Professional Documents
Culture Documents
shtml
You are using the online sample of the Teaching and Learning
about DecimalsCDROM. Not all linked pages are accessible in
this version. For further information about the complete
CDROM please click here.
Longer-is-larger misconceptions
These students generally pick longer decimals to be larger numbers. There are a variety
of reasons why they do this. Some children have not adequately made the decimal-
fraction link and others have place value difficulties. The most common reasons for
longer-is-larger behavior are outlined below. Longer-is-larger misconceptions are most
common in primary school, with about 40% of Grade 5 students interpreting decimals
this way, diminishing to about 5% by Year 10 (see research data).
Learners with this way of thinking assume that digits after the decimal point make
another whole number. They have not effectively made the decimal-fraction link. Our
data indicates that 30% of Grade 5 students are thinking this way, although figures as
high as 60% of Grade 5 at some schools have been recorded.
At one extreme, some children see the decimal point as separating two quite separate
whole numbers. For example, instead of thinking of a decimal number such as 4.8 or
4.63 as a number between 4 and 5, they may see the numbers as two separated whole
numbers 4 and 8 or 4 and 63. If asked to circle the larger of the two numbers, such a
child might circle the 63 only, instead of either 4.8 or 4.63. These children are rare and
need individual remedial help.
More commonly, children who have not completely made the decimal-fraction link will
think of two different types of whole numbers making up a decimal such as 4.63:
There are some variations in the way whole number thinkers order decimals. Sometimes
these students select just on length alone, e.g. they will pick 0.021 to be larger than 0.21
just because it is longer. Other students look more carefully at the decimal part as a
whole number, so that they will think that 0.21 and 0.0021 are equal, because the two
whole numbers 21 and 0021 are equal. Click here to see a case study of 'Caitlin', who is
a whole number thinker like this.
Some students will usually choose longer decimals as larger, but will make correct
choices when the initial decimal digits are zero. For example, these children will say
0.43 is greater than 0.5 but will know that 0.043 is smaller than 0.5. One group of these
students, called column overflow thinkers, have made the decimal-fraction link but have
trouble with fundamentals of place value. Column overflow thinkers have learnt the
correct column names for decimal numbers, but attempt to write too many digits into a
column. So 0.12 is 12 tenths (as there is no zero after the point) while 0.012 is 12
hundredths (as there is one zero after the point). In effect, they squeeze the number 12
into one column. This is why we call it column overflow.
Column overflow thinkers interpret 0.35 as 35 tenths, 0.149 as 149 tenths and 0.678912
as 678912 tenths, 0.035 as 35 hundredths, 0.0149 as 149 hundredths and 0.0043 as 43
thousandths. This thinking generally leads to choosing the longer decimals as larger
except when there are zeros in the first decimal places.
These difficulties are like the difficulties shown by small children learning to count who
often say:" . . sixty six, sixty seven, sixty eight, sixty nine, sixty ten, sixty eleven, sixty
twelve...".
Similarly when children first learn to add, they may put more than one digit in each
place value column:
14 +
58
___
612
Understanding how to rename this number from "sixty twelve" (arrived at by the
addition) to seventy two depends on understanding the relationships between the place
values of the columns. Ten in the units column gives one in the tens column. Column
overflow thinkers may have mastered this idea for whole numbers, but need to learn it
again for the decimal positions.
Column overflow thinking also arise simply by "forgetting" which column name to take
when describing the decimal as a fraction. Instead of getting the name from the
rightmost column (in this case the hundredths, as 0.35 is 35 hundredths) the student may
just take the name from the leftmost column (the tenths).
Some children who order decimals in the same way as column overflow thinkers (above)
actually seem to know little at all about place value. These zero-makes-small thinkers
may have very little idea of the decimal as representing a fractional part. They respond
to many of questions as do whole number thinkers. They know, however, just one thing
more than do whole number thinkers - that a decimal starting with zero in the tenths
column is smaller than one which does not. For example, they will know that 0.21 is
larger than 0.0021 or 0.012345. Unlike whole number thinkers, they therefore can
choose that 0.0762 is smaller than 0.53 correctly. A child with this misconception will
order decimals in the same way as a column overflow thinker, but talking to them will
reveal the differences.
