You are on page 1of 39

) ( - 855 893 2008

ISSN 1726-6807, http://www.iugaza.edu.ps/ara/research/

-
- -

2007/4/8 : 2007/12/29 :

.
.


.
.

Importance and Advantaged of e- banking and Obstacles


Preveating Local Banks in Gaza Strip of Utilizing such system
Abstract: This study aims at recognizing the importance and the advantages
of e-banking and the problems preventing the local banks in Gaza strip from
utilizing electronic commerce and the Internet in their commercial activities.
The study has clarified that electronic banking is an important means that
attracts customers and assists the development of electronic commerce in
Palestine. A second outcome is that electronic banking is effective with
customers that are familiar with the internet. The advantages of using
electronic banking have been the reduction of costs, enlargement of
commercial transactions, easiness of access to local and international markets,
improvement of customer support, enabling services 24/7, time and effort
saving, data collection on competitors from the WebPages, reducing the need
to open new branches, improve the efficiency of the bank, and enabling the
provision of new banking services.

""

) .(2003
" "Internet

.
)(2004


.


.

.

.
: :

:
-1 ) (=0.05

.
856


-2 ) (=0.05
.

-3 ) (=0.05

.
-4 ) (=0.05
.
-5 ) (=0.05
)
(.

-1
.
-2 .
-3
.
-4
.
-5
)
(.

-
.
.
.
857

) .

(2003
:


) .(.org)www.arablow
:


" )(2004
: -:


.


) ( )(www.arablow.org
) on line/ ( :

" ) ( )

( ) (
) (




ATM )(2003

858

) ( pc

:

) (personal Financial management
)) Microsoft's Money )(Micas Managing Your Money

.
*


" "Terminals
)
( )(Out lets ). (2002
) (Huschke:
.
) (Virtual Bank


). (2002
: -:

2/6/1969

859

.
1972

) .(2001


.
: -:

.1 .

.2 .
.3 .

.4 .

.5 .
.6 .

.7 ) . (2004
.8 .

.9 .
.10

.11
.12 .

.13 ) .(2003
: -:

.1

) . ) (62 (32
) (57
.2

) .( www.bankofsudan.com

.
860


.3

.4

.5

.6

.7

.
.

.
.


) .(2001

: -:

.1
).

www.

(Islam on line .net


.2

.3 .

.4 :
). (2001

.5
.

.
.
:

) (2002
.1
.

.2
.

.3 .
.4 .

861

.
.5 .

.6 .

.7

.
.8 .
.9 .

: :

) (

: ):(Information

.
: ):(communicative

.
: ):(Transactional

.1

.
.2 ) ( )
.(26

.3
.

862


.4 ) .
2004.( 202

.5
%60

) .
(2002
.6

).
(2003

.7

.
.8 . :

.%20

. .9
) . . (2004

.10

On Line

.11
) . 2003.( 39

.12 :

863

.
-
.

-
.

-

.
-
.

).

(212-210
-14
). 2001
(350
-15
.
-16
.

-17
) . (213

-18
) 2001 (359
-19
.
-20
.

864


-21


) . (170
:

-1 (Operational Risk) :

.
) .(2002
System Security
.
System Design
.


.
-2 (Strategic Risk) :

).

(35



.
-3 ):(Reputation Risk

.
865

.
-4 ):( Legal Risk

) . 2002 .(267
-5 :

):(Yang,1997

" "



" "


.
) :(2000

"

"
.

.
.

.
.

866



. .

.
.
.
) :(2002

"

"
:

.
:

.

.

.
) :(2003

"


)( "

.

867

.
""
.


.
):Shah ,et al. (2005

"


.

.


.
):(Leelapongprasut et al (2005

) (


) ( .
:
: .


.
):(Khalfan, et al 2006


868


.
.








.
):(Khalid, et al 2006

:

.


.

.
:





869

.


.

60

43
50

48 ) (1
.
%10.4
%81.3 %8.3 .

%50.0 %12.5
%20.8 %16.7
. ) (1 %79.2
%20.8 . %16.7
25 %14.6 25 30
%27.1 30 35 % 41.7 35 .
%22.9 5 %35.4
5 10 %29.2 10 20
%12.5 20.
)(1



10.4
5

39

81.3

8.3

870

48
24

100.0
50.0

12.5

10

20.8

16.7

48
38

100.0
79.2

10

20.8

48
8

100.0
16.7

25 30

14.6

30 35

13

27.1

35

20

41.7

48
11

100.0
22.9

5 10

17

35.4

10 20

14

29.2

20

12.5

48

100.0

25

) (1
:
:

6
.
: :
871

.
:

6.

10.

: 5.

:
12.

39.




%80 %80 -60
%60 .
15
.
) (2
) (0.050.01
.

)(2

872

0.639

0.000

0.658

0.000

0.606

0.000

0.586

0.000

0.425

0.003

0.341

0.018

0.612

0.473

0.542

0.548

0.567

0.631

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.504

0.000

0.302

0.037

0.542

10

0.579

0.654

0.488

0.538

0.515

0.612

**

0.000

**

0.000

873

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

0.532
0.692

0.642

0.423

0.402
0.626
0.568
0.547

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.005

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.462

10

0.480

0.000

11

0.597

0.000

12

0.656

0.000

**
**
**

0.000

) (3
) 0.01 (0.05 .
)( 3

0.761

0.751

874


**

0.000

**

0.000

**

0.679

0.000

0.589

0.047

.
:


:
2
=
).(4
+1

) (4 0.01
.
:

) (4
.

)(4

0.6627

0.7971

0.000

0.7856
0.8865

10

0.7879

0.8814

0.7062
875

0.8278

0.000

*0.000

0.8791

12

0.6542

0.7909

*0.000

0.7943

** 0.01

.
:

SPSS


:
-1 .

-2

-3
.

-4 - ) (1- Sample K-S

-5 (One Sample T Test) t

-6 One Way ANOVA

) -( )(One Sample K-S


. ) (5
Z ) Z
)0.05

0.05

( sig.

876


)(5

1.053

0.217

1.057

0.214

0.819

0.514

0.640

0.807

0.901

0.391

t
t t
0.05 t

t 0.05
.0.05
.
: ) (=0.05


.
T ) (One Sample T test
) (6:

3 t t
47 0.05 1.96

.0.05
877

.



" "Internet
.
) (6 3.9583
" "3 t 10.45
t 0.00 0.05

)(6

)(5

37.5

43.8

14.6

2.1

2.1

4.1250

8.755

0.0

33.3

56.3

4.2

4.2

878

2.1

4.1458

9.337

0.0

)(5

14.6

60.4

20.8

2.1

2.1

3.8333

7.393

0.0

29.2

56.3

8.3

4.2

2.1

4.0625

8.553

0.0

33.3

43.8

10.4

10.4

2.1

3.9583

6.443

0.0

22.9

33.3

29.2

12.5

2.1

3.6250

4.147

0.0

3.9583

10.45

0.0

t 47 0.05 1.96
: ) (=0.05

T ) (One Sample T test


) (7:
879

.

3.9437 3 t t

47 0.05 1.96

.0.05



.


.

) :(time payments on

) :(convenient
.
) :(security & safety
. ) improve
:(cash flow .
. ) :(reduce paperwork

.
) .(moneysaving ):(customers satisfaction promotes
.
)( http://www.kenanah.com
) (7 3.9437
" "3 t

11.228 t 0.00 0.05



. ) (2002
880



.
)(7

)(5

18.8

50.0

22.9

6.3

2.1

3.7708

5.902

0.0

25.0

50.0

20.8

2.1

2.1

3.9375

7.547

0.0

35.4

58.3

4.2

0.0

2.1

4.2500

11.874

0.0

25.0

66.7

6.3

0.0

2.1

4.1250

11.082

0.0

45.9

47.9

4.2

881

0.0

2.1

4.3542

12.383

0.0

)(5

41.7

41.7

14.6

0.0

2.1

4.2083

9.855

0.0

16.7

54.2

22.9

4.2

2.1

3.7917

6.457

0.0

8.3

20.8

37.5

31.3

2.1

3.0208

148.

0.0

22.9

56.3

16.7

2.1

2.1

3.9583

8.057

0.0


10

22.9

62.5

10.4

2.1

2.1

4.0208

9.007

0.0

3.9437

11.228

t 47 0.05 1.96

882

0.0


: ) (=0.05

T ) One Sample T

(test ) (8:

) (8
4.0458 3 t t
23 0.05 2.0
.0.05
:


. ) (2002

" "

:
.

