Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6 96. 240 6
11
.0 332 3
1 25 21
(b) (7)(E)
15 25 2.6 2
15 90 0 .8
5. 6 23
857 4.
8. 7 71
54 8
2 1. 75 17 2
102 98
2 19
.2 9
92
.2 5
12 28 5.5 9
443 4. 29 2
731
2 81. 202
671
938
7 7. 74 16
5. 1 12
195 4 . 57 2
112 70 .72
600 5.
259 5 . 33
5 4 .1 43 18 21 1. 75 17
61
782 9.7 9
505 535 4. 96 2
13 3
374 2 .7
1237
7 .6 74 16
9
90 15 0.8 7
(b) (7)(E)
52 152
.6 1
3 1471
.59
1 133 8. 5 2
28 12
782
5.
58
8 .2 98 2 10
11 27 0. 71
2
9. 7 97
671
5. 1 11
232.3
74
489 .38
.5 3
18
09
Legend
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
857 4.5 4
5354.961
6005.504
93 85
731 8 .7
.62
V a ria b le
D e si g n F l o w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 8 .1 6 5 .9 4 % 0 .8 7 15539 M X 1 5 7 .9 5 -5 . 2 7 %
E X IS C O N D 1 5 7 .9 5 0 .8 9 15532
Im p a c t US 0 .9 4 % 7
C o n c lu s io n : A l l c r i t e r ia m e t o n M e x i c o s i d e . O n U S s i d e , w a t e r s u r f a c e D e si g n F l o w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e l e v a t i o n c r i t e r i a m e t . E x c e e d s d e f l e c t i o n c r it e r i a b y 0 . 9 4 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d i ti o n w / n o flo w th r o u g h fe n c e . F l o o d p l a i n e x p l a n d s b y o n l y 7 ' . T h e im p a c t i s l i m i t e d t o D e si g n F l o w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n a g r ic u lt u r a l la n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l a l l o f w h i c h a r e l o c a t e d in e x is t i n g f l o o d p la i n . N o n e w h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n th e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . s t r u c t u r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
U.S.A.
374 2. 76 1
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 3742.mxd
FME006180
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006181
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006182
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006183
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006184
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006185
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006186
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006187
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
(b) (7)(E)
FME006188
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006189
(b) (7)(E)
(b) (7)(E)
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006190
(b) (7)(E)
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006191
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006192
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006193
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006194
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006195
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006196
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006197
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006198
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006199
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006200
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006201
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006202
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006203
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006204
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006205
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006206
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd
FME006207
O2 Fence Alignment
1 2 3 4 5
6
(b) (7)(E)
10 11 12 19 13 14 20 15 21 16 22
23
24
25
26
27 28
Legend
IBWC Fence Alignment Proposed Fence Alignment
Date: 01/22/2009
3,750
5,000 Feet
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments.mxd
FME006208
.02
(b) (7)(E)
305 74
300 78
293 20
279 4 8.
75
.45
1 25 21
21 1. 28 20
6 6 .2 .1 92 2 34 19 84 1
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
265 89
15 90 0 .8
.61
.69
nt - RS: 17751.22
2847 8
258 87.8
5. 6 23
857 4.
8.7 7 1
54 8
2729 3.11
50 212
.2 81 202
17
671
443 4. 29 2
731
12 28 5.5 9
.15
253 56
102 98
240
13 3
4 18
112 70 .72
782 9.7 9
96.
18
.1 34
600 5.
505 535 4. 96 2
374 2 .7
.5 3
66
259 5 .33
9
1237
4 32.37
195 4 .57 2
61
2 .2 29 19
.2 9
938
22 1. 75
.7 47 67 1
5. 1 12
(b) (7)(E)
17 75 1. 21
47
.6
3 .5 9 147 1
1 15 2
4. 5 4
133
5 18 .
