Case: 1:12-cv-00446 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/15/12 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:968

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ANDIRA AMIN, MAGED SOLIMAN, and MARK BOCHRA CIVIL ACTION NO: 1:12-CV-00446 Plaintiffs, v. 5757 NORTH SHERIDAN RD CONDO ASSOCIATION, an Illinois not-for-profit corporation, and RONALD MENDELBLAT, Defendants. Hon. Judge Joan H. Lefkow Hon. Mag Judge Jeffery Cole

AGREED ORDER This cause coming to be heard on the Plaintiffs Stipulation Requesting Dismissal, and this Court being fully advised of the premises. THE COURT FINDS THAT: Plaintiffs and Defendants (collectively the Parties) have reached an amicable resolution of their dispute and that there are no matters in controversy remaining between them. The Parties resolution is embodied in the Parties Mutual Settlement Agreement. Plaintiffs and Defendants acknowledge that this settlement, is not to be construed as an admission of fault by or an assessment of the actual rights of any of the parties. Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed that the terms of their settlement are to remain confidential and not to be disclosed except as allowed by their Mutual Settlement Agreement or as otherwise required by law. Plaintiffs and Defendants have agreed that the costs of this litigation shall be borne by the respective parties, as incurred, including any and all attorneys fees, costs, and expenses. Page 1 of 2

Case: 1:12-cv-00446 Document #: 66 Filed: 06/15/12 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:969

THE COURT THEREFORE ORDERS THAT: 1. By consent of the Parties, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Parties Mutual Settlement Agreement. 2. The Parties shall comply with the signed settlement agreement dated between them on June 10, 2012. The Parties expressly waive their rights under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d) to the extent Rule 65(d) requires this order to be specific in terms or to describe in reasonable detail and without reference to the settlement agreement, the act or acts to be restrained. 3. The costs of this litigation shall be borne by the respective parties, as incurred, including any and all attorneys fees, costs, and expenses. 4. This case is dismissed without prejudice with leave to reinstate on or before June 24, 2012 for the purpose of enforcing the settlement. This Agreed Order of Dismissal is entered without prejudice in order to allow the Court to enforce the settlement agreement. The Parties are barred from relitigating any claims raised in this litigation or any claims released by means of the settlement agreement. 5. In the event a motion to reinstate or motion to enforce settlement is not filed on or before June 24, 2012, the Court shall relinquish jurisdiction and the case shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice without further order of the Court. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs.

ENTERED this 15th day of June, 2012 ______________________________ JOAN HUMPHREY LEFKOW United States District Judge Page 2 of 2