗﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﮔﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺼﺎﺣﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ )ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺯﺩﺍﻳﺪ.
٥۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺣﺎﺩ ﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ،ﺳﻮﺭﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﮕﺮﺷﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺩﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱﺍﺵ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺭﻧﮓ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ .ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮ ،ﺭﻧﮕﻲﺗﺮ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻲﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪﻫﺎ )ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ!( ،ﺷﻤﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ )ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ( ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ :ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻜﺮﺭ
ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻛﻢﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺣﺬﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.
۲۲
ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﺁﻭﺭ ،ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻬﺠﻦ ،ﭘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻔﻘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﮔﻴﺞﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻓﻮﻧﻴﻜﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﮊﺍﭘﻨﻲ :ﺍﺗﺎﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻝ ،ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻣﻮﺯﻳﻚ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻲ ،ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﺬﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﭘﺨﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺘﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺤﻮ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ )ﺑﺎﺥ ﻣﻮﻧﺘﻮﺭﺩﻱ ،ﻣﻮﺗﺴﺎﺭﺕ(
ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺷﻨﻴﺪﻥ ،ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ،ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺜﻼً ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﺴﺮﺕ ﻳﺎ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺸﻨﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺯﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺤﻴﻄﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺩﺭﺍﻙﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺤﻈﻮﻅ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ
٥۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﮊﺍﭘﻨﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺑﻴﺎﻣﻴﺰﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺷﺶ ﻓﻮﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺯﻳﻚ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ
ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻣﺠﺬﻭﺏ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ )ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ( ﺷﻤﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ :ﻛﻤﺎﻝ
ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ»،ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ« )ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ( ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻋﻘﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻮﺭﻳﺘﺎﻧﻲ )ﻓﺮﻗﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻴﺖ( ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻜﺎﺣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ،ﻛﺴﻲ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﺍﻱ
ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭ )ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ( ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺐ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﮔﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺎﺭﻳﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺎﻃﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ) .ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺿﻮﺍﺑﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻞ»ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ« ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ )ﻡ(( ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻲ
٥٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺳﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻓﺰﻭﻧﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻲﺧﺎﺻﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ )ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ) .ﻡ((( ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻓﻮﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻳﻮ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺰﻟﺖ ﺣﻘﻴﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ.
ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ،ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻓﻮﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺳﻪ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻮﻫﻢ
ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻠﻢ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭﺳﻜﻮﭘﻲ ،ﻓﺰﻭﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭﺳﻜﻮﭘﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻬﻮﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ )ﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ
ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺋﻲ( ﻋﺎﺩﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻧﺮﻡﻧﺎﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺳﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺯ.
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺮﻡﻧﺎﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭﺳﻜﻮﭘﻲﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎً ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺗﻮﻫﻤﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ )ﻣﻴﻞ( ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺵ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻭﻗﻴﺤﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﺮ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻔﻜﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﺯﻧﺶ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺑﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻼﻳﻢ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺖ؟ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻗﺎﻃﻌﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻬﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ
ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ
٥٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺳﻜﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻭﻗﻴﺢﺍﻧﺪ .ﻓﺴﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻓﻮﺍﺣﺶ ﭘﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺳﻜﻮ ﻣﻲﻧﺸﻴﻨﻨﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺮﺍﻥ
ﮊﺍﭘﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻫﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺳﺘﻴﻦ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﺍﻱ )ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﻣﻪﭘﺴﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺩﻣﺎﻏﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺗﺨﻢ ﭼﺸﻤﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻣﻬﺒﻞ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺑﺒﺮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ؟( ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻛﻮﻝ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﻻ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻴﻦ
ﻓﻮﺍﺣﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﺪﻱ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﻼﻕﺯﻧﻲ،
ﺍﺳﺘﻤﻨﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ،ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﻭ ..ﺩﺭ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮓ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻟﻊ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ
ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻓﻮﺍﺣﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻠﻌﻴﺪﻧﺪ .ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ؟ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ,ﻣﻬﺒﻞﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﻳﺘﻲ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻟﺒﺨﻨﺪ ﺑﺰﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺑﺨﻨﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻟﻤﺲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻫﺮﺯﮔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺟﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻤﻞ ﺑﭽﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺠﺬﻭﺏ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻡ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﻴﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ .ﻓﺮﺍﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ،
)ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻳﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ( ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ
٥٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺗﺮ ،ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﻭﻧﻲﺗﺮ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ؟ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺳﻜﺲ،
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻥ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺸﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ
ﭘﻮﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺳﻜﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺁﻥ ﻟﺬﺗﻲ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺪ؟ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻣﺎ ،ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻖ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﻧﺶ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﻋﻴﺎﺷﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ،ﻋﻴﺎﺷﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﻣﻔﺮﻁ )ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﻧﺸﻲ ﻫﻢ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﻧﺸﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻱ ﮔﺰﻳﻦ ﻫﺮ ﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ( ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ
ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ .ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ .ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺻﺤﺒﺘﻬﺎ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﻋﻠﻨﻲ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ
ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻋﻴﺎﺷﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ
ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻬﺎ ﺳﺮﺧﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﻞ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺷﺪ ،ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
***
ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ :ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺟﺰ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ
ﻟﺒﺎﺱ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺍﺩ :ﻃﺮﺡ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ "ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮ" ۲۳ﻭ
٥۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﺷﺪﮔﻲﺷﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﺩ ﺟﻨﺴﻲﺍﻧﺪ .ﻃﺮﺡ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺳﻲ :ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﻃﺮﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻣﻬﺎ ،ﻓﺮﻭﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺗﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺍ -ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﺑﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﻞ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻣﺎ ،ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ » ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ « ﺑﺪﻥ،
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻳﻮ ﻓﻮﻧﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﻞﺍﺵ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺷﺮﺍﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
"ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺁﻥ،
ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺿﺮﺑﺎﻥ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﻣﻲﮔﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﺍﻱ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺧﻮﺩ -ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ -
ﭘﻴﺪﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻨﺰﻟﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ
ﻛﻨﺪ".
ﻫﮕﻞ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ
ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﻣﺮﺩ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺳﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻼﻑ ﭘﺎﺭﭼﻪ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﺍﺕ ﻣﻲﭘﻴﭽﻲ ،ﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ» :ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ «.ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﺭﻩ) ،ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ (.ﺑﺪﻥ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ،ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﺸﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ )ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ( ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﺷﺪﻥ
٥۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ) .ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻡ(( ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺣﺠﺎﺑﻲ
ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺪﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭘﻮﺷﺸﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻮﺷﺶﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺭﺍ
»ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ« )ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ( ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ .ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﻠﻲ » ﻧﻤﻮﺩ«ﻫﺎ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ) :ﺑﺪﻥ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( ﭘﺲ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭﻗﻴﺢ ،ﻫﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺪﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﻭﺗﻴﻜﻲ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻨﺮﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻥ ﻧﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺯﺷﺖﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ،ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ »ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺮﻱ« ﺳﻜﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﻤﻠﻬﺎ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺻﺪﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺪﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻭ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺗﻠﻘﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖِ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﻣﺎﻳﮕﻲ ﺍﺭﻋﺎﺑﮕﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ )ﻭ ﻣﻴﻠﺶ( ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﻫﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﻼﻙ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ» ،ﻧﻤﻮﺩ« ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺗﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ:
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻮﻳﻮ ،ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺰﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻫﺮﺯﻩ
٥۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻫﺮﺯﻩﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﺫﺍﺗﻲﺍﺵ ،ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪﻱ ،ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ
ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻥ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ .ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺗﻚ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ » ﺫﺍﺕ
ﺑﻮﺩﮔﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ« ﻳﺎ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻳﺎ ﺟﻤﺎﻉ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ،ﺍﺭﺯﺷﮕﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ
ﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﻜﻬﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻻﺕ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﻠﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺳﺘﺸﻮﻳﻲ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ» :ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮ
ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ
ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ؟«
***
ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺭﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡ
ﺭ ﺍ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻔﻈﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﺶ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ
ﺟﻌﻞﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺳﻜﺲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ ،ﺣﺪﻑ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺪﺩ ،ﺍﺑﮋﻩ
٦۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﻭ
ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ،
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲﺍﺵ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺷﺮﺍﺭﺕ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﺭﺗﻲ ﻣﻮﻟﺪ.
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺗﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﺸﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺣﺶ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩﮔﻲ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮕﺶ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻜﻴﺪﻩﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﮔﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻼ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ ،ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ
ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ ،ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻨﻬﺎ ،ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻠﻲ ،ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
***
ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﺣﻞﻧﺎﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ :ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻜﺲ ،ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ .ﻫﻢ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭﺩ ﺟﺎﻧﻔﺮﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﺁﻥ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ،ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺑﺮﺣﻖ
ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻭﻫﻢ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﺩ
٦۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻣﻘﺼﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ) ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺭﻣﺰﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ( ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺗﺒﺎﻫﻲ ﺳﻜﺲ )ﺳﻜﺲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭ
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ،ﺳﻜﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺟﺰ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ( ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﭘﻮﺷﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ،ﭘﻮﺷﺶ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ) .ﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ
ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ :ﺳﻜﺲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻳﻜﺎﺗﻮﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﻣﻀﺤﻜﺶ ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺛﺎﺑﺖﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ،ﻛﻞ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ
ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺳﻜﺲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ
ﺁﻝ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻤﻜﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺍﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺧﻮﺏ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺗﺠﺮﻳﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ
٦۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ /ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺟﺰ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺱ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﻪﻭﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻟﻐﻮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ،ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﺎﻭﻩﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻬﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﺭﺩﻩﺑﻨﺪﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ) .ﻭ ﺭﺩﻩﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﺒﺎﻓﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ( .ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚﻫﺎﻳﻲ )ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ(
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻬﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ،ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﺜﻨﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺳﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ
ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪﻳﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ
٦۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻧﻴﭽﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺷﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ .ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ» :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺨﻤﺼﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﻗﺖ
ﺳﺮﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺒﻬﻮﺕ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻴﻢ .ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ،ﺟﺪﻳﺖ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ،
ﺍﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺘﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ )ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ)ﻡ(( ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺶ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﭼﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍً ﺗﻜﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ "ﻭ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ )ﺻﺮﻓﺎً( ﺍﺩﺑﻴﺎﺕ )ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﻲ( ﺍﺳﺖ ".ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻭ ﺣﻮﺵ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ ﺗﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ
ﺯﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺍﻧﺰﺍﻝ ﺯﻭﺩﺭﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ) ،ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﮔﻲ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻱ
ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ )ﻡ(( ﺗﻤﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ،ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ
ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﻭ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻲ
ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺛﻘﻞﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻟﻴﺒﻴﺪﻭﻳﻲ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ
٦٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ »ﺷﻤﺎ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ:
ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﺴﺮﻳﻊ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻋﻴﻨﺎً ﻧﺴﺨﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ :ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﭽﺮﺧﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ
ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻬﻠﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﻣﺪﻝ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ :ﺑﺮ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻮﻟﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ )ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﻟﺬﺕ(.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻟﺬﺕ ،ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎﻱ
ﺯﻳﺮﺩﺳﺖ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﻗﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻖ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
٦٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺯﺍﻳﺶ ،ﺧﻮﻥ ،ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﺩﺍﺩﻥ ،ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺩﻭﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ -ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺑﺪﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ -ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺟﺰ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﺯﺣﻤﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎ،
ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺍﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ -ﺑﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺪ ﺑﺪﻥ ،ﻳﻚ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﻭ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﺟﺰ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺟﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺪﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ
»ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ« ﻟﻴﺒﻴﺪﻳﻨﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ »ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ« ﺑﺪﻥ ﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﻞ،
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺧﻴﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭﺭﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺸﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻴﻞ ﺷﻤﺎ ،ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺷﻤﺎ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻟﻪ ﻱ ﺑﻲﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺗﻮﺳﻴﻊ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ :ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ
٦٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﻟﻴﺒﻴﺪﻳﻨﺎﻝ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﻧﻔﺮﺍﺩﻱ
ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺧﺎﺭﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ .ﺗﻤﻼﻳﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ« ﺍﺯ ﺍﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻲ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻫﺮ ﺟﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﺪﻝ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻪﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻧﻤﺎﻧﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻏﺎﻳﺐ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺘﻮﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻳﻚ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻜﺲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ:
ﺭﺍﻫﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﻧﻊ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ )ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ( ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺧﻮﺩ
٦۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ.
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﻴﻚ ﻭ ﮔﻴﺰ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ .ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺒﻼً ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻏﻴﺮ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ،ﻧﺎﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺑﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻟﻮﮊﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﻭ ﻋﻘﺐ
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ
ﺑﺎﺭ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻧﮋﺍﺩ ﭘﺮﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻧﻜﺮﺩﻧﻲ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ
ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺗﺼﻌﻴﺪﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏﺷﺪﻩ
ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻳﺖ ،ﻓﺌﻮﺩﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺍﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻗﺘﻲ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﺍﻩﮔﺸﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺳﻜﺲ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭ،
٦۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻓﻮﻛﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﻮﺍﻓﻘﺖ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ) .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ) ،ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ( ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﻧﺘﺎﮊ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﭘﻴﻤﻮﺩﻩﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻲﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ
ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺳﺮ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻔﺎﻑﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻧﻬﺪ ﻭ
»ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ« ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺍﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ -
ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ )ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ (..ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺳﻮﻣﻴﻦ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﻜﻮﻩ
ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﺎﺭﺕ ،ﺯﻳﺒﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭘﺸﺘﻲ )ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﭽﻪ ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﻨﺎﻣﺪ(.
ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﺪﻝ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎ ،ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺗﺌﻮﺭﻳﻜﻲ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮﻱ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺋﻖﻧﺸﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ )ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ( .ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺍﻣﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻳﺎ
ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ »ﺻﺤﻨﻪ« ﻳﺎ »ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ« ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ
٦۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻞ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ )ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ( ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
***
ﺳﻴﻄﺮﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﻭﻧﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﻢ
ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﻜﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺑﻬﺒﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻼﺝ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻟﻮﻱ -ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻭﺱ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺯ »ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ« ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺳﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻗﺼﺎﺏ ﭼﺎﻧﮓ ﺗﺴﻮ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﺍﺯ ﺗﻴﻐﻪ ﭼﺎﻗﻮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﮔﺎﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ
"ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ" ﺩﺍﺭﺩ -ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺿﻤﻴﻤﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻲ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﺑﻪ
ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ .ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ« ﻣﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﻓﻖﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﭼﻴﺮﻩ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﺍﺵ ﭘﻮﭺ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
۷۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺻﺮﻓﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻛﻲ ﺯﻥ ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺘﺎﻃﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﻘﻴﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺯﻥ ﭘﺮﺧﺎﺷﮕﺮﺍﻧﻪ
ﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻬﺖ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ« ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺭﻧﺠﻴﺪﻩ ،ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ» :ﺁﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﻬﺖ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ
ﻛﻨﻢ» «.ﭘﺲ ﺑﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺕ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻛﻦ« .ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻨﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ» :ﻳﻚ ﻗﻬﻮﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﻬﻢ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻛﻨﻲ «.ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻨﻮﺩ ،ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻱ ،ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻇﺮﺍﻓﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺣﺸﻲﮔﺮﻱ
ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﺶ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻨﻮﺩ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ » ﺗﻮﭖ ﺷﻴﺰﻭﻓﺮﻧﻲﻫﺎ« ﻛﺎﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻴﭗ ﺩﻳﻚ: ۲۷
» ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ«
۷۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﺷﺎﻋﺮﺍﻧﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ
ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻲ ﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻨﻮﺩ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﭘﻴﭻ ﻭﺗﺎﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ .ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺒﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﺪ ﺧﺸﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ.
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺤﺾ ،ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻱ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻜﺲ ،ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺴﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﮔﺮﺩﻳﺴﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﻧﻤﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺁﻥ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ
ﺍﻱ ،ﺍﻏﻔﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻔﺎﻝ ﻫﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻔﺎﻑ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻌﻘﺘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﮔﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﻪ،
ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ،ﺗﺒﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺷﺮﻁﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻔﺘﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺤﺎﻟﻪ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ.
۷۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﻣﺎﻳﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻨﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻜﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺭﻭﺩ .ﻫﻴﺞ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺻﻔﺮﻱ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮﻱ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﺑﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺷﺮﻁﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮﻳﺘﻪﺍﻱ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺘﺮﻭﭘﻴﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ -ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ) .ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺁﻓﺘﺎﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﻄﻴﻼﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺻﻔﺮ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﭼﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﻳﻨﻲ ،ﭼﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻧﻔﻬﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ؟ )ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪ :ﭼﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
۷۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﻟﻐﻮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﺎﺕ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻫﻤﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍ -
ﺳﻴﻞ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻲ ،ﻟﻐﻮ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻣﺮﮒ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﺎﺕ -ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻏﻠﻂ
ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺮ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﻫﻢ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ؟
***
ﻣﻨﻄﻖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ،ﻣﻨﻄﻖﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﺍﺯ ﺳﻜﺲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪﺗﺮﻧﺪ .ﺳﻜﺲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺣﺮﻑ ﺁﺧﺮ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ »ﺍﻣﭙﺮﺍﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ« ،ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻓﺸﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻏﺎﻣﺾ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺟﺰ ﻣﺮﮒ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺯﻭﺝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ
ﻛﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺳﻮﻕ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ) ،ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺳﺨﺘﮕﻴﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﺳﺖ( ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ :ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺁﻥ ،ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﺒﻘﺖ ﺟﻮﻳﻨﺪ .ﻳﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺘﺮ ،ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ،ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ،ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﻧﻘﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺯﻥ
۷٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺻﻞ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ /ﺳﻜﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ.
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻧﺎﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ،
ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺳﻜﺲ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻋﻤﻞ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﺶ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺯﻧﺎﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺎﺭﻡ( ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻱ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
***
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻭ ﺳﻜﺲ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ) .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻓﻤﻴﻨﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﻫﻤﺠﻨﺲﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ( ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻭﺭﺍﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺿﺪﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ،
)ﺣﺸﻮ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺧﻴﺮ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻪ
ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺟﻼﺩ )ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭﮔﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻤﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎً ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ،
۷٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺭﺥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ( ﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ :ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ
ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺪﻋﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻨﺶ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ »ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ« ﻭ » ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ«
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﺁﻥ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ .ﻳﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﻪ
ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺑﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ (.ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ؛ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺗﻮﻫﻤﺎﺕ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؛ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻫﻤﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ
ﮔﺮﺩﺩ) .ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ( ﺍﺯ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً
۷٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﻭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ
ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﭘﺴﻴﻦ ﻛﻮﺭﺳﻮﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ .ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﻭﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﻟﻐﻮ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ،
ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺎﻗﺖﻓﺮﺳﺎﺗﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ
ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ،ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ -ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ -ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡ ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺭﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺮ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ -ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ -ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﻛﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﻭﻡ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ،ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻣﺸﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﻠﻤﻮﺱ ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪ ﻗﺮﻳﺐ ﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻉﺷﺎﻥ ،ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎﻱ
ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ -ﺗﻪ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﭘﺲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﻫﺎ -ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ
ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ) .ﺗﻀﺮﻉﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﻡﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ( ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻓﻖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ،ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ
۷۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ،ﻟﺬﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ،ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ،ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ :ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ
ﻣﺘﺄﺳﻔﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﺍﻣﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ« ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﭘﺎﺷﺪ .ﻓﺮﺩ
ﮔﺮﺩﺩ )ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ( ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﻫﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ :ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ،ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺭﺷﺪ،
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ،ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ،ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ) .ﺑﺎ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﻛﻮﭼﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ،
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻭ ..ﻫﻤﻪ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﻧﺪ( .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻗﻠﺒﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻗﻮﻳﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﻗﻮﻳﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺧﺼﻴﺼﻪ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ
ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻭﺍﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ،
ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﺎﺯﻝ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ
ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ.
۷۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ،ﻃﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻩ ﻛﻤﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻟﺬﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻣﺎً ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ،ﺣﺬﻑ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺳﻜﺲ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺳﻜﺲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ
***
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻮﻛﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ )ﺟﻠﺪ (۱ﺑﺎﺯﮔﻮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻓﻮﻛﻮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ .ﻭﻱ ﻣﺠﺬﻭﺏ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺒﺎﻉ
ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ )ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ( ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ
ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ )ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ( ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻲ،
ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ »ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ« ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺣﻴﺮﺕﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﻣﺰﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
۷۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺮﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺯﺩﻭﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﻮﻛﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﮔﺸﺖ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻣﺴﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺍﻱﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺗﺎﺑﻨﺪﮔﻲ
ﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﻭ
ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻭ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ
)ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ( .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺁﻳﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻲ ﻓﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﺧﺼﺎﻳﺺ ﻣﻤﺘﺎﺯﺷﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺻﺸﺎﻥ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺤﻜﻴﻢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺷﺒﺎﺡﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﻴﺰﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻥ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺳﺮﻃﺎﻧﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺭﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ) ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲ( ﺍﮔﺮ ﺳﺮﻃﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻬﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﺑﻪ »ﻛﺪ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ«
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﻳﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﺩِ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ.
)ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺳﺮﻃﺎﻧﻲ ﺻﺮﻑ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ( ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﻛﻠﻲ
۸۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺑﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻘﺐ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ،ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺍﻩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺍﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺼﻮﻝﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻓﻮﻛﻮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﻗﺼﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺣﻴﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺮ ﻛﻠﻲ ،ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ
ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩﺷﻮﺩ.
۸۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭘﺎﻧﻮﺷﺖ
1ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﻜﻲ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻓﺎﻟﻮﺱ
ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻳﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻡ.ﻑ
hans bellmer 2 ﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﺑﻠﻤﺮ ،ﻫﻨﺮﻣﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺡ ﺳﻮﺭﺋﺎﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﻋﺮﻭﺳﻚﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﻭ
ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺢ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ.
3
Gilles Deleuze
4
Joan Riviere
:Transvestite 5ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺯﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻪ ﻡ.ﻑ
6ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺮﻧﺴﻮﺳﺘﻴﺴﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.ﻡ.ﻑ
Drag Queen 7 ﻫﺎ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻲ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻡ.ﻑ
9
Bettleheim, Symbolic Wounds
- × 10ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﭽﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﭘﺪﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺨﺘﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﺑﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺗﺎﺑﻮﻫﺎ ،ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺭﻭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻄﻬﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
11
the Empire of the senses
12ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ.ﻡ.ﻑ
13
Laclos
.Giacomo Casanova. 14 ﻛﺎﺯﺍﻧﻮﺍ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﮔﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺪﺭﺕ ﺯﻧﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ
ﻭﺭﺯﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ :ﻫﻤﻨﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻥ ،ﺗﻌﻤﻖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺶﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ
ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺍﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻡ.ﻑ
Marquis De Sade (1740 1814) 15 ﻣﺎﺭﻛﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﺩ ﻧﻮﻳﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱ ﻣﻮﻟﻒ ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﺮﺯﻩﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ.ﻡ.ﻑ
Salo 16 ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺮ ﭘﺎﺋﻮﻟﻮ ﭘﺎﺯﻭﻟﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﻗﺘﺒﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﺩ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺁﺷﻮﺑﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻨﺰﺟﺮﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻤﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻧﻘﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﻢ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ .ﻡ.ﻑ
17
Frani;ois Roustang, Dire Mastery
18
Judith Belladonna Barbara Penton
۸۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
19ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﻬﻴﻴﺞ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻣﻨﺒﻌﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻡ(
20ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺳﻪ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺟﺴﺘﻪ
ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﮕﺮ ,ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻴﻨﺎً ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ Trompe l'oeil . ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﮊﺭﻓﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﭼﺸﻢﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﻳﺘﻮﺱ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ "ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺩﺭ ﮊﺭﻓﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ".ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ
ﮊﺭﻓﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﻲﺍﻳﺴﺘﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺯﻋﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ "ﻧﻤﻮﺩ" ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﻡ ،ﮊﺭﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﻣﻄﻠﻘﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ.
21ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻓﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻡ.ﻑ
:quadrophonicsﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﭼﻬﺎﺭ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻟﻪ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺮ speakerﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻮﺷﻪ ﺳﺎﻟﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ 22
24
blue Porn
25ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﻩﺧﻄﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ -ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ ﺧﻄﻲ ﺩﺭ" ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭﺿﻮﺡ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ" ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﭘﻮﺭﻧﻮﮔﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﺧﻄﻲ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻡ .ﻑ
26ﺩﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ duelﻫﻢ duelﻭ ﻫﻢ dualﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻦ .ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺻﻔﺖ ،ﺑﻪ
duelﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﻡ .ﻡ .ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴﻲ.
27
Philip Dick
۸۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻓﺼﻞ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ
۸٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﺍﺵ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ،
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ،ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﺍﺵ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﺍﺵ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ؛ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻲ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻋﻤﻖ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺭﺧﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺳﻄﺮ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎً ]ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ[ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻳﻚ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﺧﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻃﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺁﻥ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﺴﻠﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺨﻦ ،ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﺳﺨﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺤﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖﺍﺵ -ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﺟﺰﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺟﻮﺍﻳﺰﺵ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑﺍﻧﺪ -ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻲ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﻳﺶ ،ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﻳﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ،ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ِ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﺨﻦﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ِ
ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺎً ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ،
ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺁﻥﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ »ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ« ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻴﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻱ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲﺍﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺸﺘﻘﺎﺗﺶ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﺰﺋﻲﺍﺵ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻄﺢ
ﺁﻥ) .ﭼﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﻲ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﺷﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺷﻜﺎﻓﺎﻧﻪ( ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ِ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﻫﻴﭽﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻜﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﺳﺖ :ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻴﺎﺩﻱ ِ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ،ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺩﺍﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺯﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱﺍﺵ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﺍﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺮﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﺳﺨﻦ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻً ﺳﺨﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻲ ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﺄﺛﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻏﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻢﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪﻛﺮﺩﻥ
۸٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﺍﺵ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ،ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؛ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﺴﺤﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ِ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﺍﺵ ﺗﻬﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ.
ﻫﺮ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ،
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ :ﺑﺎﺯ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﻃﺌﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ )ﭼﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ( ﺍﺯ ﺑﻦ ﺑﻴﺎﻓﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ]ﻳﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ[ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥِ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﻋﺎﺩﻻﻧﻪﺗﺮ ،ﺑﺪﻝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻭ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﺮﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺮ
ﺧﻄﻲ ِ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﺩﺭﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺮﺧﻴﺰﺩ ،ﻣﺜﻞ
ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻱ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ،ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﭼﻴﺮﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻓﺎﻧﺘﺰﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻫﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻮءﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻥ ِﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻲﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ.