16 7
52
.6
9. 7 9
857
00
15 9
782
671
5. 1 11
.8
8 .2 98 2 10
4434.291
11 27 0. 71
93 85
731 8 .7
.62
5. 28 12
58
2
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
76
V a ria b le
D e sig n F lo w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P C O ND M X US 1 5 9 .6 1 5 .3 2 % 0 .5 7 12942 M X 1 5 9 .5 5 -5 . 1 5 %
E X IS C O N D 1 5 9 .8 5 0 .6 5 12993
Im p a c t U S 0 .3 2 % -5 1
C o n c lu s io n : A ll c r i t e r ia m e t o n M e x i c o s i d e . O n U S s i d e , w a t e r s u r f a c e D e si g n F l o w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e l e v a t i o n c r it e r i a m e t . E x c e e d s d e f l e c t i o n c r it e r i a b y 0 . 3 2 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d i ti o n w / n o fl o w th r o u g h fe n c e . F l o o d p la i n d e c r e a s e s . T h e i m p a c t i s l i m it e d t o a g r i c u l t u r a l la n d , D e si g n F l o w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , a ll o f w h ic h a r e f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l l o c a t e d i n e x i s t i n g f lo o d p l a i n . N o n e w s t u c t u r e s a d d e d ; h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n t h e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
U.S.A.
.2 51 77 1
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 17751.mxd
.380
1 1954.57
2595.338
374 2.
(b) (7)(E)
FME006209
03
1 25 21
21 1. 28 20
26 6 2. .1 29 34 19 84 1
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
15 90 0 .8
5. 6 23
857 4.
8.7 7 1
54 8
50 212
.2 81 202
2 .2 29 19 5
17
671
443 4. 29 2
731
12 28 5.5 9
102 98
.2 9
938
22 1. 75
. 47 67 1
5. 1 12
195 4 .57 2
112 70 .72
782 9.7 9
13 3
4 .1 43 18
600 5.
505 535 4. 96 2
374 2 .7
.5 3
18
259 5 .33
1237
17 75 1. 21
47
.6
3 .59 147 1
1 15 2
(b) (7)(E)
52 18.
16 7
52
.6
4. 5 4
504
5. 1 11
961
600 5.
9. 7 97
535 4.
15 9
671
443 4.2
.8
857
00
91
133
782
11 27 0. 71
93 85
731 8 .7
.62
.5 85 22 1
8
28 8. 29 10
2
1232 .3
74
Legend
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
V a ria b le
D e si g n F l o w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 9 .3 3 5 .1 4 % 1 .7 3 12918 M X 1 5 8 .9 4 -5 . 5 0 %
489 .3 80 9
61
71 1954.5
2595.338
374 2.7 6
E X IS C O N D 1 5 9 .3 0 .9 5 12913
Im p a c t US 0 .1 4 % 0 .7 8 5
D e si g n F lo w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e l e v a t io n c r i t e r i a m e t . E x c e e d s d e f l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a b y 0 . 1 4 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d iti o n w / n o fl o w th r o u g h fe n c e . F l o o d p l a in e x p la n d s b y o n l y 5 ' . T h e i m p a c t i s l i m i t e d t o D e si g n F lo w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n a g r ic u lt u r a l la n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l a l l o f w h ic h a r e l o c a t e d i n e x i s t i n g f l o o d p l a in . N o n e w s t u c t u r e s h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n t h e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
C o n c lu s io n : A l l c r i t e r ia m e t o n M e x i c o s id e . O n U S s i d e , w a t e r s u r f a c e
U.S.A.
14 71 3 .6
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 14713.mxd
(b) (7)(E)
FME006210
.03
1 25 21
21 1. 28 20
26 16 2. 4. 29 43 19 18
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
15 90 0 .8
5. 6 23
857 4.
8.7 7 1
54 8
50 212
.2 81 202
2 .2 29 19 5
2 .2 51 77 1
671
443 4. 29 2
938
. 47 67 1
12 28 5.5 9
102 98
.2 9
731
5. 1 12
195 4 .57 2
61
112 70 .72
782 9.7 9
13 3
4 .1 43 18
600 5.
505 535 4. 96 2
374 2 .7
.5 3
18
259 5 .33
1237
17 75 1. 21
(b) (7)(E)
.6
3 .59 1471
1 15 2
47
133
52 18.
