Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A weekly publication of the Transportation and Marketing Programs/Transportation Services Division www.ams.usda.gov/GTR
Contact Us
WEEKLY HIGHLIGHTS Lower Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico Ports Reopen after Isaac The Lower Mississippi River between the Southwest Pass and Baton Rouge, LA, is open to navigation with no restrictions. All ocean ports in the region are open and operationalno major damage to these facilities has been reported. Most export grain elevators on the Mississippi River have resumed operations. Rail service has been restored to most areas of New Orleans, LA, and to Mobile, AL, including service to grain elevators. Despite Isaacs Deluge, Long-term Drought Still Affecting the Inland Waterways Heavy rain from remnants of Hurricane Isaac brought some relief to the drought-stricken middle part of the country, but the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) still must continue dredging to keep barges moving. River levels rose significantly in strategically important sections around Vicksburg and Greenville, MS, and Memphis, TN. However, the Corps continues to dredge at 11 lowwater spots in the river. Barge traffic is delayed in the vicinity of the dredging activities. In addition, barge operators continue to light-load barges for safe transit throughout the system. As of September 3, there were no reported groundings in the last 48 hours and more importantly no stoppages on the river. Panama Canal Toll Increase Approved On August 7, the Panamanian government approved the proposal to restructure and apply selective increases in the Panama Canal pricing system. The two-stage toll increase will apply to the following market segments: general cargo, dry bulk, tanker, chemical tanker, liquefied petroleum gas, vehicle carriers and ro-ro, and others (see GTR dated 7/5/12 and 4/26/12). The new tolls will be effective October 1, 2012 and October 1, 2013. Changes will also be applied to the small-vessel toll structure based on the vessels length. The tolls for the remaining segments and the price per 20-foot equivalent unit for containers carried onboard a vessel will stay the same for now. For more details, see http://www.pancanal.com/common/maritime/advisories/2012/a-20-2012.pdf Virginia Makes Preparations to Minimize Impact from Potential Strike Talks broke down on August 22 between the International Longshoremens Association (ILA) and the United States Maritime Alliance to create a new six-year contract to replace the current one that expires September 30. If no deal is reached by then, a strike by the 65,000-member ILA would affect ports along the East and Gulf Coast. In response, the Virginia Port Authority announced August 31 that it is making preparations with State-owned cargo terminals to move as much cargo as possible between now and October 1. Port officials believe customers may immediately divert up to 15 percent of cargo to West Coast ports. The Port of Norfolk (including Newport News, Portsmouth, and Chesapeake) rank tenth in the nation for total waterborne agricultural exports with the top three exports soybeans, grain products, and bulk grains representing 60 percent of the ports agricultural exports in 2011. Snapshots by Sector Rail U.S. railroads originated 18,954 carloads of grain during the week ending August 25, up 5 percent from last week, 5 percent from last year, and 6 percent lower than the 3-year average. During the week ending August 30, average September non-shuttle secondary railcar bids/offers per car were $18.50 above tariff, $3 more than last week and $10 higher than last year. Average shuttle bids/offers were $397 below tariff, $30.50 lower than last week and $78 higher than last year. Ocean During the week ending August 30, 29 ocean-going grain vessels were loaded in the Gulf, down 9 percent from the same period last year. Fifty-two vessels are expected to be loaded within the next 10 days, 33 percent more than the same period last year. During the week ending August 31, the ocean freight rate for shipping bulk grain from the Gulf to Japan was $49 per mt, down 2 percent from the previous week. The cost of shipping from the Pacific Northwest to Japan was $25.50 per mt, down 4 percent from the previous week. Barge During the week ending September 1, barge grain movements totaled 253,782 tons, 8 percent lower than the previous week and 27 percent higher than the same period last year. During the week ending September 1, 163 grain barges moved down river, down 11.4 percent from last week; 228 grain barges were unloaded in New Orleans, down 58.8 percent from the previous week. Fuel During the week ending September 3, U.S. average diesel fuel prices increased 4 cents to $4.13 per gallon26 cents higher than the same week last year.
September 6, 2012
Contents
Article/ Calendar Grain Transportation Indicators Rail Barge Truck Exports Ocean Brazil Mexico Grain Truck/Ocean Rate Advisory Data Links
Specialists
Subscription Information
Feature Article/Calendar
Soybean Transportation Cost Decreased As Farm Prices Rose
The transportation cost for shipping soybeans from the United States and Brazil to Europe and China generally declined during the second quarter as farm prices rose. The cost of shipping soybeans from Minneapolis, MN, and Davenport, IA, to Hamburg, Germany, declined 17 and 20 percent, respectively during the second quarter (table 1). The cost of shipping from the same cities to Shanghai, China, through the U.S. Gulf decreased 13 and 14 percent during the quarter (table 2). However, the cost of shipping from Fargo, ND, and Sioux Falls, SD, through the Pacific Northwest (PNW) increased by 3 percent during the quarter. The cost of shipping from North Mato Grosso and South Gois, Brazil, to Hamburg decreased 3 and 1 percent, respectively, during the quarter (table 1). The cost of shipping from North Mato Grosso (MT) to Shanghai decreased by 2 percent, while the cost of shipping from South Gois decreased 1 percent (table 2).
