Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eighth Edition
Acute Myocardial Infarction Acute Treatment of Stroke Unstable Angina/Non-Q-Wave Infarction Stable Angina Pectoris and Silent IschemiaMedical Therapy Interventional Cardiology Hypertension Congestive Heart Failure Lipid-Lowering Studies Arrhythmia Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis, Prevention of Progression Valvular Heart Disease Preliminary Reports EDITORS: ROBERT A. KLONER, MD, PhD YOCHAI BIRNBAUM, MD
& Jason S. Chi, BS
Cardiovascular Trials Review, 8th Edition Copyright 2003 by Le Jacq Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. 1st Edition Copyright 1996, 2nd Edition Copyright 1997, 3rd Edition Copyright 1998, 4th Edition Copyright 1999, Millenium (5th) Edition Copyright 2000, 6th Edition Copyright 2001, 7th Edition Copyright 2002 by Le Jacq Communications, Inc. Reproduction or translation of any part of this work without permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Requests for permission or further information should be addressed to the Permissions Department, Le Jacq Communications, Inc., 3 Parklands Drive, Darien, CT 06820. The facts, opinions, and ideas expressed in this book are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher. The opinions and information presented in this book are attributed to the authors and not to the publisher. No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any damage and/or injury of any nature occurring from any use, misuse, or omission of any of the information contained in this book.
ISBN 1-929660-13-8
Printed in the United States of America.
ii
Contents
Contents
Table of Contents
Subjects Trials Listing Introduction Trials Trials Index (in alphabetical order)
-v-vii-xxxiii1 1205
Contents
iii
Contents
Subjects
Section Page
1.
Acute Myocardial Infarction a. Thrombolytic Therapy b. Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty vs Stenting vs Thrombolytic Therapy c. Anticoagulation/Antiplatelet d. Early vs Late Intervention After Acute Myocardial Infarction e. Remodeling After Infarction f. Miscellaneous and Adjunctive Therapy Acute Treatment of Stroke
2. 3.
Unstable Angina/Non-Q-Wave Infarction/Non-ST-Elevation 207 Myocardial Infarction or Acute Coronary Syndrome Stable Angina Pectoris and Silent IschemiaMedical Therapy 307 Interventional Cardiology a. Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (and/or stenting) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery b. Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty vs Stenting vs Other Percutaneous Devices, IVUS Guided Stenting c. Medical Therapy, Brachytherapy, Drug-Eluting Stents to Prevent Restenosis and/or Complications After Intracoronary Interventions or Occlusion After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting d. Other Therapy Including Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization Hypertension Congestive Heart Failure Lipid-Lowering Studies Arrhythmia
4. 5.
6. 7. 8. 9.
Contents
Section
Page
Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation Deep Vein Thrombosis/ Pulmonary Embolism Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis, Prevention of Progression Valvular Heart Disease Preliminary Reports a. Acute Myocardial Infarction b. Unstable Angina, Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction c. Hypertension d. Congestive Heart Failure e. Arrhythmia f. Interventional Cardiology
13. 14.
1145
vi
Contents
Contents
Trials Listing
Page Acronym/Title
1a.
2 4
8 11 13 15 18 20 22 25
27
1b.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty vs Stenting vs Thrombolytic Therapy
Stent-PAMI Stent-Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Long-Term Benefit of Primary Angioplasty as Compared with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction
32 34
Contents
vii
Page 36 38 40
Acronym/Title PACT Plasminogen Activator Angioplasty Compatibility Trial CCP Cooperative Cardiovascular Project PRAGUE Primary Angioplasty in Patients Transferred from General Community Hospitals to Specialized PTCA Units with or Without Emergency Thrombolysis STOPAMI Stent vs Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction STAT Stenting vs Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Trial SHOCK Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock? Stenting vs Balloon Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction Randomized Comparison of Direct Stenting with Conventional Stent Implantation in Selected Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction STENTIM-2 Stenting in Acute Myocardial Infarction-2 C-PORT The Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team TIMI Frame Count Air PAMI Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Randomized Comparison of Primary Angioplasty and Thrombolytic Therapy CAPTIM Comparison of Angioplasty and Prehospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction PRAGUE-2 Primary Angioplasty in Patients Transported from General Community Hospitals to Specialized PTCA Units with or Without Emergency Thrombolysis-2
43 45 47 50 52 54 57 59 61 63 65 68
1c.
72 74 76 78 81 83
viii
Contents
Acronym/Title HIT-4 Hirudin for the Improvement of Thrombolysis-4 TIM Triflusal in Myocardial Infarction Eptifibatide vs Placebo in Patients Receiving Thrombolytic Therapy JAMIS Japanese Antiplatelet Myocardial Infarction Study STAMI Study of Ticlopidine vs Aspirin in Myocardial Infarction ADMIRAL Abciximab Before Direct Angioplasty and Stenting in Myocardial Infarction Regarding Acute and Long-Term Follow-Up INTRO AMI Integrilin and Low-Dose Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction Study CHAMP Combination Hemotherapy and Mortality Prevention HART II Second Trial of Heparin and Aspirin Reperfusion Therapy ENTIRE-TIMI-23 Enoxaparin and TNK-tPA With or Without GP IIIb/IIIa Inhibitor as Reperfusion Strategy in ST Evaluation MI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-23 HERO-2 Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion-2 Trial PENTALYSE Pentasaccharide, as an Adjunct to Fibrinolysis in ST Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction CADILLAC Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications PRIME Promotion of Reperfusion in Myocardial Infarction Evolution VITAL Vasoflux International Trial for Acute Myocardial Infarction Lysis Enoxaparin vs Unfractionated Heparin After Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction ASPECT-2 Antithrombotics in the Secondary Prevention of Events in Coronary Thrombosis-2 AMI-SK Acute Myocardial Infarction Streptokinase ASSENT Plus Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Plus TIGER-PA Tirofiban Given in the Emergency Room Before Primary Angioplasty Pilot Trial Intracoronary vs Intravenous Abciximab in Acute Coronary Syndromes APRICOT-2 Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion in Coronary Thrombolysis Trial-2 Warfarin, Aspirin, or Both After Myocardial Infarction
106 108 111 115 118 120 122 124 127 129 131 133 136
Contents
ix
Page
Acronym/Title
1d.
