Professional Documents
Culture Documents
From the table of velocity of sound in solid in the temperature of air t 26.5 °C
textbook, compare the obtained experimental
velocity of sound in air Vair 347.9 m/s
value with the theoretical value. In addition, the
experimental value can also be compared with
the value obtained in equation 9. The percentage
error gives us the numerical digit of the error While doing strokes on the rod, friction is
done in the experiment. Notice that the value produced between the cloth and the rod. As a
obtained in equation 9 is much smaller with the result, energy or disturbance will occur in a form
theoretical of longitudinal wave. The vibrations of the rod
value. To be are transmitted by the disk to the air in the glass
intact with the tube closed at one end. The waves set up in the
theoretical air in the glass tube have the same frequency as
value, it is those in the rod. Hence, a resonance will be
better to used formed and produces sound.
We can also calculate for the value of the velocity Using the theoretical value, using the textbook
of sound in metal rod using the elasticity (more accurate), we can also calculate for the
property of the metal used through the used of amount of error produced after committing
equation 9. The values for constants are not that
uncertainties in measuring. The table is shown ends. Also, if the same conditions is applied,
above. then,
This report has discussed the relationship of Besides from the application of the resonance,
velocity of sound in both gas (air) and solid velocity of sound in rod can also be evaluated by
(metal rod) through manipulation of certain considering the elasticity and density of the
condition to produce resonance. The goals of this material where the sound wave travels. The
lab were to obtain the velocity of sound in metal velocity is directly proportional to the Young’s
rod as well as the velocity of sound in the tube modulus of elasticity and inversely proportional
with the application of resonance. Those to the density of the material being used.
objectives were met by obeying the conditions
needed such as clamping the rod at its midpoint, Aside from the velocity of sound in metal, we
closing the one end of the glass tube while the learned that it is an important factor to consider
other end is free, and by making the disk in the the velocity of sound in air if we are to use the
rod not to be in contact with the glass tube. By resonance principle in the Kundt’s tube. The said
that means, the relationship derived in the velocity is somewhat linearly dependent with
equation given in the laboratory manual is temperature. So, for every rise in temperature
followed. per Celsius degree, the velocity of the sound is
increased by 0.6 m/s.
By constantly applying stroke on the rod, friction
is produced. So, longitudinal wave is produced. It The finding in the experiment for the value of
goes down the tube from the rod at equal velocity of sound in metal rod using the principle
frequency, hence making a resonance, and of resonance is 3460 m/s. When the uncertainties
produces sound. in measurements are considered, the velocity will
expand to a range of 3460.09 m/s±58.31m/s.
In keeping track of the length of the visible wave Using the elasticity property of the material,
pattern produced after the dust is being agitated brass, the velocity is 3414 m/s while using the
book as a reference; it is 3475 m/s. Upon Then I would like to thank my Professor, Mr. De
comparison with the experimental value, the Leon for guiding me and my friends throughout
error differences are 1.35% and 0.429%, the experiment. We had some difficulties in doing
respectively. However, the theoretical values lie this task, but he taught us patiently until we
within the range of uncertainty. knew what to do. He tried and tried to teach us
until we understand what we supposed to do in
REFERENCES order to have a highly accurate data.
[1] Young, H., Freedman, R., University Physics Lastly, I offer my regards and blessings to God
with Modern Physics, 11th Edition, 2004 who guides me to have an idea what to do during
the completion of the report.
[2] Bernard, C.H., Laboratory Experiment in
College Physics, 7th Edition, 1995 FREE SPACE
[3] Wilson, Jerry D., Physics Laboratory
Experiments, 6th edition, 2003 Our professor in Physics 3 Laboratory wonders
why I am still quantifying the error in the
[4] http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/ experiment. He wonder why do I have still a time
class/phscilab/kundt2.html doing it, given that we are in Mapua, which has a
busy and cramming environment.
[5] http://www.nikhef.nl/~h73/kn1c/praktikum
/phywe/LEP/Experim/1_5_06.pdf The simple answer for that is because I have a
simple reference. In this book, guidelines and
rules on propagation of errors is instructed. This
[6] http://dev.physicslab.org/Document.aspx
book is ideal on making a report, especially for
?
quantitative analysis (while in chemistry, it’s
doctype=2&filename=WavesSound_SpeedSound
usually qualitative). Without further a do, this is
Copper.xml
how it works.