Managerial Statistic

Tssehay Tadele G/Michael ID. # DEC/0181/01 Group 3

TMA - 03

Q# 1. Similarities: 1. Both distributions are positively skewed. 2. Both distribution serve to test hypothetical data at a given confident interval Difference:. 1. F - distribution used to test hypothesis for quantitative data where as Chi square is for test qualitative data. 2. F distribution is used to analyses if there is a significant difference between mean of several samples data while chi square is used check the closeness of fit to either normal, Poisson binomial distribution. Q# 2. a) Chi Square test b) Ho: Profession and material status are not related. Ha: Ho is not true. c) In each cell along the marital status column are filled with the data collected. Professions Married Musician Physician Teacher Accountants Marital Status Single Divorce

d) Degree of freedom (d.f) = 2 (r -1)(c-1), where r = number of row and c = number of column = (4-1)*(3-1) =6 Q#3. Ho: there is no significant difference in the performance of fertilizer. Ha: Ho is not true. SST = 240; SSB = 100, K = 4, = 0.01. SSW = SST SSB SSW = 140.
1 of 5| P a g e

Managerial Statistic
Tssehay Tadele G/Michael ID. # DEC/0181/01 Group 3

TMA - 03

ANOVA Source of variation Between With in Total Sum of square SSB = 100 SSW = 140 SST = 240 Degree of freedom K- 1=4-1=3 N-K = 28 4 = 24 Mean square MSB = 100/3 = 33.33 MSW = 140/24 = 5.23 F

F= MSB/MSW = 33.33/5.23 = 5.717

F 0.01 (3, 24) = 4.72 (from F - Distribution table) F cal > F table, reject Ho There is significant difference in the performance of these fertilizers. Q#4.
Professions Physicians Lawyers Accountants Total Music 20 25 40 85 entertainment Swimming 15 35 42 92 Total 35 60 83 177

and

= 0.05

Ho: Profusions and type of entertainment are independent. Ha: Ha is not true. = = 16.81,

2 = =
)

= 0.61 + 0.5 + 0.01 + 0.56 + 0.46 + 0.01 2 = 2.15

2 of 5| P a g e

Managerial Statistic
Tssehay Tadele G/Michael ID. # DEC/0181/01 Group 3

TMA - 03

Degree of freedom = (r-1) (c-1) = (3-1)(2-1) = 2 2 (2) = 5.99.

2 cal. < 2 table, therefore accept Ho.

Therefore, no relationship exists between the type of profession and entertainment. Q# 5. Test for uniformity. Tea Brand A B Total = 0.05. Test Hypothesis; Ho: there is uniform preference of tea brand for all age group. Ha: Ho is not true table for the above data, 65 35 45.5 24.5 19.5 10.5 children 80 20 100 Age group Middle 40 30 70 Total Old 10 20 30 130 70 200

2 = =
)

= 17.315

2 (r-1)(c-1) = 2(0.05) (2-1)(3-1) = 2(0.05) (2) = 5.99, from the Chi square table. 2cal. > 2table, reject Ho. Therefore, there is no uniformity in the preference of different type of the tea brand among the age group.
3 of 5| P a g e

Managerial Statistic
Tssehay Tadele G/Michael ID. # DEC/0181/01 Group 3

TMA - 03

Q #6. Given the following, test for a distribution

Data(x) 0 1 2 3 4 5 n=6 No. of observation(fi) 5 22 40 34 20 12 N = 133 fi xi 0 22 80 102 80 60

= 0.05, n = 6

A) Test for binomial distributiondd

Ho: Data has a binomial distribution Ha: Ho is not true. P is approximated by

=
) ) ) ) ) ) )

)=

= 0.43.
, where, q = 1- p =0.48 and n = 6 (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

= 0.03 = 0.15 = 0.29 = 0.29 = 0.17 = 0.05

=)

= 133 * 0.03 = 4.51

= 133 * 0.15 = 20.51

= 133 * 0.29 = 38.85 = 133 * 0.29 = 39.23 = 133 * 0.17 = 22.29 = 133 * 0.05 = 6.75

) )

4 of 5| P a g e

Managerial Statistic
Tssehay Tadele G/Michael ID. # DEC/0181/01 Group 3

TMA - 03

2 =

= 5.20

2 (n- 2) = 20.05 (n-2) = 20.05 (4) = 9.488 2calc. < 2table, Accept Ho. Therefore, the data fits in a binomial distribution with = 5% B) Test for poissons distribution

Ho: Data has a poissons distribution Ha: Ho is not true. ) ) ) ) ) ) )

, x = 0,1,2,3,4,5; is approximated by

= 344/133 = 2.51

= 0.08 = 0.20 = 0.25 = 0.12 = 0.13 = 0.06

= = =

=)

= 133 * 0.08 = 10.64

= 133 * 0.20 = 26.6 = 133 * 0.25 = 33.25 = 133 * 0.12 = 15.96 = 133 * 0.13 = 17.29 = 133 * 0.06 = 7.98

= =

2 =

= 27.99636

2 (n- 2) = 20.05 (n-2) = 20.05 (4) = 9.488 2calc. > 2table, reject Ho. The data is not fit in the poisson distribution.

5 of 5| P a g e