Acute Myocardial Infarction Early vs Late Intervention After Acute Myocardial Infarction
Early Revascularization in 14-Day Survivors of Acute Myocardial Infarction
140
1e.
1f.
Contents
Acronym/Title ESCAMI Evaluation of the Safety and Cardioprotective Effects of Eniporide in Acute Myocardial Infarction Does Angina Pectoris the Week Before Protect Against First Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus? HALT-MI Hu23F2G Anti-Adhesion to Limit Cytotoxic Injury Following AMI MAGIC Magnesium in Coronaries FLORIDA Fluvastatin on Risk Diminishment After Acute Myocardial Infarction SADHART Sertraline Antidepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial
2.
194 196 198 200 203 205
3.
215
Contents
xi
Page 217
Acronym/Title VANQWISH Trial (Non-Q-Wave Myocardial Infarction Following Thrombolysis) Veterans Affairs Non-Q-Wave Infarction Strategies In-Hospital PARAGON B Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonist for the Reduction of Acute Coronary Syndrome Events in a Global Organization Network B PARAGON B (Troponin T Substudy) Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonism for the Reduction of Acute Coronary Syndrome Events in a Global Organization Network PURSUIT Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy PURSUIT (Substudy) Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy PURSUIT (Substudy) Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy PURSUIT (Substudy) Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy PURSUIT (Subanalysis) Platelet IIb/IIIa in Unstable Angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy FRISC II Fragmin and Fast Revascularisation During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease II FRISC II (Substudy) Fragmin and Fast Revascularization During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease II FRAX.I.S Fraxiparine in Ischemic Syndrome TIMI-11B Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-11B Randomized Trial Comparing IV Nitroglycerin and Heparin for Treatment of Unstable Angina Secondary to Restenosis After Coronary Artery Angioplasty Efegatran in Unstable Angina SYMPHONY Sibrafiban vs Aspirin to Yield Maximum Protection from Ischemic Heart Events Post-Acute Coronary Syndromes 2nd SYMPHONY Sibrafiban vs Aspirin to Yield Maximum Protection from Ischemic Heart Events Post-Acute Coronary Syndromes OPUS-TIMI-16 Oral Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibition with Orbofiban in Patients with Unstable Coronary Syndromes ESSENCE (ST Segment Monitoring Substudy) Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events ESSENCE (1-Year Results) Efficacy and Safety of Subcutaneous Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events
Contents
219 221
223 225 227 229 231 233 238 240 243 245
xii
Contents
Acronym/Title APLAUD Antiplatelet Useful Dose GUARDIAN Guard During Ischemia Against Necrosis FROST Fibrinogen Receptor Occupancy Study GUSTO IV-ACS Global Utilization of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries IVAcute Coronary Syndromes GUSTO IV Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries IVAcute Coronary Syndrome (1-Year Follow-Up) TACTICS-TIMI-18 Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative StrategyThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-18 TACTICS-TIMI 18 (Substudy) Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative StrategyThrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction-18 CURE Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events CURE Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina To Prevent Recurrent Events (Substudy) CURE Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events Trial (Substudy) PCI-CURE Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent EventsPercutaneous Coronary Intervention Substudy VINO Value of First Day Coronary Angiography/Angioplasty in Evolving Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. An Open Multicenter Randomized Trial ACE Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome INTERACT Integrilin and Enoxaparin Randomized Assessment of Acute Coronary Syndrome Treatment Women Do Have an Improved Long-Term Outcome After Non-STElevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Treated Very Early and Predominantly with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ACUTE 2 Antithombolic Combination Using Tirofiban and Enoxaparin RITA 3 Randomized Intervention Trial of Unstable Angina NUT-2 The Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Unstable Angina Treatment-2 Pilot Study AZACS Azithromycin in Acute Coronary Syndrome
275
Contents
xiii
Page
Acronym/Title
4.
308 310 312 314 316 318 320 322 324 326 328 330 333 336
5a.
Interventional Cardiology Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty (and/or stenting) vs Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Cognitive Outcome After Off-Pump and On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A Randomized Trial Octopus Study Octopus Study BHACAS (1 & 2) Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies 1&2
Contents
xiv
Contents
Acronym/Title EAST (8-Year Mortality Data) Emory Angioplasty vs Surgery Trial BARI (7-Year Outcome, Diabetics) Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study ERACI II Argentine Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty vs Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Multivessel Disease II ARTS Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study AWESOME Angina with Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation Comparison of Stenting with Minimally Invasive Bypass Surgery for Stenosis of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery SOS Stent or Surgery
5b.
