Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/05/megaquak...
Go
Login
My New Scientist
Home
News
In-Depth Articles
Blogs
Opinion HEALTH
TV
Galleries LIFE
Topic Guides
Last Word
Subscribe
SPACE
TECH
ENVIRONMENT
PHYSICS&MATH
SCIENCE IN SOCIETY
Paul Marks, senior technology correspondent It wasn't only the massive tsunami that stripped the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power plant of its essential cooling capability on 11 March: the magnitude-9.0 megaquake had almost immediately caused a failure of the number 1 reactor's primary emergency backup cooling system, which uses the steam generated by the reactor to push coolant around it. Japan's public broadcaster NHK says the news was revealed in the nuclear plant's operational records released by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) on 16 May. "An emergency condenser system at the Number 1 reactor functioned for less than 10 minutes after the earthquake. The failure lasted for three hours," NHK World reports today. This early, pre-tsunami overheating may have speeded the reactor's meltdown. The revelation will be seized on as further evidence that nuclear plants have no place in seismically active zones - even if they have high tsunami walls and backup power sources sited well above any potential high-water line. Last week, prime minister Naoto Kan asked for - and got - the closure of what is thought to be Japan's worst placed nuclear plant, in Hamaoka, which straddles two subduction zones. It may re-open after a 15-metre tsunami wall is built in three years' time - but how backup cooling systems themselves cope with the severe physical agitation of megaquakes will doubtless now inform the wisdom of that decision. Meanwhile, it is becoming increasingly clear that the Japanese government has been privately concerned that tsunamis posed strong threats to nuclear plants, while outwardly suggesting that the Fukushima magnitude-9.0 quake and 15-metre tsunami was "beyond expectations". The Mainichi Times unearthed a December 2010 report from the Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organisation - a government body - that said:
CultureLab
Bookmark&share
Categories
2010 review Being Human Neuroscience 2010 Environment Events Fred's Footprint From the Editors Health Illusions Life Live from the AAAS
Our analysis shows that a tsunami of a certain height - some 7 metres in the absence of a sea wall and some 15 metres if one were present - or higher would have almost a 100 per cent chance of damaging the reactor core.
Neuroscience 2010 Obituary Opinion Physics & Math Picture of the day Science In Society
The lack of action on such warnings is fuelling the growing notion in Japan that its nuclear power firms and the thicket of regulatory bodies (that often employ the former's retired staff, in a process called amakudari) have too many vested interests to regulate a safety-critical industry effectively. But similar worries are being expressed about the toothless nuclear regulatory
1 of 3
5/18/2011 17:20
Short Sharp Science: Quake took out Fukushima cooling system before ts...
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/05/megaquak...
situation elsewhere, such as the US. There was some good news from Fukushima today, however. Nature News is blogging that the explosion at the plant's number 4 reactor building may not been caused by a hydrogen build-up from its own crippled reactor, but because hydrogen from the damaged number 3 reactor seeped through shared gas treatment pipework into reactors 4's building. This might mean the fuel pile is unharmed and that consequently reactor 4 could take a lot less time, effort and risk to clear up.
Twitter updates
Hey presto: Vehicle levitates without magnets http://bit.ly /jpD0PQ 16 minutes ago
Japan
megaquake
In the age of Twitter, it's impossible to stop leaks about major discoveries, says CERN's press chief http://bit.ly /mdEl3x about an hour ago
Post #Fukushima: Wind is Japan's strongest alternative to nuclear http://bit.ly/ljvkBu about an hour ago
Post a comment
Sign in to comment, or comment anonymously.
Recent entries
Space party: First beer brewed for off-planet drinking
Monthly archive
May 2011 (45) April 2011 (76) March 2011 (88)
Name Email Address URL Remember me? Comments (You may use HTML tags for style)
Today on New Scientist: 17 May 2011 Mississippi floods: how does 2011 compare?
February 2011 (71) January 2011 (87) December 2010 (77) November 2010 (93) October 2010 (64) September 2010 (61)
Preview
Submit
May 2010 (42) April 2010 (39) March 2010 (51) February 2010 (46) January 2010 (45)
Previous post
Next post
December 2009 (47) November 2009 (40) October 2009 (33) September 2009 (29) August 2009 (17) July 2009 (28) June 2009 (20) May 2009 (33) April 2009 (33)
2 of 3
5/18/2011 17:20
Short Sharp Science: Quake took out Fukushima cooling system before ts...
http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2011/05/megaquak...
Tags
climateclimate change
September 2008 (42)
endangered species energyenvironment evolutiongeneticsglobal warmingGooglehealth internetJapanJapan megaquake 2011Large Hadron Collider Mars moon NASAoil oil spill pollution privacysecurity spacespace shuttle swine flu technology
Back to top
Go
Login
About us
New Scientist Syndication Recruitment Advertising Who's who Advertise RBI Jobs
User Help
Contact Us FAQ / Help Disclaimer Ts & Cs Cookies Privacy Policy
Subscriptions
Subscribe Renew Gift subscription My account Back issues Customer Service
Links
Site Map Browse all articles Magazine archive NewScientistJobs The LastWord E-Newsletter RSS Feeds Online Store Android App
Science Jobs
Biology Jobs Chemistry Jobs Clinical Jobs Sales Jobs Earth & Environment Jobs Engineering Jobs Maths & IT Jobs Graduate Jobs
3 of 3
5/18/2011 17:20