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﻤﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ )ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪﻱ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩﻱ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ( ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺪﺳﺖﺁﻣﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻗﻤﺎﺭﻱ »ﺩﺭﻋﻤﻖ«،
ﺯﻭﺩﮔﺬﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﺭﺟﺤﻴﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ
۸۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ]ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﻫﻪ ﺍﺯ[ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ
ﺁﻥ ،ﻛﻠﻴﺖ )ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭِ( ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻛﻦ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ )ﻳﺎ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻛﻦ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ(
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ -ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴﻤﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎً ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ
ﺷﻜﺴﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﺭﺍﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺛﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ِ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺳﻴﺒﻲ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ ،ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻛﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﻧﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱِ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ:
ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﺶ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ) (idﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ
ﻳﺎ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺁﻏﺎﺯﺩ .ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻀﺎﻋﻒ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ،
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻴﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺧﺸﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﻄﻲ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ »ﻛﺎﺭ« ِ
ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ،ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﻠﻌﺪ .ﻛﻞِ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ِ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻳﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﻛﺸﻲ ﻛﻴﻨﻪﺟﻮﻳﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏﺷﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺩﺭ ﺧﻂ ﺳﻴﺮ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ
***
ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ -ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻛﺸﺶ
۸۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﺭﻭﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ )ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻲ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ( ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺩﺭ
ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺍﻣﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﻲ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻴﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺗﻀﺎﻳﻔﻲ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻛﺸﺶ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲِ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ ،ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ِ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻱ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ِ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ) (۱۹۰۷ﮔﺎﻣﻲ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﻜﻢ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺎﻧﺘﺰﻱ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ،
ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﻭ .. .ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ،ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺮﺳﻮﻡﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻻﭘﻼﻧﺶ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺘﺎﻟﻴﺲ
ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻓﺎﺗﺢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻔﺎﻟﻪ ،ﻳﻚ ﭘﺲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺎﺋﻞ /ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻦ ،ﺗﻠﻘﻲ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺟﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺮ ﺗﻜﻮﻳﻨﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖﺳﺎﺯ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻋﻲ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺳﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﻓﻊ ﺷﻮﺩﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭﻱ
ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦِ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﮕﻮ ،ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
۸۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪﻱ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﻢﺗﺮ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ،ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏﺷﺪﮔﻲ ،ﻋﻘﺪﻩﻱ ﺍﺩﻳﭗ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺍﻝ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪﺭﻓﺖ؛ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﺧﻄﺮﺳﺎﺯ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺷﺪ ،ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻮﺳﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﻮﺳﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﮔﺮﺍﻡﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ِ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﻲﺁﻏﺎﺯﺩ -ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﺷﻜﻨﻲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺣﺮﻑﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻨﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ
ﺗﻼﺵ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻴﺪﻫﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪﺩﻟﻴﻞ
ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﺑﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﻮﺳﻮﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻪ ) (axiomﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺷﺪ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻱ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺖ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ِ ﻗﺘﻞ ِ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ،ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﮔﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪﻱ ﻋﻠﻢ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ،
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻌﺘﺮﻑ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻮﺳﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻏﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻬﻮﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ
۹۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﻢ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺷﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻴﺮﺍﺛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ
ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﺭﺛﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ
ﻧﺎﺑﻬﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﺎﮔﺮﺍﻡﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺭﺛﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ِ ]ﺑﺎﺯﻱ[ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺫﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻱ ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎً ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺗﺎﺑﻮﺕ ﺳﻨﮕﻲ ِ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﻣﺤﻜﻢﺗﺮ ﻣﻬﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻡ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﻜﻲ ِ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻫﺎﻟﻪﻱ
ﺩﺍﻝ ﻓﺮﻭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ.
***
ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻫﺎﻟﻪﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻓﺮﻭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﺎﻟﻪﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ
ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻳﺸﺨﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻱ
ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ،ﺳﻄﺢ ﺁﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺣﺸﺖﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺭﻳﺰﻱ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎً ﺣﻘﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﺩ )ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﮔﻲ »ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﮔﻮﻧﻪ« ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺁﺷﮕﺎﺭﮔﻲﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺤﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ
»ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ« ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﺪ (.ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻭ
ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻴﻨﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ
۹۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺽﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﺸﻨﺞﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ -ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻢ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﭼﺎﻟﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺠﺎﻡ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﺪﻓﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﮒِ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ )ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟( ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﺎً ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ( ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺿﻤﻦ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﺠﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻫﻴﭽﮕﺎﻩ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ!( ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻲﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﻻﻛﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ِ ﺣﻴﻄﻪﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ
-ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻠﺶ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ -ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﺑﺘﺬﺍﻝِ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦِ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ،ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯ ﻣﺮﮒِ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻻﻛﺎﻥﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺑﻲﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ِ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ،ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ،ﺗﺼﺤﻴﺢ ﻭ ﺟﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺷﻴﺎﺩﻱﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻡ /ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺳﻠﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺳﻠﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﺩ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺨﻦ ﻻﻛﺎﻥﮔﺮﺍ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ
۹۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﻠﺐ ﻣﺎﻟﻜﻴﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺗﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ ،ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎً ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ )ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ( ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭﻗﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩﻱ
)ﺑﺪﻟﻲ( ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﮕﻮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻼﻡ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﻼ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻻﻛﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻣﺮﮒِ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ،
ﻣﺮﮔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺪﻳﺪﮔﻲ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪﻱ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺪﻳﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ ِ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮِ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺭﻭﻱﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺩﺍﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ
ﻳﻚ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺩﺳﺖﻛﻢ ]ﺑﺎ ﻻﻛﺎﻥ[ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻣﺠﺎﻟﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻴﺎﺩ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ
ﺯﻳﺒﺎﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻭﺯﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﭘﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﻲﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻡﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺗﻬﻲﺍﻧﺪ )ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻟﺠﻪ ﮔﻨﺠﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( -ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺷﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻟﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ( ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺟﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﻟﻢ ﺑﺪﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺮﺩ -ﻭ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻭ ﺁﻥ
۹۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺟﺰ ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪﺍﻱ
ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻙ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ِ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﺗﺎ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ -ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ِ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ -ﺁﺗﺶ ِ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ
ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺷﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻓﺮﻡ /ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ -ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﻭﻫﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺄﻭﻳﻞ-
ﻭﻫﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺗﻮﻫﻤﻲ ﻻﻛﺎﻥﮔﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ِ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ِ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺨﻔﻴﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺁﮔﺎﻩﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦِ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ِ ﺷﻬﻮﺩﻱ ِ
ﺩﻭﺳﺖﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ :ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻒﺷﺪﻩ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺯﻳﺴﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺷﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺗﺤﻤﻞ
ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ )ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ( .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﺎً ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ،ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ِ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ِﺧﺪﺍ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ِ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ.
۹٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺺ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﺑﻮﺯﻳﻨﻪﻭﺍﺭﺵ :ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮ
ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻟﻴﻨﻴﺴﻢ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﻲﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺵ ،ﻋﺪﻡ ِ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﭙﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺭﻳﻮﺍﺭﻝ
ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ» :ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻨﺪ« -ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ِ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ِ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ
»ﻣﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ
ﻧﻴﭽﻪ
۹٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﺷﻴﺎﻱ ﺭﺩﻩﻱ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻴﻜﻨﺪ .ﺷﻜﻞِ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ِ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻨﻴﻒﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ِ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ﻣﻨﻘﺮﺽﺷﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﺯﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ »ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩ« ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺯﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻬﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺪ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺿﺪﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲِ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻳﺎ
ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﭘﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ِ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﻗﻄﻊ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﭼﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﺰﺍﺭﻩﺍﻧﺪ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺑﻲﺟﺎﻥ ،ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻬﻲ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺎﺑﻠﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻭ.. .
۹٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻲ ﻟﺸﮕﺮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﺍﺣﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻠﻮﺕ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺟﺬﺑﻪﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪﻱ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺟﺬﺑﻪﻱ ﺣﺎﺩِ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ِ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺷﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺭﻧﺴﺎﻧﺲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻬﻢ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻫﺎﻧﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ،ﻋﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻛﻮﺭ -ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎ ،ﻣﻴﺦﻫﺎ ،ﺗﺨﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻏﺬﺍ -ﻣﻨﺰﻭﻱ ،ﭘﻮﺳﻴﺪﻩ ،ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺨﻮﻑ ،ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ
ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﮔﻢﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺯﻳﺴﺘﻦ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻭ
ﺩﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﻨﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺯﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺾ،
***
ﻧﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻲ ﻫﺴﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻩﺍﻱ ،ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ Trompe L'œil ﺩﺭ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ .ﻧﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲﺍﻱ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﻲ .ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﭘﺲ
۹۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻱ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺳﻄﺢ ِ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎ
ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ.
ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ،ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ،ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﮔﻲ ،ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﺷﺪﻥ -ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﺎﻏﺬ )ﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺒﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﮔﻲ ﻣﺤﻮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻮﺏ ﻛﻬﻨﻪﻱ ﻗﺎﺏﺍﺵ ﻛﻪ ﮔﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﺎﻋﺘﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻘﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺳﺎﻋﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﺪﺱﺯﺩﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻭﺍﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ :ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺳﭙﺮﻱﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺯﻳﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ
ﻧﻪ ﻣﻴﻮﻩﺍﻱ ،ﮔﻮﺷﺘﻲ ﻳﺎ ﮔﻠﻲ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺳﺒﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪ ﮔﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ )ﺑﻲﺟﺎﻥ( ﻳﺎﻓﺖﺷﻮﺩ .ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺑﻲﺟﺎﻥ ﺗﺰﺗﻴﺒﻲ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺑﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺍﻓﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺑﻲﺟﺎﻥ
ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺒﻪﻱ ﺑﺮﻳﺪﻩﻱ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﮔﻲ ِ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﺩﺭﺁﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻨﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻓﻖﻭﺍﺭﮔﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺑﻲﻭﺯﻧﻲ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻌﻠﻖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ،ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻮﺭ ﻭ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻜﺘﻴﻮ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺑﻲﺟﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺳﺎﻳﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪﻱ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ Trompe L'œil ﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﺍﻳﻴﺪﻩﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ
۹۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﺷﺪﻥ ِ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﻱ ﺧﻔﻴﻒ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺭﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺗﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢﺍﺵ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ،
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺁﺏ ﺭﺍﻛﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺁﺑﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻋﻤﻖ ،ﻟﻄﻴﻒ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﮔﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ )ﺟﻮﻫﺮﺷﺎﻥ( ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻓﺘﺎﺏ ﺑﺮﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﻲﺗﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺗﺮ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ِ ﺟﻮ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻜﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎً ﻣﺮﮒ
ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﺎﺑﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻓﺘﺎﺏ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؛ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﻭﺏ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ؛ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺣﺎﺷﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ .ﻧﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻧﻪﻱ ﻧﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ )ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺗﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﺄﺕ ﺍﺷﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﻧﺎﭼﻴﺰ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ِ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻩ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺳﻮﮊﻩﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ
ﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ِ ﺣﻴﺮﺕﺁﻭﺭ ﺗﺄﺛﺮ :Trompe L'œil
ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﻱ ﻟﻤﺴﻲﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﻨﺎﻱ ِ ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ِ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻭ
ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ِ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﺎﺯﮔﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ
۹۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
Trompe ﻳﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺶ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ
L'œilﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ :ﻧﺸﺎﻃﻲ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻌﺠﺰﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺠﺰﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ِ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ Trompe L'œil ﺍﮔﺮ
ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥﺍﺵ ،ﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻧﮕﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﺋﻮﺱ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥﻗﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﭘﺮﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻮﻙ ﻣﻲﺯﺩﻧﺪ :ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﭘﻮﭺ .ﻣﻌﺠﺰﻩﻫﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻔﺮﻁ ﻣﻨﺘﺞ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻌﻜﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﻔﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ِ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﮕﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺒﻲ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ
ﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﮕﻲ ِ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ِ ﮊﺭﻑ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ -ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﺎﻥ ﻟﻤﺲ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺩ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻟﻤﺴﻲ ِ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ
»ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ «:ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺎﻧﺘﺰﻱ ِ ﻟﻤﺴﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺑﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺲ
ﻻﻣﺴﻪﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻩﺍﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ »ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﮓ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ« ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪﭼﻨﮓﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﺑﻪ »ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ«
ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ« ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻜﺘﻴﻮ» .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ِﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ،ﻣﺠﺴﻤﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ِ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ] ،ﺍﻣﺎ [ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻪﻱ
۱۰۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺣﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ِ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻲ )(Trompe L'œil
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ.
***
ﺳﻌﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ Trompe L'œil
ﻫﺸﻴﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻓﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺩﺍﻱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺩﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ِ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺿﻊ ِ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻳﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ
ﺗﻤﺜﻴﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺭﺍﻓﺸﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺏ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻌﻨﻪﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﻋﻤﻖ ﺳﺮﻭﺗﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺭﻧﺴﺎﻧﺲ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺩﻭﺭ
ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺭﺍ ﮔﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ ) -Trompe L'œilﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ِ
ﺷﺨﺺ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻛﺮﺩﻥِ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻭﻟﻮﻳﺖﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻱ ﮔﻴﺰ
) .(gazeﭼﺸﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﻮﻟﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ِ ﻭﺍﮔﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﮔﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻼﻗﻲ ِ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ِ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺷﻐﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ِ ﺍﻓﻖ ﻳﺎ
۱۰۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻓﻖﻭﺍﺭﮔﻲ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﺁﻥ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺣﻴﻄﻪﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﮔﻴﺰ ِ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭽﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺳﻮﻡ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻜﺘﻴﻮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎً ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮕﺮِ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ِ ﻧﺎﻗﺺ ِ
ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ِ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ِ ﻧﺎﻗﺼﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﻱ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ -ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻧﺴﺎﻧﺲ ﻧﻮﺭ ﻋﺠﻴﺒﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ِ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ِﻧﻮ ﻭ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ
ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﻣﻲﺗﺎﺑﺎﻧﺪ Trompe L'œil .ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻃﻌﻨﻪﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺸﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
L'œilﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻗﺴﻤﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﻚ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻳﺎ
ﻋﻤﻠﮕﺮﺍﻳﻲ ِﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺲ ِ ﻫﺸﻴﺎﺭﻱ ِ ﻣﺎ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ِ ﺟﻨﺒﻪﻱ ﻏﻠﻂ
ﻳﺎ ﻣﻌﻜﻮﺱ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ِ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ِﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪﺍﻳﻦﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻟﺬﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱﺷﺎﻥ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
۱۰۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺷﮕﻔﺘﻲ ِ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﺍﻳﻴﺪﻩﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺯ
***
Trompe L'œilﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻋﺼﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻛﻮ
) ] (stuccoﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎ[ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺑﺪﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺮﻥ ﺷﺎﻧﺰﺩﻫﻢ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻲﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ِ
ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ،ﻣﺠﺴﻤﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻘﻔﻲ ِ ﺭﻧﺴﺎﻧﺲ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺭﻭﻙ ،ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺴﻤﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭﻱ ِ Trompe L'œilﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺧﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﺲﺁﻧﺠﻠﺲ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﻳﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ :ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ِ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ِ
ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ؟
***
ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ِ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ِ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ :ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻟﻮ )(studioloﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﻙ ﺍﻭﺭﺑﻴﻨﻮ
ﻭ ﻓﺪﺭﻳﮕﻮ ﺩﺍﻣﻮﻧﺘﻪ ﻓﻠﺘﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺥ ﺩﻭﻙ ﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﺍﻭﺭﺑﻴﻨﻮ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺑﻴﻮ :ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻪﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺩﺭ Trompe L'œilﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ] ،ﻭ[ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ﻛﺎﺥ .ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻴﺮﮔﻲ ِ ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻜﺘﻴﻮ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻟﻮ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ِ ﻛﻮﭼﻚﺷﺪﻩﺍﻱ ) (microcosmﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﮊﮔﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﻄﻊ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﺯ
۱۰۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﺎﺑﻘﻲ ِ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ِ ﭘﻨﺠﺮﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ِ ﻓﻀﺎ -ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺒﻴﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺎﺥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻞ ،ﻳﻚ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ِ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮ )ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ( ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻟﻮﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺭﻳﺰ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻟﻮﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻠﻴﺴﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻤﺠﻮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻗﺒﺎً ﺑﻪ ﻛﻞ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻛﺎﺥ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ِ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺎﻫﺰﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺯﻧﺎﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺎﺭﻡ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺷﻜﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺎﻫﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺎﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ
Trompe ﻛﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻃﺮﺡﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻤﺜﻴﻞ ِ
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﻣﻴﺸﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻃﻌﻨﻪﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺣﺪﺱ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ L'œil
ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻌﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ،ﺷﻬﺮ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﻧﻮﻥ ِ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺮﺳﭙﻜﺘﻴﻮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺎﻫﺰﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ ﻭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺭﺍﺯﺩﺍﺭﻱ
ﻧﺰﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻳﺴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺵ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺟﺰ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲﺷﺪﻩ .ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻛﻮﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺎﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ِﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻛﺮﺩﻥِ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦِ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻔﺎ ﻭﺿﻊﺷﺪﻩ،
۱۰٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺣﻔﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ،ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻃﻌﻨﻪ
ﺁﻣﻴﺰ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ،ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﭘﺎﭖ ،ﺑﺎﺯﭘﺮﺱ ﻏﺎﻳﻲ؛ ﻛﺸﻴﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺪﺍﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﺍ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺯﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﺷﺎﻥ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺩﻳﻮﻟﻮﻱ ِ ﻣﻮﻧﺘﻪ ﻓﻠﺘﺮﻩ ﺩﺭ
Trompe L'œilﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺨﻔﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻏﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ،
ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً »ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ« ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﺑﺎﮊﮔﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻧﻲﺍﺳﺖ -ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ
۱۰٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭼﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲ ،ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﺤﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﮔﻤﺸﺪﻩ Trompe L'œil ﺩﺭ
ﻃﻠﺴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎﻣﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﻫﻤﻪﻱ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﮔﻢﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ
ﻳﻜﻲﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻱ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ
ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ.
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﻱ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩ
ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺧﻢﺷﺪﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﻛﻪﻱ ﺁﺏ ،ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ
ﺗﺸﻨﮕﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻓﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﺵ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ »ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ« ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻭ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻭﺭﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍﻩ
۱۰٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺄﻭﺭﺍﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪﻱ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺳﻲﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻭ
ﻫﻨﺮ -ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ،ﻳﻚ ﺁﻭﺍﺯ ،ﻳﻚ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ،ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﺧﺎﺏ ،ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻳﻲ ﺑﻲﺷﺎﺥ ﻭ ﺩﻡ ،ﺑﺎ
ﻧﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻨﻮﻥ ،ﺑﺎ ﺷﻬﺮﺗﺸﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮔﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ -ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﺑﺎ
ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ -ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻪﮔﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ]ﻭ[ ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻱ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ] .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ[ ﻫﻤﻪﻱ
ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﺗﻀﻌﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺺ ]ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ[ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﺶ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺷﻤﺎ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ -ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻱ ﻳﻜﺘﺎﻱ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲﺍﺵ -ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ،
ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺩﻟﺮﺑﺎﻳﺶ ] ،ﻳﻚ[ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ -ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﻲ ...
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﻱ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ
۱۰۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ،ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪﻱ
ﻏﻴﺒﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻱ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻠﻌﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻭ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﺁﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺍﺭﮔﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺬﺑﻪﻱ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ )ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﻨﺪ( ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻩﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮﻧﺪ .ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﻋﻤﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ،
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﺍﺏ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻧﺸﺄﺕﻧﮕﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﻭﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺘﺞ
ﻧﺎﺭﻛﻴﺴﻮﺱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮﻱ ﺩﻭﻗﻠﻮ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻮ ﻭ
ﻟﺒﺎﺱﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ .ﻧﺎﺭﻛﻴﺴﻮﺱ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮﺵ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮﺵ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﻬﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻓﺖ؛ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ
ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﺗﺴﻜﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﻓﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ،H.P Jeudyﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ؛ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ]ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ[ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺩﻭﻗﻠﻮﻱ ﻓﻮﺕﺷﺪﻩﺍﺵ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱﺍﺵ ﭼﻴﺮﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﻱ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ
ﺩﻭﻗﻠﻮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﺗﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﻫﻤﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﮒ
۱۰۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ -ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺍﺵ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ» .ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮ
ﺫﻫﻨﻲ« ﻧﺴﺨﻪﻱ ﺭﻭﺣﻲﺷﺪﻩﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﺩﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺴﻮﻟﺪ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺎﺭﻡﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎً ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﺘﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪﻱ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻦ ﺯﻧﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺯﻧﺎﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ
ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻨﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻣﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻛﻪ ]ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﻲ[ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ،ﺗﺴﻠﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪﻱ
ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ.
***
»ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﺕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢﺑﻮﺩ« ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ »ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﺗﻮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ« ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ »ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺗﻮ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢﺑﻮﺩ« ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﻣﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ]ﺳﭙﺲ[ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ِ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﻭﻫﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺯﺩﻳﺪﻩﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ]ﺩﺭ ،ﻳﺎ[ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻭﮔﺸﻮﺩﮔﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺷﺪﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﻳﺒﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻳﺐﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ،ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺑﻪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻭﻫﻢﺁﻟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﮔﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؛ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ
۱۰۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﻳﮕﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﺶ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖﺷﺎﻥ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻴﺰﻱﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻠﻂ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ِﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖﺍﺵ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺠﺎﻣﺪ ،ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﻻﻗﻮﻩ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﻣﺎﺕ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺭﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻫﻢ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻨﺸﺎﻥ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺵ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ] ﺍﺯﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ[ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻤﺖ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺸﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺭﺿﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩﺍﺵ
ﻓﺮﻳﻔﺘﻪﺷﺪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ »ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ«
ﻣﻲﺭﻫﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ]ﻋﻤﻞ[ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩﻱ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ
ﺧﻠﻂ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ
]ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ[ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻏﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦﺍﺵ ،ﻣﻨﻜﺴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ]ﻓﻀﺎﻫﺎﻱ[ ﻋﻠﻢ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ،ﻣﻮﻋﺪ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻠﻲ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﻩﻱ
۱۱۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻫﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻫﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺗﻜﻪﺍﻱ ﭼﺮﻡ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﻫﻤﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﻲ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ،
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻋﻄﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ،ﻣﻮﺟﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻪ ،ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺩﻭﻗﻠﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺬﺑﻪﻱ ﻭﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺰ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﮒ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺮﺵ
ﻣﻲﻧﺸﻴﻨﺪ .ﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ،ﺍﻏﻔﺎﻝ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﺎً ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺘﺪﺍﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
H. I Jeudy
ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﻚﻛﺮﺩ؛ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺍﻝ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻴﺪ .ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺝﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﻱ
ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺘﻲ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻫﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﻲ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ]ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ[
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻏﻴﺮ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺞ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ -ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻃﺎﻟﻊ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺝﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺍﺯﺩﻩﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺲ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺎﻟﻊﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺨﻨﺪﺩ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺁﻥﻛﺲ ﻛﻪ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺎﻟﻊﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻃﺎﻟﻊﺍﺵ ﻏﻤﮕﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﺍﻗﺒﺎﻟﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻳﻚﺟﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺎﻟﻊﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻘﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺑﺪﺍﻗﺒﺎﻟﻲﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻧﺸﺪﮔﻲ ِﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻓﻠﻜﻲ ِﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺗﺎﺏﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩِ
۱۱۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻃﺎﻟﻊﺍﺵ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﭘﺎﺩﺍﺵ ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﮕﻲﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺭﺿﺎﺷﺪﮔﻲ
ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩﺍﺵ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﻫﻤﺎﻥﻃﻮﺭﻛﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﭘﻼﺳﺘﻴﻚ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ
ﻳﺘﻴﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺎﻟﻊﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﻃﺎﻟﻊ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦﺷﺎﻥ ﺁﺷﺘﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺘﻲ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺑﻮﺩ
ﺩﺳﺖﻛﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﻣﺘﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺸﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻪﻱ ﻧﺤﻮﻩﻱ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻛﻪ
۱۱۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﺮﮒ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺮﻗﻨﺪ
ﻳﻚ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ :ﻳﻚ ﻭﻫﻢ .ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻛﺸﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﺎ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺷﺘﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺥ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺒﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺗﺎ ﺷﺒﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﮕﺎﻝ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﺩﺳﺘﻬﺎ ﺑﮕﺮﻳﺰﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺳﻤﺮﻗﻨﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﺷﺎﻩ ﻣﺮﮒ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺥ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﺩﻣﺎﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺳﺮﺯﻧﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺣﻴﺮﺕﺯﺩﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ" :ﻗﺼﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺗﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺩﻳﺪﻡ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﺍﻱ )ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﺯ( ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺮﻗﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻴﻢ".
ﺁﺭﻱ ،ﺁﻥﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﻲ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺩ ﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ
)ﺩﺭﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ( ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻳﺰﺩ .ﺁﺭﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺟﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ )ﺩﺭ
۱۱۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ( ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺎﺟﺰﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺑﺨﺶﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﺭﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ
ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺮﻗﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﻓﺎﻋﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻥ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺑﻬﺖﺁﻭﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺪ ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ
"ﻣﺮﮒ" ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻴﻦﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺮﻗﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺮﮒ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻜﻢ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻜﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ
ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ )ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ "ﻣﺮﮒ" ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻧﺎﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ (.ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻜﻤﻲ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﻧﻲ ﺣﻴﺮﺕﺁﻭﺭ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺤﻮﺱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺿﻊ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺗﻘﺎﺭﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻂ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﺯﻧﺶﺷﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺒﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﻋﺎﺭﻳﻪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ )ﻫﻴﭻ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ(
ﻛﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺠﺮﻡ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﺲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ
۱۱٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ،ﺩﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ )ﻣﺮﮒ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﮕﺮﻳﺰﺩ( ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ
۲۸
ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﻧﺒﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ
ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﺁﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﺍﺯﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ )ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﻣﺮﮒ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻬﻴﻚ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ )ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ( ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ) .ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ( ﻣﺮﮒ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻫﺠﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ )ﺍﺛﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺭﻭﺡ( ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﻧﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺘﻲ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻋﺎﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩ ﻣﺮﮒ
ﺗﻤﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ( ﻭ ﺩﻭ )ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﺍﺯ( ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻋﺠﺎﺏ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻟﺬﺕﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻋﺠﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ
ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ" :ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻤﺮ ﻗﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ
ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ )ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ( ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺻﺮﻑﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ )ﻣﺤﻞ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ( ﺑﺮﺳﺪ "...ﺍﻣﺎ
۱۱٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﺮﮒ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻋﺠﺎﺏﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻑ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻋﻄﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ -ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﻣﻲﺷﺘﺎﺑﺪ.
ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ .ﻣﺮﮒ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻘﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ ،ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺟﺎﺑﻪﺟﺎﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻣﻲﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ )ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ( ﺑﻪ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭽﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻟﺒﺨﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ )ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ( .ﺍﺭﺗﻔﺎﻉ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻴﻨﻪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺷﺘﻪ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥ.
۱۱٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ "ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ" ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺑﺖ ﻛﻪ
***
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻮﭺ ﻭ ﻓﺸﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺷﺮﻁ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻧﮓ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺩﻡ ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻩ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﭘﺴﺮ ﻛﻮﭘﻚ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ" :ﻫﻤﻪﺍﺵ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ!" ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎً ﻣﻲﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؟ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻡ ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺩﻡ ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻩ )ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎً( ﻭﺍﺭﺩ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻼﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ )ﻋﻬﺪﺵ( ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﺭﻧﮓ ﻗﺮﻣﺰﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭﺵ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﺏﻫﺎﻳﺶ .ﻋﻠﻲﺭﻏﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻼﺵﺍﺵ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺘﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ )ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﺵ( ﻣﺤﻮ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﭘﻮﭺ ﺑﻲﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺳﻤﺞ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻛﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﻫﺎﻧﻴﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ )ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ( ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﻪ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻬﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﻱ ﻣﻘﺮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻴﻞﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺩﺍﺩ) .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ( ﺍﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺧﺮﻩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ )ﺍﻓﻜﺎﺭﺵ ﺭﺍ( ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﭘﺎﻙ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻤﻴﺮﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭘﻮﭺ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺣﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻟﻲ
۱۱۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭘﺮﻱ ﻣﻮﺫﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ )ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ( ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺫﻫﻦ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻧﮓ
ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺩﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻩ )ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭﻓﺎ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ(
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻄﻴﻌﻲ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺳﺎﻳﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲﺍﺵ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺤﺾ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻟﻲ ﭘﻮﭺ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﺍﻱ ﺗﻬﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ )ﻣﺘﻀﻤﻦ( ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﻭ ﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﺘﺮﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺘﺮﺍﺯ
ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ )ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ( ﺩﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺸﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﺳﺘﺎﻧﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ" .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺸﺎﻳﺪ - ".ﺁﻳﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺁﻥﭼﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ
ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻥﭼﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ( ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻧﺐ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺗﺎﻡ
ﺍﻋﻄﺎ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﻬﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﺍﻱ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﺭﻭﺡ
ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻧﻲ )ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ( ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ) .ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭘﺮﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﮔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ (.ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦﺷﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ
۱۱۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺍﺩﺍ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻋﻈﻴﻢﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻭﺟﻬﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻳﻚ )ﻧﻮﻉ( ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ -ﺍﺭﺿﺎﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ )ﻳﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻟﻐﺎﮔﺮ( ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﮓ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ .ﻣﺜﻞ ﺭﻧﮓ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺩﻡ ﺭﻭﺑﺎﻩ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻫﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﺮﻱ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﻌﻀﻲ
ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻱ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﻨﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩﺍﺵ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﺭﺩﺳﺮﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻮﻳﻲﻫﺎ( ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻫﻴﭽﮕﺎﻩ( ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻮﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﮔﺮﻱ ﻛﻼﻣﻲ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺤﺮ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺪﺍﻡ )ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﺷﺎﻥ( ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻭ ﻭﺟﻬﻪﺍﻱ
ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺪﺍﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ .ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻭﺳﺎﻃﺖﻣﻨﺪ
ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﮕﻲ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ.
ﺍﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻠﺴﻢﺍﺵ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﺎﺯﺁﻭﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺯﮔﺸﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
۱۱۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺟﺬﺑﻪﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﻃﻠﺴﻢﺷﺎﻥ ﺟﺰء ﺩﺳﺘﻪﻱ ﺧﻄﺎﺑﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻲﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦﺍﺵ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ
***
ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺻﺪﺍ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻮ .ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪﻱ ﺑﻮﻱ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻬﺪ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻥ .ﭘﻠﻨﮓ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺵ ﻣﻨﺘﺸﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻮﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻴﺮﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﺶ
ﺳﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺟﻮﻳﺪ .ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ )ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺵ ﻭﺣﺸﺖﺁﻓﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺑﻮﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﻡ ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﮓ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺩ :ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻃﻌﻤﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺷﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻮﻱ ﺍﺩﻭﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﻱ ﮔﻴﺎﻫﺎﻥ )ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ
ﺑﻮﻱ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺭﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭼﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﻪﻱ ﺳﺎﻳﺮﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻕ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﻭ ﻳﺎ
ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﮕﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﭼﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻏﺎﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﻱ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﻳﺎ
ﺩﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺸﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺴﺦ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻓﺴﺦ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻴﺰ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ
۱۲۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻲﺭﻭﺡ .ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩ )ﻣﻴﻞ( ﻓﺎﺵﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻮﻱ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﺎً ﻳﻚ
ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺑﻲﺭﻭﺡ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺯﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ
ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﺍﺵ) .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ( ﺳﺎﻳﺮﻥﻫﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺳﺤﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪﻱ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﭼﺸﻤﻬﺎ .ﻣﺤﺾﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻡ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺯﺍء ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ
ﻣﺤﻮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﻣﻲﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻲ
ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ .ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻦﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﺠﻬﻮﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺩﻟﺨﻮﺍﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ
ﺳﺎﻛﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺣﺮﻛﺖ.
ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻟﺬﺕﺑﺨﺶ ﮔﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﻫﮕﺸﺎﻱ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﺳﺖﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺝ ﻧﻘﺼﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻻﻣﺴﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ
ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎ )ﻭ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﻠﻬﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ؟( ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻳﻜﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ
ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻥﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺷﮕﻔﺖﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺠﺴﻢﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪ -ﻳﻚ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻑ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﺴﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ )ﻫﻤﺘﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ( ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﺸﻤﻬﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﻲ
ﺗﺎﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺗﻬﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﮔﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ
۱۲۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭼﺸﻤﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻃﻠﺴﻤﻲﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺮﺡﺭﻳﺰﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻃﺮﺣﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻤﻘﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻮﻗﺘﻲ.
***
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﻣﺠﺬﻭﺑﻴﺖ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﺴﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐﮔﺮﻱﺷﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺠﺬﻭﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻬﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴﻢ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻳﭗﺗﻴﺰ )ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﺍﺵ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ( ﻳﺎ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻗﻄﻊ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﻄﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺘﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﭘﺴﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﺍﺵ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻏﺎﻳﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﻈﺮﻩ ﺩﻗﻴﻖﺷﺪﻩ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ-
ﻳﻚ ﺯﻥ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻴﺶ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ
ﭼﺎﻟﺸﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻴﺮﻩﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ؟
)ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺮﮔﻲ ﺑﻪ( ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺯﻥ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺟﻠﺐﺗﻮﺟﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻲﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻣﺴﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁ
ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻔﺎ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻭ )ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻔﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﮔﻲ(
۱۲۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻃﺮﺍﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ
ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ :ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻉ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﭘﺴﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻔﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ
ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪﻫﺎﻱ
۱۲۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺭﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﺭﺍﺯ:
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﻫﻠﻪﻱ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺧﺼﻴﺼﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ ﮔﻔﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺗﺮﻏﻴﺐ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍﺯ "ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ" ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻓﺎﺵ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﺪﻳﻖ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺪﺳﺘﻲ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ
۲۹
ﻭﺍﻧﮕﻬﻲ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺎﺵ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ، ﺧﺒﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ...ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻓﺎﺵ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺭﺍﺯ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻟﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺣﻮﻝ
ﻫﺮﺁﻥﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﺳﺨﻦ،
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺭﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺳﻬﻴﻢ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺭﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺪﺳﺖﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
۱۲٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺭﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ
ﻣﻘﺪﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺭﺍﺯ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ
ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻣﻜﺎﻟﻤﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺣﺘﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ )ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﺩ .(.ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻳﺶ ،ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ "ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ" ،۳۰ﻛﻴﺮﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﺭ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺣﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﻤﺎ ﺑﺸﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺎﺵ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻓﺎﺵ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺮﻣﻼ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ )ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ( ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻜﺲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺭﺥ ﺩﻫﺪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ -ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ /ﺭﺍﺯ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﺘﺮ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻟﻤﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﻻﻟﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻳﻲ ﺯﻳﺮ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ -ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍﺯ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺳﻬﻴﻢﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺴﻲ ،ﺳﻬﻴﻢﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺳﻴﻬﻢ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﺳﺨﻦ
۱۲٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻳﻠﻴﻢ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﻮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ،ﺳﺮﮔﺬﺷﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻫﻢ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺷﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﺍﺯﺍﻧﺪ .ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺯِ ﻣﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺯ
ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﻑﮔﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺷﻔﺎﻑﻧﻤﺎ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮﺍً
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻣﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲﺗﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻲ
ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺗﻔﺎﺳﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻄﻌﺎً ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺘﺎﻕ ﺁﻧﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺷﻲ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲﺗﻼﺷﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ
ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ،ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﺍﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ )ﻧﻴﺰ(
***
ﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺿﺮﺑﺎﻫﻨﮓ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﺧﻼﻑ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﻭﺍﺳﻂ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﻡ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺁﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
۱۲٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﻭﻫﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﻥ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻚ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﻲﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﻠﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﻪ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﻲ :ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺳﻮﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺮﺯﻱ ﺳﻮﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺯﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﮔﺮﺩﺷﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﻣﻮﺯ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﮕﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﻥﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻛﺸﺶ ﻭ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ،ﺟﺬﺏ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻛﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﭘﺎﺷﺎﻧﺪ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻃﻠﺒﻲ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻗﻲ ﺁﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ
ﺁﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺑﻨﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﺪ.
۱۲۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺭﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﺣﺘﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻌﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺤﻀﺶ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﻑﺯﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮﺍً ﺻﻮﺭﻱﺍﺵ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
***
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ .ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﺳﻮﺩﻩﻧﻤﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺘﮕﻲ ﺁﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ
ﻣﺴﺤﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﺨﻨﻲ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﭘﻮﭼﻲﺍﺵ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻌﻘﻮﻟﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﺳﺮﺍﺭﺁﻣﻴﺰ:
ﭼﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﭼﻪﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﺯﺍﺩﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﻧﻪﻭﺍﺭ
ﺑﺮﺍﻩ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ :ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ .ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻛﺮﺩﻩ )ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻓﺮﻗﻲ
۱۲۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺭﻳﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ :ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﮓ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐﻫﺎ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ،ﺁﻧﻲ ،ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﻭ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺩﺭﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ(.
ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ) (cantactﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺁﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ.
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻃﻨﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻲ ﺑﺪﺳﺖﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ،ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ،
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ
ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻞ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻞ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
***
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ،ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺿﻌﻔﻲ ﺣﺴﺎﺏﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺿﻌﻔﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﻪ :ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ
۱۲۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻓﺘﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺵ ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ،ﻣﻐﺎﻛﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﭘﻠﻨﮓ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻳﺤﻪ
ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ،ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻭﻗﻮﻉ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺵ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺻﺤﻪ ﻣﻲ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .
ﺭﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻦ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﮔﻴﺰ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ.
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻥ ﺷﻜﻨﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻝ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎً ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺬﻫﺐ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﻮﻳﺰ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺿﻌﻒ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻣﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ.
***
ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻐﻤﻪ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ :ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺭﻭﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ،ﺳﺒﻜﺴﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺯﺍﺋﺪ
۱۳۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﺮﻭﻑ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﻓﺎﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻄﺎﺑﻖ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ
ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﺣﺎﺩﺛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﻫﺬﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻭﻫﻢﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﻲ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ .ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﮋﻭﺍﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻤﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ .ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﺎ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﺯﻭ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﺸﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺴﺐ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ
۱۳۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﻃﻞ -ﺣﻔﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺷﻌﻠﻪﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺳﻮﺯﺩ -ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ -ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﺶ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪﻱ ،ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺹ ،ﻭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ،ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱﺷﺎﻥ ،ﻗﺎﺩﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺎﻟﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺴﺦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻔﻬﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﺁﻫﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻘﻲ ﺷﺎﻋﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺁﻫﺴﺘﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱﺍﺵ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻏﻴﺎﺑﺶ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ
»ﻣﻴﻞ« ﺍﺳﺖ.
۱۳۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺗﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ
ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺸﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﻜﺴﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ
ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻏﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﺤﺾ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﻳﻲ /ﻧﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺳﻮﺳﻮ ﺯﺩﻥ ،ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻳﻤﻲ ﻫﻴﭙﻨﻮﺗﻴﺴﻤﻲ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ،ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺯﻥ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ،ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺟﻨﺴﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ )ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺁﺧﺮ( -ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻜﻨﺪ ،ﻳﺎ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﺗﻼﻓﻲ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﻭﻱ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻃﻔﺮﻩﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺴﺘﺎﺧﻲ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ
ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺣﻘﺎﻳﻖ ﺭﺍ ﻟﺮﺯﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺗﻌﺶ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺩﺭ
ﺳﻮﺳﻮ ﺯﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ .ﺍﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
۱۳۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻃﻠﺒﻴﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﺎﻥﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻧﻈﺮﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻳﺮﻳﻠﻴﻮ
ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻲ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺪﻥ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺍﮔﺮﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ /ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﺑﺪﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺭﻭﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﺴﻼﻧﺪ.
ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻳﻮﺭﺁﻻﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﭘﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﻔﺖ ﻭ ﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ
ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﻫﺮﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺯﻳﻮﺭ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺒﻮﻍ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ،ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖﺍﻧﺪ" :ﻣﻦ
ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺑﻮﺭﺯﻡ ،ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺮﻳﻢ ﻛﻨﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺒﺨﺸﻢ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ --ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺑﻮﺭﺯﻳﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺪﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺸﻮﻳﺪ" .ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﻲ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻫﺮ ﻣﻬﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻛﻮﺁﺭﺗﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻬﻠﺘﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺩﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﻴﻦ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
۱۳٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻭ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻥ ،ﻳﻚ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ،ﻳﻚ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﺑﻲﺷﻜﻞ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ -ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ،ﺑﺪﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ
ﺍﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺪﻧﺶ ،ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺎ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﮊﻩﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﻡ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ »ﺳﻜﺲ« »ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ« ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻪ »
ﻣﻴﻞ« ﻣﺮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻃﻠﺴﻢ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺭﻭﺩ" :ﻣﻦ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻢ ﭘﺲ ﺷﻤﺎﻳﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﺪ"
"ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻃﻠﺴﻢ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ".
ﻧﺰﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻏﻨﻴﻤﺖ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺘﺮ ،ﻫﺪﻑ،
ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﻔﺘﻦ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺷﻌﻠﻪﻭﺭ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡﺷﺪﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﻴﻞ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﺍﺵ ﺍﻏﻔﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﻭﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ.
ﻓﺮﺩ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻔﻬﻤﺪ ﭼﻪ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺑﻮﺭﺯﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻋﻤﻴﻖﺗﺮ )ﻳﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱﺗﺮ
۱۳٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻐﺎﻙ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ( ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ،
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﻤﺘﺮﺍﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻴﺮﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﺭ ،ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻡ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ
ﺍﻭ ،ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ )ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﻋﺎﺷﻖ
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻮﺳﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﺷﺪﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ( ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺮﺩ
ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺗﺰﻭﻳﺮ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻤﺖ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ )ﺩﺧﺘﺮ( ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ
ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺟﺎﻭﻳﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻜﻲ ،ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺑﺪﻱ ،ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ -ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺷﮕﻔﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻭ
۱۳٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻳﺮﻩ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻭ
ﻓﺮﻭﻣﻲﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻴﺪﻫﺪ ﺍﻟﺼﺎﻕ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻩﻫﺎ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﮔﻨﺎﻩﻛﺎﺭ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﺩﺍﻡ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ:
"ﺑﮕﻮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻛﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ".ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺍﻭ ﭘﻮﭺ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﻋﻤﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﺎﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﻧﻴﻚ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺎﻫﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺰﻡﻫﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎ
"ﻣﻦ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﻪﺍﻡ" ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻜﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻛﻪ ﻇﻮﺍﻫﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻓﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻣﻲﺑﺎﻓﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﭘﻨﻪ ﻟﻮﭘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﭽﻪﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺍﻣﻲﺑﺎﻓﺖ ۳۲.ﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺑﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ.
۱۳۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺲ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﺵ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ،ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻧﮕﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻠﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻟﺸﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﺩﻱﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺑﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺷﻬﻮﺕ ،ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ.
***
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺲ ﻳﺎ ﺟﻨﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻗﻄﺐ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻲ) .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﮕﺮﺵﻫﺎ ﺗﺎ
ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻧﻘﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻣﺠﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟
***
۱۳۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺧﺎﻟﺼﺶ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ
ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺯﻳﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً
ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ،ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺼﻨﻊ -ﺍﺛﺮﺍﺕ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﺾ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻫﺮ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻧﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺴﺨﺮ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻴﺖﺍﻧﺪ؟ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻋﻮﻳﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﮊﺭﻑ ﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ
ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻭﺣﺸﻴﮕﺮﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺩﻣﺪﻣﻲ ﺑﻲﻓﻜﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ
۱۳۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻝ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ
ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ .ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ :ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻲﺍﻋﺘﻨﺎﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ )ﺳﻨﺘﻲ( ﺛﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺷﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻬﺎ.
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺺﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﺼﺎﻳﺺ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻧﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻬﺎ .ﺭﻳﺨﺖ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ
ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﭘﻮﺳﺘﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺷﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺭﻗﺼﻬﺎ ،ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻱ )ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻡﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻤﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ،ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺘﻲ ﻣﻐﻨﺎﻃﻴﺴﻲ ،ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ
ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻨﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﺮﻓﺘﻨﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ.
۱٤۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﻪﻃﻮﺭﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ
ﭘﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﻧﻮ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺮ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺣﺎﻃﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺗﻨﺎﻭﺑﻲ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ،ﻭ
ﺑﻼﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ،
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﻬﻲﻣﺎﻳﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ )ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ (...ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﺩ
ﻫﻢ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻘﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻓﻖﺗﺮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ .ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﭼﺮﺧﺸﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻭ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻮﺳﺘﺎﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭﺣﺸﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﮔﺮﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻮﺳﺘﺎﻟﻮﮊﻳﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ "ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ".ﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﻲ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺎً ﺑﺎ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦﺍﺵ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺧﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ
۱٤۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻓﺮﻭﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ
ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺌﻪ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻋﻮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﭼﻴﺰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺗﺎ
ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻧﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎ ،ﻃﺮﺡﻫﺎ ،ﺷﻜﻨﺠﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻗﻄﻊ
ﻋﻀﻮﻫﺎ -ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﺍﺡﺍﻧﺪ -ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﺸﻲ ﺯﻳﻨﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ) .ﻛﻪ
ﺧﺼﻴﺼﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﺶ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ :ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺰﺋﻴﻴﻨﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻜﺬﻳﺐ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺣﺸﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻧﺎﺕ ﻧﻪ ﺩﻛﻮﺭﺍﺳﻴﻮﻥ ﻭ
ﺗﺰﺋﻴﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ"ﻛﺎﺩﻭﺋﻮ ۳۳ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻣﻨﺰﺟﺮﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﻴﻢ :ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺠﻦ ،ﺍﺯ ﺭﻳﺨﺖ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ
ﻛﺎﺳﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻴﺰﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﻧﺪﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻜﺰﻳﻜﻮ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﭘﺎﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻴﻦ ،ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻓﺎﺧﺮ ،ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﻟﻨﮕﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻠﻲﻧﺰﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻠﺒﻲ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ
۱٤۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺩﻻﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻔﻘﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﻫﻤﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ )ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ( ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﻣﻲ )ﺑﻴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﻲﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻱﻫﺎ( ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺑﻜﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺭﺗﻮ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ
ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ :ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻭ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺷﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻬﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﺵ ﺍﺣﻴﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ،ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺑﻠﻮﻓﻲ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ،ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﺵﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﻴﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﺎﺭﻣﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﺷﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻛﺎﺩﻭﺋﻮ ،ﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺷﻜﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻨﺪﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ) .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻳﺨﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻫﺎ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﻫﻴﭻ
***
۱٤۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺸﻲ ﻭ
ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺪﺭﺍﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﺴﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺁﮔﺎﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ" .ﻣﻮﺍﻇﺐ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻔﺮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ﺭﻧﮓﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺁﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﺸﻤﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻭ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﺶ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ".ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺣﺎﻻ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺐ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺬﺍﻫﺒﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﺟﻮﻫﺮﻱﺍﺵ.
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺤﻜﻮﻡ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﻘﺒﻴﺢ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﻜﺘﻪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺎﺣﺸﻪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺼﺮﻓﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ" .ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ".ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﻼﻏﺖ
ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ " .ﺯﻧﻲ ﭘﻮﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﺭﺳﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﺩﻟﻔﺮﻳﺒﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﮕﺮﻳﺰﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺩ )ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﻮﺩ( ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﺶ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﻃﻠﺒﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻓﺤﺸﺎﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﺍﺑﮋﻩ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺳﺖﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ -.ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺗﻤﺜﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﻭﺣﺸﺘﻨﺎﻛﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻭ
۱٤٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻫﺎﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﺎﺗﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
۱٤٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ -ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﺪﺭﻧﻴﺘﻪ -ﭘﺲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮ ﻫﺎﺭﻣﻮﻧﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲﺍﺵ
ﭼﻴﺮﻩﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎ ﺭﻳﺎﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﻓﺮﺽ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ -ﭘﺲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ
ﻭ ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪﻱﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶﻫﺎ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ
ﺳﺘﺮﺩﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺕﺍﻧﺪ .ﺳﺘﺮﺩﻥ ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﭼﺸﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ
ﮔﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺮ ﺷﻜﻮﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺣﺪﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻳﺰﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ.
ﺍﻳﻦ "ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ" ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻟﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺿﺮﺑﺘﻲ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ
ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻜﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ،ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺯ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﻭ )ﻣﺮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻥ( ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻠﻮﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﮔﺮﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺁﮔﺎﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﺮﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ .ﻭ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ؟ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺬﺏﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﻳﺎ )ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ .ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻮﻥ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎً ﺍﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺏ ﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ
۱٤٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﺾ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﮔﻔﺖ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺳﺎﻛﻦ ﻳﺎ ﭘﻮﻳﺎ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ
ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻧﺪﻫﻴﻢ؟ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻴﺰﺵ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ﭘﺮﺩﻩﺩﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ؟ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻣﻀﺤﻚ! ﺍﺗﻮﭘﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺖﺷﻜﻦ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ )ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ( ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺷﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺩﺭ ﺯﺩﻭﺩﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ
ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ.
***
ﺑﻲﺷﻚ ،ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻬﺸﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻣﺎ
ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ "ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ" ﺣﺘﻲ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ
ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺯﻥﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻴﻞ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻫﻤﺎﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺭﻗﻴﺐ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ
ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﻭﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﺎﻱ
۱٤۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﺵ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺭﻭﺍﻳﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﭘﺮﺗﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪﺍﺵ ،ﺧﻴﺎﻝ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﺵ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻬﺮﺕ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻃﺮﻳﻘﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻝ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻭ )ﺯﻥ (
ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻨﺮﭘﻴﺸﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺴﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺳﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺴﺎﺳﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺣﺲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ
ﺟﺬﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻠﺴﻪ ﮔﻴﺰﺵ ﻭ ﭘﻮﭼﻲ ﺗﺒﺴﻤﺶ ﻳﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﻣﻌﺮﺍﺝ ﺑﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻧﻘﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﻣﺎﻧﺪ - .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻭﺯﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺣﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﭼﻴﺪﻥ
ﺑﺴﺎﻃﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻣﺰﻱﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪThe ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻘﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ
ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺎﻃﻴﺮ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻭﻱ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
۱٤۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﻡﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺑﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺳﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺩﻭ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﺳﺮﺩ:
ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ.
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ،ﺳﻔﻴﺪﻱ ﻃﻴﻔﻲ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻄﻮﺭ
ﺯﻳﺒﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺎﻡﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ:
ﻧﻮﺭ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻲ ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﻢ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺷﺘﺮﺍﻛﺎﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ
ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺳﻮ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﻨﺪ :ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻗﺼﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻣﻲ ﻭ
ﭘﺮﺗﻮﺍﻓﻜﻨﻲ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻭﺏ ،ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﻭﺭﻳﺴﻢ
ﺗﻤﺠﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻳﻮﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ،ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﻗﺮﻳﺐﺍﻟﻮﻗﻮﻉﺷﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺠﺬﻭﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺴﻮﻑ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ
ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﻲ )ﺛﺎﺑﺖ( ﻭ ﺧﻴﺮﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻮﺷﻴﺎﺭ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺪﺍﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻏﻴﺎﺑﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺎﺑﺶ ﺧﻴﺮﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻮﭼﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺮﺩﻳﺸﺎﻥﺍﻧﺪ )ﺳﺮﺩﻱ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲﺷﺎﻥ( )ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻚ ﻟﻮﻫﺎﻥ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ
ﺳﺮﺩﻧﺪ( ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻳﺦﺑﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺳﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﺮﺯﺍﻥ )ﺳﻮﺳﻮ ﺯﻧﻨﺪﻩ( ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺎﺭﻧﻲ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺸﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ
)ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺵ ﮔﺮﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺳﺮﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ (.ﺗﺼﻨﻊ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺣﺴﻲ )،(non sens
۱٤۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻧﻤﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ﺑﺖﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﻴﻤﺎﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﻮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﺟﺰ ﺗﺒﺴﻤﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ .ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻔﻴﺪﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺳﻮﮊﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺩﻻﻟﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺳﺘﺮﻭﻧﻲ ﺑﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﻤﺮﻍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻛﺴﺘﺮﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﻲﺧﻴﺰﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺜﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﻧﻘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﺪﻳﺲﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻴﺪ ﭘﺎﻙ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺩ :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻗﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ،ﺷﻮﺭﺵ
ﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﮔﺮﻡ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺗﻤﺜﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﺮﮒ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺖﭘﺮﺳﺘﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ
ﺑﻤﻴﺮﻧﺪ؛ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﭼﻪ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﭼﻪ ﻧﺸﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺳﻠﺒﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎﻭﺭﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺑﺪﻳﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻨﻊ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﮔﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ ﺟﺴﻤﻴﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻏﻴﺎﺑﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﺭﺧﺸﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻛﻪ
۱٥۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ،
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺸﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺯﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺣﺴﺎﺏﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﮕﺮﻱ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺣﺮﻳﻒ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ؟ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ
ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ....ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦﺍﻧﺪ -ﺍﻣﺎ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻩﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً "ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ"ﺍﻧﺪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ
)ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ( ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ،ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﭻ ﻭ
ﺧﻤﻲ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﮔﺰﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺪﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ؟
۱٥۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻘﺘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩ
***
ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺱ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ "ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ " ﻛﻴﺮﻛﻪﮔﻮﺭﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ.
ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ
)ﺩﺧﺘﺮ( ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻧﺶ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﺪﺍ ،ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﺑﻲﻫﻤﺘﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﭼﻮﻥ )ﺩﺧﺘﺮ( ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺘﺎً ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻭﺣﺸﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ.
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ
ﺗﻌﻤﺪﺍً ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻭ )ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ( ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺍﻭ ،ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺍﻭ
ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺣﺮﻑ
ﺁﺧﺮ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺷﻮﺩ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺳﺎً ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ
ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ )ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻔﺮﻳﻦﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻤﻲ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ
۱٥۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺍﺯ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻣﻨﺸﺄ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﻳﻮﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ )ﻳﻮﻫﺎﻧﺲ( ﺭﻳﺎﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ
ﺣﺴﺎﺑﮕﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻭ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺑﺎﺷﺪ( ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ
ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﺧﻼﻓﻲ ﻭ ﻫﺮﺯﻩ ،ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻲ
cynicalﺩﺍﻭﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ )ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﻬﺮﻩ ﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﻲ(،
»ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ« ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺪﺳﺖﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ،ﺍﻭ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ،ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻧﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻴﺘﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻫﺮ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ
ﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺑﻲﺣﺮﻣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﺎﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﻘﺘﺪﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﺸﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭﻳﻎ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺟﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ
۱٥۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻘﺸﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﻭﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺑﻲﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﺑﺎﻛﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺎﻟﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮔﺶ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺟﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ) .ﻳﺎ
"ﺩﻓﺘﺮ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ" ﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ .ﻫﻴﺞﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻭ
ﻣﺎﻧﻮﺭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻭﻧﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﻴﺮﻧﮓ ،ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ،ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ
ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺳﻨﮕﺪﻻﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻭ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻮﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺮﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺧﻄﺎﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻴﺪﻫﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺘﻲ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ
ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﺳﻮﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻔﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻫﺮ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﺍﺵ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭﺍﻣﺎﺗﻮﺭﮊﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ .ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻓﺮﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻮﮊﻩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ
***
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻟﺬﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺐ ﺑﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﻳﻮﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺑﻮﺭﮊﻭﺍﺯﻱ،
۱٥٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﻨﻔﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺏ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻱ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺘﻞ )ﺍﺯﺍﻟﻪ
ﺑﻜﺎﺭﺕ( ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎً ﺭﺥ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻮﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱﺍﺵ
ﺣﺘﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺼﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭ ﻟﺬﺕ
ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻪﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻲﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﭘﺲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﮕﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺳﻜﺲ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮﺍ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻧﺎﺯﻝ ﻭ ﺗﺘﻤﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱﺗﺮ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺖ ﻳﺎ
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ .ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﺧﺎﻟﺺ ﺩﻭﻥﺧﻮﺍﻥ ۳۵ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﺯﺍﻧﻮﺍ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻭﻗﻒ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻪﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﺎﺩﺁﻭﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺑﻲﺷﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺮﺩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ )ﺑﺘﻠﻬﻴﻢ( .ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺭﻭﺭﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ،ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺩﺍﻍﻛﺮﺩﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺟﺮﺍﺣﺎﺕ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ )ﻭ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﺩ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ:
۱٥٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ( ﻫﻤﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﻜﻮﺏﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﭼﻴﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺍﺭﮔﺎﺳﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻳﺎﻧﮓ ۳۶ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ.
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ "ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ" ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ
ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ :ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺎﻫﻲ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺭﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺭﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﺶ .ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻛﺸﺘﻦ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
***
۱٥٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﺮﻃﺒﻖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻛﻴﺮﻛﻪﮔﻮﺭ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ" ،ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ" ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﻭﺣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﮔﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻫﺠﺪﻫﻤﻲﺍﺵ ،ﺯﻳﺮﻛﻲ ،ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻟﻮﺩﮔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥﺍﺵ
" ،witzﺿﺮﺑﻪﻱ ﻫﻮﺵ" ۳۷ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ،ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ،ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﻧﺎﭘﺴﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪ
ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻬﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺰﻭﻳﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻭ )ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ( ،ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻲ ﺳﻨﺠﻴﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻘﻼ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻠﻮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻞ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻗﻄﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ )ﻱ ﻗﻠﻢ
ﻣﻮ؟( )ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺑﺎ ﭼﺎﻻﻛﻲ ﻭ ﺻﺮﻓﻪﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ
ﻓﺮﻭﻳﺪﻱ ،ﺑﺎ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ )ﺣﺮﻳﻒ ﺧﻮﺩ -ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺳﻼﺡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﻛﻪ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ،ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ )ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎً ﻣﺨﻮﻑ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ( ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺮﺍﺭﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ،ﻛﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ :ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺧﻄﺎﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ
***
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻟﻨﺎﻣﻪﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ :ﻧﺎﻣﻪﺍﻱ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺯﻥ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻪ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺮﺍﺭﺕ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻟﺬﺍﺕ
"ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ" ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺬﺕ "ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ" ،ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺯﻧﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﻭ
ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺳﺮﭼﺸﻤﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻆ
ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺷﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﻠﺶ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ .ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖ
»ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ«ﺍﺵ ﺑﺮﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺩﻭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻐﺸﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ
۱٥۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻴﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﺩﺭﮔﻢ ﻭ ﮔﻨﮓ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪ ﺍ ﻱ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻋﺪﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ِ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻣﺘﺰﻟﺰﻝ
ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﻓﻴﮕﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻬﺎﻳﺶ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ (.ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪﺍﻱ
ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻳﺎ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻧﺰﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﻣﻲﺁﻣﻴﺰﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﮔﺴﻼﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﺯﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﺯ
ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪ ﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻮﻳﺴﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ،ﺑﻲﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ
***
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻠﻬﺎﻱ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻜﻠﻲ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ :ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺎ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺑﻜﻠﻲ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍﺯﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﺼﻮﺭ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ
۱٥۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭﭘﺎ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺷﻜﻨﺪ؟ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻥ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﻭﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟
ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺑﭙﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻀﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ .ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ،ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺳﺮﺩﻱ ﮔﺮﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ،ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﻭ ﻣﻄﺌﻤﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ )ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻫﺎ( ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻫﺮ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻳﻚ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻌﻜﻮﺱ؟
ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ )ﻭ ﺍﺻﻼً ﭼﺮﺍ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﺭﺥ
ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ( ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻐﺎﻛﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﺍﺕ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺭﻣﺰ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻳﻢ ،ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻏﻠﻂ -ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻗﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ -ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﻱ
ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ
ﺩﻭﺗﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻً ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻔﺠﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﺁﻫﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺗﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﭘﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ
ﻓﺮﺳﺎﻳﺶ ﺁﻫﺴﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ
۱٦۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻫﺮ ﺑﻌﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻋﺪﻡ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ،ﻋﺪﻡ ﻓﺮﻳﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺩﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ؛
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩ) .ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺏ ﺷﻮﭘﻦ ﻫﺎﻭﺭ -ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ(
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻨﺜﻲﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺳﻮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺗﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻫﺮﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﻌﻠﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺗﻸﻟﻮﺋﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﺿﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﺰﻳﺴﺘﻮﺭﻱ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺫﻭﺏ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻧﺎﺷﺪﻩ )ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ -ﻏﻴﺮ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﮔﻔﺖ( ﻭﺟﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻛﻴﻬﺎﻥﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ
ﻃﺒﻘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ )ﺁﺏ /ﺁﺗﺶ ﻫﻮﺍ /ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ (...ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮﻱ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ
"ﺟﺬﺏﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ " ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺁﺏ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺁﺏ ﺭﺍ.
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻗﻮﻳﺎً ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺋﻞﻫﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻭﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺒﻖ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻣﺎ ،ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷﻜﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺘﻜﻲﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺶ
ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ
ﻗﻄﺮﻱ ﻭ ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺸﻜﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
۱٦۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭﻫﻢﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻐﺸﻮﺵ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ )ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻄﻲ
ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺤﺚ ﺍﻣﺘﺰﺍﺝ ﺑﺎﻃﻨﻲ )ﻭ ﻋﺮﻓﺎﻧﻲ)ﻡ(( ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ،ﺩﺍﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ،
ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺗﻲ.
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﺗﻨﻲ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺧﺎﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ
ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﺳﺖ )ﺟﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﻨﺪ( ﺁﻧﻬﺎ )ﺁﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ(
ﺳﮕﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﺻﻪ "ﻧﻤﻮﺩ"ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ
ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻛﺴﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﮔﻴﺰ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻲ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ :ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺎﻫﺮ .ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﭙﺮ ﭘﺮﺳﺌﻮﺱ )ﺳﭙﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﻣﺪﻭﺳﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺩﺍﺩ( ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺪﻭﺳﺎ ﭼﻬﺮﻩ ﺳﻨﮓﺷﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﻴﺮ ﻭ
۱٦۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺷﻴﻔﺘﻪﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﺪ ،ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
»ﻳﻚ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻣﺮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﻄﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺷﺎﻋﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ )ﺩﺧﺘﺮ( ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺁﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ،ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻭ )ﻣﺮﺩ( ﻳﻚ ﺁﺩﻡ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ،ﻳﻚ ﺧﺎﻡ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﻣﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻀﺎﻳﻘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﻣﻦ )ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ( ﻳﻚ
ﺟﻤﺎﻝﭘﺮﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻚ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲﺍﻡ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﺪ؛ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻋﺸﻖ ﻣﻌﻘﺘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ....ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺧﻮﺷﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺸﻖﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ... .ﺷﺎﻋﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ
ﻳﻚ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺍﻣﺎ( ﺷﺎﻋﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ،ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺎﻫﻜﺎﺭ
ﺍﺳﺖ«.
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ)ﺹ (۳۶۴-۳۶۳
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺧﻄﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﺎﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪ) .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ
"ﭼﻪ ﺟﻨﮓﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻴﺰ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﻓﺬ ﻭ ﺟﻬﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺮﻭ
ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻨﺪﻩ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﻝ ﺷﻤﺸﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻮﺍﺭﺕ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﺩﻓﻌﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ...ﻟﺤﻈﻪﻱ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﺮﻳﻒ ﺿﺮﺑﻪﻱ ﺳﺮﻳﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﺣﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ! ﺁﺭﻱ! ﺍﻣﺎ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ".
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ )ﺹ (۳۱۴
۱٦۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﻓﻬﻤﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺸﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺩﺭﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ )ﺩﺧﺘﺮ( ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎً ﻣﺎﻳﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ )ﺣﺮﻛﺖ( ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﺸﻒ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻏﺎﻓﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﻨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ".
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ(۳۳۶-۳۳۷
ﻧﻮﻉ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﮋﻭﺍﻙ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﻫﻴﭙﻨﻮﺗﻴﺰﻡ .ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺭ
"ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﺸﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺏ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﻠﻚﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭼﺸﻤﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ
ﻣﺒﻬﻤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ،ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺪﻧﺶ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺣﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺷﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻓﺮﺯﻭﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ".
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ(۳۶۰-۳۶۱
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﻄﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺎ
ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺳﻄﻮﺡ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻗﻄﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻲﻧﻮﺭﺩﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻭﺭﺗﺮ ،ﺑﺎ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻛﻮﺭ ﻧﺎ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ،ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﻣﻤﻬﻮﺭ ،ﻣﻌﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﻭ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ .ﻛﻞ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺷﮕﻔﺖﺯﺩﻩﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﻔﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻴﺘﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
۱٦٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺍﻭ ،ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﭻ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺏﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻪﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺎﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻤﺎﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺁﻥ ،ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ
ﺟﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﺍﺵ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﺑﮕﺮﺩﻱ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ
ﺧﻮﻳﺶ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ )ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ( ﻓﺮﻭ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﻭﻝ
ﺁﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻭﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﺑﮕﺮﺩﻱﺍﺵ
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻲﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻪ
ﺩﺍﻡ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺶ ﻣﻬﻴﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺁﻳﺪ".ﭼﺸﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺍﻭ
ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ،ﺭﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﻴﻦ ،ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﺮﺍﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﻣﻨﺤﻨﻲﻭﺍﺭ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻴﻌﺖ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﺪ -ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ -ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ.
ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ "ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ" )ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﻴﺮﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﺭﻱ( ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ
۱٦٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺮﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻧﺶ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ
ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ.
"ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻏﺎﻓﻠﮕﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻥ )ﻳﻚ
ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻧﺎﺑﻬﻨﮕﺎﻡ)ﻡ(( ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻛﻨﻢ .ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎً ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺍﻡ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻢ،
ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ .. .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﺪ ،ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻘﻴﻨﺎً ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻢﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻛﻨﻢ) .ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺫﻛﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻓﺖ -ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( ﻗﻮﻝﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻲﺣﻮﺻﻠﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻳﺺ ﻋﻤﻞﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻏﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﮓ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ".
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ(۳۱۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﻗﻊ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻮﻳﻖ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺤﻈﻮﻅ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺷﺪﻥ ،ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻲﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺷﺘﻪﺷﻮﺩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻓﺮﺻﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﺎﻫﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺣﻔﺮ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﺷﻤﺸﻴﺮﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻈﺎﻫﺮ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﺕ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ
ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎً ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻪﺍﺵ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﺗﻴﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﺳﺮﻳﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﺪﻱ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺸﻘﺶ ﺩﻟﺰﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺄﻳﻮﺱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺣﻔﻆ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ،ﻣﻌﻮﻕ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﻭ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻭ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﻔﺘﻦ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎً ﺩﺧﺘﺮ
۱٦٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﻴﺸﻘﺪﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱﺍﺵ )ﺑﺎ ﺷﺨﺺ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ( ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻜﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻗﻴﻌﺘﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﻮﻕ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﻣﻄﻠﻮﺏﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻌﻠﻖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻣﻘﺪﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺒﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻲ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻟﻲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﻣﻲﺁﻓﺮﻳﻨﻨﺪ.
"ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ »ﺳﻪ ﻳﺎﻧﺴﻦ« ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻢ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ
ﭘﭻﭘﭻﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺧﺴﺘﻪﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﻟﺒﺨﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻟﺐ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﺴﻢ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ.
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ ﻳﺎﻧﺴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻢ ﺑﻲﺳﺮ ﻭ ﺻﺪﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻛﺮﺩﻡ ...ﺍﻭ
ﺩﺭﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﻴﺎﻧﻮ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﺍﺧﺖ ... .ﻣﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻢ ﺟﻠﻮ ﺑﭙﺮﻡ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪﭼﻨﮓﺁﻭﺭﻡ- .
ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ...ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ﭘﻴﺎﻧﻮ ﺯﺩﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ . .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﻨﻢ ،ﻣﻮﺫﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻡ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﻓﺘﺪ" .
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ (۳۳۸-۳۳۹
ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﻣﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻴﺎﺷﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﺎﺭ ﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﮕﻲ ،ﻫﻮﺳﻬﺎﻱ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ
ﺩﺳﺖﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ )ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ
ﺩﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻴﺎﺷﺎﻧﻪﺍﺵ :ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻭﺳﺖﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺍﺳﺖ؛
ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭﺭﺯﻳﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺳﺒﻜﺒﺎﻟﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺖ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻋﺸﻖﻭﺭﺯﻱ ﺗﺎ
ﺳﺮ ﺣﺪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ .. .ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻟﺬﺕﺑﺨﺶ! ﻋﺠﺐ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻴﻲ!( ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﻧﺎﺋﻞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ "ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﻻﻱ" ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻭ ﻛﺠﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ »ﻭﺍﻻ«
ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
۱٦۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ :ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ "ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ" .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻮﻛﺪ ﺭﻳﺘﻢ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ ،ﺣﺴﺎﺏﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﻻ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺁﻭﻳﺨﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ )ﺍﻏﻮﺍ( ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﻴﻦﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻛﺮﺧﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺣﺴﻲ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ،ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺐﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﺑﺮﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ" .ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﺰﺍﻉ ﺑﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻬﺎﻳﺶ ".ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
"ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺨﻨﺪﺩ ،ﻳﻚ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻦ ﺑﮕﺮﻳﺰﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺒﺎﻧﻢ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﻦ ﺑﻲﻋﺎﻃﻔﻪ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻢ
ﻭﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﻋﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺭﺟﺰﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺑﻲﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺭﮊﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺲ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﺷﺪﻩﺍﻡ ،ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩ
ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ )ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﻫﻢ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ!( ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺁﻥﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻞ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ".
)ﺹ (۳۷۱-۳۷۰
"ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩﻱ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻣﺘﺤﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺍﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﺮﮔﻲ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺭﻧﺠﻲ ﺭﻗﺖﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ
۱٦۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺗﻬﻲ .ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﮔﻲ ﻫﻮﺱ ﻭ
ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺖﻛﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ
ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ
ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ :ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﻳﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ "...
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ (۳۷۵
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﺮﺽ ﺧﻄﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ
ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻮﺭﮊﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﻗﺮﻥ ﻧﻮﺯﺩﻫﻢ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻟﻮﺩ )ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ(
ﻟﺬﺕﺑﺨﺶ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺵﺁﻭﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺯﺩﻭﺍﺝ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺧﺸﻚ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻣﻬﺎﻱ
ﺭﻓﻴﻊ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺍﺑﮕﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱ( )ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﺴﺎﺏﺷﺪﻩ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻴﺮﻛﻪﮔﻮﺭﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭﺍﻣﺎﺗﻴﻚﺗﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻼﻳﺴﺖ ،ﻫﻮﻟﺪﺭﻟﻴﻦ ،ﻧﻮﻭﺍﻟﻴﺲ ﻭ
ﻛﺎﻓﻜﺎ .ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺩﻧﺎﻙ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻲ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍً ﺑﻲﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ؛ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻮﺳﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱ
ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ )ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺣﺮﻑ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻦﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ( ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻭﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﻌﻮﻕ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻧﺎﺷﻮﻳﻲ
ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ(
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻮﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﻗﺼﻬﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ
ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻮ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺍﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺣﻴﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﭼﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ
۱٦۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ :ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻦ
ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦﺍﺵ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﺗﺶ ﻫﻮﺳﻬﺎﻱ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ
ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺘﺶ .ﻣﺮﺩ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻﻣﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻫﻮﺳﻲ ،ﻭﺭﺍﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻛﺸﻨﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ -ﺿﺮﺑﺘﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻮﺵ،
ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﻛﻪ ،ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺭﻭﺡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮔﺶ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻔﻬﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺺ ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺍﺯ
۱۷۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
-ﻳﻚ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ -ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻇﺮﻳﻒ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ) .ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻄﺌﻤﻦ
ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ(.
ﺑﺎ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺿﺮﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻫﻮﺵ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺯ.
-ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺖ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﻪ "ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ" ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺁﺯﻣﻮﻧﻲ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻲ :ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻜﺘﺐ ﻫﻮﺱ ،ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻲ
"ﻫﺮ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﭽﺸﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﻠﺒﺶ ﻳﻚ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﺩﻧﻪ ۳۸ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺭﻳﺴﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﺍﻫﺶ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ".
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ (۳۹۶
-ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﻳﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﻬﺎﺑﻲ .ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺧﺸﻦ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻫﺮ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ
"ﭘﺲ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﻮﺯﻡ
ﺩﺭ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻣﺎً ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ،ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ،ﺑﻪ
۱۷۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻋﺸﻖ ،ﺩﻟﻤﺸﻐﻮﻟﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺳﻬﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ،ﻭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﻲﺻﺒﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﻮﺯﺍﻧﻢ ...ﺍﻭ ﺷﺠﺎﻋﺖ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺁﻭﺭﺩ ...
ﺍﻭ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﻮﻥ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻦ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﺸﺪ ،ﭘﺲ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻫﻮﺱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻡ ﺍﻭ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ،ﺟﻨﮓ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ
ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ".
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ (۳۸۰-۳۷۹
ﺷﺮﻁﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺣﺮﻳﻒ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻘﺼﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺮﻭ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ
ﻓﻴﮕﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﻪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻏﺮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ
ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝﺗﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ )ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻭ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻭ( ﻳﻚ ﺟﻼﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷﻴﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ
ﺑﻜﺎﺭﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻴﮕﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ،ﺷﺮﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺘﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩﺁﻣﻴﺰles liaisions " " ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻓﺎﺣﺸﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ "ﺗﻤﺎﺱﻫﺎﻱ
،ﺯﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺩﮊﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ Laclos "Dengereuses! ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻻﻛﻠﻮ
ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﮕﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺴﺨﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ -ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ
ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺣﺮﻳﻒ "Presidente " .ﺩﮊﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ
ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻭ
۱۷۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻭﻟﻤﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺗﻮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻃﺌﻪﺍﻱ ﺟﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻬﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﻧﺰﺩ "ﻣﺎﺭﻛﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺳﺎﺩ" ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ
ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻫﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻫﻨﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺳﺎﻥﺗﺴﻮ ﻳﺎ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪ ﺫﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺯﻣﻲ
ﺷﺮﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻓﺰﻭﻧﻲ ﻫﻮﺱ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ" .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﻫﺮ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ
»ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻮﺱ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻮﺳﻲ ﺧﺎﻡ ﺑﻨﺎﻣﻢ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺑﺎ
ﺟﺪﻳﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻲﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻢ ﭘﺲ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﺍ
ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﻠﺤﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻮﺳﻲ ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﺪ
ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻫﺪﺍﻑ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻦ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻋﺎﻟﻲﺗﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪﺍﻡ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻣﻮﺧﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﺍ ﻣﺘﻌﺠﺐ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﻣﻌﻘﺘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺴﺎﺭﺗﺶ
۱۷۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﺯ ﻣﻦ ﭘﻴﺸﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﮓ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﻫﻮﺱ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺍﻭ ،ﺑﻮﺳﻪ ﻭ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ )ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻣﻴﻞ( ﻛﻪ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻨﻊ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻧﺰﺩ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻴﺮﻛﻪﮔﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺷﻴﻠﺮ ،ﻫﻮﻟﺪﺭﻟﻴﻦ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻩ ،ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻛﻨﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﻄﺎ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﻭ
ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼﻳﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻜﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ
ﻫﻮﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ،ﻛﮋﻱ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﮔﻤﺮﺍﻫﻲ ﻭ
ﻫﺮﺯﮔﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻴﺖ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﻭ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
"ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺭﻭﺗﻴﻜﻲ ،ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺠﻬﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﻜﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻲﺟﻨﮕﺪ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﺑﺮﻭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺯﮔﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻧﻲﺍﺵ ،ﺑﺎ ﺷﻴﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺁﻏﻮﺷﺶ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﻄﻤﻴﻊ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ
ﺁﻏﻮﺵﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺶ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻱ ﻟﺒﺎﻧﺶ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﺒﺴﻢ ﭼﻬﺮﻩﺍﺵ ،ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﻞ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺵ .ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﺑﺴﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻟﻜﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ) ۳۹ valkyrieﻧﺪﻳﻤﻪﻫﺎﻱ
۱۷٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻭﺩﻳﻦ (odinﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻴﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺩﺭﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭﺝ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ" .
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ (۴۱۹
ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﻲ ﺯﻭﺩﮔﺬﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﺁﺯﻣﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﺮ
ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻠﻴﻨﺎﻣﻦ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻴﻲ
ﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺗﺶ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻩﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻡ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ
ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺯﻧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺗﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ) .ﺹ (۴۲۴-۴۲۳ﻭ
ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺷﺨﺼﻴﺘﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ِ ﭘﺮ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺕ ِﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻠﺘﻬﺐ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﺧﺪﺍ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ .ﺯﻥ
ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ ِﺧﺪﺍﺳﺖ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺍﻭ )ﺯﻥ( ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﺑﺴﺖ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺎﺕ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭ ،ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﻪﻣﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
"ﺍﻭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺳﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ ،ﺩﻭ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻤﻴﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺩ :ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ
ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ".
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ (۴۲۵
۱۷٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ(.
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺷﻚ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ
ﮔﺮﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﻲﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ )ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﻣﻲﻧﻬﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ( ﻳﻮﻫﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺳﺪ:
"ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻬﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻡ؟ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﻣﻦ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻮﻱ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ( ...ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ؟"
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ (۴۳۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺍﻭﻝ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺩﻭﻡ
ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻗﻪ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻱ
ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
۱۷٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﮓ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﺾ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺗﻤﺴﻔﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺑﺪﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ
ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻓﺴﻮﺱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﮊﺭﻓﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ
ﻣﻲﺧﻴﺰﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ
"ﻣﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﻡ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﺷﺘﺎﺑﻢ؟ .. .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺏ ﻋﺰﻳﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﻴﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺳﺒﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﭘﺎﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺼﺪ ﺑﺮﺳﻴﻢ".
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ (۴۳۹
ﺷﺒﻲ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ" .ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻭﺍﺭﻡ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﻭ )ﺩﺧﺘﺮ( ﺭﺍ
ﻧﺒﻴﻨﻢ" .ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎﻛﺮﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﮋﻭﺍﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ
۱۷۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
"ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﻦ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺑﻮﺩﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ ﻛﻪ ﻧﭙﺘﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺣﻮﺭﻱ
ﻛﺮﺩ :ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻡ".
