You are on page 1of 2

EX/2-STAT/11/68/07

INTER B. Sc. EXAMINATION, 2007 (2nd Semester ) MATHEMATICS STATISTICS (Subsidiary) PAPER11Stat
Time : Two hours Answer any three questions. Two marks are reserved for neatness. [ Notations and symbols have their usual meanings ] 1. In a simple random sampling without replacement, prove that (a) E ( ) = x (b) Var ( ) = x
1 (n

Full Marks : 50

2 ) N1

(c) Var ( ) V x where V is the variance of for simple random sampling x with replacement. 2. 4+8+4

Define the sample mean st for stratified random sampling x which gives an unbiased estimate of the population mean. For this sample mean st , prove that var ( st ) is minimum x x for fixed total size (n) of the sample if ni is proportional to Ni

for all i = 1, 2, ... , k.

16 [ Turn Over ]

( 2 ) 3. a) Prove that the sample mean for systematic random sampling is an unbiased estimate of population mean. b) If

( 3 )

A 518 D 522 B 515 C 522

C 521 B 512 A 520 D 521

D 525 A 515 C 523 B 510

B 511 C 519 D 524 A 517 16

xsys is the sample mean for systematic random

sampling, prove that 2N 1 nk 1 . { 1 + ( n 1) P }, . Var ( sys ) = x n nk where P is the interelass correlation coefficient. 4+12 4. a) b) x x Prove that Var( )|R Var( st )|P Var( st )|N x The following table shows the percentage of growth per unit area of a certain variety of wheat in a particular type of soil treated with chemicals A, B and C. A B C 8 7 9 9 9 11 10 8 10 9 8 10

8+8

Can we reject the null hypothesis of equal mean at 0.05 significance level ? [ F0.95 (2, 9) = 4.26 ] 5.

Consider the results given in the following table for an experiment involving four treatments A, B, C, D in four randamized blocks. Test whether the treatments differ significantly. Given that F0.95 (3, 6) = 4.76.

You might also like