Interventional Cardiology Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty vs Stenting vs Other Percutaneous Devices, IVUS Guided Stenting
BENESTENT-I (5-Year Follow-Up) Belgium Netherlands Stent STRESS (Diabetic Substudy) Stent Restenosis Study TOSCA Total Occlusion Study of Canada START (Stent vs Atherectomy) Stent vs Directional Coronary Atherectomy Randomized Trial START (Stenting vs PTCA) Stent Implantation and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Lesions ABACAS Adjunctive Balloon Angioplasty After Coronary Atherectomy Study FROST French Randomized Optimal Stenting Trial Comparison of GR-II Stent and Palmaz-Schatz Stent CRUISE Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion? COBRA Comparison of Balloon Angioplasty vs Rotational Atherectomy PARAGON Stent Study Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonism for the Reduction of Acute Coronary Syndrome Events in a Global Organization Network Stent Implantation in Small Coronary Arteries
368 370 372 374 376 378 380 382 384 386 388
390
Contents
xv
Page 392 394 396 399 401 403 405 407 409 411 413 415 417 419 421 423 425 427 429 431 433 435 437 439 441
Acronym/Title High-Pressure Stenting vs Balloon Angioplasty NIRVANA NIR Vascular Advanced North American Trial STRATAS Study to Determine Rotablator and Transluminal Angioplasty Strategy BET Benefit Evaluation of Direct Coronary Stenting BET Benefit Evaluation of Direct Coronary Stenting ASCENT ACS MultiLink Stent Clinical Equivalence in De Novo Lesions Trial DESTINI Doppler End Point Stenting International Investigation DEBATE II Doppler End Points Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe II DEBATE II (Substudy) Doppler End Points Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe II ISAR-SMART Intracoronary Stenting or Angioplasty for Restenosis Reduction in Small Arteries ISAR-SMART Trial (Substudy) Intracoronary Stenting or Angioplasty for Restenosis Reduction in Small Arteries WIDEST Wiktor Stent in De Novo Stenosis OPUS-1 Optimum Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty vs Routine Stenting-1 ADVANCE Additional Value of NIR Stents for Treatment of Long Coronary Lesions ARTIST Angioplasty vs Rotational Atherectomy for Treatment of Diffuse In-Stent Restenosis Trial ARTIST (Substudy) Angioplasty Versus Rotational Atherectomy for the Treatment of Diffuse In-Stent Restenosis Trial SISA Stent in Small Arteries OPTICUS Optimization with ICUS (Intracoronary Ultrasound) to Reduce Stent Restenosis Cutting Balloon Angioplasty SCORES Stent Comparative Restenosis BESMART Bestent in Small Arteries SAFE Saphenous Vein Graft Angioplasty Free of Emboli Magic 5L Magic 5L Wallstent Study CAPAS Cutting Balloon Angioplasty vs Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty Randomized Study in Type B/C Lesions SISCA Stenting in Small Coronary Arteries
Contents
xvi
Contents
Page 443 446 449 452 455 458 460 462 464
Acronym/Title PREDICT Predilatation vs Direct Stenting in Coronary Treatment DIRECT Comparison of Direct Stenting vs Stenting with Predilation for the Treatment of Selected Coronary Narrowings SWIBAP Stent Without Balloon Predilation Cutting Balloon Global Randomized Trial Direct Coronary Stenting Versus Predilatation Followed by Stent Placement ISAR-STEREO-2 Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Strut Thickness Effect on Restenosis Outcome Trial DANSTENT The Danish Multicenter Stent Study TENISS The Tenax vs NIR Stent Study MultiLink Long Stents for Long Coronary Lesions
5c.
Interventional Cardiology Medical Therapy, Brachytherapy, Drug-Eluting Stents to Prevent Restenosis and/or Complications After Intracoronary Interventions or Occlusion After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
IMPACT-II (Substudy) Integrilin to Minimize Platelet Aggregation and Coronary Thrombosis-II EPISTENT Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Stenting EPISTENT (6-Month Outcome) Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Stenting EPISTENT (Diabetic Substudy) Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Stenting ERASER The Evaluation of ReoPro and Stenting to Eliminate Restenosis 3-Year Clinical and Angiographic Follow-Up After Intracoronary Radiation VIP Visipaque in Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty EXCITE Evaluation of Oral Xemilofiban in Controlling Thrombotic Events Clopidogrel as Adjunctive Antiplatelet Therapy During Coronary Stenting Clopidogrel vs Ticlopidine After Intracoronary Stent Placement Minimal Heparinization in Coronary Angioplasty
468 470 472 474 476 478 480 482 484 486 488
Contents
xvii
Page 490 492 495 498 500 502 504 506 508 510 512 515 517 519 521 523 525 527 529 531 533 535 537 539 541
Acronym/Title TREAT Tranilast Restenosis Following Angioplasty Trial TREAT-2 Tranilast Restenosis Angioplasty Trial-2 CAPARES Coronary Angioplasty Amlodipine Restenosis Study WRIST Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial COURT Contrast Media Utilization in High-Risk PTCA Gamma-1 Trial Gamma-1 Study (Intravascular Ultrasound Analysis) -Radiation TherapyDose-Finding Study CLASSICS Clopidogrel Aspirin Stent International Cooperative Study PREVENT (Radiotherapy) Proliferation Reduction with Vascular Energy Trial ESPRIT Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy ESPRIT (Substudy) Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy ESPRIT (Substudy) Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy IMPRESS Intramural Infusion of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin to Prevent Restenosis After Stent Implantation PRICE Prairie ReoPro vs Integrilin Cost Evaluation NICOLE Nisoldipine in Coronary Artery Disease in Leuven PARIS Effect of ACE Inhibitors on Angiographic Restenosis from PARIS Investigators POLONIA Study Polish-American Local Lovenox NIR Assessment Study ISAR Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen ISAR-3 Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-3 Brachytherapy for Femoropopliteal Angioplasty TARGET Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Trial TARGET (Subanalysis) Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes? TARGET Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcome Trial Sirolimus-Eluting Stents
xviii
Contents
Contents
Acronym/Title Intravascular Gamma Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis in Saphenous Vein Bypass Grafts ITALICS Randomized Investigation by the Thoraxcenter of Antisense DNA Using Local Delivery and IVUS After Coronary Stenting Trial RAVEL Randomized Study with the Sirolimus-Coated Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions RAVEL Randomized Study with the Sirolimus-Eluting Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions RAVEL (Angiographic Findings) Randomized Study with the Sirolimus-Eluting Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent RAVEL Randomized, Double-Blind Study with the Sirolimus-Eluting Bx Velocity Balloon Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients with de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions. (Substudy) TRAPIST Trapidil for Prevention of In-Stent Stenosis ATLAST Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Enoxaparin After High-Risk Coronary Stenting Homocysteine and Restenosis VeGAS 2 Vein Graft AngioJet Study 2 CART-1 Canadian Antioxidant Restenosis Trial COAST Heparin-Coated Stents in Small Coronary Arteries Trial CREDO Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation IMPRESS Immunosuppressive Therapy for the Prevention of Restenosis After Coronary Artery Stent Implantation TOPSTAR Troponin in Planned PTCA/Stent Implantation with or Without Administration of the Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonist Tirofiban The Swiss Heart Study ASPECT Asian Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Clinical Trial ASPECT (Substudy) Asian Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Clinical Trial BAAS Balloon Angioplasty and Anticoagulation Study ESPRIT Esapent for Prevention of Restenosis Italian Study PRESTO Prevention of Restenosis with Tranilast and Its Outcomes
549
552 554
Contents
xix
Page
Acronym/Title
5d.