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ (۴۴۰
ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ،ﺯﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻭﺍﻻﻳﺶ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻮﺱ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﺸﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ
ﻣﺎﻟﻴﺨﻮﻟﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ :ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻋﺸﺎﻕ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﻄﻮﻁ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚﺟﺎ ﮔﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺎﻩ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺣﺰﻥ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻡﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﺮﻫﻢﺑﻨﺪﻱ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﭘﺴﻴﻦ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻥ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻭ ،ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﺗﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﻤﻜﺖ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﺮﺍﻍ ﻭ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﺰ ﭼﺎﻱ"ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ".ﻳﻚ
ﭘﻴﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯ ،ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻠﻮﺩﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺳﻮﺋﺪﻱ .ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻘﺐ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ :ﺍﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ،
ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮﺩ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻳﺴﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺷﺮﻭﻉ ﺩﺭ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺁﺗﺶ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﻓﺘﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ،ﻧﻄﻖ ﺗﺸﻴﻴﻊ ﭘﺎﺭﻭﺩﻳﻚ )ﻣﻀﺤﻚ( ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺸﻖ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺴﺖ
۱۷۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻮﺭﺩﻟﻴﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ ﺟﺰ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎﺯﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﺍﻏﻔﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ
ﻣﻌﻨﻮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺪﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻃﻠﺴﻤﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻥ
ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺁﺩﻡﺭﺑﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ
ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻏﺎﺭﺕ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻜﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ
"ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ...ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱ ﻣﺸﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻋﺎﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﺤﺘﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺯﭘﺎﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦﻧﮕﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ؛
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﮔﻢﺷﺪﮔﺎﻥ ،ﻭ ﺑﻴﻬﻮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻨﻨﺪ".
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ )ﺹ(۳۰۳
۱۷۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻮﺱ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻً ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻮﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺑﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻼ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻮﺷﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﺪﻳﻖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻫﺮ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ ،ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﺎ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ.
ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻚ ﻫﻮﺱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ،ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻣﻴﺰﺩ .ﺍﻭ )ﺯﻥ ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻜﻲ( ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﺮﺍﻕﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻈﺖ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ،ﻧﺪﺍﻣﺖ ﻣﻔﺮﻁ ،ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻩﺭﻭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻗﺖﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﻭ
ﺍﻟﺘﻤﺎﺱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺣﺪ ،ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﺗﻨﻴﺪﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺴﺦ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻃﻔﺮﻩ ﺭﻭﺩ ،ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﺶ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ.
۱۸۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻚ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺘﻲ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﻱ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﮔﺬﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺧﺼﻴﺼﻪ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﻭﺭ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻴﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﻭﻍﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻬﺎﻳﺶ( ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴﻦ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ -ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻔﺎﻝ ﺷﺮﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻳﻲ
ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢﻧﺸﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻲﺣﺲﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﮔﻔﺖ .ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺭﻗﺺﺁﺭﺍﻳﻲﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻚ ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﻬﻴﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ
ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻜﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ .ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻚ ﺑﺪﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻌﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ :ﺯﻧﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺪﻧﺶ ﻣﺴﺦ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺠﺬﻭﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻃﻔﺮﻩﺭﻭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺒﻬﻮﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺗﻲ
ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻱ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﻠﺐ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ(
ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻟﺴﺮﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺎ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻭ
ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﺭﻛﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺮﻙﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻜﺮﻱ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻗﺖ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮﻭ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ )ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻧﻪ
۱۸۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻛﺮﺩﻧﻲﺍﻧﺪ( ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻭﺣﺸﺖﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻜﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ
ﻭﺣﺸﺖﺯﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ،ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻚ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺣﺸﺖﺯﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺍﻭ
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻣﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻏﻴﺎﺏ ،ﺑﺎ ﺭﺍﺯﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ
ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺤﻔﻮﻅ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﻭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ )ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺤﺎﺭ
ﺭﺍ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ،ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﭘﺮﺩﺭﺩ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ( ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻲﻣﻴﻠﻲ ،ﺳﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ -ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﻮﺍﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺯﺩﺍﻳﺪ -ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﺘﻴﻤﺎﺗﻮﻡ ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ" :ﺷﻤﺎ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺳﻌﻲﻛﻦ ﻣﻦ ﺟﺮﺃﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ" .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺳﻠﺒﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﺮﻭ ﺷﻬﺎﻣﺖ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ
)ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﻢ( ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﻣﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺴﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻬﺎ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺄﻛﻴﺪ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ؛ ﻣﺴﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ )ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﻚ ﻭ
ﺳﺮﺩﻣﺰﺍﺟﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ( ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ.
۱۸۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ )ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ( ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻬﺎﻱ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻬﺎﻱ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺑﻲﻣﻴﻠﻲ ،ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ،
ﺍﺿﻄﺮﺍﺏ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷﻜﻲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﻋﺎﺟﺰ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻟﺬﺕ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻨﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻧﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺸﻖ
ﻭﺭﺯﻳﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺗﻮﺍﻧﻤﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ .ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ
ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻳﻦﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ( ﺟﺪﻱ ﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻘﺺﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺬﺕ ،ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺿﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ )ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ( ﻧﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻋﻨﻘﺎ
ﺍﺯ ﺧﺎﻛﺴﺘﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺮﻣﻲﺧﻴﺰﺩ ﻭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺳﻮﮊﻩﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ
ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺑﻲﻋﻼﻗﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻦ
ﺷﻬﺎﻣﺖ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﺏﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺤﻀﺶ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ" :ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ".
ﻫﻮﺱﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪ
ﺍﻋﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﻫﻮﺱ ﻭ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻱ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﺭﮔﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺩﺍﺭ
)ﻛﻠﻜﺴﻴﻮﻧﺮ(
۱۸۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺧﺼﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻄﺒﻴﻖ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺠﺮﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻃﻠﺒﺪ.
ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﻭﺍﻓﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻣﺤﻜﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ،ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺩﺍﺭ ،ﺗﺼﺮﻓﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﻫﻮﺱ ﺑﺖﻭﺍﺭﮔﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺿﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻣﻨﺰﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺪﺍﻧﻲ :ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻤﻊﺁﻭﺭﻱ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺟﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﻣﮕﺮ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻴﻜﻪ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ،ﻭ ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺗﺮﺱ ﻭ ﻭﺣﺸﺖ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ :.ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ
"ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺩﺍﺭ" ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻭ ﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ :ﻗﻬﺮﻣﺎﻥ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺠﺬﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ )ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ
ﻋﺸﻖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ؟ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎ ﻧﻪ ،ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺭ ﻋﺸﻖ
ﺑﻮﺭﺯﺩ( ﭘﺲ ﺯﻧﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺯﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻴﻼﻗﻲﺍﺵ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ
ﻣﺠﻬﺰ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺱ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻬﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺯﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﻠﻴﻪ ﺯﻥ ،ﻣﭽﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺯﻥ ﺑﻲﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻭﻓﺎﻗﻲ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪﺁﻣﻴﺰ
۱۸٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻋﺼﺮ ﻣﺮﺩ ،ﺯﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺻﺮﻑ ﺷﺎﻡ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻴﺎﻁ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺮ
ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ؟ ﺯﻥ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ
ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ ﺍﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻠﻊ ﺳﻼﺡ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻲﺷﻚ ﻫﺮﺩﻭ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ
ﺧﺸﻤﮕﻴﻨﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺭﻭﺑﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺯﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺗﻮﻫﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ
ﻣﺤﺒﻮﺱ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻣﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺯﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻋﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ
ﺷﻬﻮﺕﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻟﺒﻮﻡ ﻋﻜﺴﺶ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ) .ﺍﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺨﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻥ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ( ﺯﻥ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻫﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺮﺍﻗﺒﺘﻲ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺯﻥ ﻣﻲﻣﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﺎﻁ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺩﻓﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺸﻖﻭﺭﺯﻳﺪﻩﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺎﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺯﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
)ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ (.ﻣﺮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ :ﻭﻱ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﺭﺍ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻟﻌﻨﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﺒﻴﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ) .ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺿﻌﻒ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ (.ﺍﻭ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﺗﺼﺮﻑﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ،ﻣﺎﻟﻚ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ -ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﻚ
ﭘﺮﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻟﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﻧﮕﺎﺭﻧﮓ -ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﻭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﻨﻮﺍﺧﺖ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻓﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﻝ ﻫﻢ
۱۸٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﺩﻡ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻛﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥﺩﻭ )ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺩﺍﺭ( ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﻤﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱﺍﺵ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻲ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻨﺎﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
)ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺧﻮﺷﻲ -ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺗﺼﺮﻑﮔﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻓﻲ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻭﺳﻮﺍﺳﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺧﻮﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﺎﺗﺸﺎﻥ (.ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺣﻞﻧﺎﺷﺪﻧﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ :ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺸﻘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ،
ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻟﻄﻴﻒﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ،ﻣﺸﻜﻮﻙﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﻠﻤﺪﺍﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﺺ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺭﺍ
ﺗﺤﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﻭ ،ﺯﻥ )ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ( ﺳﻨﺪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻣﻀﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺳﺎﺩﻳﺴﻢ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻞ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺗﻜﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﺍﻩ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻟﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﺘﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮔﺶ ﭘﺎﺩﺍﺵ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ،ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻭﺍﻻﻳﺶ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺳﺎﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ.
ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ
۱۸٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ ﻧﺎﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻲﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﻓﺎﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﻩﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ،ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮔﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻞ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻨﺎﺏﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﺑﻲﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ،ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼﻳﻲ.
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺗﻼﺷﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺘﻞ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ )ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﺗﻼﺷﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﻮﻥ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ
ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻀﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻡ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺩ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ :ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﮒﺍﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ(؟ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻬﺎﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﭙﺮﺩﺍﺯﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭﻳﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻤﻲ ﺁﻧﻲ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﻇﺎﻟﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ
ﻭ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ،ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﻇﺎﻟﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ
ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺁﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻘﺎﻳﺎﻱ ﺑﺠﺎﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ
ﻣﺮﮒ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﻣﺮﮔﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ،ﺳﺨﺖ ﻭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﻱ
ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ .ﻣﺮﮒ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻴﺜﺎﻕ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
۱۸۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺣﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺑﺮﺩ؟ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻫﻮﺱﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ،ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺧﺼﻤﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎ ،ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺩﻏﻞﺁﻣﻴﺰﺗﺮ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺟﻨﺲ ،ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﭘﺲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ
ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ،ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺬﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻟﺬﺗﻲ ﺣﺴﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺳﺮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ،ﺗﺠﺮﻳﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪﻱ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﻲﺭﻓﺖﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺭﺗﻮ ۴۰ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ،ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻲﻫﻴﭻ ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩﺍﻱ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻛﻪ ﺧﺸﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ
۱۸۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻗﺎﻫﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﻜﻞﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً
ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﻧﺨﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻋﺼﺒﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ،ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﻲﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻛﺴﻲ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻃﻔﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﻭﻗﻒ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ،ﻃﻔﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ.
ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻭ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻲ
)ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ( ﺭﺍ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﻧﻬﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﻃﺮﻑ ﺳﻮﻣﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ )ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩ( ﻭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺩﻱﺍﺵ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﺎﻫﺪﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﻦﺑﻪﺗﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ
ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺗﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺷﻜﺴﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ
ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻫﻴﭻﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ )ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻲ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻠﻐﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻣﻔﺎﺩ ﺩﻟﺒﺨﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ
ﻭ ﺑﻲﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ
۱۸۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
۴۱
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻣﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺰﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ) .ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻠﻮﺳﻮﻓﺴﻜﻲ )(۲
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ،ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ(.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﮕﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻛﺎﺧﻬﺎﻱ ۴۲ﺳﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ،ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ،ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺳﺎﺩﻱ .( sadian) ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﻫﺮﺯﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﺎﺭﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﻧﻬﺎ .ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺯﻭﺝ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺷﻮﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻲ
ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ.
)ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺎﺑﻠﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﻮﺭﮊﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ
ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺭﮊﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ
ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺰﻧﺪ ﻣﺼﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ( ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲﻫﺎ ﻣﻤﻜﻦﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻲﺷﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ " ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺩﺍﺭ"
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻮﺱ ﺗﺼﺮﻓﮕﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭼﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ "ﺭﻗﺼﻨﺪﻩ"
ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺌﻮ ﺷﻴﺮ : ۴۳ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺎﻓﻆ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ )ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺎﻥ( ﺯﻥ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺸﺘﻦ ﺷﺪﻧﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﻗﺼﺪ .ﺯﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻗﺼﺶ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺳﻼﺣﺶ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺯﺩﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺱ.ﺍﺱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ،ﻟﺠﺎﻡﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺟﺬﺑﻪ )ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
۱۹۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻧﺶ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺠﺴﻢﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ( ﻭ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻗﺺ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﻳﻮﺭﺵ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻥﺭﺍ
ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ) .ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺍﻭﻗﺎﺕ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ( ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﭼﺮﺧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺩﺍﺭ ﺩﺭ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻳﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﻢ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ
ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ؟( ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﺯﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺭ ﭼﺮﺧﻴﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺴﺪﻭﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ )ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺩﺍﺭ( ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺯﻥ ﭘﻮﭼﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻜﺎﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ )ﺑﺎ ﺿﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺯﻥ( ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ:
ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻫﺮﺯﻩ ﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺖ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﺠﺎﻭﺯ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻔﺮﺕ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ
ﻭ ﻓﺮﻭﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺠﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺠﺎ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﻱ ﻋﻤﻴﻖ )ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ( ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ :ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍً ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺪﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺭﻣﺰﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻭﻱ ﺳﻌﻲ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﺤﻜﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺘﻨﻲ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻟﻴﺰﻩ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ
۱۹۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﻱ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻜﻨﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺭﺍﺯ ﺭﺍ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ
ﺑﻜﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻌﻄﻒ ،ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎ
ﻃﻠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﻭ ﻭﻗﻴﺢ ،ﺑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺪﺍﻓﻨﺪ ﻣﺼﺎﻟﺤﻪﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﺴﺘﺮﻳﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺴﺐ ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻼ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻛﻨﺪ :ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻨﺂﺷﺎﻥ ﺧﻴﺎﻧﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ :ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺻﻒ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ(ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭ
ﺗﻌﻤﺪﺍً ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﻱﺍﺵ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﻟﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺵ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﺲ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﺪﻓﻲ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻓﻴﮕﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﺭﺍﻫﺒﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻗﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ )ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﻴﻨﻪﺗﻮﺯﻱ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻦ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ( ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ
)ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﻃﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ)ﻡ((
۱۹۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﻮﻥﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻱ ﺑﺮ
ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﺭﻩﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﻮﺷﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﻭﺣﻲ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﺰ ﻣﺮﮔﺶ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺑﺖﻭﺍﺭﮔﻲ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﻣﺮﮒ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ .ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻳﺦ ﺯﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺯﻭﺩﮔﺬﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻳﻜﻨﻮﺍﺧﺖ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ
***
ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻣﻨﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻮﺱ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺩﺍﺭ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ
ﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ ،ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺗﺮﻭﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻪ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻓﺮﺍ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ
ﺳﻜﻮﻥﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺮﺍﺳﻮﻳﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻘﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺧﻂ ﺳﻴﺮﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻜﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ؟ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﻣﻌﻮﺝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺷﻴﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻻﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺍﻓﻖ ﻣﻨﻜﺴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺠﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭﻫﻢ
ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﻃﺎﻋﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻜﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﻴﻢ .ﺟﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻔﺮﻩ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ،ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ
۱۹۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻓﺎﺟﻌﻪﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺭﻫﺎ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﭘﺎﻧﻮﺷﺖ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ 28
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻣﻲﺷﺘﺎﺑﺪ .ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺶ "ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ" ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻔﺼﻞﺗﺮ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ
ﻣﻴﺪﻫﺪ .ﻡ.ﻑ
29ﺭﺍﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﺨﻔﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ
ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.ﻡ.ﻑ
30
Diary of the seducer
31ﻭﻳﺮﻳﻠﻴﻮ :ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺭﺑﺎﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻣﻌﺮﻭﻑ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺩﻳﻒ ﺍﻧﺪﻳﺸﻤﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﭘﺴﺖ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻮﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻳﺮﻳﻠﻴﻮ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻧﺎﻡ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻡ.ﻑ
32ﭘﻨﻬﻪ ﻟﻮﭘﻪ ﺍﺧﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻬﻠﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﮕﺎﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ
ﻫﻤﺴﺮﺵ،ﺍﻭﺩﻳﺴﻪ ،ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻟﻴﭽﻪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﻪﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻓﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﮔﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺸﻮﺩ.
ﻡ.ﻑ
33
Caduveo
34
Charles boudelaire
35
Don Juanﻣﺮﺩ ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻫﻞ ﺍﺳﭙﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺿﺮﺏﺍﻟﻤﺜﻞ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ
36
:Yangﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻣﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﭼﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻮﺭ ،ﮔﺮﻣﺎ ،ﻳﺎ ﺧﺸﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻴﻦ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻛﻨﺪ.
۱۹٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
37
stroke of wit
38
:ariadneﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻣﻴﻨﻮﺱ ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻛﺮﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺴﻮﺱ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﭻ ﻭﺧﻢﻫﺎ ﺑﮕﺬﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺴﻮﺱ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻧﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺗﻦ ﺑﺒﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺴﻮﺱ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺎﻛﺴﻮﺱ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ
ﻛﻴﺮﻛﻪﮔﻮﺭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺪﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻫﺮ ﺩﺧﺘﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﭻ ﻭ ﺧﻢﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﺭﻳﺎﺩﻧﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺩﺍﺩ.
Valkyrieﻧﺪﻳﻤﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﺩﻳﻦodin
39
40
Araud
41
Klossowski
42
chateaux
43
leo Scheer
۱۹٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻓﺼﻞ ﺳﻮﻡ
ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
۱۹٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ
"ﺧﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ" ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺑﺮ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺗﺨﻄﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ -ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺳﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﻭ ﺣﻜﻢ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺘﻲ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻻً ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻴﻄﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻟﻐﻮﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ.
۱۹۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻌﻬﺬﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ )ﺗﺨﻠﻒ( ﻏﻴﺎﺏ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ )ﺑﺎﺯﻱ( ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻴﻜﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮ
ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼﻳﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ،ﺑﺎ ﭼﺮﺧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ،ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺧﻄﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺗﺨﻠﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺨﻄﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﻄﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺟﻬﻴﺪ) .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ (.ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ
ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ -ﭼﻪ ﺩﺍﻝ ،ﭼﻪ ﺍﺧﺘﻪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ -ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻱ ﻣﺸﺮﻭﻉ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﻡ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻋﺮﻓﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻜﺘﻮﻡ .ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ
ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﺑﻲﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺧﻄﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺎﻋﺪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
***
۱۹۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺷﺎﺩﻣﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺳﻮﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻟﺬﺕﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺿﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﺪ ،ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ،
ﺍﺗﻤﺴﻔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺣﻈﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻧﺸﺄﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻴﺎﻻﺗﺶ
ﺑﺮﻭﻥ ﺁﻳﺪ؟ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺻﻼً .ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﻙ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺗﺮﻙ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺎﺟﻮﺍﻧﻤﺮﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺳﺮﺑﺎﺯ ﺯﻧﺪ -ﻛﻪ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ "ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ" ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ -ﺗﻌﻬﺪﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﺩﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻲﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺧﺮ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﻢ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻪ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﺁﻥ
)ﭘﺬﻳﺮﺵ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ( ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭ .ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ
ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ
ﭘﻨﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞ
۱۹۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺎ ،ﻭ ﺁﻧﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻳﻠﻴﻢ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ،ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ
ﺍﺻﻞ ﻣﻨﺤﺼﺮﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﻃﺮﺡ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻲﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﻳﺸﻪ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﻋﻘﺘﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﺍﻭﺭﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺩﺭﻭﻍ ﻣﻲﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﺩ -
)ﻓﻘﻂ( ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ،
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻧﺎﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ :ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻋﻘﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﻲﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩ.
ﻭﺍﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻟﻐﻮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺎﺯ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺗﺴﻮﻳﻪﺣﺴﺎﺑﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﻧﺎﺍﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺴﻮﻳﻪ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻣﺮ
»ﻣﻤﻜﻨﻲ« ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻢ
ﻭ ﺑﻼﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻴﺰ ﭘﻮﻛﺮ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮﻩ( ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﭼﺸﻤﺪﺍﺷﺘﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﻭﻗﻴﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻨﺪﻩ ﻭﺍﻣﻲﻧﻬﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺟﺪﻱﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺟﺪﻱﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾﻧﻤﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺗﻤﺴﻔﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﮕﺮ ﺁﻧﺴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ،ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
۲۰۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻭﻫﻢ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻳﻦ ،ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ،ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﻴﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻳﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ
ﻧﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺎﺳﺖ .ﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻌﻴﻦ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ.
***
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻫﺪﻓﺶ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ
ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼﻱ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺵ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﻫﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﮔﺸﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻲﺍﻱ،
ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺎﺑﺮﺟﺎ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ،ﺳﻮﺩﺍﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺳﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺷﻜﺎﻓﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ
ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻼﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﻣﻨﺶ
ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﺪ.
ﺛﺒﺖ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺮﺯ )ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ (.ﺑﻪ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭﻙ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
۲۰۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﺮﺯ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ
ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺑﻲﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺗﻤﺴﻔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ -
ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﻲﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ
ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻣﻲﻭﺭﺯﻧﺪ .ﺟﻌﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ،ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﻲﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﻄﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ :ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﺣﻮﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ )ﻭ
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﺍﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ (.ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻟﻲ
ﻭ ﺧﺎﺳﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪ ﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻀﺎ ﻭ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺟﺮﻗﻪ ﻧﺎﮔﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﻨﻔﺠﺮ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺒﻮﻩ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻣﺎﺭﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺘﺮﺍﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ )ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﭼﺎﻟﻪ )ﻡ(( .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻠﻮﺭﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﺗﺮﺍﺷﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻗﻬﺎ ﻭ
ﻫﻮﺳﻬﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺎﺏﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻗﻴﺎﺱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭﻳﺖ ﺑﺪﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
۲۰۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺩﺍﻡ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺟﺰ ﺩﺭﻛﻲ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﺮﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﻴﻢ.
ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻬﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ،ﻧﻪ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
)ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺛﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﻣﺼﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ
ﻧﺎﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻓﺮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺖ ﻳﺎ
ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﻴﺮﺩ (.ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﺲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ
ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ" .ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ" ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪﺍﻱ ﺣﻞﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺗﺤﻘﻖﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﻔﺮﻳﻖﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺘﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ) .ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ (.ﻧﻈﺮﻳﻪ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺍﻝﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﻗﻲﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻑ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﭙﺬﻳﺮﺩ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎﺧﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦﺭﻭ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﻠﻒ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺎﺳﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﻡ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻫﻴﺞ
ﻭﺍﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻨﻲ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻃﺮﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﻘﺒﺾ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﮔﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﺎﺑﺨﺸﻮﺩﻩ ﻃﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ
۲۰۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺗﺒﻌﻴﺾﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻭ ﻭﻓﻖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ .ﻭ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ :ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﻔﻜﻴﻚ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ :ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ -ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺻﻮﺭﻱ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ
ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻬﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻧﻪ
ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﺑﻨﺎﻳﻲ -ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﻳﺎ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ -ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ
ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ .ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﻪﺍﺵ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﻬﻴﻢ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻔﺮﻕ ﺷﻨﺎﻭﺭ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻮﺑﻠﻮ ۴۴ﺩﺭ
»ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﻭﺳﻄﺢ« ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﺪ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ) :ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻃﺒﻘﻪ ﺑﻮﺭﮊﻭﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ(
۲۰٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
- ۱ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ
»ﺳﻄﺢ« ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ.
ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺧﻞ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ،ﻓﺮﺍ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭﻳﻲ ،ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﻣﻄﻠﻖ :ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﺪﻟﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻨﺎﻥ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻣﻤﺘﺎﺯ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ .ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﻲﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺗﻦﺑﻪﺗﻨﻲ ﻗﺎﺩﺭﻧﺪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻮﺷﺸﻬﺎ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺴﺘﮕﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺎﺕ
ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻲﺍﺛﺮ ﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ) .ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ( ﺧﺼﺎﻳﺺ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﭘﺬﻳﺮﻓﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ
ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ،ﺁﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎﻱ ﺷﻔﺎﻓﻴﺖ ﺍﻻﻫﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺟﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻫﻲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﺸﻤﻮﻝ ﺧﻼﺻﻲ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺟﺪﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ
ﻭ ﻳﻜﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﻼﺹ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻋﻬﺪﻩﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺧﻼﺻﻲ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
***
۲۰٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻴﻦﻫﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ) .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﭘﺎﻓﺸﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺩﺏ ،ﻭ ﺳﺎﺯﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺒﻘﺎﺕ ﺭﺷﺪﻧﻴﺎﻓﺘﻪﺗﺮ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ،
ﺁﺳﺎﻧﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺗﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺒﺮﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﭘﺮ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ( .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﺯ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﻓﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺳﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻗﻴﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ!..
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﺪ :ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﻘﻴﺎﺩ
ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮﻧﺪ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﺫﺍﺗﻲ
ﺑﺎ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
ﻓﺮﺩﻳﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ،ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ)ﺑﻪﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ( ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻉ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺗﻠﻨﺒﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﻲﺍﺭﺍﺩﮔﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﻲﻫﺪﻑ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﺎﺕ ﻳﺎ
ﺗﻪﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺷﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻣﻘﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺸﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻢ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﭘﮋﻭﺍﻙ
۲۰٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺭﺍﻙ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺩﻳﻦ )ﻭﺍﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ( ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻓﺘﺨﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﺩﺭ "ﺳﺨﻦ ﻳﻚ ﻋﺎﺷﻖ" ﺭﻭﻻﻥ ﺑﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ" :ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺴﺖ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﻭﺳﻮﺳﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﻮﺩ :ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎً
ﺑﻲﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ" ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻧﻪ ﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻑ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً
ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﻧﻮﻳﺴﺪ" :ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﻲﺩﺍﻥ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﻲ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﻗﻄﺮﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻴﻞ ﺧﺮﻭﺷﺎﻥ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ -ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ،ﻓﻠﺴﻔﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻃﻲ ،ﻛﻪ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺶ ،ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻭﻧﻲ ِ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺘﺰﻟﺰﻝ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ )ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ( .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ،ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻣﻴﻞ
ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮﻱ ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﮔﺮﻳﺨﺖ .ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱﺗﺮﻱ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱﺗﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺍﻟﻔﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺭﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﻭﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ )ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻳﺎ
۲۰۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ( ﻭ ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ )ﺷﺎﻧﺲ( ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ .ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﻲ ،ﮔﺴﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﻳﺎ
ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻳﺰﻭﻡ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﻠﻖ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﺼﺮﻱ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺴﺴﺘﮕﻲﻫﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﻲ
ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﺑﻲﻫﻴﭻ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻌﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻳﻲ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ.