16 7
52
.6
00
15 9
9. 7 97
671
5. 1 11
.8
782
4434.291
85 74 .54
8 .2 98 2 10
5354.961
6005.504
11 27 0. 71
93 85
731 8 .7
.62
. 85 22 1
58
2
1232 .3
74
Legend
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
V a ria b le
D e sig n F lo w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 9 .2 6 7 .0 3 % 2 .1 8 13257 M X 1 5 8 .7 4 -1 0 . 9 3 %
489 .38
09
71 1954.5
2595.338
374 2.7 6
E X IS C O N D 1 5 8 .9 3 0 .9 4 13196
Im p a c t U S 0 .9 6 " 2 .0 3 % 1 .2 4 61
U.S.A.
13 31 8 .5
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 13318.mxd
FME006211
(b) (7)(E)
03
1 25 21
1 .2 81 02 2
26 16 2. 4. 29 9 43 1 18
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
15 90 0 .8
5. 6 23
857 4.
8.7 7 1
54 8
50 212
.2 81 202
2 .2 29 19 5
22 1. 75 17
671
443 4. 29 2
938
. 47 67 1
12 28 5.5 9
102 98
.2 9
731
5. 1 12
195 4 .57 2
112 70 .72
782 9.7 9
13 3
.1 34 84 1
600 5.
505 535 4. 96 2
374 2 .7
.5 3
18
259 5 .33
1237
(b) (7)(E)
17 75 1. 21
47
.6
3 1471
1 52 .6 15 2
.59
133 52 18.
16 7
4. 5 47 9. 7 97
504
857
5. 1 11
.8
600 5.
782
535 4.
00
15 9
671
961
8 .2 98 2 10
4434.291
11 27 0. 71
93 85
731 8 .7
.62
.5 85 22 1
1232 .3
Legend
74
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
V a ria ble
De sig n F low w ith Im pe rm e a b le Fe n ce EX IS CO ND 158.28 1.14 13040 P RO P CO ND MX US 159.1 5.73% MX 158.21 -9.93% 1.26 13064
De sign Flow w ith Fe n ce a s P o st EX IS CO ND 158.02 9.84 22160 P ROP CO ND 158.02 0 9.84 22160
489 .3 80 9
61
71 1954.5
2595.338
374 2.7 6
Im p a ct
W a te r S urfa ce Ele va tio n (fe e t) De fle ction O ve rba nk V e locity (fps) o n US S ide F loo dp la in W idth (fe e t) Re m a rks: De sign Flow = 240,000 cfs, S ou rce : US IBW C
0 0 0 0
C on clu sion : All criteria m et on Mexico side. On U S side, exceeds deflection criteria b y 0.73% an d De sign Flo w w / Im p e rm e a ble F e n ce re p re se nts w ater surface elevatio n criteria b y 3.84" . F lo od plain expand s b y on ly 24' and conse rva tive con dition w / no flo w throug h fe n ce . De sign Flo w w / Fe n ce re p re se n te d a s po st in velo city increases b y 0.12 fps. T he im p act is lim ited to ag ricultural lan d, natural area flood pla in a llow ing fre e flow th rou gh fe nce . T he a ctua l op en space, and a few stru ctu res, all of w h ich are lo cated in th e existing flo od plain . h ydra u lic im p a ct w ill lie b e tw e e n the se tw o situa tion s. N o n ew stru ctures ad ded; therefore, no im pact to U S .
U.S.A.
112 70 .72
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 11270.mxd
FME006212
(b) (7)(E)
15 90 0 .8
1 .2 81 2 20
26 16 2. 4. 29 9 43 1 18
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
5. 6 23
857 4.
8.7 7 1
54 8
50 212
.2 81 202
2 .2 29 19 5
22 1. 75 17
671
443 4. 29 2
938
7. 74 16
12 28 5.5 9
102 98
.2 9
731
5. 1 12
195 4 .57 2
112 70 .72
782 9.7 9
13 3
.1 34 84 1
600 5.