6.
616 618 620 623 625 627 629 631 634 639
Hypertension
SHEP (Subanalysis) Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program STOP-Hypertension-2 (Update) Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 Syst-Eur Systolic Hypertension-Europe Syst-Eur (Substudy) Systolic Hypertension-Europe TONE Trial of Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Elderly ARIC Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities DRASTIC Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative Study ALLHAT Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial Comparison of ACE Inhibitors, Calcium Antagonists, -Blockers, and Diuretic Agents on Reactive Hyperemia in Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Multicenter Study
Contents
xx
Contents
Page 641 643 645 647 649 651 653 655 657 659 662 666 668 670 672 674 677 679 682 684 686 689
Acronym/Title CANDLE Candesartan vs Losartan Efficacy Comparison Study Long-Term Effects of Weight Loss and Dietary Sodium Reduction on Incidence of Hypertension NORDIL Nordic Diltiazem Study INSIGHT International Nifedipine GITS Study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertensive Treatment DASH Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension(Reduced Dietary Sodium Study) Drug Classes in Black Hypertensives CASTLE Candesartan and Amlodipine for Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy ABC Trial Association of Black Cardiologists TOHP-II Trials of Hypertension Prevention-II AASK African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension AASK The African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension IRMA II Irbesartan in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Microalbuminuria Study II RENAAL Reduction of End Points in NIDDM (Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus) with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan IDNT Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial IDNT Irbesartan Diabetic Nephropathy Trial PROGRESS Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study PROGRESS (Substudy) Perindopril Protection Against Recurrent Stroke Study LIFE Losartan Intervention for End Point Reduction LIFE (Diabetes Mellitus Substudy) Losartan Intervention for End Point Reduction LIFE Losartan Intervention for End Point Reduction (Substudy) A Comparison of Outcomes with Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitors and Diuretics for Hypertension in the Elderly COOPERATE Combination Treatment of Angiotensin-II Receptor Blocker And Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitor in Non-Diabetic Renal Disease SUCCESS-VII Successive Celecoxib Clinical Efficacy and Safety Studies
691
Contents
xxi
Page 694
7.
698 701 703 705 707 709 711 713 715 717 721 723 725 727 729 731 733 735 737 739
xxii
Contents
Page 741 744 746 748 750 752 754 756 758 760 762 764 766 768 770
Acronym/Title COPERNICUS Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival Study BEST The -Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial BREATHE-1 Bosentan Randomized Trial of Endothelin Antagonist Therapy-1 VMAC Vasodilation in the Management of Acute Congestive Heart Failure OPTIME-CHF Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Intravenous Milrinone for Exacerbations of Chronic Heart Failure Dobutamine vs Nesiritide on Arrhythmias Immunosuppressive Treatment of Inflammatory Dilated Cardiomyopathy ALPHABET Arterial Pulmonary Hypertension and Beraprost European Trial MIRACLE Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation Val-HeFT Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Val-HeFT Echocardiographic Study Valsartan Benefits Left Ventricular Structure and Function in Heart Failure REMATCH Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure SOLVD Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (Substudy) LIDO Levosimendan Infusion Versus Dobutamine RUSSLAN Randomized Study on Safety and Effectiveness of Levosimendan in Patients with Left Ventricular Failure Due to an Acute Myocardial Infarct The MIRACLE ICD Trial The Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation-Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Trial RITZ-4 Randomized Intravenous Tezosentan Study-4 OVERTURE Omapatrilat Versus Enalapril Randomized Trial of Utility in Reducing Events EPHESUS Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study
8.