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ "ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ" ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ
)ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ( ﺑﻪ ﺧﺼﻮﺹ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻓﺎﺩﻩ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻓﺴﺘﻴﻮﺍﻟﻬﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﻏﺎﻣﻀﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩﻫﺎ
ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ؟ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﻳﺎﻭﻩ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﺩﺍﺏ
ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﺤﺮ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻣﺎً ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﻜﺎﺭﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺤﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﻳﻔﺘﻦ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺖ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﺪﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺤﺮ
ﻗﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﺗﻼﺵ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺭﻭﻳﮕﺮﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺤﺮ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻲ .ﺗﺼﺎﻋﺪﻱ
ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻭﺍﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻲﻛﺮﺍﻥ .ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ
ﺑﺮ ﺳﺤﺮ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻀﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺰﺵ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻﺟﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺧﻄﻲ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻟﻲ
۲۰۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ -ﺭﻭﺵ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻬﻢ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ -ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﺒﻴﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺷﻜﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺤﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻮﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺮﻩ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺗﻘﻠﺐ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪﻭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﭘﻮﭺ ﻭ ﻳﺎﻭﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻗﻤﺎﺭﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺑﺪﻓﻬﻤﻲ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ :ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺷﺨﺼﻲ .ﺩﺭ ﺳﺤﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺗﻼﺵ
ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻞ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ
ﺣﻜﻢ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﺪ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﺩﻋﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﻗﻤﺎﺭﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺣﻘﻪﺯﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻲ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺁﻥ
ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺨﺺ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﺘﺎً ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﺨﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎﻫﻴﺖ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ۴۵ﺩﺭ ﻗﻤﺎﺭﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺍﺯ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﺶ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ )ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ( ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ،ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﻭ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ
ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﭘﻮﻝ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ.
۲۰۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺭﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ،ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﭘﻮﻝ ،ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ،ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﺘﺤﻤﻞ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﺳﺖ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻧﺪ.
***
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻏﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ "ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ" ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ
ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻧﻬﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻤﻨﻮﻋﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﻄﻮﻃﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ،ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺭﻋﺎﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻛﻪ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﻔﺎﺗﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻲﺣﺮﻣﺘﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ )ﻳﺎ
ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ( ،ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ
ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ،ﻭﻱ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ "ﺩﻭﺋﻞ" ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ
ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻜﺎﻓﺎﺗﻲ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺘﺶ ﺑﺎ
ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ،ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻭ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ )ﺗﻨﻬﺎ( ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ
۲۱۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ
ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ،ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻﺕ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡ )ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ( ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ
ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻳﺶ .ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺳﺘﻘﻼﻟﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺲ
ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﺵﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﻘﺪﺱ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻣﺘﻘﻠﺐ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺨﺘﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ،
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭ ﺻﻠﺐ ﺻﻼﺣﻴﺖ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺍﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﻘﻮﻁ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻱ ﻫﻢ ﺩﻟﺘﻨﮓ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﻫﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺘﻴﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ
ﻓﻘﻂ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻬﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﻱ ﺗﻘﻠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ -ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺩﻭﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺮﻱ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻀﻤﻮﻥ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻌﻘﻴﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ" :ﻳﻚ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺑﻔﺮﺳﺘﻴﺪ ! ﺩﻩ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺟﺎﻳﺰﻩ
ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ ".ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻮﻝ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺑﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻻﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ
ﺩﺍﺭﻡ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻻﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﻓﺮﺳﺘﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻭﻱ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪ
۲۱۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﻌﺠﺰﻩﺁﺳﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻣﻲﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻚ ﺑﻠﻮﻑ .ﻭﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ....ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﺴﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻻﺭ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﻓﺮﺳﺘﻨﺪ؟ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﺎً ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﻮﻝ ﺩﻩ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻌﺒﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﻨﺎﻗﻲ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺷﻮﺩ) .ﺩﻩ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ ﭘﺴﺖ( ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ
ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻋﻼﻣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﻄﺎﻑ ﺍﻟﻬﻲ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺧﺪﺍ؟ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﮔﻬﻲ ﺭﺍ
ﭼﺎﭖ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ(
ﺍﮔﺮ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻧﻜﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻱ ﻣﺒﻬﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻦ ﺩﺍﺩ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﻪ :ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺑﺨﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﻭ ﺗﺒﺮﺋﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﻃﺮﺩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﻣﺠﺎﺯﺍﺕ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺖ ﭘﻮﭺ ﻳﻚ ﺍﮔﻬﻲ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻲ ﻓﺪﺍﻛﺎﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺷﮕﺮﻑ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﺷﻮﺩ" :ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ".ﻣﻦ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ
ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻢ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻲ ﻧﺸﻨﻴﺪﻡ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻡ .ﻭ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
۲۱۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﺣﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﺑﻠﻮﻑﺯﺩﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻳﺎ
ﻋﺪﻡ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺎﻧﺘﺎ ﻛﻠﻮﺱ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﭘﻮﭺ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺵ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ،ﻏﺮﻳﺰﻩ ،ﺭﺍﻧﺶ ،ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻨﺎ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﻪ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺑﻨﺎ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺗﻌﻤﻖ ﻣﺴﺘﺪﻝ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺑﺮ ﻫﺴﺘﻲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ )ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻻﺭ(
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ -ﺟﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺣﺚ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ .ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ :ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ،ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﻨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺧﺪﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ )ﺧﺪﺍ( ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﻲﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖ ،ﺑﻲﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﻭ ﺗﻪﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﭼﻴﺪﻩﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺮ
ﺳﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻥ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺟﺰ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﺣﻤﺘﺶ ﺻﺪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﺎﺕ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ،ﻛﻞ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
۲۱۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ،ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻣﺘﻌﻬﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ
ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩ ،ﺑﺎ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺗﻌﻬﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺍﺷﺒﺎﻉ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ) (Contractualﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ
ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺪﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ :ﺧﺪﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ )ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮔﺶ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﻫﺪ( ۴۶ﻭ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ
ﻣﻴﺪﻫﺪ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻭ) .ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﺬﻛﺮ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻡ (( .ﻓﺮﺩ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺁﺭﺯﻭ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻭ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻴﺰ
ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻟﻲ ،ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﻋﺎﺷﻘﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﻢ؟ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ
ﭘﻮﭺ ﻭ ﻋﺒﺚ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭼﺮﺧﻪ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺳﺖ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻣﻮﺛﺮﺗﺮ ﻭ
ﻣﺠﺬﻭﺏﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭘﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻳﺸﻬﺎﻱ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﺪﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ -ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ
۲۱٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻛﻞ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺧﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺪﺍﻱ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺁﻥ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖﺩﺍﺩﻥ
ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ .ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻜﻦ ،ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻣﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺘﺨﺎﺻﻢ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ .ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﮕﺮ ﻭ ﻃﺮﻑ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻓﺮﺽ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲﺍﺵ ،ﻫﺮﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺝ ﻭ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﺴﻤﻲ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ
ﻣﺤﺾ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ )ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ( ﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻑ ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺍﺳﺖ.
) (GNAﺧﻼﺻﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺕ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻴﺎﺕ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻟﻮﻫﻴﺘﻲ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ
ﺩﻧﻴﻮﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ .ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﭼﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻼﺷﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺧﻨﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﭼﻴﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺁﺯﺍﺩ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦﻃﺮﻳﻖ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﺍً ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﺭ ،ﺧﻮﺵ ﻳﻤﻦ ،ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ ،ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ
۲۱٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻫﻮﻡ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺣﺎﻃﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻳﺪ
ﺣﻘﺎﺭﺕﺁﻣﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻧﮕﺮﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎﻣﻦ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺗﻮﻟﺪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺳﺮﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﺮﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪﻩ) ،ﻳﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﺎﺯﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻭﻳﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﻧﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻟﻮ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ( ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﻓﻮﺭﻣﻮﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ،ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻱ ﺧﺮﮔﻮﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻴﺐ ﻛﺖ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ
ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺩﺭﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﻓﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺎﻓﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻓﻘﻂ
ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ
ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﻮﺩ :ﺍﻋﺪﺍﺩ ،ﺣﺮﻭﻑ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻨﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻮﺯﻳﻊ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ،ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ
ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﮔﺴﺴﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﮕﺎﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻩﻫﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ
ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭ
ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻓﻬﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ
۲۱٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﻴﺰﺵ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ
ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ )ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ( ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻃﺮﻓﻲ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ
ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ،ﻭ ﺩﻋﻮﺕﻫﺎ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﮊﻳﻠﻮ ﺩﻟﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ
ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﻫﻴﺠﺎﻥ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﺍً ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻭ ﭘﻲﺭﻓﺖ )ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ( ﻫﺮﮔﺰ -ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ -ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ) .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭘﻲﺭﻓﺖﻫﺎ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
ﺻﺤﺒﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ (.ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﻣﺤﺘﻤﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻲﺭﻓﺘﻬﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ ﻣﻔﺮﻭﺽ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﻱ
ﭘﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﻣﻔﺮﻭﺽ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ -ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ
»ﻣﻄﻠﻖ« ﺭﺍ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﭼﻪ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻗﻮﻱﺗﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ،ﺭﺍﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺘﺮﺍﻕﻫﺎﻱ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﭘﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﻢ؛ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﻪ ﻟﺠﺎﻡﮔﺴﻴﺨﺘﻪﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺩﺍﻳﻤﻮﻥ )ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺎﻃﻴﺮ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎﺳﺘﺎﻥ )ﻡ(( ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺳﻮ ﻣﻲﻭﺯﺩ ،ﺩﻣﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﻧﺪﻛﻲ ﻧﺎﻗﻄﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﻣﻨﻀﺒﻂ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ.
۲۱۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﻪﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﭼﺮﻧﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ».ﺷﺪﻥ« ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪﻱ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﻢ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﺎ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺮﺧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻳﻨﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ
ﺧﻴﺮ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ "ﺷﺪﻥ" ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻋﻮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺶ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ" :ﺟﺎﻧﺐﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺛﺎﻧﻮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ) ".ﻟﻴﻮﺗﺎﺭ( ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﻳﺶ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪﺗﺮ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ )ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻘﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﻴﺪﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺤﻠﻮﻝ ﺷﻴﻤﻴﺎﻳﻲ
ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ( ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ »ﺷﺪﻥ« ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺤﻲ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻱ
ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻐﺸﻮﺵ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻣﻲﺑﻨﺪﺩ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﻤﺎﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻬﺎ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﭼﺮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﻨﮕﺮﻳﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ،ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺛﺒﺎﺕ ،ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺑﻲﺭﻭﺡ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺪﻳﺸﺪ ،ﻓﺮﺽ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻳﺎ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺻﻮﺭﻱ ﻋﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ،
ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ -ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﻉ
ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺰﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ -ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ
ﻧﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﺣﻤﻘﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻩ ﺷﻜﺴﺖﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ
۲۱۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﺷﻜﻮﻩ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺽ ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﭘﺲ
ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﺲﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ﻧﻈﻢ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺟﺒﺮﻱ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻋﻠﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻴﺘﺶ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ
ﺑﻼﺷﺮﻃﺶ ﻫﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ "ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ" ﺩﻟﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻱ ﭘﺲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻱ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺑﻪ
ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻧﺎﭼﻴﺰ ﻭ ﻭﻗﻴﺤﺎﻧﻪ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻧﺎﭼﻴﺰﻱﺍﺵ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ "ﺷﺪﻥ" ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻪﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﻮﺩﻣﺎﺩﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ.
ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ -ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ -ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻲﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻜﻞ ﺻﺤﻴﺢ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺻﻮﻟﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﺪﺍﻉ ﺳﺮﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ )ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﻋﻠﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﻞ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻏﻠﺒﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ
ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﺖ( ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ )ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ
ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﻪ(
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱﺍﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻫﺮﺍﻛﻠﻴﺘﻮﺱ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ( ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ
۲۱۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭼﻨﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺮ ﭘﻲﺭﻓﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺧﻄﻲ
ﺩﻭ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻧﻮﻉ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ،ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺭﻭﺡ -
ﻛﻪ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ،ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻﺕ
ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﻇﺮﻳﻒ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻋﻠﻴﺘﻲ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺏ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻥ ،ﺗﺮﺍﮊﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻋﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﻣﺴﻴﺮﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ،ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺍﺟﺒﺎﺭﻱ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﺗﺎﺱﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺮﻗﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﻖ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﭘﺪﻳﺪﺍﺭ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻨﺎً
ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﻢ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ
ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺳﺘﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ )ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ( ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻥ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻟﺬﺕ
ﺑﺮﻳﻢ.
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ :ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺗﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻻ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻦ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﻏﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﻚ
۲۲۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﻭﺟﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻠﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ -ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺩﺍﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺳﻴﺮ
ﺗﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ ..ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻄﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ،
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺭﻃﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺘﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ )ﺗﺎﺱ( ﻓﻘﻂ
ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﻣﻼﻳﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ -ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻬﺪﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ
ﭼﻨﮓ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ -ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﺗﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﺷﻮﺭﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ،ﭘﺲ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﻫﻮﺱﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺧﻴﺎﻻﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻞ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺗﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ
ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻑﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺰﺭﮔﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﺳﺖ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﺍﺕ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﻱ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺘﺒﻠﻮﺭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ
ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺱ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻟﺬﺕ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻲﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ
۲۲۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﻧﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻣﺤﻀﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺷﺖ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ.
ﺑﺎﺯﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎً ﺍﺯ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ
ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺎﺳﺖ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﺍﺕ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﺁﻧﺘﺮﻭﭘﻴﻜﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ
ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺍﺳﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﺠﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺟﺬﺏ
ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ
ﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺬﺏ ﺩﺭ
ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ .ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﻣﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺌﺎﺗﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ،ﻫﺮ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺗﻲ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ
ﻣﺤﺾ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺮﺝ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺟﻲ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ
ﻋﻠﻴﺖ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؛ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﻧﻪ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻩ ﺧﻄﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﮔﺴﺴﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻫﺎ ) ﻛﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺭﻭﻣﺎﻧﺘﻴﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﻋﻠﻴﺘﻲ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ( ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺯﻧﺠﻴﺮﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ
ﻭ ﺳﺮﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﺻﺮﻓﻪﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺣﻠﻘﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺍﻟﻨﮕﻮﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﭘﻠﻲﻧﺰﻱﻫﺎ .ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﻟﺘﺰﺍﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺯﻭﺭ،
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﻭ ﻛﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻗﻴﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ
۲۲۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻧﻮﻣﺎﺩﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺩﻟﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ "ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﺶ" ۴۷ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻧﻔﺼﺎﻝ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻲ
ﻋﻠﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺧﻄﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪﺵ
ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺗﻮﭘﻴﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻟﻴﺰﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻩﺭﻭﻱ ﻭ ﺳﻬﻞﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭﻱ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺟﺪﺍﻛﺮﺩﻩ -ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺕ
ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻻﺕ -ﻭ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﺎﻣﻌﻠﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺗﻜﻠﻴﻔﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ
ﺑﻲﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
ﺭﺧﺪﺍﺩ ﺳﺮﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺷﻤﺎﺭ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺳﺮﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ؟ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻳﻚ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻭﻧﻲ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻓﻴﺰﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ
ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻳﻚ »ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ« ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ
ﻫﺮ ﻧﻘﺼﻲ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ " ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ" ﻭ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺳﻮﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻣﻴﻞ.
ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﺎﻗﻀﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺳﻠﺒﻴﺖ ﺩﻭﺭﻧﻲ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻨﺪﻳﺪ .ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻫﺠﻮ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼً ﻛﻞ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥﺩﻫﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﮔﻲ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪﺍﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻋﻤﻞ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺨﺮﻳﺐ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺑﺎﻃﻞﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻓﻨﺎﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻛﻨﺶ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻛﻨﺸﻲ
-ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺤﺾ -ﻭ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻗﻴﻮﺩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺟﺰ
۲۲۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﻴﻊ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﺨﺘﮕﻴﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻘﻮﺍﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻭ ﭘﻮﭼﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻴﻢ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺒﺘﺮ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺴﺎﺑﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻤﺰﺩﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﻴﻦ
ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﺮﻁ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﻧﺪﻩﺷﻮﺩ )ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ
ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻟﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻲ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ؟ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺘﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺨﺖ
)ﺧﻮﺏ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺪ( ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻩ ،ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ،ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﻋﺪﺍﻟﺖ؟ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪﺍﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ؟
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ " ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ" ﻧﻘﻴﻀﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺭﺧﺲ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ "ﻻﺗﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺑﻞ" ۴۸ﺑﺎ
ﺁﻥ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺷﻮﻡ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻳﺰ ﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ؟
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎﻱ )ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ(
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﻭ ﺑﻠﻌﻴﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺧﺸﻦ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻌﺪﺍً "ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ" ﺳﺮ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺷﺪ «.ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻓﺮﻡ :ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻴﻂ
ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﺷﻤﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﺒﺘﺮ« ﻛﻪ ﻗﺮﻋﻪﻛﺸﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻠﻴﻂﻫﺎ ﺗﺎﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﺮﺩ
ﺩﺭﭘﻲﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩ :ﻫﺮﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺖ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺎﺑﻠﻲ ﺳﺮﺍﻳﺖ
۲۲٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ "ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ،ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﮕﺎﻧﻲ" ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻠﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﺨﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻭ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺛﺮﻭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺠﻮﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻧﻲ
ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻱ ﻗﻄﻊ ﻋﻀﻮ ﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ
ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ،ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ "ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ".ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺧﻄﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻌﺒﺘﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺸﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺣﻴﻠﻪ ﻣﻜﺮ ﻭ
ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﻮﺩ :ﭼﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﺘﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺷﺎﻧﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ
ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻫﻴﭽﻜﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺘﻬﺎ .ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺣﺎﻃﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ،
ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻻﺗﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻝ ﺁﻥ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺵ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
"ﺍﻣﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ" ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﺮﻛﺖ ﺷﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ
***
ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻓﺮﺽ
۲۲٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﻲﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ.
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻲﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎﺭﭘﻴﭻ
ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺭﻭﺩ ﺍﮔﺎﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦﺟﺎ ﺟﺴﺖ:
ﺩﺭ ﻋﺪﻡ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺎﻗﻄﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮ ﺑﻲﻧﻈﻤﻲ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺎ
)ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ( .ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ -ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﺑﻲﺭﻭﺡ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ -
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻮﺭﻱ ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ "ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ" ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ"ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ" ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﻭﻗﺎﻳﻊ "ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ" ﺍﺵ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ )ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ
ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺘﺎﻓﻴﺰﻳﻚ ﻋﻠﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ( ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﻧﺎﻗﻄﻌﻴﺖ ،ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ
ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻻﺗﺎﺭﻱ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺭﺧﺲ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ
ﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻭﻫﻢﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﻱ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﺶ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﺎ
ﻣﻲﮔﺮﻳﺰﺩ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ،ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻻﺗﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﺎﺑﻠﻴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ .ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻴﺮ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﻧﺎﻗﻄﻌﻴﺘﻲ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻓﻜﻨﺪﻩ ﺣﺘﻤﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺁﻥ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺎ
ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎﻳﻴﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ
۲۲٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪﺷﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ
ﺍﺑﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺭﺧﺲ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﺑﻨﺎ
ﻣﻲﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ .ﺍﻭ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ..ﻛﻞ ﺷﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺎﻗﻌﻄﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻗﻌﻄﻲ
ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻧﻪ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻴﺖ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ ،ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺟﺒﺮﮔﺮﺍﻳﻲ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻛﻪ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﻗﻄﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ
ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺤﺮﻛﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺳﻲ ﺭﺥ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ )ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪ ﺁﻧﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﺘﻨﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺿﺎ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﻛﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻌﻬﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺍﺧﺘﻴﺎﺭﻱ )ﻻﺗﺎﺭﻱ( ﺍﻣﺮ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺩﺭ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ )ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ( ﺷﻜﻮﻓﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ
۲۲۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻧﻮﺳﺘﺎﻟﻮﮊﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻮﺍﻣﻊ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻴﺜﺎﻗﻲ ﻭ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻱ ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ،ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺘﻤﺮﮔﻲ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺟﺬﺍﺑﺘﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻋﻤﻴﻘﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻏﻮﻃﻪ ﻭﺭﻳﻢ .ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺭﺧﺲ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻔﮕﺮ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﺸﻴﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﺑﻴﺰﺍﻧﺲ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ,ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ,ﻭ ﺳﻠﺴﻠﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﻭ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺐ ﺩﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﺳﺒﻬﺎ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﻁﻛﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺰﺍﻧﺴﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺐﺩﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻋﻼﺋﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﺎ
ﻭ ﺗﺴﺮﻳﻊ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﻛﺎﻻﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
۴۹ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ،ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲﻫﺎ ،ﻭ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ jogo de bicho ﺑﺮﺯﻳﻞ ﺟﺎﮔﻮ ﺩﻱ ﺑﻴﺠﻮ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﻋﻈﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺸﻐﻮﻝ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻣﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺟﻨﻮﻥ ﻋﻘﺐﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻲ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ
ﺁﻥ ،ﭘﮋﻭﺍﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﻮﺩﻳﻚ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻓﺮﻣﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﻐﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﺮﺏ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻘﺐﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﻲ؟ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﻤﺘﺎﺯ ،ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ
ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﺮﻓﻴﻊ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ - ،ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ
۲۲۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻲﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻨﻄﻮﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﺯﻭﻱ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺮﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻲﭘﺮﻭﺍﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ.