505 535 4. 96 2
374 2 .7
.5 3
18
259 5 .33
1237
17 75 1. 21
47
.6
3 1471
1 52 .6 15 2
.59
133 52 18.
(b) (7)(E)
4. 5 47 9. 7 97
16 7
504
857
5. 1 11
.8
600 5.
782
535 4.
00
15 9
671
961
8 .2 98 2 10
4434.291
11 27 0. 71
93 85
731 8 .7
.62
.5 85 22 1
1232 .3
Legend
74
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
V a ria b le
D e sig n F lo w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P R O P C O N D M X U S 1 5 8 .9 1 5 .3 6 % 1.33 13229 M X 1 5 8 .2 3 -9 .1 6 %
489 .3 80 9
61
71 1954.5
2595.338
E X IS C O N D 158.31 1 .0 4 13187
374 2.7 6
Im p a ct U S 1 .2 " 0 .3 6 % 0 .2 9 42
C o n c lu s io n : A ll c r it e r ia m e t o n M e x ic o s id e . O n U S s id e , e x c e e d s d e f le c t io n D e si g n F l o w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts c r it e r ia b y 0 .3 6 % a n d w a t e r s u r f a c e e le v a t io n c r it e r ia b y 1 .2 " . F l o o d p l a i n e x p a n d s b y o n l y 4 2 ' a n d v e l o c i t y i n c r e a s e s b y 0 .2 9 c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d i ti o n w / n o fl o w th r o u g h fe n c e . f p s . T h e i m p a c t is l i m i t e d t o a g r i c u l t u r a l l a n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n D e si g n F l o w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , a l l o f w h i c h a r e l o c a t e d in t h e e x i s t i n g f l o o d p l a in . N o n e w s t r u c t u r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e tw e e n th e se tw o si tu a ti o n s. im p a c t t o U S .
U.S.A.
102 98. 29
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 10298.mxd
(b) (7)(E)
FME006213
6 96 . 6
240
14 232
.11
2 2. 0 233 3
6 .1 34 84 1
12 28 5.5
195 4 .57 2
3742 .76 1
112 70 .72
259 5 .33 9
671
. 52 52 1
18
5. 1 12
62
13 3
600 5.
.5 3
.1 34 84 1
505
1237
17 75 1. 21
(b) (7)(E)
3 .59 1471
61 15 2 69
47 .
133
52 18.
16 7
15 9
00
.8
52 .
11 27 0. 71
9. 7 9
. 85 22 1
58
7
85 74 .54
731 8 .7
6715.11 1
93 85 . 62
8 .2 98 2 10
6005.504
5354.961
782
123 2 . 37 4
938
5. 6 23
Legend
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
V a ria b le
D e si g n F l o w
4434.29 1
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 8 .7 1 1 0 .6 2 % 1 .4 3 13632 M X 1 5 8 .2 3 -1 4 . 8 2 %
489
.380
2 .2 29 19
102
202
2 81.
535 4.96 2
98. 29
.26 92 92 1
731
17
22 1. 75
8. 7 71
0 25 21
15 90 0 .8
202
2 81.
. 47 67 1
443 4.29 2
E X IS C O N D 158.17 0 .8 3 13623
Im p a c t US 0 .4 8 " 5 .6 2 % 0 .6 0 9
C o n c lu s io n : A ll c r it e r ia m e t o n M e x ic o s id e . O n U S s id e , e x c e e d s d e f le c t io n c r it e r ia b y 5 . 6 2 % a n d w a t e r s u r f a c e e l e v a t i o n c r i t e r i a b y 0 . 4 8 " . F lo o d p la in e x p a n d s b y o n ly 9 ' a n d v e lo c it y in c r e a s e s b y 0 .6 0 f p s . T h e im p a c t i s l i m i t e d t o a g r i c u l t u r a l l a n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , a ll o f w h ic h a r e lo c a t e d in t h e e x is t in g f lo o d p la in . N o n e w s t r u c t u r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
U.S.A.
