Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Article 114

    Uploaded by

    VHine CabSaba BiBat
    19 views1 page
    "The two-witness rule is not required to prove adherence to the enemy" "treason absorbs crimes committed in the furtherance thereof" "righteous action, as when the collaborator also helped save some guerrillas from death at the hands of the invader is illogical and baseless"

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    "The two-witness rule is not required to prove adherence to the enemy" "treason absorbs crimes committed in the furtherance thereof" "righteous action, as when the collaborator also helped save some guerrillas from death at the hands of the invader is illogical and baseless"

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    19 views1 page

    Article 114

    Uploaded by

    VHine CabSaba BiBat
    "The two-witness rule is not required to prove adherence to the enemy" "treason absorbs crimes committed in the furtherance thereof" "righteous action, as when the collaborator also helped save some guerrillas from death at the hands of the invader is illogical and baseless"

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Article 114.

    TREASON The details of the testimony on the acts testified by witnesses need not be identical (People vs. Abad) The two-witness rule is not required to prove adherence to the enemy (People vs. Alitagtag) Treason absorbs crimes committed in the furtherance thereof (People vs. Villanueva) Righteous Action, as when the collaborator also helped save some guerrillas from death at the hands of the invader is illogical and baseless (People vs. Victoria) Defense of Suspended Allegiance by reason of change of sovereignty was untenable since a citizen owes an absolute allegiance to his country (Laurel vs. Misa)

    You might also like