Table 1-Quarterly costs of transporting soybeans from U.S. and Brazil to Hamburg, Germany
2011 2 nd qtr. 2012 1 st qtr. 2012 2nd qtr. Percent change 2011 2012 1 st qtr. 2012 Percent change
Yr. to Yr. Qtr. to Qtr. 2 nd qtr. United States (via U.S. Gulf)
Truck Barge Ocean1 Rail Total transportation2 Farm Value 3 Landed Cost Transport % of landed cost
Minneapolis, MN --$/mt-9.14 11.66 12.53 28.18 19.91 31.61 73.19 447.05 520.24 14.07 20.76 60.60 502.16 562.76 10.77
Davenport, IA --$/mt-9.14 11.66 12.53 20.23 19.91 24.16 65.74 448.27 514.01 12.79 20.76 52.65 503.39 556.04 9.47
Truck Ocean6 Total transportation2 Farm Value 7 Landed Cost Transport % of landed cost
1 3 4 5 6 7
North MT4 - Santos 5 --$/mt-117.52 110.07 -12.52 32.00 149.52 377.70 527.22 28.36 35.00 145.07 448.29 593.36 24.45 0.00 -9.80 15.96 8.39
South GO4 - Paranagua5 --$/mt-55.14 50.51 -28.16 31.58 86.72 401.58 488.30 17.76 35.00 85.51 428.40 513.91 16.64 -2.78 -19.57 3.69 -1.07
Source: O'Neil Commodity Consulting Source: USDA/NASS Producing regions: MT= Mato Grosso, GO = Gois Export ports Source: ESALQ/ USP (University of So Paulo, Brazil) and USDA/AMS Source: Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB) www.conab.gov.br
During the first quarter, the upper section of the Mississippi River was closed for navigation because of icy conditions, so soybean shipments were first railed to St. Louis and then loaded onto barges destined for New Orleans. In the second quarter, barge shipments were made directly from Minneapolis and Davenport to New Orleans and no rail leg was required because the upper Mississippi River had been reopened. In the second quarter, there was an increase in barge rates as the shipments traveled longer distances. Truck and ocean rates also increased. However, for the second quarter, total transportation cost of shipping soybeans through the Gulf decreased as increases in truck, barge and ocean rates were offset by the fact that there was no additional rail cost. Increases in truck and rail costs pushed up the transportation cost of shipping through the PNW in the second quarter. In Brazil, the trucking rates fell during the quarter, which lowered the transportation cost to Europe and from North MT to China. There was a modest increase in the cost of shipping from South GO to China because increased ocean freight rates through the port of Paranagu were not offset by the decrease in truck rates.
September 6, 2012
The year-to-year transportation cost was lower in both the United States and Brazil. For the U.S. the drop was mostly because of lower barge rates. In Brazil, the lower year-to-year reduction in transportation cost was due to lower truck costs. Farm prices increased in the United States and Brazil at all locations from the previous quarter and from a year ago. In the United States, transportation costs represented 1011 percent of the landed costs to Hamburg, and 1416 percent of the landed costs to Shanghai. The transportation share of the landed costs for Brazilian soybeans to Hamburg ranged from 1724 percent, and to Shanghai ranged from 2026 percent.
