Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outer Diameter
rim angle
Outer diameter of tube Efective aperture area Absorber tube area 0.047731 m (W-Do)L 3.145*Do * L 47.73074405 mm 8.786540031 m 0.549158752 m^2 0.156597
Aperture area
Absorber innerdiameter Glass cover Outer diameter Glass cover Inner diameter Specular reflectivity of concentrator surface Glass cover transmissivity for solar radiation Glass cover emissivity/absorptivity Absorber tube emissivity/absorptivity Intercept factor Date Time Hourly beam radiation Hourly global radiation Ambiant Temperature wind speed Mass flow rate of Thermic fluid Inlet Temperature LAT() Angle of incidence @ April 15 () Hour angle () Slope of apture plane() Angle of incidence
0.0381 m 0.063 m 0.056 m 0.85 0.85 0.88 0.95 0.95 15-Apr 12.5 705 949 30 5.3 0.0986 150 11.92 9.414893347 16.94418733 9.494661091
38.1 mm 63 mm 56 mm
1230 h
105 th day
303 K
0.991445 Deg
13.5 w/m^2 K
W/m^2 W W C
463.7714 K
Calulate "U" CORRESPONDING TO THIS VALUE OF Tpm and show that it is equal to the assumed value.
78.5 C
134.6356941 C 0.03526 w/m k 2.45E-05 m^2/s 0.7 0.004134628 2.22E+02
351.5 K
407.6357 K
300 K
3.86E+00 0.542577 5.017233929 w/m k 325.75 K 0.027 w/m k 1.60E-05 m^2/s 1.58E+04 6.83E+01 29.2746592 W/m^2 K 310.3233894 w/m 294 K 323.2741804 w/m
27 C
Convective heat transfer coefficent absorber tube and the glass cover(hp-c)
Mean temperature of air between the cover and ambient Properties of air Thermal conductivity Kinamatic viscosity Rynolds number Nusult number Heat transfer coefficent outside surface of cover(hw) Overall heat coefficent Sky Temperature AND
52.75 C
21 C
The two values of q/l match with each other.the corresponding value of "U"
which also matches the original guess
13.39247 w/m^2 k
162.08841 C
Equating heat gained by the fluid to the useful heat gain rate(Exit Temperature)
Aperture area :
Advantages
1 Main advantages of linear Fresnel are its lower investment and operational costs. Firstly,the flat mirrors are cheaper and easier to produce then parabolic curved reflectors and so are readily available from manufacturers worldwide. 2 The struture also has a low profile, with mirrors just one or two meters above groud. This means the plant can operate in strong wind and it can use a lightweight,simple collector structure. 3 Linear Fresnel collectors also make more efficient use of land, packing more mirrors closer together compared to parabolic through. The collectors also easier to maintain since they have fewer moving parts and they can turn down during the night for protection from sand and to allow for automated cleaning. 4 The three leading versions of linear Fresnel technology generate steam directly, which means they do away with the need for expensive and performance-reducing heat exchangers. 5 Linear fresnel technology costs between 50 to 60% of costs of a parabolic trough collector per square metre. 6 A linear solar fresnel solar plant can be hybridized with fossil fuel backup to be used for electrical generation when the sun isn't shining. 7 The absorber tube is simpler and less expensive than that of the parabolic trough system, because multiple solar mirrors reflect solar power to a single absorber tube and the absorber tube doesn't need couplings as the receiver tubes for the parabolic trough and parabolic dish systems do, because the absorber is fixed.
Disadvantages
1 A linear solar fresnel solar plant doesn't produce a fluid temperature as high as the parabolic trough or parabolic dish solar concentrators, so its thermal efficiency for conversion of solar power to electricity is lower.
Absorber area : the area of absorber Aperture area : the area in which solar radiation enter the collector Gross area: the area based on outer dimention of collector