Reverse Thinking
Some children do not know that the place value of the columns decreases when we move
to the right. They know there is a similarity between the patterns of column names on
the right and the left, but may assume they are the same. Occasionally this results in a
child thinking that the names for the place value columns are the same on both sides of
the decimal point:
There seem to be two causes for this thinking pattern. A few children, especially
younger children, may have very little idea of fractions and have not begun to appreciate
numbers less than one. More likely, hearing difficulties or language background is the
cause. Often a child with this misconception has not heard the "th" sound in the column
names; so rather than tenths, hundredths and thousandths, they believe that there are
more tens, hundreds and thousands to the right of the decimal point. Judgments about
the size of the decimal number are affected by what are perceived to be the columns
with the largest value, that is the most-right columns.
The final "ths" sound is often missed by children from language backgrounds where a
final "s" or "ths" is not a normal sound. Tenths sounds very similar
to tens, hundredths to hundredsetc. Teachers must be very clear in speech and
writing. Click here for more information.
Shorter-is-larger misconceptions
These students generally pick shorter decimals to be larger numbers. There are a variety
of reasons why they do this. The first reason is inability to coordinate the numerator and
denominator of a fraction; the others are related to students drawing false analogies with
fractions and negative numbers. Our research data shows that at any one time, about
10% of students in all grades from 5 to 10 have shorter-is-larger misconceptions.
These students often have a good knowledge of place value names, but they have
difficulty coordinating the size of the numerator and denominator of a fraction. They
understand, for example, that 0.4 =4 tenths and that 0.83= 83 hundredths. They also
know that tenths are larger than hundredths. They wrongly conclude that 0.4 is greater
than 0.83 because they think only about the size of the parts (the tenths or hundredths)
and cannot simultaneously consider how many parts there are. This is why we call them
"denominator-focussed" thinkers. These children need more help with coordinating the
influence of the numerator and denominator for fractions (see decimal-
fraction link).Click here to see a case study of 'Ricardo', a denominator focussed
thinker. Click here to see how he is likely to count with decimals.
Students who use denominator focussed thinking are aware of the place value of
decimals, but cannot readily move between the various forms of decimals that are
evident using expanded notation. For instance, Nesher and Peled (1986, p73) report an
interview with an Israeli denominator-focussed child who was explaining why 4.45 was
chosen as greater than 4.4502:
"Up to here (points to the 4.45 part) it's the same number, this zero doesn't make a
difference, but here the 2 (4.4502) is ten-thousandths and here (4.45) it's hundredths, so
hundredths that's bigger."
So the child has a strong vision of the decimal parts of the numbers as 45 hundredths and
4502 ten thousandths but doesn't also see the latter in the partially expanded form 45
hundredths + 2 ten thousandths.
Reciprocal thinking
Another reason for shorter-is-larger thinking is that children are trying to interpret
decimal notation in terms of the more familiar fraction notation. They have made the
decimal-fraction link but, unlike the denominator-focussed thinkers above, they do not
consider place value. They see the decimal part as the denominator of a fraction, with
larger denominators creating smaller fractions. For example, they think that 0.12 is
something like 1/12 (they may not think it is really the same) and 0.3456 is something
like 1/3456. The consequence of this is that they act as if longer decimals give smaller
numbers.
Students with this misconception can be distinguished from others when they are asked
to choose the larger of two decimals of equal length such as 0.3 and 0.4. They choose
0.3 (because 1/3 is larger than 1/4). For this reason, we call them reciprocal thinkers.
(Seeglossaryfor reciprocal)
Such a student may interpret 2.6 as being like two and one sixth or as 2/6. For a question
which asked students to write a decimal to tell what part of a region was shaded, more
than 25% of Grade 7 students in a national survey of students in the USA wrote 1.5 for
1/5 and 1.4 for 1/4. (Hiebert, 1985). Many students exhibit confusion between fraction
and decimal notation. Carpenter et al (1981) report the results of a large sample of 13
year-old children in the USA On a multiple-choice question which asked for the decimal
equivalent of 1/5 only 38% answered correctly, whilst just as many students (38%)
chose 0.5.
Because decimals do not explicitly show the denominator, (the value is instead indicated
by the place), it is likely that some students will assume that the numbers written
represent the denominator, rather than the numerator of the associated fraction.
Click here to see a case study of 'Courtney' who thinks like this. Click here to see how
Courtney is likely to count.
Confusion between fractions and decimals/percents even happens in high places. When
President Clinton was opening the G8 summit in 1997 he was reported to make the
following statement about the USA, intending to show that it had more than a fair share
of wealth in the world, but saying, instead, that it has approximately a fair share.