Table 2-Quarterly costs of transporting soybeans from U.S. and Brazil to Shanghai, China
2011 2 nd qtr. 2012 1 st qtr. 2012 Percent change 2011 2012 2012 Percent change
Truck Barge Ocean1 Rail Total transportation2 Farm Value 3 Landed Cost Transport % of landed cost
2 nd qtr. Yr. to Yr. Qtr. to Qtr. 2 nd qtr. 1 st qtr. 2 nd qtr. Yr. to Yr. Qtr. to Qtr. United States (via U.S. Gulf) Minneapolis, MN Davenport, IA --$/mt---$/mt-9.14 11.66 2.82 27.57 11.34 9.14 11.66 2.82 27.57 12.53 28.18 -24.37 124.90 27.27 12.53 20.23 -25.82 61.45 48.33 31.61 49.07 88.91 502.16 591.07 15.04 Fargo, ND 11.66 25.71 54.89 92.26 493.59 585.85 15.75 -4.87 -11.25 7.89 4.50 1.53 -12.50 12.33 7.73 51.58 90.19 48.33 24.16 94.16 448.27 542.43 17.36 49.07 80.96 503.39 584.35 13.85 -4.87 -10.23 4.58 2.24 1.53 -14.02 12.30 7.73
481.34 571.53 15.78 Via PNW 11.34 28.88 53.90 94.12 471.54 565.66 16.64
Truck Ocean1 Rail Total transportation2 Farm Value 3 Landed Cost Transport % of landed cost
Sioux Falls, SD 9.14 11.66 26.54 56.00 91.68 445.82 537.50 17.06 25.71 56.73 94.10 496.04 590.14 15.95
Brazil North MT4 - Santos 5 --$/mt-117.52 110.07 -12.52 46.62 164.14 377.70 541.84 30.29 51.35 161.42 448.29 609.71 26.47 2.60 -8.22 15.96 8.40 South GO4 - Paranagua5 --$/mt-55.14 50.51 -28.16 52.32 107.46 401.58 509.04 21.11 57.63 108.14 428.40 536.54 20.16 0.02 -15.47 3.62 -0.89
Truck Ocean6 Total transportation2 Farm Value 7 Landed Cost Transport % of landed cost
1 3 4 5 6 7
Source: O'Neil Commodity Consulting Source: USDA/NASS Producing regions: MT= Mato Grosso, GO = Gois Export ports Source: ESALQ/ USP (University of So Paulo, Brazil) and USDA/AMS Source: Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB) www.conab.gov.br
Market Outlook: From January through June, 9.81 million metric tons (mmt) of U.S. soybeans were exported to China; approximately 2 mmt were exported during the second quarter113 percent of the same period last year. The value of the second quarter exports was $1.12 billion dollar, 124 percent above the same period last year. During the second quarter, 0.31 mmt of U.S. soybeans, valued at $165 million, were exported to Europe, compared to only 636 mt during the same period last year. Chinese demand for U.S. soybeans is fueled by a strong demand for protein meals. Chinas imports of soybeans are forecast to reach 60 mmt during the marketing year (MY) 2012/13, compared to 57 mmt in MY11/12, which was revised upward from a previous estimate of 55.5 mmt (USDA, FAS, GAIN Report No. CH12042). As grain prices remain relatively high and Chinese demand for soybeans remains strong, it is essential that the transportation costs remain low to keep U.S. exports competitive. For more on soybean transportation, see Brazil Soybean Transportation. Surajudeen.olowolayemo@ams.usda.gov
September 6, 2012
277
1%
219
- 2%
274
227
243
224
188
Indicator: Base year 2000 = 100; Weekly updates include truck = diesel ($/gallon); rail = near-month secondary rail market bid and monthly tariff rate with fuel surcharge ($/car); barge = Illinois River barge rate (index = percent of tariff rate); and ocean = routes to Japan ($/metric ton) Source: Transportation & Marketing Programs/AMS/USDA
Table 2
The grain bid summary illustrates the market relationships for commodities. Positive and negative adjustments in differential between terminal and futures markets, and the relationship to inland market points, are indicators of changes in fundamental market supply and demand. The map may be used to monitor market and time differentials. Figure 1 Grain bid Summary
September 6, 2012
Rail Transportation
Table 3
Mississippi Gulf 1 629 6,894 21,963 31 708 90 27,358 33,971 Texas Gulf 224 578 25,285 63,592 40 58 35 77,515 83,492
Pacific Northwest 3,208 4,648 138,217 128,216 108 159 137 191,092 177,896
Atlantic & East Gulf 39 246 11,587 16,882 69 74 67 24,088 32,780 Total 4,032 6,659 219,311 262,717 83 127 97 368,835 370,933
Data is incomplete as it is voluntarily provided Compared with same 4-weeks in 2011 and prior 4-year average.
YTD = year-to-date; p = preliminary data; r = revised data; YTD PNW carloads includes revisions back to August 2011 ; n/a = not available Source: Transportation & Marketing Programs/AMS/USDA
Railroads originate approximately 29 percent of U.S. grain shipments. Trends in these loadings are indicative of market conditions and expectations.
Figure 2
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
03/03/10
04/28/10
08/18/10
12/08/10
02/02/11
05/25/11
07/20/11
11/09/11
02/29/12
04/25/12
08/15/12
10/10/12
01/06/10
06/23/10
10/13/10
03/30/11
09/14/11
01/04/12
06/20/12
Pacific Northwest: 4wks. ending 8/29--up 59% from same period last year; up 37% from 4-year average Texas Gulf: 4 wks. ending 8/29-- down 42% from same period last year; down 65% from 4-year average Miss. River: 4 wks. Ending 8/29-- up 608 % from same period last year; down 10% from 4-year average Cross-border Mexico: 4 wks. ending 8/29 -- down 29% from same period last year; down 20% from 4-year average
September 6, 2012
12/05/12
Table 4
U.S. total UP 4,471 5,173 172,228 200,247 86 84 77 292,401 18,954 18,046 673,054 747,792 90 105 95 1,122,549 CN
Canada CP 4,866 5,452 161,262 173,251 93 89 96 269,399 3,891 3,406 130,678 130,013 101 117 106 200,610
As a percent of the same period in 2009 and the prior 3-year average. YTD = year-to-date.