938 5
.62
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 9385.mxd
(b) (7)(E)
15 90 0 .8 8
21 1. 28 20
26 16 2. 4. 29 9 43 1 18
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
5. 6 23
857 4.
8. 7 71
54 8
50 212
.2 81 202
.2 92 92 1 5
22 1. 75 17
671
443 4. 29 2
731
12 28 5.5 9
102 98
.2 9
938
7. 74 16
5. 1 12
195 4 .57 2
61
112 70 .72
782 9.7 9
13 3
.1 34 84 1
600 5.
505 535 4. 96 2
259 5 .33 9
374 2 .7
.5 3
18
1237
(b) (7)(E)
17 75 1. 21
47
.6
3 1471
1 52 .6 15 2
.59
133 52 18.
16 7
15 9
00
.8
4434.291
85 74 .54
8 .2 98 2 10
6715.11 1
6005.504
5354.961
11 27 0. 71
93 85
731 8 .7
. 85 22 1
782
58
.62
9. 7 97
1232 .3
Legend
74
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
V a ria b le
D e si g n F l o w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 8 .5 5 6 .0 2 % 1 .3 3 13631 M X 1 5 8 .2 2 -8 .7 4 %
489 .38
09
71 1954.5
2595.338
374 2.7 6
E X IS C O N D 1 5 8 .2 5 0 .8 9 13620
Im p a c t US 1 .0 2 % 0 .4 4 11
C o n c l u s io n : A l l c r i t e r i a m e t o n M e x ic o s i d e . O n U S s i d e , w a t e r s u r f a c e D e si g n F l o w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e le v a t i o n c r i t e r i a m e t . E x c e e d s d e f l e c t i o n c r it e r i a b y 1 . 0 2 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d i ti o n w / n o fl o w th r o u g h fe n c e . F l o o d p la i n e x p l a n d s b y o n ly 1 1 ' . T h e i m p a c t i s l im i t e d t o D e si g n F l o w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n a g r ic u l t u r a l l a n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l a ll o f w h i c h a r e lo c a t e d i n e x i s t in g f l o o d p l a in . N o n e w h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n t h e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . s t r u c t u r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
U.S.A.
85 74 .54 8
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 8574.mxd
(b) (7)(E)
1 25 21
21 1. 28 20
6 6 .2 .1 92 34 92 4 1 18
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
857 4.
8. 7 71
50 212
.2 81 202
2 .2 29 19 5
22 1. 75 17
15 90 0 .8
938
671
443 4.2
731
. 47 67 1
5. 1 12
92
12 28 5.5 9
102 98
.2 9
195 4 .57 2
61
112 70 .72
782 9.7 9
13 3
4 .1 43 18
600 5.
505 535 4. 96 2
259 5 .33 9
374 2 .7
.5 3
18
1237
(b) (7)(E)
17 75 1. 21
47
.6
3 1471
1 52 .6 15 2
.59
133 52 18.
16 7
15 9
00
.8
4434.291
5. 28 12
782
58
11 27 0. 71
2
9. 7 97
85 74 .54
8 .2 98 2 10
6715.11 1
5354.961
6005.504
1232 .3
74
Legend
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
731 8 .7
.62
93 85
V a ria b le
D e sig n F lo w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 8 .4 3 8 .4 3 % M X 1 5 8 .2 6 -1 0 . 5 3 % 1 .2 6 14424
489 .38
09
2595.338
1 954.57
374 2.7 6
E X IS C O N D 1 5 8 .2 7 0 .6 6 14423
Im p a c t US 3 .4 3 % 0 .6 0 1
D e si g n F lo w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e l e v a t io n c r i t e r i a m e t . E x c e e d s d e f l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a b y 3 . 4 3 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d iti o n w / n o fl o w th r o u g h fe n c e . F l o o d p l a in e x p la n d s b y o n l y 1 ' . T h e i m p a c t i s l i m i t e d t o D e si g n F lo w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n a g r ic u lt u r a l la n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l a l l o f w h ic h a r e l o c a t e d i n e x i s t i n g f l o o d p l a in . N o n e w h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n t h e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . s t r u c t u r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
C o n c lu s io n : A l l c r i t e r ia m e t o n M e x i c o s id e . O n U S s i d e , w a t e r s u r f a c e
U.S.A.
