Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20, 1968), p. 185 Published by: Economic and Political Weekly Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4358145 . Accessed: 25/01/2013 17:33
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Economic and Political Weekly.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded on Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:33:16 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL WEEKLY duction, sales and despatches of HMT have gone up. It now produces a range of over 17 families of standard machine tools and a steadily widening range of special purpose machine tools. That the range of diversification is still limited is, however, clearly indicated by the continuing large volume of imports. The impact of the recession has been felt not by sales but by profits. Profitability in 1966-67 has been halved as compared with 1964-65, though it is fractionally higher than in 1965-66. The proportion of cost of sales to salles has increased steadily and the turnover of capital has been declining. Stock of finished goods and work-in-progress have also increased as a proportion of sales. At the beginning of the Third Plati, HMT had a scheme to set up one new machine tool plant every year. Starting with only one plant at Bangalore during the period 1953 to 1960, it went on to add the second Bangalore plant in 1961, Pinjore in 1963, Kalamassery in 1964 and Hyderabad in 1966. It also set up a watch factory at Bangalore in 1962. The recession has dampened this straight line expansion; plans for diupli. cating Pinjore and Kalamassery lhave been deferred. Instead, the accent now is on diversification. Foundries are expected to be commissioned in Kalamassery and Hyderabad shortly. The watch factory is being expanded and a new company is being form'ed in collaboration with Verson of US for the manufacture of medium and heavy presses for automoble and other engineering industries. Another company with the participation of Albert of West Germany will mamnfacturecylinder letterpresses and offset presses for single and multi-colour printing. This will represent the country's first venture in large scale manufacture of printing machinery, which has made very little progress so far. in the corresponding period of the previous year. Thrice during the year, the company had to lay off abotit 1,000 workers for a total period of 10 weeks. To make its trucks more popular, the company has introduced a new high-powered engine and also intends to make certain changes in sheet metal components. Part of the idle capacity of the plant has been utilised for the manufacture of Fiat cars whose production during 1966-67 rose to 8,661 against 5,739 in the previous year and in the four months ended October last to 3,724 against 2,471 in the same period of the previous year. Car production is expected to rise still fuirther but the price is still fixed at an "unreasonably low" level. PAL hopes that its Fiat 600 may find acceptance in the elusive search for a "small car". It is a four-seater, rearengine car with a maximum speed of 70 miles an hour and fuel consumptioii of 45-50 miles per gallon. Commcnting on its price, chairman Lalchand Hirachand says that a car of this type
January 20, 1968 costs Rs 7,700 to 8,100 in foreign countries and that in India it would cost more owing to the low volume of production and the high cost of imported materials and equipment. Since the price limit for the "small car" (which was originally fixed at Rs 6,000) is Rs 7,000, PAL, has little chance of getting Fiat 600 accepted by Government. PAL's results for 1966-67 are disappointing. No surplus is available for depreciation and development rebate; arrears on these accounts come to Rs 1.67 crores and Rs 89 lakhs, respectively. The 6 per cent dividend declared for 1965-66 was challenged by a member in the Court and the mnatter is sub judice. US AID has informned the company that the divid nd distribution of Rs 45 lakhs would violate the conditions of the loan granted by it and that the company should not pay a dividend in excess of Rs 19 lakhs. For payment of this amount, too, it has first to obtain the written consent of the Indian guarantor bank.
LETTERS TO EDITOR
This content downloaded on Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:33:16 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions