Atlas of Log Responses

Lithology Gamma Ray & SP Resistivity Resistivity Bulk Density & Oil Based Mud Water Based Mud Neutron Porosity Acoustic Magnetic Resonance T2 Distribution Borehole Image
0.5 2000

Clay Bound

Capillary Bound

Low <= Amplitude/ Resistivity => High

30 API Oil

Shale Gas Sandstone

Shaly Sand Laminated Pay

Rh Rv

Oil Salt Water

Tuff Marine Shale Backup

Limestone

Marl

Dolomite

Fractured

RA Mineral Fractures

Conductive Fractures

Loss of Secondary Porosity

Anhydrite NaCI Salt KCI Salt

Gypsum

Anisotropic (Aeolian) Sand

Rh

Rv

Coal

Sandstone

Gas Oil Fresh Water

Anisotropic Shale

Rh

Rv

Granite

Lithology Sandstone Limestone

General Log Matrix Responses

GR Density
2.65 2.71 2.2-2.7
(water content)

Neutron
-4 0 High

Acoustic
53

Resistivity
High High low
(water content)

PE
1.81 5.08 1 -5 3.14 5.06

Low

(Unless RA min)

Low High Low

(higher if U)

47.5 50-150
(water content)

The Changing Face of Formation Evaluation

www.bakerhughesdirect.com formationevaluation@bakerhughes.com

Shale Dolomite Anhydrite Salt Water Oil

(water content)

2.87 2.98 2.03

(1.87)(

+4 -1 -3
(-2 )

43 50 67
(74)

High V.High V.High

V.Low Low
(Unless K salt)

4.65 0 - infinite
(salt & temp)

0 0 0

1-1.1
(salt & temp)

100 70-100
(H2 index) (

180-190 210-240 (api) ~1000

0.36
(+salt)

0.6-1.0
(api)
2

V.High V.High

Low Low

WE CANNOT, AND WE DO NOT GUARANTEE THE ACCURACY OR CORRECTNESS OF ANY INFORMATION ON THIS CHART. WE SHALL NOT BE LIABLE OR RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY LOSS, COST, DAMAGES OR EXPENSES WHATSOEVER I CURRED OR SUSTAINED BY THE CUSTOMER RESULTING FROM THIS N INFORMATION.
Compiled by Geoff Page and Simon Miller, Graphic design by Wendy McLachlan

Gas

0.2-0.5
(pressure) 2

10-50
(H2 index)

Baker Atlas INTEQ

FORMATION EVALUATION
2002 Baker Hughes Incorporated All rights reserved

Gas