You are on page 1of 1

It added that a Iemale civil servant had complained , in writing, to the commission that "the

committee was unlawIully attempting to revoke or withdraw an apartment which she duly
bought and paid Ior".

The payment, the civil servant said, was eIIected "through mortgage Iinance like other
beneIitting civil servants."

She said that her reIusal to obey an order by a senior oIIicer oI the Federal Capital Territory
(FCT), to share the said property with his relative, earned her a withdrawal letter on the
ownership oI the property, the statement added.

However, in its deIence, the committee claimed that the sale to the complainant was "being
withdrawn because the house sold to her did not Iall under the FGN non-essential residence
housing units".

The statement said that "in the Iianl recommendation submitted to the Federal Government, the
commission is convinced that by its conduct against the innocent civil servant, the present
committee should be dissolved and a new one constituted".

You might also like