In the sams\Old Testament, to which Kua A.M.Turing’s ae (
instance of a theological argument refers, there
(ase eo cuostion of one who, declaredslion sortdant we
noreupon this person got hinself
aul tudo ne tiation: (Eno,zeviii-16) « St.Thomas, Z
explains (that the ———~ (ar.
activity of the Bearer-of-light,averted “gz
fron the First One,was bont upon the many of Mintorior
ngs,and it was their primacy that he coveted”
Wibetalog,qai Seas?) Thought and action were fot
Fitted forsee ths cokabtntiom nova mits tedinousand
the ccaftered for-thelr ‘own-sakee| Now the sophist, oe
in-his-elaborate-ratiocinations} unrestrained by truth, 2
draws at will upon the infinite’ store of ens per acoldens al Blateesh
(including an: infinity of logics);thus contriv the 4
worst appear the better reason and make~t fi
that which is nostjeccthet/whatever there is most of
appears what nore fruly is, and nothing is but shat is not,
For instance,of lir.Smith not to montion. the events-composing they
bundle, there’ are far moré particles than mon on earth.The {f
ghoice'will therefore be simple,soeing that the many conveyed by) “~
_ 'anore bundle’ of fleeting Pocgurrences’ have far wore the
(> nature of sheer many than havo the integral parts of a Me
ow” totum per se. Hence,to meet the new standard of being,
at _cow nore guitable than to father the rational
7, anima as g mere bundle of occurrences rather than as.a
B substance or substances 36” -Lord-Russell_ence. ToL
J ¢-from-the-geltery;se| a "hopelessly
dies nuddle-headed notion? ny Seusieainernemwe. chat fo 1 has in oD ak
whidewweing that word,we Yght to agree with-him).
{ Accordingly, Yaa ‘Mr.Suith? becomes’ a collective ters;
yas in 'Hy name is-Legion.’ On the other hand,man,in the
1 | order of operation,is lowered to the level, of, a nore
* tool,and thus can do no more than serve;a tool,like any
instrunent,being of its nature movens motun,(A’ rather, strange
tool, at that instrument without a prinefpal
like’a sign dos not sloniiycot & relation adrift,
without terms; for the maker and agent is buried when one tool :
gives birth to another, seeing“tussell has shown itkuck something
to the effect that wa hay havo tools of tools and nothing but
tgols without endyso that everything nay vell be ip the, service
of nothing. )—hether or not we believe in Sacred Yoctrine is
not at present to the point. The plain fact remains that the
literature to which Turing refers sets forth a strophe for
yal which we have provided an antistrophe: we have echoed the
welt) yon servian) and the attending desire of primacy for the shoerest
many; not In the romantic way of Karl Marx quoting Aeschyles’s
Pronetheus,nor by merely enslaving “sone of these infernal
machines’ as E.TSell calls them) to do the repulsive drudgery; |
but in identifying science with the mechanical process itself
making what goes on in the computer to be one and the same wi:
the highest form of life,namely,thought. And it is worthy of note
that the keenest joy is éxpressed when such reductions are male.
Sinilarly,the scattering thought finds an entitative counter-part
in the nere bundles that are Mr.Smith,Barl Russell,etc.; a Sis zeke
that should be carried on and extended to the universe as a.
the supfene heap of bundles that outbundies them all. Russell, has
said that we may one day blow up tho universe,and he is appalled at
the horrible mem prospect. Yet,it being by nature already so much
out of joint,one can hardly seo what there is of the universe to explode,
or that it could nate, mich differonca;nor why any one should, relly
Gare,sceing that,to whatever there is’in the universe it wilt bo as
fz it had never been.Besides,it would all happen most legTo gy es aA] 38 te
Db Mi TINY og? WE
yn op
er wyi4 sf
a uo Loe u ai
quésec, Po.
sly 7h PP
vt
ooh “fei
=
<6
a3
EE
o 8
co
u 5
a
zé
5
yh, fy ep
paths 0 PY rer
foul
az Ley
nt gr Ty
wy vaales tap toed
sie 2 z
“er 4s"
igh
pray bas iiy ip need ‘uA
1 ripe engl Oe * Peal) | on Tad wheal
; Coun 209
20; 4
2 a
CABINET DU DOYENieanre Crcuhiee Hatt
i Ctfeteny Resarter 50 Ho. decly?
| Coc parte Mtl