78 29 .79 8
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 7829.mxd
(b) (7)(E)
1 25 21
21 1. 28 20
26 16 2. 4. 29 43 19 18
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
857 4.
8. 7 71
50 212
.2 81 202
2 .2 29 19 5
2 .2 51 77 1
15 90 0 .8
938
671
443 4.2
731
. 47 67 1
5. 1 12
92
12 28 5.5 9
102 98
.2 9
195 4 .57 2
61
112 70 .72
782 9.7 9
13 3
4 .1 43 18
600 5.
505 535 4. 96 2
259 5 .33 9
374 2 .7
.5 3
18
1237
(b) (7)(E)
17 75 1. 21
47
.6
3 .59 1471
1 15 2
16 7
133
52 18.
15 9
00
.8
52
.6
4434.291
. 85 22 1
782
58
11 27 0. 71
2
9. 7 97
1232 .3
Legend
74
85 74 .54
8 .2 98 2 10
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
6715.11 1
6005.504
5354.961
731 8 .7
.62
93 85
V a ria b le
D e sig n F lo w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 8 .3 9 7 .8 2 % 1 .1 0 13978 M X 1 5 8 .3 -9 . 1 5 %
489 .38
09
71 1954.5
2595.338
374 2.7 6
E X IS C O N D 1 5 8 .3 2 0 .6 4 13976
Im p a c t US 2 .8 2 % 0 .4 6 2
C o n c lu s io n : A l l c r i t e r ia m e t o n M e x i c o s id e . O n U S s i d e , w a t e r s u r f a c e D e si g n F lo w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e l e v a t io n c r i t e r i a m e t . E x c e e d s d e f l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a b y 2 . 8 2 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d iti o n w / n o fl o w th r o u g h fe n c e . F l o o d p l a in e x p la n d s b y o n l y 2 ' . T h e i m p a c t i s l i m i t e d t o D e si g n F lo w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n a g r ic u lt u r a l la n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l a l l o f w h ic h a r e l o c a t e d i n e x i s t i n g f l o o d p l a in . N o n e w h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n t h e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . s t r u c t u r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
U.S.A.
731 8.7 7
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 7318.mxd
(b) (7)(E)
15 90 0 .8 8
1 .2 81 02 2
6 .2 16 92 4. 92 43 1 18
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
5. 6 23
857 4.
8. 7 71
54 8
50 212
.2 81 202
2 .2 29 19 5
17
671
443 4. 29 2
938
22 1. 75
. 47 67 1
12 28 5.5 9
102 98
.2 9
731
5. 1 12
195 4 .57 2
61
112 70 .72
782 9.7 9
13 3
4 .1 43 18
600 5.
505 535 4. 96 2
259 5 .33 9
374 2 .7
.5 3
18
1237
17 75 1. 21
(b) (7)(E)
3 .5 147 1
1 52 .6 15 2 9
9
52 18.
16 7
47
.6
133
15 9
00
.8
4434.291
85 74 .54
28 8. 29 10
6715.11 1
5354.961
6005.504
11 27 0. 71
93 85
731 8 .7
5. 28 12
782
58
.62
9. 7 97
1232 .3
74
Legend
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
V a ria b le
D e sig n F lo w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 8 .3 5 6 .6 2 % 1 .0 3 15053 M X 1 5 8 .2 6 -7 . 8 3 %
489 .38
09
71 1954.5
2595.338
374 2.7 6
E X IS C O N D 1 5 8 .2 8 0 .6 7 15051
Im p a c t US 1 .6 2 % 0 .3 6 2
D e si g n F l o w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e l e v a t io n c r i t e r ia m e t . E x c e e d s d e f le c t io n c r i t e r ia b y 1 . 6 2 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d i ti o n w / n o fl o w th r o u g h fe n c e . F l o o d p l a in e x p la n d s b y o n l y 2 ' . T h e i m p a c t is l im i t e d t o D e si g n F l o w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n a g r i c u l t u r a l la n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l a l l o f w h ic h a r e lo c a t e d i n e x is t i n g f lo o d p l a i n . N o n e w h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n t h e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . s t r u c t u r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
C o n c lu s io n : A l l c r i t e r i a m e t o n M e x ic o s i d e . O n U S s id e , w a t e r s u r f a c e
U.S.A.