Figure 3
09/24/11
01/14/12
02/11/12
06/02/12
06/30/12
10/22/11
11/19/11
12/17/11
03/10/12
04/07/12
05/05/12
07/28/12
08/25/12
3-year average
Table 5
Delivery period
Sep-12 0 0..6 no bids no bids Sep-11 no offer no offer no bids no bids Oct-12 0 0 . . 23 no bids no bids Oct-11 no offer no offer no bids 16 Nov-12 no bids no offer no bids no bids Nov-11 no offer no offer no bids 1 Dec-12 no offer no offer n/a n/a Dec-11 no offer 0 . . 100 n/a n/a
Auction offerings are for single-car and unit train shipments only. Average premium/discount to tariff, last auction BNSF - COT = Certificate of Transportation; north grain and south grain bids were combined effective the week ending 6/24/06. UP - GCAS = Grain Car Allocation System Region 1 includes: AR, IL, LA, MO, NM, OK, TX, WI, and Duluth, MN. Region 2 includes: CO, IA, KS, MN, NE, WY, and Kansas City and St. Joseph, MO. Range is shown because average is not available. Not available = n/a.
September 6, 2012
09/22/12
16,000
The secondary rail market information reflects trade values for service that was originally purchased from the railroad carrier as some form of guaranteed freight. The auction and secondary rail values are indicators of rail service quality and demand/ supply.
Figure 4
300 100
6/7/12
7/5/12
3/15/12
4/12/12
5/10/12
8/2/12
3/1/12
8/30/12
3/29/12
4/26/12
5/24/12
6/21/12
7/19/12
8/16/12
Non-shuttle Non-shuttle avg. 2009-11 (same week) Non-shuttle bids include unit-train and single-car bids. n/a = not available. Source: Transportation & Marketing Programs/AMS/USDA
Figure 5
There were no non-shuttle bids/offers this week. Shuttle bids/offers rose $50 this week and are $325 below the peak.
0 -200 -400
3/22/12
BNSF Non-shuttle n/a Shuttle n/a UP n/a $275
Non-shuttle bids include unit-train and single-car bids. n/a = not available. Source: Transportation & Marketing Programs/AMS/USDA
September 6, 2012
10/18/12
4/5/12
5/3/12
8/9/12
5/31/12
6/28/12
7/26/12
8/23/12
9/6/12
10/4/12
4/19/12
5/17/12
6/14/12
7/12/12
9/20/12
9/13/12
Figure 6
600 400
200
Non-shuttle Shuttle
0
-200
There were no non-shuttle bids/offers this week. There were no shuttle bids/offers this week.
10/18/12
Non-shuttle
Non-shuttle avg. 2009-11 (same week)
Shuttle
Shuttle avg. 2009-11 (same week)
Non-shuttle bids include unit-train and single-car bids. n/a = not available. Source: Transportation & Marketing Programs/AMS/USDA
Table 6
Delivery period Sep-12 37 12 33 (6) (13) (244) 64 206 (550) (125) (50) Oct-12 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 275 25 (225) Nov-12 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Dec-12 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Jan-13 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Feb-13 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Shuttle bids are a new data series; prior to this we provided only non-shuttle rates. Note: Bids listed are market INDICATORS only & are NOT guaranteed prices, n/a = not available; GF = guaranteed freight; Pool = guaranteed pool Sources: Transportation and Marketing Programs/AMS/USDA Data from Atwood/ConAgra, Harvest States Co-op, James B. Joiner Co., Tradewest Brokerage Co.
11/15/12
5/3/12
8/9/12
4/19/12
5/17/12
5/31/12
6/14/12
6/28/12
7/12/12
7/26/12
8/23/12
9/6/12
-400
9/20/12
10/4/12
11/1/12
September 6, 2012
Table 7
Wheat
Wichita, KS Grand Forks, ND Wichita, KS Wichita, KS Sioux Falls, SD Northwest KS Amarillo, TX Champaign-Urbana, IL Toledo, OH Des Moines, IA Indianapolis, IN Indianapolis, IN Des Moines, IA
St. Louis, MO Duluth-Superior, MN Los Angeles, CA New Orleans, LA Galveston-Houston, TX Galveston-Houston, TX Los Angeles, CA New Orleans, LA Raleigh, NC Davenport, IA Atlanta, GA Knoxville, TN Little Rock, AR Los Angeles, CA New Orleans, LA Huntsville, AL Raleigh, NC Huntsville, AL New Orleans, LA Portland, OR Galveston-Houston, TX Albany, NY Portland, OR Galveston-Houston, TX Portland, OR Portland, OR Tacoma, WA New Orleans, LA Galveston-Houston, TX Amarillo, TX Tacoma, WA Stockton, CA Tacoma, WA Portland, OR Tacoma, WA New Orleans, LA Huntsville, AL Portland, OR