784
Lipid-Lowering Studies
HATS HDL-Atherosclerosis Treatment Study
Contents
xxiii
Page 786
Acronym/Title Comparison of the Effects of Atorvastatin Versus Simvastatin on Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Primary Prevention as Determined by Electron Beam Tomography 4S Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study 4S (Substudy) Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study WOSCOPS Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with Hypercholesterolemia: West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study WOSCOPS (Substudy) West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study CARE Cholesterol and Recurrent Events CARE (Substudy) Cholesterol and Recurrent Events CARE (Substudy) Cholesterol and Recurrent Events AFCAPS/TexCAPS AFCAPS/TexCAPS C-Reactive Protein Substudy: Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study LIPID (Substudy) Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease LIPID Substudy (Effect In Women) Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease LIPID (Incidence of Stroke) Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease VA-HIT Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial VA-HIT (Update) Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Intervention Trial VA-HIT (Stroke Substudy) Veterans Affairs HDL Intervention Trial VA-HIT Veterans Affairs High-Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial (Substudy) Cerivastatin in Primary Hypercholesterolemia Extended Release Niacin vs Gemfibrozil for the Treatment of Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol LISA Lescol in Severe Atherosclerosis BIP Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention Post-CABG Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Trial (7.5-Year FollowUp) ASAP Atorvastatin vs Simvastatin on Atherosclerosis Progression
798 800 804 806 808 810 813 815 817 819 821 822 825 827 829 831 833 835
xxiv
Contents
Contents
Page 837 839 841 843 845 847 849 851 853
Acronym/Title MIRACL Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering MIRACL Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (Substudy) RIKS-HIA Register of Information and Knowledge About Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions ASSET Atorvastatin Simvastatin Safety and Efficacy Trial Statin, Restenosis and the PlA2 Polymorphism of the Platelet Glycoprotein IIIa Gene ADMIT Arterial Disease Multiple Intervention Trial L-CAD Lipid-Coronary Artery Disease Study WATCH Womens Atorvastatin Trial on Cholesterol Comparison of Effects on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol with Rosuvastatin vs Atorvastatin in Patients with Type IIa or IIb Hypercholesterolemia Atorvastatin vs Cerivastatin PRINCE Pravastatin Inflammation CRP Evaluation GAIN German Atorvastatin Intravascular Ultrasound Study Vascular Basis for the Treatment of Myocardial Ischemia GREACE Greek Atorvastatin and Coronary Heart Disease Evaluation CHALLENGE Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Atorvastatin and Simvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia With and Without Coronary Heart Disease Niacin-ER/Lovastatin Combination for Hyperlipidemia FAST Fukuoka Atherosclerosis Trial ALLHAT-LLT The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack TrialLipid Lowering Trial ADVENT The Assessment of Diabetes Control and Evaluation of the Efficacy of Niaspan Trial Efficacy and Safety of a Potent New Selective Cholesterol Absorption Inhibitor, Ezetimibe, in Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia Efficacy and Safety of Ezetimibe Added to Ongoing Statin Therapy for Treatment of Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia Long-Term Persistence in Use of Statin Therapy in Elderly Patients STRRIDE Studies of Targeted Risk Reduction Interventions Through Defined Exercise (Substudy)
Contents
xxv
Acronym/Title ASCOT-LLA Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes TrialLipid Lowering Arm ADVOCATE The Advicor Versus Other Cholesterol-ModulatingAgents Trial Evaluation Ezetimibe Ezetimibe-Pravastatin Rosuvastatin vs Pravastatin and Simvastatin Rosuvastatin vs Atorvastatin PROSPER Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk
9.
906 908 910 912 914 916 918 920 923 925 927 929 931
Arrhythmia
MADIT-II Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-II AVID Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillators AVID (-Blocker Substudy) Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillators Prevention of Implantable Defibrillator Shocks by Treatment with Sotalol Facilitating Transthoracic Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation with Ibutilide Pretreatment French Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Study MUSTT Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial Investigation MUSTT Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (Substudy) CTAF Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation CIDS Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study TRACE (Atrial Fibrillation Substudy) Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation ARCH Amiodarone Reduction in Coronary Heart Trial Oral d,1 Sotalol Reduces the Incidence of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Efficacy and Safety of Ibutilide Fumarate for the Conversion of Atrial Arrhythmias After Cardiac Surgery GEMICA Grupo de Estudios Multricentricos en Argentina
933 936
xxvi
Contents
Contents
Page 939 941 943 945 947 949 951 954 957 960 962 964 966 968 970 972 974 976 978 980 982 984 987 990
Contents
Acronym/Title CTOPP Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Effective Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation by Continuous Atrial Overdrive Pacing After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Atrial Pacing for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiovascular Surgery Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Chest Compression Alone or with Mouth-to-Mouth Ventilation ARREST Amiodarone in Out-of-Hospital Resuscitation of Refractory Sustained Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias CASH Cardiac Arrest Study: Hamburg PIAF Pharmacologic Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation AFIST Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trial DIAMOND Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide DIAMOND (Substudy) Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide Metoprolol CR/XL to Maintain Sinus Rhythm After Conversion from Atrial Fibrillation SVA-3 Azimilide Supraventricular Arrhythmia Program-3 Amiodarone for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Post-CABG SAFIRE-D Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation Investigative Research on Dofetilide Study ORCA Optimized Response to Cardiac Arrest CAT Cardiomyopathy Trial tPA in Cardiac Arrest Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest Study Hypothermia in Cardiac Arrest MOST Mode Selection Trial in Sinus-Node Dysfunction ALIVE Amiodarone vs Lidocaine in Prehospital Ventricular Fibrillation Evaluation AFFIRM The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management Delaying Defibrillation to Give Basic Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation to Patients with Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation ERAFT European Rythmol/Rytmonorm Atrial Fibrillation Trial
xxvii
Acronym/Title UKPACE United Kingdom Pacing and Cardiovascular Events Trial BLOS The -Blocker Length of Stay DAVID Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator Trial DEBUT Defibrillator vs -Blocker for Unexplained Death in Thailand VPS II Second Vasovagal Pacemaker Study STAF The Strategies of Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation AIRCRAFT Australian Intervention Randomized Control of Rate in Atrial Fibrillation Trial AMIOVIRT Amiodarone vs Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator
10.
1010 1012 1014 1017
11.
1020 1022 1024
xxviii
Contents
Acronym/Title PENTATHLON 2000 Fondaparinux vs Enoxaparin for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Hip-Replacement Surgery EPHESUS European Pentasaccharide Hip Elective Surgery Study METHRO II Melagatran for Thrombin Inhibition in Orthopaedic Surgery Prolonged Thromboprophylaxis with Oral Anticoagulants After Total Hip Arthroplasty SACRE Study Comparing Oral Anticoagulants with Reviparin PREVENT Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism Heparin Plus Alteplase Compared with Heparin Alone in Patients with Submassive Pulmonary Embolism
12.
