You are on page 1of 21

( )

Mokhtarzadeh.hossein@gmail.com
()

()

()

()

:

:
55651166-55651166 :
55666666 :
farahmand@sharif.edu :



. 9 7 5 .
-
. T
T .

.
(
)
.

: .


" " .
[ .]6

.

.
[ .]4 6 6

.

)6997( Kule Mejovek .
[ .]1

. 56

Ariel ( APAS

)Performance Analysis System


. )6999( Shiang Chiu () 66
ROC [ .]5

6

.
.
Robertson ( )6666 ( )
( ) [ .]7
.

.

.
.

.

65
. ( 9
) ( 7 5) .
6 .
-6

()

()

()

66/66

675

59/55

6/44

5/74

7/47

66/641

674/64

74/41

6/764

9/661

9/566


. 1 .
( -6) .
96
96 ( -6) .
.
( -6) . .

:6

Maei Geri

( ) .
( )
.

.
.
6 .
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( .)6
. 6
( ) .
JVC GR-DVL 9800 16 ( )Deinterlacing .
4/1 46 .

. 6*6/6*6/6 .
6 .

:6

1SMA .

.
2DLT .
6 .

Sharif Motion Analyzer

Direct Linear Transformation

:A

:B

:C

:D

:F

:G

:H

:I

:E

:6 (-) ( -)
()

.
- - -
.
:
)

x1 x 2
) (x 1 x 2 ) ( y 1 y 2 ) (z 1 z 2

( cos

z y x
z y x . .

.
spline
( %6)
( %666) . ( (SPSS .
T 1
T 2 . ( )Z

Compare mean, Independent - sampleT-test

Pair sample T-test

( )X

4 9 .
4
. .
( )
. .
%56 ( )
.
.
6/6659 6/6666
.

)Maei Gery GH Vertical displacement (Mean

0.01

expert
non-expert

0
100

80

60

40

20

0
-0.01
-0.02

)Displacement/Height (mm/cm

0.02

-0.03
normalized duration

:4 ( )Z

1
.
. %56( ) (%666
)
( .)=6/66
.
6/55 5/66 .

66

)Maei Gery GH Frontal displacement (Mean


6

0
expert

100

80

60

40

20

0
-3

non-expert

-6

)Displacement (cm

-9
-12
normalized duration

:1 ( )X

5 .

.
( ) .

( %6 %66)
( .)=6/666 %66
( .)=6/665 .

66

)Maei Gery Ankle Angle (Mean


50
40

expert

20

non-expert

10

)Angle (degree

30

0
100

80

60

40

20

-10

normalized duration

:5

7
. .
( 61 -6) 71 666
.
.
1/65
5/79 .
. 5/44
66/19 .

66

)Maei Gery Knee Angle (Mean


80
60

expert

20

non-expert

0
100

80

60

40

20

)Angle (degree

40

0
-20
-40

normalized duration

:7

4
. .
( %76)
( ) .
.
. %666 %16
5/59 66/64
4/95 67/74 .

66

)Maei Gery Hip Angle (Mean


10
0
100

80

60

40

20

-20
expert

-30

non-expert

-40
-50

)Angle (degree

-10 0

-60
-70
-80
normalized duration

:4

9
. .
( -6) ( -6)
. .
( 14/1 4/6 ) ( 55/5
6/4 ) ( .)=6/666
. %56
4/96 69/57 .

64

)Maei Gery Shank (Mean


180
160

expert

120

non-expert

100
80

)Angle (degree

140

60
40
100

80

60

40

20

normalized duration

:9



[ .]4-66
. ( 16 )

( 666 ) .
( )
.

( )6

.
.

61


( .)1 4 ( )
( )
.
( )5
.
( %6 %66)
.
.
(
) (
.)9 %6 %56 .

.
(
)
.
(

65

) .
.

.
5
.
.

.

.


.
.
.

67

:
1- Corcoran J., Microsoft Encarta Reference Library 2004. 1993-2003 Microsoft Corporation.
2- Pingali G., Opalach A., Jean Y., Carlbom I., Visualization of Sports using Motion Trajectories: Providing
Insights into Performance, Style, and Strategy. 12th Annual IEEE Visualization Conference (Vis2001), San
Diego, California, USA, October 21-26, 2001.
3- Ringer M., Lasenby J., Modeling and Tracking Articulated Motion from Multiple Camera Views. The 11th
British Machine Vision Conference, University of Bristol 11-14 September 2000.
4- de Meneses Y. L., Roduit P., Luisier F., Jacot J., Trajectory Analysis for Sport and Video Surveillance,
Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis 5(3):148-156, 2005.
5- Kule B., Mejovek M., Kinematika i dinamika analiza karate udarca ushiro mawashi geri. Kineziologija
(0351-1057) 2 (1997), 29; 40-46, http://bib.irb.hr/prikazi-rad?rad=30362&table=casopis
6- Chiu H.T & Shiang T.Y., A New Approach to Evaluate Karate Punch Techniques Abstracts from ISBS
Symposium XVII 1999, http://www.education.ed.ac.uk/isbs-arc99/8.htm
7- Robertson D.G.E., Fernando C., Hart M. and Beaulieu F., Biomechanics of the karate front-kick. Has been
seen at http://www.health.uottawa.ca/biomech/lab/docs/wcb4_gr.pdf.
8- Farahmand F., Rezaeian T., Narimani R. and Hejazi Dinan P., Kinematic and dynamic analysis of the gait
cycle of above-knee amputees. International journal of science and technology; Scientia Iranica. 13 (3), 2006.

- 9

.6645 46-44 :67
10- M.Hoviattalab, R.Narimani and A. Mirbagheri, An Investigation on Human vibration Analysis Using Image
Processing Method, Proceedings of ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences &
Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE, Long Beach, California, USA , Sep. 2428, 2005.
11- Narimani R., Hoviattalab M., Abadpour A. and Yadolahi A., Vibration Measurement And Analysis Using
Image Processing Method, proceedings of the 7th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and
Analysis, ESDA, Manchester, UK, July 19-22,2004.
12- Kolahi A., Hoviattalab M., Rezaeian T., Alizadeh M., Bostan M. and Mokhtarzadeh H., Design of a markerbased human motion tracking system, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 2007; 2(1): 59-67.

64

69

Abstract:
The kinematic variables of the Maei-Gary technique were studied and compared in two
groups of top-expert and practiced karatekas. The subjects included 9 members of the national
team and 7 karatekas with at least 6 years experience. The measurement was conducted using
stereo-videography and the 3-D coordinates of the reflective markers attached to the
anatomical landmarks were traced during motion. The statistical analysis was performed
using independent sample T-test for comparing groups mean and pair sample t-test for inter
group comparison. Results indicated well observation of some details of the motion pattern by
top-expert group, including maintaining the height and angulation of trunk before and during
kick, the 3 phased plantar flexion of the ankle joint, and maintaining the orientation of the
shank before kick, which were neglected by the practiced group. Also, comparison of the
standard deviations of the variables within the two groups revealed that the motion (including
the trunks vertical movement and rotation, and the ankle, knee and hip joints angular
variation) has been conducted with a higher degree of similarity within the top-expert group;
this was mostly significant for the motion of knee joint.

Key Words: Kinematic Analysis, Stereo-videography, Karate, Maee Gary

66

You might also like