Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Date
1. How is the patients problems presented by the students? a. By them selves b. By guiding c. Not present at all
2. How is the procedure examination conducted by the students? a. Appropriate b. Need more practice
4. How is the learning issues discussed by the students? a. By them selves b. by guiding c. Not discussed at all
5. How is the basic mechanism of patients problems discussed by the students? a. Adequate b. Inadequate
6. How is the time allocated for thus problems? a. Appropriate b. Too long c. Need more time
Comments:
Preceptor,
CLINICAL/ COMMUNITY SCIENCE SESSION Date Case Presenter : : : 1 2 3 4 5 6 Final Result (average 1-6)
1.Ability to write scientific paper systematicly (including the bibliography) 2. Ability to implement EBM in information gathering and citation 3. Self directed learning 4. Ability to identify and discuss the major mechanism (s) involved 5. Ability to verbalize their knowledge during presentation 6. Students performance: systemic, attitude, communication Audience: N Students name NPM o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Item to be evaluated: 1. Partisipation during discussion 2. Ability to verbalize their knowledge during the presentation 1 2 3 4 Final result(average 1-4)
3. Students performance: attitude communication 4. Ability to identify and discuss the major mechanism(s) involved Scale LOW 1 56 C 2 60 C+ 3 64 4 68 5 75 B+ 6 78 7 80 8 90 9 100 HIGH
C++ B
B++ A
MINI CLINICAL EVALUATION EXERCISE (MINI-CEX) FORM Students name Date Diagnosis Setting Other Patients information Focus : : :a. Out-patient :Age: Sex: b. In patient c. Emergency Dept d. New/follow up: d. Conseling :
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
SUPERIOR
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
SUPERIOR
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
SUPERIOR
SATISFACTORY
SUPERIOR
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
SUPERIOR
UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
SUPERIOR
UNSATISFACTORY Mini CEX tie: Observibg: Evaluator: LOW 1 Student: LOW 1 Comment 2 3 4 2 3 4
SUPERIOR minutes
HIGH
HIGH
SignatureStudent
Evaluator