"We are now slightly less than one-fifth of the world's population, but we have
slightly more than 20% of the world's wealth and income. This is not a matter
requiring Einstein to calculate."
The population of the USA is in fact slightly less than 5% of the world's population, not
one-fifth at all. Has someone important has confused 5% and 1/5?
Negative thinking
When Voula, a Year 9 student, was asked to indicate how long 0.9 of a metre was, she
paused for a long time before stretching out her arm and pointing to the left saying:
Voula was confusing the length 0.9m, with 9 metres in some sort of negative/opposite
direction.
Anita, a tertiary student, explained why she had chosen 0.20 to be larger than 0.35
"I was thinking along a number line and considering decimal numbers to be equivalent
to negative numbers. Therefore -20 was larger than -35".
"I felt more comfortable selecting the number with the least digits as I though the longer
the number, the further it was down the number line in the negative direction."
Irwin (1996) , working in New Zealand, also described children who were confused
about negatives and decimals. When they were asked to put numbers on a number line:
This confusion is obviously more likely to occur after students have worked with
negative numbers at school (Year 7/8 on), but it also occurs in younger children.
Elizabeth, a Grade 6 girl whose understanding of decimals otherwise appeared very
sound placed the numbers 0.149 and 0.65 on a number line in the positions of -0.149 and
-0.65.
Like reciprocal thinkers, these negative thinkers will generally choose shorter decimals
as larger.
Why might decimals and negatives be confused? We speculate that the reason for a
confusion of decimals/fractions and negatives is psycholinguistic in origin. They both
arise as opposites, as "inverses" of cognitively "positive" operations which make
numbers bigger. Decimals (and fractions) arise from division, the inverse of
multiplication. Negatives arise from subtraction, the inverse of addition. So, in a sense,
negatives and decimals/fractions are both ways of being opposite of positive and big.
Both 1/3 and -3 arise as "opposites" of 3, the primary quantity.
To stop this confusion, be sure that children's ideas of decimals become well
consolidated, e.g. by using decimals in many areas of mathematics. When teaching
about negative numbers, be especially sure not to use whole numbers only (i.e. -3, -4,
-10) but be certain to include a wide range of numbers ( -3.6, - 2/3, -0.01, -118.6) so that
the different concepts are juxtaposed. Paradoxically, keeping concepts isolated one from
the other can be a cause of confusion, rather than helping students to keep them separate
in their minds.
Negative thinkers may have forgotten about the decimal-fraction link; this having been
overtaken by interference from new knowledge, rather than have never having known
about it. Why should students confuse decimals and negatives? As noted elsewhere, the
place value names are, to an extent, symmetric around the ones column. This seems to
remind some older students of the way in which the positive and negative parts of the
number line are symmetric about zero. This may dispose some of them to interpret
decimals as negative numbers. (Click here for more information). Another way of
reducing this confusion is to use vertical as well as horizontal number lines.
To separate students using negative thinking from those using reciprocal thinking
requires the inclusion of comparisons with zero in a task. The Zero Test was devised to
do just this, and complements the original Decimal Comparison Test. Our research
data was collected using the original Decimal Comparison Test, however, so only the
combined incidence of these 2 groups can be reported, accounting for 5% to 8% of
students from Grade 5 to Year 10.
Apparent-expert behavior
Students in this category can generally decide which of two decimals is larger. Of
course, many of these students are true experts, with a good understanding of decimal
notation. Other students follow one of the two correct rules, (by equalizing with zeros or
comparing from left to right - see below) but discussion with them shows that the rules
are not supported by understanding. Others (such as the money thinkers and students
who have special difficulties with zero) may have good pragmatic skills, but in reality
very little understanding. A variety of tasks are needed to decide how much
understanding they possess. Our Australian research data shows that about a quarter of
Grade 5 students are experts but this rises to only about two thirds of Year 10 students.
Equalizing length with zeros is probably the most common strategy taught in Australian
schools, although it is used infrequently in other countries, such as Japan. To find out
which of two decimals is the larger, add zeros to the shorter until they have the same
lengths and then compare as whole numbers. For example, to compare 0.4 and 0.457,
add zeros to 0.4 to get three decimal places (0.400) and then compare 400 with 457. This
strategy always works for comparing decimals.
