Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emergencies have an impact on a whole range of factors that can increase the risk of
malnutrition, illness (morbidity) and death (mortality). Unfortunately, high malnutrition and
mortality rates continue to occur during emergencies.
Hence a broad-based approach is required to address malnutrition. At one end of the scale,
interventions to ‘cure’ malnourished individuals and prevent death are essential. At the other
end of the scale, interventions to ‘prevent’ malnutrition rates from increasing are needed.
These interventions will range from those directed at protecting health and a healthy
environment, to ensuring food security (the ability of a household to access food). This broad-
based approach is referred to as a public nutrition approach.
What is an emergency?
Emergencies cover a wide variety of different scenarios. They differ in terms of:
• Length (short-term, chronic)
• Cause (natural, conflict-related, economic-political, ‘complex’)
• Impact (destruction of infrastructure, agricultural, health and social systems)
• Affected groups (internally displaced persons, refugees, stable populations)
• Humanitarian response (huge response, no response at all)
At the moment, however, there are no agreed thresholds above which a situation is defined as
a nutritional emergency or when certain responses kick in. In practice, there is little
relationship between whether a particular situation is labelled a nutrition emergency and the
level of malnutrition suffered by an affected population.
The allocation of emergency food aid is not based on the levels of wasting in a given country
but on a range of other factors including political motivations.
2
One of the most widely known is the FSAU/FAO Integrated food security phase classification 2006
Key messages
1. Protecting the nutritional status of vulnerable groups affected by emergencies is essential to
prevent acute malnutrition, disease and death.
2. Malnutrition does not result simply from lack of food but from a complex mix of factors.
3. There is no agreed definition of a ‘nutrition emergency’, though attempts have been made to
classify the severity of an emergency using acute malnutrition as one indicator of distress.
4. Nutrition emergencies are caused by severe shortages of food combined with disease epidemics.
5. Asia has historically suffered from the most severe famines, has the highest rates of acute
malnutrition true and is most prone to natural disaster.
6. Acute malnutrition is a major concern during emergencies but chronic malnutrition and
micronutrient deficiencies also arise and have negative effects.
7. Nutrition assessments using standard methods are commonly conducted at the outset and
throughout an emergency.
8. A range of food and non-food interventions are typically implemented during an emergency to
address and prevent malnutrition.
9. Existing challenges in the area of nutrition in emergencies include:
Lack of impartiality in responding to nutrition emergencies
Dominance of food aid
Constraints of the operational environment
HIV and AIDS and nutrition
Lack of an evidence base for interventions
Lack of skills and expertise in nutrition in emergencies