671 5.1 12
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 6715.mxd
FME006218
(b) (7)(E)
21 1. 28 20
26 16 2. 4. 29 9 43 1 18
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
857 4.
8. 7 71
2 1. 75 17
15 90 0 .8
938
102 98
2 19
.2 9
92
.2 5
12 28 5.5 9
443 4.2
731
2 81. 202
671
92
7 7. 74 16
5. 1 12
195 4 . 57 2
112 70 .72
600 5.
259 5 . 33 9
.1 5 34 84 1 21 1. 75 17
61
782 9.7 9
505 535 4. 96 2
13 3
374 2 .7
1237
7 .6 74 16
90 15
52 152
0.8
.6 1
(b) (7)(E)
.59
1 133 8. 5 2
3 1471
782
4434.291
12
5 28
.5
9. 7 97
1232 .3
74
489 .38
.5 3
18
09
71 1954.5
2595.338
Legend
374 2.7
857 4.5 4
8 .2 98 2 10
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
6715.111
5354.961
6005.504
11 27 0. 71
731 8 .7
.62
93 85
V a ria b le
D e si g n F l o w
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 8 .2 9 6 .5 1 % 0 .9 5 15336 M X 1 5 8 .1 1 -6 . 6 4 %
E X IS C O N D 1 5 8 .1 3 0 .7 8 15334
Im p a c t US 1 .5 1 % 0 .1 7 2
C o n c lu s io n : A l l c r i t e r ia m e t o n M e x i c o s i d e . O n U S s i d e , w a t e r s u r f a c e D e si g n F l o w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e l e v a t i o n c r i t e r i a m e t . E x c e e d s d e f l e c t i o n c r it e r i a b y 1 . 5 1 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d i ti o n w / n o flo w th r o u g h fe n c e . F l o o d p l a i n e x p l a n d s b y o n l y 2 ' . T h e im p a c t i s l i m i t e d t o D e si g n F l o w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n a g r ic u lt u r a l la n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l a l l o f w h i c h a r e l o c a t e d in e x is t i n g f l o o d p la i n . N o n e w h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n th e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . s t r u c tu r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e fo r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
U.S.A.
600
5.5 0
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 6005.mxd
1 25 21
21 1. 28 20
26 16 2. 4. 29 43 19 18
14 71 3.6
15 25 2.6 2
15 9
00 .8
(b) (7)(E)
857 4.
8. 7 71
7 17
671
443 4.2
731
938
21
2 81. 202
2 .2 51
.7 47 67 1
5. 1 12
92
12 28 5.5 9
195 4 .57 2
2 19
102 98
.2 92
.2 9
61
600 5.
259 5 .33 9
75 17
112 70 .72
21 1.
782 9.7 9
13 3
43 18
18
4.1
505 535 4. 96 2
374 2.7
.5 3
1237
7 .6 74 16
90 15
0. 8
(b) (7)(E)
3 1471
52 .6 1
.5 9
5 18 . 133 2
15 2
782
4434.291
6715.111
5354.961
6005.504
11 27 0. 71
28 12
5.