$3,144 $3,537 $6,026 $3,645 $5,573 $3,912 $4,112 $3,038 $4,382 $1,934 $3,821 $3,273 $3,074 $4,985 $3,179 $3,497 $4,453 $3,189 $3,382 $3,481 $3,634 $3,645 $4,963 $5,984 $4,880 $4,800 $4,760 $2,857 $3,310 $3,430 $4,800 $4,200 $5,040 $5,030 $4,930 $3,420 $2,672 $4,720
$167 $92 $474 $294 $389 $322 $448 $332 $381 $70 $286 $183 $207 $602 $357 $271 $384 $183 $332 $273 $212 $357 $471 $491 $528 $574 $525 $332 $306 $260 $569 $589 $525 $574 $467 $383 $271 $540
$32.88 $36.04 $64.55 $39.11 $59.21 $42.04 $45.28 $33.47 $47.30 $19.90 $40.78 $34.32 $32.58 $55.48 $35.12 $37.41 $48.03 $33.49 $36.88 $37.28 $38.20 $39.74 $53.96 $64.30 $53.70 $53.36 $52.49 $31.67 $35.91 $36.64 $53.32 $47.55 $55.27 $55.65 $53.60 $37.76 $29.22 $52.24
$0.89 $0.98 $1.76 $1.06 $1.61 $1.14 $1.23 $0.91 $1.29 $0.54 $1.11 $0.93 $0.89 $1.51 $0.96 $1.02 $1.31 $0.91 $1.00 $1.01 $1.04 $1.08 $1.47 $1.75 $1.46 $1.45 $1.43 $0.86 $0.98 $1.00 $1.45 $1.29 $1.50 $1.51 $1.46 $1.03 $0.80 $1.42
4 13 4 3 2 3 2 6 14 4 17 17 4 1 -4 17 14 20 -2 6 13 3 4 3 2 1 1 5 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 -8 4 3
Corn
Soybeans
Shuttle Train
Wheat
Corn
Great Falls, MT Wichita, KS Chicago, IL Grand Forks, ND Grand Forks, ND Northwest KS Minneapolis, MN Sioux Falls, SD Champaign-Urbana, IL Lincoln, NE Des Moines, IA Minneapolis, MN Council Bluffs, IA Sioux Falls, SD Minneapolis, MN Fargo, ND Council Bluffs, IA Toledo, OH Grand Island, NE
Soybeans
A unit train refers to shipments of at least 25 cars. Shuttle train rates are available for qualified shipments of 75-120 cars that meet railroad efficiency requirements.
2 3
Approximate load per car = 111 short tons (100.7 metric tons): corn 56 lbs./bu., wheat & soybeans 60 lbs./bu. Percentage change year over year calculated using tariff rate plus fuel surchage
Sources: www.bnsf.com, www.cpr.ca, www.csx.com, www.uprr.com *Regional economic areas defined by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)
September 6, 2012
Table 8
Corn
Soybeans
Sorghum
Rates are based upon published tariff rates for high-capacity shuttle trains. Shuttle trains are available for qualified Fuel surcharge adjusted to reflect the change in Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V railroad fuel surcharge policy as of 10/01/2009 Approximate load per car = 97.87 metric tons: Corn & Sorghum 56 lbs/bu, Wheat & Soybeans 60 lbs/bu Percentage change year over year calculated using tariff rate plus fuel surchage Beginning 12/6/10, El Castillo, JA replaced Penjamo, GJ as the destination
Figure 7
Weighted by each Class I railroad's proportion of grain traffic for the prior year. * Mileage-based fuel surcharges for March and April 2007 are estimated. Beginning January 2009, the Canadian Pacific fuel surcha rge is computed by a monthly average of the bi-weekly fuel surcharge. ** BNSF strike price (diesel price when fuel surcharges begin) changed from $1.25/gal. to $2.50/gal starting March 1, 2011. As a result, the weighted average fuel surcharge for March 2011 was $0.227/mile instead of $0.331/mile . Sources: www.bnsf.com, www.cn.ca, www.cpr.ca, www.csx.com, www.kcsi.com, www.nscorp.com, www.uprr.com
Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12
10 September 6, 2012
$0.00
Barge Transportation
Figure 8
Percent of tariff
Week ending September 4: up 14 perent from last week, up 4 percent from last year, and up 19 percent from the 3-yr average
2/7/2012
3/6/2012
4/3/2012
9/6/2011
5/1/2012
8/7/2012
11/29/2011
12/27/2011
10/18/2011
11/15/2011
12/13/2011
10/4/2011
1/10/2012
1/24/2012
2/21/2012
3/20/2012
4/17/2012
5/29/2012
6/26/2012
7/24/2012
9/20/2011
11/1/2011
5/15/2012
6/12/2012
7/10/2012
Rate = percent of 1976 tariff benchmark index (1976 = 100 percent); 2 4-week moving average of the 3-year average.
Table 9
St. Louis Cincinnati 533 500 21.27 19.95 30 40 -2 508 325 495 438 23.22 20.54 2 10 6 533 400
8/21/2012
October December
Rate = percent of 1976 tariff benchmark index (1976 = 100 percent); 2 4-week moving average; ton = 2,000 pounds: - closed for winter
Calculating barge rate per ton: (Index * 1976 tariff benchmark rate per ton)/100 Select applicable index from market quotes included in tables on this page. The 1976 benchmark rates per ton are provided in map (see figure 9).