In our research, we have seen many well-taught children who correctly follow this rule
but talking to them reveals a wide range of misconceptions. They know the rule, but do
not understand it. Some will forget the rule fairly quickly if it is not taught with
understanding.
This correct strategy is to compare columns from left to right, until a digit in one
decimal is larger than the corresponding digit in the other (and the first will then be
larger than the second), OR until one decimal stops (which will then be the shorter one,
except in the case of zeros).
Like the other correct strategies, this strategy can be taught as a rule to follow without
understanding. The Hidden Numbers computer game enables a teacher to see whether
children are using this strategy.
Money thinking
Some students may appear to be experts, but in reality have very little understanding of
decimal place value and its fractional aspects. These students are usually able to deal
with decimals in everyday life because they understand one and two decimal place
numbers well. Many of these students relate them to money. For example, they think of
4.63 as 4 dollars and 63 cents. They think of 4.8 as 4 dollars and 80 cents. With this as a
model, they are able to carry out many tasks.
Money thinkers apparently have a good understanding of the first two decimal places,
but are not sure of the order of other numbers on the number line. One tertiary student,
for example, when asked to place numbers between 3.14 and 3.15 on a number line drew
this, not realizing that she had omitted 3.141, 3.142, 3.143 and 3.144:
She repeatedly omitted some numbers in several similar tasks, and admitted that she was
unsure of her answers. Furthermore, she had little idea about the general relationships
between the place value columns. Other students have told us that numbers such as 4.45
and 4.4502 are really equal. These students (in fact some are adults) may believe that the
extra digits on the end are 'mis-hits' and shouldn't really be there; in effect their number
system is discrete with integer numbers of cents. Click here to see a case study of 'Maria'
who relies on the analogy with money.
Not all of these students think of money - some have other similar models such as
percentages. Many of them will not realise that they have a problem with decimals. They
do not appreciate that there are an infinite number of decimals between any two others
(density).
Money is a useful but limited way of thinking about decimals. Using the money analogy
can mask misunderstanding. Care needs to be taken in teaching decimals with
money. Click herefor more information on money as an analogy for decimals.
Amongst the group of students who seem to be very good with decimals, there are some
who have particular trouble with zero. They may be able to correctly describe the
relative sizes of all decimals except when one is equal to zero, when they reveal that
they think that all "zero point something" decimals are less than zero. This may be
negative thinking (described above) but it can also be due to overgeneralisation of place
value ideas and confusion of the place value columns with a number line.
These students may observe that the number 0 belongs to the "ones" column in place
value terms, and since this column is to the left of the decimal columns (tenths etc) it is
larger than numbers such as 0.6, which start in the tenths. These students may think that
0.6 is less than 0, but may know that 0.6 is greater than 0.0 or 0.00 etc. For these
students, the whole number 0 is different from the decimal 0.0 or 0.00. This
demonstrates the importance of teaching which presents a variety of examples and
numbers in many forms. The Zero Comparison Test was created to detect any such
difficulties that students may have.
Often children hold a range of ideas - sometimes mutually contradictory - using them
according to circumstances. This makes diagnosing a child's difficulties more tricky, but
interesting. Partially formed ideas can change in the course of an interview with a
researcher or a discussion with a teacher.
The misconception categories described above account for a very large proportion
of the students. However, there are other ways of combining ideas and drawing
analogies with other learning that are not fully described in this summary (several
others are given by Stacey and Steinle (1998)) and others that may not yet be
known.
Some students complete tasks such as the Decimal Comparison Test using rather vague
guiding principles, which vary from item to item and from the beginning of the task to
the end. Thinking about the task may make them adjust their ideas, so their thinking at
the end of the task is different to that at the beginning. About 30% of students
completing the Decimal comparison Test seem to waver between ideas, so that their
thinking cannot be classified (Seeresearch data.)
http://www.apa.org/education/k12/alternative-conceptions.aspx
MATHEMATICS
Money
A correct understanding of money embodies the value of coin currency as
non-corre¬lated with its size.
Misconception: At the PreK level, children hold a core misconception about money and
the value of coins. Students think nickels are more valuable than dimes because nickels
are bigger.
Subtraction (Brown & Burton, 1978; Siegler, 2003; Williams & Ryan, 2000)
Correct understanding of subtraction includes the notion that the columnar order (top to
bottom) of the problem cannot be reversed or flipped.