58
8 .2 98 2 10
.62
9. 7 97
1232 .3
74
489 .38
09
954.571
595.338
Legend
374 2.7
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
85 74 .54
93 85
731 8 .7
V a ria b le
D e si g n F l o w
E X IS C O N D 1 5 8 .1 1 0 .8 6 15578
w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e P RO P CO ND M X US 1 5 8 .2 4 6 .0 7 % 0 .9 8 15583 M X 1 5 8 .0 9 -5 . 7 5 %
Im p a c t US 1 .0 7 % 0 .1 2 5
C o n c lu s io n : A l l c r i t e r ia m e t o n M e x i c o s id e . O n U S s i d e , w a t e r s u r f a c e D e si g n F lo w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e l e v a t io n c r i t e r i a m e t . E x c e e d s d e f l e c t i o n c r i t e r i a b y 1 . 0 7 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d iti o n w / n o fl o w th r o u g h fe n c e . F l o o d p l a in e x p la n d s b y o n l y 5 ' . T h e i m p a c t i s l i m i t e d t o D e si g n F lo w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n a g r ic u lt u r a l la n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l a l l o f w h ic h a r e l o c a t e d i n e x i s t i n g f l o o d p l a in . N o n e w h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n t h e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . s t r u c t u r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
U.S.A.
535 4.9 62
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 5354.mxd
(b) (7)(E)
16 4.
857 4.
8. 7 71
548
.62 938 5
43 18
15 25 2.6 2
202
1. 75 17
102 98
2 19
.2 9
92
12 28 5.5
.2 5
443 4.29 2
731
2 81. 202
6 2.2 29 19
671
22
14 71 3.6
.7 47 67 1
5. 1 1
195 4 . 57 2
112 70 .72
600 5.
259 5 . 33 9
.1 5 34 84 1 21 1. 75 17
13 3
782 9.7 9
505 535 4. 96 2
18
374 2 .76 1
1237
7 .6 74 16
90 15
52 152
0.8
.6 1
(b) (7)(E)
.59
1 133 8. 5 2
3 1471
11 27 0. 71
9. 7 9
28 12
5.
58
7
731 8 .7
6715.111
93 85 . 62
857 4.5 4
8 .2 98 2 10
6005.504
5354.961
782
123 2 .37
489 .380 9
.5 3
Legend
HEC-RAS Cross Sections Proposed Fence Alignment Proposed Condition Floodplain Existing Condition Floodplain
V a ria b le
D e si g n F l o w w i th I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e E X IS C O N D 1 5 8.0 4 0 .90 15430 PROP COND M X US 1 5 8.2 5 .81 % 0 .96 15431 M X 1 5 8.0 2 -4 . 9 7 %
Im p a c t US 0.8 1 % 0.0 6 1
C o n c lu s io n : A ll c r it e r ia m e t o n M e x ic o s id e . O n U S s id e , w a t e r s u r f a c e D e si g n F l o w w / I m p e r m e a b l e F e n c e r e p r e se n ts e le v a t i o n c r it e r i a m e t . E x c e e d s d e f l e c t io n c r i t e r ia b y 0 . 8 1 % . c o n se r v a ti v e c o n d i ti o n w / n o fl o w th r o u g h fe n c e . F lo o d p la i n e x p l a n d s b y o n l y 1 ' . T h e i m p a c t i s l im i t e d t o D e si g n F l o w w / F e n c e r e p r e se n te d a s p o st i n a g r ic u lt u r a l l a n d , n a t u r a l a r e a o p e n s p a c e , a n d a f e w s t r u c t u r e s , f l o o d p l a i n a l l o w i n g f r e e f l o w t h r o u g h f e n c e . T h e a c t u a l a ll o f w h i c h a r e l o c a t e d in e x i s t i n g f l o o d p l a i n . N o n e w h y d r a u l i c i m p a c t w i l l l i e b e t w e e n t h e s e t w o s i t u a t i o n s . s t r u c t u r e s a d d e d ; t h e r e f o r e , n o im p a c t t o U S .
U.S.A.
443 4.29 2
1 inch = 400 ft
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\July 2010\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments RS 4434.mxd
FME006221
(b) (7)(E)
V:\PROJECTS\DHS\112319_PF225 Phase 2\Drainage Reports and dwg\PF225 Phase 2 & COE drainage reports\O-1, O-2, O-3 floodplain analysis\IBWC Lidar Data\Report\O2 Baker_IBWC Fence Alignments Map 1.mxd