1056 1058 1060 1062 1064 1066 1068 1070 1072 1075 1077 1079 1081 1083 1085 1087 1089
Contents
xxix
Page 1091 1093 1095 1098 1100 1102 1104 1106 1108 1110 1112 1114 1116 1118 1121 1124 1127 1129 1132 1134 1136 1138 1140 1142
Acronym/Title PREVENT (Post Hoc Analysis) Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Vascular Effects of Norvasc Trial PART-2 Prevention of Atherosclerosis with Ramipril Trial-2 PPP Primary Prevention Project SECURE Study to Evaluate Carotid Ultrasound Changes in Patients Treated with Ramipril and Vitamin E DAIS Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study ETICA Exercise Training Intervention After Coronary Angioplasty MORE Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (Secondary Analysis) CLARIFY Clarithromycin Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Finland ADAM Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial Participants TPT (Angina) Thrombosis Prevention Trial CUDAS Perth Carotid Ultrasound Disease Assessment Study CAPRIE Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events (Substudy) ELSA European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis ENCORE I Evaluation of Nifedipine and Cerivastatin on Recovery of Coronary Endothelial Function Womens Health Initiative Observational Study VEAPS The Vitamin E Atherosclerosis Prevention Study WAVE Womens Angiographic Vitamin and Estrogen Trial Indo-Mediterranean Diet Heart Study SUAVISArterial Arm Sulodexide Arterial Venous Italian Study Arterial Arm PACIFIC Prevention with a Combined Inhibitor and Folic Acid in Coronary Heart Disease HERS II Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Substudy HERS II Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study Follow-up WHI Womens Health Initiative
xxx
Contents
Contents
Page
Acronym/Title
13.
1146 1148
14a.
1158 1160
14b.
1164 1166
14c.
1170
14d.
1174
Contents
xxxi
Acronym/Title XSOLVD Extended Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction Preliminary Report COMPANION Comparison of Medical Therapy, Pacing, and Defibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure
14e.
1182 1184 1186
14f.
1190 1192 1194 1196 1198 1200 1202
xxxii
Contents
Introduction
The purpose of Cardiovascular Trials Review, Eighth Edition, is to review those trials that have made a major impact on the practice of clinical cardiology within the last 5 years. We have included only studies that were published in English and concentrated mainly on publications that have appeared since 1999 and have studied either pharmacological or device therapy. The text is divided into major headings of diseases such as myocardial infarction and unstable angina. In general, we gave priority to prospective randomized trials with preference to multicenter studies. In this eighth edition, we have added more than 130 new entries and concentrated on trials from 20022003. We have included some smaller studies that describe the new drug-eluting stents. The front section of the book concentrates on articles already in print. The preliminary reports section concentrates on studies that have been presented or discussed in abstract or other form at major cardiology meetings within the last year. Some of these studies are ongoing clinical trials. The Trials Listing sets forth studies by disease categories, which are in the Subjects section. The Trials Index at the back of the book alphabetically lists acronyms and the corresponding pages on which the trials can be found, followed by the names of trials without acronyms. We continue to be amazed by the increasing number of new, large clinical trials in the literature. Since the early 90s there has been a virtual explosion of growth in the number of these trials. An article by Cheng (Am Heart J. 1999;137:726765) listed more than 2250 cardiology trials with acronyms. It is common for some acronyms to be used for more than one study (example: PREVENT). Because the seventh edition exceeded 1500 pages, we had to eliminate many studies prior to 1999 to make room for those published in the last 12 years. These earlier studies can be found in the seventh edition of Cardiovascular Trials Review. Unfortunately, we were not able to include all studies in this text. There are many excellent studies that may not appear in this book. However, a review of the trials included in this book should give readers a flavor of the types and designs of major clinical trials that have influenced the practice of clinical cardiology. The drugs, indications for drugs, and drug dosages may or may not be approved for general use by the US Food and Drug Administration. Physicians should consult the package inserts and/or the Physicians Desk Reference for drug indications, contraindications, side effects, and dosages as recommended. Robert A. Kloner, MD, PhD Yochai Birnbaum, MD Jason S. Chi, BS Los Angeles, July 2003
xxxiii
xxxiv
MIRACL
Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (Substudy)
Title
Effects of atorvastatin on stroke in patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Waters DD, Schwartz GG, Olsson AG, et al. Circulation 2002;106:16901695. Hypercholesterolemia; unstable angina, non-Q-wave myocardial infarction; stroke. To determine whether aggressive lowering of lipid levels with a statin reduces the incidence of nonfatal stroke in patients who have had an acute coronary syndrome. Substudy of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. As per MIRACL. 16 weeks. Patients were randomized to atorvastatin (n=1538) 80mg/d or placebo (n=1548) for 16 weeks. All patients were counseled on adherence to the National Cholesterol Education Program Step I diet.
Purpose
Section 8
8. Lipid-Lowering Studies
839
MIRACL
Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (Substudy) (continued)
Results The end point of this substudy was the incidence of fatal and nonfatal stroke. At study entry, the lipid levels between the two groups were similar; the mean level of total cholesterol was 206 mg/dL, 124 mg/dL for LDL cholesterol, 46 mg/dL for HDL cholesterol, and 182 mg/dL for triglycerides. The total and LDL cholesterol had increased slightly in the placebo group at the end of the study. LDL cholesterol had increased 12% in the placebo group, and decreased by 40% in the atorvastatin group. Nonfatal stroke occurred in 22 patients in the placebo group and 9 in the atorvastatin group (relative risk [RR] 0.40; 95% CI=0.190.88; p=0.02). Fatal and nonfatal stroke occurred in 24 patients in the placebo group and 12 in the atorvastatin group (RR 0.49; 95% CI=0.240.98, p=0.04). 3 strokes were classified as hemorrhagic; all were in the placebo group. 8 strokes were classified as either hemorrhagic or undetermined; 5 of these were in the placebo group. All other strokes were either thrombotic or embolic. Patients who developed stroke were older than those who did not, were more likely to be women, and more likely to have a history of heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, or MI. Lipid levels at baseline were similar in patients who developed stroke and those who did not. Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that 2 variables were associated with an increased risk of nonfatal stroke: history of cerebrovascular disease (RR 3.44; 95% CI=1.507.87; p=0.004); and previous MI (RR 1.99; 95% CI=0.964.15; p=0.065). Treatment with atorvastatin had a RR of 0.41 (95% CI=0.190.89; p=0.024) and current smoking had a RR of 0.28 (95% CI=0.080.92; p=0.36). However, further analysis showed that current smokers in the study were younger and less likely to have diabetes, hypertension, history of heart failure, or previous coronary revascularization, which may account for this finding. Aggressive lowering of lipid levels with atorvastatin in patients with an acute coronary syndrome was associated with a significantly reduced risk of stroke in the shortterm (16 weeks) follow-up period.