Misconception #1: Students (age 7) have a “smaller-from-larger” error (miscon¬ception)
that subtraction entails subtracting the smaller digit in each column from the larger digit
regardless of which is on top.
143 83
-28 -37
125 54
Misconception #2: When subtracting from 0 (when the minuend includes a zero), there
are two subtypes of misconceptions:
Example:
At a university, there are six times as many students as professors. This fact
is represented by the equation S = 6P. In this equation, what does the letter
S stand for?
a. number of students (Correct)
b. professors
c. students (Misconception)
d. none of the above
Misconception #3: Equality Misconception
Correct understanding of equivalence (the equal sign) is the “relational” view of the equal
sign. This means understanding that the equal sign is a symbol of equivalence (i.e., a
symbol that denotes a relationship between two quantities).
Students exhibit a variety of misconceptions about equality (Falkner, Levi, & Carpenter,
1999; Kieran, 1981,1992; Knuth et al., 2005; McNeil & Alibali, 2005; Steinberg, Sleeman,
& Ktorza,1990; Williams & Ryan, 2000). The equality misconception is also evident in
adults, like college students (McNeil & Alibali, 2005).
a. Students do not understand the concept of “equivalent equations” and basic principles
of transforming equations. Often, they do not know how to keep both sides of the
equation equal. So, they do not add/subtract equally from both sides of the equal sign.
Example:
In solving x + 3 = 7, a next step could be
A. x + 3 – 3 = 7 – 3 (Correct)
B. x + 3 + 7 = 0
C. = 7 – 3 (Misconception)
D. .3x = 7
b. It is assumed that the answer (solu¬tion) is the number after the equal sign (i.e.,
answer on the right)
http://nationalstrategies.standards.dcsf.gov.uk/node/87495
Examine pupil A's responses to his work in class, which are shown below.
Question 4 above gets to the heart of pupil A's difficulties with decimals. What do his
responses reveal?
The response to question 11 above reveals another major conceptual error. What is it?
What significant misconception concerning the ordering of fractions does the above
demonstrate?
In a few sentences, summarise pupil A's difficulties with fractions and decimals.
There are two common reasons why pupils might believe this. Firstly, they feel that, say,
0.45 goes into hundredths while 0.7 only goes into tenths. Thus 0.45 < 0.7 because
'tenths are bigger than hundredths'. Secondly (and this is the reason that is suggested
here), they believe that 0.45 is analogous or equivalent to 1/45.
Pupil A shows in his answers that he does understand one meaning of the denominator
in a fraction. He sees 3/8 as involving the cutting of a cake into 8 parts. He seems,
however, to ignore the value of the numerator when comparing fractions.
Both pupil A's responses and the researcher's analysis are available for printing
from Extras.
http://www.math.uga.edu/~sybilla/05Fall5020/DecimalMisconceptions.pdf
The following list describes some of the misconceptions or difficulties children can develop about
comparing decimal numbers. The list is based on the work of mathematics education researcher
Kaye Stacey, who has gathered data on thousands of children in Australia. Longer is larger
Children with this misconception seem to treat the portion of the number to the right of the
decimal point as a whole number, thus thinking that 2.352 > 2.1 because 352 > 1. Longer is
larger with exceptions This misconception is the same as the previous one except in the case of
intervening zeros, so that children with this misconception correctly identify that 3.6 > 3.07.
Shorter is larger Children with this misconception think that fewer digits to the right of a decimal
point always makes a decimal larger. For example, they would think that 6.31 > 6.482. These
children reason that any number of tenths is greater than any number of hundredths and that any
number of hundredths is greater than any number of thousandths, and so on.Reciprocal or
negative reasoning Children with this misconception also think that fewer digits to the right of a
decimal point always makes a decimal larger but they use “reciprocal reasoning” or “negative
reasoning”, thinking, for example, that 0.2 > 0.3 because 12 >13 or because −2 > −3, since 2 < 3.
