AMERICAN IDOL SHOCKER

PAGE 26
75 CITY & SUBURBS $2 ELSEWHERE | LATE SPORTS FINAL | FRIDAY, MARCH 25, 2011 | SUNTIMES.COM | RUDE 350 220 Page 21

ALV AREZ CALLSFOR INVESTIGATION OFPOLICE

States attorney calls for State Police to probe Chicago Police Departments handling of homicide case involving Daley nephew
BY TIM NOVAK AND CAROL MARIN | PAGE 7
Cook County States Attorney Anita Alvarez discusses the investigation of David Koschmans homicide in her office Thursday. | RICHARD A. CHAPMAN~SUN-TIMES

WHO KILLED DAVID KOSCHMAN? | A WATCHDOGS INVESTIGATION

movies

Diary of a Wimpy Kid stands up strong | RICHARD ROEPER

CUT CITY COUNCIL IN HALF?

PAGE 2

RAHM ASKS:

YOU GOT GAME?

SEE INSIDE FOR DETAILS

FRIDAY, MARCH 25, 2011 | CHICAGO SUN-TIMES | 7

Calls for State Police to probe handling of homicide case involving Daley nephew
BY TIM NOVAK AND CAROL MARIN

ALVAREZWANTS INVESTIGATIONOF POLICE

Staff Reporters

WHO KILLED DAVID KOSCHMAN? | A WATCHDOGS INVESTIGATION

ook County States Attorney Anita Alvarez asked the Illinois State Police on Thursday to investigate the Chicago Police Departments handling of a homicide case involving Richard J. R.J. Vanecko, whos a nephew of Mayor Daley and White House Chief of Staff William Daley. I think there should be an independent police investigation, Alvarez said. She pointed to a series of stories in the Chicago Sun-Times this month that raised questions about the police investigation into the violent death of David Koschman seven years ago. Earlier this month, the police closed the case after taking a second look into what happened. They decided that Vanecko acted in self-defense when he punched Koschman in the face, knocking the 21-year-old from Mount Prospect backward to the street during a drunken confrontation near Rush Street in the early-morning hours of April 25, 2004. According to detectives reports, witnesses including four Koschman friends described the 5-foot-5, 140-pound Koschman as being physically aggressive toward the 6-foot-3, 230-pound Vanecko and a group of Vaneckos friends. In interviews with the SunTimes, Koschmans friends denied that thats what they told the police. And all told the police earlier this year they would take lie-detector tests if asked.

I would welcome an independent agency looking into this, like the state police, Alvarez said, basically to determine if it was a complete investigation and whether the witnesses statements were accurately recorded . . . Im unaware of the police department doing anything underhanded. The police have said they initially ended their investigation of the case in 2004 without filing charges because no witness could positively identify Vanecko in a police lineup held 25 days after Koschman was punched on Division Street at Dearborn. One of Koschmans friends, Scott Allen, told the Sun-Times and NBC5 that he was next to Koschman when he got punched and that, despite what the police say, he believes he did pick Vanecko out of a lineup. After reinvestigating the case starting in January, the police formally closed the case March 1, again without seeking charges. This time, they said they determined that Vanecko punched Koschman but acted in self-defense. Alvarez, in a letter Thursday evening to Patrick Keen, the interim director of the Illinois State Police, noted the discrepancy between what Allen says and what the police said he told them. According to new information brought to my attention, some witnesses now suggest that the versions of events attributed to them in CPD reports from 2004 were not accurate, including one witness who now claims that his observations during one of the

States Attorney Anita Alvarez discusses the David Koschman homicide investigation Thursday in her office. | RICHARD A. CHAPMAN~SUN-TIMES
lineups conducted were not accurately memorialized in police reports, Alvarez wrote. To be clear, at this point, I have no objective evidence to support the notion that there was any misfeasance or malfeasance on the part of investigators in this case. However, with this new information, it is my belief that an independent investigation from a separate police agency is clearly warranted to ensure that we reach the truth in this case. Though Keen is interim superintendent of the Illinois State Police, the decision on whether to accept Alvarezs request might not fall to him. On Tuesday, SunTimes columnist Michael Sneed reported that Alvarezs deputy chief of investigations, Hiram Grau, is leaving that post to become the new state police superintendent. Grau is a former deputy superintendent with the Chicago Police Department, where he served for 28 years, leaving in 2008. Its not clear whether the state police have jurisdiction to do what Alvarez is asking. Alvarez, who held the No. 3 spot in the prosecutors office in 2004, under States Attorney Richard Devine, said she does not believe that Vanecko was treated any differently by her office than any other crime suspect is treated. I cant speak for the Chicago Police Department, but I can tell you from our office that we handled this like we would handle any other case, Alvarez said. It doesnt matter who you are. If the facts are there and we can prove a case, we will bring it forward. She said that, although the police closed the case March 1 without consulting her office, she has reviewed detectives official reports and also their so-called street files and thinks the department made the correct decision not to seek charges even after concluding that Vanecko punched Koschman, who suffered a brain injury when he fell and died 11 days later. I dont believe we have good

David Koschman faith and a legal basis to bring charges, she said. Explaining why she is turning to the Illinois State Police, Alvarez said, It would be a much cleaner investigation if it was somebody who hasnt been involved in the case. Alvarez said prosecutors didnt charge Vanecko when detectives consulted with her office in 2004 because the police said none of the six witnesses could positively identify Vanecko in a lineup, and that police reports all indicate that Koschman was physically aggressive, based on detectives interviews with Koschmans friends and the two bystanders. Asked whether she should have brought the case to a grand jury this time to decide whether to file charges, Alvarez said there isnt enough evidence to ask a grand jury to indict anyone. Before we take something to the grand jury, we have to have a good-fatih basis that a crime occurred and that the person we are seeking a true bill of indictment for did it, Alvarez said. Were not there at this point. It would be unethical for me to go to a grand jury at this point. I dont know if there was a crime committed here based on the facts we have. It could be justifiable.

MORE ONLINE: See video of Alvarez interview and her letter to State Police at suntimes.com