۲۲۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﭘﻮﭺ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ ﻛﻬﻦ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻨﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺒﮕﻮﻳﻲ؟ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻣﺤﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺣﺸﺎ ﺟﻮﺟﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﻧﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺗﻔﺴﻴﺮ ﻫﺮﭼﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺗﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؟ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺭﺧﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ
ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺩﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﻮﺭﺧﺲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﻭ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻄﺮﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﺍﺕ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺗﻌﺒﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ
ﺑﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻣﺎ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
۲۳۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﻣﺮﮒﮔﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺭﺍﻡ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎﺑﻠﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﮕﻲ ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ
ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ .ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺪﻩ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﭼﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﺻﻔﺮ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ .ﺣﺘﻲ ﺧﺪﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﻨﺰﻟﻲ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﻧﺸﺪﻩﺑﻮﺩ .ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺸﺖﻭﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺁﻥ،
ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻜﻮﻻﺭﻳﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺑﻲﺧﺎﺻﻴﺖ ،ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ
۲۳۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺰﻭﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺪﺍﻛﺜﺮ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺩ .ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ،
ﻗﻄﺒﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﭼﺸﻢ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺑﻲﺍﺛﺮ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻧﺪ،
ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻠﻲ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺟﺬﺏ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ
ﺷﻜﻞﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲﺍﻧﺪ -ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺷﺮﻭﻁ ﻓﺮﺍﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ .ﻧﻪ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ
ﻭﺭﺍﺭﻭﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻪ ﺗﺮﺍﮊﻳﻚ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺑﺮﻳﻢ،
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻣﺪﻟﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻧﺮﻡﻫﺎ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻲ ،ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻤﺎﺕ ،ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎ،
ﭘﻲﺭﻓﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋﻲ ...ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ،ﺩﺭﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻟﻬﺎ،
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻗﻄﺒﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ
ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻗﻤﻲ )ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ -ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ
۲۳۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺎﻃﻊ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ،ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻨﺶ )ﺗﻦﺑﻪﺗﻨﻲ ،ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ
۲۳۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺪﻟﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻬﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺷﺎﻥ ،ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻪ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ۵۰ Ludicﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺁﻓﺮﻳﺪﻩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ،ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺿﺪ -ﻣﻼﻙ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﻧﮕﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻧﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻘﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻮﮊ ،ﺧﻤﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ،ﺍﺻﻞ
ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻮﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻟﻬﺎ )ﻱ
ﺍﺯ "ﺑﺎﺯﻱ" ﻣﺪﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺷﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﺎً ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻝ Ludic
ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻡ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻗﻄﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﭘﺲ( ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺕ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ
ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ )ﺑﺎﺯﻱ( ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺖ
ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺣﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻳﻒ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ،ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ
ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ،ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﮔﻬﻲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺮﺳﻨﺠﻲﻫﺎ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻣﺪﻟﻬﺎﻱ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﺟﻠﺐ ﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﻨﻈﺮ ﺁﻳﻨﺪ .ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ )ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮﻣﻴﻦ ﻭ ﭼﻬﺎﺭﻣﻴﻦ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝ ﻫﻢ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ؟( ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﺨﺺ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ Ludic ﺑﺎ ﻫﺸﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺳﻪ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻋﻮﺽ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻟﻬﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﻫﻢ ﺁﻣﻴﺨﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻖ ﻣﻮﻧﺘﺎﮊﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ )ﺍﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺗﻲﻭﻱﮔﻴﻢ ،ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍ ،ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﭘﮋﻭﺍﻛﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﻜﺎﺭﮔﻴﺮﻱ Ludicﺍﺯ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ( ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ،ﻣﻨﺒﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲfascination ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺭﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻋﻮﺽ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ Ludicﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻌﺎﺩﻝ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺘﻪ ﺷﻮﺩ Ludic .ﺑﺎ ﺭﻏﺒﺘﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ِ ﻛﺎﺭﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲ ،ﺑﺮ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺵ ﻛﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ ،ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱﺷﺎﻥ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺮ Ludicﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻭﺷﻬﺎﻱ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺁﻟﺘﺮﻧﺎﺗﻴﻮﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻒ
۲۳٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻣﺎ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻓﺮﻭﻛﺎﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ -ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ِ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱِ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺗﻄﻬﻴﺮ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺧﻼﻗﻴﺖ .ﺳﺮﺗﺎﺳﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺵ ﻭ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺑﻪ "ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻱ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ" ﻳﺎ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻭ
ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻟﺬﺕ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ :ﭼﻴﺮﮔﻲ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﻮﺯﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺟﺸﻨﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﭘﻴﭽﻲ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﻱ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻲﻏﺮﺿﻲ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ،
ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺷﻜﻞ ﺗﺼﻌﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ،ﻓﻦ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻲ ﺁﻣﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﺶ ﺗﻬﻲ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﺎ،
ﻭﺭﺯﺵ ،ﺣﺮﻓﻪ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻟﻲ ،ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺑﻬﺪﺍﺷﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﺎﺩﻝ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺷﺘﻴﺎﻕ ﺑﻪ ﻭﻫﻤﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ
ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻼﺷﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻱ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺯﻳﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺳﺎﺯﻳﻢ
Ludic ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻬﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺟﺬﺏ ﺳﺎﻳﺒﺮﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ )ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ( ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
***
ﺗﻜﺎﻣﻞ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎ ﺭﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺭﻗﺎﺑﺘﻲ ،ﻭﺭﺯﺷﻬﺎﻱ ﺗﻴﻤﻲ،
ﻭﺭﻕﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻴﺰ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺩﺳﺘﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺗﺎ ﻧﺴﻞ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﻦﺑﺎﻝ )ﻛﻪ
ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﺮﺩﻱ )ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ( ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺁﻣﻴﺰﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺗﻬﺎﻱ ﺩﺳﺘﻲ ﻭ
۲۳٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲﺍﻧﺪ( ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻨﻴﺲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﭙﻴﻮﺗﺮﻱ )ﻛﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ
ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ( ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﺍﺗﻤﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻟﺰﻭﻡ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ،ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ "ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺳﺎﻳﻞ ﺳﻤﻌﻲ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ،ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺧﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ Ludic .ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻳﻚ
ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ Ludicﺍﺳﺖ :ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺣﺴﻲ
ﻭ ﭘﻨﻞ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﻋﺼﺒﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺨﺪﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻼﻳﻢﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺲ
ﺣﺘﻲ ﻛﺪ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﺧﺮﺩ ،ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﻱ ﺗﻠﻪ
ﺍﻭﻧﻮﻣﻴﻚ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲ ﻛﺪ ،ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮﻳﺘﻪ ﻛﺪ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻱ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺯ
ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺒﻲ ،ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻭ Ludicﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺣﺎﻃﻪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺳﻮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﭼﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ
ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ...ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻨﻞ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭﺭﺍﻱ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ
ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻳﻜﻲ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻧﻪ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻳﻲ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﻫﻤﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ .ﻗﻀﻴﻪ
۲۳۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﻛﺪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺻﺪﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺍﺳﺘﺮﻳﻮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺳﻴﻘﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﻧﻮﺳﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﻄﺮﻧﺞ ﻛﺎﻣﭙﻴﻮﺗﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳﺪ .ﻛﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺷﻄﺮﻧﺞ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻟﺬﺕ
ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﭙﻴﻮﺗﺮﻫﺎ؟ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ .Ludicﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺻﺎﺩﻕ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻜﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
)ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﻓﻮﺗﺒﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﭘﺨﺶﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ -ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺍﻍ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺭﮊ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺳﻲ ﺁﻥ ﻻﻑﺯﻧﻴﻬﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺎﺩﻣﺎﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻻﻣﺴﻪﺍﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻔﻴﻖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ،ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ،
ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺁﻫﺴﺘﻪ ،ﺯﺍﻭﻳﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻭ ( ..ﻣﺴﺎﺑﻘﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻩﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ،ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻱ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻫﺎﻟﻮﻛﺎﺳﺖ) ۵۱ﻗﺘﻞ ﻋﺎﻡ( ﻳﺎ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﻭ ﻛﻪ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺭﻭﺩ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺭﻧﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺨﺘﻲ ﻭ
ﺁﻫﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﺭﻧﮓ
ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮊﻭﺭﻧﺎﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻭﻳﺘﻨﺎﻡ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺕ
ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﻧﮓﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻨﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﺁﻭﺭﻱ ،ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺰﺩ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ،
۲۳۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﻬﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺗﺎﻕ ﮔﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻛﻮﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺩﻡﺳﻮﺯﻱ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻴﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ
ﺻﺪﺍ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺭﻳﻜﻪ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ،ﺑﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﺩﻳﻚ ﻭ ﺭﻳﺰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪﻩﻫﺎ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻲﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪﮔﻲ،
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ )ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ -ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪ ﻛﻤﺎﻝ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﻌﺎﺩ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻳﻪﻫﺎ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ) .ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﮔﻨﺎﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻴﺖ -ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ "ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪﭼﻴﺰ ﺧﺒﺮﺩﺍﺭ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ".ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻟﺮﺯﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ -ﻳﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻛﻪ »ﺁﻥ« ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ
ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺷﻚ ﺩﻓﻊ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺥ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ
ﻭ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﻋﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺳﻨﮕﻴﻦ ﺁﺷﻮﻳﺘﺰ ﺑﺎ
ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ ﺑﺮﻫﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻫﻮﻟﻮﻛﺎﺳﺖ ،ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰ ،ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻣﻚﻟﻮﻫﺎﻥ
ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩ( ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺗﻼﺷﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﮔﺮﻣﻲ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﺗﺮﺍﮊﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺎ )ﺧﻮﺩ( ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ
ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ ،ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﺳﺮﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ،
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ،ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ) .ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﺟﻨﮓ
ﺳﺮﺩ ﻭ (...ﻭ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻠﺘﺰﻡ
ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﺳﺮﻛﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻭ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺩﻟﺴﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ( ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺳﺮﺩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺕ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﻳﻠﻨﺪ
ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺭﺗﻌﺎﺷﻲ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻻﻣﺴﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﻣﺎ ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻬﺎ ،ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻮﺯﺷﻲ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎ
)ﻱ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻪﺷﺪﻩ( ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺎﻗﺪ ﺁﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺪﻫﻨﺪ .ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻭﺣﺸﺖ
ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﻋﺎﻣﻼﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺁﻥ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
۲٤۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻗﻴﺎﻡ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻄﺮﻱ ﻭﺍﮔﻴﺮﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻤﻨﺎﻋﺖ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺑﺮﻋﻜﺲ ﺑﻮﺩ :ﺧﻄﺮ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺳﻜﻮﻥ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻓﺮﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺮﺩﻱ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ
ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺗﺎ )ﮔﺮﻣﻲ( ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ،
ﺑﺎﺯﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺣﺮﺍﺭﺗﻲ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﮕﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﻣﻲ
ﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ )ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ( ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻜﻤﻴﻠﻲ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ )ﺑﻪ ﺟﺰ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ( ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺴﻂ ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﺳﺖ:
ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺫﻛﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﺳﻨﺠﻲﻫﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻮﻓﻘﻴﺖ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
***
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﺭ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻲﺿﺮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ
ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻛﻮﺩﻛﺎﻥ( ﺑﻲﺿﺮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﺭﺍ )ﺑﻪ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺐ -ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻴﻨﻤﺎ
ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ )ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻓﺰﺍﻳﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺁﻟﻮﺩﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ (.ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺯ
ﻣﻮﻫﺒﺖ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ -ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﺍﺯ
ﻓﻴﻠﻢ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻳﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﺼﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ
ﺗﺸﺎﺑﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﻳﻒ ،ﻳﻚ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ،ﻳﻚ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﺎ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻨﻬﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻫﻴﭙﻨﻮﺗﻴﺰﻡ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻓﻘﻂ
۲٤۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻲﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻐﺰ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ) .ﺷﻤﺎ
ﭘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ( ﻫﻤﻪ ﻋﺼﺒﻬﺎﻱ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﺰﻳﺴﺘﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ Ludicﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻱ " ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﻲ" ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ .ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺩ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﻬﺎ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﺎﺻﺮﻩ ﺍﺩﻭﺍﺗﺸﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺰﻭﻱ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ .ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻮﺳﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺣﺘﻲ
ﻭ ﺟﻬﺶ ﻣﺘﺪﺍﺧﻞ ﻟﻴﺒﻴﻨﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﺑﻪ Ludic ﻛﺎﻣﻼ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺗﺨﻠﻔﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺍﺵ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻲ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ
ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺶ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺣﻮﺍﺱ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻠﻤﺮﻭ Ludicﺑﺎ ﻣﻜﺎﻥﺳﻨﺠﻲ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ
ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩﻩﻱ ﻟﺬﺕ )ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﻭﻩ( ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﺟﺰء ﻣﺤﺮﻙ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ
ﭼﻨﺪﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺎ ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ »ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ« ﻣﻴﻨﻴﺎﺗﻮﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﻋﻮﺕ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻳﻢ .ﺧﺮﺩ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻇﺮﻓﻴﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻧﺮﻡ Ludic ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ
ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ،ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻬﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻧﺶ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺛﺎﺑﺖ،
ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﻬﻤﻴﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﺍﺗﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
۲٤۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺳﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﺁﺷﻨﺎﻳﻴﻢ .ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺎﺕ ،ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻔﻨﻲ،
ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ ،ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ".ﻭ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﻋﻘﺎﻳﺪ ،ﻗﻠﺐﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺫﻫﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﺪ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪ »ﺁﻥ« ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ .ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍﻱ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻲ ،ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﻫﻮﻣﻮﻓﺎﺗﻴﻚ ،۵۲ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ،ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻫﺠﻮﻡ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﺪﻭﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺴﺘﻌﻤﻌﻴﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻡ .ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﺧﺮﺝ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﻭﺣﺸﻴﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻴﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﻤﺎﻧﻌﺖ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ /ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ :ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﻛﺸﻒﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ "ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ" ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻧﻤﻲﭘﺬﻳﺮﺩ.
ﺍﺧﺒﺎﺭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ,ﻳﻚ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻮﻟﻮﮔﺮﺍﻡ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻌﻜﻮﺱ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻟﺴﺮﺩ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻲﻣﻴﻠﻲ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﻓﺮﻳﺐ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﺘﻘﺎﺩﻱ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ،ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﺮﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
۲٤۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺑﺮ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﻟﺤﺎﻕﻫﺎﻱ Ludicﺗﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺟﺎﺫﺑﻪ ﻻﻣﺴﻪﺍﻱ
ﺗﻠﻪ ﭘﺎﺗﻴﻚﻫﺎ" :ﺭﺍﺟﺮﺯ -ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﻱ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺭﻭ ﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ".ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﻣﺮﺍ
ﻣﻲﺷﻨﻮﻳﺪ؟ "ﺑﻠﻪ ﺻﺪﺍﺗﻮﻧﻮ ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ".ﺑﻔﺮﻣﺎﺋﻴﺪ ﺻﺪﺍﻱ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ" .ﺑﻠﻪ ،ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ".ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺟﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻮﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﺮﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ .ﻓﺮﺩ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؛ ﺍﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﭘﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﻭ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺻﻮﺭﻱ
ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﻓﺴﻜﻲ ۵۳ﺑﺎ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻼﻧﺰﻳﻦﻫﺎ ﻭ
ﺑﻌﺪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻳﺎﻛﻮﺑﺴﻦ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻭ ﺗﺸﺮﻳﺢ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻌﺪ
ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ ِﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺑﺴﻂ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺎﻟﻴﻨﻮﻓﺴﻜﻲ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻮﺩ :ﻣﺠﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻭﺋﻞ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ .ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻜﺎﻟﻤﺎﺕ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺣﺮﺍﻓﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﻣﺤﺘﻮﺍ،
ﺑﻮﻣﻴﺎﻥ )ﻣﻼﻧﺰﻱ( ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺸﻜﺶ ﻫﺪﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﻣﺤﺾ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ »ﺗﻤﺎﺱ« ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﺳﻲ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﺖ ﻳﺎﻛﻮﺑﺴﻦ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎﻱ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺵ ﺍﻳﺰﻭﻟﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ
ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻬﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
۲٤٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻳﺎﻛﻮﺑﺴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﻧﮕﺎﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ،ﻫﻤﺪﻭﺭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﻱ
ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺁﻏﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﮕﻮﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻮﻳﮋﻩ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ "ﭘﺎﺗﻴﻚ"
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ،ﺍﺑﺘﺬﺍﻟﻲ ﺧﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ".ﺍﮔﺮ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﭘﺲ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻛﺸﻒ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﭘﺎﺗﻴﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺰﺭﻳﻖ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ،
ﺗﺄﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺧﺴﺘﮕﻲﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ
ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺷﮕﻔﺖﺁﻭﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ.
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ( ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻮﺍﺻﻞ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ
ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﻈﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﺤﺒﺖ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ "ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ"
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻋﻼﺋﻢ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ
ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻔﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻫﺴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﺩﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻋﻼﻣﺖ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺭﺥ
ﺩﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﻭ ﻣﺘﻜﻠﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ) ،ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ
ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺼﺪﺍﻕ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ( ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﻌﻴﻨﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﻬﺎﻳﻲ ِ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ،ﻛﻞ ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﻳﺎﻛﻮﺑﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺟﺪﺍ
۲٤٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻋﺘﺒﺎﺭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﺩﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ.
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻗﻄﺒﻲﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻠﻬﺎﻱ
ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻛﻪ ﻇﻬﻮﺭ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ،ﻧﺤﻮ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﻫﺎ،
ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮﮒ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪ )ﺩﺍﻝ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻟﻮﻝ( ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﻡ )ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺳﺘﻨﺪﻩ( ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﻭﺗﺎﻳﻲ ۱/۰ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﻣﺘﻤﺎﻳﺰ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﻳﻚ "ﺑﻴﺖ" ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺵ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﭘﺎﻟﺲ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﺴﺖ .ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﺤﻮﻩ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ
ﺑﻲﺭﺣﻤﺎﻧﻪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺁﻧﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﺘﻘﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻠﻮﻧﺰﻱ
ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻛﻼﺳﻴﻚ )ﻳﺎﻛﻮﺑﺴﻦ( ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ
ﺁﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﻧﻤﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭﮔﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻭ ﻗﻄﺒﻴﺖ ﺍﺳﺘﺪﻻﻟﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻴﺘﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ .ﺍﺳﺘﻴﻼﻱ
ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ .ﺗﺮﻓﻴﻊ ﺳﺮﺩ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ )(mediaﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ )(mediumﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺗﻠﻪ :ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻨﺎﻝﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ" .ﺍﺗﻮ" :ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻨﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺗﻠﻪ
ﻭ ﺍﺗﻮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻠﻤﺎﺕ ﻣﺘﺼﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ )ﺑﺮﺍﺣﺘﻲ
ﭘﻴﺸﻮﻧﺪ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ )ﻡ(( ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻭﻳﺪﺋﻮﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺰﻳﻮﻧﻲ
۲٤٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺗﻤﺎﺷﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ (.ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﺭﺑﻴﻦ ﻭﻳﺪﺋﻮﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ،ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻟﺤﻈﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﺯﻭﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ -ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻋﺎﻟﻤﮕﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺸﺖ .ﺍﻳﺎﻟﺖ
ﻫﺮ ﻛﺴﻲ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻨﺠﺎﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺟﺰﺍﻱ ﮔﻤﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ
ﺑﺪﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻭﺭ ﻛﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺘﻲ ﺟﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﺑﺎﻧﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪﺍﺵ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﻐﻨﺎﻃﻴﺴﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻣﺤﺾ -ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﺎ ﺳﺌﻮﺍﻝﻫﺎ ،ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺪﻝﻫﺎ ،ﺻﻔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ،ﺷﺒﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻋﻈﻴﻤﺶ ،ﻭ ﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺤﺾﺷﺎﻥ ،ﺑﺴﺎﻭﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻋﻼﺋﻢ ،ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﻣﺤﺾ،
ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺗﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻨﺎﻝ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻣﻴﻨﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ
ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﻣﺎ ﭘﺨﺶ ﻭ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ /ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ،ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ،
ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ؟ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻧﻄﺒﺎﻕ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ(.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮊﺍﻥ ﻛﻮﺋﺮﺯﻭﻻ ۵۴ﺩﺭ :"le silicium fleur de peau " ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ
ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ -ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﻴﻮﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻚ ﻏﺮﻳﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻫﺮ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ
۲٤۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻳﻚ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻤﺖ ﺧﻂ ﺳﻴﺮ ﺭﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻟﻐﺰﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻓﺮﻭﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ -ﻧﺎﺭﻛﻮﺳﻴﺲ )ﺑﻲﺣﺴﻲ ( )ﻣﻚ ﻟﻮﻫﺎﻥ ﺗﻘﺮﻳﺒﺎً ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻝ ﺳﺨﻦ
ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ (:
"ﺑﻲﺣﺴﻲ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ :ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﭘﺴﻴﻦ ﺧﻄﺮ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ...ﻣﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺩﻳﭗ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﻴﻢ ...ﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎ ﻭ ﻟﺬﺗﻬﺎﻳﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺑﻲﺣﺴﻲ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﻲ
ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻼﻡ ،ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﻴﻠﻴﻜﻮﻥ ،ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ
ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ؟ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﺰﻭﺩﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻭﺩﻳﭗ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺩﺍﺭﻡ ﺧﺎﻃﺮﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﻡ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺯﻳﺴﺖﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﻮﻳﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺍﻭﺩﻳﭙﻲ ﻣﻲﻧﺎﻣﻴﻢ .ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺎﺷﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﮔﺸﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺪﺭ ﻏﺎﻳﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﺍﻧﮕﻲ،
ﺑﺎ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﺍﻗﻴﺎﻧﻮﺳﻲ ﻭ ﺭﺍﻧﺶ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻝ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺯﻣﺮﻩ ﺟﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﻤﻲ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ...ﻣﺎ
ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻗﻴﻮﺩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻃﺒﻖ )ﺍﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪ( ﺍﻭﺩﻳﭗ ﺩﺭﻙ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻱ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﭼﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ؟ ﺑﻌﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺗﻮﺭﻳﺘﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻧﻮﺑﺖ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؟"
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﺜﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦ "ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺯﻳﺴﺘﻲ" ۵۵ﻭ "ﺑﻲﺣﺴﻲ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﻲ" ،ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ :ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻭﺍﺳﻄﻪ "ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ" .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪﻩ ﻳﻚ
ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﻴﺎ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻤﻌﺪﺍﻧﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻠﻤﻪ ﺯﺩﻥ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ
ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺗﺒﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﮔﻴﺎﻫﻲ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻛﻮﺩﻙ ﻣﺘﻮﻟﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻠﻮﻝ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﭘﺪﺭ،ﻛﻮﺩﻙ
ﺭﻭﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﻟﺰ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻟﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻔﺖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﺵ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ).ﺩﻛﺘﺮ ﺭﻭﺭﻭﻳﻚ،۵۶
ﻫﺮ ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺴﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﻭﻳﮋﻩ ﺁﻥ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
۲٤۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻭ D.N.A ﻃﺮﺡﺍﻓﻜﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻛﺪ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲﺷﺎﻥ ،ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ -ﺩﺭ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﺑﻲﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻳﻜﻲ ﻭ "ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ" ﻓﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﻴﺴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻝ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻳﻲ ﻣﺴﺨﺮﻩﺍﻱ
ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﻴﺴﻤﻲ ﺳﺮﺩ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺳﺮﺩ .ﺑﻲﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻓﺎﺻﻠﻪ
ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﻫﻢ ﻭ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ,ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻣﺮ
ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ،ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩ ﺑﻴﻮﻟﻮﮊﻳﻜﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﻭ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ
ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻳﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ،ﻛﻪ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮔﻲ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺪﺍﻭﻣﺎً ﻧﮕﺎﻫﺒﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﺳﺖ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ،ﻣﺮﮒ
ﻗﺮﻳﺐﺍﻟﻮﻗﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺗﺨﻴﻠﻲ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺗﺤﺖﺍﻟﻠﻔﻈﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ
۲٤۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﻫﻤﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﻪ
ﺁﻥ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ.
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﻣﺤﺮﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻣﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻮﺩﻥ ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ
ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ
ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲﺍﺵ ،ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮ ﺑﭙﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺭﻭﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺨﺸﺪ ،ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻧﺰﺩ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺪﻭﻱ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺣﻔﻆ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ :ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺧﻮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﺷﻮﺩ
ﻭﻧﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺗﺎ ﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻌﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﺨﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ
ﺑﺨﺸﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻛﻼ ﻣﻐﺸﻮﺵ ﺧﻮﺩ ,ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ
ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻟﻪ ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﻭ "ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ " ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ.
ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﺪﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺜﺎﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ .ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ
ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ ﺧﻮﺭﺩﻥ .ﺍﺳﺘﻮﺍﺭﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﭘﺪﺭﺍﻧﮕﻲ ،ﻛﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺍﺟﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺳﺖ "ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ" ﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ) .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺯﻫﺪﺍﻥ ﺯﻥ ﻭ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﺨﻤﻚ ﺧﺎﻟﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺯﻫﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﻗﺘﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻫﺮ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺯﻧﺎﻧﮕﻲ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ (.ﺍﺗﻮﭘﻴﺎﻱ ﺗﻚ ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ،ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖﻣﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺍﻛﺘﺴﺎﺏ ﻫﻮﻳﺘﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻨﺴﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪ )ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ
۲٥۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﭘﺲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺍﺕ ﻣﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ -ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ
ﻛﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﻜﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻗﺼﺪ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﺎﻣﻞ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻬﻠﻚ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟( ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻭﺍ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ
ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩﺯﺍﻳﻲ ﺳﺮ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ؟ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ.
ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﻭﺍﻟﺪﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮ ﺑﭙﺮﻭﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ
ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺎﺯﺩ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺯﺍﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ :ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ
ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻓﺮﺯﻧﺪ ﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﭘﺪﺭ ،ﺁﻣﻴﺰﺵ ﮊﻥﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺧﺘﻼﻁ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎ ،ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻪ ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻭﺋﻠﻲ ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ
ﺁﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻓﺮﺩ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺑﺴﺘﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻜﻪ
ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺯﻧﺪ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻤﻨﺪ ﻗﻠﻤﻪﺯﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﺷﺎﺧﻪﻫﺎﻱ
ﮔﻴﺎﻫﺎﻥ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﺍﻭﺩﻳﭙﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺘﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻨﺤﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﻫﻢ ﭘﺪﺭ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﺩﺭ
"ﺯﻫﺪﺍﻥ"( ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺎﺩﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲ .ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
۲٥۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻫﻮﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻤﺎﺕ ﺳﻮﮊﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﺴﻮﺥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ
ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻮﻳﺪ .ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﻠﻮﺏ ﻫﻴﻮﻻﻫﺎ
)ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ( ﺑﻪ ﺗﻘﻠﻴﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻀﺤﻜﻪ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻱ ﻛﻬﻦ
ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻓﻜﻨﻲ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﻲ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ .ﺩﺭ ﻃﺮﺡ ﺍﻓﻜﻨﻲ ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺴﺘﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺁﻳﻨﻪ ﻓﺮﺽ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ
ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺑﺎ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺧﻴﺮﻩ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺁﻳﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ) :ﺗﻨﻬﺎ( ﺍﺑﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻳﻚ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻳﺎ
ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻝ ﻭ ﺧﻄﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺻﺮﻓﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﺐ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ
ﻳﻚ ﻗﻄﻌﻪ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺳﺎﻃﺖ ﺧﻴﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺮﻡ ﺧﺎﻛﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﻗﻄﻌﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺮﻡ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤﺎ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺮﻡ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﻫﺮ ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺻﻨﻌﺖ ﮔﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﮕﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺭﺍ
ﻫﻮﻟﻮﮔﺮﺍﻡ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﻘﺴﻢ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﻨﻄﻖ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ
ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ" ،ﻛﻞ" ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻥ،
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﻜﺮﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ
ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻬﺎﻳﺶ ﺗﻘﺴﻴﻢ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﻥ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﺍﻩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾﻧﻤﺎ ،ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ
۲٥۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ،ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺷﺒﻴﻪ ﻣﺪﻟﻬﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺘﻲ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭘﺲ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﺟﺰﺍﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻓﺮﺍﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ .ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﻣﺪﻋﻲ ﮔﺮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ
ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﻛﺪ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺭﻭﺷﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺮﮒ
ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺗﺠﺰﻳﻪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻋﻠﻮﻡ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲ ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩ
ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺗﺠﺮﻳﺪ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺳﻄﺢ ﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻱ ﺳﻠﻮﻝ
ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﻴﻢ :ﻫﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ،
ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﻨﻊ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺘﻖﺷﺪﻩ )ﺍﺯ ﻛﻞ( ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺍﻣﺎ( ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺪﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﻮ -ﺳﺎﻳﺒﺮﻧﺘﻴﻚ
ﻛﻮﭼﻜﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﻣﺸﺘﻖﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻞ ﻫﻢ ،ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻉ ﺟﻨﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺳﻠﻮﻝ ﻧﻘﺶ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻉ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻳﻚ
ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻉ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻨﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﻣﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﺳﻮﺩﻩ ﻣﺤﺴﻮﺏ ﺷﻮﺩ ﭘﺲ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻝ ﺩﻱ .ﺍﻥ.
ﺍﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻭﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ
ﺩﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺑﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻴﺎﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪﺩﻫﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻲﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ
۵۷
ﺳﺎﻳﺒﺮﻧﺘﻴﻜﺶ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ. ﺗﺠﻠﻲ
۲٥۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﺮ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ
"ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻲ" ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻫﺮ ﺟﺰﺋﻲ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﺰﻉﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻭ ﻛﻞ ﺭﺍ
ﺑﺎ ﺟﺎﻧﺸﻴﻦ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺩﻫﺪ) .ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﻟﻐﻮﻱ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ (.ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ
ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻛﺪ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺮﺍﻛﻤﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻞ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﻧﺴﺖ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻭﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ
ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺯﻧﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ )ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻴﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﺪ ﺯﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ(.
ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲﺳﺖ ﻣﺤﺾ ،ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺴﻲ ﺗﺼﻨﻌﻲ ،ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺴﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ
ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻣﺤﺾ ،ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﺍﻟﻌﻤﻞﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ.
***
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﻭ ،ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ،ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻴﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻝ
ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﺍﻧﺘﺰﺍﻋﻲ ﻓﺮﻭ ﻛﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺘﻲ ﺟﺰ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻲﺩﺭﭘﻲ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ .ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ،ﺁﺛﺎﺭ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ "ﺗﺠﻠﻲ" ،ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ "ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﻳﻲ"
ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺜﻞ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺮ" ﺍﺻﻴﻞ" ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﻮﺳﺘﺎﻟﻮﮊﻳﺎ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻋﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺁﻳﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺎ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺭﺩ ،ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺻﻴﻠﻲ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻴﻨﺎً
ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻴﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻱ
۲٥٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ )ﺑﺪﻧﻬﺎ( ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ
ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﺪ .ﻣﺪﻝ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﺑﺮ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ
ﭘﻴﺸﻲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﺯﮔﻮﻧﮕﻲ ،ﻳﻮﺭﺵ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻧﻬﻔﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ
ﺗﺎﻡ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﻲ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﻤﻴﺰﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ؛ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﮊﺭﻓﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ
ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺑﻜﺎﻭﻳﻢ) ،ﭘﺮﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ( ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻉ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻭﻥ ﻓﻨﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﮔﺰﻭﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﺎﻝ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻴﻜﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺎ
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﻭ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ.
ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻦﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻮﻟﻴﺰﻩ )ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻥ( ﻣﻲﺷﺪﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﺎﺑﻮﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮ
ﺑﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﻄﻪ ﻏﻴﺮ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺘﺶ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ ،ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺮ
ﻫﺴﺘﻪ ﺧﺮﺩ ﻣﻮﻟﻜﻮﻟﻲ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺑﺪﻥ ﭼﻮﻥ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺴﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ
ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﮔﺸﺖ ،ﭘﺲ ﺁﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ .ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
۲٥٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺩ "ﺍﻟﻒ" ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻪ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻠﻮﻝ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻃﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻜﻲ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻛﺪ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﻭ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺳﺮﻃﺎﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻛﺪ ﺣﺎﻭﻱ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻟﻲ ﻛﻤﻴﻨﻪ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﺮﺩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ )ﻭﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ( ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ
ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﻃﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻠﻮﻝ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﻞ ﺑﺪﻥ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲ ﻣﻨﻔﺮﺩ .ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﺸﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﻫﻮﻳﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﮔﺮﮔﻮﻧﻲﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﺗﺼﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺑﺨﺸﻴﺪ ,
ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ.
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺳﻠﻮﻟﻲ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﺪ .ﺳﺮﻃﺎﻥ ،
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖ ﻭ ﻭﺍﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻛﺪﻫﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ:
ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﺍﻧﺶﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ )ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ،ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺭﮔﺎﻧﻬﺎ،
ﻣﻲﭼﺮﺧﻨﺪ ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻲ ﻣﻲﻳﺎﺑﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﺎﻫﻮﺍﺭﻩﻱ ﺧﻮﻳﺸﺘﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﺮ
۲٥٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﻓﺮﻣﻮﻟﻬﺎﻱ ﮊﻧﺘﻴﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺟﺎ ﺧﺘﻢ
ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪﺷﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻥ ،ﺟﻨﺴﻴﺖﻫﺎ ،ﻏﻢ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺪﻭﻩ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻲ ﻇﺮﻳﻔﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﺬﺍﺕ ﺑﺮﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﺍﺯ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ -ﻫﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﺭﺍﺩﻱ ،ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻴﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺯﻳﺴﺘﻲ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻧﺎﺭﺳﻴﺲ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺍﺩﻳﭗ ﺳﻪﮔﺎﻧﻪ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻫﻤﺰﺍﺩ ﻣﺼﻨﻮﻋﻲ ،ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻓﺮﺷﺘﻪ
ﻧﮕﻬﺒﺎﻥ ﺷﻤﺎ ،ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﮔﻮﺷﺘﺘﺎﻥ )ﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﺎﺭﻱ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً
ﻛﻠﻤﻪ( ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺨﻠﻮﻗﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﭘﺲ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺒﺎﻫﺘﻲ ﻭﻫﻢﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻤﺎ ،ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪﺷﺪ ﺁﻧﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺭﺍﺯﻱ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻴﺪﺩﺍﺷﺖ" .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪﺗﺎﻥ
ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺩﺗﺎﻥ ﻋﺸﻖ ﺑﻮﺭﺯﻳﺪ ".ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﻴﻞ ﺭﻓﻊ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.
ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﻪ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﺪ .ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻛﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ.
ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻭﺳﺎﻃﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ
ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﭘﺴﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ،ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺎﺩﮔﻲ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻤﻬﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ
ﺷﺒﻜﻪﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺤﺮﻙﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﺠﻴﺘﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺨﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ) .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ
ﺗﻮﺩﻩ ﺭﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ (.ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻲ ،ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻱ
ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻄﻲ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ )ﺧﻮﺩ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﺳﺎﺯﻱ( ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ
۵۸
)ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ(×
۲٥۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﻫﻴﭻﻛﺲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺩﻭﺍﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺘﻲ
ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ .ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻣﺒﺮﻣﻲ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻘﻼﻧﻲ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ .ﭼﻪ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻗﻄﺐ ﻏﺎﻳﺐ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻗﻄﺐ
ﺧﻨﺜﻲ ﻭ ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ؟ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭﻙ
ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ )ﻧﻴﺰ( ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺭﻓﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻪ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﺎﻋﺚ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻀﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻲﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺴﺖ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﻤﻮﺩﻩﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻨﻌﻄﻒ
ﺑﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻐﻨﺎﻃﻴﺴﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﻥ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥ ،ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﻲ ﺗﻬﻲ ﺷﻜﻞﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ
ﻣﺒﻠﻐﻴﻦ ،ﻣﻮﺳﺴﺎﻥ ،ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺡ ﻭ ﺫﻫﻦ ﻭ (...ﻭ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ،ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﭘﻮﭼﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺑﺮﺍﺣﺘﻲ "ﺗﻬﻲﺑﻮﺩﮔﻲ" ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻨﺪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ":ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺧﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ".ﻭﺍﮊﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩﻱ ﺳﻄﺤﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺘﺬﻝ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻱ ﺗﺤﺖ ﺍﻟﻔﻈﻲﺍﺵ ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﺸﻨﺪﻩ ﺗﺒﺎﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﺕ ﺭﻭﻏﻦﻛﺎﺭﻱ
ﻧﺮﻡ ،ﻳﻚ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ semiurgy ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺩﻻﻟﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ
۲٥۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻧﺮﻡ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﻧﺮﻡ )ﺳﺎﻓﺖ( ،ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻮﻡﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩ ﻋﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎﻱ
ﺳﺨﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ .ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﭼﺸﻢ ﻧﻤﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺒﺴﻂ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺷﺮﺍﻓﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ
ﺗﻨﻲ ﺩﻡ ﺯﺩ .ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺭﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ
ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻴﺰﺵ ﻓﻴﮕﻮﺭ ﺧﻴﺎﻟﻲ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺩﺭ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻋﻮﺍﻡﭘﺴﻨﺪﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ .ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻣﺘﻌﻠﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺳﺘﻤﺪﻳﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ
ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲﺷﺎﻥ ﺗﻌﻤﻴﻖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﻪ
ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻜﻞ ،ﻣﻴﻞ ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﺘﻴﺶ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﮔﺬﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺟﺎﻭﺩﺍﻧﻪﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﭘﺎﻟﻮﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻨﺪﮔﻲﺍﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻃﻠﻮﻉ ﺳﻮﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮﻳﺘﻪ
ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺳﭙﻴﺪﻩ ﺩﻡ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﻭ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﺭﻭﺷﻨﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ! ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﺴﻠﻂ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪ ﺳﻮﮊﻩ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﻲ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﻱ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ ﺗﺠﻴﻬﺰ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺁﺷﻔﺘﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺭﻣﺰﻱ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺩﺍﺷﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺩﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﻭﻣﻴﻠﻲ )ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺗﺒﺎﻩﺷﺪﻩ( ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﻩ
ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﻳﺮﻭﺯ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ )ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻲ( ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ,ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﻌﻄﻮﻑ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺍﻣﻴﺎﻝ
۲٥۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ .ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻘﻴﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ! ﺳﻠﻄﻪﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺯﻭﺭ ﻭ ﺭﻓﺘﺎﺭ
ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻛﻠﻲﺗﺮ ،ﺧﻴﺎﻝﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﻟﻴﺒﻴﺪﻳﻨﺎﻟﺶ ﺩﺭ
ﭘﺸﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻻ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ .ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ )ﺑﺤﺚ ﻓﻮﻛﻮ -ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ( ﺟﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﻴﺐﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ
ﺑﺎﺯﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ .ﻋﺼﺎﺭﻩ ﻫﻤﻮﻓﺎﺗﻴﻚ ۵۹ﺑﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ
ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﺎﻳﻪﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ،ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﻭ
ﭘﻮﺷﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ.
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻊ ،ﻣﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﺍﺯ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ
ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﻭ ﭘﺘﺎﻧﺴﻴﻠﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﻴﻢ) ،ﺑﻞ( ﮔﻴﺠﻲ ﺷﻮﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺘﻲ ﺗﺎ ﺑﻪ
ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻤﻦ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ )ﮔﻮﻳﺎ ﻫﻴﭻﭼﻴﺰ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻨﺤﺮﻑ ﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺗﺎ ﻭﺍﮊﮔﻮﻥ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ (.ﻧﻪ ﺣﺘﻲ ﺗﺒﺎﻫﻲ ﻣﻌﺼﻮﻣﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻘﻮﺍ )ﻧﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺧﻼﻗﻴﺎﺕ
ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻧﺤﺮﺍﻑ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ( ﻫﺮ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؟ "ﻣﺮﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ" " .ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﺖ ﻛﻨﻢ ".ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﻫﻤﻪ
ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ .ﻣﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻱ
ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﺓ ﺁﻥ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻧﻤﻲﮔﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺁﻥ
ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺨﻦ ﮔﻔﺘﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺟﺰ ﻓﻘﺪﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪ ﺁﻭﺭ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
۲٦۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺟﺰ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻠﻲ ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﺯﺑﺎﻧﺸﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﻧﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍ ،ﺁﻣﻴﺰﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ،ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻬﺎﻱ
ﺛﺎﺑﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﺤﺾ ﻭ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺷﺎﮔﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻣﻌﻠﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻣﻦ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻢ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﺪ ﻣﺮﺍ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ (.ﻳﺎ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﻪ
ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ ﻭ ﻋﻤﻮﻡ ،ﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ )ﺁﻩ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ!( ﻳﺎ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻠﮕﺮ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ
ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﻭ...
ﻳﺴﻮﻋﻴﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻱ ﻣﺬﻫﺒﻲ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﺪﻥ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺑﻪ
ﺁﻏﻮﺵ ﻛﻠﻴﺴﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﻟﻴﻚ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺑﺎﺭﻭﻙ ،ﺷﻬﺮﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ:
ﺑﺎﺯ ﭘﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻭﺟﺪﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻣﻨﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﻀﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻝ ﺗﺠﻤﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺯﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺱﺍﻧﮕﻴﺰ .ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ
ﻳﺴﻮﻋﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺠﻤﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻭ
ﻧﺴﺒﺘﺎً ﻫﻢ ﻣﻮﻓﻖ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻳﺒﻨﺪﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﻳﺎﺿﺖﻛﺸﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻭ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﻱ -ﺣﻠﻘﻪ ﭘﻮﺭﻳﺘﺎﻧﻲ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﺩﺍﺭﻱ -ﺑﺎ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺗﻮﻟﻴﻜﻲ ﻭ ﻳﺴﻮﻋﻲ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﭼﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻫﻮﺱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺗﺤﻘﻖ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻣﺘﺰﻟﺰﻝ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ،ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺸﻖ ﻭ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ
ﺫﺍﺗﻲ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻜﺘﻴﻚ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺪﻩ ﭼﻪ ﺭﺥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺩ ﻭﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺑﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺑﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ؟ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺟﺰ ﻓﻮﺭﺍﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﺰﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺮﻫﻨﻪﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﻬﻮﺍﻧﻲ
۲٦۱
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﺘﺸﺎﺵ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﻟﺬﺕ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ
ﻳﻚ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﻌﺎﻭﺿﻪ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺭﻭﻏﻦﻛﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﺍﺭﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ؟ »ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﻤﺶ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻧﻲﺍﺵ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﻄﺮﻧﺎﻙ
ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻣﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﻢ) «.ﺭﻭﻟﻴﻦ( .ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺳﻨﺘﻲ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﻃﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ
ﺍﺧﺘﻔﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺮﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻘﺎﺻﺪ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﻛﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺷﺨﺺ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﻩﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ
ﻃﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﺪﻥ ،ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻃﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻃﻞ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ .ﺩﺭ
ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻡ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ.
ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺫﻳﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ :ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭘﻴﺶﺗﺮ
ﺗﺴﻠﻴﻢ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ،ﻛﻞ ﻳﻚ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮓ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻳﻦ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺣﻮﻝ
ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ) .ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﻣﺘﻀﺎﺩ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ( ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻧﻲ-
ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻥ /ﻃﺮﺍﺭﺍﻥ -ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ
ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺗﺼﻮﻳﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ،ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻣﺴﻴﺤﻲ ﻭ
۲٦۲
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻳﺎ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺩﻭ ﻃﺮﻓﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺯﻧﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﺩﻳﻦ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ،ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ
ﻣﻲﺷﺪ.
ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺍﻡ ﻧﻴﺮﻧﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﭼﻪ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ؟ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻧﻬﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻟﺬﺕ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺟﻮﻳﻨﺪ -ﺣﺘﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺧﺸﻮﻧﺖ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﺪﻥ
-ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ ،ﺩﺭﻙ ﺭﺍﺯﻭﺭﺯﺍﻧﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻗﻴﺎﺳﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ
ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺟﺎﺩﻭ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻥ ،ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺿﻴﻪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻓﺮﻭﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ
ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖﭘﺬﻳﺮﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﺳﺖ؛ ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﺑﻲﺭﻭﺡ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﻛﻪ
ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻬﺎ ﻱ ﺑﻲﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺰﻧﺪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻓﺮﻳﻔﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ.
ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺳﻮﮔﻮﺍﺭﻱ ﺧﻮﺩﺵ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻭﻇﻴﻔﻪ ﻓﺮﺩﻱ ﻭ
ﻭﻫﻢﺁﻭﺭ ﺟﻬﺖﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻘﻞ ﻭ ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﻝ .ﻣﺎ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻴﺮﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻳﻢ.
ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺮﻱ ﭘﻮﭺ ،ﺍﺑﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺳﻠﻄﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﺎﻟﻴﺰﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﻧﺮﮊﻱﻫﺎ ،ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻗﺎﻧﻮﻥ ﻭ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮ ،ﺟﻬﺎﻥ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ،ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺑﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻛﺘﻴﻮﺵ ﺭﺥ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﻭ
ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺴﻠﻂ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺍﻟﺘﺮﻧﺎﺗﻴﻮ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ
ﻣﺮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺑﺰﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺟﺎ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﻪ )ﺍﻱ .ﺩﻱ( ﺳﺨﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﺍﻧﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﭼﻮﻥ
۲٦۳
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎ ،ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻭ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺻﺮﻳﺢ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻣﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻳﻲ ﻧﺮﻡ .ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﭼﻴﺰﻫﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ ﺳﺴﺖ ﻭ
ﻛﻢﺭﻣﻖ ﺍﺳﺖ :ﺗﺰﺋﻴﻴﻦ ،ﺩﺳﺘﻜﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻚ ،ﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻱ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ،ﺟﺬﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻛﻞ ﻓﻀﺎﻱ ﭘﻬﻨﺎﻭﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ
ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﺟﺰ ﻗﺪﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺬ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﻧﻔﻮﺫ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﺣﺘﻲ ﻗﺎﺩﺭﻧﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻧﻬﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﻓﻮﻕ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺤﻂ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﺑﺎ ﻓﻮﻕ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻣﻨﺤﻂ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎ ،ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ) .ﻭ ﭼﻨﺎﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﺎﻳﻠﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﮔﻔﺖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻏﻴﺮ
ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ (.ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﻣﺪﻝ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﭘﺨﺶ
ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺳﺨﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺍﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺗﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖ )ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ( ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
***
ﮔﻔﺘﻤﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻃﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﻣﻴﻞ ﻳﺎ
ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﻟﻴﺒﻴﺪﻳﻨﺎﻝ ،ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﺪﺍﻥ ﺷﺪﻳﺪﺍً ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﺩ .ﺑﺎ
ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎ ،ﻫﺮﮔﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻢ ﻓﺮﺍﺯ ﻭ ﻧﺸﻴﺐﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻋﺼﺮ
ﭘﺎﻥﺍﭘﺘﻴﻚ ﺷﺮﺡ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ -ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺁﻟﻴﺴﻢ ﻣﺎﺭﻛﺴﻲ -ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﺍﻧﻪ
ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺣﻮﺍﺩﺙ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﻌﺎﺻﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻭﺭﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻧﺮﻡ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮﮊﻱ ﻣﻴﻞ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﮕﺮﻱ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ،
۲٦٤
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻲ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﻣﺖﺁﻣﻴﺰ ،ﺑﺎ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺁﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺭﺍﺯﮔﻮﻧﻪﺍﻧﺪ .ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ
ﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻱ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺍﻧﻜﺎﻭﺍﻧﻪ ،ﻧﻪ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻳﻲ ﺳﺮﺩ ﻭ
ﻛﻤﻴﻨﻪ.
۲٦٥
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺎ ﮔﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﻱ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺟﺬﺍﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﭘﺮﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ
ﺷﺒﺢ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺭﺍﺯ ﻣﺎ ،ﺗﺨﻴﻼﺕ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻣﺎ ﻭ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ
ﻣﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﮔﺸﺖﻭﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺭﻭﻳﺪﺍﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺪﺭﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺸﺎﺭﻛﺖﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺑﻴﺎﻥﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﻪ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﻭ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻫﺎﻳﺶ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﺎﺏ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ؟ ﻳﺎ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺩﺭ
ﺭﻭﺵ ﺣﺎﺩﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺿﻲ ﻣﺪﺍﺧﻠﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻴﺖ -ﺩﺭ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ،ﻫﻨﺮ ﺑﺪﻥ ﻫﻨﺮ ﻭ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ
ﺑﻲﺟﺎﻥ -ﺟﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ،ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻓﺮﻳﺐﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺎﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ،ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻝ ﻣﺤﺾ ،ﺩﺭ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺘﻲ ﺭﺍﺩﻳﻜﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﮔﻔﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻗﺎﺣﺘﻲ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﻭ
ﺑﻲﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺍﺷﻜﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺭﺍﺯﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﻭ ﮔﺴﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻳﻢ .ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﻴﻦ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻣﺤﺾ ،ﭘﻮﭺ ﻭ ﻭﻗﻴﺢﺍﺵ ﺣﻜﻤﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻧﻲ
۲٦٦
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲﺍﺵ ،ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ،ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﻭ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻳﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺯﺩﺍﻳﺪ ﻭ
ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒﺎﺭﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﻭﺍﻟﺘﺮ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ )ﺩﺭ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ( ﻭ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺁﻥ
ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ؟ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﺍﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺎ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﻴﺎﻳﻲ ﺁﻳﻴﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺳﭙﺲ
ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻳﺎ ﻓﺮﻫﻨﮕﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻲ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻇﺎﻳﻔﻲ ﻛﻤﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﻣﻨﺶ
ﻳﻜﺘﺎﻳﻲ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ ﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﮔﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ﺍﻣﺎ
ﻣﺘﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻭ ﻳﮕﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎً ﺷﻜﻞ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺒﺪﻝ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ
ﺍﺛﺮ ﻫﻨﺮﻱ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻳﻨﺪ ﭼﺎﺭﻩﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﻣﻜﺎﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﻫﻴﭻ
ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺻﻴﻠﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺖ) .ﺍﺻﺎﻟﺖ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ
ﻣﻘﺪﺳﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ (.ﺍﻣﺮ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲﺍﺵ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ
ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ ﺍﺑﮋﻩﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻇﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺮﺩﺵ ﻭ ﻛﻤﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ.
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﺮﺍﺣﻞ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲ )ﺗﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻲ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻳﻲ ،ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ( ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ )ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱ
ﺷﻴﻄﺎﻧﻲ .ﭘﺲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪ ﻧﻔﺮﻳﻦﺷﺪﻩ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ،ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻱﻫﺎ
ﻭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﻬﺎﻳﺶ( ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎً ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ) .ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﻣﻴﻦ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪﻱ ﻣﺒﻬﻢ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ(
ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ﻭﺍﭘﺴﻴﻦ ،ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﺻﻴﻞ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ،ﺷﻜﻞ ﺯﻳﺒﺎﻳﻲﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺁﻳﻴﻨﻲﺍﺵ ،ﻧﺎﭘﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﭼﻬﺎﺭﭼﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺸﺘﺎﻕ
ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﺑﻲﺣﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺼﺮ ﺷﻜﻠﻬﺎﻱ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻣﺤﺘﻮﻱ ﺍﻧﺪ) .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﺖ ﻓﻨﻲﺍﺵ
۲٦۷
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ﺟﺪﺍﻧﺸﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻜﻨﻴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ
ﻣﺘﻮﺍﻟﻲ ﺟﺪﺍ ﻧﺸﺪﻧﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ (.ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺑﮋﻩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﻴﻨﻪ ﭘﺮﺍﻛﻨﺪﮔﻲ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ ﻭ
ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺷﺪﺕ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻌﻠﻖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍﮔﺮﻱ؟ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ
ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺷﺮﻁﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ؟ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻫﻢ ﭼﻮﻥ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ
ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ؟ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻠﻴﻪ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﮊﺭﻓﻤﻨﺪ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺘﺸﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮﺷﺎﻥ؟ ﻣﺎ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻲﺣﺴﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺮﻳﻢ ﻭ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺍﻧﻤﺎﻳﻲ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻓﺴﻮﻥﺯﺩﺍﻳﻲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻲﺣﺴﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺷﻜﻞ
ﺷﻴﻔﺘﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺁﻧﺎﺗﻮﻣﻲ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻧﻪ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ :ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﺗﻘﺪﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ
ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺷﻮﻡ ﻭ ﺟﺎﺩﻭﻳﻲ ،ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﭘﺮﻣﺨﺎﻃﺮﻩ ،ﺳﺮﮔﻴﺠﻪﺁﻭﺭ ﻭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻲ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ
ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﻥ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ )ﻫﻢ( ﺩﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺮﺋﻲ ﺑﻲﺣﺲ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪ ،ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺵ ﻭ ﻣﻮﺛﺮ
ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ.
ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﻋﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﮔﺸﺘﻪﺍﺳﺖ .ﭘﺎﺩﺷﺎﻩ ﻋﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﮔﺸﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪ ﻭ
ﺧﻮﺩ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﺑﻪ ﺳﻮﻱ ﺑﻲﭘﺮﺩﻩﮔﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ »ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ« ﺗﺤﻤﻞﻧﺎﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺳﻜﺲ ﺟﺰ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ
ﺩﺳﺘﺎﻭﺭﺩﺵ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ .ﺧﻮﺷﺒﺨﺘﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺁﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ .ﻭ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻱ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻡﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﻞ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﺎﻗﻲ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﺳﺖ" :ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺎ ﺁﺭﺯﻭ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ
ﺣﻘﻴﻘﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺁﺷﻜﺎﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﺁﻧﻜﻪ ﺩﺷﻮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﺮﺍ ﻋﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺗﺼﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﻴﻢ".
۲٦۸
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
ﭘﺎﻧﻮﺷﺖ
44
Goblot
45ﻗﺎﻋﺪﻩ ﻗﻤﺎﺭﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺗﻮﺍﻓﻖ ﻛﺎﻣﻼً ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻃﺮﻓﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻤﺎﺭﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﻣﺒﺎﺩﻻﺕ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻱ
ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻮﺍﻋﺪ ﺑﺎﺯﻱ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺟﺴﺖ .ﻡ.ﻑ
46ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲﺷﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﺪﺍﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﻨﺪ ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺣﻘﻴﺮ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺪﺍﻱ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﻲ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﺎ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩﻱ ﻛﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻭﺍﻻ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺨﺖﺁﺯﻣﺎﻳﻲ ﻓﺮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻻﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺷﺎﻧﺲ ﺭﻭﻳﺎﺭﻭﻳﻲ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻩ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﺩﻻﺭ
ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.ﻡ.ﻑ
47
ideal game
48
The Lottery in Babylon
49
Jogo de Bicho
50ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻀﺤﻚ ﻭ ﭘﻮﭺ ,ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﻓﻦﺁﻭﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻮﻧﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎ ,ﻣﺎﺗﺮﻳﻜﺲﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺗﺼﺎﻻﺕ ﻭ ﺗﻜﺜﻴﺮ
ﺑﻲﺭﻭﻳﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺷﻴﻔﺘﮕﻲ ﺁﻥ ,ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﻏﻮﺍ ﻭ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ.
Holocaust 51 ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭﺭﻩ ﺷﻜﻨﺠﻪﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻧﺎﺯﻱﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻟﻤﺎﻧﻲ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮﭼﻪ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺸﺎﺕ ﺿﺪ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﻣﺎ ﻣﻮﺝ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ
۱۹۳۳ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﮔﺸﺖ .ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﻼﺕ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻳﺎﻥ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ ﺍﻣﻮﺍﻟﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻏﺎﺭﺕ ﻣﻲﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺘﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻫﻬﺎﻱ ﺟﻤﻌﻲ
ﻓﺮﺳﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻫﻴﺘﻠﺮ ﻣﺨﻔﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻫﻬﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﮒ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺎﺳﻴﺲ ﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ "ﺭﺍﻩ ﺣﻞ
ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﻳﻬﻮﺩ" ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﺪ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ ﺳﻴﺼﺪ ﻫﺰﺍﺭ ﻳﻬﻮﺩﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻛﻴﻒ
ﻛﺸﺘﻪﺷﺪﻧﺪ .ﺗﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺍﻣﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺶ ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ.
Homeophatic 52 ﺭﻭﺷﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺠﻮﻳﺰ ﻭ ﻣﺪﻳﺮﻳﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻭﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻋﻼﺋﻢ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ
ﺑﻴﻤﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ.
53
Malinowski
54
Jean Querzola
55
bionic Mirror
56
Dr Rorvik
57
Pr.A.Jacpuard
58
× ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﭼﻴﭗ ﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﻜﺮﻭ ﭼﻴﭗ ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻂ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻴﻤﻪ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺎﻫﺎ ،ﻫﺰﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭﻳﺎ
ﻣﻴﻠﻴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ،ﺧﺎﺯﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺮﺍﻧﺰﻳﺴﺘﻮﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺪﺍﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ.
call in shows, all out ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﺎﺕ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺗﻠﻔﻨﻲ Non directive interviews,
participation
۲٦۹
ﮊﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ
:avatar 59 ﺗﺠﻠﻲ ﻭ ﺗﺠﺴﻢ ﺧﺪﺍﻳﻲ ﭘﻨﻬﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺣﻴﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﺯﻧﻤﻮﺩﻱ ﻛﻴﻔﻲ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻣﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺗﺠﻠﻲ
ﻣﻮﻗﺘﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻣﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﻮﺩﺭﻳﺎﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ D.N.Aﺗﺠﻠﻲ ﺳﺎﻳﺒﺮﻧﺘﻴﻜﻲ ﻛﻠﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺟﻮﻫﺮ ﺍﻧﺴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ.
۲۷۰
ﺍﻏﻮﺍ
۲۷۱