Reversal Children with this misconception “correctly” order decimals but then reverse their
answers, so that all their answers become incorrect. These children may view decimals as less
than zero. Experts to the hundredths Children with this difficulty correctly order decimals as long
as there are no entries below the hundredths. They may reason by thinking about money. They
are unsure what to do when there are entries in the thousandths place or below, for example,
they may not know how to compare 3.64 and 3.6402. Put the following set of decimal numbers in
order from least to greatest. Then show how children with the misconceptions described above
might put the numbers in order. 3.62 3.4102 3.41 3.401 3.4 3.3
Shorter is larger:
Reversal:
http://www.ugru.uaeu.ac.ae/UGRUJournal/UGRUJournal_files/SR5/MIN.pdf
1 1
Misconceptions in Numbers
Here, we identify and review certain misconceptions that are most common among
primary and
Of the four basic arithmetic operations addition seems to present students with the least
challenges. Two of the most common errors relate to the positioning of the numbers in
the vertical
presentation of the addition and the process of ‘carrying’. Both of these errors are
symptomatic
the fact that students would take the smaller digit from the larger irrespective of the
position of
543
- 237
= 314
Clearly, the student subtracted 3 from 7 because 3 was the smaller digit. Here, the
assumption is
will reduce the occurrence of such errors. Students should be made aware at an early
age of the
Of the four arithmetic operations, division presents students with the most challenges.
The first is
the belief that the divisor should always be smaller than the dividend. The extent of this
problem
was investigated by several researchers. Graeber and Baker (1992) put the following
question to
“Five pounds of trail mix was shared equally by fifteen friends. How many pounds
of
giving 3 as the answer. Perhaps more worrying was the fact that 42 percent of a sample
of sixtyfive trainee elementary school teacher trainees gave the answer 15÷5.
The source of this misconception lies clearly in the students’ early encounters with
division. Such
encounters are almost always in situations where a whole number has to be divided by
one of its
factors. Thus, for the children, ‘this kind of problem always goes like that, the little into
the big.’
Further research (Graber and Baker 1988) suggests that throughout KS2 and KS3
students
encounter very few instances where the divisor is greater than the dividend.
There is a wide range of common errors that students make when they encounter zero
in
arithmetic operations. Perhaps the most common is the problem that students have in
‘borrowing’
from zero in the process of subtraction. The use of zero in multiplication and division is
also the
source of a large number of mistakes and misconceptions among students of all ages.
Multiplying by zero
One of the most common mistakes involving zero is the failure by many students to
realise that
multiplying any number by zero yields zero. Rees and Barr (1984) found that 52% of
8613
This failure stems probably from the difficulty that many students have in interpreting a
Often students are confused when trying to decide whether to write or omit zero. They
are often
told that zero at the end of a decimal number has no value and therefore can be omitted
without
Similarly, when dividing 1632 by 8, students are taught not to write the ‘0’ that 3 divided
by 8
would yield and divide 16 by 8 instead. As a result, many students become confused
and are
unable to determine exactly when should zero be written and when it should be omitted.
Thus,
24
8 1632
It is not difficult to see the rationale behind the result. Since 8 does not divide into 3,
students
often move on to divide 8 into 32 to obtain 4. Thus the zero that should have been
written
More students have problems with decimals than with any other number concept. There
seems to
decimal numbers. It’s ‘as if the introduction of the decimal point changes the nature of
the
number in a fundamental way’. Brown (1981b, 1981c) found that about half of 12 year-
old
students and a third of 15 year olds have difficulties understanding decimal notation.
Difficulties with decimal numbers range from comprehending place value after the
decimal to
proper use of the algorithm of addition and subtraction. Rees and Barr (1984) found that
10 yearold primary school students provided 100 different answers to the following task:
UGRU Journal Volume 5, Fall 2007
3 3
The most common (wrong) methods used by students when adding decimals include:
• Adding the numbers before the decimal points and the numbers after the decimal
points
separately and combining them in any one of a number of ways to form a single number.
• Mistakes in aligning the numbers vertically and using the addition algorithm.
Multiplication and division of decimal numbers are even more challenging to students.
Common
Many problems with decimal numbers stem from facts learned or perceived when
working with
natural numbers. Many properties of natural numbers are mechanically extended to
other real
numbers, leading to many erroneous beliefs. Prominent among these is the widespread
belief that
multiplication should always yield a number that is necessarily higher than those with
which we
Thus for many students it seems inconceivable that 5 × 0.4 should give 2 since 2 is
smaller than 5.
In the same way, they find it hard to accept that 10 ÷ 0.1 gives 100 since 100 is much
bigger than
10? For many children, to make a number bigger, you have to multiply it and to make it
smaller
Why do many students believe that multiplication makes bigger? The reasons are
multiple. First,
many everyday language expressions imply that it is the case. When plants or animal
reproduce
we talk of multiplication. The word ‘multiple’ itself carries a sense of many or a great
number.