11
September 6, 2012
9/4/2012
Figure 10
1,000 tons
600 500
09/03/11
09/17/11
02/18/12
03/03/12
03/17/12
03/31/12
08/18/12
09/01/12
09/15/12
Table 10
Weekly total, YTD (year-to-date) and calendar year total includes Miss/27, Ohio/52, and Ark/1; "Other" refers to oats, barley, sorghum, and rye. As a percent of same period in 2011.
Note: Total may not add exactly, due to rounding Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (www.mvr.usace.army.mil/mvrimi/omni/webrpts/default.asp)
12
September 6, 2012
09/29/12
10/01/11
10/15/11
10/29/11
11/12/11
11/26/11
12/10/11
12/24/11
01/07/12
01/21/12
02/04/12
04/14/12
04/28/12
05/12/12
05/26/12
06/09/12
06/23/12
07/07/12
07/21/12
08/04/12
Figure 11
Upbound Empty Barges Transiting Mississippi River Locks 27, Arkansas River Lock and Dam 1, and Ohio River Locks and Dam 52
700
600
Week ending September 1: 367 total barges, up 8 barges from the previous week but 15.4 percent lower than the 3-year average.
Number of Barges
500
400
300
200
100
0
5/12/12
5/26/12
7/21/12
Lock 27
Lock 1
Lock 52
Figure 12
600
100 0
Week ending Sep 1: 163 grain barges moved down river, down 11.4 percent from the previous week, 228 grain barges were unloaded in New Orleans, down 58.8 percent from the previous week.
3/10/12 3/17/12 3/24/12 3/31/12 4/14/12 4/21/12 4/28/12 5/12/12
5/19/12 5/26/12 6/16/12 6/23/12 6/30/12 7/14/12 7/21/12 7/28/12 8/11/12 8/18/12 8/25/12
4/7/12
5/5/12
3/3/12
6/2/12
6/9/12
7/7/12
8/4/12
8/18/12
4/28/12
6/23/12
7/7/12
6/9/12
8/4/12
13
September 6, 2012
9/1/12
Truck Transportation
The weekly diesel price provides a proxy for trends in U.S. truck rates as diesel fuel is a significant expense for truck grain movements.
Table 11
Location
Price 4.104 4.194 4.153 4.051 4.072 4.026 4.217 4.424 4.343 4.493 4.127
We e k ago 0.032 0.062 0.024 0.032 0.022 0.045 0.068 0.071 0.055 0.084 0.038
Ye ar ago 0.218 0.200 0.166 0.218 0.220 0.226 0.327 0.443 0.435 0.259
Gulf Coast3 Rocky Mountain West Coast West Coast less California California
Total
1 2
U.S.
3
Diesel fuel prices include all taxes. Prices represent an average of all types of diesel fuel. Same as North Central Same as South Central
Figure 13
Last year
Current Year
$ per gallon
Source: Retail On-Highway Diesel Prices, Energy Information Administration, Dept. of Energy
14
September 6, 2012
Grain Exports
Table 12
Corn DUR 107 141 131 149 88 76 979 983 All wheat 4,698 5,084 6,230 7,118 88 96 32,984 21,400 2,021 3,540 37,664 44,569 85 76 44,569 47,700
Soybeans
Total
Current unshipped export sales to date Shipped export sales to date; the new marketing year is now in effect for wheat
Note: YTD = year-to-date. Marketing Year: wheat = 6/01-5/31, corn & soybeans = 9/01-8/31 Source: Foreign Agricultural Service/USDA (www.fas.usda.gov)
Table 13
Exports 3 2010/11
- 1,000 mt -
Next MY Current MY Japan Mexico Korea China* Taiwan Top 5 importers Total US corn export sales
% of Projected
Change from prior week Top 5 importers' share of U.S. corn export sales USDA forecast, August 2012 Corn Use for Ethanol USDA forecast, Ethanol August 2012
(n) indicates negative number.
1 2
(15) (0.4)
Based on FAS Marketing Year Ranking Reports - www.fas.usda.gov; Marketing year (MY) = Sep 1 - Aug 31.
Cumulative Exports (shipped) + Outstanding Sales (unshipped), FAS Weekly Export Sales Report, or Export Sales Query-http://www.fas.usda.gov/esrquery/
3
*China -- New to the Top 5 in the 2011/12 Marketing Year, replacing Egypt.
15
September 6, 2012
Table 14
% change current MY from last MY (4) (3) (16) (53) (9) (8) (8)
Exports 3 2010/11
- 1,000 mt -
Next MY Current MY China Mexico Japan EU Indonesia Top 5 importers Total US soybean export sales
% of Projected
Change from prior week Top 5 importers' share of U.S. soybean export sales USDA forecast, August 2012
(n) indicates negative number.