Conclusions
840
8. Lipid-Lowering Studies
ASCOT-LLA
Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes TrialLipid Lowering Arm
Title
Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-thanaverage cholesterol concentrations, in the AngloScandinavian Cardiac Outcomes TrialLipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR, et al. Lancet 2003;361:11491158. Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia (mild). To study the cardiovascular effects of atorvastatin in hypertensive patients with total cholesterol of 6.5 mmol/L. Randomized, 2 2 factorial design, double-blind, multicenter. The antihypertensive arm is designed as Prospective Randomized Open Blinded end points (PROBE) trial. 10,305 patients, 4079 years old, with untreated hypertension (160/100 mm Hg) or treated hypertension with blood pressure 140/90 mm Hg, who had also serum total cholesterol of 6.5 mmol/L and were not currently taking a fibrate or a statin. In addition, patients had to have 3 of the following risk factors (left ventricular hypertrophy, abnormal ECG, type 2 diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, previous TIA or stroke, male sex, age 55 years, microalbuminuria or proteinuria, smoking, total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio of 6, or premature family history of coronary heart disease). Patients with previous myocardial infarction, angina, a stroke within the preceding 3 months, serum triglycerides >4.5 mmol/L, congestive heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmia or any routine laboratory test showing important hematological or biochemical abnormality were excluded.
8. Lipid-Lowering Studies
Design
Patients
890
ASCOT-LLA
Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes TrialLipid Lowering Arm (continued)
Follow-up Regimen Median 3.3 years. After a 4-week run-in phase, 19,342 patients were randomized to -blockers diuretics or to amlodipine ACE inhibitor. In addition, the eligible patients for the lipid-lowering arm were randomized to atorvastatin 10 mg/d (n=5168) or placebo (n=5137). The study was terminated prematurely by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Compared with placebo, atorvastatin reduced total cholesterol by 1.3 mmol/L, LDL cholesterol by 1.2 mmol/L, and triglycerides by 0.3 mmol/L at 1 year. HDL cholesterol levels were comparable between the groups. The primary end point of the study (nonfatal MI or coronary heart disease death) occurred in 1.9% in the atorvastatin group and in 3.0% in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% CI= 0.500.83; p=0.0005). All-cause mortality was 3.6% and 4.1%, respectively (p=0.165). Cardiovascular mortality was 1.4% and 1.6%, respectively (p=0.51). Stroke occurred in 1.7% and 2.4%, respectively (HR 0.73; 95% CI=0.560.96; p=0.024), and MI in 1.7% and 2.7%, respectively (HR 0.62; 95% CI= 0.470.81; p=0.0005). Total cardiovascular events and procedures occurred in 7.5% and 9.5% of the patients, respectively (HR 0.79; 95% CI=0.690.90; p=0.0005). Coronary events occurred in 3.4% in the atorvastatin and 4.8% in the placebo group (HR 0.71; 95% CI=0.590.86; p=0.0005). The rates of serious adverse events and liver-enzyme elevation were comparable between the atorvastatin and placebo groups. Atorvastatin 10 mg/d reduced major cardiovascular events and stroke in hypertensive patients with high-risk features for cardiovascular disease and normal or only mildly elevated serum cholesterol levels.
Results
Section 8
Conclusions
8. Lipid-Lowering Studies
891
Comparison of the Effects of Atorvastatin Versus Simvastatin on Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Primary Prevention as Determined by Electron Beam Tomography
Title
Comparison of the effects of atorvastatin versus simvastatin on subclinical atherosclerosis in primary prevention as determined by electron beam tomography. Hecht HS, Harman SM. Am J Cardiol 2003;91:4245. Coronary artery disease. To determine the comparative effects of atorvastatin and simvastatin on progression of calcified plaque as determined by electron beam tomography (EBT) in patients without symptomatic coronary artery disease. Observational. 103 patients in the atorvastatin group and 46 in the simvastatin group. No patients had a history of symptomatic CAD. In each group, mean age was approximately 59 years, approximately 27% had hypertension, approximately 5% were smokers, and 60% had a family history of CAD. 2% and 9% of patients in the atorvastatin and simvastatin groups were diabetic, respectively. All differences between the 2 groups were nonsignificant. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were significantly higher in the atorvastatin group at study start than in the simvastatin group (p<0.05). Dosages of the statins and niacin were determined by the treating physicians of the patients and were not established in the protocol. The mean dose of atorvastatin was 14.28.1 mg and simvastatin was 23.711.8 mg. Approximately half of all patients were taking niacin, and the average dose was 1890 and 1875 mg in the atorvastatin and simvastatin groups, respectively.
Design Patients
786
8. Lipid-Lowering Studies
Comparison of the Effects of Atorvastatin Versus Simvastatin on Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Primary Prevention as Determined by Electron Beam Tomography (continued)
Follow-up Regimen 1.2 years. Statin treatment to lower LDL cholesterol as described above and niacin treatment to increase HDL and lower triglycerides as above. Diet, weight loss, exercise, smoking cessation, and aspirin were recommended to all patients. The EBT calcium score and volume score at study start were similar between the 2 groups. The baseline LDL cholesterol, total, and non-HDL cholesterol levels were significantly higher in the atorvastatin group. The EBT percentile was significantly higher in the atorvastatin cohort. The change in total cholesterol in the atorvastatin and simvastatin groups, respectively, was 26.2% and 22.2%; for LDL cholesterol: 39.8% and 34.7%; for HDL: +15.6% and +14.9%; for triglycerides: 22.1% and 18.8%; none of these differences were significant between the statin groups. The change in calcium scores was +10.8% and +7.5%, and the change in volume scores was +8.5% and +7.8% in the atorvastatin and simvastatin groups, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups. The calcium score and volume score were similar between the groups at the end of the study. Treatment with atorvastatin and simvastatin in patients who are asymptomatic for CAD produced an equal progression of calcified plaques as determined by EBT.