The second reason for this misconception has to do with the fact that many students first
two numbers indeed results in a larger number. A third reason for this misconception is
suggested
repeated addition. This view carries many secondary effects of which the most
prominent is that
multiplication makes bigger. Other secondary effects include the difficulty that students
have in
dealing with multiplication of fractions, and dealing with multiplication with small
numbers.
4. Fractions
Kerslake (1986) found that students of thirteen to fourteen years relied heavily on rote
memory of
previously learned techniques when working with fractions. She believes that this is
mainly due
to the fact that “fractions do not form a normal part of a child’s environment and the
operations
on them are abstractly defined”. This abstraction and lack of feel for fractions lead
students to
have many misconceptions about fractions. The most common of these misconceptions
involve
Research shows that on the whole students cope well with multiplication of fractions.
This is
probably due to the fact that the rule of multiplication of fractions seems natural: multiply
the
numerators together and the denominators together. Cramer and Bezuk (1991) found
that even
same research also concluded that students have little or understanding of the concept
of
multiplication of fractions. This is partly due to the fact that multiplication with whole
numbers is
often viewed and understood by students as a repeated addition. When confronted with
an
operation of the type
2/3 × 3/5
more on real situations involving a product of two fractions and the explication of why the
visualise a division of say, ¾ by ½. For most children, this kind of operation is simply
meaningless. In addition, often students fail to see the point or understand the logic
behind the
Addition of fractions poses a different sort of problem to children. While most will have
no
problems comprehending the meaning of ¼ + 2/3, often they will struggle to find the
right result.
When faced with the addition of fractions, often students choose the “easiest way out”.
Instead of
looking for equivalent fractions having the same denominator, they simply add the
numerators
and the denominators, thus using the following “rule”:
a+c
b+d
Hart (1981) found that 30% of 13 year olds were making this error, and notes that 15
year olds
were almost as likely to make this error as 13 year olds. This misconception is, at least
partially, a
Equivalent Fractions
example, if we wanted to know which is the larger of 3/5 and 4/7, one way of dealing
with this
would be to find fractions equivalent to the given ones, but having the same
denominator.
However, many students of all ages experience difficulties in their attempt to find
equivalent
fractions. Hart (1980) found that only 66 percent of 15 year olds could recognize that
3/10 was
larger than 1/5. In an American Survey (NAEP), only 3 percent of 13 year olds were to
finds
which of the fractions 1/4, 5/32, 5/16, 3/8 was nearest to 3/16. These results clearly
demonstrate
that students either do not know how to find equivalent fractions or do not make the
connection
5 5
Equivalence of fractions can also be used to find a fraction between two given fractions,
such as
1/2 and 2/3. Hart (1980) found that only 21 percent of 15 year olds were able to find
such a
fraction. Hart also found that students often do not realise that between two fractions on
the
number line there are many (infinitely many) fractions. The following table summarises
the
One 30%
Omit 17%
Brown (1981) confirms that students often do not know that the number line has no
‘empty
spaces’ when he asked students the question: ‘How many different numbers could you
write
5. Percentages.
Percentages, ratios and proportions present children, and indeed most people, with a
number of
challenges that appear quite daunting. Rees and Barr (1984) found that only half of a
sample of
8600 candidates could work out their new salary if their present salary increased by a
given
percentage. In another test, only 26% of twelve-year old students could work out how
much a pair
of jeans which normally costs £15 would cost after a 20% reduction. Thirty-three
different
answers were given to the question. The APU (1980) reports that only about half of 15
year olds
The wide range of answers shows that there is widespread confusion linked to
percentages. Any
fraction or a decimal.
CONCLUSION
Misconceptions abound in mathematics. They are picked throughout the educational life
of a
child. Some are inherent to the subject, others are the results of teaching techniques that
are difficult to overcome. Thus it is more important for teachers to make sure that the
misconceptions do not arise in the first place. First, teachers should be aware of areas
that have
the potential to generate misconceptions in the minds of the children. Then enough
work, and UGRU Journal Volume 5, Fall 2007
REFERENCES
Graeber Anna O. and Kay M. Baker Little into Big is the Way it Always Is, Arithmetic
Teacher,
April 1992.
Teacher’s guide to recent research, Holt, Rinhart and Winston for the Schools Council.