1 2
(10)
Based on FAS 2008/09 Marketing Year Ranking Reports - www.fas.usda.gov; Marketing year (MY) = Sep 1 - Aug 31.
Cumulative Exports (shipped) + Outstanding Sales (unshipped), FAS Weekly Export Sales Report, or Export Sales Query-http://www.fas.usda.gov/esrquery/
3
Table 15
% change current MY from last MY (17) (2) (14) (19) 57 (47) 74 (11) 51 (63) (8) (10)
Exports 3 2011/12
- 1,000 mt -
Japan Mexico Nigeria Philippines Korea Egypt Taiwan Indonesia Venezuela Iraq Top 10 importers Total US wheat export sales
% of Projected
1,430 1,457 1,154 894 780 131 439 332 362 209 7,187 10,928
33%
1,729 1,487 1,337 1,104 497 247 253 374 239 564 7,830 12,202
43%
3,512 3,496 3,248 2,039 1,983 950 888 830 594 572 18,111 28,530
Change from prior week Top 10 importers' share of U.S. wheat export sales USDA forecast, August 2012
509
66%
369
64% 63%
32,660
28,560
14
(n) indicates negative number. 1 Modified from the FAS 2011/12 Marketing Year Ranking Reports - www.fas.usda.gov; Marketing year = Jun 1 - May 31.
2
Cumulative Exports (shipped) + Outstanding Sales (unshipped), FAS Weekly Export Sales Report, or Export Sales Query--http://www.fas.usda.gov/esrquery/
3
16
September 6, 2012
Table 16 Grain Inspections for Export by U.S. Port Region (1,000 metric tons) Port regions Pacific Northwest Wheat Corn Soybeans Total Mississippi Gulf Wheat Corn Soybeans Total Texas Gulf Wheat Corn Soybeans Total Interior Wheat Corn Soybeans Total Great Lakes Wheat Corn Soybeans Total Atlantic Wheat Corn Soybeans Total
2
Week ending 08/30/12 456 0 66 521 123 88 304 515 111 0 0 111 3 74 33 110 0 0 1 1 0 0 8 8
Current Week as % of Previous 2012 YTD1 111 0 97 109 266 31 91 77 211 0 n/a 198 71 92 50 73 n/a 0 n/a 11 47 n/a 103 96 9,294 4,910 5,676 19,880 4,184 13,176 12,027 29,387 4,243 329 5 4,576 784 5,030 2,816 8,630 193 56 149 397 237 106 616 959
2011 YTD1 9,926 6,773 3,651 20,350 3,809 17,867 10,541 32,218 8,748 810 763 10,321 758 4,888 2,617 8,263 744 124 22 890 641 194 476 1,311
2012 YTD as % of 2011 YTD 94 72 155 98 110 74 114 91 49 41 1 44 103 103 108 104 26 45 666 45 37 54 130 73
Last 4-weeks as % of 2011 3-yr. avg. 147 35 178 116 73 54 270 93 72 n/a n/a 78 72 104 53 49 10 32 n/a 19 7 58 205 72 170 22 137 103 94 47 164 78 61 23 0 54 66 64 122 78 5 51 0 12 6 23 179 52 107 43 153 80
Total 2011
13,995 9,198 7,321 30,513 5,031 26,267 19,262 50,560 10,837 1,021 926 12,784 1,110 7,509 4,273 12,892 1,038 178 382 1,598 686 295 1,042 2,022 32,697 44,466 33,205 110,369
U.S. total from ports Wheat 693 515 135 18,934 24,627 77 104 Corn 162 383 42 23,606 30,657 77 53 Soybeans 412 476 87 21,289 18,071 118 192 Total 1,267 1,374 92 63,829 73,354 87 92 1 Data includes revisions from prior weeks; some regional totals may not add exactly due to rounding. 2 Total includes only port regions shown above; Interior land-based shipments now included. Source: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration/USDA (www.gipsa.usda.gov); YTD= year-to-date; n/a = not applicable
The United States exports approximately one-quarter of the grain it produces. On average, this includes nearly 45 percent of U.S.-grown wheat, 35 percent of U.S.-grown soybeans, and 20 percent of the U.S.-grown corn. Approximately 59 percent of the U.S. export grain shipments departed through the U.S. Gulf region in 2011.
17
September 6, 2012
Figure 14
20 0
02/03/11
04/28/11
07/21/11
09/15/11
12/08/11
03/01/12
04/26/12
07/19/12
10/11/12
Current week
3-year average.