Results
Conclusions
Section 8
8. Lipid-Lowering Studies
787
CAPE II Trial
Circadian Anti-Ischemic Program in Europe II
Title
Medical treatment of myocardial ischemia in coronary artery disease: effect of drug regime and irregular dosing in the CAPE II trial. Deanfield JE, Detry J-M, Sellier P, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:917925. Coronary artery disease. To determine the efficacy of amlodipine and diltiazem in preventing ischemia when an irregular dosing pattern is used. Double-blind, randomized, multicenter.
Design Patients
Section 4
250 patients, 128 in the amlodipine group, 122 in diltiazem group. Patients age 2180 years were eligible if they had a history of stable angina (2 attacks/week and no change in symptoms for 1 month), positive exercise test, and at least one other objective finding of coronary artery disease. Exclusion criteria were: congestive heart failure, uncontrolled arrhythmia or hypertension, standing systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, heart rate <50 beats/min, heart block greater than 1 AV-block, or abnormal ECG that would potentially impair the interpretation of study findings. 14 weeks. The study began with a 2-week placebo run-in period during which patients underwent ambulatory ECG monitoring and exercise testing. Patients were then randomized to 6 weeks of treatment with 5 mg amlodipine or 180 mg diltiazem once a day. Two weeks later, the dosages were increased to 10 mg and 300 mg, respectively. 72-hour 333
Follow-up Regimen
CAPE II Trial
Circadian Anti-Ischemic Program in Europe II (continued)
ambulatory ECG monitoring and exercise testing were performed two weeks after the dosage increase. Both groups were given a placebo pill on the third day of ECG monitoring to simulate a missed dose, with exercise testing performed again thereafter. Atenolol, 50 mg once a day, was then added to patients in the amlodipine group and isosorbide 5-mononitrate, 50 mg once a day, was added to patients in the diltiazem group. After 2 weeks of this combined treatment, the dosages of atenolol and isosorbide were each increased to 100 mg daily. At 14 weeks, (total 6 weeks combined treatment) patients underwent 72-hour ambulatory ECG monitoring and exercise testing, with a placebo pill again given for the last 24 hours. Results Age, gender, angina history, incidence of previous MI or revascularization, heart rate, or BP were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Many of the patients were already being treated with aspirin and ACEIs, and use of lipid-lowering drugs was common. The primary outcome measures determined by the ECG records were: total number of ST-segment episodes, total duration of such episodes, and peak ST-segment depression, all recorded during the 48-hour monitoring period while on active drug therapy. Secondary outcome measures were: ECG records from the 24-hour off-medication period, exercise test results, and daily angina diary data. Ischemic events at baseline were similar between the 2 groups. Among the primary outcome measures, there was a significant reduction in transient ST-segment depression events in both groups when compared with baseline, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. During the medication-free period, ischemic suppression was maintained in the amlodipine group; patients in the diltiazem group showed a significantly higher number (p<0.0001), duration (p=0.0002), and peak ST depression (p<0.0001) of ischemic episodes than patients in the amlodipine group. Outcome measures of ischemia determined by ECG were reduced further with the addition of atenolol to amlodipine (p<0.0001) for number, duration, and peak ST depression of ischemic episodes. The combination of
4. Stable Angina Pectoris and Silent IschemiaMedical Therapy
334
CAPE II Trial
Circadian Anti-Ischemic Program in Europe II (continued)
isosorbide 5-mononitrate and diltiazem resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in these measures. During the drug holiday, the amlodipine/atenolol group showed less ischemia than the diltiazem/isosorbide 5-mononitrate group, demonstrated by fewer episodes of ST segment depression (p=0.02) and peak ST segment depression (p=0.02). The atenolol/amlodipine combination resulted in a significant reduction in ischemia in the 24-hour drug holiday period (p<0.001). However, the addition of isosorbide to diltiazem resulted in only a small benefit vs monotherapy. There was significant improvement in ischemia during exercise testing for both amlodipine and diltiazem (time to 1 mm ST depression, amlodipine [477 seconds] vs baseline [430 seconds] and diltiazem [477 seconds] vs baseline [428 seconds], p<0.01 for both). However, diltiazem was much less effective during the medication-free period; (474 seconds for amlodipine vs 443 seconds for diltiazem, p=0.03). During active therapy, the amlodipine/atenolol group showed a significantly increased total exercise time, time to angina onset, and 1 mm ST-segment depression vs the diltiazem/isosorbide group (time to 1mm ST-segment depression 520 seconds on amlodipine/atenolol vs 478 seconds on diltiazem/isosorbide, p<0.05). The drug-free day produced the same results (502 seconds vs 434 seconds, p<0.002). Both monotherapies were highly effective in reducing angina attacks and nitroglycerin consumption (p<0.0001), and combination therapy was more effective than monotherapy in reducing both of these (p<0.0001). Frequently reported adverse effects were edema (12.5% in the amlodipine group, 4.1% in diltiazem), and headache (7.0% and 20.5%, respectively). Conclusions Amlodipine and diltiazem are effective in reducing ischemic episodes when used as monotherapy. The addition of atenolol and isosorbide 5-mononitrate, respectively, further augments this effect. Amlodipine, alone or in combination therapy, is more likely than diltiazem to be beneficial in patients who miss doses, or dose irregularly.
Section 4
335