UNITES STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEMAND FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS, DANIEL RILEY, Et al. 1:07-c1-189-GZS HEAR YE, HEAR YE, making a special appearance, Daniel Riley, acting ina sovereign capacity, Sui Juris, not Pro Se repeat not Pro Se representing the fiction DANIEL RILEY, and makes this motion, prima facie. In no way can this motion be construed to grant jurisdiction over the defendant, because the defendants counsel still contends no jurisdiction exist. Inno way should this motion be construed to be considered a contract, and all rights are reserved at the common law UCC 1-308 and 1-103.6 without prejudice. 1, As to Count One in the indictment the defendant’s counse] request the exact time and the exact place within the United States the defendant was to have alleged to have prevented Constitutional officers of the United States from capturing the Browns. 2. As to Count One if the indictment the defendant's counsel request the exactly by what means and how the defendant allegedly forcibly prevented Constitutional officers of the United States from capturing the Browns. 3. _Asto Count One in the indietment the defendant’s counsel request the exact names of the United States Constitutional officers that the defendant allegedly forcibly prevented from capturing the Browns. 4. Asto Count One in the indictment the defendant’s counsel request the exact lawful duty the Constitutional officers of the United State, in their official capacity as Constitutional officers of the United States, were allegedly forcibly prevented from doing by the defendant. 5. As to Count One in the indictment the defendants counsel request the exact time and dates to when the defendant was to have allegedly resided at the Browns home. 6. _Asto Count One in the indictment the defendant's counsel request exactly where, and what time and date that the defendant was to have allegedly declared publicly that he was going to forcibly resist the Constitutional officers of the United States from arresting the Browns. 7. Asto Count One in the indictment the defendant’s counsel request the exact time and dates that the defendant was to have allegedly; brought fire extinguishersto the home of the browns, brought a shotgun to the home of the Browns, and installed motion lights at the home of the Browns. 8. _Asto Count One in the indictment the defendant's counsel requests the exact time and date the defendant possessing rifles appeared in a picture with Ed Brown and the exact address of the internet website that this picture was to have been allegedly posted to. 9. Asto Count Two of the indictment the defendant’s counsel request the exact offense the defendant allegedly conspired to commit against the United States. 10. As to Count Two of the indictment the defendant's counsel request the exact time, date and the exact place within the United States the defendant was to have alleged to have committed this offense. 11. Asto Count Two in the indictment the defendant's counsel request the exact lawful duty the Constitutional officers of the United State, in their official capacity as Constitutional officers of the United States, were allegedly forcibly prevented from doing by the defendant 12, sto Count Three of the indictment the defendant's counsel request the exactly how, when, and where the defendant was to have allegedly received, relieved, comforted and assisted the Browifs in order to prevent their capture by Constitutional officers of the United States working in their official lawful capacity. 13. As to Count Four of the indictment the defendant's counsel request the exact time, date and place within the United States the defendant was to have allegedly carried a firearm and committed a crime of violence. 14, As to Count Four of the indictment the defendant's counsel request the exact time, and place within the United States, and the names of the Constitutional officers of the United States that the defendant was to have allegedly forcibly preveated from capturing the Browns. The defendant” counsel submits this bill of particulars to assure a proper defense can be constructed. In no way should this motion be construed to consenting jurisdiction over the defendant because the defendant maintains that this administrative tribunal has no jurisdiction over the defendant.DATED: December 17, 2007 266 County Farm Rd Dover NH, 03820 All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice CC: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NEW HAMPSHIRE AUSA Robert Kinsella David Bownes Stanley Norkunas Paul Garrity