Source: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration/USDA (www.gipsa.usda.gov) Note: 3-year average consists of 4-week running average
Figure 15
U.S. Grain Inspections: U.S. Gulf and PNW1 (wheat, corn, and soybeans)
80 70
60 50
40 30 20
19.1*
19.1*
10 0
10/5/10 11/5/11 10/5/12
11/5/10 12/5/10 10/5/11 12/5/11
4.1*
11/5/12
Source: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration/USDA (www.gipsa.usda.gov); *mbu, this week. August 30 % change from: Last week Last year (same week) 3-yr avg. (4-wk mov. avg.) M S Gulf down 24 down 16 down 43 TX Gulf up 97 down 38 down 46 U.S. Gulf down 15 down 21 down 44 PNW up 9 up 12 down 0.1
18
September 6, 2012
12/5/12
9/5/10
1/5/11
4/5/11
5/5/11
8/5/11
6/5/12
7/5/12
9/5/12
8/5/10
2/5/11
3/5/11
6/5/11
7/5/11
9/5/11
1/5/12
2/5/12
3/5/12
4/5/12
5/5/12
8/5/12
12/06/12
01/06/11
03/03/11
03/31/11
05/26/11
06/23/11
08/18/11
10/13/11
11/10/11
01/05/12
02/02/12
03/29/12
05/24/12
06/21/12
08/16/12
09/13/12
11/08/12
Ocean Transportation
Table 17
Number of vessels
Week ending August 30 Change from last year Change from 4-year avg.
04/26/2012
05/24/2012
06/21/2012
07/19/2012
08/02/2012
08/16/2012
19
September 6, 2012
08/30/2012
05/10/2012
06/07/2012
07/05/2012
Figure 17
50
US$/metric ton
40
30
20
10
0
Oct. 10
Dec. 10
Oct. 11
Dec. 11
Apr. 11
Aug. 10
Aug. 11
Apr. 12
Table 18
Import region China China China China China Djibouti1 China Algeria China China Egypt Turkey Algeria Algeria Tunisia Tunisia Egypt Med
Grain types Heavy Grain Heavy Grain Heavy Grain Heavy Grain Heavy Grain Sorghum Grain Corn Heavy Grain Heavy Grain Corn Wheat Corn Corn Heavy Grain Soybean Meal Wheat
Loading date Sep 20/30 Sep 13/22 Sep 10/20 Sep 10/20 Sep 1/10 Aug 18/28 Jul 26/Aug 4 Aug 18/25 Aug10/20 Jul 25/30 Aug 18/20 Sep 10/25 Aug 20/30 Jul 5/15 Aug 17/20 Sep 1/10 Aug 17/23
Volume loads (metric tons) 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 17,500 65,000 30,000 60,000 60,000 45,000 55,000 25,000 25,000 30,000 25,000 60,000
Freight rate (US$/metric ton) 48.00 45.50 46.00 48.00 47.00 98.28 19.45 24.50 48.50 49.00 28.50 24.75 32.50 34.00 28.50 36.00 12.00
Rates shown are for metric ton (2,204.62 lbs. = 1 metric ton), F.O.B., except where otherwise indicates; op = option 75 percent of food aid from the United States is required to be shipped on U.S.-flag vessels.
20
September 6, 2012
Aug. 12
June 11
Feb. 12
Feb. 11
June 12
In 2011, containers were used to transport 7 percent of total U.S. waterborne grain exports, up 2 percentage points from 2010. Approximately 11 percent of U.S. waterborne grain exports in 2011 went to Asia, up 4 percentage points from 2010. Asia is the top destination for U.S. containerized grain exports96 percent in 2011.
Figure 18
Top 10 Destination Markets for U.S. Containerized Grain Exports, May 2012
Indonesia 17%
Taiwan 15%
Korea 6%
Vietnam 6%
Thailand 5%
Japan 5% Philippines 2% Hong Kong Malaysia 2% 1%
Source: USDA/Agricultural Marketing Service/Transportation Services Division analysis of Port Import Export Reporting Service (PIERS) data Note: The following Harmonized Tariff Codes are used to calculate containerized grains movements: 100190, 100200, 100300, 100400, 100590, 100700, 110100, 230310, 110220, 110290, 120100, 230210, 230990, 230330, and 120810.
Sep.
Feb.
Jul.
Oct.
Nov.
Aug.
Mar.
May
Jun.
Jan.
Source: USDA/Agricultural Marketing Service/Transportation Services Division analysis of Port Import Export Reporting Service (PIERS) data Note: The following Harmonized Tariff Codes are used to calculate containerized grains movements: 100190, 100200, 100300, 100400, 100590, 100700, 110100, 230310, 110220, 110290, 120100, 230210, 230990, 230330, and 120810.
21
September 6, 2012
Dec.
60 57 54 51 48 45 42 39 36 33 30 27 24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0
May 2012: Up 14.8% from May 2011 and up 49% from the 4-year average
Apr.
Subscription Information: Send relevant information to GTRContactUs@ams.usda.gov for an electronic copy (printed copies are also available upon request).
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex (including gender identity and expression), marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, political beliefs, genetic information, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Stop 9410, Washington, DC 20250-9410. Or call toll-free at (866) 632-9992 (English) or (800) 877-8339 (TDD) or (866) 377-8642 (English Federal-relay) or (800) 845-6136 (Spanish Federal-relay). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
22
September 6, 2012