.
)(8

)(5

27.1

54.2

16.7

0.0

883

2.1

4.0417

9.046

0.0

)(5

27.1

43.8

25.0

2.1

2.1

3.9167

7.094

0.0

37.5

50.0

10.4

0.0

2.1

10.493 4.2083

0.0

33.3

39.6

18.8

6.3

2.1

3.9583

6.717

0.0

39.6

39.6

14.6

4.2

2.1

4.1042

8.047

0.0

4.0458

9.923

0.0

t 47 0.05 1.96
: ) (=0.05

T ) (One Sample T test


) (9 :
884


3.651 3 t
t 47 0.05 1.96

.0.05








. ) (2006






. ) (2006


) (Yang,1997 " "




" "


.
885

.
) (9 3.651

" "3 t 7.866


t 0.00 0.05
.
)(9

)(5

12.5

22.9

25.0

33.3

6.3

3.0208

0.125

0.901

14.6

31.3

37.5

10.4

6.3

3.3750

2.441

0.018

18.8

20.8

33.3

22.9

4.2

3.2708

1.641

0.108

18.8

39.6

27.1

886

12.5

2.1

3.6042

4.165

0.0

)(5

39.6

31.3

20.8

8.3

0.0

4.0208

7.230

0.0

27.1

39.6

18.8

12.5

2.1

3.7708

5.054

0.0

12.5

33.3

35.4

16.7

2.1

3.3750

2.648

0.011

41.7

33.3

10.4

10.4

4.2

3.9792

5.860

0.0

39.6

31.3

20.8

887

8.3

0.0

4.0208

7.230

0.0

)(5

10

20.8

54.2

18.8

6.3

0.0

3.8958

7.707

0.0


11

25.0

47.9

18.8

6.3

2.1

3.8750

6.471

0.0


12

22.9

37.5

18.8

18.8

2.1

3.6042

3.785

0.0

3.6510

7.866

0.0

t 47 0.05 1.96
-: ) (=0.05

)
(.

One Way
ANOVA ).(10
F
F
0.05

.

888


)(10

One Way ANOVA


3.8345

4.0682

3.9154

25
25

30
30
35

3.7848

3.8712
4.0173
**

1.188

20

0.325

3.7179

20

0.469

0.705

3.7803

3.9449

10

0.777

**

35

10

0.466

3.8333

3.8818

3.8485

3.7986
**

0.874
3.7922
4.0000

889

0.476

:
-

. -




.
- :


.
- :

.1 .
.2 .

.3
.

.4
.

.5
.

.6
.

.7
.
890


.8
.

.9
.

.10 .
.11 .

.1
.

.2
.

.3
.

.4 .

.5 .

.6 .

.7
.

.8 .

.9
.

.10
.

891

.1
. 2002

.2
. 2002

.3
.2002

.4 .2001
.5 .2003

.6
.2004

.7 :
.2004

.8 .2001

.9
.2002

.10
.2002

.11
.2004

.12
.2002

.13
.2002

.14
.2002

892


: :

" .(2000) . .1
.40 . ."

. . ." " .(2004) . .2

.35 . ." " .(2003). .3

" " .4
.2001

." " .(2003) . .5


www.mohamedsherif.vze.com .

: :
1. Kerem, K.(2003).Adoption of electronic banking : underlying consumer
behavior and critical success factors. Case study of Estonia, paper presented at
the 2003 conference of the technology and everyday life network, London,U.K.
retrieved

from

http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/EMTEL/conference/papers/kerem.pdf.
2. Khalid, k. & Abdallah, R. & Elrafe, E. Elbaset, E. (2006). "customer
satisfaction with internet banking web Site (Case study on the arab Bank)".
The Arab Academy for Banking and Financial Sciences, Jordan.
3. Leelapongprasut, P. Praneetpolgrang, P. Paopoun, N. (2005). A quality study
of internet banking in Thailand, international journal of the computers, the
international
and
management,
vol.13,
no.SP3
retrieved
from
http://www.ijcin.th.org/v13nsp3/pfd.
4. Shah, M. H. Branhganza, A. Khan, S. Xu, M. (2005) A survey of critical success
factors in e-banking, European and Mediterranean conference on information
systems,U.K,retrieved from http://www.iseing.org/emcis/EMCIS2005/pdfs/18.pdf.

5. Yang, Y. (1997). The security of electronic banking, presented at the national


information systems security conference U.S.A, retrieved from
http://csrc.nist.gov/nissc/1997/proceedings/041.pdf.

: :

.www.cycegypt.com Christian youth union .1

.www.bab.com ." " .


http://www.arriyadh.com/Economic/LeftBar/Titles/-----.doc_cvt.asp
.www.islamonline.net ." " .() .
.www.arablow.org ." " .() .
893

.2
.3
.4
.5

You might also like