(1997)
Steffe, Leslie, P. & Olive John. “The Problem of Fractions in the Elementary School” The
Ward, M. (1979) Mathematics and the 10-year old, Working Paper 61, Schools Council.
Evans/Methuen
Resnick, L.B. (1982) Syntax and Semantics in Learning to Subtract. In Addition and
Subtraction:
A Cognitive Perspective (Ed) Carpenter, T.P. et al. New Jersey: Laurence Erlhaum
Kerlake, Daphne. Fractions: Students’ Strategies and Errors. Windsor, England: NEFR-
Nelson,
7 7
1991.
www.satuvemma.com/elizabeth/
Wrong solution:
-6 -5
= +30
Right solution:
- 6 -5
= -11
Let us now use this idea to solve the question above and other subsequent
questions involving operations on directed numbers. -6 imply I owe six
quantities, -5 also imply I owe five quantities. So therefore, I owe eleven
quantities altogether i.e. -11 (it is negative eleven because I still owe).
QUESTION 2: Simplify -1 + 5 - 2 - 3
Right solution:
-1 + 5 - 2 - 3
= -1
COMMENT: Using the "Owing and having rule". I owed one quantity (-) and I
have five quantities (+5), when I pay back the one quantity I owe, I will
have four quantities (+4) left. I owe a further two quantities (-2) and a
further three quantities (-3) which equals five quantities (-5). So, when I pay
back four quantities (which I already have), I'll be owing one more quantity
(-1). So therefore, the result is -1.
QUESTION 3: Simplify -3 x -2 x +2
Wrong solution:
-3 x -2 x +2
= -12
Right solution:
-3 x - 2 x + 2
= +12
COMMENT: This problem involves multiplication and the rule of signs must
apply. It is necessary to simplify the signs first before the numbers (figures).
- x -= +, the resultant + sign multiplied by the last + sign = +. Now to the
figures, 3 x 2 x 2 = 12. Therefore, the result is +12.
You can obtain an exciting e-book that has treated over 70 common mistakes
in mathematics by students at an introductory price
athttp://www.rocktech.biz/math.html. Claim a free sample of the math
ebook, free mathematics newsletters, free mathematics worksheets, access
to my mathematics blog immediately.
You can obtain an exciting e-book that has treated over 70 common mistakes
in mathematics by students at an introductory price
athttp://www.rocktech.biz/math.html. Claim a free sample of the math
ebook, free mathematics newsletters, free mathematics worksheets, access
to my mathematics blog immediately.
http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/resources/help/miscon4.pdf
http://www.experiencefestival.com/mathematics_-_common_misconceptions
These results and results from a research project (Roche & Clarke, 2004) indicate
some students misunderstand the decimal numeration system and that some
students use a rule to compare decimals possibly to the detriment of their
conceptual understanding. This rule provides a quick fix to students unable to
compare decimals accurately while continuing to encourage the "whole number
thinking" misconception. Also, students who are not dependent on this rule (and
successful in a decimal comparison task) are more likely to be able to solve more
difficult tasks involving the relative size of decimals.
A research project
http://chekguisza.blogspot.com/2010/03/perpuluhan-cara-menambah-nombor_27.html
Menambahkan
Seperti biasa, aktiviti penambahan di mulai dengan nombor yang paling kanan
dan bergerak kepada lajur sebelah kiri.
Penambahan nombor perpuluhan yang tidak sama rata
Jika nombor anda menambah tidak mempunyai jumlah yang sama digit ke kanan
titik perpuluhan, anda masih perlu menyusun titik perpuluhan dalam satu
garisan lurus sebelum menambah.
http://www.ied.edu.hk/primaryed/eproceedings/fullpaper/RN375.pdf
http://tlp.excellencegateway.org.uk/tlp/xcurricula/lmic/assets/documents/2175_17_sessio
n4_o.pdf
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29780579/Misconceptions-in-Math-Diagnostic-Teaching
http://books.google.com.my/books?
id=6DfkE5c4R3wC&pg=PA150&lpg=PA150&dq=misconception+of+decimal+in+subtr
action&source=bl&ots=mCx0pwbj3A&sig=aaMreYJi5YymyU7puSKjENEsnyg&hl=en
&ei=KqNrTe3DG83trQeIvPTCCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=
0CE0Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.scribd.com/doc/7786455/Misconception-in-mathematics
http://mathsisinteresting.blogspot.com/2009/08/misconception-of-percentage.html